In preparing subterranean wells for production, a sealing system such as a well packer may be run into the well on a work string or a production tubing, optionally with other completion equipment, such as a screen adjacent to a producing formation. The packer may be used to seal the annulus between the outside of the production tubing and the inside of the well casing to block movement of fluids through the annulus past the packer location. The packer may include anchor slips having opposed camming surfaces that cooperate with complementary wedging surfaces, whereby the anchor slips are radially extendible into gripping engagement against the well casing bore in response to relative axial movement of the wedging surfaces. The packer also carries annular seal elements which are expandable radially into sealing engagement against the bore of the well casing in response to axial compression forces. Longitudinal movement of the packer components which set the anchor slips and the sealing elements may be produced hydraulically or mechanically, or the packer may be hydrostatically set.
One challenge to packer design is that the forces involved in setting the packer may deform the casing. With conventional slips, the multi-point loading of the casing wall will deform the casing into a predisposed slip pattern corresponding to the number of individual slips used. Nodes will appear on the casing outer diameter corresponding to each slip segment. This result is not desirable, as it will then become very difficult to land and properly set another packer after the first one is removed. Further, the tubing in such wells is typically made of an expensive, corrosion-resistant alloy, and scratches and indentations can act as stress risers or corrosion points.
To reduce deformation of casing, longer slips are sometimes used to distribute the load more evenly and/or over a larger area of the casing. However, increasing slip length to distribute the load may reduce the force below that required to achieve a reliable slip tooth penetration into the casing. Another approach to reducing casing deformation is to deploy the slip teeth in a pre-defined sequence. Conventionally, this requires the slips and/or wedges to deform for the successive loading surface (hump). The deformation of the slip and/or wedges may have adverse effects during production or retrieval.
These drawings illustrate certain aspects of some of the embodiments of the present disclosure and should not be used to limit or define the method.
Disclosed herein are tools and related methods for anchoring a well tool in a tubular member, such as a casing, wherein individual wedge sections may be progressively loaded against a slip without undesirable deformation of the wedge sections. The anchor slip assembly includes multiple wedge sections that are initially formed with an axial gap between adjacent wedge sections. The gaps may initially be maintained by a compliant member between adjacent wedge sections. The compliant member in some embodiments comprise a concealed tab unitarily formed along a channel defined between the adjacent wedge sections, such as using an additive manufacturing process. As the wedge sections are axially loaded, the compliant member will yield or fail prior to full engagement of all the wedge sections, to close the gap between the corresponding adjacent wedge sections. In this manner, the wedge sections are progressively loaded. Desirably, the compliant members allow for progressive loading without deformation of the parent structure of the wedge sections.
In one example, there are at least three wedge sections axially arranged adjacent one another. An axial force may be applied to the first wedge section to axially urge the three wedge sections along a mandrel. The third wedge section is first to radially engage the slip. A tab between the second and third wedge section fails or deforms to bring the second wedge section closer to the third wedge section, so the second wedge section engages the slip. Finally, a tab between the first and second wedge sections fails or deforms, closing a gap therebetween so the first wedge section radially engages the slip. In that way, the wedge sections progressively load the slip from the third wedge section to the second wedge section to the first wedge section, until all three wedge sections have fully engaged the slip into biting engagement with the casing. Of course, the compliant members, gaps between wedge sections, and other design parameters may be adjusted within the scope of this disclosure to achieve deployment of the wedge sections in any desired order or loading sequence.
The packer 10 includes a mandrel 34 for supporting various components thereon. The mandrel 34 is connected to the tubing string 26, which extends to a wellhead at the ground level (aka “surface”) of the well site, for conducting produced fluids from the hydrocarbon bearing formation 2 to the surface. The lower end of the casing 14, which intersects the hydrocarbon bearing formation 2, may be perforated to allow well fluids such as oil and gas to flow from the hydrocarbon bearing formation 2 through the casing 14 into the well bore 12. The packer 10 in this example is releasably set by the anchor slip assembly 28, meaning the packer has the ability for the anchor slip assembly 28 to be subsequently released later to retrieve the packer 10 if needed. The seal element assembly 30 also mounted on the mandrel 34 is expanded against the well casing 14 for providing a fluid tight seal between the mandrel and the well casing, so that formation pressure is held in the well bore below the seal assembly. That way, formation fluids are forced into the bore of the packer 10 to flow to the surface through the production tubing string 26. The anchor slip assembly 28 may be set by axial actuation of certain components on the mandrel, e.g., via hydraulic actuation, as further discussed below. The seal element assembly 30 may be similarly set by axial actuation.
The packer 10 is set by an actuator assembly 40, which is hydraulically operated in this example but could alternatively be controlled by mechanical or electronic actuators, or combinations thereof. Although the present discussion focuses on setting of the anchor slip assembly 28, the same actuator assembly 40 or another actuator may be used to actuate the seal element assembly 30 of
The actuator assembly 40 includes a piston 42 concentrically mounted on the mandrel 34 below the anchor slip assembly 28. The piston 42 is coupled to the lowest or outermost wedge section 92 by an axially-slidable force transmitting sleeve 100. The piston 42 carries annular seals “S” in sealing engagement against the external surface of the mandrel 34 and is also slidably sealed against the external surface of the bottom connector sub 38. The piston 42 encloses an annular chamber 44, which is open to the cylindrical bore 36 at port 46. Hydraulic pressure may be applied through the cylindrical bore 36 to the inlet port 46 to pressurize the annular chamber 44 and urge the piston 42 upward. The force transmitting sleeve 100 is thereby axially shifted by the piston 42 into axial engagement with the first wedge section 92, urging the first wedge section 92 upward. The three wedge sections 92, 94, 96 are coupled so that the force and upward movement of the first wedge section 92 is transferred, in turn, to the second, and third wedge sections 94, 96, to collectively urge the slip 80 radially outwardly into engagement with the casing 14.
An anchor slip assembly according to this disclosure may include any number of slips, wedge sections, and/or sets of wedge sections. By way of example,
As an axial force “F” is applied to the first wedge section 92, such as by the force transmitting sleeve 100 of
In the
The adjacent wedge sections 92, 94 are also interlocking in the sense that, even disregarding the tab 93, the structure of the adjacent wedge sections 92, 94 and how they are coupled limit a range of axial movement between the two wedge sections 92, 94, including limiting how far they may be axially separated. More particularly, this interlocking configuration comprises a catch 120 that includes cooperating catch members 122, 124 on adjacent wedge sections 92, 94. When coupled as shown, the catch members 122, 124 cooperate (e.g., by interference therebetween) to limit a range of axial separation between the adjacent wedge sections 92, 94. The packer or other tool may be retrievable, in which case moving the first wedge section 92 axially away from the second wedge section 94 (opposite the direction of force F in
The compliant member may take any of a variety of configurations and is not limited to being a tab or the particular location of
When the axial force F is initiated, the tabs at each interlocking portion 4A and 4B (discussed above) are still intact. Therefore, as the axial force “F” is applied to the first wedge section 92, all three wedge sections 92, 94, 96 will initially move together to the left along the mandrel 34. The third (left) wedge section 96 is initially just contacting the inwardly facing ramp 86 of the slip 80, while there is still a slight separation at 103 between the inwardly facing ramp 82 and outwardly facing ramp 102 of the first (right) wedge section 92. Therefore, the third wedge section 96 will be first to engage the slip 80 and start urging it radially outwardly toward engagement with the casing 14.
The compliant tab at interlocking portion 4B (on the left), being thinner and less stiff than the tab at interlocking portion 4A (on the right), will yield or fail before the tab at interlocking portion 4A in response to force F. Failure of that tab will cause the gap (G2) between the second and third wedge sections 94, 96 to close. As the first and second wedge sections 92, 94 then move together to the left, the second (middle) wedge section 94 engages and increases its engagement with the slip 80 at the corresponding inwardly facing ramp 84. As the force F increases and continues to be applied, the tab in the other interlocking portion 4B will eventually fail, causing the gap (G1) between the first and second wedge sections 92, 94 to close. The first (right) wedge section 96 will be last of those three wedge sections to engage the slip.
The geometry of the anchor slip assembly 28 may be designed to achieve the desired sequence and timing of deployment of the wedge sections. In the above example, the third (left) wedge section 96 is the first to engage the slip, followed by the second (middle) wedge section 94 and then the first (right) wedge section 96. The geometry such as the spacing between wedge sections and the configurations of the tab or other compliant members can be selected at the design stage to adjust or fine-tune how gradually each wedge section will deploy. The deployment of the wedge sections may also be overlapping in terms of the onset and rate of deployment. For example, although the third (left) wedge section 96 may be first to engage, the second (middle) wedge section 94 may start to engage the slip 80 before the third wedge section has reached full deployment (maximum radial force on the slip). Likewise, the first wedge section 96 may start to engage the slip 80 before the second or third wedge section have reached full deployment. The effect is still to initiate load from one side (the left side in
It should be recognized that another sequence could be achieved, if desired. For example, the order of the deployment could even be reversed, if desired, by making the tab in 4B stouter than the tab in 4A, and/or by adjusting the length of the wedge sections so that the first wedge section 92 contacts the slip before the second and third wedge sections 94, 96. The stiffness and locations of the tabs or other compliant members, as well as the gaps between adjacent wedge sections, may also be adjusted in the design of the anchor slip assembly 28 to control the differential of engagement, such as the timing and how rapidly the radial load on one wedge section increases with respect to the other wedge section(s).
As can be understood in view of the above description, a feature of this disclosure in its various embodiments is that relative movement between wedge sections may be allowed, optionally with deformation of a sacrificial member such as a tab, but without deforming the wedge sections themselves. This is preferable to a rigid, unitary structure of wedge sections, which would require deformation and possible damage to that structure to achieve progressive loading. The tab or other compliant member preferentially deforms, rather than the parent structure of the wedge sections.
In addition to a sequential or progressive engagement of the wedge sections, the anchor slip assembly 28 the interlocking aspect of the wedge sections also allows for the sequential disengagement of the wedge sections. The progressive disengagement is particularly useful in a retrievable tool design.
Related methods are also within the scope of this disclosure, wherein the deployment of individual wedge sections is controlled, in part, by the selection of compliant members disposed between adjacent wedge sections. The wedge sections may be deployed and loaded in any desired order or progression based on the parameters set forth herein. Broadly, one example method of setting a well tool involves disposing the well tool, such as a packer, downhole in a tubing segment, such as a casing cemented in a wellbore. A plurality of wedge sections are arranged between a mandrel and a slip. An axial force is applied to a first wedge section in a direction toward a second wedge section to progressively move the first wedge section and the second wedge section into radial engagement with the slip. A first compliant member disposed between the first and second wedge sections is yielded or failed at some point during the loading to move the first wedge section closer to the second wedge sections, which varies the subsequent relative radial engagement of the first wedge section with respect to the radial engagement of the second wedge section.
Any number of wedge sections may be employed. For example, this example method may further include applying the axial force to the first wedge section to progressively move the first wedge section, the second wedge section adjacent to the first wedge section, and also a third wedge section adjacent to the second wedge section into radial engagement with the slip. The method may also involve yielding a second compliant member disposed between the second and third wedge sections to move the second wedge section toward the third wedge section, to vary the radial engagement of the third wedge section with respect to the radial engagement of the first or second wedge section.
Accordingly, the present disclosure may provide an anchor slip assembly for a well tool, such as a packer, wherein individual wedge sections may be progressively deployed in any given order or sequence, to progressively load a slip. The tool may be retrievable, in which case the anchor slip assembly may allow for progressively unsetting of the wedge sections via relative axial movement between the wedge sections. Related methods for using the anchor assembly are also within the scope of this disclosure, as are systems and tools employing such an anchor slip assembly. The methods/systems/compositions/tools may include any of the various features disclosed herein, including one or more of the following statements.
Statement 1. A well tool, comprising: a mandrel; a slip disposed about the mandrel and including a plurality of inwardly facing ramps and an outwardly facing tubing engagement portion; a plurality of wedge sections axially arranged along the mandrel to form at least one pair of adjacent wedge sections, each wedge section including an outwardly facing ramp for slidably engaging a corresponding one of the inwardly facing ramps on the slip; a gap defined between adjacent wedge sections allowing a range of axial movement of one toward the other; and a compliant member disposed between the adjacent wedge sections resisting movement of the one toward the other.
Statement 2. The well tool of Statement 1, wherein the compliant member includes a tab initially coupling the adjacent wedge sections, the tab configured to yield without yielding of the adjacent wedge sections in response to the movement of the one toward the other to close the gap.
Statement 3. The well tool of Statement 2, wherein the tab is configured to fail in response to movement of the adjacent wedge sections toward one another to close the gap.
Statement 4. The well tool of Statements 2 or 3, wherein the tab is concealed between the adjacent wedge sections and is unitarily formed with the adjacent wedge sections as a product of an additive manufacturing process.
Statement 5. The well tool of any of Statements 2-4, wherein the tab is configured with a stress concentration to preferentially yield before the adjacent wedge sections or another tab.
Statement 6. The well tool of any of Statements 1-5, further comprising: the plurality of wedge sections include at least a first wedge section, a second wedge section adjacent the first wedge section, and a third wedge section adjacent the second wedge section.
Statement 7. The well tool of Statement 6, wherein the compliant member between adjacent wedge sections includes a first compliant member between the first and second wedge sections and a second compliant member between the second and third wedge sections, wherein the first compliant member is stiffer than the second compliant member.
Statement 8. The well tool of Statement 7, wherein each compliant member includes a tab, and the tab between the first and second wedge sections is stiffer than the tab between the second and third wedge sections.
Statement 9. The well tool of Statement 6 or 7, wherein the gap between the first and second wedge sections is greater than the gap between the second and third wedge sections.
Statement 10. The well tool of any of Statements 1-7, further comprising: a catch including cooperating catch members on adjacent wedge sections that, when engaged, cooperate to limit a range of axial separation between the adjacent wedge sections.
Statement 11. The well tool of Statement 10, further comprising: a connector including a first connector member on a first wedge section of a pair and a second connector member on a second wedge section of that pair, wherein the first and second connector members include cooperating catch members, and wherein one of the first and second connector members is flexible to connect the connector members upon axial engagement of the first wedge section with the second wedge section.
Statement 12. The well tool of any of Statements 1-6, further comprising: the plurality of wedge sections including at least a first wedge section, a second wedge section adjacent the first wedge section, and a third wedge section adjacent the second wedge section; and a range of axial separation between the first and second wedge sections is greater than a range of axial separation between the second and third wedge sections.
Statement 13. The well tool of any of Statements 1-12, wherein the tubing engagement portion of the slip is a casing engagement portion having a plurality of teeth for engagement with a casing.
Statement 14. A method of setting a well tool, comprising: disposing the well tool downhole; of a plurality of wedge sections arranged along a mandrel, applying an axial force to a first wedge section in a direction toward a second wedge section to progressively move the first wedge section and the second wedge section into radial engagement with a slip; and yielding a first compliant member disposed between the first and second wedge sections to move the first wedge section toward the second wedge sections to vary the radial engagement of the first wedge section with respect to the radial engagement of the second wedge section.
Statement 15. The method of Statement 14, further comprising: radially engaging the second wedge section with the slip before radially engaging the first wedge section with the slip; and wherein yielding the first compliant member includes increasing the axial force on the first wedge section after radially engaging the second wedge section with the slip.
Statement 16. The method of Statement 13 or 14, wherein yielding the first compliant member includes failing the compliant member in response to the axial force applied to the first wedge section.
Statement 17. The method of any of Statement 14-16, further comprising: applying the axial force to the first wedge section to progressively move the first wedge section, the second wedge section adjacent to the first wedge section, and a third wedge section adjacent to the second wedge section into radial engagement with the slip.
Statement 18. The method of Statement 17, further comprising: yielding a second compliant member disposed between the second and third wedge sections to move the second wedge section toward the third wedge section, to vary the radial engagement of the third wedge section with respect to the radial engagement of the first or second wedge section.
Statement 19. The method of Statement 18, further comprising: radially engaging the third wedge section with the slip before radially engaging the first wedge section with the slip; and yielding the second compliant member before yielding the first compliant member, to close a gap between the second wedge section and the third wedge section before closing a gap between the first wedge section and the second wedge section.
Statement 20. A well tool, comprising: a mandrel; a slip disposed about the mandrel and comprising a plurality of inwardly facing ramps and an outwardly facing casing engagement portion; at least first, second, and third wedge sections axially arranged along the mandrel between the mandrel and the slip, with the first wedge section adjacent the second wedge section and the second wedge section adjacent the third wedge section, each wedge section including an outwardly facing ramp for slidably engaging a corresponding one of the inwardly facing ramps on the slip, and with a gap initially defined between the first and second wedge sections and a gap initially defined between the second and third wedge sections; a first compliant member disposed between the first and second wedge sections resisting movement of the one toward the other and a second compliant member disposed between the second and third wedge sections resisting movement of one toward the other; and wherein one or both of second and third wedge sections radially engage the slip prior to the first wedge section.
Therefore, the present embodiments are well adapted to attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the present embodiments may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Although individual embodiments are discussed, all combinations of each embodiment are contemplated and covered by the disclosure. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. Also, the terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee. It is therefore evident that the particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5566762 | Braddick et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5720343 | Kilgore et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
7779910 | Watson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
3066065 | Buckner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
10060217 | Murphree et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10458200 | Tse | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10954736 | Schmidt | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20030226668 | Zimmerman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20120298379 | Van Riet | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140209325 | Dockweiler | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20170370176 | Frazier | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1030031 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1172520 | Jan 2002 | EP |
20151175 | Mar 2016 | NO |
2014-044630 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO-2015130419 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO-2017151384 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2021/018752, dated Nov. 2, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220251915 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |