The present invention relates to annular divided wall columns for the cryogenic distillation of air or constituents of air. More particularly, the present invention relates to an annular divided wall column that includes an annulus column region defined as the space between a first annular column wall and a second annular column wall and an interior core column region defined as the interior space of the second annular column wall with a plurality of packing elements or trays disposed within the interior core column region and the annulus column region.
A major capital expense of a rectification plant for the separation of air into components based on their relative volatility is the cost of the column casing and the space required for the column. This is particularly the case where two or more columns are required to conduct the separation. Such multi-column systems are often used in cryogenic rectification, such as in the cryogenic rectification of air, where columns may be stacked vertically or located side by side. It would be highly desirable to have a system which will enable rectification to be carried out with reduced column cost and with reduced space requirements for the columns.
Divided-wall columns have been proposed in the literature as a means to better utilize a given column diameter, and thereby reduce the capital cost associated with construction of a plant to facilitate the separation process. Divided-wall columns essentially contain multiple distillation sections at the same elevation within a single column shell. An early example of the use of a divided-wall column is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,946,942 and 6,023,945 (Wong, et al.) discloses an application of divided-wall principles to air separation. These prior art systems disclose an apparatus wherein the lower pressure column contains an inner annular wall. The region contained between the inner annular wall and the outer shell of the lower pressure column constitutes a section for the production of argon product. A drawback of the prior art divided-wall column structures includes maldistribution of vapor within the annular divided wall columns separation sections as well as maldistribution of the down-flowing liquids due to the large wall surface area, especially if the separation sections use structured packing as the mass-transfer elements.
Accordingly it is an object of this invention to provide a column system for rectification of air which has reduced costs and space requirements over conventional air separation column systems and that overcomes the difficulties and disadvantages of the prior art annular divided wall columns to provide better and more advantageous performance.
The present invention may be characterized as an annular column comprising: (i) a first annular column wall; (ii) a second annular column wall radially spaced from the first annular column wall and disposed within a first interior space of the first annular column wall to define an annulus column region between the first annular column wall and the second annular column wall and to define an interior core column region as part or all of a second interior space of the second annular column wall; (iii) a plurality of structured packing elements of a first type disposed within the annulus column region; and (iv) a plurality of structured packing elements of a second type disposed within the interior core column region, wherein the first type of structured packing elements and the second type of structured packing elements have different surface area densities.
In some embodiments of the present annular divided wall column, the first type of structured packing elements and the second type of structured packing elements may also have different geometries, and in particular different nominal inclination angle of corrugations to the horizontal axis.
While the specification concludes with claims distinctly pointing out the subject matter that applicants regard as their invention, it is believed that the invention will be better understood when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
The following paragraphs include detailed descriptions of various embodiments of the present annular divided wall column for the cryogenic rectification of air, including descriptions of: (i) annular divided wall column structures; (ii) process and/or service arrangements for the different regions within the annular divided wall column; and (iii) arrangements of mass transfer elements within the annular divided wall column.
Annular Divided Wall Column Structures
As seen in the
Examples of different arrangements of mass transfer elements and other devices employed within the present annular divided wall column are generally depicted in
In
In
In
Turning now to
In
In the illustrated two-column divided wall arrangements, a cap or header 190 may be employed to partially enclose either the annulus column region 114 or the interior core column region 118. To partially enclose the annulus column region 114, a cap or header 190 is placed above the annulus column region that extends from the top of the second annular column wall 116 to an intermediate location of the first annular column wall 112. To partially enclose the interior core column region, a cap or header is attached to the top of the second annular column wall 116 to cover the interior core column region 118.
Turning now to
In this three-column divided wall arrangements, an outer cap 222 or outer header covering the outer column region 219 is provided. Such outer cap 222 or outer header preferably extends from the top of the third column wall 217 to an intermediate location of the first annular column wall 212 to partially enclose the outer column region 219.
In
While the outer column region 219 of
An alternate embodiment of the three-column divided wall arrangements is shown in
In
In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to apply a high flux coating or porous coating to an interior surface of the first annular column wall or third annular column wall. Similarly, a high flux coating or porous coating may also be applied to a surface of the second annular column wall, preferably the surface exposed to the colder fluid. As used herein, the terms ‘high-flux coating’ and ‘porous coating’ refers to those coatings that by virtue of its built-in porosity enhance boiling by providing so-called nucleation sites. The porous coating provides micro-scale cavities that have the effect of increasing the number of nucleation sites and bubble departure frequency per site. As a result, the boiling rate can be enhanced. Examples of such high flux coatings or porous coatings are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2017/0108148 and 2017/0108296, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference.
In other embodiments, the interior surface of the first annular column wall, interior surface of the first annular column wall, or one or more surfaces of the second annular column wall may also include surface texturing. The term “surface texturing”, as used herein, is to be understood as denoting any roughening, grooving, fluting, or otherwise forming or impressing a geometric pattern on the wall surface.
Process/Service Arrangements in an Annular Divided Wall Column
In some embodiments, the annular column region is designed or configured for rectification of an argon-oxygen containing stream to separate the argon-oxygen containing stream into an argon-rich overhead stream and an oxygen-rich stream. In other embodiments, the annular column region is designed or configured for rectification of a nitrogen-oxygen containing stream to separate the nitrogen-oxygen containing stream into a nitrogen rich overhead stream and an oxygen-rich stream.
Similarly, the interior core column region is designed or configured for rectification of an argon-oxygen containing stream to separate the argon-oxygen containing stream into an argon-rich overhead stream and an oxygen-rich stream. In other embodiments, the interior core column region is designed or configured for rectification of a nitrogen-oxygen containing stream to separate the nitrogen-oxygen containing stream into a nitrogen rich overhead stream and an oxygen-rich stream.
In yet other embodiments, the annular column region may be designed or configured for rectification of a nitrogen-oxygen containing stream to separate the nitrogen-oxygen containing stream into a first nitrogen rich overhead stream and a first oxygen-rich stream of a first purity and the interior core column region may be designed or configured for rectification of another nitrogen-oxygen containing stream to separate it into a second nitrogen rich overhead stream and a second oxygen-rich stream of a second purity. Alternatively, the annular column region may be designed or configured for rectification of a nitrogen-oxygen containing stream to separate the nitrogen-oxygen containing stream into a first nitrogen rich overhead stream of a first purity and a first oxygen-rich stream while the interior core column region may be designed or configured for rectification of another nitrogen-oxygen containing stream to separate it into a second nitrogen rich overhead stream of a second purity and a second oxygen-rich stream.
Other contemplated process or service arrangements for the annular divided wall column include disposing a heat exchange device or a phase separator device within the interior core column region. The heat exchange device disposed in the interior core column region is preferably either: (i) an argon condenser configured to condense an argon-rich stream for use as a reflux stream, or a liquid argon product stream; (ii) a main condenser-reboiler configured to condense a nitrogen-rich stream for use as a reflux stream or a liquid nitrogen product stream; or (iii) a subcooler configured to subcool a nitrogen-rich liquid stream, an oxygen rich liquid stream, or a liquid air stream for use in the cryogenic air separation plant. In embodiments where a phase separator device is disposed in the interior core column region, the phase separator is preferably configured to separate a two-phase oxygen-containing stream into an oxygen containing liquid stream and an oxygen containing vapor stream.
Still other contemplated process or service arrangements for the annular divided wall column include using the outer column region in a three-column divided wall arrangement as a vapor conduit or disposing one or more vapor conduits within outer column region in a three-column divided wall arrangement that is configured to direct one or more streams to selected locations in the annular column region or the interior core column region.
Mass Transfer Elements in an Annular Divided Wall Column
Turning now to
Where packing is employed in either the annulus column region or the interior core column region of the annular divided wall column, possible column packing arrangements include structured packing, strip packing, random packing, or even silicon carbide foam packing, as described in more detail below. Such packing arrangements would further include a plurality of liquid distributors, collectors, or combined collector-distributor devices of the type shown and described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,004,460 and 9,457,291, incorporated by reference herein. The preferred embodiments include structured packing as such arrangements advantageously provide lower pressure drop, higher efficiency, higher capacity; and reduced liquid hold-up compared to trays and random packing. However, structured packing is prone to liquid maldistribution.
