Ambient noise-based adaptation of secondary path adaptive response in noise-canceling personal audio devices

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9208771
  • Patent Number
    9,208,771
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 25, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 8, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
An adaptive noise canceller adapts a secondary path modeling response using ambient noise, rather than using another noise source or source audio as a training source. Anti-noise generated from a reference microphone signal using a first adaptive filter is used as the training signal for training the secondary path response. Ambient noise at the error microphone is removed from an error microphone signal, so that only anti-noise remains. A primary path modeling adaptive filter is used to modify the reference microphone signal to generate a source of ambient noise that is correlated with the ambient noise present at the error microphone, which is then subtracted from the error microphone signal to generate the error signal. The primary path modeling adaptive filter is previously adapted by minimizing components of the error microphone signal appearing in an output of the primary path adaptive filter while the anti-noise signal is muted.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to personal audio devices such as headphones that include adaptive noise cancellation (ANC), and, more specifically, to architectural features of an ANC system in which a secondary path estimating response is trained using ambient noise.


2. Background of the Invention


Wireless telephones, such as mobile/cellular telephones, cordless telephones, and other consumer audio devices, such as MP3 players, are in widespread use. Performance of such devices with respect to intelligibility can be improved by providing noise canceling using a reference microphone to measure ambient acoustic events and then using signal processing to insert an anti-noise signal into the output of the device to cancel the ambient acoustic events.


Noise canceling operation can be improved by measuring the transducer output of a device at the transducer to determine the effectiveness of the noise canceling using an error microphone. The measured output of the transducer is ideally the source audio, e.g., downlink audio in a telephone and/or playback audio in either a dedicated audio player or a telephone, since the noise canceling signal(s) are ideally canceled by the ambient noise at the location of the transducer. To remove the source audio from the error microphone signal, the secondary path from the transducer through the error microphone can be estimated and used to filter the source audio to the correct phase and amplitude for subtraction from the error microphone signal. However, when source audio is absent, the secondary path estimate cannot typically be updated. In particular, at the beginning of a telephone conversation, the secondary path estimate may be incorrect and there is no source audio available for training the secondary path estimate until downlink speech commences.


Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a personal audio device, including wireless telephones, that provides noise cancellation using a secondary path estimate to measure the output of the transducer and that can adapt the secondary path estimate independent of whether source audio of sufficient amplitude is present.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The above-stated objective of providing a personal audio device providing noise cancelling including a secondary path estimate that can be adapted whether or not source audio has been present, is accomplished in a personal audio device, a method of operation, and an integrated circuit.


The personal audio device includes a housing, with a transducer mounted on the housing for reproducing an audio signal that includes both source audio for plackback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering the effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer. An error microphone is mounted on the housing to provide an error microphone signal indicative of the transducer output and the ambient audio sounds. The personal audio device further includes an adaptive noise-canceling (ANC) processing circuit within the housing for adaptively generating an anti-noise signal from the error microphone signal such that the anti-noise signal causes substantial cancellation of the ambient audio sounds. The processing circuit controls adaptation of a secondary path adaptive filter for compensating for the electro-acoustical path from the output of the processing circuit through the transducer, wherein the processing circuit removes source audio as shaped by the secondary path response from the error microphone signal to provide an error signal. The processing circuit provides ambient noise to the secondary path adaptive filter's coefficient control circuit as a training signal for adapting the secondary path response. The ambient noise provided to the coefficient control circuit may be the anti-noise signal generated from the reference microphone signal, and the ambient noise present at the error microphone removed from the error microphone signal using a primary path modeling adaptive filter to generate an error signal that contains only the components of the error microphone signal due to the anti-noise reproduced by the transducer. The response of the primary path modeling adaptive filter is earlier adapted using the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal, so that components of the error microphone signal appearing in an output of the primary path adaptive filter are minimized.


The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular, description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary wireless telephone 10.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of circuits within wireless telephone 10.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram depicting signal processing circuits and functional blocks of various exemplary ANC circuits that can be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of CODEC integrated circuit 20 of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a timing diagram illustrating operation of ANC circuit 30.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram depicting signal processing circuits and functional blocks within CODEC integrated circuit 20





DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT

The present disclosure reveals noise canceling techniques and circuits that can be implemented in a personal audio device, such as a wireless telephone. The personal audio device includes an adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuit that measures the ambient acoustic environment and generates a signal that is injected into the speaker (or other transducer) output to cancel ambient acoustic events. A reference microphone is provided to measure the ambient acoustic environment, and an error microphone is included to measure the ambient audio and transducer output at the transducer, thus giving an indication of the effectiveness of the noise cancellation. A secondary path estimating adaptive filter is used to remove the playback audio from the error microphone signal, in order to generate an error signal. However, depending on the presence (and level) of the audio signal reproduced by the personal audio device, e.g., downlink audio during a telephone conversation or playback audio from a media file/connection, the secondary path adaptive filter may not be able to continue to adapt to estimate the secondary path response. Further, at the beginning of a telephone conversation, not only may downlink audio be absent, but any previous secondary path model may be inaccurate due to a different position of the wireless telephone with respect to the user's ear. The techniques disclosed herein use ambient noise to provide enough energy for the secondary path estimating adaptive filter to continue to adapt, in a manner that is unobtrusive to the user. The anti-noise signal may be provided to the secondary path adaptive filter, in order to provide a training signal for adapting the secondary path response estimate. The error microphone signal is corrected to remove components due to ambient noise present at the error microphone, leaving only components due to the anti-noise signal. The components due to ambient noise are removed using a primary path response modeling adaptive filter that has been previously adapted to model the primary path response.



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary wireless telephone 10 in proximity to a human ear 5. Illustrated wireless telephone 10 is an example of a device in which techniques illustrated herein may be employed, but it is understood that not all of the elements or configurations embodied in illustrated wireless telephone 10, or in the circuits depicted in subsequent illustrations, are required. Wireless telephone 10 includes a transducer such as a speaker SPKR that reproduces distant speech received by wireless telephone 10, along with other local audio events such as ringtones, stored audio program material, near-end speech, sources from web-pages or other network communications received by wireless telephone 10 and audio indications such as battery low and other system event notifications. A near speech microphone NS is provided to capture near-end speech, which is transmitted from wireless telephone 10 to the other conversation participant(s).


Wireless telephone 10 includes adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuits and features that inject an anti-noise signal into speaker SPKR to improve intelligibility of the distant speech and other audio reproduced by speaker SPKR. A reference microphone R is provided for measuring the ambient acoustic environment and is positioned away from the typical position of a user's mouth, so that the near-end speech is minimized in the signal produced by reference microphone R. A third microphone, error microphone E, is provided in order to further improve the ANC operation by providing a measure of the ambient audio combined with the audio reproduced by speaker SPKR close to ear 5, when wireless telephone 10 is in close proximity to ear 5. An exemplary circuit 14 within wireless telephone 10 includes an audio CODEC integrated circuit 20 that receives the signals from reference microphone R, near speech microphone NS, and error microphone E and interfaces with other integrated circuits such as an RF integrated circuit 12 containing the wireless telephone transceiver. In other implementations, the circuits and techniques disclosed herein may be incorporated in a single integrated circuit that contains control circuits and other functionality for implementing the entirety of the personal audio device, such as an MP3 player-on-a-chip integrated circuit.


In general, the ANC techniques disclosed herein measure ambient acoustic events (as opposed to the output of speaker SPKR and/or the near-end speech) impinging on reference microphone R, and also measure the same ambient acoustic events impinging on error microphone E. The ANC processing circuits of illustrated wireless telephone 10 adapt an anti-noise signal generated from the output of reference microphone R to have a characteristic that minimizes the amplitude of the ambient acoustic events present at error microphone E. Since acoustic path P(z) extends from reference microphone R to error microphone E, the ANC circuits are essentially estimating acoustic path P(z) combined with removing effects of an electro-acoustic path S(z). Electro-acoustic path S(z) represents the response of the audio output circuits of CODEC IC 20 and the acoustic/electric transfer function of speaker SPKR including the coupling between speaker SPKR and error microphone E in the particular acoustic environment. Path S(z) is affected by the proximity and structure of ear 5 and other physical objects and human head structures that may be in proximity to wireless telephone 10, when wireless telephone 10 is not firmly pressed to ear 5. While the illustrated wireless telephone 10 includes a two microphone ANC system with a third near speech microphone NS, other systems that do not include separate error and reference microphones can implement the above-described techniques. Alternatively, near speech microphone NS can be used to perform the function of the reference microphone R in the above-described system. Finally, in personal audio devices designed only for audio playback, near speech microphone NS will generally not be included, and the near speech signal paths in the circuits described in further detail below can be omitted.


Referring now to FIG. 2, circuits within wireless telephone 10 are shown in a block diagram. CODEC integrated circuit 20 includes an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 21A for receiving the reference microphone signal and generating a digital representation ref of the reference microphone signal, an ADC 21B for receiving the error microphone signal and generating a digital representation err of the error microphone signal, and an ADC 21C for receiving the near speech microphone signal and generating a digital representation of near speech microphone signal ns. CODEC IC 20 generates an output for driving speaker SPKR from an amplifier A1, which amplifies the output of a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 23 that receives the output of a combiner 26A. Another combiner 26B combines audio signals is from internal audio sources 24 and downlink speech ds received from a radio frequency (RF) integrated circuit 22 to form source audio signal (ds+ia), which is provided to combiner 26A and to an ANC circuit 30. Combiner 26A combines source audio signal (ds+ia) with the anti-noise signal provided from ANC circuit 30 and a portion of near speech signal ns. Near speech signal ns is also provided to RF integrated circuit 22 and is transmitted as uplink speech to the service provider via an antenna ANT. Anti-noise signal anti-noise by convention has the same polarity as the noise in reference microphone signal ref and is therefore subtracted by combiner 26A.



FIG. 3 shows one example of details of an ANC circuit 30A that can be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of FIG. 2. A pair of selectors 38A-38B are controlled by a control signal sel provided from a control circuit 39. Selectors 38A-38B select between two operating modes: a normal mode, selected when control signal sel is de-asserted (sel=0) and an ambient noise-based SE training mode selected when control signal sel is asserted (sel=1). The ambient noise is selectively provided to train response SE(z) when control signal sel is asserted (sel=1). In the normal operating mode (sel=0), an adaptive filter 32 receives reference microphone signal ref and under ideal circumstances, adapts its transfer function W(z) to be P(z)/S(z) to generate the anti-noise signal anti-noise, which is provided to an output combiner that combines the anti-noise signal with the audio to be reproduced by the transducer, as exemplified by combiner 26A of FIG. 2. The coefficients of adaptive filter 32 are controlled by a W coefficient control block 31 that uses a correlation of two signals to determine the response of adaptive filter 32, which generally minimizes the error, in a least-mean squares sense, between those components of reference microphone signal ref present in error microphone signal err. The signals processed by W coefficient control block 31 are the reference microphone signal ref as shaped by a copy of an estimate of the response of path S(z) provided by a filter 34B and another signal that includes error microphone signal err. By transforming reference microphone signal ref with a copy of the estimate of the response of path S(z), response SECOPY(z), and minimizing error microphone signal err after removing components of error microphone signal err due to playback of source audio, adaptive filter 32 adapts to the desired response of P(z)/S(z). In addition to error microphone signal err, the other signal processed along with the output of filter 34B by W coefficient control block 31 includes an inverted amount of the source audio including downlink audio signal ds and internal audio ia that has been processed by filter response SE(z), of which response SECOPY(z) is a copy. By injecting an inverted amount of source audio, adaptive filter 32 is prevented from adapting to the relatively large amount of source audio present in error microphone signal err and by transforming the inverted copy of downlink audio signal ds and internal audio ia with the estimate of the response of path S(z), the source audio that is removed from error microphone signal err before processing should match the expected version of downlink audio signal ds, and internal audio ia reproduced at error microphone signal err, since the electrical and acoustical path of S(z) is the path taken by downlink audio signal ds and internal audio ia to arrive at error microphone E. Filter 34B is not an adaptive filter, per se, but has an adjustable response that is tuned to match the response of a secondary path adaptive filter 34A, so that the response of filter 34B tracks the adapting of secondary path adaptive filter 34A.


To implement the above, secondary path adaptive filter 34A has coefficients controlled by a SE coefficient control block 33, which processes the source audio (ds+ia) and error microphone signal err after removal, by a combiner 36B, of the above-described filtered downlink audio signal ds and internal audio ia, that has been filtered by secondary path adaptive filter 34A to represent the expected source audio delivered to error microphone E. Secondary path adaptive filter 34A is thereby adapted to generate an error signal e from downlink audio signal ds and internal audio ia, that when subtracted from error microphone signal err, contains the content of error microphone signal err that is not due to source audio (ds+ia). However, if downlink audio signal ds and internal audio ia are both absent, e.g., at the beginning of a telephone call, or have very low amplitude, SE coefficient control block 33 will not have sufficient input to estimate acoustic path S(z). Therefore, in ANC circuit 30A, when source audio has not been present, the secondary path estimate is updated by using the ambient noise-based SE training mode mentioned above, which uses ambient noise measured by reference microphone R as a training signal for updating response SE(z) of secondary path adaptive filter 34A.


When SE coefficient control 33 needs to be updated, e.g., at the start of a telephone conversation, and a source audio detector 37 indicates that source audio (ds+ia) has insufficient amplitude for training the secondary path response SE(z), control circuit 39 asserts control signal sel to select the ambient noise-based training mode. In order to provide a copy of the ambient noise training signal referenced at the location of error microphone E, an adaptive filter 50 is used to model acoustic path P(z). During an initial training phase with ANC turned off, which is accomplished by de-activating (muting) a controllable amplifier stage 35 in response to de-assertion of a control signal haltPE, adaptive filter models path P(z) by filtering reference microphone signal ref with adaptive filter 50 and subtracting the output of adaptive filter 50 from error microphone signal err using a combiner 36A. Control signal haltSE is also asserted to prevent adaptation of secondary path response SE(z) during adaptation of the primary path response PE(z) of adaptive filter 50. The output of combiner 36A is compared with reference microphone signal err in a PE coefficient control block 51 which is generally a least-mean-squared (LMS) control block, which causes adaptive filter 50 to adapt primary path response PE(z) to match acoustic path P(z). After primary path response PE(z) is adapted, control signal haltPE is asserted, causing PE coefficient control block to maintain primary path response PE(z) at its current value. Subsequently, adaptive filter 50 filters reference microphone signal ref to provide an output that is representative of the ambient noise component of error microphone signal err. Control signal setW is also set to cause coefficient control block 31 to set the response of adaptive filter 32 to a predetermined response for generating the ambient noise training signal, generally a response that should provide some noise cancelling effect while response SE(z) of adaptive filter 34 is being trained, since the ambient noise training signal will be audible as the anti-noise signal anti-noise while secondary path adaptive filter 32 is being adapted. A combiner 36C is used in the ambient noise-based SE training mode (sel=1) to subtract the output of adaptive filter 50 from error microphone signal err. Combiner 36C thus effectively removes the ambient noise component from error microphone signal err, so that error signal e will contain only a component due to anti-noise signal anti-noise, since source audio (ds+ia) is absent or very low in amplitude. During this time, anti-noise signal anti-noise is provided to the input of adaptive filter 34A via selector 38A and control signal haltSE is de-asserted so that SE coefficient control block 33 is allowed to update coefficients to train response SE(z). Once response SE(z) is adapted, control signal sel is de-asserted and control signals haltW and setW are also de-asserted to allow response W(z) to adapt by updating coefficient control block 31.


Referring now to FIG. 4, a sequence for training SE both with and without source audio (ds+ia) is shown, as can be performed within ANC circuit 30A of FIG. 3. At time t1, signal level is low, indicating that insufficient source audio (ds+ia) is present for adapting response SE(z). Between times t1 and t2, control signal haltPE is de-asserted, which causes primary path response PE(z) of adaptive filter 50 to model path P(z). Next, between times t2 and t3, control signal SetW is asserted to set response W(z) to a predetermined value. Once adaptive filter 50 has adapted at time t2, control signal haltPE is asserted to maintain the response of adaptive filter 50 at its current value, and control signal haltSE is de-asserted to allow response SE(z) to adapt. Control signal SetW remains asserted to provide a predetermined response for adaptive filter 32 while adaptive filter 34A is adapting. During the interval between times t2 and t3, secondary path adaptive filter 34A trains its response to the ambient noise received by reference microphone signal R transformed by response W(z), which has been set to a predetermined response (or a bypass flat response) in response to assertion of control signal setW. As in the normal mode, the output of secondary path adaptive filter 34A is subtracted from error microphone signal err to provide an input to SE coefficient control 33 and response SE(z) adapts to model S(z), just as when downlink audio is available. At time t3, control signals setW and haltW are de-asserted, to permit response W(z) of adaptive filter 32 to adapt. At time t4, another training of response SE(z) is commenced, which could be due to another call being initiated, a detected change in the response of SE(z), a change in ear pressure, instability, etc. Signal level is in an asserted state, indicating that sufficient source audio (ds+ia) is present, and so the cycle from times t1 and t3 is not repeated, but rather, response SE(z) will be training in the normal operating mode using source audio (ds+ia). Between times t4 and t5, control signal haltSE is de-asserted and control signal haltW is asserted, permitting response SE(z) of adaptive filter 34A to adapt, and then between times t5 and t6, control signal haltSE is asserted and control signal haltW is de-asserted, permitting response W(z) of adaptive filter 32 to adapt. However, in the normal operating mode, adapting of adaptive filter 34A and adaptive filter 32 can be carried out simultaneously or in any other suitable manner.


Referring now to FIG. 5, a block diagram of an ANC system is shown for implementing ANC techniques as depicted in FIG. 3, and having a processing circuit 40 as may be implemented within CODEC integrated circuit 20 of FIG. 2. Processing circuit 40 includes a processor core 42 coupled to a memory 44 in which are stored program instructions comprising a computer-program product that may implement some or all of the above-described ANC techniques, as well as other signal processing. Optionally, a dedicated digital signal processing (DSP) logic 46 may be provided to implement a portion of, or alternatively all of, the ANC signal processing provided by processing circuit 40. Processing circuit 40 also includes ADCs 21A-21C, for receiving inputs from reference microphone R, error microphone E and near speech microphone NS, respectively. DAC 23 and amplifier A1 are also provided by processing circuit 40 for providing the transducer output signal, including anti-noise as described above.


While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing, as well as other changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A personal audio device, comprising: a personal audio device housing;a transducer mounted on the housing for reproducing an audio signal including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering the effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone mounted on the housing for providing a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone mounted on the housing in proximity to the transducer for providing an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that generates the anti-noise signal from the reference signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response controlled by a secondary path coefficient control circuit in conformity with the error signal, wherein the secondary path adaptive filter shapes the source audio with the secondary path response, wherein the processing circuit removes the source audio as shaped by the secondary path response from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal, wherein the processing circuit provides an ambient noise training signal generated from the reference microphone signal to the secondary path adaptive filter to adapt the secondary path response.
  • 2. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit detects an amplitude of the source audio, and selectively provides the ambient noise training signal to the secondary path adaptive filter in response to detecting that the amplitude of the source audio is below a threshold value.
  • 3. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit sets a response of the first adaptive filter to a predetermined response to generate the ambient noise training signal from the reference microphone signal.
  • 4. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit further implements a primary path modeling adaptive filter having a primary path response, and wherein the processing circuit applies the primary path response to the reference microphone signal and subtracts a result of applying the primary path response to the reference microphone signal from the error microphone signal to generate the error signal.
  • 5. The personal audio device of claim 4, wherein the processing circuit sequences adaptation of the secondary path response and the primary path response so that the primary path response is adapted while the secondary path response is held at a fixed value, and then the secondary path response is adapted after the primary path response has adapted.
  • 6. The personal audio device of claim 5, wherein the processing circuit mutes the anti-noise signal while the primary path response is adapted.
  • 7. The personal audio device of claim 6, wherein the processing circuit sets a response of the first adaptive filter to a predetermined response while the ambient noise training signal is provided to the secondary path adaptive filter and the secondary path response is adapted.
  • 8. The personal audio device of claim 7, wherein the processing circuit adapts the response of the first adaptive filter after the secondary path response is adapted.
  • 9. A method of countering effects of ambient audio sounds by a personal audio device, the method comprising: adaptively generating an anti-noise signal from a reference microphone signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and a reference microphone signal;combining the anti-noise signal with source audio;providing a result of the combining to a transducer;measuring an acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds with an error microphone;implementing a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response controlled by a secondary path coefficient control circuit in conformity with the error signal;shaping the source audio with the secondary path response;removing the source audio as shaped by the secondary path response from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal;generating an ambient noise training signal from the reference microphone signal; andselectively providing the ambient noise training signal to the secondary path adaptive filter to adapt the secondary path response.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising detecting an amplitude of the source audio, and wherein the selectively providing the ambient noise training to the secondary path adaptive filter provides the ambient noise training signal to the secondary path adaptive filter in response to detecting that the amplitude of the source audio is below a threshold value.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, further comprising setting a response of the first adaptive filter to a predetermined response to generate the ambient noise training signal.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, further comprising: modeling a primary path response with a primary path modeling adaptive filter;applying the primary path response to the reference microphone signal; andsubtracting a result of the applying the primary path response to the reference microphone signal from the error microphone signal to generate the error signal.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising sequencing adaptation of the secondary path response and the primary path response so that the primary path response is adapted while the secondary path response is held at a fixed value, and then the secondary path response is adapted after the primary path response has adapted.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising muting the anti-noise signal while the primary path response is adapted.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising setting a response of the first adaptive filter to a predetermined response while the ambient noise training signal is provided to the secondary path adaptive filter and the secondary path response is adapted.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the adaptively generating adapts the response of the first adaptive filter after the secondary path response is adapted.
  • 17. An integrated circuit for implementing at least a portion of a personal audio device, comprising: an output for providing an output signal to an output transducer including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering the effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone input for receiving a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone input for receiving an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer;a noise source for providing a noise signal; anda processing circuit that generates the anti-noise signal from the reference signal by adapting a first adaptive filter to reduce the presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener in conformity with an error signal and the reference microphone signal, wherein the processing circuit implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response controlled by a secondary path coefficient control circuit in conformity with the error signal, wherein the secondary path adaptive filter shapes the source audio with the secondary path response, wherein the processing circuit removes the source audio as shaped by the secondary path response from the error microphone signal to provide the error signal, wherein the processing circuit provides an ambient noise training signal generated from the reference microphone signal to the secondary path adaptive filter to adapt the secondary path response.
  • 18. The integrated circuit of claim 17, wherein the processing circuit detects an amplitude of the source audio, and selectively provides the ambient noise training signal to the secondary path adaptive filter in response to detecting that the amplitude of the source audio is below a threshold value.
  • 19. The integrated circuit of claim 17, wherein the processing circuit sets a response of the first adaptive filter to a predetermined response to generate the ambient noise training signal from the reference microphone signal.
  • 20. The integrated circuit of claim 17, wherein the processing circuit further implements a primary path modeling adaptive filter having a primary path response, and wherein the processing circuit applies the primary path response to the reference microphone signal and subtracts a result of applying the primary path response to the reference microphone signal from the error microphone signal to generate the error signal.
  • 21. The integrated circuit of claim 20, wherein the processing circuit sequences adaptation of the secondary path response and the primary path response so that the primary path response is adapted while the secondary path response is held at a fixed value, and then the secondary path response is adapted after the primary path response has adapted.
  • 22. The integrated circuit of claim 21, wherein the processing circuit mutes the anti-noise signal while the primary path response is adapted.
  • 23. The integrated circuit of claim 22, wherein the processing circuit sets a response of the first adaptive filter to a predetermined response while the ambient noise training signal is provided to the secondary path adaptive filter and the secondary path response is adapted.
  • 24. The integrated circuit of claim 23, wherein the processing circuit adapts the response of the first adaptive filter after the secondary path response is adapted.
Parent Case Info

This U.S. patent application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/787,641 filed on Mar. 15, 2013.

US Referenced Citations (198)
Number Name Date Kind
5251263 Andrea et al. Oct 1993 A
5278913 Delfosse et al. Jan 1994 A
5321759 Yuan Jun 1994 A
5337365 Hamabe et al. Aug 1994 A
5359662 Yuan et al. Oct 1994 A
5410605 Sawada et al. Apr 1995 A
5425105 Lo et al. Jun 1995 A
5445517 Kondou et al. Aug 1995 A
5465413 Enge et al. Nov 1995 A
5548681 Gleaves et al. Aug 1996 A
5586190 Trantow et al. Dec 1996 A
5640450 Watanabe Jun 1997 A
5699437 Finn Dec 1997 A
5706344 Finn Jan 1998 A
5740256 Castello Da Costa et al. Apr 1998 A
5768124 Stothers et al. Jun 1998 A
5815582 Claybaugh et al. Sep 1998 A
5832095 Daniels Nov 1998 A
5946391 Dragwidge et al. Aug 1999 A
5991418 Kuo Nov 1999 A
6041126 Terai et al. Mar 2000 A
6118878 Jones Sep 2000 A
6219427 Kates et al. Apr 2001 B1
6278786 McIntosh Aug 2001 B1
6282176 Hemkumar Aug 2001 B1
6418228 Terai et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434246 Kates et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434247 Kates et al. Aug 2002 B1
6522746 Marchok et al. Feb 2003 B1
6683960 Fujii et al. Jan 2004 B1
6766292 Chandran Jul 2004 B1
6768795 Feltstrom et al. Jul 2004 B2
6850617 Weigand Feb 2005 B1
6940982 Watkins Sep 2005 B1
7058463 Ruha et al. Jun 2006 B1
7103188 Jones Sep 2006 B1
7181030 Rasmussen et al. Feb 2007 B2
7330739 Somayajula Feb 2008 B2
7365669 Melanson Apr 2008 B1
7680456 Muhammad et al. Mar 2010 B2
7742790 Konchitsky et al. Jun 2010 B2
7817808 Konchitsky et al. Oct 2010 B2
8019050 Mactavish et al. Sep 2011 B2
8249262 Chua et al. Aug 2012 B2
8290537 Lee et al. Oct 2012 B2
8325934 Kuo Dec 2012 B2
8379884 Horibe et al. Feb 2013 B2
8401200 Tiscareno et al. Mar 2013 B2
8442251 Jensen et al. May 2013 B2
8804974 Melanson Aug 2014 B1
8908877 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Dec 2014 B2
8948410 Van Leest Feb 2015 B2
20010053228 Jones Dec 2001 A1
20020003887 Zhang et al. Jan 2002 A1
20030063759 Brennan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072439 Gupta Apr 2003 A1
20030185403 Sibbald Oct 2003 A1
20040047464 Yu et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040120535 Woods Jun 2004 A1
20040165736 Hetherington et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167777 Hetherington et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040202333 Csermak et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040240677 Onishi et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040242160 Ichikawa et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264706 Ray et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004796 Trump et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018862 Fisher Jan 2005 A1
20050117754 Sakawaki Jun 2005 A1
20050207585 Christoph Sep 2005 A1
20050240401 Ebenezer Oct 2005 A1
20060035593 Leeds Feb 2006 A1
20060055910 Lee Mar 2006 A1
20060069556 Nadjar et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060153400 Fujita et al. Jul 2006 A1
20070030989 Kates Feb 2007 A1
20070033029 Sakawaki Feb 2007 A1
20070038441 Inoue et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047742 Taenzer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070053524 Haulick et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076896 Hosaka et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070154031 Avendano et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070258597 Rasmussen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070297620 Choy Dec 2007 A1
20080019548 Avendano Jan 2008 A1
20080101589 Horowitz et al. May 2008 A1
20080107281 Togami et al. May 2008 A1
20080144853 Sommerfeldt et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080177532 Greiss et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181422 Christoph Jul 2008 A1
20080226098 Haulick et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080240413 Mohammed et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080240455 Inoue et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080240457 Inoue et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090012783 Klein Jan 2009 A1
20090034748 Sibbald Feb 2009 A1
20090041260 Jorgensen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090046867 Clemow Feb 2009 A1
20090060222 Jeong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090080670 Solbeck et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090086990 Christoph Apr 2009 A1
20090175466 Elko et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090196429 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090220107 Every et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090238369 Ramakrishnan et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245529 Asada et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254340 Sun et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090290718 Kahn et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090296965 Kojima Dec 2009 A1
20090304200 Kim et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311979 Husted et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100014683 Maeda et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100014685 Wurm Jan 2010 A1
20100061564 Clemow et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069114 Lee et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082339 Konchitsky et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098263 Pan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098265 Pan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100124335 Wessling et al. May 2010 A1
20100124336 Shridhar et al. May 2010 A1
20100124337 Wertz et al. May 2010 A1
20100131269 Park et al. May 2010 A1
20100142715 Goldstein et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100150367 Mizuno Jun 2010 A1
20100158330 Guissin et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100166203 Peissig et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100195838 Bright Aug 2010 A1
20100195844 Christoph et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100207317 Iwami et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100246855 Chen Sep 2010 A1
20100266137 Sibbald et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272276 Carreras et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272283 Carreras et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274564 Bakalos et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100284546 DeBrunner et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291891 Ridgers et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100296666 Lin Nov 2010 A1
20100296668 Lee et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310086 Magrath et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322430 Isberg Dec 2010 A1
20110007907 Park et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110106533 Yu May 2011 A1
20110129098 Delano et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110130176 Magrath et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142247 Fellers et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144984 Konchitsky Jun 2011 A1
20110158419 Theverapperuma et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110206214 Christoph et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110222698 Asao et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110249826 Van Leest Oct 2011 A1
20110288860 Schevciw et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110293103 Park et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110299695 Nicholson Dec 2011 A1
20110305347 Wurm Dec 2011 A1
20110317848 Ivanov et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120135787 Kusunoki et al. May 2012 A1
20120140917 Nicholson et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120140942 Loeda Jun 2012 A1
20120140943 Hendrix et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120148062 Scarlett et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120155666 Nair Jun 2012 A1
20120170766 Alves et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120207317 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215519 Park et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120250873 Bakalos et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120259626 Li et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120263317 Shin et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120300958 Klemmensen Nov 2012 A1
20120300960 Mackay et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120308021 Kwatra et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308024 Alderson et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308025 Hendrix et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308026 Kamath et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308027 Kwatra Dec 2012 A1
20120308028 Kwatra et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120310640 Kwatra et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130010982 Elko et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130083939 Fellers et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130243198 Van Rumpt Sep 2013 A1
20130243225 Yokota Sep 2013 A1
20130272539 Kim et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130287218 Alderson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130287219 Hendrix et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130301842 Hendrix et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301846 Alderson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301847 Alderson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301848 Zhou et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301849 Alderson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130343556 Bright Dec 2013 A1
20130343571 Rayala et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140044275 Goldstein et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140050332 Nielsen et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140072134 Po et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140086425 Jensen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140177851 Kitazawa et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140211953 Alderson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140270222 Hendrix et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140270223 Li et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150092953 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
102011013343 Sep 2012 DE
1880699 Jan 2008 EP
1947642 Jul 2008 EP
2133866 Dec 2009 EP
2216774 Aug 2010 EP
2237573 Oct 2010 EP
2395500 Dec 2011 EP
2395501 Dec 2011 EP
2401744 Nov 2004 GB
2455821 Jun 2009 GB
2455824 Jun 2009 GB
2455828 Jun 2009 GB
2484722 Apr 2012 GB
H06-186985 Jul 1994 JP
WO 9911045 Mar 1999 WO
WO 03015074 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03015275 Feb 2003 WO
WO 2004009007 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004017303 Feb 2004 WO
WO 2007007916 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007113487 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2010117714 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2012134874 Oct 2012 WO
WO 2015038255 Mar 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (70)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,124, filed Mar. 12, 2015, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/029,159, filed Sep. 17, 2013, Li, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/228,322, filed Mar. 28, 2014, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,504, filed Feb. 8, 2013, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,832, filed Dec. 20, 2012, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/724,656, filed Dec. 21, 2012, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/252,235, filed Apr. 14, 2014, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,013, filed Aug. 15, 2013, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/924,935, filed Jun. 24, 2013, Hellman.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/896,526, filed May 17, 2013, Naderi.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,955, filed Dec. 10, 2013, Alderson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,777, filed Dec. 10, 2013, Alderson et al.
Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al., “On Maximum Achievable Noise Reduction in ANC Systems”,2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, Mar. 14-19, 2010, pp. 349-352, Dallas, TX, US.
Cohen, Israel, “Noise Spectrum Estimation in Adverse Environments: Improved Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-11, vol. 11, Issue 5, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Ryan, et al., “Optimum Near-Field Performance of Microphone Arrays Subject to a Far-Field Beampattern Constraint”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Nov. 2000, pp. 2248-2255, 108 (5), Pt. 1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Cohen, et al., “Noise Estimation by Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging for Robust Speech Enhancement”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 2002, pp. 12-15, vol. 9, No. 1, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Martin, Rainer, “Noise Power Spectral Density Estimation Based on Optimal Smoothing and Minimum Statistics”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Jul. 2001, pp. 504-512, vol. 9, No. 5, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Martin, Rainer, “Spectral Subtraction Based on Minimum Statistics”, Signal Processing VII Theories and Applications, Proceedings of EUSIPCO-94, 7th European Signal Processing Conference, Sep. 13-16, 1994, pp. 1182-1185, vol. III, Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K.
Booij, et al., “Virtual sensors for local, three dimensional, broadband multiple-channel active noise control and the effects on the quiet zones”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA 2010, Sep. 20-22, 2010, pp. 151-166, Leuven.
Kuo, et al., “Residual noise shaping technique for active noise control systems”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 (3), Mar. 1994, pp. 1665-1668.
Lopez-Caudana, Edgar Omar, “Active Noise Cancellation: The Unwanted Signal and The Hybrid Solution”, Adaptive Filtering Applications, Dr. Lino Garcia (Ed.), Jul. 2011, pp. 49-84, ISBN: 978-953-307-306-4, InTech.
Senderowicz, et al., “Low-Voltage Double-Sampled Delta-Sigma Converters”, IEEE Journal on Solid-State Circuits, Dec. 1997, pp. 1907-1919, vol. 32, No. 12, Piscataway, NJ.
Hurst, et al., “An improved double sampling scheme for switched-capacitor delta-sigma modulators”, 1992 IEEE Int. Symp. On Circuits and Systems, May 10-13, 1992, vol. 3, pp. 1179-1182, San Diego, CA.
Parkins, et al., “Narrowband and broadband active control in an enclosure using the acoustic energy density”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Jul. 2000, pp. 192-203, vol. 108, issue 1, US.
Feng, et al.., “A broadband self-tuning active noise equaliser”, Signal Processing, Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 251-256, vol. 62, No. 2, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, NL.
Zhang, et al., “A Robust Online Secondary Path Modeling Method with Auxiliary Noise Power Scheduling Strategy and Norm Constraint Manipulation”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE Service Center, Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 45-53, vol. 11, No. 1, NY.
Lopez-Gaudana, et al., “A hybrid active noise cancelling with secondary path modeling”, 51st Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, MWSCAS 2008, Aug. 10-13, 2008, pp. 277-280, IEEE, Knoxville, TN.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/017962, mailed on Jun. 10, 2014, 12 pages. (pp. 1-12 in pdf).
U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,567, filed Dec. 22, 2014, Kwatra, et al.
Widrow, B., et al., Adaptive Noise Cancelling; Principles and Applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, Dec. 1975, pp. 1692-1716, vol. 63, No. 13, IEEE, New York, NY, US.
Morgan, et al., A Delayless Subband Adaptive Filter Architecture, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, IEEE Service Center, Aug. 1995, pp. 1819-1829, vol. 43, No. 8, New York, NY, US.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/686,353, filed Nov. 27, 2012, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,160, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,367, filed Dec. 3, 2012, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,119, filed Dec. 20, 2012, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,718, filed Dec. 27, 2012, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,141, filed Dec. 28, 2012, Zhou, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,018, filed Mar. 4, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/787,906, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,931, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Lu et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,979, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,007, filed Aug. 15, 2013, Hendrix, et al.
Pfann, et al., “LMS Adaptive Filtering with Delta-Sigma Modulated Input Signals,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Apr. 1998, pp. 95-97, vol. 5, No. 4, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Toochinda, et al. “A Single-Input Two-Output Feedback Formulation for ANC Problems,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference, Jun. 2001, pp. 923-928, vol. 2, Arlington, VA.
Kuo, et al., “Active Noise Control: A Tutorial Review,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 1999, pp. 943-973, vol. 87, No. 6, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Johns, et al., “Continuous-Time LMS Adaptive Recursive Filters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Jul. 1991, pp. 769-778, vol. 38, No. 7, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Shoval, et al., “Comparison of DC Offset Effects in Four LMS Adaptive Algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Processing, Mar. 1995, pp. 176-185, vol. 42, Issue 3, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Mali, Dilip, “Comparison of DC Offset Effects on LMS Algorithm and its Derivatives,” International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, May 2009, pp. 323-328, vol. 1, No. 1, Academy Publisher.
Kates, James M., “Principles of Digital Dynamic Range Compression,” Trends in Amplification, Spring 2005, pp. 45-76, vol. 9, No. 2, Sage Publications.
Gao, et al., “Adaptive Linearization of a Loudspeaker,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 14-17, 1991, pp. 3589-3592, Toronto, Ontario, CA.
Silva, et al., “Convex Combination of Adaptive Filters With Different Tracking Capabilities,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 15-20, 2007, pp. III 925-928, vol. 3, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Akhtar, et al., “A Method for Online Secondary Path Modeling in Active Noise Control Systems,” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 23-26, 2005, pp. 264-267, vol. 1, Kobe, Japan.
Davari, et al., “A New Online Secondary Path Modeling Method for Feedforward Active Noise Control Systems,” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Apr. 21-24, 2008, pp. 1-6, Chengdu, China.
Lan, et al., “An Active Noise Control System Using Online Secondary Path Modeling With Reduced Auxiliary Noise,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 2002, pp. 16-18, vol. 9, Issue 1, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Liu, et al., “Analysis of Online Secondary Path Modeling With Auxiliary Noise Scaled by Residual Noise Signal,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, Nov. 2010, pp. 1978-1993, vol. 18, Issue 8, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Black, John W., “An Application of Side-Tone in Subjective Tests of Microphones and Headsets”, Project Report No. NM 001 064.01.20, Research Report of the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Feb. 1, 1954, 12 pages (pp. 1-12 in pdf), Pensacola, FL, US.
Peters, Robert W., “The Effect of High-Pass and Low-Pass Filtering of Side-Tone Upon Speaker Intelligibility”, Project Report No. NM 001 064.01.25, Research Report of the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Aug. 16, 1954, 13 pages (pp. 1-13 in pdf), Pensacola, FL, US.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,814, filed Mar. 5, 2014, Kaller, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,537, filed Mar. 14, 2014, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,589, filed Mar. 14, 2014, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
Lane, et al., “Voice Level: Autophonic Scale, Perceived Loudness, and the Effects of Sidetone”,The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Feb. 1961, pp. 160-167, vol. 33, No. 2., Cambridge, MA, US.
Liu, et al., “Compensatory Responses to Loudness-shifted Voice Feedback During Production of Mandarin Speech”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Oct. 2007, pp. 2405-2412, vol. 122, No. 4.
Paepcke, et al., “Yelling in the Hall: Using Sidetone to Address a Problem with Mobile Remote Presence Systems”, Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Oct. 16-19, 2011, 10 pages (pp. 1-10 in pdf), Santa Barbara, CA, US.
Therrien, et al., “Sensory Attenuation of Self-Produced Feedback: The Lombard Effect Revisited”, Plos One, Nov. 2012, pp. 1-7, vol. 7, Issue 11, e49370, Ontario, Canada.
Campbell, Mikey, “Apple looking into self-adjusting earbud headphones with noise cancellation tech”, Apple Insider, Jul. 4, 2013, pp. 1-10 (10 pages in pdf), downloaded on May 14, 2014 from http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/07/04/apple-looking-into-self-adjusting-earbud-headphones-with-noise-cancellation-tech.
Jin, et al. “A simultaneous equation method-based online secondary path modeling algorithm for active noise control”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 455-474, vol. 303, No. 3-5, London, GB.
Erkelens, et al., “Tracking of Nonstationary Noise Based on Data-Driven Recursive Noise Power Estimation”, IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, Aug. 2008, pp. 1112-1123, vol. 16, No. 6, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Rao, et al., “A Novel Two State Single Channel Speech Enhancement Technique”, India Conference (INDICON) 2011 Annual IEEE, IEEE, Dec. 2011, 6 pages (pp. 1-6 in pdf), Piscataway, NJ, US.
Rangachari, et al., “A noise-estimation algorithm for highly non-stationary environments”, Speech Communication, Feb. 2006, pp. 220-231, vol. 48, No. 2. Elsevier Science Publishers.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/734,321, filed Jun. 9, 2015, Alderson, et al.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140270224 A1 Sep 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61787641 Mar 2013 US