The present invention relates to the control of ants and in particular to preventing ants from reaching desserts residing on a table.
Ants of various varieties are common in both rural and urban areas. In many areas, leaving a dessert remnant on a table, counter, or any location for a length of time, for example, overnight, results in an ant trail to the dessert remnant. Once the ants have found a dessert, they frequently return and quickly become a nuisance and are particularly annoying during hot, cold, or rainy weather when they are often actively seeking shelter. Ants may additionally create health issues. Ants also often spoil outdoor outings by invading dessert arranged on a picnic table or the like. Such invasions may be even more common in wet or other inclimate weather.
Various designs have been proposed to prevent access to bowls, tables, and the like to ants. Some simple designs include a single simple moat containing a liquid to block the ants, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,125,790, U.S. Pat. No. 5,165,365, U.S. Pat. No. 5,113,798, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,966,099. Unfortunately, a single moat has not proven effective to blocking ants. Other more complicated designs include two or more moats separated by various features in an attempt to block the ants, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,253,609, but these have amounted to disjoint obstacles which the ants have addressed as separate and independent obstacles and overcome as they have overcome a single moat.
Further, known designs are often delegated to utility bowls because of the awkward and/or overly complex appearance, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,253,609. Such designs are not acceptable for many occasions, for example, serving plates or table, where appearance is important.
Therefore, a need remains for an effective obstacle having an attractive design to prevent ants from reaching dessert.
The present invention addresses the above and other needs by providing a joint obstacle to ants which is formed from two or more moats containing a liquid such as water, or a water and dish soap mixture, spaced closely apart. The moats surround a table or serving plate used for carrying dessert. The moats are separated by a short land about the same width as the moats. By spacing the moats closely apart, the ants reject a path across the second moat, thereby preventing the ants from reaching the dessert.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided an ant resistant table. The ant resistant table includes a table top for carrying dessert and a base below the table top. The base includes a base bottom for residing on a horizontal surface, an outer edge of the base, a vertical support portion of the base providing support to the table top, and a horizontal top surface portion of the base between the outer edge and the vertical support portion and forming a closed path containing the vertical support portion. A joint obstacle resides on the horizontal top surface between the outer edge and the vertical support portion. The joint obstacle includes a first land, a first moat, a second land, and a second moat. The first land resides in the horizontal top surface portion against the outer edge and forms a closed path containing the vertical support portion and has a width of approximately ⅜ inches. The first moat resides in the horizontal top surface portion and inside and against the first land and forms a closed path containing the vertical support portion and has a width of approximately ⅜ inches. The second land resides on the horizontal top surface portion inside and against the first moat and forms a closed path containing the vertical support portion and has a width of approximately ⅜ inches. The second moat resides in the horizontal top surface portion and inside and against the second land and forms a closed path containing the vertical support portion and having a width of approximately ⅜ inches. The joint obstacle includes a combination of the first moat, the first land, and the second moat, and causes the ant to reject a path across the second moat.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided an ant resistant table comprising an ant resistant pedestal serving plate. The ant resistant pedestal serving plate includes a table top, a base, and a pedestal. The table top is for carrying dessert and has a diameter of approximately ten inches. The base is below the table top and has a diameter of approximately six inches and includes: a base bottom for residing on a horizontal surface; an outer edge; a vertical support portion providing support to the table top; and a horizontal top surface portion between the outer edge and the vertical support portion and forming a closed path containing the vertical support portion. The pedestal extends upward from the vertical support portion and vertically supports the table top approximately six inches above the horizontal surface and is approximately 1.5 inches in diameter near the base and approximately one inch in diameter near the table top. The base further includes a joint obstacle including a combination of the first moat, the first land, and the second moat, and causes ants to reject a path across the second moat.
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more apparent from the following more particular description thereof, presented in conjunction with the following drawings wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding components throughout the several views of the drawings.
The following description is of the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out the invention. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of describing one or more preferred embodiments of the invention. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the claims.
A side perspective view of an ant resistant table 10 according to the present invention is shown in
A common example of the ant resistant table 10 is a pedestal serving plate. Such pedestal serving plate commonly has a top diameter D1, a height H, and a base diameter D2. The diameters D1 and D2 are generally approximately ten inches and approximately six inches, and the height H is generally approximately six inches. The pedestal 14 is approximately 1½ inches in diameter near the base 16 and approximately one inch in diameter near the top 12.
A cross-sectional view of a first embodiment of a joint obstacle 18a on the horizontal top surface portion 16a of the ant resistant table 10 is shown in
The joint obstacle 18a presents a combination of obstacles (the moats 24a and 24b), and by spacing the moats closely together, the ants reject a path across the second moat, thereby preventing the ants from reaching the dessert. Known ant resistant tables either include only a single moat which is not effective, or multiple obstacles which either are ineffective or create an unacceptable appearance. The present invention utilizes the inventor's discovery that ants reject a path across closely spaced moats. While the actual decision process executed by the ants is unknown, the ant decision process has been observed to reject attempting to cross a second moat immediately after crossing a first moat.
A cross-sectional view of a second embodiment a joint obstacle 18b according to the present invention is shown in
A cross-sectional view of a third embodiment a joint obstacle 18c according to the present invention is shown in
A cross-sectional view of a fourth embodiment a joint obstacle 18d according to the present invention is shown in
While the invention herein disclosed has been described by means of specific embodiments and applications thereof, numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention set forth in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D105812 | Siekert | Aug 1937 | S |
D127800 | Barrie | Jun 1941 | S |
D190668 | Bliss | Jun 1961 | S |
3176676 | Caldwell | Apr 1965 | A |
3441003 | Du Mond et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3664304 | Carter | May 1972 | A |
D269386 | Khider | Jun 1983 | S |
4395015 | Reardon | Jul 1983 | A |
4833999 | Rhoades | May 1989 | A |
4953506 | Sanders | Sep 1990 | A |
4966099 | Arney | Oct 1990 | A |
5069166 | Ahuna | Dec 1991 | A |
5113798 | Rera | May 1992 | A |
5165365 | Thompson | Nov 1992 | A |
5253609 | Partelow et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5372063 | Berg | Dec 1994 | A |
D370314 | Pearson-Falcon | May 1996 | S |
6065428 | Fronk | May 2000 | A |
6125790 | Breedwell | Oct 2000 | A |
6467843 | Rossborough | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6520114 | Chun | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6735901 | Bellehumeur | May 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100258041 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |