Amphiphilic Minichannel Surface Structures to Enhance Heat Transfer Coefficient

Abstract

A structure for enhancing condensation and wetting dynamics includes a substrate and a plurality of grooves formed in the substrate, forming fins. The fins having fin tops and a coating is applied over the fin tops.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention

The invention relates to forming amphiphilic minichannel surfaces and coating the surfaces to improve condensate formation and subsequent heat transfer.

Description of the Related Art

It is presently known to coat industrial equipment with coatings to improve heat transfer away from the equipment. An exemplary method is to coat the equipment in a thin coating of polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon®). While this coating method adequately conducts heat from the equipment, the coating must be necessarily thin to adequate conduct the heat and not form a thermally insulating barrier, but this thin coating does not last in an industrially active environment, resulting in a loss of thermal conductivity and/or requiring re-applications of the coating on a regular basis.

It would be beneficial to provide a heat conducting surface that is efficient and durable.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.

In one embodiment, the present invention is a structure for enhancing condensation and wetting dynamics. The structure includes a substrate and a plurality of grooves formed in the substrate, forming fins. The fins having fin tops and a coating is applied over the fin tops.

In another embodiment, the present invention is a structure for enhancing heat transfer away from a substrate. The structure includes a thermally conductive substrate and a plurality of grooves formed in the thermally conductive substrate, forming fins. The fins having fin tops and a coating is applied over the fin tops. The coating has a lower thermal conductivity than the substrate.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a six inch tube machined with fins according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged top plan view of the tube of FIG. 1, with a polymer amphiphilic coating applied to the fins;

FIG. 3 is a schematic side elevational view showing the geometry of the tube of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4A is a schematic side elevational view showing the geometry of an uncoated tube;

FIG. 4B is a schematic side elevational view showing the geometry of a coated tube;

FIG. 4C is a schematic side elevational view showing the geometry of a coated tube with different geometry;

FIG. 5A is a high speed image showing wetting for the profile to the left;

FIG. 5B is another high speed image showing wetting for the profile to the left;

FIG. 5C is yet another high speed image showing wetting for the profile to the left;

FIG. 5D is still another high speed image showing wetting for the profile to the left;

FIG. 6A is a graph showing experimental results for the profiles of FIGS. 4A-4C and 5A-5D of droplet departure diameter in white bars and frequency in gray bars;

FIG. 6B is a graph showing experimental results for the profiles of FIGS. 4A-4C and 5A-5D of heat transfer coefficient (HTC);

FIG. 7A is a graph showing predicted wetting states for a horizontally-oriented tube; and

FIG. 7B is a graph showing predicted wetting states for a vertically-oriented tube.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the drawings, like numerals indicate like elements throughout. Certain terminology is used herein for convenience only and is not to be taken as a limitation on the present invention. The terminology includes the words specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof and words of similar import. The embodiments illustrated below are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. These embodiments are chosen and described to best explain the principle of the invention and its application and practical use and to enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention.

Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments necessarily mutually exclusive of other embodiments. The same applies to the term “implementation.”

As used in this application, the word “exemplary” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Rather, use of the word exemplary is intended to present concepts in a concrete fashion.

The word “about” is used herein to include a value of +/−10 percent of the numerical value modified by the word “about” and the word “generally” is used herein to mean “without regard to particulars or exceptions.”

Additionally, the term “or” is intended to mean an inclusive “or” rather than an exclusive “or”. That is, unless specified otherwise, or clear from context, “X employs A or B” is intended to mean any of the natural inclusive permutations. That is, if X employs A; X employs B; or X employs both A and B, then “X employs A or B” is satisfied under any of the foregoing instances. In addition, the articles “a” and “an” as used in this application and the appended claims should generally be construed to mean “one or more” unless specified otherwise or clear from context to be directed to a singular form.

Unless explicitly stated otherwise, each numerical value and range should be interpreted as being approximate as if the word “about” or “approximately” preceded the value of the value or range.

The use of figure numbers and/or figure reference labels in the claims is intended to identify one or more possible embodiments of the claimed subject matter in order to facilitate the interpretation of the claims. Such use is not to be construed as necessarily limiting the scope of those claims to the embodiments shown in the corresponding figures.

It should be understood that the steps of the exemplary methods set forth herein are not necessarily required to be performed in the order described, and the order of the steps of such methods should be understood to be merely exemplary. Likewise, additional steps may be included in such methods, and certain steps may be omitted or combined, in methods consistent with various embodiments of the present invention.

Although the elements in the following method claims, if any, are recited in a particular sequence with corresponding labeling, unless the claim recitations otherwise imply a particular sequence for implementing some or all of those elements, those elements are not necessarily intended to be limited to being implemented in that particular sequence.

Condensation across finned aluminum tubes was studied to demonstrate the use of amphiphilic minichannel (AMC) surface structures to enhance heat transfer coefficient (HTC). The AMCs are extremely robust as well as cheap and easy to fabricate using traditional methods. The 3D structures use mixed-wettability to change surface wetting, leading to dynamic variations in the condensate formation and removal process. Various geometric designs have been fabricated and tested, showing up to 50% enhancement in HTC compared to surfaces without AMCs. Two distinct wetting behaviors have been observed, for vertical and horizontal extending surfaces, both of which can be predicted accurately using developed models.

FIG. 1 shows a six-inch-long grooved aluminum tube 110 before coating, where the grooved surface 112 is a single helical channel milled into the tube 110. FIG. 2 shows a close up of a tube 110 after coating with a polymer, such as silicone rubber 120. FIG. 3 shows a cross section of the amphiphilic channel geometry with the following parameters:

• • h=the total height of a fin formed by milling adjacent channels on each side of the fin.
  • w=the width of the channel.
  • d=the thickness of the fin.
  • δ_coat=the thickness of the coating on the fin.
  • h_B=the length of the coating extending downwardly from the tip of the fin.
  • h_A=the uncoated height of the fin (h-h_B).

In an exemplary embodiment, h, w, and d can be between about 0.1 mm and about 5 mm; δ_coat can be between about 0.1 microns and about 200 microns; h_B/h can be between about 0.01 and about 0.99.

In general, referring to FIGS. 1-3, the present invention is a tubular substrate 110 with a plurality of helical grooves 112 formed in the substrate 110, forming fins 114 that extend outwardly from the surface of tube 110. The fins 114 have fin tops 116. A coating 120 is applied over the fin tops 116.

In an exemplary embodiment, the substrate 110 comprises a metal, such as, for example, aluminum, and has a first, higher thermal conductivity and has a hydrophilic surface. As shown in FIG. 1, the plurality of grooves 112 has a helical shape, although grooves 112 can be other shapes, such as longitudinally straight or radially straight. The structure of the substrate 110 being tubular is important due to the fact that, for horizontally running tubular substrates (i.e. pipes) 110, condensate that forms on the top of the substrate 110 eventually will roll down either side of the substrate 110 to an underneath portion of the substrate 110, and will eventually fall from the substrate 110, providing room for more condensate to form on substrate 110 and repeat the process, removing heat from the substrate 110 in the process.

The coating 120 comprises a polymer/rubber material having a lower thermal conductivity than the substrate 110 and is a hydrophobic surface. A ratio of a height of each fin below the coating versus a distance between adjacent fins is shown in FIG. 3 as h_B/w and can be between about 0.1 and about 10.

FIGS. 4A-4C and 5A-5D show scale drawings of various geometries of fins and coatings tested, including two uncoated samples (FIG. 4A and FIG. 5A) where channel gaps and heights vary from 0.2-2.0 mm. All samples were tested during condensation of water vapor and at a fixed supersaturation, with small measurable amounts of noncondensable gases. For the configurations of FIGS. 5A-5D, the surfaces were imaged using high speed cameras and condensate removal (and heat transfer rate) were calculated from motion tracking of falling droplets.

FIG. 5A-D show several select images from high speed visualization during condensation experiments. The effect of adding the coating 120 on droplet formation can be seen in 5A and 5B, while FIGS. 5C and 5D compare the behavior of the ‘smallest’ and ‘largest’ AMCs tested here. Two uncoated designs (FIG. 4A) and five AMC designs (FIGS. 4B, 4C and FIG. 5B-5D) were tested, and the results of droplet tracking and HTC can be seen in FIGS. 6A and 6B for a six inch long tube 110. The bare grooved metal (A₀) behaved as expected with hydrophilic wetting throughout the entire grooved structure, large diameter droplets departed infrequently. However, two distinct (and robust) modes of condensation were observed for the AMC designs: (1) a stable wetted-film spreading mode and (2) a dynamic cyclical draining mode. The “spreading” A_0.9 and B_0.9 surfaces (FIGS. 5C and 5B, respectively) had a reduced departure diameter and increased frequency, while exhibiting a relatively ordered spacing between pendant droplets. The surfaces also demonstrated the highest HTC. The “emerging” B_1.5, C_1.5, and D_2.3 surfaces (FIGS. 4B, 4C, and 5D, respectively) displayed much more chaotic behavior of coalescence, draining, and emergence processes. FIGS. 7A and 7B show the predicted wetting behavior of flat horizontal and vertical AMCs, mimicking the top/bottom and sides of the tubes. The predictions show that the A_0.9 and B_0.9 surfaces can maintain a stable wetted state on all sides while feeding a stationary pendant droplet. The other three surfaces would preferentially emerge and create shorter slugs that cannot bridge the circumference of the tube. This leads to the dynamic instabilities seen for these examples.

The Ph.D. dissertation entitled “Condensation on Amphiphilic Surfaces” by co-inventor Rebecca L. Winter is attached as an Appendix hereto and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

It will be further understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts which have been described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of this invention may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the following claims.

Claims

1. A structure for enhancing condensation and wetting dynamics comprising: a tubular substrate;a channel formed in the substrate, forming fins, the fins having fin tops; anda coating over the fin tops.

2. The structure according to claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises aluminum.

3. The structure according to claim 1, wherein the channel has a helical shape.

4. The structure according to claim 1, wherein the coating comprises a rubber.

5. The structure according to claim 1, wherein, when a ratio of a height of each fin below the coating versus a distance between adjacent fins is between about 0.1 and about 10.

6. The structure according to claim 1, wherein a thickness of the coating is between about 0.1 and about 200 microns.

7. The structure according to claim 1, wherein a ratio of a total height of each of the fins versus a height of each of the fin tops is between about 0.01 and about 0.99.

8. A structure for enhancing heat transfer away from a substrate comprising: a thermally conductive tubular substrate;a channel formed in the thermally conductive substrate, forming fins, the fins having fin tops; anda coating over the fin tops, the coating having a lower thermal conductivity than the substrate.

9. The structure according to claim 8, wherein the substrate comprises a metal.

10. The structure according to claim 8, wherein the coating comprises a polymer.

11. The structure according to claim 8, wherein the substrate comprises a hydrophilic surface.

12. The structure according to claim 8, wherein the coating comprises a hydrophobic surface.

13. The structure according to claim 8, wherein the structure generates a drop diameter less than 6 mm.

14. The structure according to claim 8, wherein the structure generates a drop frequency greater than 0.4 drops per second over a six inch length of the tube.

15. An amphiphilic microchannel tube comprising: the tube having an exterior surface comprising: a single helical channel formed in the exterior surface, forming a plurality of fins extending outwardly from the surface, each of the plurality of fins having: a fin height; anda top portion; anda hydrophobic coating covering the fin height.