Not applicable.
Not applicable.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to the field of tendon anchoring devices for post-tension concrete reinforcing systems. More particularly, the invention relates to taper angles for wedges and anchor bases used in such devices and arrangement of the initial gap position of the segments of a retaining wedge to improve tensile strength of tendon anchoring systems.
2. Background Art
The present invention is described herein primarily with reference to post-tension anchoring devices and systems. However, the invention can be used in any application requiring retention of a tendon within an anchorage or other device that transfers tension from the tendon to another structure. Such applications include, without limitation, prestress chucks and couplers, post tensioning applications for bridges, post tension jacks, cable stay wedges, post tensioning applications for roads, bridge tie-backs, mine shaft wall and roof retainers, wall retainers and wall forming systems, multi head stressing jacks, heavy cable lifting systems, post tensioning slabs, barrier cable systems and single post tensioning rams.
As is relates to post-tension anchoring systems, the background of the invention can be described as follows. For quite some time, the design of concrete structures imitated typical steel structure designs of columns, girders and beams. With technological advances in structural concrete, however, designs specific to concrete structures began to evolve. Concrete has several advantages with respect to steel, including lower cost, not requiring fireproofing, and having plasticity, a quality that lends itself to free flowing or boldly massive architectural concepts. On the other hand, structural concrete, though quite capable of carrying almost any compressive (vertical) load, is essentially unable to carry significant tensile loads. In order to enable concrete structures to carry tensile loads, it is necessary, therefore, to add steel bars, called reinforcements, to the concrete. The reinforcements enable the concrete to carry the compressive loads and the steel to carry the tensile (horizontal) loads.
Structures made from reinforced concrete may be built with load-bearing walls, but this configuration does not use the full potential of the concrete. The skeleton frame, in which the floors and roofs rest directly on exterior and interior reinforced-concrete columns, has proven to be most economical and popular method of building concrete structures. Reinforced-concrete framing appears to be a quite simple form of construction. First, wood or steel forms are constructed in the sizes, positions, and shapes called for by engineering and design requirements. Steel reinforcing is then placed and held in position by wires at its intersections. Devices known as chairs and spacers are used to keep the reinforcing bars apart and raised off the formwork. The size and number of the steel bars depends upon the imposed loads and the need to transfer these loads evenly throughout the building and down to the foundation. After the reinforcing is set in place, the concrete, a mixture of water, cement, sand, and stone or aggregate, of proportions calculated to produce the required compressive strength, is placed, care being taken to prevent voids or honeycombs.
One of the simplest designs for concrete frames is the beam-and-slab. The beam and slab system follows ordinary steel design that uses concrete beams that are cast integrally with the floor slabs. The beam-and-slab system is often used in apartment buildings and other structures where the beams are not visually objectionable and can be hidden. The reinforcement is simple and the forms for casting can be used over and over for the same shape. The beam and slab system, therefore, produces an economically advantageous structure.
With the development of flat-slab construction, exposed beams can be eliminated. In the flat slab system, reinforcing bars are projected at right angles and in two directions from every column supporting flat slabs spanning twelve or fifteen feet in both directions. Reinforced concrete reaches its highest potentialities when it is used in pre-stressed or post-tensioned members. Spans as great as 100 feet can be attained in members as deep as three feet for roof loads. The basic principle is simple. In pre-stressing, reinforcing rods of high tensile strength steel are stretched to a certain determined limit and then high-strength concrete is placed around them. When the concrete has set, it holds the steel in a tight grip, preventing slippage or sagging. Post-tensioning follows the same principle, but the reinforcing is held loosely in place while the concrete is placed around it. The reinforcing is then stretched by hydraulic jacks and securely anchored into place. Prestressing is performed with individual members in the shop and post-tensioning is performed as part of the structure on the construction site. In a typical tendon tensioning anchor assembly in such post-tensioning operations, there is provided a pair of anchors for anchoring the ends of the tendons suspended therebetween. In the course of installing the tendon tensioning anchor assembly in a concrete structure, a hydraulic jack or the like is releasably attached to one of the exposed ends of the tendon for applying a predetermined amount of tension to the tendon. When the desired amount of tension is applied to the tendon, wedges, threaded nuts, or the like, are used to capture the tendon and, as the jack is removed from the tendon, to prevent its relaxation and hold it in its stressed condition.
One such post tensioning system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,937,607 issued to Rodormer. The general principle is explained with respect to FIG. 3 in the '607 patent and states, in relevant part, “[i]n accordance with conventional techniques, a center hole electro-hydraulic jack is placed on each tendon to tension the tendon. When the jack is released the live end anchor chuck 40 will set and grip the tendon holding the latter at the desired tension.” The retaining wedge known in the art is typically a conical-exterior shaped insert that fits in a mating, tapered opening in an anchor plate. The mated, tapered opening in the anchor plate is typically referred to as a bore. The wedge may be divided into two or more circumferential segments to enable application to the exterior of the tendon or cable prior to insertion into the opening in the anchor plate. The interior opening of the wedge typically includes conventional buttress threads in order to deform and thus grip the exterior surface of the tendon or cable, such that when the jack or tensioning device is released, the tension in the tendon will be transferred to the wedge, and thus to the anchor plate (or other load transfer device).
The wedge and the wedge receiving bore of all anchor systems known in the art have a taper angle of about seven degrees from the longitudinal axis of the wedge and the wedge receiving bore. Within variations of design for anchor systems known in the art, the mean taper angle of the wedge receiving bore is typically within twenty minutes of arc (⅓ degree) of the mean taper angle of the wedge used with the particular anchor base.
One aspect of the invention is an anchor system for a tendon. Such an anchor system includes a load transfer device having at least one wedge receiving bore therein. The wedge receiving bore has a tapered interior surface. The anchor system also includes a wedge configured to be affixed to an exterior surface of a tendon. The wedge has a tapered exterior surface configured to cooperate with the tapered interior surface of the wedge receiving bore to laterally compress the wedge against the tendon when the wedge is moved longitudinally into the bore. Taper angle of the wedge and a taper angle of the wedge receiving bore are selected such that longitudinal compressive force exerted by the wedge is substantially evenly longitudinally distributed.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
Generally, the invention includes tendon retaining wedges and/or load transfer devices (such as post tension anchor plates) formed to have particular features as will be explained below in more detail. Some embodiments of wedge segments and/or load transfer devices according to the invention are intended to be used with post-tension anchor systems, and for purposes of illustrating the invention, a post tension anchor base and wedge system will be explained. However, wedges and/or anchor plates according to various aspects of the invention may be used with any other application for a tendon-type load transfer system, including, without limitation, the various applications described in the Background section herein.
An assembled post-tension anchor system and post-tension tendon known in the art prior to the present invention are shown generally in cross section in
The anchor base 12 shown in
As explained above, when using wedges known in the art prior to the present invention, it is believed that one source of the failure of the tendon during axial stress testing is a reduction of the effective external diameter of the tendon and the formation of stress risers resulting from relatively deep penetration of the surface of the tendon (14 in
As explained above, it is currently known to those of ordinary skill in the art that both the exterior surface of the wedge and the interior surface of the wedge receiving bore typically have a taper angle of about seven degrees. The taper angles in various prior art implementations may be as much as ½ degree more or less than the nominal seven degrees. Therefore, it is known in the art that in many cases the taper angles for the wedge and for the wedge receiving bore are between 6½ and 7½ degrees. However, for all wedges and wedge receiving bores known in the art prior to the present invention, the taper angle of the wedge and the wedge receiving bore do not differ from each other by more than about 20 minutes (⅓ degree). An example of the wedge and receiving bore taper angle known in the art prior to the invention of about 7 degrees is shown in
In examples of a wedge and a wedge receiving bore according to one aspect of the invention, the taper angle of the exterior surface of the wedge and the corresponding taper angle of the wedge receiving bore in the anchor base are particularly selected so that lateral compressive force exerted by the wedge against the tendon is substantially evenly longitudinally distributed along the wedge when the wedge is fully engaged with the wedge receiving bore.
In some examples, the taper angle of the exterior surface of the wedge may be between seven and eight degrees, and more preferably about 7½ degrees. The corresponding taper angle of the wedge receiving bore may be about 6 degrees.
In other examples, the taper angle of the exterior surface of the wedge may be eight degrees or more when used with a seven degree tapered wedge receiving bore. It has been determined through testing that good tensile strength test results are obtained when the taper angle of the exterior surface of the wedge exceeds the taper angle of the wedge receiving bore by a minimum of about 1° and by about a maximum of 2°. In the first example, a difference between the wedge receiving bore taper angle and the wedge taper angle is about 1½ degrees. Selecting such a taper angle difference in such range has been found to produce lateral compressive forces that are substantially evenly longitudinally distributed along the length of the anchor wedge 19, as shown in
The foregoing embodiments, as previously explained, are described with respect to post-tension concrete reinforcing systems. It should be understood that other applications for tendon anchoring, such as mine wall and/or roof retention, bridge supports, wall supports, and other tendon retaining systems such as described in the Background section herein may have application for a tendon retaining system according to the invention to improve the tensile strength thereof.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3399434 | Kelly | Sep 1968 | A |
3524228 | Kelly | Aug 1970 | A |
3588045 | Stubbs | Jun 1971 | A |
3605361 | Howlett et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3703748 | Kelly | Nov 1972 | A |
3757390 | Edwards | Sep 1973 | A |
3820832 | Brandestini et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3895879 | Burtelson | Jul 1975 | A |
3912406 | McGrath | Oct 1975 | A |
3937607 | Rodormer | Feb 1976 | A |
4343122 | Wlodkowski et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4586303 | Jartoux et al. | May 1986 | A |
4604003 | Francoeur et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4648147 | Zimmermann et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4662134 | Illgner | May 1987 | A |
4718209 | Hansen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4799307 | Reigstad et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4941303 | Jartoux | Jul 1990 | A |
5082031 | Suhr | Jan 1992 | A |
5086811 | Suhr | Feb 1992 | A |
5259703 | Gillespie | Nov 1993 | A |
5278353 | Buchholz et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5493828 | Rogowsky et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5535561 | Schuyler | Jul 1996 | A |
5630301 | Sieg | May 1997 | A |
5669189 | Logiadis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5755065 | Sorkin | May 1998 | A |
5939003 | Crigler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6017165 | Sorkin | Jan 2000 | A |
6195949 | Schuyler | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234709 | Sorkin | May 2001 | B1 |
6322091 | Lindley | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322281 | Jungwirth et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6381912 | Sorkin | May 2002 | B1 |
6513287 | Sorkin | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6684585 | Campbell | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6718707 | Marshall | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6761002 | Sorkin | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6817148 | Sorkin | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6883280 | Hayes | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7147404 | Spearing et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174685 | Hayes | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7275347 | Hayes | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7360342 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020076274 | Carlsen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20060096196 | Hayes et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117683 | Hayes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179742 | Mathews et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201083 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004033015 | Mar 2005 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090205273 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |