In industries concerned with actions taken within earth formations, it is often necessary to anchor tools needed for a plethora of possible operations. Anchors come in many different forms and constructions and each has its strengths and weaknesses and hence each type tends to be favored for a relatively specific class of applications. While existing anchors work well for their intended purpose and are generally reliable, the costs of operational inconsistencies in downhole applications are significant. The art is therefore consistently seeking and interested in alternative constructions that improve reliability.
An anchor system includes an anchoring device and at least one of a restriction indicator and a load isolation device in operable communication with the anchoring device.
A method for setting of an anchoring system includes protecting an outer gage diameter of an anchoring device with a restriction indicator having a gage diameter greater than any gage diameter of the anchoring device; and configuring the restriction indicator to hold a selected amount of string weight in the event that the system contacts a restriction in a borehole in which the system is being run.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
Referring to
Referring to
Restriction indicator 14 presents a relatively small gage surface 20 that is exposed to and might encounter a restriction contact. In addition, because of the short axial length of the surface 20 and the configuration of the frustocone 22, if a restriction is encountered, it is a relatively easy affair to pull the system 10 back uphole and out of the restriction. Further, the restriction indicator provides a warning signal to an operator in that the restriction indicator 14 is releasably affixed by a release member 26 to a lower cone 28 which itself is releasably affixed by a another release member 56 (shear screw(s), parting ring, body lock ring, collet, etc.) to a shear sleeve 30. In one embodiment, the release member 26 is a shear ring, but it will be understood that other release members, such as shear screw(s), parting ring, body lock ring, collet, etc., could be substituted. The release member 26 provides a signal to an operator indicative of a restriction by holding some selected amount of weight and then releasing causing a slack off in weight on the derrick (not shown) at surface and then a return of the weight, or in other words a spike (except in the negative direction with respect to load). The amplitude of the signal is dictated by the release value of the release member 26 and can be adjusted during manufacture of the system 10.
Referring now to the load isolation device 46, this feature provides the function of ensuring that the anchor system 10 sets only at a selected location such as the bottom of a borehole in which the anchor is to be used or at a landing profile (discussed hereunder as alternative embodiment) intended to cause the actuation. It ensures this by presenting a significantly lesser gage diameter than other components of the system 10. This helps in the function of the system 10 in that it predisposes the actuation of the system 10 at the selected location such as the bottom of the borehole or at a landing profile, as is intended. Because the collet is of significantly smaller gage diameter, the likelihood of being actuated by a restriction is consequently smaller. The collet 46 is releasably secured by a collet release member 48 (shear screw(s), parting ring, body lock ring, collet, etc) to the shear sleeve 30 to prevent actuations caused merely by drag of the collet 46 along borehole structures during running. It is to be appreciated that in one embodiment the collet 46 extends downhole (to the right in the drawing) of the shear sleeve 30 by enough distance to allow the collet actuation shoulder 50 to make contact with and actuate a lower cone actuation shoulder 52. Upon contact of the collet with the bottom of the hole (not shown), in the embodiment of
Collet fingers 54 function to help prevent unintended actuation through the restriction indicator 14, pursuant to a restriction, by transferring from the lower cone 28 to the shear sleeve 30 the load occasioned by contact between shoulder 32 and shoulder 34, which is otherwise resisted only by setting release member 56. The fingers 54 include enlarged ends 58 to interact with the shear sleeve 30 at groove 62 and lower cone 28 through undercut 60 therein, in which the ends 58 are positioned. In this configuration, unintended actuation due to the system encountering a restriction with restriction indicator 14 requires release of the release member 26, movement of the restriction indicator 14 to load shoulders 32 and 34. At this point, however, the load being transferred between load shoulders 32 and 34 will be transmitted axially along the lower cone, and will then load into the enlarged ends 58 of the collet fingers (through load shoulder B). The enlarged ends 58 of the collet fingers will then be placed into compression against load shoulder A. While this load is applied, the setting of the anchor 10 is prevented (see
In another embodiment, illustrated in
Referring now to
While one or more embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.
This application claims the benefit of an earlier filing date from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/159,663 filed Mar. 12, 2009, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3991826 | Baugh | Nov 1976 | A |
4059150 | Manderscheid | Nov 1977 | A |
4359090 | Luke | Nov 1982 | A |
4754814 | Jordan, Jr. | Jul 1988 | A |
5350013 | Jani et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
6123148 | Oneal | Sep 2000 | A |
20020066577 | Dewey et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020121380 | Doane et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050230108 | Mackenzie et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1201875 | May 2002 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; PCT/US2010/026998; Korean Intellectual Property Office, Mailed Sep. 27, 2010. |
Brown, W.H. et al. “Drilling, Completion, Isolation and Thru Tubing Re-entry of Multilaterals in Hard Open Hole Formations,” [Abstract Only], Offshore Technology Conference, Apr. 30-May 3, 2001, Houston, Texas. |
Dreesen, Donald S. et al, “Openhold Packer for High-Temperature Service ina 500 degrees F Precambrian Wellbore,” [Abstract Only] SPE Production Engineering, vol. 3, No. 3, Aug. 1988, pp. 351-360. |
“Hanger Packers,” [online]; [retrieved May 20, 2010]; retrieved from the Internet: http://www.bakerhughes.com/products-and-services/completions-and-productions/well-completions/liner-systems-wellbore-isolation/hanger-packers. |
Pettitt, Roland A. et al. “Sidetracking Experiences in Hot Granitic Wellbores,” Conference: Geothermal Resources Council annual meeting, Houston, TX, USA, Oct. 25, 1981. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100230116 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61159663 | Mar 2009 | US |