The invention relates to a boom arm for mobile concrete pumps and to a mobile concrete pump.
Mobile concrete pumps usually have a boom arm, arranged on a movable substructure, with a delivery pipe running along it through which the flowable concrete can be pumped. The boom arm here comprises multiple booms which can be pivoted relative to one another about pivot axes in each case transversely to the longitudinal direction of the boom arm.
It is consequently possible in principle to fold together the boom in such a way that, together with the movable substructure, it does not exceed a predetermined maximum height. The predetermined maximum height can here correspond, for example, to customary clearance heights for road traffic and hence the mobile concrete pump can also travel under bridges and through tunnels.
In order to be able to fold together the boom so that it is as small as possible and hence achieve the highest possible number of boom arms, it is known that individual boom arms are configured so that they are elbowed. As a result, when folded together about the described pivot axes, the boom arms can lie partially next to one another such that the set of folded-together boom arms has a lower height than a corresponding set of folded-down boom arms where none of the boom arms are elbowed.
Elbowed boom arms manufactured from steel are known from the prior art. In the case of these boom arms, a plurality of steel profiles having the same cross-section are welded to one another in such a way that the desired elbow results, wherein when elbowed two steel profiles are arranged essentially parallel to each other and are connected to each other by a third steel profile which extends at an angle to them.
In order to absorb the forces acting on the boom arm during operation and in order to be able to produce the elbow by means of welding, the steel profile must have a certain wall thickness. An elbowed boom arm according to the prior art consequently has a not inconsiderable weight.
In particular because the number of possible boom arms of a mobile concrete pump—and hence often the maximum height that can be obtained—is often limited by the maximum permissible total weight of the concrete pump or alternatively by its maximum permissible axle load, the high weight of the individual boom arms and in particular the elbowed boom arms according to the prior art is a disadvantage.
The object of the invention is to provide an elbowed boom arm and a mobile concrete pump in which the disadvantages from the prior art no longer pertain or only to a reduced extent.
This object is achieved by a boom arm as claimed in the main claim and a mobile concrete pump as claimed in the subordinate claim 12. Advantageous developments are the subject of the dependent claims.
The invention accordingly relates to a boom arm, in particular for the placing boom of a concrete pump, having a first and second end, wherein at least one elbowed section, in which the main bending loads which occur during proper use act as torsional loads, is provided between the first and the second end of the boom arm, and the boom arm is made from a fiber composite material, wherein beyond the elbowed region the height of the boom arm in cross-section is greater than the width of the boom arm in cross-section and in the elbowed region the width of the boom arm in cross-section is greater than or equal to the height of the boom arm in cross-section.
The invention furthermore relates to a concrete pump with a placing boom arranged on a substructure and comprising at least two boom arms, wherein at least one boom arm is designed according to the invention.
Some terms used in connection with the invention are first explained:
The terms “width” and “height” of the boom arm refer to the dimensions of the boom arm as are defined for calculating the geometrical moment of inertia about a pivot axis of the boom arm. A pivot axis of the boom arm is here an axis about which the boom arm can be pivoted directly with respect to an adjacent boom arm, relative to the latter.
In the case of a “continuous fiber-reinforced fiber composite material”, the fibers or continuous fibers have a length which is generally greater than 50 mm. The fiber length is in particular such that they can no longer be processed in an extrusion method. Instead, corresponding continuous fibers are generally available as a flat raw material or roving which can then be processed to produce a fiber composite material. “Roving” here designates a bundle, strand, or multi-filament yarn consisting of continuous fibers arranged essentially in parallel. A “flat raw material” can be, for example, a woven fabric, nonwoven fabric, knitted fabric, or plaited fabric.
Owing to the fact that the boom arm according to the invention is produced from fiber composite material, a saving in weight can in principle be achieved compared with a comparable steel boom arm. By virtue of the significantly lower specific weight of fiber composite material, a significant reduction in weight compared with the steel construction can be achieved, even when a slightly larger wall thickness may have to be chosen in order to obtain a comparable stiffness.
Although a corresponding change of material may in principle be possible in particular in the case of non-elbowed boom arms while maintaining the shape, the invention is based on the recognition that, at least in the case of elbowed boom arms, it is not readily possible to correspondingly replace the material easily or at least does not afford any greater saving in weight. This is explained inter alia by the fact that, in the case of elbowed boom arms made of fiber composite material, the wall thickness cannot be significantly reduced compared with a steel design without the stiffness of the boom arm being reduced in the region of the elbow to a value which is not acceptable for use in concrete pumps.
The invention has recognized that, in the region of the elbow, some of the normal loads which act on the boom arm, which are originally bending loads, act as torsional loads. Based on this recognition, the invention provides that this particular form of loading in the region of the elbow is counteracted not by a greater wall thickness but instead by a shape which is adapted to the loading. Whilst the height of the boom arm in cross-section beyond the elbowed region is greater than the width of the boom arm in cross-section—as a result of which in particular bending loads can be absorbed well—in the elbowed region the width of the boom arm in cross-section is greater than or equal to the height of the boom arm in cross-section. As a result of the adaptation of the cross-section according to the invention, a sufficient stiffness can often be readily obtained also in the region of the elbow without there being any need to increase the wall thickness.
It follows directly from the described connection between the bending load of the boom arm as a whole and the resulting torsional load in the region of the elbow that the boom arm is elbowed in a plane perpendicular to the bending load. Only in this case do the problematic torsional loads occur. In particular, the boom arm can be elbowed in a plane which extends parallel to at least one of the pivot axes about which the boom arm can in each case be pivoted relative to an adjacent boom arm. In the case of a corresponding elbow, it is possible, as is known from the prior art, to lay boom arms side by side when a boom is folded together.
It is instead preferred if the wall thickness in the region of the elbow is smaller or essentially the same as the wall thickness beyond the elbow.
The height of the boom arm in cross-section in the region of the elbow is preferably the same as the height of the boom arm in cross-section beyond the elbow, wherein this height, for reasons of stiffness, often corresponds to the maximum available structural height for the boom arm. Because the height is the same over the whole length of the boom arm, it is ensured that the bending loads acting on the boom arm are absorbed uniformly over its whole length.
The latter also applies if the height of the boom arm tapers from one end to the other end and the height at one end is therefore greater than at the other end. In this case, it is preferred if the height of the boom arm in cross-section tapers uniformly over the region of the elbow. It is in particular intended to dispense with a stepwise modification of the height.
It is preferred if the transition between the cross-section of the boom arm beyond the elbowed region and the cross-section of the boom arm in the elbowed region is a smooth one such that no additional notch effect occurs as a result of the transition. By virtue of a corresponding transition, additional loads are therefore avoided on the fiber composite material which could occur in principle owing to the unfavorable shape of the boom arm.
It is preferred if the cross-section of the boom arm in the elbowed region is based on an essentially octagonal base with a p4 symmetry, wherein the edges which form the axes of symmetry are preferably larger than the other edges and/or the edges which run in the direction of the width of the cross-section are longer than the edges which run in the direction of the height of the cross-section. By virtue of a corresponding shape, the bending and torsional loads which occur in the elbowed region can be readily absorbed.
The cross-section of the boom arm beyond the elbowed region is preferably based on an essentially octagonal base with a p4 symmetry, wherein the edges which form the axes of symmetry are preferably larger than the other edges and/or the edges which run in the direction of the height of the cross-section are longer than the edges which run in the direction of the width of the cross-section. The cross-section is optimized because the bending loads dominate in the region beyond the elbow.
It is preferred if the cross-section of at least some of the edges of the boom arm is curved convexly outward, it being possible for this to apply both to the region of the elbow and to the region beyond the latter. The torsional stiffness of the boom arm can be increased by a corresponding partially convex shape.
It is preferred if the corners in the cross-section of the boom arm are rounded. Stress peaks can be avoided or at least reduced by correspondingly rounded corners.
The boom arm preferably has at least one through opening as an articulation point, wherein the opposite regions of the outer surfaces of the boom arm, into which one of the through openings opens, are each configured so that they are parallel to each other. Because the outer surfaces are arranged parallel to each other in the region of a corresponding through opening through which, for example, a hinge bolt can be guided, the attachment of the boom arm according to the invention to other components such as, for example, a further boom arm is facilitated.
The boom arm is preferably made from endless fiber-reinforced fiber composite material and can be formed from a fibrous nonwoven fabric, a fibrous woven fabric, a fibrous plaited fabric, or a combination thereof. In particular in the case of a fibrous nonwoven fabric, it is possible to place the individual fibers or rovings in an optimized fashion in a shape for the boom arm. It is also possible to use specially produced nonwoven preforms where the individual fibers are fastened, for example by being sewn, on a woven substrate in the desired process.
It is also possible for the boom arm to be produced from prefabricated mats by lamination. The fibers can here be arranged differently. An essentially quasi isotropic arrangement of ±0°/+45°/±90°/−45° or ±0°/+30°/+60°/±90°/−60°/−30° is thus possible. The layers can here be laminated individually or in the form of a prefabricated multi-layer nonwoven fabric. It is also possible to use a unidirectional nonwoven fabric which is laid in a shape for the boom arm which corresponds to the loads which are to be expected.
Suitable methods are known from the prior art for introducing the matrix during or after the laying of the fibers. The fibers can thus be positioned in a wet form (i.e. impregnated with the matrix material), dry form (with subsequent introduction of the matrix material), or in the form of prepregs (fibers impregnated with thermosetting matrix material). A resin, preferably epoxy resin, can be used in particular as the matrix material.
It can also be provided that a core material is provided at least in some regions of the boom arm between two layers of fiber composite material to form a sandwich structure. The core material can be made, for example, from balsa wood or foam.
Reference is made to the above embodiments for an explanation of the concrete pump according to the invention.
The invention is now described by way of example with the aid of an advantageous embodiment with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
The mobile concrete pump 1 with a placing boom 2 shown in
Two of the boom arms 5 of the concrete pump 1 from
The elbowed boom arm 5 in
As shown in
As can be seen directly in
The boom arm 5 is curved convexly outward at the edges 15, 15′ of the boom arm 5 both in the region of the elbow 12 (cf
It is moreover shown in
The boom arm 5 is manufactured in one piece from continuous fiber-reinforced fiber composite material, wherein the boom arm 5 is laminated from prefabricated mats using known methods. Over the whole length of the boom arm 5, the number of the mats for creating the structure is here constant, viewed over the cross-section. Consequently, the cross-sectional area also remains constant over the whole length of the boom arm 5. However, because the cross-section of the boom arm 5 in the region of the elbow 12 (cf
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2017 208 031.0 | May 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/062109 | 5/9/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/206703 | 11/15/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3412761 | Verrell | Nov 1968 | A |
3685543 | Schwing | Aug 1972 | A |
3893480 | Dunbar | Jul 1975 | A |
4171597 | Lester | Oct 1979 | A |
4262696 | Oury | Apr 1981 | A |
5238716 | Adachi | Aug 1993 | A |
6586084 | Paschke | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6719009 | Bissen | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6786233 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
8708171 | Schmidt | Apr 2014 | B2 |
10662609 | Hallale | May 2020 | B2 |
10697148 | Hallale | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10806105 | Murphy | Oct 2020 | B2 |
11447967 | Mors | Sep 2022 | B2 |
20020117219 | Anderson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040069356 | Lehnhardt | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040108003 | Schwing | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20100230371 | Pirri | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110220228 | Maini | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130020274 | Munuswamy | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130078072 | Yelistratov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20150090850 | Maini | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150275532 | Fügel | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170152668 | Rau et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170254101 | Segschneider | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180162701 | Henikl | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190316368 | Akkoc | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200080325 | Häfner | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20210047849 | Edler | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102191862 | Sep 2011 | CN |
103332610 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103352572 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103332610 | Mar 2016 | CN |
H06313325 | Nov 1994 | JP |
2005112514 | Apr 2005 | JP |
20030048361 | Jun 2003 | KR |
2014019887 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2016023758 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office Communication from Examining Division for Application No. 18725450.3-1005 dated Nov. 10, 2020; 4 pgs. |
“Mechanics of Materials”; Engineering Mechanics Course, vol. Three; Jan. 14, 2021; Zhilun et al.; Publication date: Mar. 31, 1953; 15 pgs. |
Chinese Search Report for Application No. 2018800312368 filed May 9, 2018; dated: Jan. 14, 2021; 2 pgs. |
International Search Report for International application No. PCT/EP2018/062109; dated Aug. 23, 2018; 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200199897 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |