The current invention generally relates to heart valve repair and replacement devices and methods. More specifically, the current invention is directed to anchoring devices and methods for prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings configured for rapid implantation and methods for implanting same.
The heart is a hollow muscular organ of a somewhat conical form; it lies between the lungs in the middle mediastinum and is enclosed in the pericardium. The heart rests obliquely in the chest behind the body of the sternum and adjoining parts of the rib cartilages, and typically projects farther into the left than into the right half of the thoracic cavity so that about one-third is situated on the right and two-thirds on the left of the median plane. The heart is subdivided by septa into right and left halves, and a constriction subdivides each half of the organ into two cavities, the upper cavity being called the atrium, the lower the ventricle. The heart therefore consists of four chambers; the right and left atria, and right and left ventricles, with one-way flow valves between respective atria and ventricles and at the outlet from the ventricles.
The atrioventricular heart valves (i.e., the tricuspid and mitral valves) are located in the center of the heart between the atria and the ventricles of the heart, and play important roles in maintaining forward flow of blood. Atrioventricular valve dysfunction is also commonly known as “regurgitation” and affects well over one million people globally. The mitral and tricuspid valves are defined by fibrous rings of collagen, each called an annulus, which forms a part of the fibrous skeleton of the heart. The annulus provides peripheral attachments for the two cusps or leaflets of the mitral valve (called the anterior and posterior cusps) and the three cusps or leaflets of the tricuspid valve. The free edges of the leaflets connect to chordae tendinea from more than one papillary muscle. In a healthy heart, these muscles and their tendinous chords support the mitral and tricuspid valves, allowing the leaflets to resist the high pressure developed during contractions (pumping) of the left and right ventricles.
Although valve regurgitation often occurs due to the dilatation of the valve annulus, mitral and tricuspid valve function and competency frequently depend on the fine geometric and functional integrity of the valve's supporting structures, such as, for example, the associated subvalvular apparatus. The subvalvular apparatus of these heart valves include, among other things, the associated chordae tendinea and papillary muscles.
As seen in
The tricuspid valve also has subvalvular structures, but is a tricuspid (i.e., three cusp or leaflet) structure as opposed to the bicuspid structure of the mitral valve. Some mitral and tricuspid valve replacement procedures involve the removal of these subvalvular structures. However, the subvalvular structures may play a role in maintaining the proper shape of the ventricles, and thus their preservation may be desirable, depending on the particular circumstances.
When the left ventricle contracts after filling with blood from the left atrium, the walls of the ventricle move inward and release some of the tension from the papillary muscle and chords. The blood pushed up against the under-surface of the mitral leaflets causes them to rise toward the annulus plane of the mitral valve. As they progress toward the annulus, the leading edges of the anterior and posterior leaflet come together forming a seal and closing the valve. In the healthy heart, leaflet coaptation occurs near the plane of the mitral annulus. The blood continues to be pressurized in the left ventricle until it is ejected into the aorta. Contraction of the papillary muscles is simultaneous with the contraction of the ventricle and serves to keep healthy valve leaflets tightly shut at peak contraction pressures exerted by the ventricle.
The native heart valves (such as the aortic, pulmonary, tricuspid, and mitral valves) serve critical functions in assuring the forward flow of an adequate supply of blood through the cardiovascular system. These heart valves can be rendered less effective by congenital, inflammatory, infectious conditions, or other disease. Such damage to the valves can result in serious cardiovascular compromise. Heart valve disease is a widespread condition in which one or more of the valves of the heart fails to function properly. Diseased heart valves may be categorized as either stenotic, wherein the valve does not open sufficiently to allow adequate forward flow of blood through the valve, and/or incompetent, wherein the valve does not close completely, causing excessive backward flow of blood or regurgitation through the valve when the leaflets are supposed to coapt together to prevent regurgitation. Valve disease can be severely debilitating and even fatal if left untreated. For many years the definitive treatment for such disorders was the surgical repair or replacement of the valve during, for example, open heart surgery.
Various surgical techniques may be used to repair a diseased or damaged valve, which is typically used on minimally calcified valves. Surgical repair of the native valve is commonly conducted using so-called annuloplasty rings. Examples of annuloplasty rings, including methods of use for repairing native valves, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,055,861, filed Apr. 9, 1976 and entitled “Support for a Natural Heart Valve”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,041,130, filed Nov. 30, 1989 and entitled “Flexible Annuloplasty Ring and Holder”; U.S. Pat. No. 6,558,416, filed Mar. 6, 2001 and entitled “Annuloplasty Ring Delivery Method”; and in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/019,506, filed Feb. 2, 2011 and entitled “Devices and Methods for Treating a Heart,” the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Sometimes actual replacement of the heart valve is the preferred option. Heart valve replacement may be indicated when there is a narrowing of a native heart valve, commonly referred to as stenosis, or when the native valve leaks or regurgitates, such as when the leaflets are calcified. Due to aortic stenosis and other heart valve diseases, thousands of patients undergo surgery each year wherein the defective native heart valve is replaced by a prosthetic valve, either bioprosthetic or mechanical. Prosthetic cardiac valves have been used for many years to treat cardiac valvular disorders.
When the valve is replaced, surgical implantation of the prosthetic valve typically requires an open-chest surgery during which the heart is stopped and patient placed on cardiopulmonary bypass (a so-called “heart-lung machine”). In one common surgical procedure, the diseased native valve leaflets are excised and a prosthetic valve is sutured to the surrounding tissue at the valve annulus. Because of the trauma associated with the procedure and the attendant duration of extracorporeal blood circulation, some patients do not survive the surgical procedure or die shortly thereafter. It is well known that the risk to the patient increases with the amount of time required on extracorporeal circulation. Due to these risks, a substantial number of patients with defective valves are deemed inoperable because their condition is too frail to withstand the procedure. By some estimates, about 30 to 50% of the subjects suffering from aortic stenosis who are older than 80 years cannot be operated on for aortic valve replacement.
Because of the drawbacks associated with conventional open-heart surgery, percutaneous and minimally-invasive surgical approaches are garnering intense attention. In one technique, a prosthetic valve is configured to be implanted in a much less invasive procedure by way of catheterization. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,411,552 to Andersen et al. describes a collapsible valve percutaneously introduced in a compressed state through a catheter and expanded in the desired position by balloon inflation. Although these remote implantation techniques have shown great promise for treating certain patients, replacing a valve via surgical intervention is still the preferred treatment procedure. One hurdle to the acceptance of remote implantation is resistance from doctors who are understandably anxious about converting from an effective, if imperfect, regimen to a novel approach that promises great outcomes but is relatively foreign. In conjunction with the understandable caution exercised by surgeons in switching to new techniques of heart valve replacement, regulatory bodies around the world are moving slowly as well. Numerous successful clinical trials and follow-up studies are in process, but much more experience with these new technologies will be required before they are completely accepted.
In some situations, replacement of the native heart valve with a prosthetic heart valve may be the desired treatment. There are approximately 60,000 mitral valve replacements (MVR) each year and it is estimated that another 60,000 patients should receive a MVR due to increased risk of operation and age. The large majority of these replacements are accomplished through open-heart surgery, where a prosthetic heart valve is surgically implanted with the patient on pulmonary bypass. Such surgically implanted prosthetic valves have a long and proven record, with high success rates and clinical improvements noted after such valve replacement. However, it can be desirable to keep the time that the patient spends on pulmonary bypass to a minimum.
Surgeons relate that one of the most difficult tasks when attempting valve repair or replacement, either in open heart surgeries or minimally invasive heart valve implantations (e.g., through small incisions) is tying the suture knots that hold the valve or repair ring in position. A typical prosthetic mitral valve implant utilizes 12-24 sutures (commonly about 15) distributed evenly around and manually tied on one side of the sewing ring. The implantation process can be very time consuming and difficult to perform, particularly through minimal size incisions due to the numerous pairs of sutures that need to be precisely placed in the annulus and the knots that are typically used to secure the sutures when the valve is parachuted into place. Similarly, in a valve repair procedure numerous pairs of sutures must be precisely placed around the native annulus to attach the repair device. Minimizing or even eliminating the need to use suture (and/or to tie suture knots) for attachment of prosthetic valves or repair devices would greatly decrease the time of the procedure and/or facilitate the use of smaller incisions, thus reducing infection risk, reducing the need for blood transfusions, reducing the time spent on bypass, and allowing more rapid recovery.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved device and associated method of use wherein a prosthetic valve or valve repair device can be implanted in a more efficient procedure that reduces the time required on extracorporeal circulation and/or catheterization. It is desirable that such a device and method be capable of helping patients with defective valves that are deemed inoperable because their condition is too frail to withstand a lengthy conventional surgical procedure. The present invention addresses these needs and others.
A valve repair or replacement device for implantation at a native valve annulus and method of implanting the same is disclosed. The device may be a prosthetic valve, annuloplasty ring, or other device for implantation at the native valve annulus. The device has a central portion with one or more anchors extending therefrom from fixed ends secured to the central portion, with the anchors terminating at free ends. The anchors run substantially parallel to the circumference of the central portion in a curved fashion, forming leaflet-receiving slots between the anchors and central portion. The device is configured to be positioned at the native valve annulus, and then rotated (twisted) to place the anchors underneath the resident valve leaflets, with the resident valve leaflets sliding into the leaflet-receiving slots until the device is fully seated. The leaflets are then held within the slots, which may include inward pressure from the anchor arms that press the leaflets between the anchor arms and the central portion of the device.
The anchors may extend from the central portion, and may include a cross-section configured to have a different stiffness in-plane than the stiffness out-of-plane. There may be one, two, three, four, or more anchors extending from the central portion. The anchors may extend from the central portion at different positions around the circumference thereof, and may be generally equidistantly positioned around the circumference. The anchors may be formed of metal or polymer or other suitable material, and the device may include a cloth covering. The device may include radiopaque markers and other structures to enhance visibility during implantation. For example, an anchor member may have one or more radiopaque markers positioned thereon, such as at the tip of the free end and/or at the fixed end.
The assembly may form a prosthetic valve formed by support frame and valve leaflets, with the support frame having a central portion and one or more curved anchors extending therefrom to form at least one slot between the anchor(s) and central portion, with the at least one slot sized to slidingly receive a proximal portion of a heart valve leaflet therein. The anchors and slots may be preferably sized and configured to engage resident leaflets. For example, at least one slot may have a width of similar size to the thickness of a native valve leaflet.
A device for treating a heart according to an embodiment of the invention comprises a prosthetic valve having a support frame and a valve portion. The valve portion may include a plurality of leaflets secured to the support frame and configured to coapt to permit blood flow in a first direction through the valve portion and to prevent blood flow in a second direction through the valve portion, wherein the first direction is opposite to the second direction, wherein the support frame comprises one or more attachment structures configured to be attached, and/or to otherwise facilitate attachment of the device, to tissue at or adjacent an annulus of a native heart valve.
The prosthetic valve may be configured for surgical implantation, either via traditional open-heart or minimally invasive techniques, and/or via catheterization. The support frame may have supplemental attachment structures (i.e., in addition to the anchors) for securing the prosthetic valve at a desired location at a native heart valve annulus. For example, the support frame may comprise a sewing ring configured to be sutured to tissue of the annulus of the native heart valve, and/or may include other attachment structures configured to secure the support frame at the valve annulus using no (or minimal) suture, such as an expandable stent structure, clamps, skirts, or other elements configured to engage tissue of, or adjacent to, the native annulus in order to secure the prosthetic valve at the desired position. Examples of sutureless securement devices and methods for use with the current invention are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/821,628, filed Jun. 23, 2010 and entitled “Unitary Quick-Connect Prosthetic Heart Valve and Deployment System and Methods,” and also in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/167,639, filed Jun. 23, 2011 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Rapidly Deploying Surgical Heart Valves,” the entire contents of each of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
An embodiment of the invention is a prosthetic heart valve assembly for replacing a resident heart valve, comprising a prosthetic valve and anchors extending therefrom. The prosthetic valve may have a support frame and a valve portion. The valve portion is a one-way valve, which may have a plurality of leaflets secured to the support frame about a central axis of the prosthetic valve to an internal flow lumen and configured to coapt to permit blood flow in a first direction through the internal flow lumen and to prevent blood flow in a second direction through the internal flow lumen. The prosthetic valve has an exterior surface, which may be configured to engage tissue of a heart. At least one anchor member extends from the support frame, the anchor member comprising a proximal fixed end secured to the support frame and a distal free end. The anchor member extends at least partially around the circumference of the prosthetic valve (radially about the central axis thereof) and substantially parallel to the prosthetic valve exterior to define a leaflet-receiving slot configured to slidingly receive a leaflet of a heart valve. The leaflet-receiving slot extends in continuous, unbroken fashion from the proximal fixed end of the anchor member to the distal free end of the anchor member. The slot is sized and configured to slidingly receive and hold a desired valve leaflet of a resident valve, where a resident valve is a native heart valve or a previously-implanted prosthetic valve. Depending on the particular application, the slot may have a length of 0.25 to 3.5 inches and a width of 0.005 to 0.25 inches.
The prosthetic valve may be substantially tubular, with the exterior surface forming a substantially continuously curved surface about the circumference thereof, with the anchor member forming a curve which parallels the curved surface of the exterior surface of the valve.
A valve assembly according to the invention may form a prosthetic mitral valve assembly with first and second anchor members defining first and second leaflet-receiving slots and having first and second fixed ends and first and second free ends, respectively. Each slot extends in continuous, unbroken fashion from the anchor fixed end to the anchor free end. The anchors can be sized and positioned to engage the anterior and posterior leaflets of a native mitral valve, so that the slots are sized to receive these leaflets. The first and second anchors may have fixed ends which are spaced at least 90 degrees apart, and more specifically about 100 to 140 degrees apart, and more specifically 120 degrees apart, about the circumference of the device, with the anchor extending in the same rotational direction (e.g., clockwise) about the circumference of the device. The first anchor member may pass around the circumference of the prosthetic valve through an angle of at least 90 degrees, with the second anchor passing around the circumference of the prosthetic valve through an angle of at least 120 degrees.
An assembly according to the invention may form an annuloplasty ring having a support ring having a circumference and comprising a central opening defining a flow axis through which fluid may flow, a covering around the support ring, the covering comprising an outer surface, and a first anchor member extending from the support frame. The first anchor may have a first proximal fixed end secured to the support ring and a first distal free end, wherein the first anchor member extends around at least partially around a circumference of the support ring and substantially parallel to outer surface of the covering to define a first leaflet-receiving slot configured to receive a leaflet of a heart valve. The first leaflet-receiving slot may preferably extend in continuous, unbroken fashion from the first proximal fixed end to the first distal free end. The first anchor member may extend around the circumference of the prosthetic valve through an angle of at least 90 degrees.
An annuloplasty ring may further include additional anchor members. For example, it may include a second anchor member having a second proximal fixed end secured to the support ring and a second distal free end, wherein the second anchor member extends at least partially around the circumference of the annuloplasty ring and substantially parallel to the exterior thereof to define a second leaflet-receiving slot configured to receive a second leaflet of a heart valve. The second leaflet-receiving slot may extend in continuous, unbroken fashion from the second proximal fixed end to the second distal free end. The second proximal fixed end may be circumferentially displaced from the first anchor proximal fixed end by an angle of at least 90 degrees, by an angle of between 100 and 140 degrees, or by an angle of about 120 degrees. The first anchor may extends around the circumference of the annuloplasty ring through an angle of between 90 and 120 degrees, and the second anchor may extend around the circumference of the annuloplasty ring through an angle of between 150 and 240 degrees. The support ring may be substantially circular, substantially D-shaped, and/or substantially saddle-shaped.
Methods of implanting a device (e.g., annuloplasty ring, prosthetic valve, etc.) at a native valve annulus can include providing a device comprising a central portion, a first curved anchor extending from a first fixed end secured to the central portion and passing generally parallel to an outer surface thereof to a first free end of the first curved anchor to form a first leaflet-receiving slot, a second curved anchor extending from a second fixed end secured to the central portion and passing generally parallel to an outer surface thereof to a second free end to form a second leaflet-receiving slot, wherein the central portion defines a flow orifice with a flow axis therethrough. The method may include positioning the device with the first curved anchor and second curved anchor adjacent the native valve annulus, with the fluid flow axis of the device generally parallel to a fluid flow path through the native valve annulus, and with the first free end positioned adjacent a first commissure of a resident valve at the native valve annulus; placing the first free end underneath a first resident valve leaflet; rotating the device substantially about the fluid flow axis thereof to advance the first free end underneath the first resident valve leaflet and thereby slidingly advancing the first resident valve leaflet into the first leaflet-receiving slot; monitoring the position of the second free end with respect to a second commissure of the resident valve; and stopping rotation of the device about the fluid flow axis once the second free end is adjacent the second commissure of the resident valve. Once the second free end is adjacent the second commissure, the surgeon or other user can place the second free end underneath a second resident valve leaflet; recommencing rotating the device substantially about the fluid flow axis thereof to advance the second free end underneath the second resident valve leaflet and thereby slidingly advancing the second resident valve leaflet into the second leaflet-receiving slot while also further advancing the first free end underneath the first resident valve leaflet and further slidingly advancing the first resident valve leaflet into the first leaflet-receiving slot; and stop rotation of the device when the first resident valve leaflet is slidingly advanced into the first leaflet-receiving slot at a position adjacent the first fixed end, whereby deployment of the device is completed.
The native valve annulus may be a mitral valve annulus or a tricuspid valve annulus. If the native annulus is a tricuspid annulus, the device may include three anchors spaced around the perimeter of the device, with each anchor configured to slidingly receive one of the three valve leaflets of the resident tricuspid valve. Where the native valve annulus is a mitral valve annulus with intact native mitral valve leaflets, the first commissure may be a PC commissure of a native mitral valve, the first leaflet may be an anterior leaflet of the native mitral valve, the second commissure may be an AC commissure of the native mitral valve, and the second leaflet may be a posterior leaflet of the native mitral valve.
Methods of implanting the device include open heart surgery, including surgery where prior to positioning the device adjacent the native valve annulus, the surgeon or other user temporarily ceases heart function of the heart and places the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass. After completing deployment of the device, the heart function of the heart may be resumed and the patient then removed from cardiopulmonary bypass.
Methods of the invention include providing a valve repair or replacement device. The device may comprise an annuloplasty ring with one or more anchors extending therefrom, or may comprise a prosthetic valve with a support frame and leaflets with the leaflets secured to the support frame to form a one-way valve structure and with one or more anchors extending from the support frame. Each anchor has a proximal end secured to the support frame and a free distal end, with a slot defined between the support frame and the anchor. The anchor is positioned adjacent a commissure point of the native valve, and the free end is positioned underneath a native leaflet of the valve (and below the native heart valve annulus). The device (e.g., annuloplasty ring or prosthetic heart valve) is rotated about its central axis to advance the anchor underneath the native leaflet, so that the native leaflet is slidingly advanced into the slot. Advancement and securement can be performed in an open-heart or minimally-invasive procedure. The central portion (e.g., ring portion or support frame) may comprise a sewing ring, and securing the support frame to the tissue of the native heart valve annulus may include suturing the sewing ring to tissue of the native heart valve annulus. The device may comprise a stent, with the stent being expanded into contact with native tissue before, during, or after the anchor(s) are rotated underneath the resident leaflets). The native valve annulus may be of any heart valve, with particular application to mitral and tricuspid valves.
After the central portion is secured to the native valve annulus, the surgeon or other user may add one or more stitches or other securing device/methods to secure the device to the local tissue in order to prevent the device from rotating back out of its deployed position. In such a deployment, the anchors hold the device to prevent movement up, down, sideways, etc., while the sutures or other tissue connectors serve to prevent the device from rotating such that the leaflets rotatingly slide out of the slots to be released from the anchors.
The method may include temporarily ceasing heart function of the heart and placing the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass, performing various steps (such as advancement and securing of the prosthetic valve to the native annulus), and then resuming heart function of the heart and removing the patient from cardiopulmonary bypass. Deployment of the device may occur with the patient on bypass, or may occur with the patient's heart beating (e.g., after the patient is removed from bypass, with heart function restarted) and with the surgeon or other user monitoring the heart function and/or ventricular shape as the length adjustments are made.
Methods of the invention may include, prior to securing the support frame to the tissue of the native heart valve annulus, removing some native valve leaflets and/or subvalvular structure (e.g., chordae tendinea) from the heart.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
The invention is an anchoring device, including prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings and other devices using that anchoring device, for securement within a patient, such as in a native heart valve annulus in a human heart. The device has particular applicability to devices to be secured at the annulus of a valve (such as the mitral and tricuspid valves) which has subvalvular structures such as chordae tendinea. A mitral valve and its subvalvular structure are depicted in
The configurations of various elements could vary at different positions on the assembly. For example, the cross-sectional shape of the anchors and/or central ring could be other than rectangular, and/or could vary along their lengths. For example, as depicted in
Various modifications could be made to promote ease of use. For example, an anchor device 80 portion could have a central ring 82 and anchors 84a, 84p having rounded or otherwise blunted ends, such as the spherical-tipped ends 86a, 86p depicted in
An anchoring device according to the invention could use various materials, and could include coverings, etc. For example, the structure of the anchoring device (formed of, e.g., metal) could include a cloth covering. Such coverings could serve multiple purposes. For example, covering the device with a biocompatible covering which encourages tissue ingrowth, such as PTFE cloth, would encourage the patient's native tissue to attach to the device over time, possibly reducing tissue irritation and potential damage from metal-on-tissue contact. The tissue ingrowth could also assist to improve the anchoring of the device, by providing mechanical stability and thereby reduce the chance of migration and embolization. The covering, especially a cloth covering, could also provide the ability for a surgeon or other user to use sutures to further secure the device in place. A flexible/resilient covering, such as cloth, could also provide a surface which would “give way” (e.g., be compressed) to permit the leaflets to be slid into the slots, but would also push back (i.e., rebound) into the slots to engage the leaflets once in place and assist in holding the device in place. A covering could also be used to hold a lubricious coating, such as glycerol, which could facilitate the threading of the anchors between the leaflets and the ventricle.
Coverings, if present, could be configured to bioresorb or otherwise degrade over time, or could be formed from material(s) that will not biodegrade/bioresorb over time. Examples of such materials for potential use with the invention include PTFEs, polyesters, nylons, and others.
The structural support portions of devices according to the invention could be formed from metals or non-metals, including stainless steel, nitinol, titanium, CoCr, alloys, polymeric materials, and other biocompatible materials. The structural support portions (i.e., the central ring and anchors) may preferably be formed from materials which are substantially rigid with minimal elasticity, and which are not easily plastically deformed. Devices according to the invention may include radiopaque markers and other structures to enhance visibility during implantation. For example, an anchor member may have one or more radiopaque markers positioned thereon, such as at the tip of the free end and/or at the fixed end. Such radiopaque markers may be formed from highly-radiopaque materials (e.g., gold, platinum) mounted on, embedded in, formed with, or otherwise secured to the structural support and/or other portions of the device.
A further embodiment of the invention is depicted in
Although the embodiments depicted above generally had substantially circular configurations, which may be preferred in some applications such as prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings, the invention is not so limited. For example, non-circular configurations could also be used, such as the generally D-shaped configuration depicted in
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/297,187, filed Mar. 8, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,849,752, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/482,529, filed Apr. 7, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,238,489, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/797,163, filed Jul. 12, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,737,401, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/675,801, filed Nov. 13, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,078,747, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/578,758, filed Dec. 21, 2011, the entire disclosures all of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3143742 | Cromie | Aug 1964 | A |
3320972 | High et al. | May 1967 | A |
3371352 | Siposs et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3409013 | Berry | Nov 1968 | A |
3546710 | Shumakov et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3574865 | Hamaker | Apr 1971 | A |
3628535 | Ostrowsky et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3657744 | Ersek | Apr 1972 | A |
3686740 | Shiley | Aug 1972 | A |
3755823 | Hancock | Sep 1973 | A |
3839741 | Haller | Oct 1974 | A |
4035849 | Angell et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4078468 | Civitello | Mar 1978 | A |
4079468 | Liotta et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4084268 | Ionescu et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4106129 | Carpentier et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4172295 | Batten | Oct 1979 | A |
4217665 | Bex et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4218782 | Rygg | Aug 1980 | A |
4259753 | Liotta et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
RE30912 | Hancock | Apr 1982 | E |
4340091 | Skelton et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4343048 | Ross et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4364126 | Rosen et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4388735 | Ionescu et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4441216 | Ionescu et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4451936 | Carpentier et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4470157 | Love | Sep 1984 | A |
4490859 | Black et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4501030 | Lane | Feb 1985 | A |
4506394 | Bedard | Mar 1985 | A |
4535483 | Klawitter et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4605407 | Black et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4626255 | Reichart et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4629459 | Ionescu et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4680031 | Alonso | Jul 1987 | A |
4687483 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4702250 | Ovil et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4705516 | Barone et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4725274 | Lane et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4731074 | Rousseau et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4778461 | Pietsch et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4790843 | Carpentier et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4851000 | Gupta | Jul 1989 | A |
4865600 | Carpentier et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4888009 | Lederman et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4914097 | Oda et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4960424 | Grooters | Oct 1990 | A |
4993428 | Arms | Feb 1991 | A |
5010892 | Colvin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5032128 | Alonso | Jul 1991 | A |
5037434 | Lane | Aug 1991 | A |
5041130 | Cosgrove et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5059177 | Towne et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5147391 | Lane | Sep 1992 | A |
5163955 | Love et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5258023 | Reger | Nov 1993 | A |
5290300 | Cosgrove et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316016 | Adams et al. | May 1994 | A |
5326370 | Love et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5326371 | Love et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
5360444 | Kusuhara | Nov 1994 | A |
5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
5376112 | Duran | Dec 1994 | A |
5396887 | Imran | Mar 1995 | A |
5397351 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411522 | Trott | May 1995 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413676 | Nguyen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423887 | Love et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425741 | Lemp et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431676 | Dubrul et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5449384 | Johnson | Sep 1995 | A |
5449385 | Religa et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5469868 | Reger | Nov 1995 | A |
5476510 | Eberhardt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5488789 | Religa et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5489297 | Duran | Feb 1996 | A |
5489298 | Love et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500016 | Fisher | Mar 1996 | A |
5522884 | Wright | Jun 1996 | A |
5531785 | Love et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5533515 | Coller et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549665 | Vesely et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554185 | Block et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562729 | Purdy et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571215 | Sterman et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573007 | Bobo, Sr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578076 | Krueger et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584803 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5618307 | Donlon et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626607 | Malecki et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628789 | Vanney et al. | May 1997 | A |
5693090 | Unsworth et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695503 | Krueger et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713952 | Vanney et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716370 | Williamson, IV et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728064 | Burns et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728151 | Garrison et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735894 | Krueger et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752522 | Murphy | May 1998 | A |
5755782 | Love et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766240 | Johnson | Jun 1998 | A |
5776187 | Krueger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776188 | Shepherd et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800527 | Jansen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814097 | Sterman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814098 | Hinnenkamp et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824064 | Taheri | Oct 1998 | A |
5824068 | Bugge | Oct 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848969 | Panescu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855563 | Kaplan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865801 | Houser | Feb 1999 | A |
5885228 | Rosenman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891160 | Williamson, IV et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895420 | Mirsch, II et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902308 | Murphy | May 1999 | A |
5904695 | Krueger | May 1999 | A |
5908450 | Gross et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919147 | Jain | Jul 1999 | A |
5921934 | Teo | Jul 1999 | A |
5921935 | Hickey | Jul 1999 | A |
5924984 | Rao | Jul 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5972004 | Williamson, IV et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984959 | Robertson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984973 | Girard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010531 | Donlon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6042607 | Williamson, IV et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059827 | Fenton, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6066160 | Colvin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074418 | Buchanan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081737 | Shah | Jun 2000 | A |
6083179 | Oredsson | Jul 2000 | A |
6099475 | Seward et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106550 | Magovern et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110200 | Hinnenkamp | Aug 2000 | A |
6117091 | Young et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6162233 | Williamson, IV et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176877 | Buchanan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197054 | Hamblin, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217611 | Klostermeyer | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231561 | Frazier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241765 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6283127 | Sterman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287339 | Vazquez et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290674 | Roue et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312447 | Grimes | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312465 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328727 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350282 | Eberhardt | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6371983 | Lane | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402780 | Williamson, IV et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6419696 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432134 | Anson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440164 | Di Matteo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458100 | Roue et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468305 | Otte | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6527979 | Constantz et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530952 | Vesely | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6558416 | Cosgrove et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6558429 | Taylor | May 2003 | B2 |
6569196 | Vesely | May 2003 | B1 |
6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585766 | Huynh et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6682559 | Myers et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685739 | DiMatteo et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702825 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712804 | Roue et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719789 | Cox | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6730121 | Ortiz et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733525 | Yang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746472 | Frazier et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764508 | Roehe et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6767362 | Schreck | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6786925 | Schoon et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6790229 | Berreklouw | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6790230 | Beyersdorf et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797002 | Spence et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805711 | Quijano et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6846325 | Liddicoat | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6893459 | Macoviak | May 2005 | B1 |
6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6936067 | Buchanan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939365 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6964682 | Nguyen-Thien-Nhon et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974476 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978176 | Lattouf | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7011681 | Vesely | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018404 | Holmberg et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018408 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025780 | Gabbay | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037334 | Hlavka et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7070616 | Majercak et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077861 | Spence | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081131 | Thornton | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7097659 | Woolfson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101395 | Tremulis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7101396 | Artof et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7125421 | Tremulis et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147663 | Berg et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153324 | Case et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160320 | Duran | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172625 | Shu et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186265 | Sharkawy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7195641 | Palmaz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201771 | Lane | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201772 | Schwammenthal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238200 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252682 | Seguin | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261732 | Justino | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7300463 | Liddicoat | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311730 | Gabbay | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7377941 | Rhee et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
RE40377 | Williamson, IV et al. | Jun 2008 | E |
7422603 | Lane | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7429269 | Schwammenthal et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442204 | Schwammenthal et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445630 | Lashinski et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7445631 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468073 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470285 | Nugent et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7510575 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513909 | Lane et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524330 | Berreklouw | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534261 | Friedman | May 2009 | B2 |
7556647 | Drews et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7569072 | Berg et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578843 | Shu | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7585321 | Cribier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591848 | Allen | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597711 | Drews et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611535 | Woolfson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618446 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618447 | Case et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622276 | Cunanan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625403 | Krivoruchko | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641687 | Chinn et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658763 | Stobie | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7682390 | Seguin | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704277 | Zakay et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708775 | Rowe et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727276 | Machiraju | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737060 | Strickler et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740655 | Birdsall | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7785366 | Maurer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799069 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7822414 | Bender et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7862610 | Quintessenza | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7887583 | Macoviak | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896913 | Damm et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947072 | Yang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7951195 | Antonsson et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7951197 | Lane et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967857 | Lane | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972377 | Lane | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7989157 | Cunanan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8062355 | Figulla et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8167932 | Bourang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8246675 | Zegdi | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8246678 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8308798 | Pintor et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323335 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348998 | Pintor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8353953 | Giannetti et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377115 | Thompson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8398708 | Meiri et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8449605 | Lichtenstein et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449606 | Eliasen et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460173 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8500798 | Rowe et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8657872 | Seguin | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663322 | Keranen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672998 | Lichtenstein et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8734507 | Keranen | May 2014 | B2 |
8784483 | Navia | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8821569 | Gurskis et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9078747 | Conklin | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095434 | Rowe | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119718 | Keranen | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9125738 | Figulla et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9237886 | Seguin et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9364326 | Yaron | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9463268 | Spence | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9474599 | Keranen | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9622863 | Karapetian et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20010021872 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010041914 | Frazier et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020026238 | Lane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058995 | Stevens | May 2002 | A1 |
20020123802 | Snyders | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138138 | Yang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151970 | Garrison et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188348 | DiMatteo et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198594 | Schreck | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014104 | Cribier | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023300 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023303 | Palmaz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040792 | Gabbay | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055495 | Pease et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030109924 | Cribier | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114913 | Spenser et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130729 | Paniagua et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149478 | Figulla et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167089 | Lane | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030225420 | Wardle | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236568 | Hojeibane et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019374 | Hojeibane et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034411 | Quijano et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040106976 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122514 | Fogarty et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122516 | Fogarty et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127982 | Machold et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167573 | Williamson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186563 | Iobbi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186565 | Schreck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040206363 | McCarthy et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210304 | Seguin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210307 | Khairkhahan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225355 | Stevens | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236411 | Sarac et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260390 | Sarac et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010285 | Lambrecht et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027348 | Case et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033398 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043760 | Fogarty et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043790 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060029 | Le et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065594 | DiMatteo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065614 | Stinson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075584 | Cali | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075713 | Biancucci et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075717 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075718 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075719 | Bergheim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075720 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075724 | Svanidze et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080454 | Drews et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096738 | Cali et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119735 | Spence et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137682 | Justino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137686 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137687 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137688 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137689 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137690 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137691 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137692 | Haug et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137694 | Haug et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137695 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151970 | DeGeorge et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165477 | Anduiza et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165479 | Drews et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182483 | Osborne et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182486 | Gabbay | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192665 | Spenser et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203616 | Cribier | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203617 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222674 | Paine | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234546 | Nugent et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240259 | Sisken et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240263 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251252 | Stobie | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283231 | Haug et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025857 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052867 | Revuelta et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058872 | Salahieh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074484 | Huber | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085060 | Campbell | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122634 | Ino et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122692 | Gilad et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149360 | Schwammenthal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161249 | Realyvasquez et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195183 | Navia et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195184 | Lane et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195185 | Lane et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195186 | Drews et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229708 | Powell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235508 | Lane et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241745 | Solem | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253191 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259135 | Navia et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259136 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265056 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271172 | Tehrani | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271175 | Woolfson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287717 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010876 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010877 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016285 | Lane et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016286 | Herrmann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016288 | Gurskis et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043435 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070078509 | Lotfy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078510 | Ryan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100440 | Figulla et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129794 | Realyvasquez | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142907 | Moaddeb et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150053 | Gurskis et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156233 | Kapadia et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162103 | Case et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162111 | Fukamachi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203575 | Forster et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203576 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225801 | Drews et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239269 | Dolan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260305 | Drews et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265701 | Gurskis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270944 | Bergheim et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282436 | Pinchuk | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021546 | Patz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033542 | Antonsson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033543 | Gurskis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082161 | Woo | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080119875 | Ino et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080208330 | Keranen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080281411 | Berreklouw | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090036903 | Ino et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043381 | Macoviak et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090192602 | Kuehn | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192603 | Kuehn | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192604 | Gloss | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192605 | Gloss et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192606 | Gloss et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090319037 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100076548 | Konno | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145440 | Keranen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161036 | Pintor et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100204785 | Alkhatib | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100249894 | Oba et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249908 | Chau et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100292784 | Giannetti et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312333 | Navia et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318184 | Spence | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331972 | Pintor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110137410 | Hacohen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110147251 | Hodshon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110190879 | Bobo et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224785 | Hacohen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120059458 | Buchbinder et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065729 | Pintor et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120087842 | Kristiansson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120094406 | Patel et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095116 | Kishi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120150288 | Hodshon et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165930 | Gifford, III et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120283820 | Tseng et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130175468 | Uehara | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140074299 | Endou et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140172070 | Seguin | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140379074 | Spence et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150173897 | Raanani et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230921 | Chau et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150282931 | Brunnett et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150335428 | Keranen | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150374493 | Yaron et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160074165 | Spence et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160095705 | Keranen et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160184095 | Spence et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199177 | Spence et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160256276 | Yaron | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170007399 | Keranen | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007402 | Zerkowski et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170217385 | Rinkleff et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2356656 | Jan 2000 | CN |
19532846 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19907646 | Aug 2000 | DE |
0125393 | Nov 1984 | EP |
0143246 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0592410 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0850607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
2620125 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2726018 | May 2014 | EP |
2806829 | Dec 2014 | EP |
9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9213502 | Aug 1992 | WO |
9742871 | Nov 1997 | WO |
9806329 | Feb 1998 | WO |
9911201 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9915112 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9951169 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0032105 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0040176 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0060995 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0154624 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0247575 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02076347 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2005084595 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006011127 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006086135 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2005102015 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007067942 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2009155561 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010121076 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2013110722 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013114214 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2015023579 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015023862 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015127264 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015198125 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016038017 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016040881 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016130820 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Krakow, “3F Therapeutics, Inc. Announces the First Clinical Implantation of the 3F Enable Aortic Heart Valve.TM., a Patented, Sutureless Implantation, Replacement Heart Valve Intended to Save Valuable Surgery Time and Reduce Time RelatedComplications . . . ” Healthcare Sales & Marketing Network News Feed, Jan. 18, 2005, pp. 1-2. |
Sadowski, Jerzy; Kapelak, Boguslaw; Bartus, Krzysztof, “Sutureless Heart Valve Implantation—A Case Study,” Touch Briefings, 2005, pp. 48-50. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210077259 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61578758 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13675801 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 14797163 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16297187 | Mar 2019 | US |
Child | 17105373 | US | |
Parent | 15482529 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 16297187 | US | |
Parent | 14797163 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15482529 | US |