This application claims the benefit of the filing date of British Patent Application No. 0509737.3 filed 12 May 2005 in the name of University of Bristol and entitled “Amplifiers”.
Amplifiers
The present invention relates to amplifiers, and in particular to class E amplifiers.
Modulation schemes such as Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) and Wideband Code-Division Multiple Access (W-CDMA) used in telecommunication systems operate with high peak-to-average power ratios. This places a requirement of a large dynamic linearity range for amplifiers used in the associated circuitry. Techniques currently employed in order for sufficient linearity to be obtained drastically reduce the power efficiency of such amplifiers.
One commonly used type of transmitter is the Envelope Elimination and Restoration, EER, transmitter.
The amplitude signal A(t) passes through an envelope modulator 6 and then a low pass filter 8. The output of the low pass filter 8 is an envelope signal E(t), which is used to control the bias voltage of a class E amplifier 10.
Such a state of the art EER transmitter is able to avoid some types of distortion typically associated with EER transmitters, but further distortion sources still exist. A major source of distortion comes from so-called “carrier feed though effects”. The carrier feed through effect is a result of the fact that the input signal to a class E amplifier sees a high-pass response, which has a complex impedence. The carrier feed through in a class E amplifier is higher than in a conventional linear amplifier such as class A or class AB, because the driver signal power level of the class E amplifier has to be high enough to ensure that a FET device within the amplifier can work as a switch. Carrier feed though effects result in the output of the transmitter having an undesirable DC offset.
The output, S(t), of the transmitter of
S(t)=E(t)cos(ωct+θ(t))+k cos(ωct+θ(t)+φ(E(t))) Equation 1
where S(t) is the output signal, E(t) is the envelope signal, θ(t) is the phase signal, φ(t) is the phase distortion, and k is a function which represents the DC offset voltage of the amplifier, as is deduced below.
The phase distortion φ(t) can be reduced using appropriate predistortion techniques, such that φ(t)=0. An example of this type of predistortion technique can be found in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 53, No. 5, September 2004, pages 1468-1479, “Orthogonal Polynomials for Power Amplifier Modelling and Predistorter Design”, by Raviv Raich, Hua Qian and G. Tong Zhou. When such appropriate predistortion techniques are used, and φ(t)=0, equation 1 becomes:
S(t)=(E(t)+k)cos(ωct+θ(t)) Equation 2
where S(t) is the output signal, E(t) is the envelope signal, θ(t) is the phase signal, and it can be seen that k represents the DC offset voltage of the amplifier. The value of k is dependent upon an amplifier's characteristics and settings.
It is therefore desirable to overcome the problem of DC offset in the output of EER transmitters.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a class E amplifier circuit comprising: a first class E amplifier connected to receive a first signal and operable to amplify the first signal and to output such an amplified first signal; a second class E amplifier connected to receive a second signal related to the first signal, and operable to amplify the second signal and to output such an amplified second signal; a combiner having first and second inputs connected to receive amplified signals from the first and second class E amplifiers respectively; and phase shift means operable to introduce a phase shift between signals for combination at the combiner.
An input signal, x(t), is input into a signal separation component 2, and converted to an amplitude signal A(t), and Cartesian signals I′(t) and Q′(t), as described in relation to
Two class E amplifiers are provided in the circuit of
Cartesian signals I′(t) and Q′(t) are up-converted by a quadrature up-converter 4 to a RF phase signal P(t), as described with reference to
The in-phase signal i(t) is supplied to the main amplifier 10. Envelope signal E(t) is supplied to the main amplifier 10 as a control signal, and is used to control the bias voltage of the main amplifier 10. Control of the bias voltage of the main amplifier serves to modulate the RF output of the amplifier 10 in accordance with the envelope signal E(t).
The output from the main amplifier can be represented by Equation 3:
S(t)=(E(t)+k)cos(ωct+θ(t)) Equation 3
where E(t) is the envelope signal, θ(t) is the phase signal, and k represents the DC offset level of the main amplifier.
The quadrature signal q(t) is supplied to the auxiliary amplifier 14.
The auxiliary amplifier 14 has a bias voltage, Vb, which has a magnitude such that the amplitude of the output signal of the auxiliary amplifier 14 is substantially equal to the DC offset level of the main amplifier 10.
In the embodiment of
The outputs of each amplifier 10, 14 are combined using the combiner 16, which has a 90° phase difference between inputs. The output of the main amplifier 10 is connected to an in-phase input, and the output of the auxiliary amplifier 14 is connected to a quadrature input of the combiner 16. The output from the auxiliary amplifier 14 is therefore phase shifted by a further 90° upon input to the quadrature input of the combiner 16. Thus, the signal R(t), having passed through the auxiliary amplifier 14, has an overall phase shift of 180°, or π, with respect to the output S(t) of the main amplifier. The signal S(t) has undergone no phase shift.
The signal R(t), having passed through the auxiliary amplifier, can be described in a similar manner to the output S(t) of the main amplifier, where the DC offset level of the auxiliary amplifier is k′, and there is an input bias voltage Vb replacing the envelope signal E(t), and a phase difference of 180° with respect to S(t):
R(t)=(Vb(t)+k′)cos(ωct+θ(t)+π) Equation 4
therefore
R(t)=−(Vb(t)+k′)cos(ωct+θ(t)) Equation 5
The amplitude of the signal R(t) is therefore Vb+k′.
Embodiments of the invention are intended to obtain the output, z(t), of the main amplifier without the DC offset, k. Therefore, the combination of S(t) and R(t) at the combiner 16 must give S(t) without the DC offset k:
z(t)=S(t)+R(t)=E(t)cos(ωct+θ(t)) Equation 6
(E(t)+k)cos(ωc(t)+θ(t))+(−Vb−k′)cos(ωc(t)+θ(t))=E(t)cos(ωct+θ(t)) Equation 7
E(t)+k−Vb−k′=E(t) Equation 8
Vb=k′−k, or k′=Vb+k Equation 9
Hence, Vb is set such that Vb=k′−k, and the combination of R(t) and S(t) results in a signal identical to S(t) but without the DC offset.
If two amplifiers with identical characteristics, and therefore identical DC offset levels such that k=k′, were to be used, then the required Vb is zero. However, perfectly matched amplifiers are extremely unlikely, and so in most practical embodiments, a bias voltage Vb will have to be applied to the auxiliary amplifier.
A second embodiment of the present invention is shown in
It will be appreciated that the 180° phase shift of the signal passing through the auxiliary amplifier could be applied in any number of ways, or any combination of the methods described above. For example, the 180° phase shifter 22 could be situated before the auxiliary amplifier, or a 90° phase shift could be introduced by a quadrature output of the splitter 12 and a further 90° phase shift could be introduced by a 90° phase shifter elsewhere.
It will also be appreciated that the splitter of the two described embodiments could be replaced by other means which provide the two class E amplifiers with related signals. These related signals could be related such that they are identical, or could simply be related such that they are similar enough for the desired result, discussed above, to be achieved. For example, the first and second signals could be identical but for a respective phase difference.
An example of the output signals S(t) and R(t) is shown in
The effective result of combining signals S(t) and R(t) is shown in
The embodiments of the Invention have been described with the assumption that the phase difference between the signals for combination at the combiner is 180°. In a more general example, however, the phase difference may not be exactly 180°. This would result in reduced cancellation of the DC offset, but there may be conditions when this is acceptable, even desirable.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0509737.3 | May 2005 | GB | national |