N/A
N/A
Animal control systems are known in which a transmitter generates a coded signal that is radiated by a wire loop antenna which is buried a few inches underground and which defines an area in which the animal, typically a dog, is to be contained or from which the animal is to be restricted. A receiver mounted on a collar placed around the neck of the animal includes one or more electrodes which are in physical contact with the skin of the animal. As the animal wearing the receiver approaches the wire loop antenna, the receiver detects the radiated signal, and if the received signal meets one or more qualifying standards, a stimulus is applied to the animal. The stimulus may be in the form of an audible alert and/or an electric shock administered to the animal through the electrodes. Examples of such systems are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,465,687, 5,353,744, 6,360,698 and 6,367,435, all assigned to the Assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention provides a receiver for an animal control system, such as the system described above, having a correction monitor which indicates for some extended period of time that the animal has attempted to challenge the system, as determined by the occurrence of one or more correction events within a specified period of time. A correction event occurs when a stimulus is applied to the animal. The stimulus may be an audible alert, or may be an electrical shock. The correction monitor is operative to monitor correction events and to provide an indication that an event has occurred. An owner of the animal will be notified by the indication that the animal attempted to challenge the system and received a correction. Such notification is evident even if the owner or other applicable person is not present when the animal received the correction, since the indication remains on for an extended period of time, typically 24 hours.
In one embodiment, the correction event can be signaled to an owner or other user at the receiver by use of an LED or other indicator or display which is latched on for a defined period of time. In another embodiment, the correction event can be signaled to a user at a central location, such as by an indicator or display in the animal owner's house. The correction event may also be signaled remotely and displayed in any suitable manner at one or more remote locations. The correction event can be signaled via any convenient wireless or wired communications path or network such as the Internet to provide an output indication that a correction event has occurred. In a further embodiment, the time of each correction event can be signified along with the event indication. By use of the invention, an animal owner or other interested persons can observe the behavior of the animal and the frequency with which the animal has challenged the system.
The animal control system having a correction monitor in accordance with the invention can be used for domestic pets, such as dogs, to monitor and control their behavior in a yard or other domestic setting. The invention can also be used with farm animals and other animals for monitoring their location and behavior such as in a ranch or coral or other area in which the animals are to be contained.
In an alternative embodiment, the receiver worn by the animal can have the capability to identify the geographic position of the animal by utilizing systems such as multi-signal triangulation coordinate systems or GPS systems, as well as providing a stimulus to the animal in the event that the animal attempts to enter a protected zone or attempts to leave a protected zone, and to provide an indication of such stimulus or correction event.
In a further alternative embodiment, multiple protected zones can be provided each having a distinguishable signal characteristic such that the zone challenged by the animal can be identified. This can be accomplished for example by coded transmitter signals provided by the respective antennas defining the perimeter of the respective zones. The signals from the receiver worn by an animal provide a signal indication of a correction event which can be decoded to denote the particular correction zone in which the event occurred.
The invention will be more fully described in the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
An animal control system in which the correction monitor in accordance with the invention is employed is shown in
The receiver 14, shown diagrammatically in
The correction monitor process is shown in the flowchart of
The correction monitor can be employed in animal control systems for both outside and inside use.
For outside use, the protected area is defined by a buried wire antenna which defines the perimeter of an area in which the animal is to be contained or from which the animal is to be restrained from entry.
For indoor use, a wire antenna can be looped around an area to be protected. Typically, the wire is located under a rug or beneath a couch or other piece of furniture. A protected area can also be defined by the radiation pattern of an air core, a ferrite or other stick type antenna. For example, the antenna can be placed on a tabletop or countertop to provide a generally hemispherical radiation pattern and a volume into which the animal should not stray. The entry of the animal into the protected zone will cause the correction.
In another embodiment, a plurality of'protected areas can be defined and distinctive correction signals can be provided in order to differentiate the area or zone in which the correction occurred. The correction monitor can receive the correction signals and provide an indication of the zone in which the correction occurred. The identification of the zone is denoted by the distinct correction signal provided upon entry or attempted entry into that zone by the animal.
The receiver can include or be associated with a coordinate detecting receiver to provide geographic position information in association with the correction indications. Such a receiver can be a GPS receiver or a receiver which utilizes multiple transmitted signals from a local or remote triangulation system.
The monitor signal can be transmitted to one or more remote locations so that the behavior of the animal can be signaled and/or displayed to the animal owner or other interested persons. The monitor information can be posted to an owner's web site or other applicable web site which can be accessed to display the number of corrections which have occurred during a defined period of time. The time when each correction occurred can also be provided.
The monitor signals can be provided to a home automation or home monitoring system as one of the items of information provided to a user. As an example, if a user is away from home, the user can check on various conditions being monitored such as temperature inside the house, possible water in the basement, electrical failure, and other such conditions. Moreover, in accordance with the invention the behavior of the dog or other animal being monitored can be noted with respect to attempts by the animal to enter a protected zone or to leave a protected area. The monitoring of the home conditions can be by a suitable remote display accessible, for example, via the Internet or wirelessly transmitted to the user such as the user's cell phone or other personal digital assistant or other such device.
The invention is not to be limited by what has been particularly shown and described but is to encompass the full spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3589337 | Doss | Jun 1971 | A |
3753421 | Peck | Aug 1973 | A |
3777712 | Gardner et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3980051 | Fury | Sep 1976 | A |
4136338 | Antenore | Jan 1979 | A |
4202293 | Gonda et al. | May 1980 | A |
4335682 | Gonda et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4733633 | Yarnall, Sr. et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4745882 | Yarnall, Sr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
4766847 | Venczel et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4802482 | Gonda et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4887549 | Powell | Dec 1989 | A |
4898120 | Brose | Feb 1990 | A |
5046453 | Vinci | Sep 1991 | A |
5054428 | Farkus | Oct 1991 | A |
5068642 | Hruby et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5121711 | Aine | Jun 1992 | A |
5161485 | McDade | Nov 1992 | A |
5170149 | Yarnall, Sr. et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5241923 | Janning | Sep 1993 | A |
5349926 | McCarney et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353744 | Custer | Oct 1994 | A |
5425330 | Touchton et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5465687 | Custer | Nov 1995 | A |
5533469 | Touchton et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5608381 | McCarney et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610588 | Yarnall, Sr. et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5640932 | Bianco et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642690 | Calabrese et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650770 | Schlager et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5769032 | Yarnall, Sr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787841 | Titus et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5791294 | Manning | Aug 1998 | A |
5794569 | Titus et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5815077 | Christiansen | Sep 1998 | A |
5844489 | Yarnall, Sr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6019066 | Taylor | Feb 2000 | A |
6043748 | Touchton et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058889 | Van Curen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079367 | Stapelfeld et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6095092 | Chou | Aug 2000 | A |
6131535 | So | Oct 2000 | A |
6135060 | So | Oct 2000 | A |
6155208 | Schell et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170439 | Duncan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6360698 | Stapelfeld et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367435 | Okui et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6467435 | Stapelfeld et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6474269 | So | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6561137 | Oakman | May 2003 | B2 |
6575120 | Stapelfeld et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6598563 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600422 | Barry et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6712025 | Petersen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6825768 | Stapelfeld et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6923146 | Kobitz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7042361 | Kazdin et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046152 | Peinetti et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7068174 | Peinetti et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7117822 | Peinetti et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7204204 | Peinetti et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7411492 | Greenberg | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421979 | Kim | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20020073933 | Oakman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030116101 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050066912 | Korbitz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050139169 | So | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060102101 | Kim | May 2006 | A1 |
20070056526 | Gianladis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070095304 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070289554 | Moore | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080236514 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2455843 | Nov 1980 | FR |
WO 9402004 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO 9528691 | Oct 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090071413 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |