The present invention relates generally to analog amplifiers and more particularly to offset cancellation schemes for analog amplifiers.
Differential amplifiers typically have a built-in or internal DC offset due to device mismatch and parameter variations caused by manufacturing variations, as will be understood by those in the art. This offset causes asymmetry or mismatching of the amplifier components. Of particular note, the DC offset produces mismatch in the common mode voltages of the differential outputs of the amplifier. The input-referred offset voltage of an amplifier is the differential voltage required to be applied at the input of the amplifier to produce a null output. Many applications require the cancellation/minimization of the offset voltage. For example, a limiting amplifier used in broadband optical communications often requires the offset voltage to be around 0.1 mV or less. When the offset voltage is higher, the decision circuit will slice the data at a non-optimal level which leads to a sensitivity reduction and thus a poor bit-error-rate performance. A typical single stage BJT amplifier has a 3σ random offset of a few millivolts. A RF MOS amplifier typically has an offset voltage of a few 10 millivolts. The offset is much larger for multiple stage amplifiers. Therefore, offset cancellation schemes are employed to reduce the inherent offset to the desired level.
There are two reasons why the circuit 10 does not completely eliminate the offset voltage: (i) the finite gain of the error amplifier 14 and (ii) the offset voltage VOS1 of the error amplifier. A simple analysis shows that the main amplifier 14 offset voltage is reduced to:
Since the error amplifier 14 does not have to be fast, large transistors with good matching properties can be used to make VOS1 very small. Depending on the amount of the offset that must be removed, the gain of the error amplifier 14 A1 can be a buffer (A1=1) or an amplifier (A1>1). Typically, a buffer is sufficient for a BJT amplifier while MOS amplifiers require additional loop-gain to meet the offset cancellation.
The offset-compensation circuit of
From this equation, it can be seen that in order to get a low cutoff frequency, we need to make the loop bandwidth 1/(2π×RC) much smaller. For example, if A×A1/2=100, we need a loop bandwidth of 10 kHz to achieve a cutoff frequency of 1 MHz in the main amplifier 12. As a result, the resistance and capacitance used in the RC network are usually very large, occupying excessive and often unacceptable amounts of chip area.
An amplifier having DC offset compensation is provided. The amplifier includes at least one input node and a pair of differential output nodes, a biasing circuit coupled to the input node; and a plurality of current sources. Selected ones of the current sources are coupled to the input node to adjust a DC voltage at the input node to provide DC offset compensation for the amplifier.
A system and method for calibrating the amplifier are also provided.
The above and other features of the present invention will be better understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention that is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention, as well as other information pertinent to the disclosure, in which:
The amplifier device 51 of
Amplifier device 51 also includes an offset cancellation adjustment module 58. The offset cancellation adjustment module 58 is responsive to a control signal issued from offset compensation control module 56. Offset detection module 54 detects the inherent offset within the amplifier 52. For sake of brevity,
The differential amplifier 110 includes a pair of load resistors (RLOAD) coupled between power supply node VDD and differential output nodes VON and VOP. The amplifier 110 include differential input MOS transistors M1 and M2 coupled between the output nodes and a tail current source 112 for providing tail current it. Tail current source 112 typically includes a MOS transistor operating in saturation mode. Those skilled in the art are familiar with the operation of the differential amplifier 110, which is repeated herein. The tail current it and resistance value of RLOAD are selected to set the common mode voltage of the amplifier to a desired voltage level. In one embodiment, VDD is 1.0 volt, the load resistance is 100Ω and the common mode voltage is set to 0.8V.
The offset cancellation of
Voltage adjustment circuits 116 are coupled to differential input nodes INP and INN. In one embodiment, each adjustment circuit 116 includes a current source 118 coupled to the differential input node INN or INP and a switching transistor 119 coupled between the current source 118 and a ground node. In one embodiment, current sources 118 each comprise a MOS transistor. In the illustrated embodiment, “m” number of switching adjustment circuits 116 are provided responsive to control signals C1 to Cm as described below in more detail.
In one exemplary embodiment, the current from current sources 118 are binary weighted. Assume, by way of example, that m=4, i.e., that there are four switching adjustment circuits 116. In this embodiment, three adjustment circuits 116 are coupled to node INP and one adjustment circuit is coupled to node INN. The three current sources 118 coupled to node INP are designed to provide current drops across resistor RCM of 1 mV, 2 mV and 4 mV, thereby reducing the actual DC input voltage to input node INP from the default voltage VRBIAS. The lone current source 118 coupled to node INN is designed to provide a current drop of 8 mV across resistor RCM. Assuming these design parameters, different combinations of control signals C1, C2 and C3 provide different voltages at node INP as follows:
Ideally, it is desired that the DC level of output VON equals the DC output of VOP, i.e., there is no offset, however, as explained above, there typically will be some offset due to process variations. In a first instance, assume that VON>VOP due to the offset voltage. In this situation, the input voltage at INP needs to be lowered to reduce the offset to an acceptable level, if not 0V. C1 is initially triggered to lower the voltage at INP by 1 mV. The offset is then checked and if 1 mV is not enough, then C1 can be turned off and C2 triggered to lower the voltage at INP by 2 mV. The offset is then checked again. Combinations of C1, C2 and C3 are tried until the offset is compensated.
On the other hand, assume the offset causes VON<VOP, for example by 2 mV. Since VON<VOP, C4 is turned on to lower INN by 8 mV. After C4 is triggered, INP will be 6 mV higher than the adjusted INN value. Signals C1, C2 and C3 are then selectively triggered as described above to lower INP by 6 mV until INP substantially equals INN, i.e., until any offset is within acceptable tolerances.
The following chart summarizes the voltage offset under various combinations.
Other design approaches may be utilized for adjusting the voltages at INN and INP. For example, the current values need not be binary weighted. In this embodiment, the current value from the current source coupled to INN could be selected to provide a voltage at node INN of 8 mV and eight equally valued current sources for providing a 1 mv voltage drop could be coupled to INP. Current sources could then be incrementally triggered until the offset is compensated. Likewise, multiple selectable current sources may be provided coupled to both INP and INN, or a single current selectable current source could be coupled to INP and multiple selectable current sources coupled to node INN. Further, individual current sources could be coupled to either INN or INP by a pair of switches, so that the current source could be coupled to one, both or neither node as needed.
Nonetheless, the configuration shown in
As should be understood, the increments in voltage drops across resistors RCM and the number of adjustment circuits can be readily selected to achieve a desired offset tolerance, within a given expected range of offsets. The embodiment described above, with m=4 and with the incremental voltage adjustments equal to 1 mV, can be used as long as the maximum expected offset is 8 mV and the maximum acceptable offset tolerance is 1 mV. If the maximum expected offset were 8 mV and the maximum acceptable offset tolerance were 0.5V, then m could be set to 5 and the incremental voltage adjustments set to 0.5 mV, for example. It should be apparent that the preferred binary weighted circuit design requires only one additional current source to implement these 16, as opposed to 8 (when m=4), offset compensation combinations.
For an amplifier designed in a deep submicron CMOS technology (for example a 90 nm CMOS technology), typical VDD is 1.0V. If Ibias=0.1 mA, then Rbias can be set at 2K to give a Vrbias=VDD−Ibias×Rbias=0.8V. If the maximum acceptable offset tolerance is 1 mV, then Rcm can be set at 10K, and the current source controlled by switch C1 can be set at 0.1 μA. Note that for the exemplary embodiment 0.1 μA×10K gives a maximum acceptable offset tolerance of 1 mV. The maximum acceptable offset tolerance of the amplifier is often determined by the particular applications. In optical applications where the received signal (e.g., the signal at the amplifier input nodes INN and INP) is small, a 0.1 mV or less maximum acceptable offset tolerance is often desired. On the other hand, in chip-to-chip communications where the received signal is large, a larger maximum acceptable offset tolerance (such as 1 mV) can be used.
An exemplary circuit is now described for providing control signals C1:Cm for triggering switches 119 for selectively connecting current sources 118 to nodes INN and INP, specifically for implementing offset compensation control and offset detection modules 56, 54.
As shown in the calibration system 200 of
Though the amplifier is isolated, the amplifier itself has an inherent DC offset, meaning OUTP may not be equal to OUTN. The amplifier output is sent to comparator 204 and if OUTP>OUTN, the comparator 204 outputs a logic “1” or high. Otherwise, if OUTP<OUTN, the comparator output is a logic “0” or low. If the output is “1,” then it is known that INP>INN. Conversely, if the output is “0,” then it is known then INP<INN.
It should be noted that in designing the comparator, the comparator itself should not introduce a significant amount of offset. Unlike the amplifier which often needs to operate at high frequencies, the comparator only needs to operate at a very low frequency, e.g., 3-dB bandwidth of several kHz. As a result, large transistors (e.g., the channel length of the input transistor of the comparator can be large) with good matching properties can be used to make the offset of the comparator very small/negligible. Designs for such comparators are well know in the art. In embodiments, the comparator is integrated into the amplifier integrated circuit and the comparator output is monitored by external microcontroller 208 or an on-chip microprocessor.
An exemplary procedure for calibrating the amplifier is described below. An amplifier as described herein is often used in, for example, a high-speed backplane serializer deserializer (SERDES) system, high-speed optical receiver, etc. In these applications, the entire system typically will undergo a one-time calibration. During the calibration process, the amplifier offset is calibrated out and the control signals C1:Cm are determined and set. Though not shown, signals C1:Cm for turning on/off switching devices 119 can be permanently set (e.g., connected, disconnected to an appropriate voltage for triggering device 119) by blowing switches (not shown) as will be familiar to those in the art. Alternatively, if the amplifier IC has an on-chip processor, the control signals can be programmed into a memory accessible to the processor for use during operation of the amplifier.
With reference to
The amplifier described herein can be used in any number of applications, and particularly in telecommunication and data communication systems. In one exemplary use, the amplifier is used in connection with optical detection circuitry to amplify the detected voltage from an optical fiber channel. In another exemplary embodiment, the amplifier is used as an amplifier in a DSL (digital subscriber line) system.
The signal behavior/model for the folded active inductor load is briefly discussed herein and detailed model development is provided in Jinghong Chen, et al. “Electrical Backplane Equalization Using Programmable Analog Zeros and Folded Active Inductors,” the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein (Pages: 1366-1369, 48th IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Aug. 7-10, 2005). The impedance of the folded active inductor can be calculated as:
In EQ. (1), gm denotes the small-signal trans-conductance of transistors M3 and M4, Rload denotes the resistance value of resistors RLOAD, RLOAD, and Rf denotes the resistance value of resistors R1 and R2. The impedance Zin provides a zero and a pole and has an inductor characteristic. At low frequency Zin≈Rload//1/gm; at high frequency Zin≈Rload//Rf.
The parasitic capacitances (e.g., capacitance inherent in CML logic circuits and metal routing capacitance) as well as loading capacitance (e.g., next stage load capacitance) at the output node are denoted as Cload. Then, considering Cload, the output impedance of the CML multiplexer circuit shown in
The transfer function of Zin now has one zero and two poles—zero1 and pole1 from the added folded active inductor, and pole2 due to Cload. The goal of the folded-active-inductor load is to provide the zero (e.g., zero1) in the Zin transfer function to alter the effect of the pole due to Cload (e.g., pole2 ). In the folded active inductor load shown in
A low power small area electrical backplane equalizer using programmable analog zeros and folded active inductors was implemented in a 1.0V Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) 90 nm CMOS process. With one zero stage, the equalizer occupies only 0.015 mm2 chip area and dissipates 8 mW of power. At 3.125 Gb/s data rate, lab measurement shows that the equalizer provides 6.5 dB gain boost at the baud-rate frequency. Without the use of any transmitter equalization, the analog equalizer opens the received eye which is almost closed and demonstrates error-free transmission for a PRBS-31 data pattern over a 34 inches FR4 backplane.
Referring again to
The load including folded active inductors helps to improve the switching speed of the CML circuit by offsetting parasitic capacitances in the circuit. Large voltages can be provided across the gate and source of the NMOS transistors in the folded active inductor loads without causing headroom problems associated with conventional active inductors. The common-mode voltage is also well maintained as it is not dependent upon the gate-to-source dc voltage drop across load transistors, which may vary PVTs. The entire circuit can also be operated with a 1.0V supply without the need for any high voltage generation circuit. The folded active inductor, therefore, not only consumes lower voltage headroom but also is area-efficient, compared to the conventional active and on-chip inductors, respectively.
Although the invention has been described in terms of exemplary embodiments, it is not limited thereto. Rather, the appended claims should be construed broadly to include other variants and embodiments of the invention that may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and range of equivalents of the invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/698,375 filed Jul. 12, 2005 and entitled “Electrical Backplane Equalization Using Programmable Analog Zeros And Folded Active Inductors”, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5295161 | Dreps et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5432475 | Fukahori | Jul 1995 | A |
5798664 | Nagahori et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6433612 | Jenkins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6489811 | Jenkins | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6674328 | Uto et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686787 | Ling | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6710645 | Isken et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6777988 | Tung et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6825707 | Viehmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6897700 | Fu et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6903593 | Wang | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6937083 | Manlove et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6968172 | Saito | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7154294 | Liu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7259616 | Chang | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271649 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20030141912 | Sudjian | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040100307 | Wong et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040140831 | Wang | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040227573 | Soda | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233183 | Saeki | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060077003 | Chiu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060186954 | Koller et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
07240640 | Sep 1995 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070013440 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60698375 | Jul 2005 | US |