This invention pertains generally to the field of charge pumps and more particularly to improving the efficiency of charge pumps.
Charge pumps use a switching process to provide a DC output voltage larger or lower than its DC input voltage. In general, a charge pump will have a capacitor coupled to switches between an input and an output. During one clock half cycle, the charging half cycle, the capacitor couples in parallel to the input so as to charge up to the input voltage. During a second clock cycle, the transfer half cycle, the charged capacitor couples in series with the input voltage so as to provide an output voltage twice the level of the input voltage. This process is illustrated in
Charge pumps are used in many contexts. For example, they are used as peripheral circuits on flash and other non-volatile memories to generate many of the needed operating voltages, such as programming or erase voltages, from a lower power supply voltage. A number of charge pump designs, such as conventional Dickson-type pumps, are know in the art. But given the common reliance upon charge pumps, there is an on going need for improvements in pump design, particularly with respect to trying to reduce the amount of layout area and the efficiency of pumps.
A method of operating a charge pump circuit, where the charge pump has one or more stages each having one or more legs, including a first leg connected between an output node for the corresponding stage and an input node for the corresponding stage receiving an input voltage for the stage. The first leg has a first capacitor with a first plate connected to an internal node of the leg and a first output transistor connected between the internal node and the output node of the corresponding stage. The method includes: applying a first clock signal to a second plate of first capacitor, the first clock signals value alternating between a high value and a low value; and applying a second clock signal to the gate of the first output transistor. The second clock signal is of the same phase as the first clock signal and has a low value that is higher than the voltage at the source of the first output transistor when value of the first clock signal is low by a voltage offset not higher than the than the threshold of the first transistor.
Various aspects, advantages, features and embodiments of the present invention are included in the following description of exemplary examples thereof, which description should be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. All patents, patent applications, articles, other publications, documents and things referenced herein are hereby incorporated herein by this reference in their entirety for all purposes. To the extent of any inconsistency or conflict in the definition or use of terms between any of the incorporated publications, documents or things and the present application, those of the present application shall prevail.
The various aspects and features of the present invention may be better understood by examining the following figures, in which:
a is a simplified circuit diagram of the charging half cycle in a generic charge pump.
b is a simplified circuit diagram of the transfer half cycle in a generic charge pump.
The techniques presented here are widely applicable to various charge pump designs that use the threshold voltage cancelation signals for the switches used to prevent the backflow of charge after pump stages. In the following, the description will primarily be based on an exemplary embodiment using a voltage doubler-type of circuit, but the concepts can also be applied to other pump designs.
More information on prior art charge pumps, such as Dickson type pumps, and charge pumps generally, can be found, for example, in “Charge Pump Circuit Design” by Pan and Samaddar, McGraw-Hill, 2006, or “Charge Pumps: An Overview”, Pylarinos and Rogers, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto, available on the webpage “www.eecg.toronto.edu/˜kphang/ece1371/chargepumps.pdf”. Further information on various other charge pump aspects and designs can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,436,587; 6,370,075; 6,556,465; 6,760,262; 6,922,096; 7,030,683; 7,554,311; 7,368,979; 7,795,952; 7,135,910; 7,973,592; and 7,969,235; US Patent Publication numbers 2009-0153230-A1; 2009-0153232-A1; 2009-0315616-A1; 2009-0322413-A1; 2009-0058506-A1; US-2011-0148509-A1; 2007-0126494-A1; 2007-0139099-A1; 2008-0307342 A1; 2009-0058507 A1; 2012-0154023; 2012-0154022; and 2013-0063118; and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/618,482; 13/628,465; 13/886,066; and 13/921,072
Although the transistors in
Various methods are known to overcome this voltage drops. For example, the number of stages in each branch can be increased to just pump the voltage up higher and the later stages can be used to cancel the threshold voltages. Another example could be a four phase Vt cancellation scheme. However, these prior cancelation techniques have limitations of one sort or another. For example, increases in the number of stages results in increases for both the required layout area and power consumption. Further, as each subsequent transistor in the series is subjected to higher voltages, their respective voltage drops become higher and the incremental gain in each stage correspondingly diminishes. In a four phase Vt cancellation scheme, the clock skews used can be difficult to control due to mismatch and routings.
Instead, the threshold voltage can be cancelled by introducing a threshold voltage cancellation section that has the same structure as the main section of the charge pump that supplies the output. In the main section, rather than use the transistors connected as diodes, the threshold voltage cancellation stage uses the outputs from the section of the main section that it is mirroring to control the transistors. This will be illustrated using an exemplary embodiment based on a voltage doubler type of charge pump, which has been found to particular for use as an efficient low voltage output charge pump, where, in this example, the goal is to generate a target output of 4 volts from an input voltage of 2.5 volts.
More specifically, with an input voltage of Vcc=2.5 volts, to generate a 4 volt output supply able to deliver 2 mA output current, with minimum input current Icc and area requirements and good power efficiency is challenging. Normally, the sort of Dickson pump of
To prevent the charge from flowing back from the output into the pump, the nodes N1 and N2 are respectively connected to the output through transistors 421 and 423. In a typical prior art arrangement, these two transistors would be connected as diodes, having their control gates connected to also receive the voltages on N1 and N2, respectively. However, this would result in the sort of voltage drops described above. Instead, a threshold voltage cancellation section, as shown on the left side of
The Vt cancellation section has the same structure and the output section and mirrors its function. A first branch includes transistor 411 and capacitor 415 and a second branch includes transistor 413 and capacitor 417, with the control gates of the transistor in each branch cross-coupled to the output node of the other branch. The output of each branch of the threshold cancellation stage is used to drive the output transistor of the corresponding branch in the output section: the node N11 of the cancellation section is used for the control gate voltage of transistor 421 and the node N22 of the cancellation section is used for the control gate voltage of transistor 423. Since the capacitors in the cancellation section are clocked the same as the same element that they mirror in the output section, when the node N1 of the output section is high, the node N11 in the cancellation section will also be high, so that transistor 421 is on and the output voltage passed; N1 and N11 will similarly be low at the same time, so that 421 is turned off to prevent the back flow of charge. The nodes N2, N22 and transistor 423 function similarly.
Although described here for a pump design based on a voltage doubler, this sort of arrangement for the cancellation of threshold can be used charge pump types. More generally, when used with other designs, in addition to the output section, which will be formed with the same architecture as usual, there will also be a voltage threshold cancellation section formed with the same structure. In the main output section, the transistors typically connected as diodes to charge from back flowing will now have their control gates connected to be set to a voltage from the mirrored node in the voltage cancellation section. For example, going back to
It should be noted that although the output section and the cancellation section have the same structure, the various mirrored elements of the circuits need not have the same size since the elements of the output stage need to drive the load of the charge pump, whereas those of the cancellation are only driving some control gates. Returning to the exemplary embodiment, the transistors 401 and 403 and capacitors 405 and 407 need provide sufficient output for the application (e.g., 4 volts and 2 mA). In contrast, the transistors 411 and 413 and capacitors 415 and 417 need only provide sufficient output for the control gate voltage of transistors 421 and 423, For example, if the transistors in the cancellation stages need only be sized a tenth or twentieth that of the elements they mirror in the output stage.
Aspects of the preceding discussion relevant here, including multi-stage operation, are discussed further in US patent publication No. US-2011-0133820-A1 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/921,072.
Amplitude Modulation for Pass Gate to Improve Charge Pump Efficiency at Low Load Current
For DC-DC converters, such as charge pumps, power efficiency is highly dependent on the converter's AC/DC current loading profile. Pump designs are typically done to meet the highest AC/DC current load for performance when the load is charging up, which is associated with highest power efficiency. Power efficiency for low or no load loading tends to be significantly lower due to the lesser output load. Due operations, the low or no DC/AC current load usually happens much more frequently than the high load current situation. Consequently, the overall power efficiency for operation is depends heavily on low/no DC/AC current power efficiency. Because of this, improving the overall power efficiency in operations is highly dependent upon improving the power efficiency of the pump with low/no DC/AC loads. The following looks at techniques to improve the overall power efficiency of charge pump in operations with varying DC/AC current loads and making NAND memory design more power conscious in systems.
Power efficiency is always an important metric in designing a DC-DC converter, such as charge pumps. The Vt cancellation scheme described above improves the power overall efficiency. The following techniques can further improve performance, particularly when pumps operate under low DC load current. The total power for the charge pump is the output power, Pout, and the quiescent power, Pquiescent. The power efficiency is then the ration of the output power to the total power, Pout/(Pout+Pquiescent). For a fixed Pout, if Pquiescent is reduced, the efficiency will be increased. By reducing Pquiescent a given amount, the power efficiency gain for low Pout is greater than for high Pout, where power efficiency is almost independent of Pquiescent. For low Pout, an important factor in improving power efficiency is reducing Pquiescent.
When doing Vt cancellation as described above, the system normally clocks the pass gate (421 or 423 in
For example, considering the case where Vcc=2.5V, Vout=3V, and Vt=0.4V, for the full swing case the high CLKAG level is 2*Vcc=5v and the low value is 0V. In the half swing case, the high is 2*Vcc=5V and low is Vcc=2.5V. If instead the gate clocks swing between a high of 2*Vcc=5V and low of 2.5+0.4V=2.9V, the pass gates will still provide the desired function, but same on current and power. Looking at the ratios, for full swing this gives: (5−2.9)/(5−0)=0.42, or a savings of 58%. For half swing: (5−2.9)/(5−2.5)=0.82, or a saving of 18%.
The Vt offset for the pass gate's low clock value can be effect in a number of ways.
The Vt offset above Vcc can be implemented in various ways, such as with using a bias current to limit the gate voltage for a transistor 741, 743 in each leg. In the exemplary embodiment of
Although the exemplary embodiment of
Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Consequently, various adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3697860 | Baker | Oct 1972 | A |
4511811 | Gupta | Apr 1985 | A |
4583157 | Kirsch et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4621315 | Vaughn et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4636748 | Latham | Jan 1987 | A |
4736121 | Cini et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4888738 | Wong et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5140182 | Ichimura | Aug 1992 | A |
5168174 | Naso et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175706 | Edme | Dec 1992 | A |
5263000 | Van Buskirk et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5392205 | Zavaleta | Feb 1995 | A |
5436587 | Cernea | Jul 1995 | A |
5483434 | Seesink | Jan 1996 | A |
5508971 | Cernea et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521547 | Tsukada | May 1996 | A |
5539351 | Gilsdorf et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553030 | Tedrow et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563779 | Cave et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563825 | Cernea et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568424 | Cernea et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570315 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5592420 | Cernea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596532 | Cernea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602794 | Javanifard et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5621685 | Cernea et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625544 | Kowshik et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5644534 | Soejima | Jul 1997 | A |
5693570 | Cernea et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712778 | Moon | Jan 1998 | A |
5732039 | Javanifard et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734286 | Takeyama et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5767735 | Javanifard et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781473 | Javanifard et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801987 | Dinh | Sep 1998 | A |
5812017 | Golla et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818766 | Song | Oct 1998 | A |
5828596 | Takata et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5903495 | Takeuchi et al. | May 1999 | A |
5943226 | Kim | Aug 1999 | A |
5945870 | Chu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5969565 | Naganawa | Oct 1999 | A |
5969988 | Tanzawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973546 | Le et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982222 | Kyung | Nov 1999 | A |
6008690 | Takeshima et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016073 | Ghilardelli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018264 | Jin | Jan 2000 | A |
6023187 | Camacho et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026002 | Viehmann | Feb 2000 | A |
6046935 | Takeuchi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6104225 | Taguchi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107862 | Mukainakano et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134145 | Wong | Oct 2000 | A |
6151229 | Taub et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154088 | Chevallier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157242 | Fukui | Dec 2000 | A |
6188590 | Chang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198645 | Kotowski et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208198 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6249445 | Sugasawa | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249898 | Koh et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275096 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285622 | Haraguchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288601 | Tomishima | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297687 | Sugimura | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307425 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314025 | Wong | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320428 | Atsumi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320796 | Voo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320797 | Liu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6329869 | Matano | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344959 | Milazzo | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344984 | Miyazaki | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356062 | Elmhurst et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359798 | Han et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369642 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370075 | Haeberli et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385107 | Bedarida et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400202 | Fifield et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404274 | Hosono et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411157 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424570 | Le et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445243 | Myono | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456154 | Sugimura | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456170 | Segawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476666 | Palusa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486728 | Kleveland | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6518830 | Gariboldi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522191 | Cha et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525614 | Tanimoto | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525949 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531792 | Oshio | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538930 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545529 | Kim | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556465 | Wong et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6577535 | Pasternak | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6606267 | Wong | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6661682 | Kim et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6703891 | Tanaka | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724241 | Bedarida et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734718 | Pan | May 2004 | B1 |
6760262 | Haeberli et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762640 | Katsuhisa | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6781440 | Huang | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798274 | Tanimoto | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819162 | Pelliconi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834001 | Myono | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859091 | Nicholson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6878981 | Eshel | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891764 | Li | May 2005 | B2 |
6894554 | Ito | May 2005 | B2 |
6922096 | Cernea | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927441 | Pappalardo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933768 | Hausmann | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944058 | Wong | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954386 | Narui et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6975135 | Bui | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985397 | Tokui et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990031 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995603 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002381 | Chung | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7023260 | Thorp et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030683 | Pan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7092263 | Chang | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113023 | Cernea | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116154 | Guo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7116155 | Pan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120051 | Gorobets et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123078 | Seo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129538 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129759 | Fukami | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135910 | Cernea | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135911 | Imamiya | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7180794 | Matsue | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7205682 | Kuramori | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208996 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215179 | Yamazoe et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224591 | Kaishita et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227780 | Komori et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239192 | Tailliet | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253675 | Aksin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7253676 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259612 | Saether | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276960 | Peschke | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279957 | Yen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7345928 | Li | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348829 | Choy et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7368979 | Govindu et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7397677 | Collins et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7466188 | Fifield | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468628 | Im et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7495500 | Al-Shamma et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7521978 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7554311 | Pan | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7579902 | Frulio et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579903 | Oku | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7602233 | Pietri et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7667529 | Consuelo et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671572 | Chung | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7696812 | Al-Shamma et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7772914 | Jung | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795952 | Lui et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7830203 | Chang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7928796 | Namekawa | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7944277 | Sinitsky et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7956675 | Saitoh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8040174 | Likhterov | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8040184 | Tsuchiya | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8093953 | Pierdomineco et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8159091 | Yeates | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8193853 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8242834 | Chuang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8339183 | Htoo et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8395440 | Shandhu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8604868 | Ucciardello et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8643358 | Yoon | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20020008566 | Taito et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014908 | Lauterbach | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020075063 | Hwang | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075706 | Foss et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020101744 | DeMone | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130701 | Kleveland | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130704 | Myono et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140463 | Cheung | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163376 | Papplardo et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030128560 | Saiki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030214346 | Pelliconi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040046603 | Bedarida et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050024125 | McNitt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030088 | Cernea | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050093614 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050195017 | Chen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237103 | Cernea | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248386 | Pan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060114053 | Sohara et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060119393 | Hua et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060244518 | Byeon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250177 | Thorp et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070001745 | Yen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070053216 | Alenin | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069805 | Choi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070126494 | Pan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139099 | Pan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139100 | Pan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152738 | Stopel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070210853 | Maejima | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211502 | Komiya | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222498 | Choy et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070229149 | Pan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080024096 | Pan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024198 | Bitonti et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080042731 | Daga et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080068067 | Govindu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080111604 | Boerstler et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116963 | Jung | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136500 | Frulio et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157731 | Pan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080157852 | Pan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080157859 | Pan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080218134 | Kawakami | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239802 | Thorpe | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080239856 | Thorpe | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080278222 | Conti et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307342 | Furches et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090033306 | Tanzawa | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051413 | Chu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058506 | Nandi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090058507 | Nandi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091366 | Baek et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121780 | Chen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090121782 | Oyama et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090153230 | Pan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153231 | Pan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153232 | Fort et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167418 | Ragavan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174441 | Gebara et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090184697 | Park | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090219077 | Pietri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090315598 | Namekawa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315616 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322413 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100019832 | Pan | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033232 | Pan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100074034 | Cazzaniga | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085794 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118625 | Matano | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127761 | Matano | May 2010 | A1 |
20100244935 | Kim et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283549 | Wang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302877 | Bang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110026329 | Wada | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110133821 | Honda | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110156803 | Yap et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176370 | Izumi et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110254615 | Raghunathan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120230071 | Kaneda | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120274394 | Chan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130162229 | Chan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130181521 | Khlat | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140085985 | Pan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140375293 | Pan et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101764518 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101902059 | Dec 2010 | CN |
10 2007 026290 | Jul 2008 | DE |
0 382 929 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 780 515 | Jun 1997 | EP |
2007-020268 | Jan 2007 | JP |
0106336 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 2006132757 | Dec 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Feng Pan et al., “Charge Pump Circuit Design”, McGraw-Hill, 2006, 26 pages. |
Louie Pylarinos et al., “Charge Pumps: An Overview”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto, 7 pages. |
Ang et al., “An On-Chip Voltage Regulator Using Switched Decoupling Capacitors,” 2000 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,998 entitled “Charge Pump with Current Based Regulation” filed Jul. 21, 2009, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/634,385 entitled “Multi-Stage Charge Pump with Variable Number of Boosting Stages” filed Dec. 9, 2009, 33 pages. |
First Office Action issued for Chinese Patent Application No. 2011800614031 mailed on Feb. 3, 2015, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/926,442, mailed May 13, 2015, 9 pages. |
Pylarinos et al., “Charge Pumps: An Overview,” Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Proceedings of Symposium May 2003, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150091637 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |