This invention relates to cardiac ablation devices and methods for using the same.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an arrhythmic condition of the heart in which the normal cardiac electrical impulses spread through the atrium in an incoherent manner, preventing the atrium from efficiently delivering blood to the ventricle. It is estimated that over 2.2 million Americans and 4.5 million EU citizens suffer from atrial fibrillation. Annual costs in the U.S. related to AF are approximately $16 billion. There are approximately 300,000 new AF cases each year. Contributors to AF incidence include the aging population, and many conditions including hypertension, cardiomyopathy, structural heart disease, diabetes, sleep apnea and obesity. Approximately 15% of stroke cases are due to clots originating in blood pooling in the atria due to AF. AF is classified into several types, primarily paroxysmal, and chronic, which includes persistent, and permanent with subtypes, depending on the presentation and associated morbidities. First-line treatment of AF is pharmaceutical, either through rate control, rhythm control, anticoagulation, or some combination. Due to the multiple types of AF, and the many agents and protocols used, the overall success of drug treatment cannot be accurately stated; some estimates are that overall drug efficacy is <40%. Additionally, some drug treatments have side effects that reduce quality of life or present risks.
When drug treatment is unsatisfactory, AF can be treated by destruction of the paths through which the erratic electrical impulses are spread. The destruction can be accomplished from either the epicardial or the endocardial surface, and by either mechanical means, such as the Cox Maze surgery in which tissue dissection disrupts those unwanted electrical pathways, or by application of energy to the tissue. Energetic ablation can be performed using radio frequency (RF) energy, microwave energy, ultrasonics, or cryotherapy, among others. The goal of ablation is to create a continuous, fully transmural line of necrosed tissue, which are able to conduct electrical signals across the line, effectively creating an electrical fence. However, today's ablation techniques are complex and have not reached high efficacy, thereby limiting their clinical utility. A particular problem is that clinicians cannot easily determine during the procedure whether the ablation produced is likely to interrupt conduction permanently.
About 20% of ablations are epicardial; this route is chosen when other treatments have failed, and when cardiac surgical procedures are also needed, as epicardial ablation generally requires heart bypass. The remaining 80% are endocardial, performed using a percutaneous catheter inserted into a vein, then into the right atrium, and then via a trans-septal puncture through the septum into the left atrium. The most common ablation techniques attempt to create circumferential ablations around the ostia, the locations where the pulmonary veins (PV) enter the left atrium. This isolates the disorganized signals arising in the veins from the atrium, without inducing stenosis due to pulmonary vein ablations. However, of the approximately 1 million AF patients in the US not successfully treated with drugs, only about 100,000 are treated by ablation annually. More are not treated by ablation due to its difficulty and the wide variation in treatment efficacy. Approximately 40% are repeat ablation procedures.
Endocardial catheter ablation is currently a two to six hour procedure performed by electrophysiologists (EPs). Much of this time is needed for a spot by spot creation of the required circumferential ablations using the ablation tools currently available, along with the time spent to verify conduction block, and follow-up during the procedure to insure that conduction block has been maintained, and when not, reablate specific locations as determined via conduction measurements. Reported long term success rates range from 20-70%. The efficacy decreases as AF progresses. To achieve even these results, approximately 40% of patients require repeat procedures at significant cost to the healthcare system, along with the radiation exposure from imaging and other risks to the patient and to the clinician inherent in these procedures. Market research indicates that both the variations in efficacy and the lengthy duration of the procedure are primarily due to uncertainty on the part of the clinician during the procedure as to whether the ablation lesion is continuous, complete, permanent, and transmural.
Present commercial minimally invasive catheter ablators consist of numerous single point ablation catheters, as well as a number of more recent devices, including a balloon catheter utilizing a laser energy source, a balloon catheter utilizing cryothermal energy, a multi-electrode ablator, utilizing RF energy and various robotic systems to maneuver catheters through the vascular system into the heart.
The two balloon ablators are applied in a similar manner, as they are inserted via a catheter and placed at the ostium, or intersection of the pulmonary veins with the atrial wall. Their placement limits their application to only electrically isolating unwanted signals around the pulmonary veins from the rest of the heart. Electrophysiologists, who perform the ablation procedures have also indicated that follow-up spots still need to be ablated, and there have been reports of injuries to surrounding tissue such as the phrenic and vagus nerves, and stenosis of the veins. Since they occlude blood flow through the vein, the balloons need to be adequately stiff to oppose the pressure from the blood flow. This is desirable in order to maintain their position and contact with the target tissue during the ablation cycle, otherwise they are less likely to achieve a continuous abaltion.
The multi-electrode array ablator, mounted on a Nitinol frame, can be used to map, ablate, and verify the ablation line by measuring conduction block, across the ablation line, around the pulmonary veins or in other target areas. Although this device can use its Nitinol frame to more readily conform to the target surface, while using a low level of applied force, which can provide enhanced contact to maximize ablation energy transfer, electrophysiologists have reported that this requires additional discrete point ablations to be performed. This increases procedure time and reduces the likelihood of generating a continuous, fully transmural ablation. To maintain contact between the array and target tissue requires the electrophysiologist to continue to apply force during the ablation cycle, similar to point and balloon ablators. Because each ablator electrode in the array resides in a continuous ring, it may not satisfactorily conform to the target tissue's topography.
There are a number of robotic systems in development and already commercialized that augment the clinician's ability to maneuver the catheter to the selected target in the vascular system, including chambers in the heart. One such robot system allows a magnet to direct a catheter to a target and hold it against the target. It is designed to maneuver and hold point ablators. Point ablators take significant procedure time and do not necessarily generate continuous lesion lines to block unwanted electrical pathways. In addition the robots are very expensive.
However, present methods and technology do not provide features for locating and fixing in place the ablative element(s) that are physically separate from the mechanism for performing the ablation. This lack of separation limits the capability of devices based on these prior inventions to accurately locate the tissue volume to be ablated with respect to the pulmonary vein target at a location which minimizes the possibility of pulmonary stenosis, while also adjusting the contact of the ablative element(s) to provide intimate and accurate contact of the ablative element(s) with the atrial tissue and thereby form an ablated volume that fully encloses the ostium of the pulmonary vein.
In addition, the balloons and multi-electrode array are constructed and arranged to apply a continuous ablation line. These technologies are limited because they must be in continuous contact throughout the ablator-tissue contact range. They have problems maintaining that contact during the ablation cycle.
Also, prior systems employ primarily only point ablators to generate lesion lines beyond the pulmonary vein isolation technique, which creates a circumferential abvlation around the pulmonary veins. However, this is a difficult procedure, which requires a high level of skill, exposes the clinicians and patient to radiation during imaging, extends procedure durations and reduces efficacy.
The present invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing an apparatus and method for use in performing endocardial ablations to electrically isolate the pulmonary vein(s) from the surrounding atrial tissue. An illustrative embodiment of the apparatus is in the form of a catheter with an external sheath, retractable to various positions as known to those skilled in the art. In addition, a second embodiment provides the capability to perform linear ablation lines as well. According to various embodiments herein, the catheter is introduced into the pulmonary vein with a Guide catheter. An option is to provide steering within the main catheter, and to operate free of a guide catheter.
The catheter, at its distal end, is assembled with an anchoring device beneath the sheath so that the anchor expands upon initial refraction of the internal sheath. When the catheter tip has been placed within a pulmonary vein, and the sheath initially retracted, the anchoring device expands and contacts the interior wall of the pulmonary vein, and exerts a radial force on the wall, anchoring and centering the catheter with respect to the lumen of the pulmonary vein at that location. By also pulling the anchoring device in a proximal direction, (towards the user), the anchor will be too large to pull through the vein's exit into the atrium, thereby enhancing the anchoring device. Several specific embodiments of the anchoring device are presented below.
The catheter also includes, at a separate location proximal to that of the anchoring device, an ablation device. After the catheter has been anchored in the vein, an additional retraction of the external sheath allows the expansion of the ablation device. A variety of ablation device designs and implementations can be employed in according with various embodiments herein.
After deployment of the ablation device, a secondary manipulation of the catheter can be employed to force the ablation device components into intimate contact with the atrial tissue, prior to the initiation of the ablation step. Examples of actuators to carry out this illustrative secondary manipulation of the catheter are detailed in the drawings and specifications below.
Both the anchoring device and the ablation device can also employ additional electrical conductors, operatively connected to that catheter control system, and typically provided separate from the ablation control or the anchoring device. The additional conductors are placed in contact with the tissue generally remote from (away from) the ablated tissue volume, by the expansion of the anchoring and ablation devices, respectively. The additional conductors can be used, while the anchoring and ablation devices remain in place, to assess the presence or absence of conduction block across the volume of tissue ablated during or after the ablation process. This step prevents having to estimate where to place the feedback sensors with respect to the ablation volume. The use of such conductors to assess the presence or absence of conduction block through the ablated tissue volume is well known to those skilled in the art.
In order to optimize radio-frequency ablation, a bipolar circuit is typically desirable, so as to direct and focus the ablation energy in an efficient and safe manner. There are a number of options to create a bipolar conduction path. A typical method includes a conductive pad placed under the patient, but according to this method the energy will be disbursed in many directions. One alternate return circuit can be included on, or adjacent to the ablator, such that the return circuit is be on the same side of the ablator with respect to the atrial wall. The return circuit typically defines a greater distance from the ablator than the thickness of the target tissue in order to maximize the likelihood that a full thickness ablation is achieved. Another option can be to place a return electrode on the epicardial (outside) surface of the heart. The option of placing the return electrode across from the ablator, is often desirable in terms of the electrical characteristics of the system, as the energy is significantly focused and applied in a highly efficient manner. An optional return circuit can include an electrode on a minimally invasive device to be inserted into and mounted on or located near (proximate to) the wall of the esophagus, adjacent to the heart. Since this can be applied with standard minimally invasive devices, and yields a relatively short electrical path, it can be a desirable method of applying ablation energy. Illustratively, the electrode can reside in the lumen of the esophagus, or can be attached to the wall of the esophagus, using an anchoring system similar to that proposed for the anchor in the pulmonary vein.
As a further feature of the apparatus and method, during catheter ablation procedures, Transesophageal Echocardiographic (TEE) Ultrasound is often used as a guidance tool for placing the ablator. The TEE instrument can also include an electrode for the return ablation energy circuit as described above. A minimally invasive device inserted into the esophagus can also contain one or more magnets, in which opposite-pole magnets can be included in the ablator device. Thus the TEE device can include magnets to enhance, or provide, the prime anchoring technique for holding the ablator against the target.
The invention description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:
An apparatus and method for performing cardiac ablation employs a catheter and various anchoring and ablation techniques, according to illustrative embodiments described herein. The various arrangements and types of apparatus components are shown in the illustrative embodiments of
A. Catheter Including Balloon Anchor and Compass Ablator
Reference is now made to
The catheter 103 includes a protective outer sheath with lumen 102. Proximal to the anchor 101 is a point ablation catheter 104 emanating radially at an angle from the midcath 103 to contact the atrial wall 107 around the pulmonary vein 106. This is the catheter that is used during the ablation phase. A pacing catheter 108 is disposed proximal to the point ablation catheter 104. The pacing catheter 108 is arranged to contact the atrial wall tissue 107 radially outside the ablation line. By emitting an electrical signal from the pacing catheter 108, the electrical contact on the anchor detects the pacing signal if the ablation line is incomplete. The term “ablator” as used herein refers broadly to the structure assembled proximal to the anchor and onto the catheter, having a circumferential configuration so as to surround the tissue surrounding the pulmonary wall. The ablator can be any appropriate shape and use any of a variety of modalities (or combination of modalities, such as resistance heating, RF, ultrasound, etc.) to perform ablation of internal tissue. Moreover, the ablator configuration can be constructed and arranged to define any shape that is suitable for use in conjunction with the pulmonary vein opening, as described in greater detail hereinbelow.
The anchor 101 provides stabilization to the ablator 100 for this and other embodiments described herein. The stabilization effect provided allows physicians and/or other clinicians to utilize a standard “off-the-shelf” point ablator while maintaining the various advantages described herein. The anchor also allows a user to have more control of the point ablator contact because the catheter is anchored within a desired portion of the heart and ablation can be targeted more specifically. The anchor moreover allows for additional linear ablation lesion lines such as a roof line (shown in
B. General Catheter Structure
Reference is made to
C. Catheter Including Umbrella Anchor and Umbrella Ablator
An embodiment employing an illustrative umbrella anchor and umbrella ablator is shown in
The anchor is opened to an expansion of the pulmonary vein based on the radial force of the anchor against the pulmonary vein wall. The force measurement can be achieved illustratively by one or more micro force sensors 303 mounted on the struts of the anchor. By way of example, one such force sensor can be a microstrain gauge. This form of gauge directly measures the radial expansion force. A second indirect optional force measurement can be achieved by measuring the tensile force on the cinch cable (as shown in
The umbrella anchor 201 is shown as an open-end, stent-like device. It can have an electrical feedback circuit (not shown) contacting the tissue. A single force sensor (not shown) can be included, for example in the umbrella ring 313, to detect and send axial compression force between the umbrella 302 and anchor 201. Alternatively, force sensors located on each strut, not shown, but as part of a feedback circuit can be included to detect force at each ablator electrode.
The umbrella anchor 301 of
D. Catheter Including Umbrella Anchor and Pinwheel Ablator
Reference is now made to
The umbrella anchor 301 allows blood to flow therethrough during ablation and provides a structural surface for electrical contact for a feedback circuit. The discrete ablator struts 502 of the pinwheel ablator 501 allow for each strut to have a distinct electrode to conform to the rough topography of the atrial surface 107. A micro force sensor 504 mounted on each electrode pad can insure that each electrode is in sufficient contact, or that the particular electrode is not used in the ablation process. In addition, impedance and/or current measurement through each ablation electrode can provide a significant source of additional feedback to determine if each electrode is in sufficient contact to allow it to be used in the ablation. The discrete ablator electrodes for each ablator strut 502 are also readily stored within the catheter when in the stored position.
E. Catheter Including Mushroom Anchor and Umbrella Ablator
Reference is now made to
The mushroom anchor 601 allows blood to flow therethrough during the ablation phase, and any time proximate thereto. The mushroom anchor is secured by rings or other appropriate structures to provide sufficient rigidity, while allowing the distal end of the anchor to be moved proximally, or the proximal end to be slid/advanced distally, thereby providing a controlled radial expansion of the anchor against the pulmonary vein wall. Force sensors, such as microstrain gauges (not shown), located on at least one strut, and/or optionally mounted on pairs of diametrically opposing struts can be included.
H. Catheter Including Balloon Anchor and Balloon Ablator
Reference is now made to
I. Catheter Including Umbrella Anchor and Umbrella Ablator
Referring now to
J. Catheter Including a Combination Mushroom Balloon Anchor and Mushroom Balloon Ablator
Reference is now made to
K. Catheter Including a Combination Mushroom Balloon Anchor and Mushroom Balloon Ablator Having Separated Segments
L. Catheter Including a Mushroom Balloon Anchor Separated from a Balloon Anchor
Referring to
M. Catheter Including an Umbrella Anchor and Annular Balloon Ablator
Reference is now made to
O. Magnetic Anchor as Part of a Transesophageal Device
Reference is now made to
P. Medical Treatment Procedure for Cardial Ablation
Reference is made to
Q. Operational Embodiment
An operational embodiment employing an umbrella ablator and a mushroom anchor is shown in
Once the anchor is determined to be in place, the ablator umbrella 402 (or point ablator or balloon ablator of other embodiments) expands until it reaches a predetermined position. The umbrella ablator (or balloon ablator described herein) is advanced until it sufficiently compresses against the target atrial tissue, as shown in full contact in
Referring to
In another embodiment, with the anchor seated within a Pulmonary Vein (PV), the umbrella ablator can be moved/withdrawn proximally, away from the PV, and towards the trans-septal puncture. It may or may not be pulled back into its outer sheath. When the umbrella ablator is positioned in a desired location, between the PV at the distal end and the trans-septal puncture at the proximal end, one electrode is extended distally (arrow D2O) and steered towards the target tissue. Once the electrode ablator is adjacent to the target, the Electrophysiologist (EP) rotates the elongated pad segment of the electrode so it is oriented in the path of the line to be ablated. Then the EP pushes and compresses the electrode pad against the tissue and ablates (arrow D30). The force sensor and current/impedance feedback provides information about the lesion creation.
Once the electrode 401 ablates a first line segment, the electrode 401 (and/or the outer sheath 102) is moved parallel with and just beyond one end of the already ablated line segment. Once properly aligned the next segment is ablated, overlapping it with the prior segment. This procedure is repeated until the entire length or segment of the line is completed or achieves the desired predetermined pattern and/or electrical measurement.
Once a Pulmonary Vein is isolated and the neighboring segment of the linear lesion is completed, the umbrella ablator 402 is withdrawn back into its outer sheath (such withdrawal can have occurred at a previous time), the anchor 601 is collapsed and retracted into its inner sheath, the anchor 601 and guide catheter 103 is withdrawn from the PV and inserted into the next PV. The above-described insertion process and subsequent withdraw is then repeated until the overall medical treatment is complete.
With reference to
To create the line to the mitral annulus 1430 from the roof line (not shown), the upper portion of the line is made with the anchor seated in one of the upper pulmonary veins and the other portion with the anchor seated in one of the right lower pulmonary vein (RIPV) 106b and left lower pulmonary vein (LIPV) 106c.
One or more electrodes of the umbrella ablator can be steerable, in accordance with the illustrative embodiments. In an embodiment, if only one electrode is steerable, then the catheter can be rotated to properly position that electrode with respect to the target location. If there is sufficient space, two electrodes can be provided with steerability, and are constructed illustratively in an arrangement in which each electrode is diametrically opposed within the catheter.
The arrangement of
Another option for performing ablations, although not shown, is to remove the umbrella ablator and insert a standard point ablator. This can be an RF or cryoablator, depending on the preference of the EP. It is inserted along the guide catheter part way into the left atrium. At a desired position the EP steers the point ablator laterally (radially outward) from the axis of the catheter towards the target tissue. Once the target tissue is reached the EP ablates. When complete the EP moves the point ablator a small distance to overlap the prior ablation point. Notably, the anchored catheter 103 acts as a platform from which the point ablator can be maneuvered.
With a point ablator a procedural option is to perform all the PVI ablations, and thereby the anchor is inserted into and removed from each PV, after each PV is isolated. After PVI is complete for all the PVs, the umbrella ablator is removed, then the point ablator is inserted. The process of inserting and removing the anchor into each PV is repeated for the point ablator and subsequent creation of the neighboring linear lesions of each PV. A second procedural option is to remove the umbrella ablator after each PV is isolated, then insert the point ablator and perform the linear lesion ablation while the anchor remains seated in the PV, after which the anchor is removed and then inserted into the next PV.
In addition, to insure that the catheter is as secure of a platform as appropriate from which to push the single electrode, or point ablator catheter against the atrial wall, in order to optimize contact, it is desirable to maintain the anchor and umbrella ablator in the pulmonary vein. With those components in place the EP pulls the catheter proximally as tight as possible without disruption to the pulmonary vein in order to keep the catheter sufficiently tight. In case this if insufficient, a restraint is needed to stop the catheter from sagging inside the left atrium.
Reference is made to
R. System for Performing Cardiac Ablation
Reference is now made to
It should now be apparent that the various anchoring and ablating catheters described herein are generally applicable in performing cardiac ablations and similar related procedures. Any of the anchoring devices can be combined with any ablator devices as described herein without departing from the scope and purpose of the teachings herein.
The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Each of the various embodiments described above may be combined with other described embodiments in order to provide multiple features. Furthermore, while the foregoing describes a number of separate embodiments of the apparatus and method of the present invention, what has been described herein is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. For example, various combinations of anchoring devices and/or ablator devices have been shown and are described together. Any combination of anchor and ablator devices can be employed in accordance with the teachings herein. In addition, directional and locational terms such as “top”, “bottom”, “front”, “back”, and “side” should be taken as relative conventions only, and are not absolute. By way of example, in further embodiments, the deployment of the umbrella anchor or balloon anchor can utilize a novel catheter that is dedicated to the placement of the anchor in a manner similar to techniques in which practitioners place a conventional stent. In such embodiment, subsequent t placement of the anchor, the practitioner is free to insert a commercially available ablator of any appropriate configuration. Illustratively, a replacement coupling mechanism can be operatively connected to the distal tip of the conventional ablation catheter. This mechanism and features on the anchor can allow the distal tip of the conventional ablator to be guided into a latching mechanism. When the illustrative ablations are complete, then the resulting latched catheter can withdraw the anchor for removal. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. nonprovisional application Ser. No. 13/101,270, filed May 5, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/331,537, filed May 5, 2010, entitled ANCHORED RING CARDIAC ABLATION CATHETER, the entire disclosure of each of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5125928 | Parins et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5562722 | Racz et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5876399 | Chia et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5906591 | Dario et al. | May 1999 | A |
5971983 | Lesh | Oct 1999 | A |
6063081 | Mulier et al. | May 2000 | A |
6200311 | Danek et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6254599 | Lesh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6305378 | Lesh | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6416511 | Lesh et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6463332 | Aldrich | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471697 | Lesh | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6517477 | Wendlandt | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527769 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6529756 | Phan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6595989 | Schaer | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6652517 | Hall et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6752805 | Maguire et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764486 | Natale | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770070 | Balbierz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6771533 | Witcraft et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6855144 | Lesh | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6872205 | Lesh et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893438 | Hall et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893442 | Whayne | May 2005 | B2 |
6955173 | Lesh | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964660 | Maguire et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979331 | Hintringer et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008418 | Hall et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7063698 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066880 | Wendlandt | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7156816 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7655005 | Bhola | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7753906 | Esposito | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020065515 | Falwell | May 2002 | A1 |
20020107478 | Wendlandt | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020156499 | Konya et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173774 | Olsen | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030060821 | Hall et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065250 | Chiel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069578 | Hall et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069587 | Schorgl et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078574 | Hall | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093072 | Friedman | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120270 | Acker | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030167056 | Jahns et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040034347 | Hall et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040236320 | Protsenko et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267337 | Hayzelden | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050154376 | Riviere et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182392 | Brucker et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222557 | Baxter et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235996 | Hooser et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240116 | Saadat et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050273095 | Taimisto | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025756 | Francischelli et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060084960 | Mester et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089635 | Young et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106298 | Ahmed et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106375 | Werneth | May 2006 | A1 |
20060200124 | Whayne et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206113 | Whayne et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235381 | Whayne et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247607 | Cornelius | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070083193 | Werneth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083194 | Kunis | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070249999 | Sklar et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265609 | Thapliyal et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265610 | Thapliyal et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080027423 | Choi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080249518 | Warnking et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281322 | Sherman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294158 | Pappone et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090221996 | Lesh | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090312755 | Thapliyal et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100049099 | Thapliyal et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20150342675 | Highsmith | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005046461 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Couple.” Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. Feb. 3, 2016. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 11778338.1, dated Oct. 22, 2013, 5 pages. |
Patronik, et al., “A Miniature Cable-Driven Robot for Crawling on the Heart,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology, May 2, 2005, pp. 5771-5774, Publisher: National Science Foundation, Published in Shanghai, China. |
Patronik, et al., “Crawling on the Heart: A Mobile Robotic Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Interventions,” Sep. 1, 2004, Publisher: Springer-Verlag 2004, Published in Pittsburgh, PA. |
Patronik, et al., “Development of a Tethered Epicardial Crawler for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Therapies,” Apr. 1, 2004, pp. 239-240, Publisher: IEEE, Published in Pittsburg, PA. |
Razjouyan, et al., “Enhancing the Locomotion of an In Vivo Robot for Cardiac Surgery,”Apr. 1, 2006, pp. 97-98, Published in Pittsburg, PA. |
Riviere, et al., “Prototype Epicardial Crawling Device for Intrapericardial Intervention on the Beating Heart,” The Heart Surgery Forum, Sep. 16, 2004, pp. E639-E643, vol. 7, No. 6, Publisher: Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC, Published in Pittsburgh, PA. |
International Preliminary report on Patentability for Application PCTUS2011035348 dated Nov. 15, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130060248 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61331537 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13101270 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13666615 | US |