The present invention relates to an antenna array arrangement, and a multi band antenna comprising at least one such antenna array arrangement.
Multi band antennas are antennas providing wireless signals in multiple radio frequency bands, i.e. two or more bands. They are commonly used and are well known in wireless communication systems, such as GSM, GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, LTE, and WiMax systems.
Such multi band antennas often comprises antenna arrays which are commonly used for transmitting and/or receiving wireless communication signals, such as Radio Frequency (RF) signals, in wireless communication systems. In this respect, the antenna arrays often comprises a plurality of antenna elements adapted for transmitting and/or receiving in different frequency bands.
The dual band antenna elements are adapted for transmitting and/or receiving in a lower frequency band and in a higher frequency band while the single band antenna elements are adapted for transmitting and/or receiving in the higher frequency band only. The dual band and single band antenna elements are arranged such that the distance between the centres of two adjacent elements transmitting/receiving in the same frequency is often 0.5-1.0 times the wavelength for the centre frequency for the operational frequency band, and typically around 0.8 of that wavelength. That is, the distance between two adjacent single band antenna elements dx is often 0.8 times the wavelength for the centre frequency for the higher frequency band while the distance between two adjacent dual band antenna elements dy is often 0.8 times the wavelength for the centre frequency for the lower frequency band.
Although this type of antenna array arrangement has proved useful in modern wireless communication system, e.g. in base station antennas, they have some drawbacks.
One such drawback is that the prior art arrangements as shown in
The drawback with the configuration in
Hence, there is a need for an improved antenna array arrangement for multi band antennas in the art.
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide an antenna array arrangement which fully or in part mitigates and/or solves the drawbacks of prior art antenna array arrangements. More specifically, the object of the present invention is to provide an antenna array arrangement which makes it possible to support dual band and single band antenna elements where there is a large spacing in the frequency range between a lower and a higher frequency and/or where the higher frequency is more than 2 times higher than the lower frequency.
Another object of the invention is to provide an antenna array arrangement which may be designed less bulky and taking up less space than prior art solutions. Yet another object of the invention is to provide an alternative antenna array arrangement compared to prior art.
According to one aspect of the invention, the mentioned objects are achieved with an antenna array arrangement for a multi band antenna, comprising a plurality of first dual band antenna elements adapted for transmitting/receiving in a lower antenna frequency band and in a higher antenna frequency band, a plurality of first single band antenna elements adapted for transmitting/receiving in the higher antenna frequency band, the first dual band antenna elements and the first single band antenna elements being arranged in a row, wherein at least two first single band antenna elements are arranged adjacent to each other.
Furthermore, the present invention also relates to a multi band antenna comprising at least one antenna array arrangement according to the invention.
The present invention provides an antenna array arrangement which allows smaller inter antenna element spacing, thereby avoiding undesirable grating lobes. This also means that the antenna design can be less bulky and smaller than prior art solutions, resulting in slim and cost effective antenna array designs with reduced weight. The present invention is especially suitable for antenna applications where there is a large spacing in the frequency range between the lower and higher frequencies.
An important aspect of the invention is that the inter antenna element spacing for both the lower antenna frequency band and the higher antenna frequency band is different, i.e. “non uniform spacing”, over the antenna array in order to accommodate the different types of antenna elements in such a way that the effective element spacing (average spacing) over the array is such that undesired grating lobes are avoided in both bands.
Other implications of the invention include that electrical performance will be more consistent compared to prior art, e.g. undesired effects where horizontal beam peak of the two frequency bands are different and distorted azimuth radiation patterns.
Further advantageous and applications of the present invention can be found in the following detailed description of the present invention.
The appended drawings are intended to clarify and explain different embodiments of the present invention in which:
To achieve aforementioned and further objectives, the present invention relates to an antenna array arrangement, and preferably to an antenna array arrangement for multi band antennas adapted for wireless communication systems, such as such as GSM, GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, LTE, WiMax and other systems. An embodiment of such an antenna array arrangement is shown in
The antenna arrangement according to the present invention comprises a plurality of dual band 101 and single band 102 antenna elements. The dual band antenna elements 101 are adapted for transmitting/receiving in two different frequency bands. i.e. in a lower antenna RF band and a higher antenna RF band, while the single band antenna elements 102 are adapted for transmitting/receiving in the higher of the two mentioned RF bands. The antenna elements of the present arrangement are arranged in a row/array as shown in
Two such single band antenna elements 102 are shown with a dotted circle in
According to an embodiment of the invention, the at least two single band antenna elements 102 are arranged between two dual band antenna elements 101, which is also shown in
Also, according to yet another embodiment, the distance d2 between the centres of the at least two first single band antenna elements 102 is 0.6-0.8 times the wavelength for the centre frequency of the higher antenna frequency band and the distance between first dual band antenna elements 101 and first single band antenna elements 102 is 0.8-1.0 times the wavelength for the centre frequency of the higher antenna frequency band.
According to an embodiment, the centre frequency for the higher frequency band is more than 2 times higher than the centre frequency band for the lower frequency band. The centre frequencies for the first type dual band 101 and first type single band 102 antenna elements, i.e. the lower and higher frequency bands, are according to further embodiments of the invention within the interval of: 790 to 960 MHz and 2.3 to 2.7 GHz; 698 to 894 MHz and 2.3 to 2.7 GHz; 698 to 894 MHz and 3.6 to 3.8 GHz; or 790 to 960 MHz and 3.6 to 3.8 GHz, respectively. Hence, the ratio is around 2.86, 3.14, 4.65 and 4.22 for these embodiments. The number of single band antenna elements arranged between dual band antenna elements may be more than two, e.g. three or four.
This arrangement further comprises a plurality of second type of dual band antenna elements 103 and second type of single band 104 antenna elements which according to an embodiment are alternately arranged with respect to each other so that every second antenna element is a second dual band 103 or a second single band 104 element as shown in the lower antenna part in
The centre frequencies for the first type dual band 101 and first type single band 102 antenna elements, i.e. the lower and higher frequency bands, are e.g. within the interval of 790 to 960 MHz, and 2.3 to 2.7 GHz, respectively; while the centre frequencies for the second dual band 103 and second single band 104 antenna elements, i.e. the lower and the intermediate frequency bands, are within the interval of 790 to 960 MHz, and 1710 to 2170 MHz, respectively, so that a triple band antenna is formed. The antenna elements used may e.g. be patch antenna elements or dipoles, or any other suitable antenna construction.
Since the embodiment in
The reflector according to this embodiment comprises a first reflector assembly 1 and at least one second reflector assembly 2. The first reflector assembly 1 has a first reflector structure adapted for the lower antenna frequency band and at least the higher antenna frequency band, and the second reflector assembly 2 has a second reflector structure adapted for the lower antenna frequency band and at least the intermediate antenna frequency band.
The first 1 and second reflector 2 assemblies are electrically coupled to each other so that they together form a common reflector structure R adapted for the lower, intermediate and higher antenna frequency bands. Thus, the first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies have a reflector structure adapted for at least one common antenna frequency band, in this case the lower antenna frequency band.
It should therefore be realised that the common reflector R may comprise more than two reflector assemblies. However, two or more reflector assemblies making up the common reflector R should each have a reflector structure adapted for at least one common antenna frequency band fC.
Such a reflector has good radiation control for multiband antennas. This is especially the case for multi band antennas transmitting in multiple antenna frequency bands where the frequency bands are considerably spaced apart in the frequency range. Another advantage with such a common reflector R is that a large and/or complex reflector structure for multiple bands can be assembled with two or more reflector assembly parts having simple structure, thereby simplify and reducing cost when manufacturing such reflectors, and make transportation easier of these reflectors. This also implies that a high degree of freedom is at disposal for the antenna designer when designing reflectors for multiband antenna since the designer can combine different reflector structures to obtain a common reflector structure.
Moreover, a reflector structure adapted for a specific antenna frequency band should in this disclosure mean that the reflector structure is so arranged that a transmit antenna having such a reflector fulfils one or more of the requirements of different reflector parameters known in the art. The reflector parameters are often specified for different applications and may concern horizontal beam width, front to back lobe ratio, cross polar discrimination, port to port tracking, etc. To achieve this, the reflector structure has a specific shape and may comprise shielding walls, baffles, corrugations and/or current traps, etc. for controlling radiation of the antenna. Typically, such parameters may be specified as: horizontal beam width (halfpower/−3 dB) 65 or 90 degrees; front to back lobe ratio 25-30 dB (+/−30 deg sector); cross polar discrimination 10-15 dB (worst case in +/−60 deg sector); port to port tracking<2 dB (worst case in +/−60 deg sector).
The first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies are electrically coupled so that they together form a common reflector structure R so arranged that the common reflector structure R fulfils one or more of the above mentioned reflector parameters, e.g. provides a specific beam width characteristic or front to back lobe ratio.
The electrical coupling may be an indirect coupling, such as a capacitive coupling, or a direct coupling. A capacitive coupling can be made by using a non-conductive adhesive, e.g. tape or glue, between the first and second reflector assemblies. A direct electrical coupling can be achieved by spot welding, anodizing and bolting or by using a conductive adhesive.
The common reflector R is in this case adapted for triple band antennas, and as mentioned the centre frequencies (e.g. the carrier frequencies) for the three bands are within the interval of 790 to 960 MHz for the lower antenna frequency band, the interval of 1710 to 2170 MHz for the intermediate antenna frequency band, and the interval of 2.3 to 2.7 GHz for the higher antenna frequency band, respectively.
Moreover, base station antennas in mentioned wireless communication systems are often exposed to harsh environmental conditions, such as rain, snow, ice, heavy winds, etc. Hence, an important aspect when designing such antennas is the mechanical stiffness and robustness to withstand such conditions. The robustness of such antennas depends more or less on the reflector design since the reflector is an important and integral part of the antenna construction. Accordingly, the first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies are furthermore mechanically connected to each other according to another embodiment.
Each of the support brackets 11, 11′ are mechanically connected to and extends along each opposite side of the first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies, respectively. The first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies has in this embodiment an elongated flat shape and the same width.
Preferably, the first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies are U-shaped in cross-section as shown in the figures. With this reflector design, each support bracket 11, 11′ is L-shaped to fit the U-shape of the first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies, thereby improving the stiffness and robustness of the reflector R construction further and also saving space. This embodiment is shown in
To further improve electrical and/or mechanical coupling/connection between the first 1 and second reflector assemblies 2, on or more connector plates 13 may be provided to connect the two assemblies 1, 2. The connector plates 13 may be arranged on the front side and/or on the backside of the common reflector R, and extend over and being attached to both the first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies so as to provide a robust reflector structure R.
Preferably, the first 1 and second 2 reflector assembly parts are made of aluminium, e.g. by folding aluminium sheet metal or by extrusion. The different reflector parts, such as the first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies, support brackets 11, 11′, connector plates 13, and connecting elements 12 may be mechanically connected to each other by e.g. screwing, riveting, bolting, welding, etc, which provide a direct electrical coupling.
To yet further improve the mechanical robustness and stiffness of the reflector R, one or more connecting elements 12 may be provided for electrically and mechanically connecting the support brackets 11, 11′. The connecting elements are preferably arranged on the back side of the reflector so as not to influence the radiation of the antenna elements by being arranged in front of the antenna elements.
A rectangular connecting element 12 with a cross is shown in
It should also be noted that the first 1 and second 2 reflector assemblies according to yet another embodiment comprises at least one pair of symmetrically arranged partially enclosed cavities functioning as current traps 31, 31′ for trapping surface currents on the reflector as shown in
The present invention further relates to a multi band antenna comprising at least one antenna array arrangement and at least one reflector R described above.
Those skilled in the art will also recognize that the described antenna array arrangement will not be dependent on the polarization of the antenna elements but will work for antennas with e.g. vertical polarization, circular polarization or dual +/−45 deg polarization.
Finally, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but also relates to and incorporates all embodiments within the scope of the appended independent claims.
The present application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119 (e) of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/482,892, filed May 5, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6211841 | Smith et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6937191 | Puente Baliarda | Aug 2005 | B2 |
8228256 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20020109633 | Ow et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030090431 | Gottl | May 2003 | A1 |
20030137456 | Sreenivas et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040108956 | Gottl et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050030247 | Baliarda | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102007060083 | Jun 2009 | DE |
1496569 | Jan 2005 | EP |
WO 2007011295 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International-type Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2011 from Application No. SE1150395-0. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120280880 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61482892 | May 2011 | US |