1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a method for the prevention of damage to oil and gas wells, and, more specifically, to the prevention of damage to the well casing from critical annular pressure buildup.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The physics of annular pressure buildup (APB) and associated loads exerted on well casing and tubing strings have been experienced since the first multi-string completions. APB has drawn the focus of drilling and completion engineers in recent years. In modern well completions, all of the factors contributing to APB have been pushed to the extreme, especially in deep water wells.
APB can be best understood with reference to a subsea wellhead installation. In oil and gas wells it is not uncommon that a section of formation must be isolated from the rest of the well. This is typically achieved by bringing the top of the cement column from the subsequent string up inside the annulus above the previous casing shoe. While this isolates the formation, bringing the cement up inside the casing shoe effectively blocks the safety valve provided by nature's fracture gradient. Instead of leaking off at the shoe, any pressure buildup will be exerted on the casing, unless it can be bled off at the surface. Most land wells and many offshore platform wells are equipped with wellheads that provide access to every casing annulus and an observed pressure increase can be quickly bled off. Unfortunately, most subsea wellhead installations do not have access to each casing annulus and often a sealed annulus is created. Because the annulus is sealed, the internal pressure can increase significantly in reaction to an increase in wellbore temperature.
Most casing strings and displaced fluids are installed at near-static temperatures. On the sea floor the temperature is around 34° F. The production fluids are drawn from “hot” formations that dissipate and heat the displaced fluids as the production fluid is drawn towards the surface. When the displaced fluid is heated, it expands and a substantial pressure increase may result. This condition is commonly present in all producing wells, but is most evident in deep water wells. Deep water wells are likely to be vulnerable to APB because of the cold temperature of the displaced fluid, in contrast to elevated temperature of the production fluid during production. Also, subsea wellheads do not provide access to all the annulus and any pressure increase in a sealed annulus cannot be bled off. Sometimes the pressure can become so great as to collapse the inner string or even rupture the outer string, thereby destroying the well.
One previous solution to the problem of APB was to take a joint in the outer string casing and mill a section off so as to create a relatively thin wall. However, it was very difficult to determine the pressure at which the milled wall would fail or burst. This could create a situation in which an overly weakened wall would burst when the well was being pressure tested. In other cases, the milled wall could be too strong, causing the inner string to collapse before the outer string bursts.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,675,898, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, an alternative design was shown which comprised a casing coupling modified to include at least one receptacle for housing a modular “burst disk” assembly. The burst disk assembly was designed to fail at a predetermined pressure and was compensated for temperature. The disk was designed to intentionally fail when the trapped annular pressure threatened the integrity of either the inner or outer casing. The design also allowed for the burst disk assembly to be installed on location or before pipe shipment.
Despite the advantages offered by the improved burst disk design, a need continues to exist for further improvements in automatic pressure relief systems of the type under consideration.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a modified casing coupling with a pressure relief feature that will hold a sufficient internal pressure to allow for pressure testing of the casing but which will reliably release when the pressure reaches a predetermined level.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a modified casing coupling that will release at a pressure less than the collapse pressure of the inner string and less than the burst pressure of the outer string.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a modified casing coupling that is relatively inexpensive to manufacture, easy to install, and is reliable in a fixed, relatively narrow range of pressures.
The above objects are achieved by creating a modified casing coupling which can be used in a casing string of the type used on an offshore well having a subsea well head connected by a subsea conduit to a floating work station, where the subsea well head is connected to a plurality of casing strings located in a borehole below the subsea well head and defining at least one casing annulus therebetween.
The modified casing coupling houses a pressure relief valve for relieving annular pressure between at least selected casing strings under predetermined pressure buildup conditions. The modified casing coupling has sidewalls which define an interior and an exterior of the coupling. The receptacle housing also includes a through bore with opposing end openings, the through bore communicating with the interior of the modified casing coupling at one end opening thereof and with an area surrounding the modified casing coupling at an opposite end opening thereof.
The through bore includes a ball seat adjacent one end opening thereof which receives a sealing ball, and wherein the ball is urged in the direction of the ball seat by a tensioning element located within the through bore which exerts a given amount of tension on the ball. The ball is exposed to annular pressure trapped between successive lengths of well casing located in the well borehole. The through bore can be arranged to communicate with the interior of the modified casing coupling by a port provided in a sidewall of the modified casing coupling. The amount of tension exerted on the ball by the tensioning element is selected to allow the ball to move off the ball seat and to thereby release trapped annular pressure between the selected casing strings once a predetermined annulus pressure is reached.
The tensioning element used in the pressure relief valve can conveniently be selected from the group consisting of coil springs, washers, Belleville spring washers and combinations thereof. The ball seat can be provided at either end of the through bore, whereby the pressure relief valve can be configured to operate in either of two directions, depending upon which ball seat receives a sealing ball. In other words, the modified casing receptacle can be configured to accept both internal and external pressure type valve bodies.
A method is also shown for the prevention of damage in offshore oil and gas wells due to trapped annular pressure between successive lengths of well casing. A modified casing coupling, as previously described, is installed within at least a selected casing string and is provided with the previously described pressure relief valve. The through bore of the pressure relief valve communicates with the interior of the modified casing coupling at one end opening thereof and with an area surrounding the modified casing coupling at an opposite end opening thereof. The through bore is provided with the ball seat and sealing ball as previously described. The ball is exposed to annular pressure trapped between successive lengths of well casing located in the well borehole. By properly selecting the amount of tension which the tensioning element exerts on the sealing ball, the ball can be allowed to move off the ball seat to thereby release trapped annular pressure between the selected casing strings once a predetermined annulus pressure is reached. The pressure at which the pressure relief valve opens is specified by the user, and is compensated for temperature. The valve opens when the trapped annular pressure threatens the integrity of either the inner or outer casing.
Additional objects, features and advantages will be apparent in the written description which follows.
Turning first to
As will be familiar to those skilled in the relevant arts, a rotary drill is typically used to bore through subterranean formations of the earth to form the borehole 318. As the rotary drill bores through the earth, a drilling fluid, known in the industry as a “mud,” is circulated through the borehole 318. The mud is usually pumped from the surface through the interior of the drill pipe. By continuously pumping the drilling fluid through the drill pipe, the drilling fluid can be circulated out the bottom of the drill pipe and back up to the well surface through the annular space between the wall of the borehole 318 and the drill pipe. The mud is used to help lubricate and cool the drill bit and facilitates the removal of cuttings as the borehole 318 is drilled. Also, the hydrostatic pressure created by the column of mud in the hole prevents blowouts which would otherwise occur due to the high pressures encountered within the wellbore. To prevent a blowout caused by the high pressure, heavy weight is put into the mud so the mud has a hydrostatic pressure greater than any pressure anticipated in the drilling.
Different types of mud must be used at different depths because the deeper the borehole 318, the higher the pressure. For example, the pressure at 2,500 ft. is much higher than the pressure at 1,000 ft. The mud used at 1,000 ft. would not be heavy enough to use at a depth of 2,500 ft. and a blowout would occur. In subsea wells the pressure at deep depths is tremendous. Consequently, the weight of the mud at the extreme depths must be particularly heavy to counteract the high pressure in the borehole 318. The problem with using a particularly heavy mud is that if the hydrostatic pressure of the mud is too heavy, then the mud will start encroaching or leaking into the formation, creating a loss of circulation of the mud. Because of this, the same weight of mud cannot be used at 1,000 feet that is to be used at 2,500 feet. For this reason, it is generally not possible to put a single casing string all the way down to the desired final depth of the borehole 318. The weight of the mud necessary to reach the great depth would be too great.
To enable the use of different types of mud, different strings of casing are employed to eliminate the wide pressure gradient found in the borehole 318. To start, the borehole 318 is drilled to a depth where a heavier mud is required, for example around 1000 ft. When this happens, a casing string is inserted into the borehole 318. A cement slurry is pumped into the casing and a plug of fluid, such as drilling mud or water, is pumped behind the cement slurry in order to force the cement up into the annulus between the exterior of the casing and the borehole 318. Typically, hydraulic cements, particularly Portland cements, are used to cement the well casing within the borehole 318. The cement slurry is allowed to set and harden to hold the casing in place. The cement also provides zonal isolation of the subsurface formations and helps to prevent sloughing or erosion of the borehole 318.
After the first casing is set, the drilling continues until the borehole 318 is again drilled to a depth where a heavier mud is required and the required heavier mud would start encroaching and leaking into the formation. Again, a casing string is inserted into the borehole 318, for example around 2,500 feet, and a cement slurry is allowed to set and harden to hold the casing in place as well as provide zonal isolation of the subsurface formations, and help prevent sloughing or erosion of the borehole 318.
Another reason multiple casing strings may be used in a bore hole is to isolate a section of formation from the rest of the well. To accomplish this, the borehole 318 is drilled through a formation or section of the formation that needs to be isolated and a casing string is set by bringing the top of the cement column from the subsequent string up inside the annulus above the previous casing shoe to isolate that formation. This may have to be done a number of times, depending on how many formations need to be isolated. By bringing the cement up inside the annulus above the previous casing shoe the fracture gradient of the shoe is blocked. Because of the blocked casing shoe, pressure is prevented from leaking off at the shoe and any pressure buildup will be exerted on the casing. Sometimes this excessive pressure buildup can be bled off at the surface or a blowout preventor (BOP) can be attached to the annulus.
However, a subsea wellhead typically has an outer housing secured to the sea floor and an inner wellhead housing received within the outer wellhead housing. During the completion of an offshore well, the casing and tubing hangers are lowered into supported positions within the wellhead housing through a BOP stack installed above the housing. Following completion of the well, the BOP stack is replaced by a Christmas tree having suitable valves for controlling the production of well fluids. The casing hanger is sealed off with respect to the housing bore and the tubing hanger is sealed off with respect to the casing hanger or the housing bore, so as to effectively form a fluid bather in the annulus between the casing and tubing strings and the bore of the housing above the tubing hanger. After the casing hanger is positioned and sealed off, a casing annulus seal is installed for pressure control. If the seal is on a surface well head, often the seal can have a port that communicates with the casing annulus. However, in a subsea wellhead housing, there is a large diameter low pressure housing and a smaller diameter high pressure housing. Because of the high pressure, the high pressure housing must be free of any ports for safety. Once the high pressure housing is sealed off, there is no way to have a hole below the casing hanger for blow out preventor purposes. There are only solid annular members with no means to relieve excessive pressure buildup.
The present invention is directed toward improvements in APRS systems of the type used to avoid the above described problems caused by APB. APB mitigation using APRS is a well-specific design task. The example well configuration is shown in
If APB in the 13⅜″×20″ or C annulus is determined to be a concern, primarily due to a high collapse load on the 13⅜″ casing, then the pressure can be relieved by using an outward-venting APRS in either the 20″ or 16″ strings or an inward-acting APRS in the 13⅜″ casing (see
An outward-acting APRS protects the 13⅜″ casing by venting excess pressure in the “burst” direction. Thus, the APRS device should be specified to release pressure before the inner string collapse resistance is exceeded. Ideally, the pressure rating of the APRS device is specified to exceed the outer casing minimum internal yield pressure (MIYP) so it does not interfere with the normal casing design process, but is also lower than the pipe's mechanical rupture rating.
A second way of protecting the 13⅜″ casing from mechanical collapse is to include an inward-acting APRS within the 13⅜″ string. A collapsed 13⅜″ casing could place a non-uniform shock load on the production casing, possibly propagating failure to the inner strings. Rather than risk this catastrophic failure scenario, an inward-acting APRS device could provide a means of equalizing differential collapse pressure across the 13⅜″ prior to reaching the mechanical collapse threshold.
Turning now to
As shown in
As can be seen in
The particular pressure relief valve which makes up a part of the APRS device shown in
In use, the sealing ball 124 is exposed to annular pressure trapped between successive lengths of well casing located in the well borehole. The amount of tension exerted on the ball by the tensioning element (coil spring 122) is selected to allow the ball to move off the ball seat and to thereby release trapped annular pressure between the selected casing strings once a predetermined annulus pressure is reached.
As shown in
As can be seen in
The particular pressure relief valve which makes up a part of the APRS device shown in
Note that the modified casing couplings 136, 136′ can accept either of the two respective valve bodies and valve body components by merely threading the respective valve body within the mating threaded opening provided in the modified casing coupling. This feature provides a “bi-directional” option, without requiring providing an inventory of different types of casing couplings.
An invention has been described with several advantages. The pressure relief function of the modified casing coupling will hold a sufficient internal pressure to allow for pressure testing of the casing and will reliably release when the pressure reaches a predetermined level. This predetermined level is less than collapse pressure of the inner string and less than the burst pressure of the outer string. The modified casing coupling of the invention is relatively inexpensive to manufacture and is reliable in operation. The pressure relief valve used in the modified casing coupling can be provided with a ball seat adjacent either end opening thereof, whereby the pressure relief valve can be operated in either of two directions, depending upon which ball seat receives a sealing ball. The pressure at which the sealing ball releases can be compensated for temperature. The modified casing coupling can be removed from the casing string, repaired, and then reinstalled in a casing string. It can conveniently be serviced at the well site and be pressure tuned at the well site.
While the invention is shown in only two of its forms, it is not thus limited but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
The present application claims priority from a previously filed provisional application Ser. No. 61/767,560, filed Feb. 21, 2013, entitled “Annular Pressure Relief System”, by the same inventors.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2178845 | Baker | Nov 1939 | A |
2761468 | Thatcher | Sep 1956 | A |
3366182 | Solum | Jan 1968 | A |
3417822 | Howell | Dec 1968 | A |
3572372 | Moore | Mar 1971 | A |
3827486 | Hall | Aug 1974 | A |
3882935 | Calhoun | May 1975 | A |
4286662 | Page, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4446886 | Taylor et al. | May 1984 | A |
4582149 | Slaughter, Jr. | Apr 1986 | A |
4590957 | McFarlane | May 1986 | A |
4750510 | Short, III | Jun 1988 | A |
5020600 | Coronado | Jun 1991 | A |
5109925 | Stepp et al. | May 1992 | A |
5161738 | Wass | Nov 1992 | A |
5341883 | Ringgenberg | Aug 1994 | A |
5411097 | Manke et al. | May 1995 | A |
6095247 | Streich et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6176311 | Ryan | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6293346 | Patel | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6450263 | Schwendemann | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457528 | Staudt | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6675898 | Staudt | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7048059 | Adams et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
8066074 | Maskos et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8353351 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8607818 | Monroe et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010022225 | Burris et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20040238178 | Laureano et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050189107 | McVay et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20110114333 | Fenton | May 2011 | A1 |
20120273226 | Hebert et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140231092 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61767560 | Feb 2013 | US |