1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to a wellhead apparatus, and in particular to an annulus isolation valve for use with a tubing hanger installed inside subsea wellhead.
2. Description of the Related Art
Tubing hangers are employed in subsea wellheads used in, for example, oil and gas wells. The tubing hanger supports the tubing, or “string”, which extends down into the production zone of the well. The process of installing a tubing hanger into a wellhead generally involves positioning the tubing hanger on a landing seat in the wellhead using, for example, a running tool attached to the tubing hanger.
For a tubing hanger installed inside a wellhead, an annulus passage is generally used for monitoring pressure or communicating fluid to and from the annulus below the tubing hanger during installation of the tubing hanger (well completion) and throughout the life of a well. After well completion and before installation of the Christmas tree above the wellhead, all flow passages, including the annulus bore at the tubing hanger, must be sealed off to provide a temporary safety barrier so that the blowout preventer (“BOP”) connected to the wellhead during completion can be removed.
Traditionally the temporary barriers of the production and annulus passages of the tubing hanger are wireline plugs to be removed after the Christmas tree has been installed. Alternatively, annulus isolation valves installed at the annulus bore of the tubing hanger can eliminate at least some of the operations associated with use of the wireline plugs, including, for example, setting and removing the wireline plugs. Additionally, employing annulus isolation valves can allow the use of a monobore riser for Christmas tree installation, because the passage for annulus wireline plug retrieval is no longer required.
The challenges for using annulus isolation valves inside tubing hangers include space limitation, reliability, decreased flow rate and particle size limits imposed by decreased size of flow passages through the valves, added cost and inconvenience of employing wireline tools to open and/or close the valves, and potential flow erosion of sealing surfaces. The present disclosure is directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of, one or more of the issues set forth above.
An embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to an annulus isolation valve. The annulus isolation valve comprises a valve actuation bore having a first longitudinal axis and a flow passage capable of providing fluid communication between an upper annulus and a lower annulus. The flow passage comprising a first flow path and a portion of the valve actuation bore. Further, the first flow path has a second longitudinal axis that is different from the first longitudinal axis. The annulus isolation valve further includes a plug gate positioned in the valve actuation bore. The plug gate is capable of moving between an open position and a closed position. The plug gate is configured so that in the open position it allows fluid communication between the upper annulus and the lower annulus. In the closed position, the plug gate is configured to block fluid communication between the upper annulus and the lower annulus. The annulus isolation valve further includes a biasing mechanism positioned in the valve actuation bore. The biasing mechanism is physically coupled to the plug gate so that an actuation force applied to the biasing mechanism is capable of moving the plug gate into the open position. The biasing mechanism further is capable of forcing the plug gate into the closed position when the actuation force is not applied.
Another embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a wellhead assembly. The wellhead assembly comprises a tubing hanger positioned in the wellhead assembly, the tubing hanger comprising an annulus isolation valve. The wellhead assembly further comprises a tubing string extending down-hole from the tubing hanger, the tubing string comprising a lower annulus. A production flow configuration extends up-hole from the tubing hanger, the production flow configuration comprising an upper annulus. The annulus isolation valve comprises a valve actuation bore having a first longitudinal axis and a flow passage capable of providing fluid communication between an upper annulus and a lower annulus. The flow passage comprising a first flow path and a portion of the valve actuation bore. Further, the first flow path has a second longitudinal axis that is different from the first longitudinal axis. The annulus isolation valve further includes a plug gate positioned in the valve actuation bore. The plug gate is capable of moving between an open position and a closed position. The plug gate is configured so that in the open position it allows fluid communication between the upper annulus and the lower annulus. In the closed position, the plug gate is configured to block fluid communication between the upper annulus and the lower annulus. The annulus isolation valve further includes a biasing mechanism positioned in the valve actuation bore. The biasing mechanism is physically coupled to the plug gate so that an actuation force applied to the biasing mechanism is capable of moving the plug gate into the open position. The biasing mechanism further is capable of forcing the plug gate into the closed position when the actuation force is not applied.
While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The present disclosure is directed to an annulus isolation valve having a dual bore configuration. The annulus isolation valve of the present disclosure may exhibit one or more of the following advantages, including: increased flow rates, improved particle passage, improved reliability for valve closure, the ability to be operated by devices in a tree or in a running tool and the ability to allow secondary operations to both open and close.
The flow passage 104 comprises a first flow path 110 and a portion of the valve actuation bore 102, which as illustrated in
As shown in
A plug gate 114 can be positioned in the valve actuation bore 102. The plug gate 114 can be capable of moving between an open position, shown in
Referring to
An inlet 134 can provide fluid flow to the flow passage 104 of the annulus isolation valve 100. The inlet can be designed to be symmetrical in shape and oriented in a tangential direction to the flow through the lower annulus 108. It is thought that this orientation may help to reduce erosion of the inlet 134 by directing the opposing flows to meet, as illustrated by the flow arrows in
As illustrated in
Any suitable biasing mechanisms can be employed. An embodiment of the biasing mechanism can include a shaft 118 around which a spring 120 is positioned. The spring 120 can be positioned between a platform 122, which is fixed in position in the valve actuation bore 102, and a cap 124. A valve actuation mechanism (not shown) can be employed to force the plug gate 114 from the closed position, as shown in
A secondary method for closing the annulus isolation valve will now be described. In this method, a sealing stab (not shown) can be installed at the top of the annulus flow bore 104 to isolate the upper annulus 106 from the lower annulus 108. In this manner, a higher pressure from below the hanger can be introduced that results in a sufficient force at the middle seal 138 to push the plug gate 114 upward. The presence of the lower annulus pressure can keep the plug gate 114 in the closed position. Similarly, pressure from the upper annulus 106 can be employed to move the plug gate 114 downward from closed to open, which can provide a secondary opening mechanism.
In an embodiment, cap 124 can act directly as an interface for the actuator mechanism. In an alternative embodiment, the actuator interface may include components, in addition to cap 124, so that the cap 124 does not directly contact the actuator mechanism.
Other suitable biasing mechanisms can also be employed, such as, for example, a mechanism that applies a biasing force to the plug gate 114 via hydraulic pressure. One of ordinary skill in the art would be capable of making and using such a biasing mechanism given the teachings of the present disclosure.
Any suitable actuation mechanism can be employed to open the annulus isolation valve 100. In an embodiment, the actuation mechanism can be external of the tubing hanger. Examples of suitable actuation mechanisms can include a rod or hollow sleeve designed to apply the appropriate force to the biasing mechanism 116, or a hydraulic means for applying actuation force.
One or more seals can be employed in the annulus isolation valve 100. The seals can be positioned in any suitable manner. In an embodiment, the seals can be positioned to provide the desired sealing of the valve actuation bore 102 and to protect the seals themselves from damage, due to, for example exposure to high flow rates and/or high fluid pressures. This can allow the valve to be opened under pressure from the lower annulus 108 while preventing or reducing damage to the seals.
In an embodiment, the seals can be positioned to protect the sealed areas, including the spring 120, from leakage and debris. For example, as illustrated in
Additionally, plug gate 114 can comprise a resilient seal 130 and a blowout resistant seal 132. The seals 130 and 132 can be positioned so that as the plug gate 114 is forced down through the valve actuation bore 102, the resilient seal 130 is exposed to the lower annulus 108 before the blowout resistant seal 132, which continues to seal the valve actuation bore 102. The blowout resistant seal 132 is positioned so that as the plug gate 114 continues to be forced down through the valve actuation bore 102, the blow out resistant seal 132 can be positioned in openings 134 and exposed to the lower annulus 108 while the plug gate 114 constrains fluid flow from the lower annulus 108 into the gate flow path 112. By constraining the flow until the blow out resistant seal 132 moves to a safe distance from the high velocity flow field, damage to the blow out resistant seal 132 can be reduced. The movement of the blowout resistant seal 132 as it exits the valve actuation bore 102 may be opposite to the fluid pressure, which may tend to force the plug gate 114 in the up-hole direction.
In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the annulus isolation valves can be employed in any type of subsea well, including, for example, hydrocarbon production wells, such as oil and natural gas wells.
Tubing hanger 115 is positioned in the wellhead assembly 140. The tubing hanger 115 comprising an annulus isolation valve 100 of the present application. In an embodiment, the tubing hanger 115 can comprise a plurality of annulus isolation valves 100. A tubing string 144 extends down-hole from the tubing hanger 115. The production casing (not shown) and the tubing string 144 below the tubing hanger 115 form lower annulus 108. A production flow configuration, which can include, for example, a subsea tree (not shown), can extend up-hole from the tubing hanger 115. The production flow configuration can comprise an upper annulus 106, as shown in
Although various embodiments have been shown and described, the disclosure is not so limited and will be understood to include all such modifications and variations as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.
The present disclosure claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/090,462, filed Aug. 20, 2008, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/090,000, filed Aug. 19, 2008, both of which applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4869318 | Kellett | Sep 1989 | A |
5207275 | Strattan et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211243 | Strattan et al. | May 1993 | A |
5687794 | Watkins et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5769162 | Bartlett et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778918 | McLelland | Jul 1998 | A |
6164375 | Carisella | Dec 2000 | A |
6729392 | DeBerry et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6840323 | Fenton et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7219741 | Fenton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7407011 | Kent | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20060260799 | Broussard | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2009/054341. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100139910 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61090462 | Aug 2008 | US | |
61090000 | Aug 2008 | US |