This invention pertains to anatomical acoustic-signal data collection with noise-suppression capability, and in particular, to such data collection with respect to which noise suppression which takes place, when required, with respect to the acquisition of anatomical data, and specifically data such as heart-sound data, is performed to enable accurate detection of important diagnostic heart sounds, such as the S1, S2, S3 and S4 heart sounds. While aspects of the invention—two preferred embodiments of which are disclosed herein—certainly have applicability in various fields of endeavor, these preferred embodiments, and the related manners of practicing the invention, have been found, as just suggested above, to offer particular utility in the examination of the functionality of the human heart through collecting and observing the conditions of heart sounds, such as the four heart sounds identified above.
In one embodiment of the invention, noise suppression is the “default norm” of behavior of the invention. In the other embodiment, noise suppression becomes an implemented and significant option under circumstances where collected anatomical signals, “tested” for excess noise content against what are referred to herein as “Gold Standard, non-noise affected, representative expected signals, are determined to include excess, “masking” noise.
Accordingly, and now describing and illustrating this invention, in the heart-sound-collection environment, heart sounds carry important diagnostic information about the mechanical and hemodynamic characteristics of the human heart. The main frequency content of such sounds, and in particular that of the S3 and S4 heart sounds, is well below 100-Hz, and their intensity is small. Both of these characteristics make it quite difficult for physicians to discern those heart sounds effectively and confidently.
Electronic processing, and/or computerized analysis of electronically collected heart sounds, help through a blend of appropriate filtering, of amplification of heart-sound signals, and of appropriate display and labeling of related traces or curves (typically time-based). However, applying filtering to heart-sound data only helps if the frequency content of ever-present noise is significantly different in frequency relative to that of the heart sounds of interest, per se. While the influence of ambient noise on sound-sensor systems can be reduced through sturdy and appropriate signal-collection design, those systems in the prior art have not been found to be immune to noise that is coupled to an acoustic sensor through the skin surface of a patient, i.e., through vibrations moving the whole body of a patient or simply moving just the skin in the area where a sound sensor, or transducer, is applied to the anatomy. This type of skin-conveyed (or skin-transported) noise can have frequency content which is similar to that of desired heart sounds, and is therefore often not distinguishable from heart sounds. Typical examples of environments where such noise presents problems includes the environments of emergency vehicles when an engine is running, such as in airplanes and helicopters, and even facility ventilation systems which are located in the vicinity of a patient whose heart sounds are to be collected for observation.
The present invention, in the herein-disclosed embodiment thereof wherein noise suppression is always, by default, invoked, features a system and a methodology which specially address these concerns. This system and methodology allow for and promote detection of heart sounds in noisy environments through utilizing a pair of sound sensors (also referred to herein as acoustic-to-electrical transducers) applied to a patient's chest, from which sensors collected sounds are subjected to a special noise-suppression approach which is uniquely proposed by the structure and methodology of the present invention.
Noise suppression, or cancellation, as proposed by the present invention, takes advantage of the physical nature of low-frequency heart sounds and potentially interfering noise sounds. Sounds with frequencies below about 100-Hz travel through the human body mainly in the form of shear waves having low propagation speeds which lie typically in the range of about 1- to about 10-meter(s)-per-second. The exact propagation speed will depend on the density and the shear modulus of the particular material(s) through which the waves
I have discovered that if two or more sound sensors are placed in relative close proximity to each other, i.e., within about 2- to about 3-centimeters or so from one another, one can easily detect that the frequency content and the phase relationships of acoustic signals collected by those sensors are different. These differences are normal and expected, since sound waves transmitted from the heart to such two sensors will travel unavoidably through slightly different mechanical, anatomical paths in the human body. Such different paths have different lengths and different material make-ups, and this means that the travel time for sounds in these two paths will differ for a given sound and for each of the employed (skin-attaches) acoustic sensors.
However, in contrast to near-field heart-generated sounds, external sound vibrations, that is, sound vibrations existing in the environment which is on the outside of the anatomy, will couple into such plural sound sensors directly through the surface of the human body, i.e. through the skin, via surface waves. Since these external sound vibrations effectively have a far-field source, and since the propagation speed on the anatomical surface is essentially the same for all such far-field acoustic signals, these signals, referred to herein as noise, will appear to be in phase and characterized with the same frequency content in each one of the anatomical-contact sensors employed.
Accordingly, these fundamental differences between the natures and propagation properties of heart sounds as compared to external vibration noise can be used to construct, as proposed herein, a simple and unique noise-cancellation system contemplated by the present invention.
In accordance the particular embodiment of the invention wherein noise suppression always takes place, and in relation to the other mentioned embodiment of the invention when it is “activated” to suppress noise, the manner of practicing noise suppression is illustrated herein in the context of the utilization of two acoustic, or sound, transducers attached to the anatomical surface, preferably at the conventional V3 and V4 ECG signal sites on the anatomy. Signals collected by these two transducers will, in each case, include a combination of heart-sound-signals blended (combined) with skin-surface-conveyed, external, acoustic noise signals.
Recognizing the differences which will exist in each combined signal (as described above) with respect to (a) signals coming from the heart, and (b) signals coming from external sources, a very simple subtraction of one of these two acquired signals from the other, in the particular case where two sound transducers are employed, will produce, effectively, a full cancellation of in-phase surface-conveyed noise signals, and a very clear revelation at the same time of the desired-to-be-detected heart signals.
These and other specific and more generalized utility features of the present invention will now become more fully apparent as the description of the two embodiments which follows is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Turning now to the drawings, and referring first of all to
Outside environmental sounds from block 12 are effectively ultimately coupled to a pair of what are referred to herein as close-proximity sound sensors, also called acoustical-to-electrical transducers, T1, T2 represented by blocks 16, 18, respectively. These sensors, which are referred to collectively as a plural-signal receiver, are placed in contact with a person's anatomy during use of this invention, with transducer T1, for example, being placed on the anatomy at the well-known V3 ECG electrical signal site, and transducer T2 being placed at the well-known V4 ECG electrical signal site. The specific positions just mentioned associated with transducers T1, T2, could, of course, be reversed, and it should also be recognized that more than two transducers could be employed, in accordance with practice of the invention, if a user so desires. Notwithstanding that latter statement, a preferred practice of the invention, as illustrated and described herein, is styled to employ simply the two transducers designated 16, 18.
Acoustical signals generated by source 12 are coupled to transducers 16, 18 through what is referred to herein as a common, undifferentiated conveyance medium, such being represented by block 20, labeled COMMON MEDIUM A. Medium A herein is very specifically the skin of a person with respect to whom the methodology of the invention is being practiced. As was mentioned earlier herein, this common, skin medium effectively delivers sounds from source 12 in phase, and substantially simultaneously, through low-propagation-velocity shear waves. As a reminder, the practice of the present invention is primarily concerned with unraveling noise confusion with respect to acoustic signals lying in a range generally below about 100-Hz. As was also mentioned earlier herein, propagation speeds for such signals in the form of shear waves carried by the skin might typically lie in the range from about 1- to about 10-meter(s)-per-second. Signals arriving at transducers 16, 18 through common medium A(20) are essentially in phase with one another at the location of transducers 16, 18.
By contrast, sounds emanating from the heart (source 14), which include the S1, S2, S3 and S4 sounds that are desired to be detected accurately, propagate toward transducers 16, 18 via two different anatomical paths made up of specific anatomical components, so to speak, which lie in the respective paths between the heart and the skin surface locations where transducers 16, 18 are placed. These two different paths are referred to herein as being two different transducer-specific media, and they are represented by blocks 22, 24 in
What one will note from the environment pictured in
Directing attention now to
Digressing for just a moment to
The combined acoustical-to-electrical signals arriving from sensors 16, 18, which combined signals are represented, respectively, by blocks 26, 28, are coupled through appropriate signal-data connections 34, 36, respectively, to block 30 (seen in
Turning for a moment to
Returning attention especially to
Following performance of subtraction within block 30, and further in accordance with what is shown in
Turning attention now to
If the “answer” to the “question” posed by block 54 is YES, signal subtraction to suppress noise is performed in block 60 which is the equivalent of previously described block 30 in
If the answer to this question is NO, block 56 selects, for sending to outputting block 58, that particular, transducer-collected sound signal which appears to contain the lower amount of noise. The particular, “acceptable”, lower amount of noise which will be “permitted” so as not to invoke implementation of the “option” here of using or not using noise suppression is entirely a matter of user choice, and those skilled in the relevant art will fully understand how to make such an “acceptance” determination. From, and in, such a selected, but not noise-suppressed, output signal, the S1, S2, S3 and S4 heart sounds are and will be made readable.
From an implementation point of view, the invention may be viewed as offering a method for differentiating two, different-character acoustic signals emanating from a pair of different sources and arriving substantially contemporaneously as combined signals at the sites of a pair of acoustical-to-electrical transducers, where signals arriving at these transducers from one of the sources arrives for both transducers via a common, undifferentiated conveyance medium, and signals arriving from the other source arrive for each transducer via transducer-specific, different conveyance media, and where it is desired to focus attention on a selected and desired category of information conveyed from the other source, with this method including the steps of (a) utilizing such two transducers to acquire common-time-base, combined, two-source acoustical signals, (b) subtracting a selected one of these combined signals from the other combined signal, and by such subtracting, (c) distinguishing and revealing the mentioned selected and desired information acquired from acoustic signals emanating from the other source.
Another view of the invention sees it as providing a method for obtaining and clarifying heart sounds in the presence of noise including (a) establishing a plural-signal receiver, (b) implementing between the human heart and the established plural-signal receiver a pair of different-character, physiological, sound-signal conveyance paths, (c) acquiring from such paths generally common-character, but path-differentiated, different, common-time-base, heart-produced sound signals, (d) performing, for noise “suppression” purposes, a defined sound-signal-from-sound-signal subtraction of a selected one of such acquired sound signals from the other acquired sound signal, and (e) thereafter utilizing the result of such subtraction to produce a human-heart-characteristic interpretable output signal.
Still a further methodologic view of the invention is that it involves (a) declaring low-frequency sounds which arrive at a pair of anatomy-attached sound transducers from the heart to be near-field sounds, (b) declaring all other low-frequency sounds which arrive at the same transducers to be near-field sounds, and (c) employing the arriving far-field sounds in a self-cancellation mode to clarify information content in the arriving near-field sounds.
Thus, plural preferred embodiments of, and manners of practicing, the present invention have been illustrated and described. The invention proposes a very simple and effective system for, and manner of, ridding collected anatomical acoustic data of troublesome far-field noise activity, thus to reveal with good accuracy the mentioned four important S1, S2, S3 and S4 heart sounds.
Other modifications and variations of the invention may become apparent to those skilled in the relevant art, and all such modifications and variations are considered to come with in the scope and spirit of the invention.
This application claims priority to prior-filed, currently co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/677,885, filed May 4, 2005, for “Noise Cancellation Method and Apparatus for Heart Sounds”. The entire disclosure content of that Provisional Application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60677885 | May 2005 | US |