The present invention relates generally to signal transmission and reception in a wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) communication system. More specifically, the invention relates to a system and method of transmission using an antenna array to improve signal reception in a wireless CDMA communication system.
A prior art CDMA communication system is shown in
Shown in
For timing synchronization with a receiver, an unmodulated pilot signal is used. The pilot signal allows respective receivers to synchronize with a given transmitter allowing despreading of a data signal at the receiver. In a typical CDMA system, each base station 20 sends a unique pilot signal received by all UEs 34-38 within communicating range to synchronize forward link transmissions. Conversely, in some CDMA systems, for example in the B-CDMA™ air interface, each UE 34-38 transmits a unique assigned pilot signal to synchronize reverse link transmissions.
When a UE 34-36 or a base station 20-32 is receiving a specific signal, all the other signals within the same bandwidth are noise-like in relation to the specific signal. Increasing the power level of one signal degrades all other signals within the same bandwidth. However, reducing the power level too far results in an undesirable received signal quality. One indicator used to measure the received signal quality is the signal to noise ratio (SNR). At the receiver, the magnitude of the desired received signal is compared to the magnitude of the received noise. The data within a transmitted signal received with a high SNR is readily recovered at the receiver. A low SNR leads to loss of data.
To maintain a desired signal to noise ratio at the minimum transmission power level, most CDMA systems utilize some form of adaptive power control. By minimizing the transmission power, the noise between signals within the same bandwidth is reduced. Accordingly, the maximum number of signals received at the desired signal to noise ratio within the same bandwidth is increased.
Although adaptive power control reduces interference between signals in the same bandwidth, interference still exists limiting the capacity of the system. One technique for increasing the number of signals using the same radio frequency (RF) spectrum is to use sectorization. In sectorization, a base station uses directional antennas to divide the base station's operating area into a number of sectors. As a result, interference between signals in differing sectors is reduced. However, signals within the same bandwidth within the same sector interfere with one another. Additionally, sectorized base stations commonly assign different frequencies to adjoining sectors decreasing the spectral efficiency for a given frequency bandwidth. Accordingly, there exists a need for a system which further improves the signal quality of received signals without increasing transmitter power levels.
A first reference signal and a first data signal are transmitted from a first antenna of a base station and a second reference signal and a second data signal are transmitted from a second antenna of the base station. The first and second antennas are difference antennas. The first and second reference signals having different codes and the first and second data signals having different codes. The received first and second reference signals are combined using an adaptive algorithm producing adaptive algorithm weights. Data from the first and second data signals is recovered by combining the first and second data signal in response to adaptive algorithm weights.
The preferred embodiments will be described with reference to the drawing figures where like numerals represent like elements throughout.
By using an antenna array, the transmitter utilizes spacial diversity. If spaced far enough apart, the signals radiated by each antenna 48-52 will experience different multipath distortion while traveling to a given receiver. Since each signal sent by an antenna 48-52 will follow multiple paths to a given receiver, each received signal will have many multipath components. These components create a virtual communication channel between each antenna 48-52 of the transmitter and the receiver. Effectively, when signals transmitted by one antenna 48-52 over a virtual channel to a given receiver are fading, signals from the other antennas 48-52 are used to maintain a high received SNR. This effect is achieved by the adaptive combining of the transmitted signals at the receiver.
The pilot signal receiving circuit is shown in
By using the same weights for the data signal as used with each antenna's pilot signal, each RAKE 82-86 compensates for the channel distortion experienced by each antenna's signals. As a result, the data signal receiving circuit optimizes the data signals reception over each virtual channel. By optimally combining each virtual channel's optimized signal, the received data signal's signal quality is increased.
A LMS algorithm used for generating a weight is shown in
The data receiving circuit used with the embodiment of
Another pilot signal receiving circuit is shown in
The data signal receiving circuit used with the embodiment of
If the spacing of the antennas 48-52 in the transmitting array is small, each antenna's signals will experience a similar multipath environment. In such cases, the pilot receiving circuit of
The data signal recovery circuit used with the embodiment of
The invention also provides a technique for adaptive beam steering as illustrated in
The advantage of the invention's beam steering are two-fold. The transmitted data signal is focused toward the target receiver improving the signal quality of the received signal. Conversely, the signal is focused away from other receivers reducing interference to their signals. Due to both of these factors, the capacity of a system using the invention's beam steering is increased. Additionally, due to the adaptive algorithm used by the pilot signal receiving circuitry, the weights are dynamically adjusted. By adjusting the weights, a data signal's beam will dynamically respond to a moving receiver or transmitter as well as to changes in the multipath environment.
In a system using the same frequency for downlink and uplink signals, such as time division duplex (TDD), an alternate embodiment is used. Due to reciprocity, downlink signals experience the same multipath environment as uplink signals send over the same frequency. To take advantage of reciprocity, the weights determined by the base station's receiver are applied to the base station's transmitter. In such a system, the base station's receiving circuit of
In the receiving circuit of
The transmitting circuit of
The circuit of
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/068,718, filed Feb. 6, 2002, which issued on Jan. 3, 2006 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,983,008; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/068,659, filed Feb. 6, 2002, which issued on Jun. 3, 2003 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,574,265, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/602,963, filed Jun. 23, 2000, which issued on Apr. 16, 2002 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,373,877; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/394,452 filed Sep. 10, 1999, which issued on Sep. 5, 2000 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,115,406.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3662268 | Gans et al. | May 1972 | A |
4736460 | Rilling | Apr 1988 | A |
4901307 | Gilhousen et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5146475 | Kubo | Sep 1992 | A |
5319677 | Kim | Jun 1994 | A |
5331666 | Dent | Jul 1994 | A |
5381443 | Borth et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5457704 | Hoeher et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5493563 | Rozanski et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5623511 | Bar-David et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5652764 | Kanzaki et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5673294 | Namekata | Sep 1997 | A |
5680419 | Bottomley | Oct 1997 | A |
5694388 | Sawahashi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5757791 | Kanterakis et al. | May 1998 | A |
5809020 | Bruckert et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812542 | Bruckert et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822380 | Bottomley | Oct 1998 | A |
5822701 | Tomisato et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5886987 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903834 | Wallstedt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5933424 | Muto | Aug 1999 | A |
5952968 | McDowell | Sep 1999 | A |
5982327 | Vook et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991332 | Lomp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009074 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026130 | Rahmatullah et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044120 | Bar-David et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067324 | Harrison | May 2000 | A |
6069884 | Hayashi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081566 | Molnar et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6108517 | Arslan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6147985 | Bar-David et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148041 | Dent | Nov 2000 | A |
6154443 | Huang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160801 | Uchida et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161209 | Moher | Dec 2000 | A |
6215762 | Dent | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6335954 | Bottomley et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6385181 | Tsutsui et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6434366 | Harrison et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459740 | Lo | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470047 | Kleinerman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470192 | Karlsson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483866 | Suzuki | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484285 | Dent | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501788 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501803 | Alamouti et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6556634 | Dent | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6647070 | Shalvi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6694154 | Molnar et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697441 | Bottomley et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6731700 | Yakhnich et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6870825 | Huang | Mar 2005 | B1 |
20010030993 | Bottomely et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020003846 | Khayrallah et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020122510 | Yakhnich et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150187 | Chugg et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154704 | Reshef | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020181430 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030013468 | Khatri | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030053524 | Dent | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058929 | Cox et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030092456 | Dent | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 674 455 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 715 421 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 755 127 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0 820 157 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 881 781 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 892 508 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0 899 894 | Mar 1999 | EP |
2 280 575 | Feb 1995 | GB |
H09-261204 | Oct 1997 | JP |
H11-186991 | Jul 1999 | JP |
9401956 | Jan 1994 | WO |
9534140 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9611533 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9621295 | Jul 1996 | WO |
9713386 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9904537 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9912283 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9923767 | May 1999 | WO |
9952311 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0035159 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0044141 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0048330 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0069192 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0105088 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0128174 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0145289 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0209297 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0223787 | Mar 2002 | WO |
02065719 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02067444 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02084892 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03003604 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03010899 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2004012341 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060098720 A1 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10068718 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 11315795 | US | |
Parent | 10068659 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10068718 | US | |
Parent | 09602963 | Jun 2000 | US |
Child | 10068659 | US | |
Parent | 09394452 | Sep 1999 | US |
Child | 09602963 | US |