The invention relates to power amplifiers and more particularly to a Class AB power amplification which offers good linearity and low current consumption.
The development of wireless mobile communications and Radio Frequency (RF) standards have entailed the need of linear Power Amplifiers (PA) while reducing the power consumption on the battery.
Some techniques are already known for improving the efficiency of RF power amplifiers, based on the use of complex circuits, sophisticated linearization circuits and feedback loop.
Another simple structure which is known is based on the class AB power amplifier having an input 6 and an output 7, such as illustrated in
a and 2b are flow charts respectively illustrating both the current consumption Icons (as a function of the output power PPout) and the gain Gm of such amplifier depending on the size of the transistor. It can be seen that the current consumption follows a curve that is function of the input RF swing as presented in
When one considers the situation of high levels of the input signal or, in other words when the output power becomes higher, one determines the particular size of the transistor accordingly, by considering current capabilities (electromigration for instance).
The Power Gain (PG) is mainly given by the ratio between the output voltage and the input voltage. Typically PG is around 8-10 dB. Moreover, because of a possible “oversizing”, the typical gain (or gm) for a MOS transistor is not linear anymore with the size, as illustrated in
The drawback resulting from a high size of the transistor comes from the fact that the latter then shows an efficiency (Power Amplifier Efficiency PAE) which is no longer optimized because of higher quiescent current Iq. Linearity is also an issue because of too much capacitance at the transistor ports.
Clearly, the power amplifier is sized at high power but not at low power which represents 80% of the time.
There is therefore a dilemma to be considered with the simple amplification structure of
Either the designer focuses on the power consumption and the transistor is then (under)sized so as to only draw minimal quiescent current Iq.
Or conversely, the designers may decide to (over)size the transistor so as to generate a high amount of power Pout, thus increasing the value of the quiescent current Iq.
There is therefore a desire for a new circuit which aims at reducing the power consumption and particularly Iq and also shows a high linearity even at high level of output power Pout.
Such is the aim of the present invention.
It is an object of the present invention to provide the architecture of an amplification circuit which offers good linearity and low current consumption.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a Class AB amplification circuit.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a AB amplification circuit which is adapted for the design of Radio Frequency amplifiers for wireless communications.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a RF amplification circuit which can be used in a mobile telephone.
These and other objects of the invention are achieved by means of a power amplifier circuit comprising:
By activating or disactivating one or more of the n cascode circuits, the total size of the amplification components can be adapted to the value of the output power to generate.
In one embodiment, each of the second transistor is biased, when activated by the control circuit, in class AB showing a quiescent current Iq.
In one embodiment, the sensing means comprises:
The invention also achieves a power amplification circuit comprising
In one embodiment, the a third transistor is mounted as a cascode transistor on the top of both first and second transistors.
The invention is adapted to the design of a RF amplification circuit for wireless communications and particularly useful for realizing a mobile telephone.
Other features of one or more embodiments of the invention will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
a and 2b are flow charts illustrating both the current Icons and the gain Gm of the amplifier of
a and 3b illustrate the general principle of a so-called Deep Class AB Cascode Power amplifier based on a “variable size” transistor.
a and 5b illustrate the result of a simulation for a 2.5 Ghz power amplifier.
There is now described improvements which can be brought to RF amplification circuits and particularly to the conventional deep Class AB cascode amplification circuit. In the following GND will refer to a first reference voltage and Vdd is a second reference voltage which may correspond to either a positive voltage or a negative voltage, thus determining the particular type of the transistor to consider. For instance, when Vdd is a positive voltage, the MOS transistors will be NMOS transistors while, if Vdd correspond to a negative voltage, PMOS transistors will have to be considered.
Typically, the embodiments described below are particularly adapted to the design of Radio Frequency amplification circuits used in modern mobile telecommunication equipments, requiring a high degree of linearity, together with a low consumption of current.
This is achieved by the use of a new amplification circuit, illustrated in
By construction, such “variable size” transistor, when used in a Class AB structure, allows to take advantage of different Icons (Pout) curves so as to leave the operating point on the tangent shown in
For that purpose, the size of “transistor” 10 is varied, in a controllable way, with the targeted power. More particularly, there is included control means for increasing the size of transistor 10 with the reaching of a percentage of Iq (Icons), which is given by linearity consideration (limit between deep Class AB and ClassAB for instance)
Doing this, both the quiescent current and Icons increase with Pin (and Pout) while ensuring power capabilities, respecting targeted PAE.
At low power, PAE is better because quiescent current Iq decreases also.
The main advantage regarding classical envelope restoration is that Icons is an image of Output Power (and input one at large signal), so Icons is in phase with output swing.
Two particular embodiments will be particularly considered, a first embodiment taking advantage of a series of MOS transistors coupled in parallel and all biased in Class AB structures (I) and a second embodiment (II) showing the combination of a MOS transistor biased in class AB and combined with a class A structure.
The circuit comprises an input 100 receiving the input signal and connected to a first input of a capacitor 101 having a second input connected to the gate (G0) of a transistor MO 102 and also to the gate (G1, G2, . . . Gn) of a series of n MOS transistors 110-1 to 110-n, the source of which being connected to a reference voltage Gnd.
Transistors M1-Mn have their drains which are respectively connected to the source of an associated transistors 120-1-120-n, the drain of which being connected to the output of the amplifier, that is to say to a first input of an inductor 140 having a second input connected to reference voltage Vdd, and also to a first input of capacitor 160, the second input of which being connected to an output 700 (Rfout) and to the load ZL 5. Therefore, the amplification circuit comprises a set of n cascode circuits, each cascode circuit comprising a first transistor (110-1, 110-2, . . . 110-n) and a second transistor (120-1, 120-2, . . . 120-n).
Likewise, the drain of transistor M 102 is connected to the source of a transistor Mc0103 having its drain connected to Vdd via a sensing circuit 130 connected to reference voltage Vdd. Sensing circuit 130 includes a first branch two resistors 131 and 132 connected in series between the reference voltage Vdd and the drain of transistor Mc0103. The voltage across one of the two resistors connected in series, namely resistor 132 is sensed and forwarded to a control unit 150 (so-called Droop circuit), having a set of output lends which are coupled to the gates Gc1, Gc2 . . . Gcn of the sequence of NMOS transistors 120-1, 120-2 . . . 120-n
Therefore, as seen in
The TOP schematic is presented in
With respect to
It can therefore be seen that the first embodiment advantageously saves power consumption at low power for ClassAB PA. In addition it takes small area and can be implemented in pure CMOS technology. Furthermore, there is no need of a specific digital circuit to tune the stages. This can be done in pure analog domain. It can be implemented as a standalone circuit.
The second embodiment which is described below is particularly adapted for handling the more recent modulation techniques, having high PAPR (Peak to Average Power Ratio) (6-10 dB), and which require very good linearity combined with low power consumption as well.
For that purpose, there is described a twin power amplifier which takes advantage of the property of an OFDM signal having a high PAPR to statistically distribute the power around Pout average and up to Pout maximum, as illustrated in
Therefore, as illustrated in
In order to take advantage of both circuits, there is proposed a twin power amplifier, as illustrated in
On one hand, lower size MOS transistor M1 is biased in class A and receives the RF input at its gate via a capacitor 801.
On the other hand, MOS transistor M2 is biased in Class AB and also receives the RF input at its gate via a capacitor 901.
Therefore, the ClassA and AB are merged together. When the input signal increases the ClassAB contribution increases while Vout from Class A decreases (compression). The total gain is smoothed.
The twin structure of
Regarding the determination of the size, it is proposed, in one particular embodiment, to provide the Class A part with, for instance ⅓ of the total area, the remaining ⅔ being allocated to the Class AB part. Clearly, those values can be changed but the skilled man will take care to keep the contribution of each part should be balanced. The biasing points also in an opposite ratio. Doing this, if the Class A part with ⅓ of the total area (so ⅓ of the total Gain (gm)) has a high biasing point, its contribution to the gain is high. A Class A PA has a gain proportional to the biasing point. Now, if the Class AB part which represents ⅔ of the total area, so ⅔ of the total available gain, has a lower biasing point, this part will have a lower gain than the maximum available gain (given by the area).
Now considering the determination of the ratio and biasing point those are chosen so that each part contributes to the same power gain. Doing this, when the input power increases the Class AB part contribution becomes higher and higher producing an expansion of its gain but the Class A part which is sized lower will compress earlier reducing its intrinsic gain. The two behaviours compensate the gain expansion making it smaller and finally pushing the total compression point P1db at a higher value. This increases the linearity without degrading the consumption. The gain expansion is reduced and smoothed on a larger input power range. This range corresponds in fact to the PAPR. So, the power gain, which is the gain at the targeted output power can be seen constant. The compression point is then rejected to a higher value than a pure Class AB PA. The advantage is that the consumption behaviour is still the one of a Class AB at high power but keeping the linearity.
Considering now
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11368002 | Jan 2011 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/000351 | 1/26/2012 | WO | 00 | 1/2/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/100947 | 8/2/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4458213 | Quan | Jul 1984 | A |
6448616 | Perugupalli et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6501334 | Corsi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
8150343 | Ramachandra Reddy | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8188788 | Lee | May 2012 | B2 |
20050225392 | Ivanov | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20100141337 | Chen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100279641 | Lu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 858 161 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1 993 200 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2009009652 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in corresponding International application No. PCT/EP2012/000351, date of mailing Apr. 4, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140197893 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61454076 | Mar 2011 | US |