One measure of performance of nuclear fuel rods is the ability of heat generated in the fuel to be transferred to the primary coolant through the cladding of the fuel rod. A proposed improvement to uranium oxide nuclear fuel rods, allowing higher heat transfer and thus higher reactor power from the same core volume, was the inclusion of a central void region with additional cladding running the length of the fuel rod. Coolant passed through this region as well as over the exterior of the fuel rod, increasing the total surface area over which coolant flowed and heat could be transferred.
However, actual performance of this annular design was inhibited by several factors. First, the uranium oxide fuels tended to expand at operational temperatures resulting in the fuel separating from the inner cladding and reducing the thermal conductivity between the inner cladding and the fuel. Second, the fission reaction caused the uranium oxide fuel to swell due to the generation of fission products within the fuel. As a result, either use of sufficiently strong claddings to hold the pressure created by the swelling of hard uranium oxide fuel or provision of an expansion space between the cladding and the fuel in anticipation of the swelling was required. Both of these compromises have a detrimental effect on the overall thermal conductivity between the fuel and the exterior of the cladding. Third, low density uranium dioxide fuel requires relatively high enrichment to accommodate power increases without reduction of cycle length and additional parasitic neutron absorption in the second cladding. Finally, uranium dioxide fuel operates at a relatively high temperature which poses additional design challenges.
Another measure of performance of nuclear fuel rod designs is related to accident tolerance. Many traditional fuel designs have been proven to operate well under normal plant operating conditions but have not performed well under severe-accident scenarios. This can lead to the destruction of the fuel cladding and the release of fission products in the event of a beyond-design-basis condition, such as that which occurred in both the Three Mile Island and Fukushima accidents.
Annular metal fuel and fuel rods are described below that have improved performance over uranium oxide fuel rods. The annular metal fuel can be made out of porous metal nuclear fuel and will generate more power and operate at a much lower temperature than uranium oxide fuel. The annular metal fuel rods may be used in any fast spectrum reactor including, for example, traveling wave reactors. Pressurized water reactors (PWRs) may also be retrofitted with annular metal fuel rods to improve reactor performance. The metal fuel may be one or more annuli of solid fuel, referred to as annular slugs, or may be in the form of fuel particles or fuel powder packed into the annular region defined by the inner cladding and outer cladding. The metal fuel may be initially porous or may become porous as a result of irradiation. As annular metal fuels offer greater uranium density than is possible using typical uranium oxide (e.g., UO2) fuels, the power generation of existing reactors may be increased with little or no modification of the existing equipment. This is primarily enabled due to the additional heat transfer surface of the inner cladding. In addition, the increased uranium loading of the metallic fuel potentially enables increased cycle lengths or burnup. For example, in an embodiment the annular metal fuels are estimated to allow up to a 50% power increase in a PWR compared to a traditional oxide fuel in the same core volume.
The following drawing figures, which form a part of this application, are illustrative of described technology and are not meant to limit the scope of the invention as claimed in any manner, which scope shall be based on the claims appended hereto.
Before the annular metal fuel rods, which may alternatively be referred to as fuel pins, and construction methods are disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments of the annular metal fuel only and is not intended to be limiting. It must be noted that, as used in this specification, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a lithium hydroxide” is not to be taken quantitatively or as source limiting, reference to “a step” may include multiple steps, reference to “producing” or “products” of a reaction should not be taken to be all of the products of a reaction, and reference to “reacting” may include reference to one or more of such reaction steps. As such, the step of reacting can include multiple or repeated reactions of similar materials to produce identified reaction products.
The central void region 108 of the annular fuel rod, which may also be referred to as a central coolant channel, is an inner channel through the fuel slugs 102. This central region 108 provides a coolant flow path and contact surface (with the inner cladding 104) through the center of the rod 120. The central region 108 may be co-axial with the long axis of the fuel rod (as shown) or may be offset.
As shown in
In the embodiment shown, the central region 108 extends for the entire length of the fuel rod 120 including the end caps 122. In an alternative embodiment, a manifold type arrangement may be provided in one or both end caps 122 or in the plenum(s) 126 so the central region 108 extends only through annular fuel slugs 102 and some or all of the plenum(s) 126.
Fuel rods 120 may be made to meet the form factor and design requirements for existing nuclear pressurized water reactor (PWR) designs. This allows existing reactor designs to be retrofitted with fuel rods containing annular metal fuels. As annular metal fuels offer greater uranium density than is possible using typical uranium oxide (e.g., UO2) fuels, the power generation of existing reactors may be increased with little or no modification of the existing equipment. This is primarily enabled due to the additional heat transfer surface of the inner cladding. In addition, the increased uranium loading of the metallic fuel potentially enables increased cycle lengths or burnup. For example, in an embodiment the annular metal fuels are estimated to allow up to a 50% power increase in a PWR compared to a traditional oxide fuel in the same core volume.
Yet another benefit is that the annular metal fuel rods may be heated up more quickly than traditional UO2 fuel rods without risking damage to the fuel matrix and cladding. UO2 fuels can shatter due to differential thermal stress on the fuel if heated too quickly and fuel-cladding mechanical interaction from the hard UO2 pellets can lead to cladding damage. This limits the speed at which traditional UO2 equipped nuclear reactors can be brought up to full power and, thus, limits such reactors' use as load following power plants that must adjust power output in response to electricity demand. Annular metal fuel rods, as described herein, may be heated up much more quickly than UO2 fuel rods (for example, it is estimated that uranium-zirconium fuel rods may be heated up at approximately 6 times the rate of UO2 fuel rods). This allows existing reactors retrofitted with annular metal fuel rods to be more effectively used as load following power plants.
As illustrated, the cross-sectional shape of the exterior of the fuel rod and the inner region may be the same or different. In an embodiment, the rod configuration can maintain control rod and guide thimble tubes.
In addition, non-cylindrical fuel rods may be provided with a helical twist along their length on either the interior surface or the exterior surface, or both. For example, the design could also involve rifling the inner surface of the inner cladding or exterior surface for better heat transfer and optimization of flow distribution between the inner cladding and outer cladding. Alternatively, the exterior surface of the rods could be provided with a helical wire wrap (not shown) and/or a rigid helical structure could be attached to either or both of the exterior or interior surfaces.
Thin liners (not shown) between claddings and fuel can be also used, if needed, to prevent fuel cladding chemical interaction and in the case of cladding breach, can be expected to reduce the reaction of metal fuel with water coolant.
Annular metal fuel rods may be a unitary construction as shown in
In the portion of the fuel rod 420 illustrated, the fuel rod 420 includes two annular fuel segments 452 connected by a connector segment 454. The connector segment 454 includes two chambers 456 connecting the central region 408 to the exterior of the fuel rod 420. Depending on the embodiment, more or fewer chambers may be used in the connector segment. The chambers 456 allow flow between the central region 408 and the exterior of a rod 420 to enhance the circulation of the coolant.
Annular metal fuel can be made out of porous metal nuclear fuel. Metal fuels include uranium, plutonium, uranium-zirconium (U—Zr) alloys, uranium-zirconium-niobium (U—Zr—Nb) alloys, uranium-plutonium-zirconium (U—Pu—Zr) alloys, uranium-plutonium-molybdenum (U—Pu—Mo) alloys, uranium-plutonium-niobium (U—Pu—Nb) alloys, uranium-plutonium-titanium (U—Pu—Ti) alloys, uranium-molybdenum (U—Mo) alloys, uranium-niobium (U—Nb) alloys, uranium-vanadium (U—V) alloys, uranium-chromium (U—Cr) alloys, and uranium-titanium (U—Ti) alloys. For the balance of this disclosure the embodiments of annular metal fuel will be presented in terms of U—Zr as the nuclear fuel. However, any metal nuclear fuel may be used in any of the embodiments described below. In an alternative embodiment, the fuel is not porous initially, but becomes porous during operation as the fuels swells during irradiation. While metal fuels do not include oxides such as uranium dioxide, in some embodiments an exterior surface of an annular fuel slug or metal fuel particle may have been exposed to oxygen resulting in trace amounts (less than 0.1% by weight) of oxides forming on the surface. For the purposes of this disclosure, the term “metal fuel” includes fuels with such trace amounts of oxides and is not limited to fuels having absolutely no measurable oxides.
Specifically with regards to metal fuels containing Zr (e.g., U—Zr and U—Pu—Zr), the percentage of Zr alloy can range from 1-20 wt. %, (e.g., 1 wt. %, 5 wt. %, 7.5 wt. %, 10 wt. %, 12.5 wt. %, 15 wt. % or 20 wt. % or any amount in between) and can be optimized for performance in PWR. Also, Zr fuel alloys are shown as an example and can be replaced or combined with one or more other alloy components (Cr, Ti, V, Ni, Nb, Al, Si, Mo). Such alloys may have better performance (i.e. reduced reactivity) when exposed to water. Also, doping additives could be added to the fuel to achieve desirable characteristics, in particular, resistance to reaction with water in case of cladding breach.
While traditional uranium oxide fuel rods' thermal performance is hindered by the existence of a helium filled gap between the fuel pellets and the cladding and the thermal conductivity of the uranium oxide pellets themselves, the metal fuel rods described herein are not so limited. Metal fuels undergo a larger amount of thermal expansion and have a higher thermal conductivity than traditional uranium oxide fuel pellets. Even though a clearance fit or gap may be necessary to allow a fuel slug to be inserted into the claddings, the metal alloys described above and U—Zr alloys in particular exhibit a larger thermal expansion than the cladding materials such that the gap will be eliminated at operational temperatures resulting in very good thermal contact between the fuel and the inner and outer claddings at operational temperatures. The high thermal conductivity of the fuel allows it to operate with significant unbonds, and because of the low creep strength of the fuel it is able to fill gaps. Annular fuel operates at much lower fuel temperatures than solid fuels. For UO2 fuel peak fuel temperature is 2200° C. Peak fuel temperature for annular metal fuel is estimated to be from 400-500° C. if annular fuel is operated at 50% higher power than a UO2-fueled reactors. In addition to a substantial reduction of the conduction length due to annular geometry, it is the elimination of the gap and higher internal thermal conductivity that allow annular metal fuel rods to operate at such low temperatures while still generating the same or more power than a UO2-fueled reactor.
The low peak fuel temperature is another benefit of the annular metal fuel design over the traditional fuels. In addition, the lower heat capacity of metal fuel will further reduce stored energy and improve the loss of coolant accident (LOCA) performance of a reactor. Moreover, its benefit will improve the accident tolerability of the reactor core against the severe accident (SA) such as the station black out (SBO) during the Fukushima crisis. High thermal conductivity of the fuel will also support more rapid plant startup and increase the operational flexibility of the reactor to be used as load following power plants as described above.
As discussed above, the metal fuel may be an annular slug of metal fuel or may be in the form of fuel particles or fuel powder contained in the annular region defined by the inner cladding 104 and outer cladding 106. Metal fuel, even solid porous slugs, allows packing more heavy metal into the same volume than oxide fuel. This reduces required enrichment and reduces reactivity swing during the cycle and thus the required amount of burnable poison or boric acid in the coolant. The higher heavy metal packing also allows potential for use of different cladding materials beyond zirconium-based materials, which may have better high temperature performance or increased safety performance. Metal fuels also are more prone to release their fission gases to open space within the fuel rod, which can help reduce local stresses.
Particulate forms of fuel, such as fuel particles or fuel powder (powder defined as particles having a 0.5 mm diameter or less), may be packed into the annular region in order to achieve the desired porosity of the fuel. In one embodiment, the particulate may be vibration packed into the fuel rod to achieve a target bulk density and thereby achieve a corresponding target porosity.
Metal fuel powder may be manufactured in any suitable way. In addition, mixing of burnable poison materials such as gadolinium, boron, and erbium may improve reactor core economy. A small concentration of binding material such as zinc stearate or zinc behenate may be used to enhance compaction of fuel powder and prevent massive relocation of the fuel powder during shipping and handling. Other powder additives that may be suitable include lubricants (such as paraffin wax, stearates including aluminum, lithium, butyl, magnesium and sodium stearate, oleic acid, poly glycols, graphite and boron nitride) and other binders such as poly ethylene glycol.
A holddown device such as a solid ring or annular slug of zirconium or some other material that does not interact with uranium on the top of the powder stack may minimize the relocation of powder by providing compressive loads by gravity. The holddown device may be temporary for use only during shipping, handling, or storage and may be removed before use. One of potential benefits of the fuel powder is that the possibility of cladding failure by pellet-cladding-mechanical-interaction could be significantly lower than that of hard oxide pellet. Another is the low fabrication cost of vibration packing compared to the complicated sintering process of the oxide pellet.
The porosity, defined as the ratio of the void space volume to the total volume of the material, of the annular metal fuel may range from 0.1 to 0.5. This is an operational porosity that may be exhibited initially by the fuel or that may be achieved after a certain period of irradiation (e.g., after reaching the reactor's nominal operating temperature, after 1 hour at operating temperature, after 1 day, after 1 week, or even after 1 month). The porous nature of the metal fuel provides a benefit in resulting overall thermal conductivity of the fuel rod at operational temperatures over non-porous fuels with helium gaps between the fuel and cladding as the porous structure allows for thermal expansion without significantly affecting the structural integrity of the fuel while also causing a good thermal contact between the fuel and the claddings. The porosity also has another beneficial effect in that it provides void space for fission products to collect without causing the fuel to swell appreciably over time due to the ongoing fission.
The claddings used may be of any material, now known or later developed, suitable for use as a cladding with metal fuel. These may vary depending on the actual species of fuel used, but suitable claddings include stainless steels and ferritic martensitic steels such as those disclosed in Published U.S. Application No. 2017-0292179, titled HIGH TEMPERATURE RADIATION-RESISTANT, FERRITIC-MARTENSITIC STEELS, which application is incorporated by reference for the claddings it discloses. Claddings may also be duplex or triplex layers such as those described in Pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/623,119, titled STEEL-VANADIUM ALLOY CLADDING FOR FUEL ELEMENT, which application is incorporated by reference for the claddings it discloses.
Zirconium alloys such as ZIRLO™ and zircalloy alloys may be used as cladding material. Alternatively, in some embodiments the annular metal fuels utilize claddings that contain no zirconium. When used with a PWR, this removes water-contacting zirconium from the core and, therefore, reduces the possibility of the zirconium-water reaction (with associated hydrogen generation which caused the explosion at the Fukushima crisis) from happening, which can occur as a runaway reaction at high temperatures.
Claddings may be separate components later combined with fuel to create fuel rods or may be co-extruded with or applied to the exterior of the metal fuel. In yet another embodiment, the claddings and/or or fuel may be created using an additive manufacturing process, either separately and then assembled or the cladding and fuel may be created in a single additive manufacturing process as a unitary component.
It should be noted that the fuel rods described above need not be uniform along their length. For example regions of greater or lesser enrichment could be provided along the length of the fuel rod. This could be achieved by providing different annular slugs of fuel or different particulate fuel in the different regions during assembly. Likewise, specific regions could be provided with burnable poisons, other additives, or different types of metal fuels. In addition to different materials, different regions could be provided with different attributes such as different porosities, bulk densities, or different annular slug sizes even if the metal fuel material remains the same.
The fuel assemblies of
The annular metal fuel rods described above may be manufactured by several different methods. Depending on the fuel type, the desired fuel porosity, and other user-selected criteria, certain methods may be more or less suitable.
One method is to manufacture the annular metal fuel and cladding as separate components and then assemble them into a fuel rod. In one embodiment of this method the fuel, the inner cladding and the outer cladding are each made separately and then assembled into one or more segments. If multiple segments are used to obtain the desired length, these segments are then assembled. After assembly, end caps are installed at both ends and the rod is ready for use. Other internal components such as a holddown device and/or a plenum spring may also be included and assembled at this time depending on the design. In an alternative embodiment of this method, the inner and outer claddings may be connected to an end cap and then one or more annuli of metal fuel may be inserted, then the rod may be sealed with the other end cap. Other orders of assembly are also possible. As described above, upon use in a reactor the metal fuel will expand, achieve its target porosity, and eliminate any gaps between the fuel and the claddings, thereby creating a fuel rod with good thermal conductance between the fuel and the claddings.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing or other additive manufacturing techniques may be used to generate one or more components, as mentioned above. In an embodiment, the fuel and claddings may be 3D printed as separate components or the outer cladding-fuel-inner cladding may be 3D printed as a single integrated intermediate component which is then capped to provide the final fuel rod.
A different method involves co-extrusion of at least two components of the fuel rod. For example, the inner cladding and the metal fuel may be co-extruded and then assembled with the outer cladding. Alternatively the outer cladding and the metal fuel may be co-extruded and then assembled with the inner cladding. In yet another embodiment, the three components (inner cladding, fuel and outer cladding) may be co-extruded simultaneously. rods created using the additive manufacturing and co-extrusion methods may or may not rely on the thermal expansion of the fuel to create a good thermal connection between the claddings and the fuel. For example, in an embodiment the manufacturing technique creates rods with metallurgical bonds between one or both claddings and the fuel. In these embodiments, the porosity is useful to relieve the stress that would otherwise be generated by the thermal expansion of the fuel at operational temperatures reducing the requirements on the cladding strength.
A variation on the co-extrusion method is a dual intermediate component manufacture method. This variation is illustrated in
The fuel rods produced by the dual intermediate component co-extrusion method are anticipated to have better performance than those created by some of the other methods described above. The dual intermediate component method, especially when using co-extrusion, creates a closer bond and better contact surface between the fuel and the claddings than achieved with simple assembly methods. This improves the thermal conductance between the fuel and the claddings relative to the other manufacturing methods. It further provides a space (i.e., the gap 514 between the two fuel surfaces of the intermediate components 506, 510) for thermal expansion of the fuel that does not negatively impact the thermal conductance between the fuel and either cladding 502, 508. The porous nature of the metal fuel provides additional benefit by allowing space for fission products to collect.
Yet another manufacturing method is applicable when manufacturing annular metal fuel rods from metal fuel particulate such as U—Zr powder. In this method, the inner and outer claddings are assembled together and then the fuel powder is introduced in the region between the two claddings. The fuel powder may then be packed either through vibration packing or traditional ramming techniques to obtain the desired bulk density and porosity within the fuel. An end cap or caps may then be applied to create the completed fuel rod. Vibration packing may include subjecting the powder within the claddings to vibrations with a selected stroke at a selected frequency for a selected period of time. In one embodiment, the vibration stroke, frequency and time are predetermined to achieve the desired porosity. In an alternative embodiment, the porosity and/or bulk density of powder is monitored and one or more of the vibration stroke, frequency and time are varied until the desired target value(s) are achieved. As mentioned above, a holddown device such as bar, ring, or tube of zirconium or other unreactive metal or material can provide additional compacting forces during the packing process and can minimize the risk of massive relocation of the powder during shipping and handling.
Furthermore, the holddown device 618 may be a screen, porous annular slug, or other device designed to allow gas flow through or around the device allowing fission products to be released from the fuel into a plenum region within the fuel rod, e.g., at the end caps for example.
In addition to those described above, further embodiments are disclosed in the following numbered clauses:
1. A nuclear fuel rod comprising:
an outer cladding;
an inner cladding within the outer cladding, the inner cladding defining a coolant channel;
and a metal fuel between the outer cladding and the inner cladding.
2. The nuclear fuel rod of clause 1, wherein the metal fuel has a porosity from 0.1 to 0.5.
3. The nuclear fuel rod of clause 1 or 2, wherein the metal fuel is selected from uranium, plutonium, a mixture of uranium and plutonium, an alloy of uranium, an alloy of plutonium, or an alloy of uranium and plutonium.
4. The nuclear fuel rod of clause 1, wherein the metal fuel is selected from uranium, plutonium, an alloy of uranium or an alloy of plutonium and has a porosity from 0.1 to 0.5.
5. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-4, wherein the coolant channel extends the length of the fuel rod.
6. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-5 further comprising:
an end cap at each end of the fuel rod such that the metal fuel is retained within the fuel rod.
7. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-6 further comprising:
at least one biasing element between the outer cladding and the inner cladding that applies a bias force on the porous metal fuel.
8. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-7, wherein the metal fuel includes at least one annulus of solid metal fuel between the inner cladding and the outer cladding.
9. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-8, wherein the metal fuel achieves the porosity of from 0.1 to 0.5 after one month of irradiation.
10. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-9, wherein the metal fuel is a quantity of metal fuel powder packed into a space between the inner cladding and the outer cladding.
11. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-10, wherein the metal fuel is selected from a U—Zr alloy, a U—Zr—Nb alloy, a U—Pu—Zr alloy, a U—Pu—Mo alloy, a U—Pu—Nb alloy, and a U—Pu—Ti alloy.
12. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-11, wherein the metal fuel is an alloy of uranium and one or more of Cr, Ti, V, Ni, Nb, Al, Si, and Mo.
13. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-12, wherein the outer cladding has a cross-sectional shape selected from square, circle, rectangular, hexagonal, octagonal, polygonal, and lobed.
14. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-13, wherein an exterior surface of the nuclear fuel rod has a helical twist along its length.
15. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-14, wherein the coolant channel has a cross-sectional shape selected from square, circle, rectangular, hexagonal, octagonal, polygonal, and lobed.
16. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-15, wherein the coolant channel is provided with an internal structure.
17. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-16, wherein the coolant channel is provided with an internal structure that is helically twisted along the length of the rod.
18. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-17, wherein at least one of the inner cladding and outer cladding is made of steel.
19. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-18, wherein at least one of the inner cladding and the outer cladding is made of zirconium or a zirconium alloy.
20. The nuclear fuel rod of any of clauses 1-19, wherein at least one liner is provided between the inner cladding and the metal fuel or the outer cladding and the metal fuel or both.
21. A nuclear fuel assembly for use in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) comprising:
a frame shaped and configured to a core of the PWR; and
a plurality of fuel rods within the frame;
wherein at least one of the plurality of fuel rods is a fuel rod of clause 1.
22. The nuclear fuel assembly of clause 21 wherein the at least one of the plurality of fuel rods is a fuel rod of at least one of clauses 2-20.
23. A pressurized water reactor (PWR) containing at least one nuclear fuel rod assembly of clause 21 or 22.
24. A method for manufacturing an annular nuclear fuel rod comprising:
creating a first intermediate component, the first intermediate component including an outer cladding tube having an interior surface and an exterior surface and having a first layer of metal fuel on the interior surface;
creating a second intermediate component, the second intermediate component including an inner cladding tube having an interior surface and an exterior surface and having a second layer of metal fuel on the exterior surface; and assembling the first intermediate component with the second intermediate component to obtain the annular nuclear fuel rod.
25. The method of clause 24, further comprising:
capping the nuclear fuel rod on at least one end of the nuclear fuel rod.
26. The method of clause 24 or 25, wherein creating the first intermediate component further comprises:
co-extruding outer cladding material and metal fuel together to create the first intermediate component.
27. The method of any of clauses 24-26, wherein creating the first intermediate component further comprises:
depositing the outer cladding material on porous metal fuel or the metal fuel onto the outer cladding tube to create the first intermediate component.
28. The method of any of clauses 24-27, wherein creating the second intermediate component further comprises:
co-extruding inner cladding material and metal fuel together to create the second intermediate component.
29. The method of any of clauses 24-28, wherein creating the second intermediate component further comprises:
depositing the inner cladding material on metal fuel or the metal fuel onto the inner cladding tube to create the second intermediate component.
30. The method of any of clauses 24-29, wherein the metal fuel achieves a porosity of from 0.1-0.5 only after irradiation.
31. The method of any of clauses 24-30, wherein at least one of the first layer of metal fuel and the second layer of metal fuel has an initial porosity of from 0.1-0.5.
32. A method for manufacturing an annular nuclear fuel rod comprising:
creating a first intermediate component, the first intermediate component including an inner cladding tube within an outer cladding tube defining an annular space between the inner cladding tube and the outer cladding tube;
placing a powder of metal fuel in the annular space between the inner and outer cladding tubes;
packing the powder of metal fuel in the annular space between the inner and outer cladding tubes until a target porosity in the metal fuel is achieved; and
capping the packed powder within the annular space between the inner and outer cladding tubes.
33. The method of clause 32, wherein packing the powder of metal fuel further comprises: includes vibrating the powder for a period of time at a selected frequency.
34. The method of clause 32 or 33, wherein vibrating the powder metal fuel further comprises:
subjecting the powder to a predetermined vibration stroke at a predetermined frequency for a predetermined period of time.
35. The method of any of clauses 32-34, wherein packing the powder of metal fuel further comprises:
monitoring the porosity and/or bulk density of the powder while packing the powder.
36. The method of any of clauses 32-35, wherein vibrating the powder metal fuel further comprises:
varying one or more of the vibration stroke, frequency, and time until the desired target porosity is achieved.
37. A method for manufacturing an annular nuclear fuel rod of any one of clauses 1-20 comprising:
creating a first intermediate component, the first intermediate component including an outer cladding tube having an interior surface and an exterior surface and having a first layer of metal fuel on the interior surface;
creating a second intermediate component, the second intermediate component including an inner cladding tube having an interior surface and an exterior surface and having a second layer of metal fuel on the exterior surface; and
assembling the first intermediate component with the second intermediate component to obtain the annular nuclear fuel rod.
38. The method of clause 37, further comprising:
capping the nuclear fuel rod on at least one end of the nuclear fuel rod.
39. The method of clause 37 or 38, wherein creating the first intermediate component further comprises:
co-extruding the outer cladding tube and metal fuel.
40. The method of any of clauses 37-39, wherein creating the first intermediate component further comprises:
depositing outer cladding material on porous metal fuel or depositing the metal fuel onto the outer cladding tube.
41. The method of any of clauses 37-40, wherein creating the second intermediate component further comprises:
co-extruding inner cladding material and metal fuel.
42. The method of any of clauses 37-41, wherein creating the second intermediate component further comprises:
depositing inner cladding material on metal fuel or depositing the metal fuel onto the inner cladding tube.
43. The method of any of clauses 37-42, wherein the metal fuel achieves a porosity of from 0.1-0.5 only after irradiation.
44. The method of any of clauses 37-43, wherein at least one of the first layer of metal fuel and the second layer of metal fuel has an initial porosity of from 0.1-0.5.
45. A method for manufacturing an annular nuclear fuel rod of any one of clauses 1-20 comprising:
creating a first intermediate component, the first intermediate component including an inner cladding tube within an outer cladding tube defining an annular space between the inner cladding tube and the outer cladding tube;
placing a metal fuel powder in the annular space between the inner and outer cladding tubes;
packing the metal fuel powder in the annular space between the inner and outer cladding tubes until a target porosity in the metal fuel is achieved; and
capping the packed metal fuel powder within the annular space between the inner and outer cladding tubes.
46. The method of clause 45, wherein packing the metal fuel powder further comprises:
vibrating the metal fuel powder for a period of time at a selected frequency.
47. The method of clause 45 or 46, wherein vibrating the metal fuel powder further comprises:
subjecting the metal fuel powder to a predetermined vibration stroke at a predetermined frequency for a predetermined period of time.
48. The method of any of clauses 45-47, wherein packing the metal fuel powder further comprises:
varying one or more of the vibration stroke, frequency, and time until the desired target porosity is achieved.
It will be clear that the systems and methods described herein are well adapted to attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those inherent therein. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the methods and systems within this specification may be implemented in many manners and as such are not to be limited by the foregoing exemplified embodiments and examples. In this regard, any number of the features of the different embodiments described herein may be combined into one single embodiment and alternate embodiments having fewer than or more than all of the features herein described are possible.
While various embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, various changes and modifications may be made which are well within the scope contemplated by the present disclosure. Numerous other changes may be made which will readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the art and which are encompassed in the spirit of the disclosure.
The present application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/609,831, titled “Annular Metal Nuclear Fuel and Methods of Manufacturing the Same”, filed Dec. 22, 2017, which application is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62609831 | Dec 2017 | US |