1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a microwave antenna. More particularly, the invention relates to an antenna adapter enabling simplified microwave antenna feed interface configuration and/or exchange.
2. Description of Related Art
A microwave antenna may be coupled to a wide range of signal generating and/or processing equipment, according to the end user's requirements, each with a different adapter and/or interface requirement.
A microwave antenna may be provided with an adapter assembly for coupling a transceiver or the like to the microwave antenna. The interconnection may be, for example, a direct interconnection or via a waveguide which then couples to the desired signal generating and/or processing equipment.
Microwave antennas may be provided with an interconnection with dual redundant transceivers, one of the transceivers provided as a hot standby to the other to improve the resulting RF system reliability. Alternatively, dual transceivers coupled to a single microwave antenna may be utilized simultaneously, each transceiver operating upon a signal with a different polarity, the signals separated and routed to each transceiver by an Orthomode Transducer (OMT).
Providing microwave antennas in multiple models, each configured for a specific interconnection type and/or provided with elaborate adapter assemblies, can be a significant manufacturing, supply chain, installation and/or ongoing maintenance burden.
Therefore it is an object of the invention to provide an antenna adapter that overcomes limitations in the prior art.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, where like reference numbers in the drawing figures refer to the same feature or element and may not be described in detail for every drawing figure in which they appear and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 13/297,304, titled “Flat Panel Array Antenna” filed Nov. 16, 2011 by Alexander P. Thomson, Claudio Biancotto and Christopher D. Hills, commonly now U.S. Pat. No. 8,558,746 issued Oct. 15, 2013, owned with the present application and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses microwave antennas comprising a corporate waveguide network and cavity couplers provided in stacked layers, resulting in microwave antennas with significantly reduced dimensions compared to conventional reflector dish microwave antennas. Transceivers and the adapters utilized to mate such to these antennas may comprise a significant portion of the resulting assembly.
The inventors have recognized that prior adapters may be overly complex, overly large and/or require more installation steps than necessary.
As shown in
The retention between the base 5 and the adapter seat 10 may be permanent or releasable via access provided for prying and/or biasing the retaining elements 25 free of engagement with the corresponding interlock cavities 35. Alternatively, the retaining elements 25 may be provided as features of the base 5 and the interlock cavities 35 provided on the adapter seat 10 and/or conventional fasteners, such as screws or bolts may be applied. Environmental seals (not shown) may be applied, for example, surrounding the feed bore 20 between the adapter seat 10 and the base 5 and/or around a periphery of the base 5.
The base 5 has a feed aperture 55 aligned coaxial with the feed bore 20 when the base 5 is seated within the adapter seat 10. The feed aperture 55 may have the same cross-section as the feed bore 20, provided for example as a generally rectangular, round or square cross-section, for example as shown in
As demonstrated in
The output ports 70 may be provided with a generally rectangular cross-section, aligned along a length dimension of the coupling cavity 65 generally parallel to the length of the coupling cavity 65. As shown in
Further tuning of the electrical performance of the coupler cavity 65 may be applied, for example, by including tuning features 80 such as an inward projecting septum 85 provided upon, for example, each of the width sidewalls 90 of the coupling cavity, as best demonstrated in
The level of coupling between the feed aperture 55 and each of the output ports 70 may be selected by, for example, applying the output ports 70 aligned symmetrically with a midpoint of the length sidewall 75 of the coupling cavity 65, as demonstrated in
Alternatively, where the output ports 70 are positioned aligned asymmetrically with a midpoint of the length sidewall 75, as demonstrated, for example, in
In further embodiments, for example as shown in
In alternative embodiments, the coupler configurations described herein above may also be applied in adapter embodiments separate from a recessed adapter seat mating configuration. The base 5 has been demonstrated as an element with minimal thickness to highlight the space savings possible. Alternatively, the adapter may include an extended feed aperture waveguide, for example extending the position of the coupler cavity 65 away from the adapter seat 10, closer to input ports 115 of attached transceivers 60 for example as shown schematically in
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the simplified geometry of the coupling cavities 65 may enable a significant simplification of the required layer surface features which may reduce overall manufacturing complexity. For example, the base 5 may be formed cost-effectively with high precision in high volumes via injection molding and/or die-casting technology. One or more separate layers may be applied to arrive at the desired base assembly. For example, as shown in
Where injection molding with a polymer material is used to form the layers, a conductive surface may be applied.
Although the coupling cavities and waveguides are described as generally rectangular, for ease of machining and/or mold separation, corners may be radiused and/or rounded and cavity tapers applied in a trade-off between electrical performance and manufacturing efficiency.
As frequency increases, wavelengths decrease. Therefore, as the desired operating frequency increases, the physical features within the adapter, such as bores, steps, and/or slots become smaller and harder to fabricate. As use of the coupling cavity 65 can simplify the physical features required, one skilled in the art will appreciate that higher operating frequencies are also enabled by the adapter, for example up to 26 GHz, above which the required dimension resolution/feature precision may begin to make fabrication with acceptable tolerances cost prohibitive.
From the foregoing, it will be apparent that the present invention brings to the art a high performance adapter with reduced overall dimensions that is strong, lightweight and may be repeatedly cost efficiently manufactured with a high level of precision.
Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to materials, ratios, integers or components having known equivalents then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus, methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept. Further, it is to be appreciated that improvements and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2573746 | Watson et al. | Nov 1951 | A |
2862728 | Druschel et al. | Dec 1958 | A |
2981948 | Kurtz | Apr 1961 | A |
3157847 | Williams | Nov 1964 | A |
3193830 | Provencher | Jul 1965 | A |
3243818 | Holtzman | Mar 1966 | A |
3281851 | Goebels, Jr. | Oct 1966 | A |
3340534 | Fee | Sep 1967 | A |
3570007 | Whitehead | Mar 1971 | A |
3599216 | Paine et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3701162 | Seaton | Oct 1972 | A |
4121220 | Scillieri et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4429313 | Muhs, Jr. et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4527165 | de Ronde | Jul 1985 | A |
4716415 | Kelly | Dec 1987 | A |
4829309 | Tsukamoto et al. | May 1989 | A |
4857938 | Tsukamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4878060 | Barbier et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4916458 | Goto | Apr 1990 | A |
4949092 | Crail et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4959658 | Collins | Sep 1990 | A |
4985708 | Kelly | Jan 1991 | A |
5010351 | Kelly | Apr 1991 | A |
5019831 | Yee et al. | May 1991 | A |
5086304 | Collins | Feb 1992 | A |
5210543 | Kurtz | May 1993 | A |
5243354 | Stern et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5270721 | Tsukamoto et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5321411 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327150 | Cherrette | Jul 1994 | A |
5337065 | Bonnet et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5512906 | Speciale | Apr 1996 | A |
5541612 | Josefsson | Jul 1996 | A |
5579019 | Uematsu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589843 | Meredith et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5619216 | Park | Apr 1997 | A |
5650793 | Park | Jul 1997 | A |
5831583 | Lagerstedt et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880695 | Brown et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5926147 | Sehm et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6101705 | Wolfson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127985 | Guler | Oct 2000 | A |
6198456 | Le Halle et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201508 | Metzen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225960 | Collins | May 2001 | B1 |
6285335 | Snygg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304228 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6476772 | Smith et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6535173 | Ou | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6624787 | Puzella et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6657599 | Solbach | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6720931 | Michisaka et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731241 | Park et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6796126 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6861996 | Jeong | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6950066 | Hendler et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6977621 | Kelly et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985057 | Lesutis | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7064725 | Shtrikman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079087 | Bateman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7205948 | Krikorian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227508 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7391381 | Wang et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D576344 | Conroy | Sep 2008 | S |
7607942 | Van Swearingen | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7663566 | Engel | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680516 | Lovberg et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7817097 | Margomenos | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7948443 | Bullock et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8010042 | Judd et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8040286 | Matusuo et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20040252073 | Kukita et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050146479 | Stenger et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070152906 | Wong | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080165078 | Song | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090302971 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100066463 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085261 | Baranski | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110074652 | Lewry et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120019424 | Syed et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9639730 | Dec 1996 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sung Chul Kang, International Search Report of Counterpart International Application No. PCT/US12/65425, Mar. 29, 2013, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Korea. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130120089 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13297304 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13677859 | US |