This application relates to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to an antenna and a terminal.
With continuous development of communications technologies, more and more devices and apparatuses are used in constructing communications networks. Antennas responsible for transmitting and receiving wireless signal electromagnetic waves for interconnection between communications apparatuses have attracted more and more attention. As sizes of appearances of antennas are designed to be thinner and smaller, people have increasing demand for antennas capable of processing a multi-band electromagnetic wave.
An antenna of an optical network termination (ONT) in the conventional technology needs to be capable of receiving or sending both an electromagnetic wave of a 2.4 gigahertz (2.4G) band and an electromagnetic wave of a 5 gigahertz (5G) band. Therefore, the antenna of the ONT is usually a dual-band antenna. The dual-band antenna includes a 2.4G antenna and a 5G antenna that are connected. The 2.4G antenna and the 5G antenna use a solution of a single feed point and share a cable and a balun. To be specific, the dual-band antenna may receive or send the electromagnetic wave of the 2.4G band by using the 2.4G antenna thereof, or may receive or send the electromagnetic wave of the 5G band by using the 5G antenna thereof, and the 2.4G antenna and the 5G antenna receive or send electromagnetic waves on a same path.
When the dual-band antenna in the conventional technology is used, to achieve a smaller size of the antenna, the 2.4G antenna and the 5G antenna need to be disposed together in a “back-to-back” manner. However, this overemphasis on reduction of the size of the dual-band antenna results in that the 2.4G antenna and the 5G antenna of the dual-band antenna are relatively close to each other. As a result, when one antenna works, the antenna is interfered by the other antenna. Therefore, how to reduce mutual interference between the antennas of the two bands while the dual-band antenna has a relatively small size is a technical problem to be urgently resolved at present.
This application provides an antenna and a terminal, to reduce mutual interference between antennas of two bands while a dual-band antenna has a relatively small size.
According to a first aspect of this application, an antenna is provided, including a printed circuit board (PCB), a first antenna, and a second antenna.
The first antenna is partially or entirely printed in a rectangular region of a first surface of the PCB, and is configured to respond to an electromagnetic wave of a first band. The second antenna is entirely printed in the rectangular region, and is configured to respond to an electromagnetic wave of a second band.
The first antenna includes a first feeding portion and at least one stub.
The first feeding portion is disposed on a first side of a first diagonal line of the rectangular region, and is configured to perform mutual conversion between the electromagnetic wave of the first band and a wired signal. The at least one stub of the first antenna extends from the first feeding portion in a first direction. There is a first angle between the first direction and a long-edge direction of the rectangular region.
The second antenna includes a second feeding portion and at least one stub.
The second feeding portion is disposed on a second side of the first diagonal line of the rectangular region, and is configured to perform mutual conversion between the electromagnetic wave of the second band and a wired signal. The at least one stub of the second antenna extends from the second feeding portion in a second direction. There is a second angle between the second direction and the long-edge direction of the rectangular region. The first angle is different from the second angle.
Therefore, in the antenna provided in this embodiment, a structure in which the first antenna and the second antenna extend in different directions and are disposed on the two sides of the diagonal line of the same rectangular region is used, and the structure can fully utilize space of the rectangular region, so that the two antennas extending at different angles can be as close as possible. In addition, because there is a specific angle between the first antenna and the second antenna, a polarization difference can be further formed, thereby reducing mutual interference between the first antenna and the second antenna. In conclusion, the antenna provided in this application can reduce mutual interference between the antennas of the two bands while the antenna has a relatively small size.
In an embodiment of the first aspect of this application, the first antenna specifically includes a first stub and a second stub, and equivalent lengths of the first stub and the second stub are both ¼ of a wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the first band.
A first portion of the first stub extends from the first feeding portion in the first direction. A second portion of the first stub extends from an end of the first portion of the first stub and is disposed along a long edge on the first side.
A first portion of the second stub extends from the first feeding portion in a reverse direction of the first direction. A second portion of the second stub extends from an end of the first portion of the second stub and is disposed along a wide edge on the first side.
The second antenna specifically includes a third stub and a fourth stub, and equivalent lengths of the third stub and the fourth stub are both ¼ of a wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the second band.
A first portion of the third stub extends from the second feeding portion in the second direction. A second portion of the third stub extends from an end of the first portion of the third stub and is disposed along a long edge or a wide edge on the second side.
A first portion of the fourth stub extends from the second feeding portion in a reverse direction of the second direction and is disposed along the long edge on the second side.
In an embodiment of the first aspect of this application, an equivalent length of a stub of the antenna includes that a wavelength of an electromagnetic wave to which the stub that has not been bent can respond at the equivalent length is the same as a wavelength of an electromagnetic wave to which the stub that has been bent can respond at an actual length. The equivalent length is ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave.
Therefore, when the first antenna and the second antenna are dipole antennas, a size of the antenna provided in this application can be reduced by further bending two stubs of the dipole antenna. Because the stub of the antenna is bent, a length and a width of the stub need to be correspondingly changed, so that a wavelength of an electromagnetic wave to which the stub that has been bent can respond at the actual length is the same as a wavelength of an electromagnetic wave to which a stub whose equivalent length is ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave responds, thereby further reducing the size of the antenna.
In an embodiment of the first aspect of this application, the second direction is parallel to the long-edge direction of the rectangular region, or the second direction is perpendicular to the long-edge direction of the rectangular region.
In an embodiment of the first aspect of this application, the second portion of the first stub is bent along the long edge on the first side, and the second portion of the first stub includes at least one bent portion.
The second portion of the second stub is bent along the wide edge on the first side, and the second portion of the second stub includes at least one bent portion.
The second portion of the third stub is bent along the long edge or the wide edge on the second side, and the second portion of the third stub includes at least one bent portion.
A second portion of the fourth stub is bent along the long edge on the second side, and the second portion of the fourth stub includes at least one bent portion.
Therefore, based on the foregoing embodiments, in the antenna provided in this embodiment, the stubs of the first antenna and the second antenna can be further bent for a plurality of times, and each stub includes at least one bent portion, thereby further reducing the size of the antenna.
In an embodiment of the first aspect of this application, the first antenna is partially printed in the rectangular region.
The first portion of the first antenna is printed in the rectangular region, the second portion of the first antenna is a steel sheet connected to the first portion of the first antenna, and a plane on which the second portion of the first antenna is located is parallel to the first surface.
Therefore, in the antenna provided in this embodiment, because a part of the antenna is printed on the PCB and a part of the antenna extends out of the PCB, a PCB area occupied by the antenna can be further reduced. An area that is occupied by the antenna and that is of the rectangular region on the PCB is further reduced in comparison. In addition, the antenna provided in this embodiment can fully utilize space in a terminal device. When there is a gap between a PCB of the terminal device and a housing of the terminal device, the second portion of the first antenna of the antenna in this embodiment is disposed in the gap between the PCB and the housing in a form of a steel sheet, thereby further improving space utilization in the terminal device.
In an embodiment of the first aspect of this application, the first antenna is partially printed in the rectangular region.
The first portion of the first antenna is printed in the rectangular region, and the first portion includes an endpoint that is of the at least one stub of the first antenna and that extends from the first feeding portion in the first direction.
The second portion of the first antenna is a steel sheet connected to the first portion of the first antenna, and a plane on which the steel sheet is located is perpendicular to the first surface.
Therefore, in the antenna provided in this embodiment, because there is a specific angle between the first antenna and the second antenna, a polarization difference can be further formed, thereby reducing mutual interference between the first antenna and the second antenna and ensuring relatively high isolation between the first antenna and the second antenna. In this way, mutual interference between the antennas of the two bands is reduced while the dual-band antenna has a relatively small size. In addition, in this embodiment, because the first antenna is disposed vertically above a PCB 1, space above the first surface of the PCB in the housing of the terminal device can be fully utilized, thereby further improving space utilization in the terminal device.
In an embodiment of the first aspect of this application, the first feeding portion includes a first balun, configured to connect the first stub and the second stub of the first antenna to a first feeder. The first feeder is a coaxial cable including a first cable and a second cable, and the first feeder is perpendicular to the first direction and extends towards a direction that is of the first feeding portion and that is away from the first diagonal line.
A first end of the first balun is a reference location of the first antenna and is connected to the first stub and the first cable. A second end of the first balun is a feed point of the first antenna and is connected to the second stub and the second cable.
The second feeding portion includes a second balun, configured to connect the third stub and the fourth stub of the second antenna to a second feeder. The second feeder is a coaxial cable including a third cable and a fourth cable, and the second feeder is perpendicular to the second direction and extends towards a direction that is of the second feeding portion and that is away from the first diagonal line.
A first end of the second balun is a reference location of the second antenna and is connected to the third stub and the third cable. A second end of the second balun is a feed point of the second antenna and is connected to the fourth stub and the fourth cable.
Therefore, in the antenna provided in this embodiment, a policy of orthogonally disposing the baluns is used in the first antenna and the second antenna, and a cabling manner of separating the feeders from each other is used. In this way, mutual impact between the first antenna and the second antenna and mutual blocking of cables can be effectively reduced, and isolation between the two antennas is further improved and mutual impact between the two antennas is weakened while the antenna has a relatively small size.
According to a second aspect of this application, a terminal is provided. The terminal includes the antenna according to any one of the embodiments of the first aspect, and the antenna is disposed on a printed circuit board PCB of the terminal.
In conclusion, this application provides an antenna and a terminal. The antenna includes the printed circuit board PCB, the first antenna, and the second antenna. The first antenna includes the first feeding portion and the at least one stub. The first feeding portion is disposed on the first side of the first diagonal line of the rectangular region. The at least one stub of the first antenna extends from the first feeding portion in the first direction. There is the first angle between the first direction and the long-edge direction of the rectangular region. The second antenna includes the second feeding portion and the at least one stub. The second feeding portion is disposed on the second side of the first diagonal line of the rectangular region. The at least one stub of the second antenna extends from the second feeding portion in the second direction. There is the second angle between the second direction and the long-edge direction of the rectangular region. The first angle is different from the second angle. In the antenna provided in this application, the structure in which the first antenna and the second antenna extend in different directions and are disposed on the two sides of the diagonal line of the same rectangular region is used, and the structure can fully utilize space of the rectangular region, so that the two antennas extending at different angles can be as close as possible. In addition, because there is the specific angle between the first antenna and the second antenna, the polarization difference can be further formed, thereby reducing mutual interference between the first antenna and the second antenna and ensuring relatively high isolation between the first antenna and the second antenna. Therefore, the antenna and the terminal provided in this application can reduce mutual interference between the antennas of the two bands while the dual-band antenna has a relatively small size.
The following describes technical solutions of this application with reference to accompanying drawings.
This application provides an antenna, and in particular, a dual-band antenna, to reduce mutual interference between antennas of two bands in the dual-band antenna while the dual-band antenna has a relatively small size. The antenna provided in this application may be used in any terminal device that needs to send and receive a dual-band wireless signal. The terminal device may also be referred to as a terminal. The terminal device may be a device such as a mobile phone, a notebook computer, a tablet computer, a router, or an optical network termination (optical network termination, ONT).
The following describes, with reference to
Specifically, the first antenna 3 is partially or entirely printed in a rectangular region 2 of a first surface of the PCB 1, and is configured to respond to an electromagnetic wave of a first band. In
The first antenna 3 includes a first feeding portion 31 and at least one stub. The first feeding portion 31 is configured to when the first antenna 3 responds to the electromagnetic wave of the first band, perform mutual conversion between the electromagnetic wave of the first band and a wired signal. The at least one stub of the first antenna 3 extends from the first feeding portion 31 of the first antenna 3 in a first direction 30. As shown in
The second antenna 4 is entirely printed in the rectangular region 2, and is configured to respond to an electromagnetic wave of a second band. The second antenna 4 is disposed on a second side of the first diagonal line 20 of the rectangular region 2, that is, the second antenna 4 and the first antenna 3 are separately disposed on two sides of the first diagonal line 20 of the rectangular region 2. In
The second antenna 4 includes a second feeding portion 41 and at least one stub. The second feeding portion 41 is configured to when the second antenna 4 responds to the electromagnetic wave of the second band, perform mutual conversion between the electromagnetic wave of the second band and a wired signal. The at least one stub of the second antenna 4 extends from the second feeding portion 41 of the second antenna 4 in a second direction 40. As shown in
In particular, the first angle and the second angle in this embodiment are different, that is, the first direction 30 and the second direction 40 are different. For example, the first angle α is different from the second angle β in the example shown in
Therefore, the first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4 provided in this embodiment separately extend in the first direction 30 and the second direction 40, and the first direction 30 and the second direction 40 are different directions. Because a stub of the first antenna 3 extends in the first direction 30, a form of the first antenna 3 is equivalent to a dipole antenna disposed in the first direction 30. Because a stub of the second antenna 4 extends in the second direction 40, a form of the second antenna 4 is equivalent to a dipole antenna disposed in the second direction 40. The first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4 that are both dipole antennas are disposed at different angles, so that polarization directions of the first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4 are different, thereby forming a polarization difference. A structure in which the first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4 extend in different directions and are disposed on the two sides of the diagonal line of the same rectangular region is used, and the structure can fully utilize space of the rectangular region, so that the two antennas extending at different angles can be as close as possible. In addition, because there is a specific angle between the first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4, a polarization difference can be further formed, thereby reducing mutual interference between the first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4 in the dual-band antenna and ensuring relatively high isolation between the first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4. In conclusion, the antenna provided in this application can reduce mutual interference between the antennas of the two bands while a dual-band antenna has a relatively small size.
Optionally, in the foregoing embodiment, a portion that is of the first antenna 3 and that is printed on the PCB 1 may be printed in the rectangular region 2 of the PCB 1 by using a material and a process that are the same as those of a circuit line printed on the PCB 1. The material may be a metal conductor material, for example, copper commonly used for the PCB.
It should be noted that an original copper clad layer and another original conductor material of the PCB 1 should be removed from the entire rectangular region 2 of the PCB 1, to ensure that another portion of the rectangular region 2 other than the printed first antenna 3 and the printed second antenna 4 is entirely insulated, to keep a clearance condition of the antenna to be the same as that of an edge of the copper cladding layer of the PCB 1.
Optionally, the PCB 1 in the foregoing embodiment may be any existing PCB in the foregoing terminal device, or a PCB specifically disposed in the foregoing terminal device to implement the antenna in this embodiment.
Preferably, if the PCB 1 in the foregoing embodiment is a rectangle, the rectangular region 2 should be located at any angle of the rectangular PCB 1, that is, a vertex of the rectangular region 2 should coincide with a vertex of the rectangular PCB 1. In this way, the rectangular region 2 occupies a relatively concentrated position of the PCB 1 and occupies only one angle of the rectangular PCB 1, and a region of the PCB 1 other than the rectangular region 2 may still be used to implement another original function of the PCB 1.
Optionally, in the foregoing embodiment, both the feeding portion of the first antenna 3 and the feeding portion of the second antenna 4 should be connected to a wired cable, so that after the feeding portion converts, into a wired signal, a wireless electromagnetic wave signal to which at least one stub of the antenna responds, the wired signal is transmitted by using the wired cable, or after the feeding portion converts, into a wireless electromagnetic wave signal, a wired signal transmitted by the wired cable, the wireless electromagnetic wave signal is sent by using at least one stub.
Preferably, in the embodiment shown in
Another manner of disposing the second antenna is shown in an embodiment of
Based on disposing in
Further preferably, in this embodiment, an ONT device has an antenna that responds to an electromagnetic wave of a 2.4G wavelength and an antenna that responds to an electromagnetic wave of a 5G wavelength. In disposing of the ONT, a 2.4G antenna is disposed as the first antenna in this embodiment, and a 5G antenna is disposed as the second antenna in this embodiment.
Optionally, both the first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4 in the foregoing embodiment are dipole antennas. In this case, two stubs of the first antenna 3 have a same length and extend in the first direction and the reverse direction of the first direction, and both lengths of the two stubs are ¼ of a wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the first band. Two stubs of the second antenna 4 have a same length and extend in the second direction and the reverse direction of the second direction, and both lengths of the two stubs are ¼ of a wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the second band.
In particular, when a length of the at least one stub of the first antenna 3 is greater than that of the at least one stub of the second antenna 4, the first antenna 3 with a longer stub may be disposed obliquely on one side of the diagonal, and the second antenna 4 with a shorter stub may be disposed horizontally or perpendicularly on the other side of the diagonal. Because the stub of the first antenna 3 is longer, the at least one stub of the first antenna 3 may extend along two sides of the rectangular region 2, so that the stubs of the first antenna 3 “encircle” the second antenna 4 “like two arms”. To be specific, a tight space coupling manner of encircling and nesting is used, and the at least one stub of the first antenna 3 is disposed in an “L” shape or in a detour cabling manner around the sides of the rectangular region 2, so that structures of the first antenna 3 and the second antenna 4 are more compact.
The following further describes the antenna in the embodiments with reference to
As shown in
It should be noted that the equivalent length in the embodiments of this application includes that a length of ¼ of a wavelength of an electromagnetic wave to which an antenna stub that has not been bent can respond is used as an equivalent length. After a length and a width are adjusted, the stub that has been bent has an actual length and the actual length is not equal to the equivalent length. The stub of the actual length and the stub whose equivalent length is ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave have a same function, and respond to a same wavelength of an electromagnetic wave. To be specific, although the length a-c of the first stub is not ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the first band, that is, is not the equivalent length, the first stub can still replace the stub of the equivalent length (¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave) as the stub that has been bent and that has the actual length, to respond to the electromagnetic wave of the first band. Further, if a sum (a-c shown in the figure) of lengths of the first portion 321 and the second portion 322 of the first stub is less than ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the first band, the second portion 322 of the first stub needs to be bent, that is, the second portion 322 of the first stub is bent along the long edge 21 on the first side in
The first portion 331 of the second stub extends from the first feeding portion 31 in a reverse direction of the first direction (h-i shown in the figure), and the second portion 332 of the second stub extends from an end i of the first portion 331 and is disposed along a wide edge 22 on the first side (i-j shown in the figure). A second stub of a dipole antenna needs to respond to the electromagnetic wave of the first band. A principle is the same as that of the first stub. The first portion 331 and the second portion 332 of the second stub extend at different angles. Therefore, a length and a width of the second stub need to be adjusted, so that the second stub that has been bent can respond to ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the first band at an equivalent length. Further, if a sum (h-j shown in the figure) of lengths of the first portion 331 and the second portion 332 of the second stub is less than ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the first band, the second portion 332 of the second stub needs to be bent, that is, the second portion 332 of the second stub is bent along the wide edge 22 on the first side in
The first portion 431 of the third stub extends from the second feeding portion 41 in the second direction (l-m shown in the figure), and the second portion 432 of the third stub extends from an end m of the first portion 431 and is disposed along a wide edge 24 on the second side (m-n shown in the figure). A third stub of a dipole antenna needs to respond to the electromagnetic wave of the second band. However, the first portion 431 and the second portion 432 of the third stub extend at different angles. Therefore, a length and a width of the third stub need to be adjusted, so that the third stub that has not been bent can respond to ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the second band at an equivalent length. Further, if a sum of lengths of the first portion 431 and the second portion 432 of the third stub is less than ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the second band, the second portion 432 of the third stub needs to be bent, that is, the second portion 432 of the third stub is bent along the wide edge 24 on the second side in
The first portion 421 of the fourth stub extends from the second feeding portion 42 in a reverse direction of the second direction (p-q shown in the figure), and the second portion 422 of the fourth stub extends from an end q of the first portion 421 and is disposed along a long edge 23 on the second side (q-r shown in the figure). A fourth stub of a dipole antenna needs to respond to the electromagnetic wave of the second band. However, the first portion 421 and the second portion 422 of the fourth stub extend at different angles. Therefore, a length and a width of the fourth stub need to be adjusted, so that the fourth stub that has not been bent can respond to ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the second band at an equivalent length. Further, if a sum of lengths of the first portion 421 and the second portion 422 of the fourth stub is less than ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the second band, the second portion 422 of the fourth stub needs to be bent, that is, the second portion 422 of the fourth stub is bent along the long edge 23 on the second side in
As shown in
The first portion 421 of the fourth stub extends from the second feeding portion 42 in a reverse direction of the second direction (w-x shown in the figure), and the second portion 422 of the fourth stub extends from an end x of the first portion 421 and is disposed along a long edge 23 on the second side (x-y shown in the figure). A fourth stub of a dipole antenna needs to respond to the electromagnetic wave of the second band. However, the first portion 421 and the second portion 422 of the fourth stub extend at different angles. Therefore, a length and a width of the fourth stub need to be adjusted, so that the fourth stub that has not been bent can respond to ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the second band at an equivalent length. Further, if a sum of lengths of the first portion 421 and the second portion 422 of the fourth stub is less than ¼ of the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave of the second band, the second portion 422 of the fourth stub needs to be bent, that is, the second portion 422 of the fourth stub is bent along the long edge 23 on the second side in
More specifically, this application further provides, based on the foregoing embodiments, an example of a specific size of the antenna shown in
The lengths and the widths of the stubs of the antenna provided in the embodiments are only an example of a specific implementation and are not intended to limit absolute values, and instead may be adjusted within a specific precision range, for example, from −1 mm to +1 mm, to achieve better isolation of the antenna. It should be noted that the length and the width of the antenna provided in this embodiment are a example obtained when the first antenna responds to the 2.4 GHz electromagnetic wave and the second antenna responds to the 5 GHz electromagnetic wave. If the first antenna and the second antenna respectively respond to electromagnetic waves of other bands, or a material of the antenna changes, or different types of PCBs are used, the lengths and the widths of the stubs of the antenna also need to be adjusted correspondingly. An adjustment manner may be based on a length and a width of an optimal antenna obtained in emulation software or an engineering test. In this application, only a relationship between relative positions of the two antennas is emphasized, and lengths and widths of extending the stubs of the two antennas are not specifically limited.
Further, in the antenna provided in the embodiments shown in
In particular, because a part of the antenna in this embodiment is printed on the PCB and the other part of the antenna extends out of the PCB, an area of the PCB 1 occupied by the antenna can be further reduced. For example, an area of the rectangular region 2 shown in
Optionally,
Therefore, in the antenna provided in this embodiment, a policy of orthogonally disposing the baluns is used in the first antenna and the second antenna, and a cabling manner of separating the feeders from each other is used. In this way, mutual impact between the first antenna and the second antenna and mutual blocking of cables can be effectively reduced, and isolation between the two antennas is further improved and mutual impact between the two antennas is weakened while the antenna has a relatively small size. A principle of a balun in the conventional technology may be used for the balun provided in this embodiment. In this embodiment, only an angle and a position of disposing the balun are emphasized. For a specific implementation principle, refer to an existing balun. In addition, only the second antenna shown in
The foregoing implementations, schematic structural diagrams, or schematic emulation diagrams are only examples for describing the technical solutions of this application. Size proportions and emulation values thereof do not constitute any limitation on the protection scope of the technical solutions. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, and the like made within the spirit and principle of the foregoing implementations shall fall within the protection scope of the technical solutions.
This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/CN2018/109201, filed on Sep. 30, 2018, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6320545 | Nagumo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
7064729 | Olson | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071875 | Sugimoto et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7755559 | Pakosz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
9099773 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9437935 | DeLuis et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9729213 | Hartenstein | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20060284780 | Chen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070152885 | Sorvala | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080246670 | Vlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100149058 | Bosshard et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110263217 | Chiu et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20140242903 | DeLuis et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20170170552 | Baek | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170373393 | Tatomirescu et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2310682 | Dec 2000 | CA |
2671143 | Jan 2005 | CN |
1723588 | Jan 2006 | CN |
201576755 | Sep 2010 | CN |
102117962 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102832455 | Dec 2012 | CN |
103337696 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103633438 | Mar 2014 | CN |
105009364 | Oct 2015 | CN |
204720560 | Oct 2015 | CN |
105027352 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105990693 | Oct 2016 | CN |
106602267 | Apr 2017 | CN |
206163700 | May 2017 | CN |
106876983 | Jun 2017 | CN |
107834183 | Mar 2018 | CN |
207517873 | Jun 2018 | CN |
108521014 | Sep 2018 | CN |
2642587 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2012064993 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2015160200 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Valizade, A. et al., “A Novel Design of Reconfigurable Slot Antenna with Switchable Band Notch and Multiresonance Functions for UWB Applications,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 11, 2012, 4 pages. |
Sane, L. et al., “Dual-Band Pattern Reconfigurable 5G Antenna using Dual-Band BLC,” 2018 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements and Applications (CAMA), XP033444241, Date of Conference: Sep. 3-6, 2018, 4 pages. |
Shao, J.J. et al., “A Resistor-Loaded UWB TEM Horn Antenna,” Journal of Micorwaves, vol. 30, No. 2, Apr. 2014, 5 pages (English Abstract). |
Zhang, M. et al., “A Dual-Band MIMO Antenna with High Isolation for Internet Things,” Telecommunication Engineering, vol. 58, No. 2, Feb. 2018, 4 pages (English Abstract). |
Zhou, J. et al., “A Multiband Monopole Antenna with Arrow-Shaped Aperture-Coupled Resonators,” 2017 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Fall (PIERS—FALL) Nov. 19-22, 2017, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210210872 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/CN2018/109201 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 17209676 | US |