The present invention is directed to techniques and devices for detection of the presence and/or concentration of an analyte.
In the following discussion certain articles and methods will be described for background and introductory purposes. Nothing contained herein is to be construed as an “admission” of prior art. Applicant expressly reserves the right to demonstrate, where appropriate, that the articles and methods referenced herein do not constitute prior art under the applicable statutory provisions.
According to the American Diabetes Association, diabetes is the fifth-deadliest disease in the United States and kills more than 213,000 people a year, the total economic cost of diabetes in 2002 was estimated at over $132 billion dollars, and the risk of developing type I juvenile diabetes is higher than virtually all other chronic childhood diseases.
A critical component in managing diabetes is frequent blood glucose monitoring. Currently, a number of systems exist for self-monitoring by the patient. One such system may be termed a photometric system or method. In such systems, the first step is to obtain the sample of aqueous fluid containing an analyte to be assayed, usually whole blood or fractions thereof. The sample of blood may be obtained by a finger stick or other means.
The fluid sample is then contacted with an assay pad or membrane. Contact is generally achieved by moving the assay pad or membrane into contact with the liquid sample on the surface of the patient's skin. Following application to the pad or membrane, the target analyte present in the sample passes through the assay pad or membrane by capillary, wicking, gravity flow and/or diffusion mechanisms. Chemical reagents present in the pad or membrane react with the target analyte producing a light absorbing reaction product, or color change.
The assay pad or membrane is then inserted into a monitor where an optical measurement is then made of this color change. In those embodiments where the optical measurement is a reflectance measurement, a surface of the assay pad or membrane is illuminated with a light source. Light is reflected from the surface of the assay pad or membrane as diffuse reflected light. This diffuse light is collected and measured, for example by the detector of a reflectance spectrophotometer. The amount of reflected light is then related to the amount of analyte in the sample; usually the amount of light reflected off the surface of the assay pad or membrane is an inverse function of the amount of analyte contained in the sample.
An algorithm is employed to determine analyte concentration contained in the sample based on the information provided by the detector. Representative algorithms that may be employed where the analyte of interest is glucose and the fluid sample is whole blood are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,049,487; 5,059,394; 5,843,692 and 5,968,760; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Glucose monitoring technology that relies on the photometric method of quantifying the glucose concentration in whole blood may be subject to errors associated with variations in hematocrit level, or concentration of red blood cells within the blood sample. Various methods have been employed to ensure the accuracy and repeatability of measured glucose concentration using the photometric method across a typical range of hematocrit levels. A normal hematocrit level is 42-54% for men and 36-48% for women. Overall, the normal range is from 36-54%, but for a variety of reasons, those who regularly test their glucose concentrations may have hematocrit levels even lower (anemia) or higher (polycythemia) than these normal ranges. This presents a challenge for the development of accurate glucose monitoring. This is because the meter is typically designed or calibrated assuming the sample will contain a hematocrit level somewhere in the normal range. Diabetics and clinicians make critical medical decisions in the management of their disease based on the readings provided by these meters. Thus, it would be advantageous to have a photometric quantification method that is more accurate across a broader range of hematocrit levels.
Additionally, glucose monitors typically require that the user supply a sufficient quantity of whole blood for an accurate reading. This volume has been around 10 microliters or more in the past, but with the development of newer quantification technologies, the minimum volume has been brought to as low as 1 microliter for photometric meters. This has reduced the burden on diabetics in their testing by reducing the depth of the lancing and the effort to milk a relatively large amount of blood from their lancing site. Again, the calibration of the meter is developed with the assumption that this minimum supply has been delivered to the test strip. If the user has not supplied a sufficient amount, then the meter generally displays an error code and the user must test again. Further, a user may supply more than the typical amount of blood to the test strip, which may lead to an inaccurate result if the calibration of the strip is volume sensitive. It would be advantageous for a photometric meter to have the ability to evaluate and adjust its internal calibration by detecting the amount of fluid supplied to the reagent strip, and applying an appropriate calibration parameter specifically chosen for that volume.
The development of a fully integrated glucose meter system requires incorporating the processes of skin lancing, transfer of blood to the reagent test strip, and quantification of whole blood glucose all in a single device. Such systems may not require any user intervention at all during the quantification process as long as sufficient sample volume is obtained. An automated catalyst, such as heat, vacuum, or pressure may be utilized to obtain a sample of body fluid, or whole blood.
One such device relies on the application of a specific magnitude and duration of a partial vacuum to the skin in order to facilitate the acquisition of a minimum required sample volume. For some individuals, this pre-programmed amount or duration of vacuum may be appropriate. For others, this pre-programmed catalyst may produce either an insufficient or excessive amount of blood, as well as other undesired outcomes, such as excessive bruising (for those with fragile capillary networks), an unnecessary delay in obtaining results (for fast bleeding individuals), as well as excessive residual blood left on the skin. Thus, it would be advantageous if the sample quantification detector could also determine in real-time whether or not a sufficient sample volume has been obtained for an accurate reading, and provide this information as feedback to control the magnitude and/or duration of a catalyst. This feedback driven control would be a significant advantage for integrated glucose monitoring technology.
Photometric assay pads or membranes for analyte concentration measurements typically produce a circular or linear spot when the chemical reagents contained therein react with a fluid containing a specific analyte, such as glucose, within whole blood. An ideal spot may be defined as one in which the color across the spot is uniform and indicative of the concentration of the analyte. A spot which is not ideal may be manifest in one or more of the following ways: non-uniformity of the primary color (e.g., variations in the intensity of blue); presence of non-primary color, such as red, which may be associated with the presence and/or lysis of blood cells, and the above color variations may be distributed randomly or non-uniformly across the spot.
For a variety of reasons, the quality of a spot developed as a result of an analyte reacting with the reagent membrane may not be ideal as described above. Such reasons may include one or more of: flaws or manufacturing variations in the membrane structure; variations in the concentration of the reagent enzyme; mishandling of the membrane during manufacturing; and unintended chemical reactions between the fluid and/or analyte and the reagent structure and/or membrane chemistry (such as another medical drug within the blood sample reacting with the reagent enzyme).
Most devices on the market cannot detect or correct for low quality spots. Their sensors, typically one or more photodiodes, do not have the ability to discretely analyze the flaws within a reagent spot. Thus, there exists a risk that these systems may not provide an accurate reading in circumstances of a non-ideal spot.
According to the present invention, the state of the art has been advanced through the provision of arrangements, devices and techniques such as those described further herein, for accurately, efficiently, and economically determining the presence and/or concentration of an analyte. According to the present invention, the state of the art has been advanced, especially, but not exclusively, within the context of personal glucose monitoring devices and techniques. Additionally, or alternatively, according to the present invention arrangements, devices and techniques are provided which may overcome one or more of the abovementioned shortcomings associated with conventional systems and methods.
Devices and methods are contemplated that may employ a detector comprising an array of detector elements or pixels to detect color change or intensity of reflected light associated with a photometric chemical reaction between the analyte and reagent chemistry. Optionally, the detector elements comprise CMOS-based detector elements. In particular, the CMOS detector elements help correct for differences in hematocrit levels and/or volumes associated with samples under analysis. An additional aspect of the present invention provides for CMOS-based detector elements that can provide feedback control for a connected device that performs automated whole blood sampling and detection of an analyte. In yet another aspect of the present invention, feedback from CMOS detection elements is used to compensate for non-ideal reaction spot characteristics.
According to one aspect, the present invention provides a device for monitoring the concentration of an analyte present in bodily fluid, the device comprising a detector, the detector comprising a detector element or pixel, the element or pixel comprising a CMOS sensor, a CCD sensor, a photodiode or an infrared sensor, including both near-field and mid-field infrared sensors. Other sensing systems also contemplated within the scope of the present invention include infrared, ultraviolet and fluorescent sensing systems and electrochemical sensing systems, including reagentless sensing approaches.
It is therefore to be understood that reference herein to the detector array of the present invention may include any suitable detector element(s). The present invention is thus not limited to embodiments of the invention including CMOS or CCD detector elements, photodiodes, infrared, fluorescent, ultraviolet or electrochemical detector elements.
It is to be understood that the detector array is not limited only to linear arrays. Non-linear arrays, such as polar or area arrays, are also contemplated by the present invention.
It is to be understood that reference herein to first, second, third and fourth components (etc.) does not limit the present invention to embodiments where each of these components is physically separable from one another. For example, a single physical element of the invention may perform the features of more than one of the claimed first, second, third or fourth components. Conversely, a plurality of separate physical elements working together may perform the claimed features of one of the claimed first, second, third or fourth components. Similarly, reference to first, second (etc.) method steps does not limit the invention to only separate steps. According to the invention, a single method-step may satisfy multiple steps described herein. Conversely, a plurality of method steps could, in combination, constitute a single method step recited herein.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there are provided devices, arrangements and methods for quantifying the concentration of an analyte present in bodily fluid, comprising: an assay pad comprising at least one chemical reagent capable of producing a detectable signal in the form of a reaction spot upon reaction with the analyte; a light source; a detector; a processor; and a memory in communication with the processor, the memory comprising: (a) at least one value indicative of one or more of: (i) the level of hematocrit contained in the sample; (ii) the volume of the sample applied to the assay pad; or (iii) imperfections present in the reaction spot; and (b) at least one algorithm for calculating the concentration of the analyte contained in the sample.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, there are provided devices, arrangements and methods for quantifying the concentration of an analyte present in bodily fluid, comprising: providing an assay pad comprising at least one chemical reagent; introducing a sample onto the assay pad; producing a detectable signal in the form of a reaction spot upon reaction of the at least one chemical reagent with the analyte; generating a signal based on light reflected off the assay pad; calculating at least one value indicative to one or more of: (i) the level of hematocrit contained in the sample; (ii) the volume of the sample applied to the assay pad; or (iii) imperfections present in the reaction spot; and calculating the concentration of analyte contained in the sample by factoring in the at least one value.
According to the above, the device may comprise a glucose meter integrating some or all of the above-described features. The integrated device may be configured to perform at least one such photometric analysis before reloading disposable components thereof becomes necessary. The integrated device may be handheld or wearable. The integrated device may be in the general form of a wristwatch.
According to the present invention, the detector elements may comprise CMOS-based detector elements. Moreover, the detector array may be in the form of a linear array of CMOS-based detector elements or pixels.
According to the present invention, an integrated device may include means for extracting a sample of bodily fluid and can comprise a skin piercing member and the application of one or more of: (i) vacuum; (ii) positive pressure; and (iii) heat.
According to the present invention, as described above, the device may further comprise a computer-readable medium, the medium comprising at least one of an algorithm and a look-up table. According to the present invention, the device may further comprise a microprocessor controller.
The above-described invention may further comprise at least one of a light source, one or more lenses, one or more light transmission elements (e.g. optical fibers), optical diffusers and optical filters.
In certain embodiments of the above-described invention, the assay pad may comprise at least one chemical reagent that produces a color change defining a reaction spot upon reaction with the analyte.
The preferred embodiments are illustrated in the drawings in which like reference numerals refer to the like elements and in which:
Exemplary arrangements and methods for the detection and measurement of the presence and/or concentration of a target analyte, such as glucose, bilirubin, alcohol, controlled substances, toxins, hormones, proteins, etc., will now be described.
In broader aspects, the current invention provides the ability to correct for broad variations in sample hematocrit levels in the measurement of an analyte, such as glucose, during the course of the test. The invention takes advantage of an imaging array of detectors to perform this correction and does not require any additional hardware. In other words, no other distinct sensors or detectors, other than the imaging array, are required to calculate the correction. The very sensor that is used to quantify the analyte within the sample may also correct for hematocrit. Strategic algorithms that process the data from the imaging array provide real-time or near real-time information about the sample hematocrit level. Thus, more accurate results, regardless of the hematocrit level of the user, may be obtained via correction based on the hematocrit level of the sample.
The current invention may also use appropriate algorithms to permit real-time sensing of the amount of sample volume delivered to an assay pad. With this information, appropriate calibration parameters may be selected corresponding to the actual delivered volume. To correct for sample volume, algorithms similar to those used for hematocrit correction may be used, where volume is substituted for hematocrit and a unique formulation and corresponding constants are determined.
The present invention offers the flexibility to improve the accuracy of measured glucose for a broad range of sample volumes that are typically delivered to the assay pad of the meter system. In addition, sampling catalysts such as vacuum, heat, pressure, etc. may be implemented or provided automatically by the device to help ensure sufficient sample volume is collected and analyzed. The invention provides information to the meter system to know when and how much of the catalyst is sufficient. Since the invention can measure or estimate the volume of the sample delivered to the assay pad, it can also provide feedback to start, maintain or terminate the catalysts, as well as increase or decrease the magnitude of the catalyst, based on this measured volume. This offers the advantage of adapting the device function to the user's real-time skin physiology, minimizing the risks associated with the catalysts (bruising, scarring, excessive bleeding), reducing the energy consumed by the system, and reducing the chance of a wasted test operation (and the associated user's time, battery supply, and cost of test strip) by ensuring a minimum sample volume is obtained, as well as minimizing the overall time to get a result from the system.
According to additional broad aspects, the present invention can process data received from the detector array to compensate for irregularities or imperfections present in a reaction spot in order to improve accuracy of the analyte concentration method. The present invention includes devices, arrangements and methods that include any of the above referenced aspects individually, as well as combinations of some or all of these aspects.
The current invention may employ a linear CMOS imaging detector array. Contrary to other approaches that describe the use of 2-D CCD imaging detector arrays, the linear CMOS array detects light across a single row of optical detectors (pixels) whose output is proportional to the amount of light incident to the pixel. Linear detector arrays offer an advantage over 2-D imaging systems in simplicity and efficiency in processing the image information as long as the expected location of reagent chemistry reaction or reagent spot is known and the associated light, which may be supplied by an LED, is reflected from this area and is imaged appropriately by the CMOS array.
The CMOS detector array may have an overall size that is comparable to the size of the assay pad and the expected range of spot sizes that develop on the pad. According to one alternative, the detector can be larger than the size of the pad. This construction can allow wider tolerances in the relative position of the assay pad and the detector, and provide for additional in-process error detection and recovery (e.g., detecting or correcting for assay pad motion).
In addition to light sources such as LED's, various optical components such as lenses, diffusers, light pipes, etc. may be integrated into the system to optimize the image size and resolution. Such a system may utilize a commercially available linear CMOS detector array such as part # TSL1401R or TSL1401CS; from TAOS, Plano, Tex. This detector has 128 pixels across an array of ˜19 mm in length. Light reflected off of white surfaces, such as an unreacted reagent pad, and received by the CMOS detector results in a signal from each pixel that is conditioned to produce a near maximum response up to 5 volts. Darker surfaces, such as from a color change associated with a reagent spot, will produce lower voltage response for each pixel depending on the reagent chemistry, light source, optical path, and ultimately, the concentration of the analyte (e.g., glucose).
A number of different arrangements comprising a quantification member, such as an assay pad, a sensor or detector, and one or more additional components are contemplated by the present inventions. Additional exemplary arrangements are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/394,230, entitled ANALYTE CONCENTRATION DETECTION DEVICES AND METHODS, the entire content of which is incorporated by reference herein.
When coupled with an assay pad containing a photometric reagent, the sensor detects the change in color of the pad, and the output is processed as a change in voltage relative to that of the original reagent color. Typically, about 10-50% of the pixels across the array are sufficient to resolve a spot of color change, but this can depend on a variety of factors, including CMOS sensor design, sample volume size, reagent dynamics, and the optical path between the pad and sensor.
Since the arrangements and techniques of the present invention can perform the assay without all of the pixels in the sensor array being in optical registry with the reagent spot, it is contemplated by the present invention to utilize these free pixels in one or more possible ways. For example, a second assay may be performed at a different area of the same assay pad, or on separate assay pad, at a location corresponding to the aforementioned unused pixels. The unused pixels may be used for calibration or as a control. For instance, a control solution having a known concentration of analyte may be introduced in the area of the assay pad, or onto a separate pad, in the area of the unused pixels. The control solution reacts with the reagent and the signal produced by pixels can be calibrated in accordance with the known analyte concentration. According to another alternative, a means for calibrating the reagent for lot information may be provided in the area of the unused pixels, thereby eliminating the need for the user to set reagent lot calibration codes. A similar arrangement and technique would be to utilize a standard color in registry with the unused pixels that produces a known reflectance signal. Upon reading this known signal, the arrangement, via a microprocessor and associated software and electronic components, can verify whether or not the device is functioning properly.
According to certain embodiments, sensor data can be acquired with an analog-to-digital capture device, such as a PC board, and processed as a linear dimension data array whose size corresponds to the number of pixels in the imaging array, such as 128 or 256 pixels. This data array will change over time as the reaction between the analyte (glucose) and the reagent enzymes develops, reaches saturation and begins to dry out.
According to one embodiment, the current invention incorporates an algorithm for processing the information in the data array over time to detect and correct for the hematocrit in the blood sample. The rate of color change over time across the detector array, and thus rate of change in signal of the data array, is dependent upon the relative amount of plasma in the sample. A relatively high plasma content in a given sample size will cause the sample to react with the reagent chemistry faster and develop a change in color more quickly than a relatively smaller plasma content. Since hematocrit level is inversely proportional to plasma content, the rate of color change can be scaled inversely to hematocrit level.
The relation between rate of color change and hematocrit level will depend upon a variety of variables, including the volume of the sample delivered to the assay pad as well as the inherent reagent chemistry, optical path, light source and detector array. Consequently, a unique correlation calibration between color change rate as detected by the CMOS imager and blood hematocrit level can be empirically determined and programmed into a memory device as a lookup table, or calculation.
Exemplary, non-limiting algorithm formulations to accomplish the above include:
Pixel position x ranges from the lower to upper limits and in the case of a 256 pixel array, would range from 1 to 256. For a variety of reasons, the algorithm may be limited to the evaluation of specific positions or ranges within the array, such as between x=x_lower and x=x_upper, where x_lower may be 40 and x_upper may be 80.
Time t as referred to in these algorithms can refer to the time elapsed between known events within the analyte quantification process. For example, t=0 may be defined at the point in which blood is first presented to the reagent membrane, or when the imaging array first detects a predetermined threshold change corresponding to the arrival of the analyte to the reagent membrane.
Array signal strength A(x,t) corresponds to a measure of the color of the reagent membrane. Typically, this signal is initially processed as a voltage or a current. Those skilled in the art of photometric reagent signal process will appreciate that subsequent transformation of this data into a measure of normalized reflectance R and/or to absorption via the well-known calculation of K/S may be represented by A(x,t). For example:
K/S (x,t)=(1−R)2/2R; where R=A(x,t)Reacted/A(x,t)Unreacted, where A(x,t)Unreacted refers to the array signal corresponding to the reagent membrane prior to any reaction with the analyte, and A(x,t)Reacted the array signal corresponding to the membrane as it reacts with the analyte at array position x at time t.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that combinations of these and/or other similar algorithms would mathematically capture the relation between hematocrit and the rate of change of spot development in the membrane. Furthermore, the skilled reader would appreciate that the proportionality constants (m and C) are dependent upon the conditions of the reagent membrane (material, chemistry, lighting), the hardware and software specifications, and the nature and method in which the analyte is delivered to the membrane.
Thus, the appropriate calibration factor-relating reflected light to glucose concentration would then be chosen based on the hematocrit level. When the consumer uses the device, the meter detects color change and applies the correct calibration factor for the user's hematocrit level to the calculation of glucose content made by an algorithm also contained in the same, or a different memory device.
As an example of the above, if the glucose calibration curve is of the form:
R=m×[Glucose Concentration]+b; where R=the as-measured reflected light signal, and m and b are empirically determined constants.
A corrected signal Rc, could be derived from a look-up table of correction factors, Fh, as a function of hematocrit level:
Rc=Fh×R
This corrected signal would then be substituted into the above equation to calculate the hematocrit-adjusted glucose concentration.
Processing the data generated by the change in color caused by the reaction between the analyte and reagent chemistry in conjunction with the speed and capacity of today's microprocessors would not add to the required time to process the sample, yet would substantially increase the accuracy and reduce the variability for analyte concentration measurements associated with different whole blood hematocrit levels.
Various alternatives and modifications to the above-described embodiment related to detector data analysis to determine hematocrit levels are possible. For example, such alternatives and modifications include one or more of: evaluating the rate of pixel signal changes with respect to time; evaluating the rate of pixel change with respect to time and with respect to associated pixels that also are changing (i.e., spatial and temporal rate of change); evaluating the rate of pixel change with respect to time for an individual pixel; evaluating the rate of pixel change with respect to time for multiple pixels; evaluating the rate of pixel change with respect to time for the pixel that detects the largest change in color when enzymatic reaction and color change is complete; evaluating the rate of pixel change with respect to time for the pixel that detects the largest change in color during the ongoing enzymatic reaction; evaluating the rate of pixel change with respect to time for the pixel that detects the largest change in color after a lapse of a predetermined amount of time before any enzymatic reaction has actually occurred; and evaluating the resolved volume of the sample (as described earlier) at a specific time for which a fixed, prescribed amount of blood has been delivered to the reagent pad (since measured sample size is proportional to plasma volume, which is inversely proportional to hematocrit).
Using the aforementioned detector array, the invention also contemplates novel arrangements, devices and methods for quantifying, in real-time, the amount of sample delivered to an analyte quantification member, such as an assay pad. This method takes advantage of the discrete data provided by individual detector elements or pixels. As a reaction spot begins to develop in the assay pad, the system described earlier can resolve a particular dimension associated with the size of the spot, such as width. This invention does not require that the spot be of a particular shape, such as round, square, or rectangular, as long as the detector array is oriented to resolve at least one dimension of the spot that is proportional to sample volume. Assuming the assay pad and the method by which the blood is delivered to the pad has been optimized to reduce the variability in spot development, the spot size will be proportional to the volume of blood sample.
The imaging system can resolve the spot size by identifying how many pixels or detector elements have detected a color change. Although the color change associated with the chemical reaction between analyte and enzyme may not be completed or reached equilibrium, the quantification of the number of pixels that have detected a predetermined threshold change in color will be proportional to the spot size. Thus, a real-time assessment of the spot size and thus volume can be computed.
Accordingly, the effect on glucose concentration calculations associated with various sample volumes may be empirically determined, and a lookup table, equation, or calculation incorporated in a memory device which may then be used to select an appropriate predetermined calibration factor to provide a more accurate reading of the analyte concentration for a particular sample volume. Thus, an appropriate calibration factor based on the actual sample volume may be applied to an algorithm used to calculate glucose concentration.
As an example of the above, if the glucose calibration curve is of the form:
R=m×[Glucose Concentration]+b; where R=the as-measured reflected light signal, and m and b are empirically determined constants. A corrected signal Rc, could be derived from a look-up table of correction factors, Fv, as a function of sample volume:
Rc=Fv×R
This corrected signal would then be substituted into the above equation to calculate the volume-adjusted glucose concentration.
Various alternatives and modifications to the above-described embodiment related to detector array data analysis to determine sample size are possible, for example, such alternatives and modifications include one or more of: computing the number of pixels that have detected a change in color above a prescribed constant threshold at a particular point in time during the enzymatic reaction; computing the number of pixels that have detected a change in color above a prescribed constant threshold at multiple points in time during the enzymatic reaction; computing the number of pixels that have detected a change in color above a prescribed constant threshold at a time in which the enzymatic reaction is complete; computing the number of pixels that have detected a change in color above a variable threshold across the array; using above strategies to correlate output to actual sample volume at reagent pad; and using above strategies to predict sample volume to be delivered to assay pad after a predetermined amount of time.
Using the aforementioned detector array to detect the volume of the sample, the volume information can be used as feedback information, and utilized in devices such as an integrated meter. The definition of an integrated device or meter in this context includes one which includes the functions of acquiring a sample of body fluid or blood from the skin, transporting the body fluid or blood from the skin to a quantification area or assay pad, and quantifying the analyte (e.g.—glucose) in the sample via a photometric method.
In this embodiment, a catalyst such as vacuum, heat, pressure, vibration or similar action is preferably applied to the sampling site to facilitate the acquisition of sufficient sample volume of blood. Catalysts such as these can be effective in expressing sufficiently large volumes of blood even from alternative body sites that are less perfused than the fingertips. To ensure that the catalyst is applied with sufficient magnitude and duration, this invention provides a construction and method to control the catalyst such that it operates for exactly as long as necessary. By quantifying the sample volume delivered to the reagent pad in real-time, the detector array and associated on-board data processing within the integrated device can provide a feedback signal via a digital microprocessor controller or similar device which indicates either to increase, decrease, or keep constant the magnitude of the catalyst, as well as to either continue or stop the application of the catalyst. Those experienced in the art of controlling such catalyst mechanisms will appreciate that the control. signal may be either binary or analog and use this information accordingly to control a pump (for vacuum/pressure), a motor (for vibration), a heating element (for increasing skin temperature) or combinations thereof.
One such exemplary mode of operation is illustrated in
Various alternatives and modifications to the above-described embodiment related to detector array data analysis to provide feedback are possible. For example, such alternatives and modifications may include one or more of: providing a feedback signal corresponding to actual sample volume received at the assay pad; providing a feedback signal corresponding to predicted volume anticipated to be delivered to assay pad; providing an analog feedback signal that is proportional to the volume received at the assay pad; providing a digital feedback signal that indicates either sufficient or insufficient quantity of sample volume received; providing feedback signal based on imaging of an alternative location within the meter that is not necessarily the reagent pad, but can also be imaged by the detector array to detect whether a specific threshold of blood will be delivered to the reagent pad; and providing feedback signal based on imaging of an alternative location outside of the meter (such as on the skin) that can also be imaged by the detector array to detect whether a specific threshold of blood will be delivered to the assay pad.
The discrete nature of the detection elements or pixels also allows for detection of flaws and to distinguish them from regions of the reaction spot that are developing an appropriate or more ideal photometric reaction, even if they are randomly distributed.
For example, a detector array is arranged to scan the reaction spot, optionally coupled with appropriate optical magnification. An ideal spot will produce little or no variation in signal response across the array. In the case of a non-ideal spot, the response of the pixels will vary spatially and temporally. A quantification algorithm which has one or more of the following features could correct and/or ignore the reaction spot flaw(s) and have the potential to provide a more accurate measurement of the analyte concentration: identification and inclusion of data only from pixels which correspond to the appropriate and expected color (e.g., screen for data corresponding to various shades of blue only); identification and exclusion of data from pixels which do not correspond to the appropriate and expected color (e.g., screen out data corresponding to shades of red); inclusion/exclusion of pixel information which does not change at a rate with respect to time expected for the appropriate color (e.g., rate of change of blue is not the same as that of non-blue pixels); and inclusion/exclusion of pixel information which does not change at a rate with respect to time after a specific elapsed time or during a specific time window expected for the appropriate color (e.g., blue pixels change from time t1 to t2 by x %, whereas non-blue pixels do not change by x % between time t1 through t2).
Combinations of the above strategies or similar ones may allow the algorithm to successfully correct for non-ideal spots. It may even be the case that a relatively small percentage of the spot area actually is ideal, yet if the detector array can image this area, even 1 pixel could be sufficient to provide an accurate reading of the analyte.
The assay pad 40 preferably contains at least one reagent. A mechanism may be provided to transport a sample of body fluid, such as blood, to the assay pad 40. According to the illustrated embodiment, a hollow member 60, such as a needle, having one end in fluid communication with the assay pad may provide a mechanism for transport. As a sample of body fluid is applied to the assay pad 40, a reaction between the reagent and the analyte of interest (e.g., glucose) results in a color change on a surface of the assay pad 40 forming a reaction spot 50 in optical registry with the array of detector elements 30. The detector array 20 corresponds in location to the spot 50 produces a signal in response to the color change that is indicative of the presence of the analyte of interest. The signal can be used to estimate the volume of the sample applied to the reagent pad, monitor the kinetics of the reaction between the reagent and the analyte, and ascertain irregularities in the reaction spot 50, as described above. This information can then be used to correct the output (e.g., concentration of analyte present in the sample) of the device to account for the hematocrit level, volume of sample presented to the assay pad 40, and/or irregularities in the reaction spot 50. The above-described arrangement 10 of features may all be contained or integrated within a single device or meter. Alternatively, one or a combination of any of the above-described features may be incorporated into such a device.
The detector array 20 forms part of an arrangement 70 present in the device 10 for carrying out the various operations described herein. As best illustrated in
As illustrated, the detector may comprise an internal signal amplifier 74. Alternatively, the signal amplifier 74 may be external, as indicated by the amplifier 74 shown in broken line. According to another alternative, the amplifier 74 may be entirely omitted. According to yet another alternative, both an internal and external amplifiers 74 may be provided.
The signal from the detector 20 is outputted to an analog/digital converter 76 (where no digital data interface is provided by the detector). The converter 76 is connected to a bus 78, along with a memory 80 and an input/output device 82. The memory 80 may comprise one or more of RAM, ROM or EEPROM, as well as other conventional memory devices. Whatever its form, the memory 80 preferably contains at least one value indicative of hematocrit level, sample volume or reagent spot imperfections. In this regard the memory may contain one or more of the algorithms and look-up tables described herein.
The converter 76, the bus 78, the memory 80 and input/output device 82 may be components of a microprocessor/microcontroller 84. According to an alternative embodiment, the converter 76, memory 80 and input/output device 82 are external to the microprocessor/microcontroller 84.
The input/output device 82 is in signal communication with various output devices 86, 88, 90, 92, and can provide control signals thereto. These output devices may include a device providing a catalyst to facilitate sample acquisition, as described herein. For example, these devices may include one or more of a vacuum pump, an actuation trigger device, a light source, a heat source, a vibration motor, or combinations of any of the foregoing. Regardless of the form of these devices, they are configured and arranged such that they are in signal communication with input/output device 82 so as to be responsive to the control signals. These control signals may be based on sample volume calculations made with the assistance of the detector array, as described herein.
An integrated device formed according to the principles of the present invention may have a number of suitable configurations. According to certain embodiments the device is configured to perform testing by acquiring a sample of blood from the user, transfer the sample to an analysis site, and determine the concentration of a target analyte contained in the sample. These operations are all performed with little or no user input. For example, these operations may commence automatically according to a specified or predetermined schedule. Alternatively, these operations may commence at the command of the user via, for example, pressing a start button on the device.
The device may include disposable and reusable portions. The disposable portion may include at least one skin piercing element/transport member and analysis site (which may include an assay pad). The disposable portion may provide the capability to perform a single test. After testing is complete, the disposable portion is discarded and replaced with a new disposable portion before performing another test. Alternatively, the disposable portion includes a plurality of skin piercing elements/transport members and analysis sites. Such disposable units permit a plurality of tests to be performed before it is necessary to discard and replace the disposable unit. The device may be either wearable or handheld, or both.
A non-limiting exemplary integrated device 100 is illustrated in
The device 100 preferably includes at least one arrangement for performing a measurement of the concentration of an analyte contained in a sample of blood. According to the illustrated embodiment, the device 100 comprises at least one skin-piercing element, at least one actuation member, such as a torsional spring element as described in further detail herein, and at least one analysis site 110, which may contain an assay pad. The at least one arrangement may form part of a disposable portion or unit. According to one embodiment, the disposable unit allows for at least one measurement of the concentration of an analyte contained in a sample of blood prior to being discarded and replaced. According to a further embodiment, the disposable unit allows for a plurality of measurements of the concentration of an analyte contained in a sample of blood prior to being discarded and replaced.
According to certain alternative embodiments, the device may additionally contain one or more of the features disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,540,975, U.S. Patent Application Publications 2003/0153900, 2004/0191119, and published PCT Applications WO 04/085995 and WO 04/0191693, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
While this invention is satisfied by embodiments in many different forms, as described in detail in connection with preferred embodiments of the invention, it is understood that the present disclosure is to be considered as exemplary of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments illustrated and described herein. Numerous variations may be made by persons skilled in the art without departure from the spirit of the invention. The abstract and the title are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention, as their purpose is to enable the appropriate authorities, as well as the general public, to quickly determine the general nature of the invention. Unless the term “means” is expressly used, none of the features or elements recited herein should be construed as means-plus-function limitations pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/614,177, filed Feb. 4, 2015, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,366,636 on Jun. 14, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/037,089, filed Feb. 28, 2011, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,969,097 on Mar. 3, 2015, and which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/239,122, filed Sep. 30, 2005, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Patent Application No. 60/689,546 filed Jun. 13, 2005, the entire content of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
842690 | Oswalt | Jan 1907 | A |
D137874 | Partridge | May 1944 | S |
2749797 | Harks | Mar 1950 | A |
3092465 | Adams, Jr. | Jun 1963 | A |
3310002 | Wilburn | Mar 1967 | A |
3620209 | Kravitz | Nov 1971 | A |
3623475 | Sanz et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3626929 | Sanz et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3630957 | Rey | Dec 1971 | A |
D223165 | Komendat | Mar 1972 | S |
3723064 | Liotta | Mar 1973 | A |
3741197 | Sanz et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3961898 | Neeley et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4014328 | Cluff et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4042335 | Clement | Aug 1977 | A |
4057394 | Genshaw | Nov 1977 | A |
4109655 | Chacomac | Aug 1978 | A |
4250257 | Lee et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4254083 | Columbus | Mar 1981 | A |
4258001 | Pierce et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4260257 | Neeley et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4289459 | Neeley et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4321397 | Nix et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4350762 | DeLuca et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4394512 | Batz | Jul 1983 | A |
4414975 | Ryder et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4416279 | Lindner et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4418037 | Katsuyama et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4422941 | Vaughan, Jr. et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4429700 | Thees et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4627445 | Garcia et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637403 | Garcia et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4637406 | Guinn et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4653513 | Dombrowski | Mar 1987 | A |
4661319 | Lape | Apr 1987 | A |
4702261 | Cornell et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4711250 | Gilbaugh, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4737458 | Batz et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4767415 | Duffy | Aug 1988 | A |
4774192 | Terminiello et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4790979 | Terminiello et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794926 | Munsch et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4815843 | Tiefenthaler et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4829470 | Wang | May 1989 | A |
4846785 | Cassou et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4887306 | Hwang et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4920977 | Haynes | May 1990 | A |
4929426 | Bodai et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930525 | Palestrant | Jun 1990 | A |
4935346 | Phillips | Jun 1990 | A |
4953552 | De Marzo | Sep 1990 | A |
4966646 | Zdeblick | Oct 1990 | A |
4995402 | Smith | Feb 1991 | A |
5029583 | Meserol | Jul 1991 | A |
5049487 | Phillips et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5050617 | Columbus et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5059394 | Phillips et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5077199 | Basagni et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5094943 | Siedel et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5110724 | Hewett | May 1992 | A |
5114350 | Hewett | May 1992 | A |
5116759 | Klainer et al. | May 1992 | A |
5131404 | Neeley et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5141868 | Shanks et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145565 | Kater et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5146437 | Boucheron | Sep 1992 | A |
5153416 | Neeley | Oct 1992 | A |
5164575 | Neeley et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166498 | Neeley | Nov 1992 | A |
5174291 | Schoonen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176632 | Bernardi | Jan 1993 | A |
5179005 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5183741 | Arai et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5196302 | Kidwell | Mar 1993 | A |
5208163 | Charlton et al. | May 1993 | A |
5213966 | Vuorinen et al. | May 1993 | A |
5217480 | Habar et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5218966 | Yamasawa | Jun 1993 | A |
5223219 | Subramanian et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228972 | Osaka et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234818 | Zimmermann et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241969 | Carson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251126 | Kahn et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
D341848 | Bigelow et al. | Nov 1993 | S |
5275159 | Griebel | Jan 1994 | A |
5278079 | Gubinski et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5288646 | Lundsgaard et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5299571 | Mastrototaro | Apr 1994 | A |
5301686 | Newman | Apr 1994 | A |
5302513 | Mike et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304468 | Phillips et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306623 | Kiser et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308767 | Terashima | May 1994 | A |
5320607 | Ishibashi | Jun 1994 | A |
5354537 | Moreno | Oct 1994 | A |
5360595 | Bell et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368047 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383512 | Jarvis | Jan 1995 | A |
5390671 | Lord et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399316 | Yamada | Mar 1995 | A |
5401110 | Neeley | Mar 1995 | A |
5402798 | Swierczek et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5426032 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5441513 | Roth | Aug 1995 | A |
5451350 | Macho et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458140 | Eppstein et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5460777 | Kitajima et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5460968 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5482473 | Lord et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506200 | Hirschkoff et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507288 | Böcker et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508200 | Tiffany et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510266 | Bonner et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514152 | Smith | May 1996 | A |
5527892 | Borsotti et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5563042 | Phillips et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568806 | Cheney, II et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569287 | Tezuka et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575403 | Charlton et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577499 | Teves | Nov 1996 | A |
5582184 | Erickson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586553 | Halili et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591139 | Lin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611809 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624458 | Lipscher | Apr 1997 | A |
5630986 | Charlton et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632410 | Moulton et al. | May 1997 | A |
5636632 | Bommannan et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647851 | Pokras | Jul 1997 | A |
5658515 | Lee et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660791 | Brenneman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670031 | Hintsche et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676850 | Reed et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680858 | Hansen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681484 | Zanzucchi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682233 | Brinda | Oct 1997 | A |
5697901 | Eriksson | Dec 1997 | A |
5701181 | Boiarski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701910 | Powles et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705018 | Hartley | Jan 1998 | A |
5708247 | McAleer | Jan 1998 | A |
5708787 | Nakano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715417 | Gardien et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730753 | Morita | Mar 1998 | A |
5735273 | Kurnik et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5736103 | Pugh | Apr 1998 | A |
5741211 | Renirie et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746217 | Erickson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746720 | Stouder, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5757666 | Schreiber et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759364 | Charlton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766066 | Ranniger | Jun 1998 | A |
5771890 | Tamada | Jun 1998 | A |
5797693 | Jaeger | Aug 1998 | A |
5801057 | Smart et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807375 | Gross et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820570 | Erickson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827183 | Kumik et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5840020 | Heinonen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841126 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843692 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5846837 | Thym et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854074 | Charlton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
D403975 | Douglas et al. | Jan 1999 | S |
5855801 | Lin et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5856195 | Charlton et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858194 | Bell | Jan 1999 | A |
5866281 | Guckel et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871494 | Simons et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879310 | Sopp et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879326 | Godshall et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879367 | Latterell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885839 | Lingane et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891053 | Sesekura | Apr 1999 | A |
5893870 | Talen et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911711 | Pelkey | Jun 1999 | A |
5911737 | Lee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912139 | Iwata et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925021 | Castellano et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928207 | Pisano et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930873 | Wyser | Aug 1999 | A |
5938679 | Freeman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945678 | Yanagisawa | Aug 1999 | A |
5951492 | Douglas et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951493 | Douglas et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954685 | Tierney | Sep 1999 | A |
5962215 | Douglas et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968760 | Phillips et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968765 | Grage et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971941 | Simons et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972294 | Smith et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986754 | Harding | Nov 1999 | A |
5989409 | Kurnik et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993189 | Mueller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001067 | Shults et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005545 | Nishida et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010463 | Lauks et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6010519 | Mawhirt et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014135 | Fernandes | Jan 2000 | A |
6014577 | Henning et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023629 | Tamada | Feb 2000 | A |
6027459 | Shain et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030827 | Davis et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032059 | Henning et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036924 | Simons et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041253 | Kost et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050988 | Zuck | Apr 2000 | A |
6056701 | Duchon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6056734 | Jacobsen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058321 | Swayze et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059815 | Lee et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061128 | Zweig et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063039 | Cunningham et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071294 | Simons et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077660 | Wong et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080116 | Erickson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083196 | Trautman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086544 | Hibner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090790 | Eriksson | Jul 2000 | A |
6091975 | Daddona et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093156 | Cunningham et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097831 | Wieck et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099484 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100107 | Lei et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102933 | Lee et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103033 | Say et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103197 | Werner | Aug 2000 | A |
6106751 | Talbot et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118126 | Zanzucchi | Sep 2000 | A |
6120676 | Heller et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123861 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126899 | Woudenberg et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132449 | Lum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139562 | Mauze et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142939 | Eppstein et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152942 | Brenneman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162639 | Douglas | Dec 2000 | A |
6175752 | Say et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176865 | Mauze et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183434 | Eppstein et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6183489 | Douglas et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187210 | Lebouiz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192891 | Gravel et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200296 | Dibiasi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206841 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214626 | Meller et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219574 | Cormier et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228100 | Schraga | May 2001 | B1 |
6230051 | Cormier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231531 | Lum et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241862 | McAleer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242207 | Douglas et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245215 | Douglas et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251083 | Yum et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251260 | Heller et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254586 | Mann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6255061 | Mori et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256533 | Yuzhakov et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268162 | Phillips et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271045 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272364 | Kurnik | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283926 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289230 | Chaiken et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298254 | Tamada | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6299578 | Kurnik et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309351 | Kurnik et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D450711 | Istvan et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
6312612 | Sherman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312888 | Wong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322808 | Trautman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6329161 | Heller et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331266 | Powell et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332871 | Douglas et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334856 | Allen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350273 | Minagawa et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352514 | Douglas et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356776 | Berner et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358265 | Thorne, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364890 | Lum et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375626 | Allen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375627 | Mauze et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379969 | Mauze et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391005 | Lum et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391645 | Huang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409679 | Pyo | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6428664 | BhulLar et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449608 | Morita et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455324 | Douglas | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6493069 | Nagashimada et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500134 | Cassone | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6520973 | McGarry | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530892 | Kelly | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537243 | Henning et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540675 | Aceti et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544475 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555061 | Leong et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558624 | Lemmon et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579690 | Bonnecaze et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602205 | Erickson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612111 | Hodges et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616616 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626874 | Duchamp | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656167 | Numao et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679852 | Schmelzeisen-Redeker et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6706000 | Perez et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706049 | Moerman | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706159 | Moerman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707554 | Miltner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6740800 | Cunningham | May 2004 | B1 |
6748275 | Lattner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753187 | Cizdziel et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766817 | da Silva | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6793633 | Douglas et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6830669 | Miyazaki et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836678 | Tu | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837858 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847451 | Pugh | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6918404 | Da Silva | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919960 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923764 | Aceti et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936476 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6988996 | Roe et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004928 | Aceti et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011630 | Desai et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025774 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7052652 | Zanzucchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066586 | Da Silva | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066890 | Lam et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7141058 | Briggs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7156809 | Quy | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7192061 | Martin | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D540343 | Cummins | Apr 2007 | S |
7223365 | Von Der Goltz | May 2007 | B2 |
7225008 | Ward et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7226461 | Boecker et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
D551243 | Young | Sep 2007 | S |
7270970 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7297151 | Boecker et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7343188 | Sohrab | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344507 | Briggs et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7379167 | Mawhirt et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7427377 | Zanzucchi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
D599373 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D601257 | Berlinger et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
7585278 | Aceti et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
D601444 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
D601578 | Poulet et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
7682318 | Alden et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
D622393 | Gatrall et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7803123 | Perez et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7850521 | Briggs et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7887494 | Emery et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
D642191 | Barnett et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
8012103 | Escutia et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8012104 | Escutia et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
D654926 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
8184273 | Dosmann et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8231832 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8303518 | Aceti et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8360993 | Escutia et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8360994 | Escutia et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8372015 | Escutia et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8382681 | Escutia et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
D691174 | Lipman et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
8795201 | Escutia et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8801631 | Escutia et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8919605 | Lipman et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8969097 | Emery et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9366636 | Emery et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9603562 | Aceti et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9636051 | Emery et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
20010001034 | Douglas | May 2001 | A1 |
20010027328 | Lum et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010053891 | Ackley | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002326 | Causey, III et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002344 | Douglas et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004640 | Conn et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006355 | Whitson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016568 | Lebel et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020688 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022934 | Vogel et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023852 | Mcivor et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042594 | Lum et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052618 | Haar et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087056 | Aceti et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020136667 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137998 | Smart et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160520 | Orloff et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168290 | Yuzhakov et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169394 | Eppstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169411 | Sherman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177761 | Orloff et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183102 | Withers et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188223 | Perez et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198444 | Uchigaki et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012693 | Otillar et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028087 | Yuzhakov et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028125 | Yuzhakov et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039587 | Niermann | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030083685 | Freeman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083686 | Freeman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030116596 | Terasawa | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135166 | Gonnelli | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135333 | Aceti | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153844 | Smith et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153900 | Aceti et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030175987 | Verdonk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206302 | Pugh | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207441 | Eyster et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208113 | Mault et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030211619 | Olson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212344 | Yuzhakov et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212347 | Sohrab | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040010207 | Flaherty et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030353 | Schmelzeisen-redeker et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049219 | Briggs et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059256 | Perez | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073140 | Douglas | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040092842 | Boecker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092995 | Boecker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096959 | Stiene et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098009 | Boecker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102803 | Boecker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122339 | Roe et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040132167 | Rule et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138588 | Saikley et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155084 | Brown | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178218 | Schomakers et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186394 | Roe et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191119 | Zanzucchi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202576 | Aceti et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236251 | Roe et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238675 | Banaszkiewicz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259180 | Burke et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010134 | Douglas et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015020 | LeVaughn et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050070819 | Poux et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096686 | Allen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106713 | Phan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050159678 | Taniike et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187532 | Thurau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202567 | Zanzucchi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202733 | Yoshimura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215872 | Berner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215923 | Wiegel | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245844 | Mace et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255001 | Padmaabhan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277972 | Wong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008389 | Sacherer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036134 | Tarassenko et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079809 | Goldberger | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060117616 | Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122536 | Haar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135873 | Karo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155317 | List | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178600 | Kennedy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189908 | Kennedy | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204399 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229533 | Hoenes et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241517 | Fowler et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257993 | Mcdevitt et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259102 | Slatkine | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281187 | Emery et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070017824 | Rippeth et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078313 | Emery et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078358 | Escutia et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083131 | Escutia et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070179404 | Escutia et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255181 | Alvarez-icaza et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255302 | Koeppel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080046831 | Imai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077048 | Escutia et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080194934 | Ray et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090156923 | Power et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090292489 | Burke et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090301899 | Hodges et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010374 | Escutia et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021947 | Emery et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021948 | Lipman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100095229 | Dixon et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100174211 | Frey et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185120 | Sacherer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217155 | Poux et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110098599 | Emery et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110201909 | Emery et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120166090 | Lipman et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120296179 | Zanzucchi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130158430 | Aceti et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158432 | Escutia et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172698 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130274568 | Escutia et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140316301 | Escutia et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140336480 | Escutia et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140376762 | Lipman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150037898 | Baldus et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 513 465 | Aug 2004 | CA |
199 22 413 | Nov 2000 | DE |
103 02-501 | Aug 2004 | DE |
0103426 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0 256 806 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0 396-016 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0 396-016 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0 255-338 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1 266-607 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 266-607 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 360-934 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 360-934 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 486-766 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 486-766 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 529-489 | May 2005 | EP |
1 529-489 | May 2005 | EP |
1 769-735 | Apr 2007 | EP |
63-305841 | Dec 1988 | JP |
3-63570 | Mar 1991 | JP |
03093189 | Apr 1991 | JP |
7-67861 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7-213925 | Aug 1995 | JP |
9-168530 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9-313465 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9-266889 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9-294737 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10-024028 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-318970 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2000-116629 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-126161 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-168754 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-254111 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-159618 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-515203 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-305096 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001-330581 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-502045 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-514453 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-168862 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003-180417 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-000598 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-500948 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-117339 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-522500 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-528936 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-503538 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-087613 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006-512969 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-525149 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-237938 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-525846 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-527254 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-512974 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-516723 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006-521555 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006-527013 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007-067698 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-521031 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-311196 | Nov 2007 | JP |
WO-8807666 | Oct 1988 | WO |
WO-9114212 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO-9413203 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO-9510223 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO-9510223 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO-9604857 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO-9607907 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO-9614026 | May 1996 | WO |
WO-9625088 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO-9715227 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9729847 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9730344 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9741421 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-9831275 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9835225 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO-9912008 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-9944508 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-9958051 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO-0009184 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0013573 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0014269 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0014535 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0018449 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0018449 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0019185 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0036400 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0042422 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0074763 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0074763 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0078208 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0116575 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0152727 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0164105 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0164105 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0172220 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0180728 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0185233 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0185233 | Nov 2001 | WO |
W0-0191634 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-0191634 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-0200101 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0200101 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0249507 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-0249509 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-0249509 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-02082052 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02082052 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02093144 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02100251 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-02100251 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-02101359 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-02101359 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-2003030984 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-2003066128 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-2003066128 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-2003070099 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-2003071940 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2003071940 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2004062499 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004062500 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004062500 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004064636 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2004085995 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004085995 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004091693 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004091693 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2005006939 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005006939 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005009238 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005018709 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005018709 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005084546 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2005084546 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2005085995 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2006138226 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2006138226 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2007041062 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041062 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041063 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041063 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041244 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041244 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041287 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041287 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041355 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007041355 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2008027319 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2008027319 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2009145920 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2009148624 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2009148626 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2011065981 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO-2011162823 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2013020103 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2014205412 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ADA Consensus Development Panel. (Jan.-Feb. 1987). “Consensus Statement on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose,” Diabetes Care 10(1):95-99. |
ADA (Jan. 1994). “Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose,” Consensus Statement Diabetes Care 17(1):81-86. |
Anonymous. (Sep. 30, 1993). “The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus.” The New England Journal of Medicine 329(14):977-986. |
Anonymous. (Jun. 23, 1998). Taking the “Ouch” Out of Needles: Arrays of “Microneedles” Offer New Techniques for Drug Delivery, Science Daily, located at <http:www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/06/980623045850.htm>, last visited Jan. 14, 2014, 3 pages. |
Beregszàszi, M. et al. (Jul. 1997). “Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Children and Adolescents with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus: Prevalence and Risk Factors,” J. Pediatrics 131(1 Pt. 1):27-33. |
Chase, H.P. et al. (Feb. 2001). “Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Monitoring in Children with Type 1 Diabetes,” Pediatrics 107(2):222-226. |
Clarke, W.L. et al. (Sep.-Oct. 1987). “Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose,” Diabetes Care 10(5):622-628. |
Clarke, W.L. et al. (1981). “Evaluation of a New Reflectance Photometer for Use in Home Blood Glucose Monitoring,” Diabetes Care 4(5):547-550. |
Collison, M.E. et al. (Sep. 1999). “Analytical Characterization of Electrochemical Biosensor Test Strips for Measurement of Glucose in Low-Volume Interstitial Fluid Samples,”Clinical Chemistry 45(9): 1665-1673. |
Cox, D.J. et al. (Jun. 1997). “Understanding Error Grid Analysis,” Diabetes Care 20(6):911-912. |
D'Arrigo, T.D. (Mar. 2000). “GlucoWatch Monitor Poised for Approval,” Diabetes Forecast, 53(3):43-44. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 18, 2013, for EP Application No. 06 772 943.4, filed on Jun. 13, 2006, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 27, 2012, for European Patent Application No. 09 758 789.3, filed on Jun. 8, 2009, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/239,122, filed on Sep. 30, 2005, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,089, filed on Feb. 28, 2011, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,089, filed on Feb. 28, 2011, 14 pages. |
Feldman, B. et al. (2000). “FreeStyle™: A Small-Volume Electrochemical Glucose Sensor for Home Blood Glucose Testing,” Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics, 2(2):221-229. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 16, 2008, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/022840, filed on Jun. 13, 2006, 1 page. |
Johnson, R.N. et al. (Jan. 1998). “Accuracy of Devices Used for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 35(1):68-74. |
Johnson, R.N. et al. (Jan. 1999). “Analytical Error of Home Glucose Monitors: A Comparison of 18 Systems,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 36(1):72-79. |
Johnson, R.N. et al. (2001). “Error Detection and Measurement in Glucose Monitors,” Clinica Chimica Acta 307:61-67. |
Kumetrix, Inc. (Dec. 1999). “Painless Blood Glucose Monitoring, Courtesy of the Mosquito,” Start-Up pp. 27-28. |
Lee, S-C. (Jun. 1999). “Light Scattering by Closely Spaced Parallel Cylinders Embedded in a Finite Dielectric Slab,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A 16(6):1350-1361. |
McGarraugh, G. et al. (2001). “Physiological Influences on Off-Finger Glucose Testing,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 3(3):367-376. |
McNichols, R.J. et al. (Jan. 2000). “Optical Glucose Sensing in Biological Fluids: An Overview,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, 5(1):5-16. |
Mahler, R.J. et al. (1999). “Clinical Review 102, Type 2 Diabetes Melitus: Update on Diagnosis Pathophysiology, and Treatment,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 84(4): 1165-1171. |
Medline Plus. (Jun. 17, 2008). , Medical Encyclopedia, Monitor Blood Glucose-Series: Part 1-4, 6 pages. |
Neeley, W.E. et al. (1981). “An Instrument for Digital Matrix Photometry,” Clinical Chemistry 27(10):1665-1668. |
Neeley, W.E. (1983). “Reflectance Digital Matrix Photometry,” Clinical Chemistry 29(6):1038-1041. |
Neeley, W.E. (1983). “Multilayer Film Analysis for Glucose in 1- μL Samples of Plasma,” Clinical Chemistry 29(12):2103-2105. |
Neeley, W.E. (1988). “A Reflectance Photometer with a Square Photodiode Array Detector for Use on Multilayer Dry-Film Slides,” Clinical Chemistry 34(11):2367-2370. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/239,122, filed Sep. 30, 2005, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/239,122, filed Sep. 30, 2005, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,089, filed Feb. 28, 2011, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,089, filed Feb. 28, 2011, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,089, filed Feb. 28, 2011, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 29, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,177, filed Feb. 4, 2015, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 18, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,089, filed Feb. 28, 2011, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 16, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,177, filed Feb. 4, 2015, 7 pages. |
Otto, E. et al. (2000). “An Intelligent Diabetes Software Prototype: Predicting Blood Glucose Levels and Recommending Regimen Changes,” Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2(4):569-576. |
Pfohl, M. et al. (2000). “Spot Glucose Measurement in Epidermal Interstitial Fluid—An Alternative to Capillary Blood Glucose Estimation,” Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes 108(1):1-4. |
Princen, H.M. (May 1969). “Capillary Phenomena in Assemblies of Parallel Cylinders, I. Capillary Rise Between Two Cylinders,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 30(1):69-75. |
Princen, H.M. (Jul. 1969). “Capillary Phenomena in Assemblies of Parallel Cylinders, II. Capillary Rise in Systems with More Than Two Cylinders,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 30(3):359-371. |
Rebrin, K. et al. (Sep. 1999). “Subcutaneous Glucose Predicts Plasma Glucose Independent of Insulin: Implications for Continuous Monitoring,” American Journal of Physiology 277(3):E561-E571. |
Smart, W.H. et al. (2000). “The Use of Silicon Microfabrication Technology in Painless Glucose Monitoring,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 2(4):549-559. |
Svedman, C. et al. (Apr. 1999). “Skin Mini-Erosion Technique for Monitoring Metabolites in Interstitial Fluid: Its Feasibility Demonstrated by OGTT Results in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Subjects,” Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 59(2):115-123. |
Tietz, N.W. (1986).Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, W. B. Saunders Company, pp. 1533 and 1556. |
Trinder, P. (1969). “Determination of Glucose in Blood Using Glucose Oxidase with an Alternate Oxygen Acceptor,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 6:24-28. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 16, 2008, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/022840, filed on Jun. 13, 2006, 3 pages. |
Yum, S. I. et al. (Nov. 1, 1999). “Capillary Blood Sampling for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 1(1):29-37. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/566,886, filed Aug. 3, 2012, 18 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2016 by the European Patent Office for Application No. 16167087.2, filed Aug. 3, 2012, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170095188 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60689546 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14614177 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15177041 | US | |
Parent | 13037089 | Feb 2011 | US |
Child | 14614177 | US | |
Parent | 11239122 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 13037089 | US |