The present invention relates to a method for and apparatus for enabling repeatable accurate alignment of a communication antenna that is attached to antenna brackets without the need for a technician, rigger or climber to come in direct contact with the antenna itself.
Antenna structures are used by cellular communications network/service providers to receive antennas for transmission and reception of radio signals. A typical antenna structure comprises a tower, one or more antenna brackets attached on the tower top, so that one or more antennas are attached on the antenna brackets. Usually, the tower is firstly assembled at the point of installation and then the antenna brackets are mounted on the tower itself. Antennas are attached to the antenna brackets by means of mounting bolts and screws or other securing means, defining a specific horizontal (azimuth) and vertical (tilt) directionality for the transmission and reception of radio signals.
To achieve high network performance, provide high quality radio link transmissions and receptions and ensure high spectrum efficiency, the panel antennas must be aligned with minimum inaccuracy (less than ±1°) to the specified horizontal (azimuth) and vertical (tilt) directionality angles provided by the radio planning process and antenna installation work orders. Accurate alignment of panel antennas is of paramount importance in a competitive wireless communication industry as even small errors in azimuth and tilt alignment (more than ±5° for azimuth and more than ±1° for tilt) can seriously degrade radio network quality. See, for example, the reference paper “Impact of Mechanical Antenna Downtilt on Performance of WCDMA Cellular Network” and also the paper “Impacts of Antenna Azimuth and Tilt Installation Accuracy on UMTS Network Performance” by Bechtel Corp.
Several prior art solutions are currently available for accurate alignment of antennas azimuth and tilt. For example, US20090021447 and US20110225804 describe a device for measuring the orientation of an antenna in three directions, i.e. azimuth, tilt and roll. The device is directly secured to an antenna and displays the measured values for azimuth, tilt and roll, allowing a user to accurately align an antenna to the desired directions. A deficiency of the prior art is that such a device cannot be employed in antenna structures having one or more antennas covered under a radome, due to the fact that antenna accessibility from an antenna technician, rigger or climber is not possible or generally limited (examples of such antenna structures are disclosed in US20050134512A1 & WO2011042226). As a result, the use of the measurement devices described in US20090021447 and US20110225804 are not applicable to serve the purpose of accurate alignment of antenna structures covered under a radome.
Furthermore, due to modern networks' dynamic nature, continuous antenna azimuth and tilt re-adjustment during the lifecycle of a base station site (for one or more antennas) is required; therefore, the antenna brackets, the antennas or the antenna structure itself should be capable to provide the suitable means for facilitating such needs. Each antenna is designed to serve a specific area, namely a cell or sector. Cell direction, i.e. antenna azimuth & tilt, is produced by modeling multiple aspects of radio access technology as well as accounting for radio propagation science by using radio planning tools. The main aim of the radio network planning process is to provide optimum performance for the radio network in terms of coverage, capacity and quality. The network planning process and base station site design criteria vary from cluster to cluster depending upon the dominating factor, which is optimum performance. Said coverage may include defining the coverage areas, service probability and related signal strength; said capacity may include subscriber density and traffic profiles in the coverage region and whole area, availability of the frequency bands, frequency planning methods, and other information such as guard band and frequency band division; said quality is related to radio interference metrics such as signal to noise ratio. Since all radio network performance aspects are fully dynamic, the radio network planning process that selects antenna directionality at installation phase cannot ensure that the selection criteria (i.e. capacity, coverage and quality) will remain the same after a period of time. Usually, the antennas are installed and operated for at least 7 to 10 years or even more. This fact by itself, means that the antenna azimuth and tilt directions must often change during the base station site lifecycle by re-adjustment means. Ideally, antenna azimuth and tilt re-adjustment should be considered at least once every six months for every antenna in the network, especially in urban and heavy urban areas where the demands on capacity and quality of radio base station clusters are continuously shifting.
When antenna system azimuth and tilt re-adjustment is to be performed, such re-adjustment should take place without the need to climb on the tower top, so as to avoid complicated operations of high opex (operational expediture) costs (due to climbing) and also ensuring health and safety at work for antenna technicians, riggers and climbers. It is well known that human exposure on high electromagnetic fields is an issue to be considered by the network service providers for those working in close proximity to radiating antenna systems. Climbing on the tower top in order to set or re-adjust the directionality of antennas is not avoided by use of the devices disclosed in US20090021447 and US20110225804 as they do not provide the means for such operations. However, when such devices are not used, the problem of antennas azimuth and tilt accurate alignment for any directionality re-adjustment by remote operation remains.
In the case where there is a need to satisfy both antenna alignment accuracy and remote re-adjustability (with no climbing) with accuracy, an electromechanical apparatus that performs both actions needs to be deployed. A single pivot axis antenna bracket that offers remote azimuth adjustment by electromechanical means is disclosed in WO2007093689A1. However, a deficiency of such prior art is that such an antenna bracket cannot satisfy the alignment accuracy required by the radio planning process and antenna system installation work orders without use of devices disclosed in US20090021447 and US20110225804. This is due to the fact that the proposed electromechanical system attached on the antenna bracket does not provide absolute azimuth, tilt and roll measurement means. The result of this is that all of the disadvantages introduced by use of US20090021447 and US20110225804 (as described in the previous paragraphs) follow as disadvantages also for apparatus of WO2007093689A1. Furthermore, a single pivot axis antenna system that offers remote azimuth adjustment by electromechanical actuation but also attempts to provide absolute azimuth, tilt and roll measurement means is also disclosed on US20090195467. However, a deficiency of such prior art is that such a solution utilizes an earth gravitational magnetic field sensor which, by default, introduces inaccuracy due to magnetic field disturbances caused from the antenna systems, the antenna brackets and the antenna structure itself (i.e. soft and hard iron effects). Therefore, such a solution, although it offers both antenna system alignment accuracy and remote re-adjustability with accuracy, does not address the issue of high overall accuracy.
The deficiencies exemplary of the apparatus of WO2007093689A1 and US20090195467 are applicable not only in these documents, but also when antenna systems are attached on antenna brackets that utilize more than one pivot axis for horizontal (azimuth) alignment and movement. In a particular example of antenna system directionality, two antennas may need to have the same horizontal direction or the same azimuth angle. In order to align and direct both antenna systems to the same azimuth angle, prior art US20060087476 proposes a dual pivot axis antenna bracket for installation on a triangular tower utilizing antenna sector frames. WO2011042226 (GB2474605) proposes a dual pivot axis antenna bracket for installation on a monopole structure by utilizing a collar. This prior art provides the capability, due to the dual pivot axis antenna bracket attached on the antenna structure, to offer full motion freedom on the antenna system(s) (needed for future horizontal azimuth re-adjustments) by maximizing the allowable antenna system horizontal (azimuth) movement range.
It is the purpose of the present invention to overcome or at least mitigate at least some of the aforementioned disadvantages of the prior art. In particular, it is the purpose of the present invention to propose a method for and apparatus for enabling the accurate, and repeatably accurate, alignment of communication antenna systems that are attached on either single or dual pivot axis antenna brackets, without the need for a technician, rigger or climber to come in direct contact with the antenna system itself.
Aspects and preferable features of the invention are defined by the appended claims.
An example of an antenna alignment apparatus and method according to the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
The antenna structure comprises central portion 100 which is attached to a first antenna bracket mounting formation 200. The first antenna bracket mounting formation 200 is attached to single pivot axis mounting formation 300. The single pivot axis mounting formation 300 is attached to a second antenna bracket mounting formation 400, and the second antenna bracket mounting formation 400 is attached to a panel antenna system 500. The first antenna bracket mounting formation 200 is mounted to the central portion 100 by central top and bottom joints A′ and B′ respectively and is mounted to the single pivot axis mounting formation 300 by central top and bottom joints A′″ and B′″ respectively. The first antenna bracket mounting formation 200 also comprises the joints A″ and B″ that serve the purpose of defining or setting the vertical (tilt) heading of the antenna system with respect to the antenna structure central vertical axis 100′.
The single pivot axis mounting formation 300 is mounted to the first antenna bracket mounting formation 200 by central top and bottom joints C′ and D′ respectively. The single pivot axis mounting formation 300 is mounted to the second antenna bracket mounting formation 400 by central top and bottom joints C′″ and D′″ respectively. The single pivot axis mounting formation 300 also comprises central joints C″ and D″ that define the horizontal (azimuth) directionality of the antenna system (with respect to the perpendicular lines as shown in
The second antenna bracket mounting formation 400 is mounted to the antenna system by central top and bottom joints E″ and F″ respectively. The second antenna bracket mounting formation 400 is mounted to the single pivot axis mounting formation 300 by central top and bottom joints E′ and F′ respectively. In order to position the horizontal (azimuth), vertical (tilt) and adjacent vertical (roll) heading of antenna system 500 a known, pre-calibrated, 3-dimensional position (herein referred to as “home position”) with respect to the antenna structure central vertical axis 100′, the top mounting central joints A′, A′″, C′, C″, C′″, E′ and E″ are placed in line, thus forming a central line A′-E″ 201. This central line 201 is perpendicular to the central vertical axis 100′. The same applies for the bottom mounting central joints B′, B′″, D′, D″, D′″, F′ and F″ which form the central line B′-F″ 202, where this central line 202 is parallel to the central line 201 and perpendicular to the central vertical axis 100′.
Additionally, the top mounting central joints A′, A″, A′, C′, C″, C″, E′ and E″ and the respective bottom mounting central joints B′, B″, B′″, D′, D″, D′″, F′ and F″ are in pairs forming the respective central lines A′-B′ 203, A″-B″ 204, A′″-B′″ 205, C′-D′ 206, C″-D″ 207, C′-D′″ 208, E′-F′ 209 and E″-F″ 210. These central lines are all parallel to the central vertical axis 100′. In this way, the first antenna bracket mounting formation 200 is in line with the single pivot axis mounting formation 300, the single pivot axis mounting formation 300 is in line with the second antenna bracket mounting formation 400 and the second antenna bracket mounting formation 400 is in line with the antenna system 500 and, all together, are absolutely perpendicular to the central vertical axis 100′. Therefore, the horizontal (azimuth), vertical (tilt) and adjacent vertical (roll) heading of the antenna system 500 is at a known, pre-calibrated, 3-dimentional “home position”, with respect to the antenna structure central vertical axis 100′.
In order to align the central bottom mounting joints B′, B′″, D′, D″ that are located on the first antenna bracket mounting formation 200 with the single pivot axis mounting formation 300 up to the pivot axis central mounting joint D″ to points J, K, L, M, the respective lines B′-J, B′″-K, D′-L and D″-M need to be formed in pairs. By ensuring that the lines B′-J, B′″-K, D′-L and D″-M are all parallel, and also parallel to the antenna structure central vertical axis 100′, analysis and the imaginary transfer of the first antenna bracket mounting formation 200 and the single pivot axis mounting formation 300 up to the pivot axis central mounting joint D″ (and vice versa) is achieved for horizontal (azimuth), vertical (tilt) and adjacent vertical (roll) heading in the reference point system.
With the aid of
In order to determine the antenna system “home position” heading in the horizontal (azimuth), vertical (tilt) and adjacent vertical (roll) directions in terms of absolute values (as well as relative values as described above), the J-M line horizontal (azimuth), vertical (tilt) and adjacent vertical (roll) heading needs to be measured with respect to the grid or true north (i.e. azimuth determination) and with respect to the central earth gravity axis (i.e. tilt and roll determination) on the reference point system. Several prior art solutions are currently available for such measurements. For example, US20090021447 and US20110225804 describe devices for the accurate measurement of the orientation of an antenna system in three directions, i.e. azimuth, tilt and roll, which can be used for the purpose described herein.
After completing the antenna system heading “home position” measurements in the three directions, i.e. azimuth, tilt and roll, with respect to the grid or true north (to be called herein as GTN) and with respect to the central earth gravity axis (to be called herein as CGA), the next step is to determine the necessary actions to be performed in order for the antenna system heading to be aligned to desired azimuth, tilt and roll directionality angles provided by the radio planning process and installation work orders (to be referred to herein as “planned position”). Although the first configuration of our antenna system in the “home position” may take any azimuth, tilt and roll directionality angle in space after installation completion, for simplicity purposes assume that the “home position” angles of the antenna system heading are as follows:
Attempting to re-adjust the antenna system heading from “home position” to “planned position” results in an antenna system heading “home position” offset of α1° OFF, β1° OFF and γ1° OFF degrees for azimuth, tilt and roll respectively. Therefore, in order to achieve alignment of the antenna system “home position” heading to the desired “planned position” heading one may simply assume that the “planned position” angles of the antenna system heading are as follow:
In the exemplary first configuration (as described with the reference to
By way of example, let us assume that the antenna system group “home position” is headed at an angle α° HP with respect to grid or true north (GTN). When the antenna system azimuth is offset (provided by the radio planning process and installation work orders) at +90° (i.e. α1° OFF=+90°) from “home position” and the tilt angle and roll angles occupy “home position” (tilt=β° HP where β° HP≠0° roll=γ° HP where γ° HP≠0°), then the antenna system tilt and roll angles at the “planned position” azimuth angle (planned azimuth=α° HP+90°=α° PP) shall be equal to γ° HP and β° HP respectively. This is due to the fact that, when the antenna system is rotating its azimuth heading from “home position” to “planned position”, the antenna system performs this movement over the central vertical axis (CVA) of the antenna structure. On top, knowing that the tilt plane and roll plane, by the aforementioned installation, are always perpendicular to the azimuth plane and always perpendicular to the central vertical axis (CVA) of the antenna structure, the antenna system heading on tilt plane will always be perpendicular to the antenna system heading on roll plane. The result of this is that, for every azimuth heading offset of +90° or −90° from the “home position”, the tilt and roll angles with respect to the central gravity axis (CGA) will reverse (i.e. the “home position” tilt angle β° HP where β° HP≠0° and the “home position” roll angle=γ° HP where γ° HP≠0°) such that the antenna system tilt and roll angles at the “planned position” azimuth angle (planned azimuth=α° HP+/−90°=α° PP) shall be equal to γ° HP and β° HP respectively).
Similarly, when the antenna system azimuth offset (provided from the radio planning process and installation work orders) is +180° or −180° (i.e. α1° OFF=+/−180°) from “home position” and the “home position” tilt angle=β° HP where β° HP≠0°) and the “home position” roll angle=γ° HP where γ° HP≠0°), then the antenna system tilt and roll angles at the “planned position” azimuth angle (planned azimuth=α° HP+/−180°=α° PP) shall be equal to −β° HP and −γ° HP respectively. Therefore, in order to achieve accurate re-alignment of the antenna system “home position” heading to the desired “planned position” heading for all three dimensions of interest, it can be realized that one cannot simply assume the calculation of the offset introduced for azimuth, tilt and roll angles in the “planned position”, having as reference the installed antenna system or antenna system group in “home position”. This assumption can only be applied in the case that the antenna structure, and more specifically, the central vertical axis (CVA) of the antenna structure after its installation, coincides with the central gravity axis (CGA) that defines the tilt and roll angles of the antenna system or antenna system group in the “home position”, i.e.:
Since it cannot be ensured from any installation procedure that the installation of an antenna structure, and more specifically the antenna structure's central vertical axis (CVA), will coincide with the central gravity axis (CGA), and since such installation imperfections will always be present in cellular communications network roll-outs, one needs to take into account the installation imperfections introduced and calculate the “home position” tilt angle for tilt=β° HP where βHP≠0° and the “home position” of roll angle for roll=γ° HP where γ° HP≠0°, for any azimuth angle at “planned position” displaced in between 0° and 360° on the azimuth plane with respect to “home position” in order to achieve antenna system re-alignment accuracy for any purpose.
The three dimensional antenna system alignment problems described in the previous paragraphs for azimuth re-adjustment can be overcome when an antenna system alignment algorithm, defining the relationship of the antenna system heading from “home position” to “planned position” for azimuth, tilt and roll heading angles, is applied at antenna system installation and any antenna system re-adjustment phase.
TILT @ “home position” after α1° OFF=β1° HP
ROLL @ “home position” after α1° OFF=γ1° HP
Therefore, in order to achieve accurate alignment from the antenna system “home position” to the desired “planned position”, one may calculate the “planned position” angles of the antenna system heading as follow:
It is to be noted that the radio planning process and installation work orders do not necessarily provide antenna system roll heading angles as they always assume successful antenna system installation on the roll plane and, as a result, assume roll directionality to be 0° with respect to the central gravity axis (CGA). Since an antenna system roll heading other than 0° would only impact the polarization angle of the antenna system dipoles (i.e. E-Field directionality), such a radio planning parameter and thus roll angle further degrees of freedom for installation error compensation are not discussed herein. However, any roll angle re-adjustment methods need not be considered standalone, because they are relevant to the antenna system azimuth and tilt heading at “planned position” when and if needed. The method of the present invention are particularly beneficial when applied to a dual pivot axis system in order to calculate installation imperfections of an antenna structure.
In order to address this problem, a reference point on the antenna structure can be introduced, according to the teachings of WO2011042226, such that the antenna system group “home position” is aligned with respect to this reference point, and the reference point is aligned to some heading in the horizon with respect to GTN. The reference point on the antenna structure will be referred to herein as ABS. In the exemplary first configuration as described with reference to
Even for relatively simple installation scenarios (like the one described above), the definition of the antenna system group “home position” with respect to ABS is an important aspect that needs to be considered when defining the antenna system group “home position” on the antenna structure. In an exemplary configuration comprising a triple antenna system, dual pivot axis per antenna system antenna structure, as shown in plan view in
As shown in
In the exemplary configuration as shown in
α° HP1 min=α° HP1−R°/2 and α° HP1 max=α° HP1+R°/2 where α° HP1=α°
α° PP1=[α°−60°≦α° HP1≦α°+60°] Antenna System 1:
α° HP2 min=α° HP2−R°/2 and α° HP2 max=α° HP2+R°/2 where α° HP2=α° HP1+R°
α° PP2=[α°+R°−60°≦α° HP2≦α°+R°−60°] Antenna System 2:
α° HP3 min=α° HP3−R°/2 and α° HP3 max=α° HP3+R°/2 where α° HP3=α° HP1+2R°
α° PP3=[α°+2R°−60°≦α° HP3≦α°+2R°+60°] Antenna System 3:
T correlating each antenna system α° HP1, α° HP2, α° HP3 with a reference point ABS, we need to know the first antenna system α° HP1 offset Θ° with respect to this reference point ABS. Assuming that the reference point ABS has an offset Θ°=α° with our first antenna system “home position” α° HP1 (i.e. ABS+Θ°=ABS+α°=α° HP1) then the antenna system “home position” for all antenna systems, with respect to ABS will be α° HP1=ABS+α°, α° HP2=ABS+α°+120°, α° HP3=ABS+α°+240°. The next step is to define the reference point ABS to the absolute azimuth heading in the horizon with respect to GTN. Several prior art solutions are currently available for such measurements. For example, US20090021447 and US20110225804 describe a device for the accurate measurement of the orientation of an antenna system in three directions, i.e. azimuth, tilt and roll which can be used for the purpose described herein.
By way of example, if we assume that the reference point ABS coincides with our first antenna system “home position” α° HP1 (i.e. Θ°=0°) and ABS=0° with respect to GTN, the assigned ABS (i.e. ABS=0°) does not satisfy the orientation of two antenna systems to achieve the azimuth directionality defined by radio planning and installation work orders for α PP1=α° PP2=110°. This is because the first antenna system has movement range of 0° to 120° [−60°≦α° HP1≦+60° ] (and therefore can be oriented at 110°) and the second antenna system has movement range of 120° to 240° [+60°≦α° HP2≦+180° ] (and therefore cannot be oriented at) 110°. In order to address this problem, it is necessary to select the ABS heading with respect to GTN.
The reference position utilized in the present invention is derived by the following procedure, graphically illustrated in
α° HP1min=α° PP1−120 and α° HP1max=α° PP1, i.e. A1temp=[α° PP1−120,α° PP1]
α° HP2min=α° PP2−240 and α° HP2max=α° PP2−120, i.e. A2temp=[α° PP2−240,α° PP2−120]
α° HP3min=α° PP3−360 and α° HP3max=α° PP3−240, i.e. A3temp=[α° PP3−360,α° PP3−240].
Having calculated the temporary antenna structure reference position acceptance range for each antenna system k attached to an antenna structure, a new antenna structure reference position acceptance range is computed by intersecting the temporary antenna structure reference position acceptance ranges, as
Anew=A1temp∩A2temp∩A3temp.
