The present disclosure relates generally to an amplifier, and more particularly to inductive peaking of the amplifier.
Inductive peaking is used in many amplifier applications, e.g., broadband amplifiers, to increase the bandwidth. The increased bandwidth is achieved by inserting inductors and utilizing the increase in inductor impedance with frequency to compensate for the effects of decreasing gain with frequency. However, inductors occupy a relatively large area of an integrated circuit chip.
Reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The making and using of various embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present disclosure provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use, and do not limit the scope of the disclosure.
Each stage has an output loading capacitance C shown as dotted lines. The output loading capacitance C is not a separate physical element added to the amplifier 100, but rather a capacitance observed at each output node of each stage, originating mostly from the next (following) stage (or circuit). In other embodiments, a separate physical capacitor is added to the amplifier 100 at the output node of a stage. The N stages of the amplifier 100 share inductors Ln in the same current phase for inductive peaking. The amplifier 100 includes 2 inductors Ln in this example. In other embodiments, the number of inductors Ln is greater than 2.
Each stage has two transistors (e.g., T11 and T12 for the first stage 202, T21 and T22 for the second stage 204, . . . , etc.) receiving input signals (e.g., Vin and Vip for the first stage 202, Vop1 and Von1 for the second stage 204, . . . , etc.). The two transistors of each stage are coupled to two resistors R, input nodes (e.g., nodes for Vip and Vin), and a current source I. The resistors R of each stage are coupled to respective output nodes (e.g., nodes for Vop1 and Von1 ). The N stages of the amplifier 200 share two inductors Ln, where each inductor Ln is coupled to a respective resistor R (one of the two resistors) in each stage for inductive peaking of the amplifier 200 as shown in
The transfer function of each stage (e.g., 202, 204, 206, 208) is given by the following equation:
where L is the inductance of Ln (for a single stage), C is the capacitance of an output node (of the single stage), R is the resistance (for a single stage), a damping factor
and gm is a transconductance of one transistor (of the single stage), e.g., T11 or T12.
For example, Vinput is the difference between the two inputs Vip and Vin, and Voutput is the difference between the two outputs Vop1 and Von1 in the first stage 202. For the amplifier 200, the damping factor and elements values such as resistance and capacitance are selected in order to have a stable output signal. In one example, the damping factor is selected as
which makes the inductance L=R2C/2. More details regarding the damping factor are provided as described below. The amplifier 200 can be used in various applications, e.g., broadband operational amplifier, limiting amplifier, trans-impedance amplifier, etc.
with the damping factor
Another waveform 304 represents gain vs. frequency for another exemplary 3-stage amplifier not sharing inductors (each stage has separate inductors). The waveform 302 indicates that having an inductance of Ln greater than L/3 shared among multiple stages result in unstable gain vs. frequency plot due to the damping factor less than
In
Another waveform 308 represents gain vs. frequency for another exemplary 3-stage amplifier not sharing inductors (each stage has separate inductors). The waveform 306 indicates that having an inductance of Ln less than L/3 shared among multiple stages result in reduced bandwidth due to the damping factor greater than
The amplifier 200 sharing inductance of Ln=L/N has a similar bandwidth as an amplifier not sharing inductors (each stage has separate inductors). For example, for an exemplary 2-stage amplifier sharing two L/2 inductors, the BW is about 21 GHz, while an exemplary amplifier not sharing inductors (using 4 inductors) has BW about 19.5 GHz. Also, for an exemplary 3-stage amplifier sharing two L/3 inductors, the BW is about 16.9 GHz, while an exemplary amplifier not sharing inductors (using 6 inductors) has BW about 16.7 GHz.
The waveform 402 shows that it takes a relatively longer time for the impulse response to stabilize.
A waveform 404 represents an impulse response vs. time for the exemplary 3-stage amplifier in
A waveform 406 represents an impulse response vs. time for another exemplary 3-stage amplifier not sharing inductors (each stage has separate inductors). The waveforms 404 and 406 show similar impulse responses.
A waveform 408 represents an impulse response vs. time for the exemplary 3-stage amplifier in
The waveform 408 indicates that the impulse response is relatively slower (due to reduced bandwidth).
The simulation results shown above in
At step 504, the number of stages N (N>1) is determined based on a gain specification. For example, if the gain specification is 30 dB and each stage gain is 10 dB, N=3 stages. At step 506, a single stage inductance L is calculated for inductive peaking to have a stable impulse response, e.g., based on a damping factor of about
For example, L=R2C/2=2.5 nH to have a damping factor of
given the above example values of elements R and C.
At step 508, a shared inductance, e.g., Ln in
A line 602 shows the inductor area when an amplifier does not share inductors among multiple stages (having separate inductors for inductive peaking). It shows that the inductor area increases linearly with the number of stages. A line 604 shows the inductor area when an amplifier shares inductors that has the same inductance L of a single stage. A line 606 shows the inductor area for the exemplary amplifier in
One aspect of this description relates to a method of sharing inductors for inductive peaking of an amplifier. The method includes calculating a single stage inductance of a single stage for inductive peaking in order to have a stable impulse response. The method further includes determining a number of stages for shared inductance for inductive peaking. The method further includes sharing at least two inductors having the shared inductance among the determined number of stages for inductive peaking.
Another aspect of this description relates to a method of sharing inductors for inductive peaking of an amplifier having at least two stages. The method includes determining a bandwidth of a single stage of the at least two stages, and determining a number of stages of the at least two stages. The method further includes calculating a single stage inductance of the single stage for inductive peaking in order to have a stable impulse response, and calculating a shared inductance for inductive peaking. The method further includes sharing at least two inductors having the shared inductance among the at least two stages for inductive peaking.
Still another aspect of this description relates to an amplifier including at least two inductors, and at least two stages. Each stage of the at least two stages includes a first resistor connected to a first inductor of the at least two inductors, and a second resistor connected to a second inductor of the at least two inductors. Each stage further includes a current source selectively connected to the first resistor and the second resistor. Each stage further includes a first transistor configured to selectively connect the first resistor to the current source, and a second transistor configured to selective connect the second resistor to the current source. Each inductor of the at least two inductor has an inductance value for inductive peaking equal to an inductance value for a single stage of the at least two stages divided by a number of stages of the at least two stages. The inductance value for the single stage is calculated based on a damping factor of a transfer function of the single stage.
A skilled person in the art will appreciate that there can be many embodiment variations of this disclosure. Although the embodiments and their features have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the embodiments. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, and composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosed embodiments, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present disclosure.
The above method embodiment shows exemplary steps, but they are not necessarily required to be performed in the order shown. Steps may be added, replaced, changed order, and/or eliminated as appropriate, in accordance with the spirit and scope of embodiment of the disclosure. Embodiments that combine different claims and/or different embodiments are within the scope of the disclosure and will be apparent to those skilled in the art after reviewing this disclosure.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/312,228, filed Dec. 6, 2011, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6952132 | Bhattacharjee et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7215194 | Kucharski et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7586372 | Voo | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7598788 | Cao | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7755426 | Kocaman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8625240 | Chung et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005119906 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140085009 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13312228 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14088521 | US |