Introduction and management of insulin therapy to a patient with diabetes can be overwhelming to the patient and a burden to the provider due to the complexity of conventional methods and devices for doing so. Significant training of the patient may be necessary. The patient may need to learn, for example, various concepts and actions including hypoglycemia management, injections and the proper use of insulin administration devices, as well as the mechanical, electronic, and software aspects of using a blood glucose meter. In addition, the patient must learn to follow the doctor's instructions in starting and adjusting insulin dosages on a regular basis (e.g., per meal, daily, 2× weekly, or weekly basis).
Detailed instructions as to the prescribed blood glucose testing and insulin titration protocol are typically written out by the health care professional and checked off on a piece of paper. Patients often keep handwritten logs in order to comply. It is not uncommon for a patient to have poor glycemic control even after getting onto insulin therapy. The user can have difficulty determining how much insulin to take before going to bed based on current and previous glucose measurements.
Applicants have recognized that there is a need for safeguards in self-administered insulin therapy. In providing a solution that is believed to satisfy this need, applicants have provided for a method for management of diabetes of a user with a handheld glucose-insulin data management unit. The data management unit has an analyte test sensor, a processor coupled to a memory and display. The method can be achieved by: measuring a plurality of blood glucose concentration value of the user with the analyte test sensor over a plurality of time periods; collecting data representative of the plurality of fasting blood glucose concentration value with the handheld glucose-insulin data management unit; ascertaining from the collected data whether the user has conducted a minimum number fasting blood glucose concentration measurements within at least one of four prescribed time periods; determining whether the collected data indicate one of a first low blood glucose concentration pattern and a second low blood glucose concentration pattern lower than the first low blood glucose concentration pattern; and upon determination of at least one of the first and second low blood glucose concentration patterns of the user, displaying safety notifications on the display screen of the handheld glucose-insulin data management unit.
In a further embodiment, a method to safeguard basal insulin dose changes with a handheld glucose-insulin data management unit is provided. The data management unit has a test sensor, a processor coupled to a memory and display. The method can be achieved by: collecting data representative of a plurality of fasting blood glucose concentration values as measured by the test sensor of the handheld glucose-insulin data management unit; performing safeguards against hypoglycemia of the user prior to any change in basal insulin dosage based on the plurality of data; and upon completion of the safeguard, recommending one of no change in the current basal insulin dose, an increase or decrease in the current basal insulin dose as a function of at least three consecutive fasting glucose concentration values from the plurality of fasting blood glucose concentration values.
These and other embodiments, features and advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art when taken with reference to the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that are first briefly described here below.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain features of the invention.
The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings, in which like elements in different drawings are identically numbered. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict selected exemplary embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The detailed description illustrates by way of example, not by way of limitation, the principles of the invention. This description will clearly enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and describes several embodiments, adaptations, variations, alternatives and uses of the invention, including what is presently believed to be the best mode of carrying out the invention.
As used herein, the terms “about” or “approximately” for any numerical values or ranges indicate a suitable dimensional tolerance that allows the part or collection of components to function for its intended purpose as described herein. In addition, as used herein, the terms “patient,” “host,” “user,” and “subject” refer to any human or animal subject and are not intended to limit the systems or methods to human use, although use of the subject invention in a human patient represents a preferred embodiment.
Embodiments described and illustrated herein provide an analyte (e.g., blood glucose) measurement and management device and associated methods that simplify training and guide a patient regarding how to adjust basal insulin therapy. Such methods also notify a user when there is a potential problem and when to contact a doctor. Embodiments of the analyte measurement and management device and system are also beneficial to care providers (for example, physicians) by gathering, organizing and storing information that provides insight into how effective a patient is in following a prescribed analyte management regimen.
In one embodiment, a health care provider (“HCP”) may prescribe that a patient take a basal insulin dose on a recurring basis (e.g., before bedtime every day). Basal insulin can refer to background insulin needed to account for regular and continuous glucose metabolism. Typically, a basal insulin dose refers to the injection of a long lasting or intermediate lasting insulin type. If the patient's glucose concentration value is hypo or hyperglycemic, the HCP can recommend that the basal insulin dose be decreased or increased. However, applicant believes that the method for determining exactly how much to increase or decrease a basal insulin dose for a particular time can be difficult to convey to a lay user. To further compound this issue, a user who mistakenly increases an insulin dose by too much can cause serious physiological harm. Determining whether to increase or decrease an insulin basal dose can be based on a sufficient number of fasting glucose concentration values that are hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic. Further, the amount of the increment or decrement can be based on the magnitude of the hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic measurements.
DMU 10 can include a housing 11, user interface buttons (16, 18, and 20), a display 14, a strip port 22, and a data port 13, as illustrated in
The electronic components of DMU 10 can be disposed on a circuit board 34 that is within housing 11.
Operational amplifier circuit 35 can be two or more operational amplifiers configured to provide a portion of the potentiostat function and the current measurement function. The potentiostat function can refer to the application of a test voltage between at least two electrodes of a test strip. The current function can refer to the measurement of a test current resulting from the applied test voltage. The current measurement may be performed with a current-to-voltage converter. Microcontroller 38 can be in the form of a mixed signal microprocessor (MSP) such as, for example, the Texas Instrument MSP 430. The MSP 430 can be configured to also perform a portion of the potentiostat function and the current measurement function. In addition, the MSP 430 can also include volatile and non-volatile memory. In another embodiment, many of the electronic components can be integrated with the microcontroller in the form of an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
Strip port 22 can be configured to form an electrical connection to the test strip. Display connector 14a can be configured to attach to display 14. Display 14 can be in the form of a liquid crystal display for reporting measured glucose levels, and for facilitating entry of lifestyle related information and for manipulation of graphical data, pictorial results and motion video. Display 14 can optionally include a backlight. Data port 13 can accept a suitable connector attached to a connecting lead, thereby allowing DMU 10 to be linked to an external device such as a personal computer. Data port 13 can be any port that allows for transmission of data such as, for example, a serial, USB, or a parallel port. Clock 42 can be configured for measuring time and be in the form of an oscillating crystal. Battery connector 44a can be configured to be electrically connected to a power supply.
In one embodiment, test strip 24 can be in the form of an electrochemical glucose test strip. Test strip 24 can include one or more working electrodes and a counter electrode. Test strip 24 can also include a plurality of electrical contact pads, where each electrode is in electrical communication with at least one electrical contact pad. Strip port 22 can be configured to electrically interface to the electrical contact pads and form electrical communication with the electrodes of test strip 24. Test strip 24 can include a reagent layer that is disposed over at least one electrode. The reagent layer can include an enzyme and a mediator. Exemplary enzymes suitable for use in the reagent layer include glucose oxidase, glucose dehydrogenase (with pyrroloquinoline quinone co-factor, “PQQ”), and glucose dehydrogenase (with flavin adenine dinucleotide co-factor, “FAD”). An exemplary mediator suitable for use in the reagent layer includes ferricyanide, which in this case is in the oxidized form. The reagent layer can be configured to physically transform glucose into an enzymatic by-product and in the process generate an amount of reduced mediator (e.g., ferrocyanide) that is proportional to the glucose concentration value. The working electrode can then measure a concentration of the reduced mediator in the form of a current. In turn, DMU 10 can convert the current magnitude into a glucose concentration value.
Referring back to
In one embodiment, a therapeutic delivery device can be in the form of a “user-activated” therapeutic delivery device, which requires a manual interaction between the device and a user (for example, by a user pushing a button on the device) to initiate a single therapeutic agent delivery event and that in the absence of such manual interaction deliver no therapeutic agent to the user. A non-limiting example of such a user-activated therapeutic agent delivery device is described in co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/040,024; 61/051,258; 61/082,106 and entitled Analyte Measurement and Management Device and Associated Methods, and 61/089,343, which is hereby incorporated in whole by reference. Another non-limiting example of such a user-activated therapeutic agent delivery device is an insulin pen 28. Insulin pens are loaded with a vial or cartridge of insulin, and are attached to a disposable needle. Portions of the insulin pen can be reusable, or the insulin pen can be completely disposable. Insulin pens are commercially available from companies such as Novo Nordisk, Aventis, and Eli Lilly, and can be used with a variety of insulin, such as Novolog, Humalog, Levemir, and Lantus. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0182358 illustrates a drug delivery device for use in conjunction with a protocol from a health care provider. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0182358 is hereby incorporated by reference into this application.
Referring to
Referring to
In user interface 1001, a user can select a particular function or sub-routine such as activate basal insulin adjustment 600 (
Applicants believe that the implementation of the method 900 on a glucose meter will simplify the process of adjusting basal insulin doses. However, applicant also believes that a HCP or diabetes educator should train the user beforehand so that the method can be properly set up on the meter. In one embodiment, the DMU will have method 900 on a memory portion of the meter that can be executed by a microprocessor. A HCP or diabetes educator can activate method 900 on the meter by inputting a special code to unlock this feature on the meter. Alternatively, a user may unlock the meter after being given the code from a HCP or diabetes educator. The following will describe a method 600 for activating the basal insulin adjustment.
The following provides details regarding the inputs for setting up the basal insulin adjustment. Referring to step 608, an insulin type may be Lantus, NPH, Detemir, or pre-mixed. Referring to step 610, a starting insulin dose may range from about 10 units to about 60 units. Referring to step 612, a maximum allowable insulin dose amount may range from about 50 units to about 100 units. Referring to steps 614 and 616, first insulin increment may range from about one to about four units and a second insulin increment may range from about two units to about eight units. Referring to step 616, a first insulin decrement may range from about zero to about ten units.
Applicant believes that safeguards should be implemented for the process of adjusting a user's basal insulin dose to guard against hypoglycemia of the user. As shown in
Referring again to
Note that the first low value can be a glucose concentration of about 50 mg/dL or less. Although steps 816 and 820 refer to a fasting glucose concentration, in one embodiment, method 800 can use any glucose concentration (i.e., fasting and non-fasting) such as, for example, glucose concentrations measured pre-meal, post-meal, before bedtime, before or after breakfast, before or after lunch, before or after dinner, and before or after exercise.
Referring back to steps 816 and 820, consecutive days can include a first day having a first glucose measurement and a second day having a second glucose measurement where the first and second glucose measurements were measured such that two measurements are apart by at least more than a first time interval. In an embodiment, the first time interval is greater than about two hours. By requiring a minimum amount of time between the glucose concentration measurements, pattern recognition safeguards 800 will not prematurely deactivate the insulin algorithm. For example, if two glucose measurements were performed on 11:45 pm on day one and at 12:01 am (six minutes later) on the following day, method 800 would not characterize those two glucose measurements as being on consecutive days.
Note that the meter preferably saves date, time, and flag type with each glucose measurement to a memory portion, which allows a microprocessor to perform the above queries (804, 806, 812, 816, and 820). That is, upon determination of at least one of the first and second low blood glucose concentration patterns (step 818 or 824) of the user, safety notifications are displayed on the display screen of the handheld diabetes data management unit. In particular, if the queries (804, 806, 812, 816, and 820) are all negative, then the DMU 10 can output a suggested basal insulin dose using basal insulin adjustment 900. However, if one of the queries (804, 806, 812, 816, and 820) is in the affirmative, then the DMU 10 may output a notification and may recommend that the user contact a HCP or diabetes educator. In another embodiment, the DMU 10 may output a warning, deactivate or prohibit basal insulin adjustment 900 if the maximum insulin dose is used, the frequency of insulin adjustments is too high, or the glucose concentration values are sufficiently hypoglycemic for a period of time.
The following will describe the messages provided to the user when one of the queries (804, 806, 812, 816, and 820) is in the affirmative. If two or more fasting glucose tests in the last four days were missed (804), then the DMU 10 can output a notice of non-compliance in testing and recommend contacting a HCP, as shown in step 808. Note that query 804 can be modified by a HCP or user to change the number of fasting glucose measurements required and the number of days used for the query. If a fasting glucose test was missed yesterday (806), then the DMU 10 can output a notification of a missed fasting glucose test and recommend that the user test in the morning before breakfast, as shown in step 810. If the fasting glucose concentration values were within target for three consecutive days (12), then the DMU 10 can output a congratulatory message that the user reached the fasting glucose concentration value target, as shown in step 814. If the fasting glucose concentration value was between 50 mg/dL and the low threshold for four consecutive days (816), then the DMU 10 can output a notification of too many low measurements and recommend that the user contact a HCP, as shown in step 818. If the fasting glucose concentration value results were below 50 mg/dL for two consecutive days (820), then the DMU 10 can output a notification of very low glucose concentration values and recommend that the user contact a HCP as soon as possible, as shown in step 824. Optionally, basal insulin adjustment 900 can be deactivated in step 826 after either the occurrence of step 818 or 824.
Once safeguards against hypoglycemia 800 have been performed, the DMU 10 can then determine whether the glucose concentration value is below a low threshold, as shown in step 910. The low threshold may range from about 60 mg/dL to about 100 mg/dL, or preferably be about 70 mg/dL. Note also that step 910 can be modified by a HCP or a user to require that, instead of only one glucose measurement, two to three consecutive glucose measurements must be less than the low threshold. If the fasting glucose concentration value is less than the low threshold, the DMU 10 can output the current basal insulin dose on a display of the DMU 10, as shown in step 912. Once the user confirms the current basal insulin dose, the DMU 10 can decrease the insulin dose by a first decrement, such as, for example, about four units, as shown in step 914.
If the glucose concentration value is not below a low threshold, then the DMU 10 will determine whether the last three fasting glucose measurements were greater than a high threshold, as shown in step 916. In one embodiment, a summary screen may be displayed immediately before or after step 916 where the last three fasting glucose measurement values are displayed on display 14 and the lowest value is highlighted. The high threshold may range from about 100 mg/dL to about 140 mg/dL, or preferably be about 130 mg/dL. If the fasting glucose concentration value is less than the high threshold, then no recommendation to change the current insulin dose will be made, as shown in step 918. If the glucose concentration value is greater than the high threshold, the DMU 10 can output the current basal insulin dose on a display of the DMU 10, as shown in step 920. Once the user confirms the current basal insulin dose, the DMU 10 can determine whether the last three fasting glucose measurements were greater than an upper threshold, as shown in step 922. The upper threshold may range from about 160 mg/dL to about 200 mg/dL, or preferably be about 180 mg/dL. Note that the upper threshold is greater than the high threshold. Note also that steps 916 and 922 can be modified by a HCP or a user to require that a different frequency of consecutive fasting glucose measurements be within a certain range over a different period of days. The DMU 10 can recommend a new insulin dose that is increased by a first increment (e.g., about about two units) where the last 3 consecutive fasting glucose concentration values are less than the upper threshold, but greater than the high threshold, as shown in step 924. Alternatively, the DMU 10 can recommend a new insulin dose that is increased by a second increment (e.g., about four units) where the last three consecutive fasting glucose concentration values are greater than the upper threshold, as shown in step 326. In one embodiment, a basal insulin dose can be taken in the evening before going to bed.
The DMU 10 can then determine whether the lowest value of the three glucose concentration values is below a low threshold, as shown in step 934. If the lowest fasting glucose concentration value is less than the low threshold, the DMU 10 can output a decrease of the insulin dose by a first decrement, such as, for example, about four units, as shown in step 936. However, if the lowest value is not below a low threshold, then the DMU 10 will determine whether the lowest value is greater than the high threshold and less than the upper threshold, as shown in step 938.
The DMU 10 can recommend a new insulin dose that is increased by a first increment (e.g., about two units) where the lowest value is greater than the high threshold, but less than the upper threshold, as shown in step 940. Alternatively, the DMU 10 can determine whether the lowest value is greater than the upper threshold, as shown in step 942. If the lowest value is greater than the upper threshold, then the DMU 10 can recommend a new insulin dose that is increased by a second increment (e.g., about four units), as shown in step 944. If the lowest value is not greater than the upper threshold, then the DMU 10 can recommend no change to the current insulin dose, as shown in step 946.
In one embodiment, method 1001 can be used to output a recommended basal insulin dose that is adjusted based on previous fasting glucose measurements. The recommended dose information can be transferred from first wireless transceiver 46 of DMU 10 to second wireless transceiver of insulin pen 28. A dosage selector of insulin pen 28 can be automatically adjusted to the recommended dose so that a user merely has to press a button on insulin pen 28 to input the recommended amount. When the user presses the button on insulin pen 28, this can cause a signal to be transmitted to DMU 10 so that the time, date, and dosage amount can be recorded to a memory portion of the DMU.
Referring to
In order for the basal insulin therapy of method 1001 to be effective, the user should have a relatively high compliance in performing fasting glucose measurements and also in flagging such measurements as fasting. Accordingly, a predictive process can be implemented on DMU 10 to increase user compliance in flagging fasting glucose measurement as fasting. The following will describe a predictive process that can be implemented for recommending a type of flag before or after outputting a glucose result in step 706 of
In one embodiment, a fasting flag can be recommended based on the time, the day, and/or past user testing patterns. For example, if a user had selected the “fasting” flag at 7 am multiple times, then the meter will suggest that the same “fasting” flag for the next reading performed at around 7 am. In one embodiment, the predictive process may require that at least “n” glucose readings be performed during the same time period with a fasting flag. The minimum number of glucose readings having a matching flag during a particular time interval can be adjusted by the user or health care provider. For example, the sub-routine can require that three of the last five glucose readings for a particular time period have the fasting flag. A time period can be defined as a two hour period, but optionally can be adjusted by the user or health care provider. Once a user is presented with a recommended fasting flag, the user has the option to override the suggestion or accept it.
In another embodiment, a fasting flag can be recommended if the test is the first test of the day. A microprocessor and clock of the DMU 10 can determine the first time in which it is turned on. In another embodiment, a fasting flag can be recommended based on a user inputted meal time schedule. Before performing a glucose test, the user may use the user interface of DMU 10 to input the meal time schedule. Alternatively, a default meal time schedule can be saved to a memory portion of the meter at the factory. If the glucose test is performed before a first meal of the day, then the fasting flag can be recommended. In another embodiment, a fasting flag can be recommended if the glucose test is the first test of the day and is in the morning such as, for example, between 6 am to 10 am. A morning time interval can be defined by the user or be a default setting set when the meter is manufactured.
As noted earlier, the microprocessor can be programmed to generally carry out the steps of various processes described herein. The microprocessor can be part of a particular device, such as, for example, a glucose meter, an insulin pen, an insulin pump, a server, a mobile phone, personal computer, or mobile hand held device. Furthermore, the various methods described herein can be used to generate software codes using off-the-shelf software development tools such as, for example, C, C+, C++, C-Sharp, Visual Studio 6.0, Windows 2000 Server, and SQL Server 2000. The methods, however, may be transformed into other software languages depending on the requirements and the availability of new software languages for coding the methods. Additionally, the various methods described, once transformed into suitable software codes, may be embodied in any computer-readable storage medium that, when executed by a suitable microprocessor or computer, are operable to carry out the steps described in these methods along with any other necessary steps.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. For example, the invention can be applied not only to docking stations and glucose meters, but can also be applied to any electronic device that needs a power supply and that can be re-set such as insulin infusion pump, continuous glucose monitoring system and the like. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. Various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application claims the benefits of priority under 35 USC §119 and/or §120 from prior filed U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/222,006 filed on Jun. 30, 2009, which applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety into this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4731726 | Allen | Mar 1988 | A |
5251126 | Kahn et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5822715 | Worthington et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6179979 | Hodges et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193873 | Ohara et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6280409 | Stone et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284125 | Hodges et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309884 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6379301 | Worthington et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6413410 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425863 | Werner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6475372 | Ohara et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6544212 | Galley et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558351 | Steil et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572542 | Houben et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6633772 | Ford et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635167 | Batman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6656114 | Poulsen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6691043 | Ribeiro, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6716577 | Yu et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6749887 | Dick et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6862466 | Ackerman | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6863801 | Hodges et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890421 | Ohara et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6941163 | Ford et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7022072 | Fox et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7024236 | Ford et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045046 | Chambers et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060059 | Keith et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7179226 | Crothall et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7204823 | Estes et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7241265 | Cummings et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7267665 | Steil et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7282029 | Poulsen et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7291107 | Hellwig et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7291256 | Teodorczyk et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7354420 | Steil et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7399277 | Saidara et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402153 | Steil et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404796 | Ginsberg | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7498132 | Yu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509156 | Flanders | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7553281 | Hellwig et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7651489 | Estes et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20020019707 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026111 | Ackerman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030108976 | Braig et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030175806 | Rule et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208113 | Mault et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030211617 | Jones | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220814 | Gordon | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040059201 | Ginsberg | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050004439 | Shin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027182 | Siddiqui et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050090726 | Ackerman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096511 | Fox et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096512 | Fox et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113653 | Fox et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143864 | Bloomquist | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050176153 | O'Hara et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182358 | Veit et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050214892 | Kovatchev et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070010950 | Abensour et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016127 | Staib et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016449 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070060803 | Liljeryd et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060813 | Chang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083335 | Moerman et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118589 | Brown | May 2007 | A1 |
20070173761 | Kanderiab, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070208246 | Brauker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231914 | Deng et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070232880 | Siddiqui et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070287985 | Estes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080045819 | Emoto et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045825 | Melker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052057 | Brown | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097289 | Steil et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080119702 | Reggiardo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119710 | Reggiardo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125636 | Ward et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080139910 | Mastrototaro et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154513 | Kovatchev et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080171967 | Bloomquist | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172027 | Bloomquist | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172028 | Bloomquist | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172029 | Bloomquist | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172031 | Bloomquist | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177154 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183060 | Steil et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187943 | Buse et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188796 | Steil et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199465 | Lake et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206799 | Blomquist | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234992 | Ray et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235053 | Ray et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255438 | Saidara et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262088 | Hauck et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268485 | Guarino et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269585 | Ginsberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294024 | Cosentino et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312512 | Brukalo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312518 | Jina et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006129 | Thukral et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018495 | Panduro | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018779 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030733 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090098587 | Hetzel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099506 | Estes et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099509 | Estes et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105570 | Sloan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112069 | Kanamori et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112626 | Talbot et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090137455 | Steiner et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149717 | Brauer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150186 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156923 | Power et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156924 | Shariati et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177147 | Blomquist et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090184004 | Chatiler et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090237262 | Smith et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240127 | Ray | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247982 | Krulevitch et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292190 | Miyashita | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100016700 | Sieh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100041084 | Stephens et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041960 | Yuan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100174228 | Buckingham et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0483595 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1338295 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1568310 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1677226 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1770396 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1840219 | Oct 2007 | EP |
WO 9837805 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 0200112 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 03030731 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03045233 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004015539 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004023972 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2005093629 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006066038 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006066583 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006133348 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007005170 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007019289 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007019384 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007028271 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007101260 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149533 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008071218 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008071444 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008073609 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008094249 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009005952 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009005960 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009016050 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009137661 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/040434, International Search Report, dated Oct. 20, 2010, 3 pgs, European Patent Office, Rijswijk. |
International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/040383, dated Nov. 4, 2010, 3 pages, European Patent Office, Rijswijk. |
International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/040425, Dated Dec. 23, 2010, 7 pages, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, Netherlands. |
Partial International Search Report, Annex to Form PCT/ISA/206, PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/040309, Dated Nov. 29, 2010, 2 pages, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, Netherlands. |
International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2010/001683, Dated Dec. 22, 2010, 4 pages, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, Netherlands. |
Nathan, D.M., Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy, Diabetes Care, vol. 29 No. 8, 1963-1972, Aug. 2006. |
William H. et al. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. ISBN 0-521-43108-5, pp. 226-230. |
“Accu-Chek Complete Owner's Booklet”, Roche Diagnostics, 2004, XP002636883, Retrieved from internet: URL:https://www.accu-chek.com/us/customer-care/downloads.html [retrieved May 12, 2011], p. 8, pp. 33-40, pp. 46 and 86. |
International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/040443, dated May 17, 2011, 3 pages, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, NL. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100332142 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61222006 | Jun 2009 | US |