BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is an exploded view of a bumper system including one embodiment of the anisotropic modular energy absorber of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view of one module of a bi-sectional form of energy absorber;
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a bi-sectional form of energy absorbing module depicting a number of breaches within the walls of a section in some energy absorbing units;
FIG. 4 is a rear perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is an end view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view of an energy absorber with five energy absorbing modules, similar to that depicted in FIG. 1;
FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a means for locating the sections of an energy absorbing unit in relation to each other;
FIG. 8 depicts an embodiment of a multi-sectional energy absorber in which energy absorbing units are placed in a staggered or alternating sequence and in which various dome sizes of energy absorbers are alternately positioned forwardly and rearwardly;
FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a bi-sectional embodiment of an energy absorbing module in which two sections of the module appear as they might emerge from a forming tool;
FIG. 10 depicts along the line X-X of FIG. 6 one form of a hinge region that unites two sections of a bi-sectional energy absorbing unit;
FIG. 11 depicts a sectional view along the line XI-XI of FIG. 6 of an attachment area between adjacent energy absorbing units shown in FIG. 10;
FIG. 12 depicts a sectional view along the line XII-XII of FIG. 6 illustrating a location and attachment area;
FIG. 13 is a horizontal sectional view of a multi-sectional modular energy absorber with a bumper beam that lies inboard of the multi-sectional energy absorber;
FIG. 14 is a graph of force versus deflection for a conventional thermoformed energy absorber (lower line) and one constructed according to the present invention (upper line);
FIG. 15 is a force versus deflection curve comparing the invention (lower line) to a foam energy absorber (upper line);
FIG. 16 is a top plan view of an alternate embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 17 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line XVII-XVII (FIG. 16) of one energy absorbing unit of the embodiment of FIG. 16;
FIG. 18 is a front view of a central portion of an alternate embodiment of an energy absorber;
FIG. 19 is a front view of an end portion of a box-shaped energy absorber;
FIG. 20 is a front view of an alternate embodiment of an energy absorber that has an augmented wall volume on a lower face thereof;
FIG. 21 is a front view of an embodiment of an energy absorber wherein a hinge region is relocated so that it is lower on a front face thereof;
FIG. 22 is a quartering perspective view of an energy absorber that includes a means for supporting the fascia;
FIG. 23 is a quartering perspective view of an end of a bumper beam that is at least partially protected by an anisotropic multi-sectional energy absorber according to the present invention;
FIG. 24 is a sectional view of a fascia-energy absorber-bumper beam system that illustrates one way to attach the energy absorber to the bumper beam and fascia;
FIG. 25 depicts a sectional view of an energy absorbing system that supports knee loads that are downwardly applied from an upper region thereof;
FIG. 26 is a sectional view of an embodiment of an energy absorbing system that depicts one way in which part of an energy absorber may be attached to a bumper beam;
FIG. 27 is a sectional view of an embodiment of an energy absorbing system that illustrates how a dome of an energy absorber may be attached to a face of a bumper beam;
FIG. 28 is a sectional view of an embodiment of an energy absorbing system that illustrates how a dome of an energy absorber may be attached to fascia;
FIG. 29 is a front view of an embodiment of an energy absorber illustrating an absorber that is anisotropic in that it has multiple densities of energy absorbing structures wherein the number of energy absorbing units per unit length at a central portion is less than the number of energy absorbers per unit length toward the end of the energy absorber;
FIG. 30 is a top view that illustrates an embodiment of an energy absorber wherein different mating surfaces are joined together between adjacent energy absorbing units;
FIG. 31 is a graph of displacement against dynamic force comparing the performance of a multi-sectional energy absorber with an expanded polypropylene bumper foam;
FIG. 32 is a graph of displacement against dynamic force for different beginning sheet thicknesses; and
FIG. 33 depicts an embodiment of an energy absorbing system wherein an attachment point is placed in an intermediate wall of an energy absorbing unit.