1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to fast analog multiplexers with CMOS control signals and particularly to the elimination of cross-signal feed-through in these high speed circuits.
2. Brief Description of the Known Art
a shows the simplest type of conventional analog multiplexer 1 (MUX) built with CMOS switches. Here, the MUX switches are comprised of n-channel MOS transistors 2-4 and p-channel MOS transistors 5-7, connected in parallel to form a CMOS switch. This shows a n-to-1 MUX with input signals sig1, sig2, . . . sig n connected to MUX switches 2/5, 3/6, and 4/7, respectively. The output of the MUX switches are connected together and become the output of the MUX circuit. The MUX switches are controlled by placing complementary control voltages on the transistor gates, as shown. The logic circuit for generating these control signals is comprised of two inverters 8 and 9, as shown in
The primary problem with analog multiplexers of this type, used to select one of several input signals, is that they often have undesirable signal feed-through where an attenuated level of an unselected signal appears as part of the output signal. This feed-through is due primarily to the parasitic capacitances, Cgd and Cgs, associated with the CMOS transistors used to implement the switches. As a result, this undesirable feed-through causes a degradation at the output of both the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the signal-to-distortion ratio (SDR) for the selected signal at the output of the MUX.
Thus, there is a need for an improved high speed MUX which eliminates the cross-signal feed-through problems of the prior art. The invention and embodiment disclosed herein address this need.
For reference, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,744,995 discusses multi-input multiplexers and U.S. Pat. No. 5,598,114 discusses high-speed multiplexers.
This invention addresses the shortcomings of prior art analog multiplexers, depending on the application, to provide low-distortion, high-speed solutions. The objective is to provide high-speed multiplexers which eliminates cross-signal feed-through at the circuit's output. These designs take into account such parameters as input signal level, signal bandwidth, common mode operation, parasitic capacitance, and transistor layout.
The circuits of this invention use N-MOS/P-MOS transistor pairs for signal switches and additional N_MOS transistors to effectively shunt the unselected signal paths to circuit ground, thereby considerably reducing the amount of undesired signal presence at the circuit's output.
Two embodiments of the invention address the signal feed-through issue with CMOS circuitry; one for limited bandwidth applications and one for small signal applications. For small signal applications, the P-MOS transistors in the signal switches of these circuits are eliminated, leaving only the N-MOS transistors, to provide improved bandwidth and lower signal feed-through. All of the techniques of this invention can be applied to both single-ended and/or differential configurations.
Also, the layout of CMOS transistors with reduced parasitic capacitance, used in the implementation of the circuits of this invention, are included in the discussion.
The included drawings are as follows:
a shows a schematic for a simple analog MUX with CMOS control. (prior art)
b shows a typical schematic of the control logic for an analog MUX. (prior art)
c illustrates the switching characteristics for the n-channel and p-channel transistors commonly used in the analog MUX circuitry. (prior art)
a and 5b illustrate the layout of the CMOS transistors of this invention with reduced parasitic output capacitance for use in analog multiplexer applications.
In operation, when one signal is selected, all other signals are shunted to ground by their associated pull-down transistors, such that feed-through from the unselected signals is eliminated at the output. For example, if Sig2 is selected, then MOS pull-down transistor switch 24 is OFF, allowing the Sig2 signal to pass through to the output while MOS pull-down transistors 23 and 25 are ON, shunting any feed-through from signals Sig1 and Sign to ground and preventing any feed-through of these unselected signals at the output. Either the n-channel or p-channel MOS transistor can be selected as the ON switch, depending on the level of the input signal.
This circuit is limited to rather low bandwidth applications due to the total RC time constant associated with each switch. For example, switch SW1x 11/17 has an ON resistance of R1X and a total parasitic capacitance C1X at node N1 and switch SW1y 14/20 has an ON resistance of R1Y and a total parasitic capacitance C1Y at the output node. Therefore, the total RC time constant for Sig1 is given as:
R1X·C1X+R1Y·C1Y
For a given switch control level and common mode signal, the switch ON resistance can be reduced by increasing the widths of both the N-MOS and P-MOS transistors. However, this reduction in ON resistance is typically accompanied by an increase in the drain-to-bulk and source-to-bulk parasitic capacitance. But, an optimum design can be found for a limited number of signals that are joined together at the MUX output for a given application.
In a second embodiment of the circuit 26, for the case of small signal applications where the input signal is a small fraction of the MUX supply voltage, the switch bandwidth can be improved by modifying the circuit as shown in
The circuits discussed above are shown for single-ended signal applications. However, all these circuits can be implemented for fully differential operation, as illustrated in
The parasitic capacitance in these high-speed MUX circuits can be further reduced by using an even number of “fingers” in the circuit layout of the series output transistors SW1y 14, SW2y 15, SWny 16, as illustrated in
CS=CD=x·w
On the other hand, for the lower capacitance layout of this invention, shown in
This means that a two “finger” device has a drain-to-bulk parasitic capacitance, CdB, that is one-half the source capacitance, CS, and as a result the total output capacitance is reduced by at least 50%. This layout can be used to obtain a significant boost, where the bandwidth of the MUX circuit is at least doubled.
While the invention has been described in the context of two preferred embodiments, it will appear to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be modified in numerous ways and may assume many embodiments other than that specifically set out and described above. Accordingly, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all modifications of the invention which fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09711714 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 10983475 | Nov 2004 | US |