The optimum reference position value ABS, in the sense that it ensures maximum permissible antenna system movement range, needed for future azimuth re-adjustments, for either a single pivot axis or dual pivot axis antenna systems attached to the antenna systems, with respect to the installed horizontal (azimuth) directionality angles, is calculated by computing the new antenna structure reference position acceptance range mean value as:
ABS=(Anew min+Anew max)/2.
The antenna systems attached to an antenna structure are then aligned or pre-calibrated to the antenna structure reference point ABS. The parameters considered in the antenna system “home position” computations involve the antenna system movement range, with respect to the antenna system “home position” on the antenna structure and the number of antenna systems. In the same example, the antenna structure reference point ABS lays at an angle equal to the first antenna system minimum directionality angle, with respect to the first antenna system “home position” on the antenna structure. For each antenna system k=1 . . . n, with maximum permissible antenna system movement range R°, an antenna system “home position” on the antenna structure according to which the antenna system movement range is calibrated may be computed by α° HPk=0.5R×(2k−1). In a second example, the antenna structure reference point ABS lays at an offset angle θ° from the first antenna system minimum directionality angle, with respect to the first antenna system “home position” on the antenna structure. For each antenna system k=1 . . . n, with maximum permissible antenna system movement range R°, an antenna system “home position” on the antenna structure according to which the antenna system movement range is calibrated may be computed by α° HPk=θ+0.5R×(2k−1).
For n=3 antenna systems with maximum permissible antenna system movement range R°=120° attached to an antenna structure are aligned or pre-calibrated to the antenna structure reference point ABS at 60°, 180° and 300°. Otherwise stated, the antenna system “home positions” are thus aligned or pre-calibrated to the antenna structure reference point at 60°, 180°and 300°. As a further example, the n=6 antenna systems with maximum permissible antenna system movement range 60° attached to an antenna structure are aligned or pre-calibrated to the antenna structure reference point at 30°, 90°, 150°, 210°, 270° and 330°. Otherwise stated, the antenna system “home positions” are thus aligned or pre-calibrated to the antenna structure reference point ABS at 30°, 90°, 150°, 210°, 270° and 330°.
An alignment device such as the one described in US20110225804A1 may be fixedly attached to the antenna structure reference point to determine the absolute azimuth, tilt and roll antenna structure reference point directionality with respect to GTN and CGA. The use of an alignment device to undertake the antenna structure reference point alignment with respect to the reference position may result in a precise antenna system alignment with minimum inaccuracy (less than) ±1° with respect to the specified horizontal (azimuth) and vertical (tilt) directionality angles provided from the radio planning process and installation work order. A skilled reader will recognize that other means of absolute azimuth, tilt and roll directionality measurement may be utilized for the same purpose. Thus, the result is an absolute directionality positioning of the antenna structure reference point when an alignment device is attached thereto. Advantageously, the antenna structure reference point is arranged or otherwise positioned in accordance with the calculated reference position ABS.
In another exemplary implementation, the antenna structure reference point may be aligned, in accordance to the present invention, to a calculated reference position of ABS, following the process outlined in
The computations performed to calculate the antenna systems' first and/or second pivot axis offset with respect to the antenna systems home positions, in order to achieve the target horizontal (azimuth) directionality angles for each antenna system and the antenna system thereto attached are outlined in
In one embodiment of the present invention, the antenna structure reference point may be aligned, in accordance to the present invention, to a calculated reference position of ABS, following the process illustrated in
In one example mode of implementation, the antenna structure reference point lays at an angle equal to the first antenna system minimum directionality angle, with respect to the first antenna system home position on the antenna structure. For each antenna system k=1 . . . n, with maximum permissible antenna system movement range R, an antenna system absolute home position on the horizon according to which the antenna system movement range is calibrated may be computed by α° HPk=ABS+0.5R×(2k−1). For each antenna system k=1 . . . n, with maximum permissible antenna system movement range R, having a first pivot axis with maximum permissible movement range R1 and/or a second pivot axis with maximum permissible movement range R2 such that R=R1+R2, the antenna system absolute azimuth directionality may be computed by α° PPk=α° HPk+OA1+OA2, where OA1, OA2 are the first pivot axis and/or a second pivot axis offset angles with respect to the antenna system home positions.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the n=3 antenna systems with maximum permissible antenna system movement range 120° attached to an antenna structure are aligned or pre-calibrated to the antenna structure reference point at 60°, 180° and 300. Given the target directionality angles α° PP1=110°, α° PP2=110° and α° PP3=320°, the antenna structure reference point may be aligned, in accordance to the present invention, to a calculated reference position ABS of 350°. For each antenna system k=1, 2, 3 with maximum permissible antenna system movement range 120°, an antenna bracket absolute home position on the horizon according to which the antenna bracket movement range is calibrated may be computed by
α° HP1=350°+0.5×120×(2−1)=50°.
α° HP2=350°+0.5×120×(4−1)=170°.
α° HP3=350°+0.5×120×(6−1)=290°.
It can be seen that ABS should always calculated according to workflow of
(10) Antenna system group alignment on an antenna structure CVA
(11) Reference point system alignment on an antenna structure CVA
(12) Antenna system imaging and surveying on reference point system
(13) Measurement of reference point system directionality of azimuth, tilt and roll with respect to GTN and CGA respectively on a selected reference point ABS of known offset Θ° with respect to the first antenna system image on the reference point system
(14) Calculation of the antenna systems on the reference point system with respect to the selected reference point ABS measured azimuth, tilt and roll
(15) Assignment of antenna systems azimuth, tilt and roll directionalities with respect to GTN and CGA at “home position”
(16) Re-adjustment of antenna system azimuth heading from “home position” to “planned position” according to radio planning and installation work orders
(17) Computation of “new” tilt and roll directionalities after azimuth re-adjustment with respect to the “home position” directionalities measured on the reference point system
(18) Assignment of antenna system tilt and roll directionalities with respect to CGA at “home position” on re-adjusted azimuth heading with respect to GTN on “planned position”
(19) Re-adjustment of antenna system tilt and roll directionality from “home position” to “planned position” according to radio planning and installation work orders
In order to apply the method of
Referring now to
Azimuth adjustment is normally performed mechanically by moving the antenna around the antenna structure but could alternatively be performed electrically. Tilt re-adjustment is preferably performed by means of mechanical phase shifting of the dipoles feeding lines so as to adjust the direction of the radiation pattern in the tilt plane. Consequently, no further degrees of freedom, other than the electrical tilt options offered from the antenna system, will be described. Tilt adjustment may also be achieved by mechanical adjustment of the antenna. Similarly, roll adjustment may be performed mechanically or electrically. Often, however, roll adjustment is not required but measurement of the change to roll is still useful as it may affect future adjustments of azimuth or tilt. A printed circuit board (PCB) that serves the purpose of apparatus controller 900 is appropriately configured so as to perform all necessary Remote Electrical Tilt (RET) and Remote Azimuth Steering (RAS) apparatus operations by a sequence of steps as those are shown in
Advantageously, the use of a PCB controller to compute all necessary azimuth, tilt and roll headings for the antenna system, as well as providing the means of remotely communicating with a remote user, enables the apparatus to interface to third party devices (such as the antenna system RET kit and other antenna line devices) and also does not require use of on-site inclinometer sensors for tilt an roll measurements.
In an alternative configuration as shown in
Further aspects of the invention:
1. Apparatus for positioning an antenna pivotally attached about at a first pivot axis and a second pivot axis to a structure, comprising
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1112149.8 | Jul 2011 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/063938 | 7/16/2012 | WO | 00 | 4/7/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/011002 | 1/24/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5223845 | Eguchi | Jun 1993 | A |
20050248496 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060087476 | Piburn et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20090195467 | Vassilakis | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201349052 | Nov 2009 | CN |
1753075 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2474605 | Apr 2011 | GB |
2000278021 | Oct 2000 | JP |
WO 0201669 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 2007093689 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2011042226 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Written Opinion in PCT/EP2012/063938 dated Apr. 18, 2013. |
International Search Report in PCT/EP2012/063938 dated Apr. 18, 2013. |
United Kingdom Search Report in GB1112149.8 dated Nov. 4, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140218249 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |