Patent Grant
10016733
This invention relates to a surfactant composition that is useful as an alternative to alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEs) as an emulsifier for emulsion polymerization. The surfactant composition contains an alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of the chemical structure described below.
Surfactants are broadly used as wetting agents in waterborne formulations. Alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEs) are widely recognized as good surfactants in a large variety of applications. APE surfactants, however, suffer from a poor public perception of their environmental compatibility. In addition, they are subject to increasing environmental regulation aimed at reducing their consumption in many applications, including in emulsion polymerization (EP). Therefore, the use of APE type surfactants is declining and suppliers are seeking to provide other surfactants to replace them.
Emulsion polymerization (EP) is a polymerization process in which poorly water soluble monomers are emulsified in water with the aid of emulsifiers and then polymerized with initiators. Surfactants play a key role in emulsion polymerization and in particular, APE based surfactants are generally considered the standard. However, in view of the issues with APE surfactants as discussed above, there is a need for new non-APE materials that exhibit properties suitable for emulsion polymerization. Such properties may include reduced foaming, emulsion formulation stability, and mechanical stability.
The problem addressed by this invention is the provision of new surfactants that are commercially viable alternatives for APE materials in emulsion polymerization.
We have now found that surfactant compositions as described herein exhibit a number of useful properties that are comparable to, and in some instances better than, properties observed with APE surfactants. Such properties include, for instance, one or more of good surface tension reduction, low foam and quick foam collapse, rapid wetting, and formulation stability. Advantageously, therefore, the surfactant compositions of the invention are viable alternatives to APE surfactants for emulsion polymerization.
In one aspect, there is provided a surfactant composition comprising an alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula I:
R1O—(CH2CH(R2)—O)x—(CH2CH2O)y—SO3M (I)
wherein R1 is linear or branched C4-C10 alkyl; R2 is CH3 or CH3CH2; x is a real number from 1 to 11; y is a real number from 1 to 20; and M is an alkali metal or NH4.
In another aspect, there is provided a surfactant composition comprising an alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula I, as described above, together with a nonionic alkyl alkoxylate of formula II:
R1O—(CH2CH(R2)—O)x—(CH2CH2O)y—H (II)
wherein R1 is linear or branched C4-C10 alkyl; R2 is CH3 or CH3CH2; x is a real number from 1 to 11; and y is a real number from 1 to 20.
In a further aspect, there is provided a method of using a surfactant composition as described herein as an emulsifier in an emulsion formulation.
Unless otherwise indicated, numeric ranges, for instance as in “from 2 to 10,” are inclusive of the numbers defining the range (e.g., 2 and 10).
Unless otherwise indicated, ratios, percentages, parts, and the like are by weight.
As noted above, the invention provides a surfactant composition comprising an alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula I. The surfactant composition exhibits several useful properties, including one or more of good surface tension reduction, low foam and quick foam collapse, rapid wetting, and calcium ion stability. The advantageous properties render the surfactant composition suitable as an emulsifier for emulsion polymerization.
The alkyl alkoxylate sulfate is of the following formula I:
R1O—(CH2CH(R2)—O)x—(CH2CH2O)y—SO3M (I)
wherein R1 is linear or branched C4-C10 alkyl; R2 is CH3 or CH3CH2; x is a real number from 1 to 11; y is a real number from 1 to 20; and M is an alkali metal or NH4.
In some embodiments, R1 in formula I is linear or branched C6-C10 alkyl, alternatively linear or branched C8-C10 alkyl. In some embodiments, R1 is 2-ethylhexyl (CH3CH2CH2CH2CH(CH2CH3)CH2—). In some embodiments, R1 is 2-propylheptyl (CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH(CH2CH2CH3)CH2—).
In some embodiments, R2 in formula I is CH3. In some embodiments, R2 is CH3CH2.
In some embodiments, x in formula I is from 4 to 6.
In some embodiments, y in formula I is from 1 to 11, alternatively from 3 to 11.
In some embodiments, M in formula I is sodium, potassium, or ammonium. In some embodiments, M is sodium or ammonium.
In some embodiments, in addition to the alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula I, the surfactant composition of the invention also comprises a nonionic alkyl alkoxylate of formula II:
R1O—(CH2CH(R2)—O)x—(CH2CH2O)y—H (II)
wherein R1 is linear or branched C4-C10 alkyl; R2 is CH3 or CH3CH2; x is a real number from 1 to 11; and y is a real number from 1 to 20.
In some embodiments, R1 in formula II is linear or branched C6-C10 alkyl, alternatively linear or branched C8-C10 alkyl. In some embodiments, R1 is 2-ethylhexyl (CH3CH2CH2CH2CH(CH2CH3)CH2—). In some embodiments, R1 is 2-propylheptyl (CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH(CH2CH2CH3)CH2—).
In some embodiments, R2 in formula II is CH3. In some embodiments, R2 is CH3CH2.
In some embodiments, x in formula II is from 4 to 6.
In some embodiments, y in formula II is from 1 to 11, alternatively from 3 to 11.
When the nonionic alkyl alkoxylate of formula II is present in the surfactant composition, the groups R1, R2, x, and y in formula I and formula II may be the same or different. In some embodiments, the groups R1, R2, x, and y in formula I and formula II are the same.
In some embodiments, the surfactant composition of the invention comprises an alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula I and a nonionic alkyl alkoxylate of formula II, wherein the weight ratio of the alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula Ito the nonionic alkyl alkoxylate of formula II is from 99:1 to 10:90. In some embodiments, the weight ratio is from 95:5 to 50:50, alternatively from 90:10 to 70:30.
In some embodiments, the surfactant composition of the invention further comprises water.
In some embodiments, the surfactant composition of the invention comprises an alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula I, a nonionic alkyl alkoxylate of formula II, and water. In some embodiments, the amount of the alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula I is from 20 to 70% by weight, preferably from 30 to 60% by weight; the amount of the alkoxylate of formula II is from 0.1 to 30% by weight, preferably from 0.1 to 10% by weight; and the amount of water is from 25 to 75% by weight, preferably from 40 to 70% by weight, based on the total weight of the alkyl alkoxylate sulfate of formula I, the nonionic alkyl alkoxylate of formula II, and the water.
The surfactant composition of the invention may comprise additional additives, such as other surfactants/emulsifiers, and other additives commonly use in emulsion polymerization. In some embodiments, the surfactant composition of the invention further comprises a nonionic surfactant of the formula III: R3O—(AO)z—H (III), wherein R3 is linear or branched C6-C24 alkyl, AO at each occurrence is ethyleneoxy, propyleneoxy, butyleneoxy, or random or block mixtures thereof, and z is from 1 to 50.
The surfactant compositions of the invention exhibit good surface tension reduction, low foam and quick foam collapse, rapid wetting, and they provide formulation stability properties, including good Ca2+ stability. Ca2+ stability may be understood as the tolerance of an emulsion to electrolytes. In downstream application, numerous additives may be mixed with an emulsion, thus, a good Ca2+ stability indicates a good formulation stability. As a result of these properties, the surfactant compositions are suitable for use as emulsifiers in emulsion polymerization and indeed may be used as replacements for traditional APE based emulsifiers.
The emulsions in which the surfactant compositions of the invention may be used as emulsifiers are typically aqueous emulsions or dispersions of polymers and/or copolymers which are normally obtainable by emulsion polymerization. There are no particular restrictions as to the nature of the polymers and copolymers in these formulations. Polymers or copolymers based on the following monomer units are preferred: acrylic acid, acrylates, butadiene, methacrylic acid, methacrylates, styrene, and vinyl acetate. Thus for instance in some embodiments an emulsion formulation according to the invention comprises a surfactant composition as described above (including all described embodiments thereof), water, and a monomer.
A person of ordinary skill in the art can readily determine the effective amount of the surfactant composition of the invention that should be used in an emulsion polymerization formulation, via a combination of general knowledge of the applicable field as well as routine experimentation where needed. For instance, in some embodiments, a quantity of from 0.01 to 10 phm (per hundred monomer) by active weight of the surfactant composition, alternatively from 0.1 to 5 phm by active weight of the surfactant composition, or alternatively from 0.2 to 3 phm by active weight of the surfactant composition, based on the total weight of monomers used in the emulsion polymerization, may be suitable.
Nonionic alkyl alkoxylates of formula II as described above may be purchased from commercial vendors or they may be prepared by those skilled in the art using literature techniques (see for instance U.S. Patent publication number 2011/0098492, which is incorporated herein by reference). In a typical procedure, a suitable alcohol or fatty acid alcohol is alkoxylated with alkylene oxide compounds. Alkoxylation processes may, for instance, be carried out in the presence of acidic or alkaline catalysts, or by using metal cyanide catalysts. Alkaline catalysts may include, for instance, hydroxides or alcoholates of sodium or potassium, including NaOH, KOH, sodium methoxide, potassium methoxide, sodium ethoxide and potassium ethoxide. Base catalysts are normally used in a concentration of from 0.05 percent to about 5 percent by weight, preferably about 0.1 percent to about 1 percent by weight based on starting material.
The addition of alkylene oxides may, for instance, be carried out in an autoclave under pressures from about 10 psig to about 200 psig, preferably from about 60 to about 100 psig. The temperature of alkoxylation may range from about 30° C. to about 200° C., preferably from about 100° C. to about 160° C. After completion of oxide feeds, the product is typically allowed to react until the residual oxide is less than about 10 ppm. After cooling the reactor to an appropriate temperature ranging from about 20° C. to 130° C., the residual catalyst may be left unneutralized, or neutralized with organic acids, such as acetic, propionic, or citric acid. Alternatively, the product may be neutralized with inorganic acids, such as phosphoric acid or carbon dioxide. Residual catalyst may also be removed using ion exchange or an adsorption media, such as diatomaceous earth.
Alkyl alkoxylates sulfate of formula I may be prepared by sulfation of nonionic alkyl alkoxylates of formula II. For instance, the Chemithon sulfation process via sulfur trioxide is a sulfation process well known to those skilled in the art. Typically, pre-heated nonionic alkyl alkoxylate (40° C.) may be first contacted with an air-diluted sulfur trioxide in a continuous thin-film reactor, resulting in a quick and exothermic reaction. The crude sulfuric ester acid may be collected at about 55° C. A prompt neutralization by NaOH or NH4OH to transform sulfuric ester acid to sulfate salt is advantageous to avoid dark color formation and to reduce formation of impurities. Precise control of the molar ration of SO3 to nonionic alkyl alkoxylate is preferred in order to produce high quality alkyl alkoxylate sulfate.
Some embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail in the following Examples.
Materials used in the examples include the following:
“Alkyl alkoxylate sulfate” means 2-ethylhexyl-O—(CH2CH(CH3)—O)5.5—(CH2CH2O)3—SO3NH4.
“Nonionic alkyl alkoxylate 1” means 2-ethylhexyl-O—(CH2CH(CH3)—O)5.5—(CH2CH2O)3—H.
“Nonionic alkyl alkoxylate 2” means 2-ethylhexyl-O—(CH2CH(CH3)—O)5.5—(CH2CH2O)9—H.
“APE Sulfate” means nonylphenol-(EO)4 Sulfate (an APE material) available from Rhodia as RHODAPEX® CO-436 (comparative material).
“APE-free sulfate” means a C12-14 alcohol(EO)4 sulfate available from Cognis as DISPONIL® FES-32 (comparative material).
Nonylphenol Ethoxylate: An APE material available from The Dow Chemical Company.
Several alkyl alkoxylate sulfate compositions were prepared, including both sodium salt and ammonium salt. Lab-scale samples were prepared based on Chemithon sulfation process. The SO3 was diluted with air to the ratio at 3.5% vol., then, reacted with pre-heated nonionic alkyl alkoxylate surfactants (at 40° C.) in a falling thin film reactor (length 2 m). Molar ratio of SO3 to nonionic alkyl alkoxylate was maintained in the range of 0.98-1.0 by adjustment of the flowrate of nonionic alkyl alkoxylate (3-5 kg/h) to the reactor. Cooling water system was applied in the thin film reactor and the temperature in the ether sulfuric acid tank was measured around 55° C., followed with a prompt neutralization by NaOH or ammonia water with stirring.
Formation of the desired compound was confirmed by NMR. The 13C NMR spectrum showed the disappearance of —CH2OH carbon at the chemical shift at δ=62.0 ppm and the presence of —CH2OSO3− carbon at δ=68.0 ppm, which indicated the high conversion of nonionic alkyl alkoxylate to alkyl alkoxylate sulfate.
The Table 1 shows some analytical date of these samples.
Various properties of inventive and comparative compositions are shown in Table 2.
1Measured according to standard GB/T-5549-2010;
2by GB/T 7462-94 standard;
3by GB/T 11983-2008 standard;
4by GB/T 7381-2010;
As is apparent from Table 2, in comparison with APE sulfate or APE-free sulfate, the inventive compositions showed various useful properties. For instance, the alkyl alkoxylate sulfate +nonionic alkyl alkoxylate 1 composition exhibited surface tension at 32 mN/m, lower than APE sulfate and APE-free sulfate. Both inventive compositions showed low foam, and quick foam collapse, properties, in contrast to both the APE sulfate and APE-free sulfate compositions, which have almost no foam collapse property. Both inventive compositions showed quick wetting property, which was lower than the APE-free sulfate.
Basic Formula of Styrene-Butyl Acrylate Emulsion:
Monomers include: butyl acrylate, styrene, acrylamide and acrylic acid;
Initiator is ammonium persulfate;
Glass transition temperature (Tg): 23° C.;
Anionic surfactants: 0.51 phm (per hundred monomer); non-ionic surfactants: 0.54 phm.
Basic Formulation of Pure Acrylate Emulsion:
Monomers include: acrylic acid, butyl acrylate, methacrylic acid;
Glass transition temperature (Tg): 10° C.;
Anionic surfactants: 1.0 phm.
Basic Polymerization Procedure of Styrene-Butyl Acrylate Emulsion:
Pre-emulsify the alkyl alkoxylate sulfate composition with sodium bicarbonate, water and above mentioned monomers. Add the second part of surfactant composition and water into the reactor; start heating to a temperature in the range of 80-90° C.; then, add the first part of ammonium persulfate. Start dropwise addition of pre-emulsion with the second part of ammonium persulfate during 3 h. After addition, keep at the same temperature for 1 h; an emulsion polymerization is performed. After cooling down to room temperature and pH adjustment by aqueous ammonia to neutral 40° C., the polymer emulsion is obtained.
Preparation of other Emulsions:
For the other emulsions preparation, the procedure described above is followed. Emulsifier composition is changed. See the below Table 3 for the emulsifier details of other emulsions.
Foaming Property
The emulsion is diluted to 1% by weight of its solid content. Then, 250 mL of diluted emulsion are poured into a test tube. Air-bubble (air-flow at 1.8 L/s) the aqueous emulsion solution for 1 min; stop air-bubbling and record the foam heights in the next 5 min. Foam test results are shown in
Ca2+ Stability
Test method: Add CaCl2 aqueous solution (concentration at 5 or 10% wt.) into 20 ml of emulsion; store the CaCl2 containing emulsion for 48 h at room temperature; any agglomeration or non-homogeneity present in the emulsion signifies poor Ca2+ stability, consequently, failure in the Ca2+ stability test. Test results are shown in Table 4.
In Table 4, the comparison 1 shows that in St-Acrylate emulsion, when no non-ionic surfactant is added as emulsifier, the emulsion with alkyl alkoxylate sulfate as emulsifier demonstrated better Ca2+ stability than the one with APE sulfate. In the comparison 2, when the same non-ionic surfactant (nonylphenol ethoxylate) was added in the surfactant composition in St-Acrylate emulsion, the emulsion with alkyl alkoxylate sulfate as emulsifier had better Ca2+ stability than both others with APE sulfate and APE-free sulfate in the surfactant composition.
In the comparison 3, the comparison between alkyl alkoxylate sulfate composition and classic APE surfactant composition in St-Acrylate emulsion was made. Alkyl alkoxylate sulfate offered not only an eco-friendly profile but also better performance on Ca2+ stability.
In the comparison 4, no non-ionic emulsifier was used in the Pure Acrylate emulsion. Alkyl alkoxylate sulfate provided also an improved Ca2+ stability.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2012/082444 | 9/29/2012 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014/047924 | 4/3/2014 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3120505 | McCubbin et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
| 3317495 | Jones et al. | May 1967 | A |
| 3565939 | Beiser | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3890239 | Dycus et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 4285356 | Sifferman | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4293428 | Gale et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4299994 | Stahl | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4395364 | Murata et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4879399 | Latella et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 6048831 | Mori et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6147131 | Mork et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6380302 | Ikenaga et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6506715 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6706931 | Edwards | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6891056 | Edwards et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7833518 | Sakuma et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7906474 | Varineau et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8048842 | Doi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8309510 | Chiba et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8828364 | Gates et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8877702 | Nomura et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9555385 | Shen | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 20060148981 | Schmidt-Thummes et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20080207939 | Tropsch | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20100305254 | Ikenaga | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110098492 | Varineau et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152425 | Tysak et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245131 | Mu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110266496 | Mitsuda et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120115769 | Nomura | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20150224462 | Shen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150367307 | Shen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20170002296 | Shen | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1266065 | Mar 2005 | CN |
| 101584974 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 101896506 | Nov 2010 | CN |
| 102257111 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| S5778937 | May 1982 | JP |
| 1998036885 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| 2000345191 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2006232946 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2006232947 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2007077181 | Mar 2007 | JP |
| 2010185063 | Mar 2009 | JP |
| WO 2011007891 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2011110503 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2012147915 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Derwent Abstract, week 201710, London: Derwent Publications Ltd., AN 2014-R06848, Class A60, U.S. Pat. No. 9555385 B2, (Dow Global Technologies Inc), abstract. |
| Derwent Abstract, week 201706, London: Derwent Publications Ltd., AN 2015-355524, Class A25, US 20170002296 A1, (Dow Global Technologies Inc), abstract. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150224462 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