Structured packing is generally formed from corrugated sheets of perforated embossed metal or plastic, or wire gauze. The resulting structure is a very open honeycomb-like structure with inclined flow channels of the corrugations giving a relatively high surface area but with very low resistance to gas flow. In applications using structured packing, the structured packing is preferably constructed of materials selected from the group consisting of: aluminum sheet metal, stainless steel sheet metal, stainless steel gauze, copper and plastic. The surfaces of the structured packing may be smooth or may include surface texturing such as grooving, fluting, or patterned impressions on the surfaces of the structured packing sheets. Examples of the preferred types of structured packing are shown and described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,632,934 and 9,295,925; the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The size or configuration of structure packing is broadly defined by the surface area density of the packing and the inclination angle of the corrugated flow channels in the main mass transfer section of the structured packing. The preferred density of the structured packing is between about 100 m2/m3 to 1200 m2/m3 and more preferably are selected from the group of commercially available structured packing having surface area densities of 110 m2/m3; 220 m2/m3; 250 m2/m3; 350 m2/m3; 430 m2/m3; 500 m2/m3; 730 m2/m3; 950 m2/m3; and 1200 m2/m3. The geometry of the structure packing, as characterized by the inclination angle of the corrugated flow channels in the main mass transfer section of the structured packing, preferably includes a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of between about 35° to 70°, which encompasses X-size packing (i.e. nominal inclination angle of about 60°), Y-size packing (i.e. nominal inclination angle of about 45°); and Z-size packing (i.e. nominal inclination angle of about 40°).
In some embodiments, the structured packing configuration for the annulus column region of the annular divided wall column are a plurality of curved or arcuate wedge shaped bricks 375 or curved bricks, shown in
Alternatively, structured packing made of silicon carbide may be used in selected applications. Such silicon carbide or other foam like material packing is generally described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,375,655; while in applications using strip packing, the preferred arrangement is similar to that disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0061541. Both disclosures are incorporated by reference herein.
In applications using random packing, the preferred types of random packing elements include proprietary packing selected from the group consisting of: Berl Saddle packing; Rashig Ring packing; Pall® Ring packing; Intalox® Saddle packing; Intalox® Metal Tower Packing (IMTP®); Cascade® MiniRing (CMR®) packing; Nutter Ring® packing; or other commercially available random packing. Such random packing elements preferably have a nominal piece size ranging from about 15 mm to about 100 mm. Examples of several types of random packings 390A, 390B, 390C are shown in
Examples of different arrangements of structured packing employed within the present annular divided wall column are generally illustrated in
Similarly, a plurality of structured packing elements of a first type 455A are disposed within the annulus column region and a plurality of structured packing elements of a second type 425B are disposed within the interior core column region, wherein the first type of structured packing elements 455A and the second type of structured packing elements 425B have different geometries. For example, the structured packing elements disposed within the annulus column region may have a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of about 55° to 70° to minimize wall flow whereas the structured packing elements disposed within the interior core column region may have a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of about 45° to 55°.
In other embodiments, the structured packing elements in either the interior core column region or the annulus column region may comprise two or more beds of structured packing. In addition, where multiple beds of structured packing are employed in either region, the adjacent beds may have different surface area densities and/or different geometries. For example, a first bed of structured packing elements 425C of a first surface area density may be disposed within the interior core column region while a second bed structured packing elements 425D of a second surface area density is also disposed within the interior core column region above or below the first bed of structured packing elements 425C of the first surface area density. In such example, the first bed of structured packing elements 425C disposed within the interior core column region may have a surface area density of between about 400 to 700 m2/m3 whereas the second bed of structured packing elements 425D disposed within the interior core column region may have a surface area density of between about 700 to 1000 m2/m3.
Likewise, a first bed of structured packing elements 455E having a first surface area density is disposed within the annulus column region while a second bed structured packing elements 455F having a second surface area density may be disposed within the annulus column region above or below the first bed of structured packing elements 455E. In this example, the first bed of structured packing elements 455E disposed within the annulus column region may have a surface area density of 700 m2/m3 or less whereas the second bed of structured packing elements 455F disposed within the annulus column region may have a surface area density of about 700 to 1200 m2/m3.
Still further, a first bed of structured packing elements 455G having a first geometry or density may be disposed within the annulus column region while a second bed of structured packing elements 455H having a second geometry or density is also disposed within the annulus column region above or below the first bed of structured packing elements 455G. For example, the first bed of structured packing elements 455G disposed within the annulus column region may have a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of about 55° to 70° whereas the second bed of structured packing elements 455H disposed within the annulus column region may have a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of about 45° to 55°. Similarly, the first bed of structured packing elements 425J having a first geometry or density may be disposed within the interior core column region while the second bed of structured packing elements 425K having a second geometry or density is also disposed within the interior core column region above or below the first bed of structured packing elements. An example would be wherein the first bed of structured packing elements 425J may have a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of about 55° to 70° while the second bed of structured packing elements 425K may have a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of about 30° to 55°.
Certain preferred embodiments employ a combination of structured packing elements and trays. For example, a plurality of structured packing elements may be disposed within the interior core column region and a plurality of trays is also disposed within the interior core column region above and/or below the structured packing elements. In such embodiments, the structured packing elements disposed within the interior core column region may have a surface area densities of between about 100 m2/m3 to 1200 m2/m3 and a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of between about 35° to 70°, while the plurality of trays may be selected from the group consisting of: ring trays; horseshoe trays; parallel flow trays; two pass crossflow trays; two pass parallel flow trays; multiple downcomer trays; or combinations thereof.
While the present invention has been characterized in various ways and described in relation to the preferred structural embodiments and/or preferred methods, there are numerous additions, changes and modifications that can be made to the disclosed structures and methods without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims. For example, while the present annular divided wall column has been shown and described as suitable for use in the cryogenic rectification of air or constituents of air in an air separation unit, it is fully contemplated that such annular divided wall column arrangements may also be suitable for the separation or purification of other industrial gases including off-gases or tail gases of various industrial processes.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/042,189 filed on Jul. 23, 2018 that claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/550,262 filed on Aug. 25, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5339648 | Lockett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5632934 | Billingham et al. | May 1997 | A |
5946942 | Wong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6023945 | Wong et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6214174 | Matsumoto | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240744 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
7604222 | Zone et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7678237 | De Graauw et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8480860 | Kovak | Jul 2013 | B2 |
9004460 | Brown et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9295925 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9375655 | Billingham et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9457291 | Brown et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9827543 | Pretz | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10578355 | Saboda | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10578356 | Saboda | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10578357 | Saboda | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10684071 | Larson | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20040134135 | Zich et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060082006 | Zone | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060230613 | Whittenberger | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20130233016 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20160061541 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170030638 | Prosser et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170030639 | Du et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170051971 | Goloubev | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170108148 | Lu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170108296 | Kwark et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20190063828 | Larson | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20200149809 | Saboda | May 2020 | A1 |
20200149810 | Saboda | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
106 642 987 | May 2017 | CN |
1 647 318 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2 776 206 AL | Sep 1999 | FR |
WO 2011064580 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2012056278 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012058009 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2016138995 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2017084729 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Helmut Jansen et al.; “New Horizons for Dividing Wall Columns”; Chemical Engineering, pp. 40-48; www.che.com; Aug. 1, 2014; XP055384430. |
Koch-Glitsch, “Packed Tower Internals”; Bulletin KGMTIG-1. Rev. Jun. 2010, available online at http://folk.ntnu.no/skoge/prost/proceedings/distillation10/DA2010%20Sponsor%20Information/Koch%20Glitsch/Packed_Tower/Tower_Internatls/Metal_PTI.pdf (Year: 2010). |
Koch-Glitsch, “Structured Packing”, Bulletin KGSP-2. Rev. Apr. 2015, available online at: http://www.koch-glitsch.com/Document%20Library/KGSP.pdf (Year: 2015). |
Koch-Glitsch; “Packed Tower Internals”; Bulletin KGMTIG-1. Rev. Jun. 2010. Available online at: http://folk.ntnu.no/skoge/prost/proceedings/distillation10/DA2010%20Information/Koch%20Glitsch/Packed_Tower/Tower_Internals/Metal_PTI.pdf (Year: 2010). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200256616 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16042189 | Jul 2018 | US |
Child | 16857831 | US |