1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to communication systems and components. More particularly the present invention is directed to antenna arrays for wireless communication systems.
2. Description of the Prior Art and Related Background Information
Modern wireless antenna implementations generally include a plurality of radiating elements that may be arranged over a ground plane defining a radiated (and received) signal beam width and azimuth scan angle. Azimuth antenna beam width can be advantageously modified by varying amplitude and phase of an RF signal applied to respective radiating elements. Azimuth antenna beam width has been conventionally defined by Half Power Beam Width (HPBW) of the azimuth beam relative to a bore sight of such antenna array. In such antenna array structure radiating element positioning is critical to the overall beam width control as such antenna systems rely on accuracy of amplitude and phase angle of the RF signal supplied to each radiating element. This places severe constraints on the tolerance and accuracy of a mechanical phase shifter to provide the required signal division between various radiating elements over various azimuth beam width settings.
Real world applications often call for an antenna array with beam down tilt and azimuth beam width control that may incorporate a plurality of mechanical phase shifters to achieve such functionality. Such highly functional antenna arrays are typically retrofitted in place of simpler, lighter and less functional antenna arrays while weight and wind loading of the newly installed antenna array can not be significantly increased. Accuracy of a mechanical phase shifter generally depends on its construction materials. Generally, highly accurate mechanical phase shifter implementations require substantial amounts of relatively expensive dielectric materials and rigid mechanical support. Such construction techniques result in additional size, weight, and electrical circuit losses as well as being relatively expensive to manufacture. Additionally, mechanical phase shifter configurations that have been developed utilizing lower cost materials may fail to provide adequate passive intermodulation suppression under high power RF signal levels.
Consequently, there is a need to provide a simpler method to adjust antenna beam width control while retaining down tilt beam capability.
In a first aspect the present invention provides an antenna for a wireless network comprising a reflector having first, second and third generally planar reflector panels. The antenna further comprises first, second and third columns of plural radiator elements coupled to respective reflector panels with the second column of radiator elements configured between the first and third columns of radiator elements. The first and third radiator elements are movable relative to each other to alter the spacing of the first and third columns of radiator elements.
In a preferred embodiment of the antenna the second plurality of radiator elements may be fixed to the second reflector panel. The first and third reflector panels are preferably generally coplanar. The first and third radiator elements are movable in a direction generally parallel to the planar surfaces of the reflector panels. The first and third reflector panels are preferably configured below the adjacent planar surface of the second reflector panel. If the first and third reflector panel planar surfaces are defined by a Y-axis and a Z-axis parallel to the plane of the reflector surface and an X-axis extending out of the plane of the reflector, the columns of plural radiator elements are parallel to the Z-axis and the radiator elements are movable in the Y direction. The first and third plurality of radiators are preferably aligned in pairs in the Y direction. The second plurality of radiator elements are preferably offset in the Z direction from the first and third radiator element pairs. The first and third columns of radiator elements may for example comprise seven radiator elements in each and the second column of radiator elements may comprise eight radiator elements. The first and third columns of radiator elements are movable in opposite directions to form a wide beam width setting at a first spacing and a narrow beam width setting in a second wider spacing between the two columns. For example, the variable beam width settings may have a variable spacing of about 110 mm to 170 mm between the first and second respective columns and a half power beam width varying from about 105 degrees to 45 degrees.
In another aspect the present invention provides a mechanically variable beam width antenna comprising a reflector structure having plural generally planar reflector panels, the plural reflector panels including a center panel and first and second outer panels, wherein the center panel is configured above the outer panels in a radiating direction. The antenna further includes a first plurality of radiators coupled to the first outer panel and configured in a first column, a second plurality of radiators coupled to the second outer panel and configured in a second column, and a third plurality of radiators coupled to the center panel and configured in a third column. The first and second plurality of radiators are movable relative to each other from a first configuration wherein the first and second columns are spaced apart a first distance in a wide beam width setting to a second configuration where the first and second columns of radiators are spaced apart a second greater distance in a narrower beam width setting.
In a preferred embodiment of the antenna the spacing in the first and second configurations ranges from about 110 mm to about 170 mm. The antenna preferably further comprises an RF feed control circuit for providing unequal RF signal feed between the outer panel radiators which comprise the first and second plurality of radiators and the center panel radiators which comprise the third plurality of radiators. The antenna preferably further comprises an RF phase control circuit for providing an adjustable RF signal phase between the outer panel radiators which comprise the first and second plurality of radiators and the center panel radiators which comprise the third plurality of radiators. The reflector structure preferably has a cross sectional shape wherein the reflector panels form a two level step shape which may have rounded transition regions between the two outer panels and the center panel. The first and second plurality of radiators may be configured in aligned pairs aligned in a direction perpendicular to the columns and the third plurality of radiators are offset from the first and second radiator pairs. The third plurality of radiators may be fixed to the center panel.
In another aspect the present invention provides a method of adjusting signal beam width in a wireless antenna having a plurality of radiators configured on at least three separate reflector panels including two coplanar outer panels and a non-coplanar center panel, wherein radiators on the two outer panels are movable. The method comprises providing the radiators in a first configuration where the outer panel radiators are spaced apart a first distance to provide a first signal beam width and moving the radiators in a direction generally parallel to the coplanar surface of the outer panels to a second configuration spaced apart a second distance to provide a second signal beam width.
In a preferred embodiment the method further comprises providing separate phase adjustment control of the RF signals applied to the radiators on the separate panels to control azimuth beam gradient control.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated from the following detailed description of the invention.
The radiating elements are arranged in columns having respective center lines P0, P1 and P2 as shown. Radiating elements disposed on the outer lying reflector portions (or panels) (105A, 105C) are orthogonally movable relative to the center line of respective reflector planes to alter their spacing (to alter P1 & P2 spacing). For example, in an exemplary implementation a total of eight radiating elements (110, 140, 170, 200, 230, 260, 290, 320) are disposed on the center portion of the reflector (105B). The center column radiators are rigidly attached to the center portion of the reflector (105B) which is elevated (in X direction) above the common level plane set forth by (coplanar) outer lying reflectors (105A, 105C) planes. Antenna (100) also employs two sets of seven movable radiating elements. Left most group of seven movable radiating elements (120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300) are disposed on the left portion of the reflector plate (105A). Right most group of seven movable radiating elements (130, 160, 190, 220, 250, 280, 310) are disposed on the right portion of the reflector plate (105A). The two movable radiating element groups are orthogonally movable relative to center reflector plate center line (P0).
Referring to
In
Consider a first operational condition for an exemplary implementation wherein the movable RF radiators in the outer panels have right and left group (or column) center lines (P1 and P2) set at 110 mm (minimum separation distance=2×Hs) together with phase shifters set to −45 degree setting (providing phase taper). This results in a wide azimuth beam width of approximately 105 degrees. A simulated radiation pattern for this configuration is shown in the azimuth plot of
Consider a second operational condition for an exemplary implementation wherein movable RF radiators right and left groups (columns) center lines (P1 and P2) are set at 170 mm (maximum separation distance=2×Hs) together with phase shifters set to 0 degree phase shift setting. This results in narrow azimuth beam width of approximately 45 degrees. A simulated radiation pattern for this configuration is shown in the azimuth plot of
In view of the above it will be appreciated that the invention also provides a method of mechanically adjusting signal beam width in a wireless antenna having a plurality of radiators configured on at least three separate reflector panels including two coplanar outer panels and a non-coplanar center panel by moving the radiators on the outer panels to different configurations providing variable beam width. A method of electrical beam width control is also provided as described above by control of phase shift and amplitude to the radiators.
In view of the above it will be appreciated the invention provides a number of features and advantages including combinational use of radiating element displacement, phase shifter and offset reflector plane for ultra wide range of azimuth adjustability. Further features and aspects of the invention and modifications of the preferred embodiments will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/961,582, filed Aug. 7, 2013, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,000,998, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/359,938, filed Jan. 26, 2009, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,508,427, which claims the benefit under 35 USC 119 (e) of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/062,658, filed Jan. 28, 2008, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1795397 | Hoyt | Mar 1931 | A |
2473421 | Fubini et al. | Jun 1949 | A |
2535049 | Rosa | Dec 1950 | A |
5274391 | Connolly | Dec 1993 | A |
5345248 | Hwang | Sep 1994 | A |
5440318 | Butland et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5572222 | Mailandt et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5949303 | Arvidsson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966102 | Runyon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969689 | Martek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6034649 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067053 | Runyon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6285336 | Zimmerman | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6515633 | Ippolito | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529172 | Zimmerman | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6567055 | Oglesby | May 2003 | B1 |
6697029 | Teillet et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6717555 | Teillet et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747606 | Harel et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756939 | Chen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6809694 | Webb et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6822618 | Bisiules et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6864837 | Runyon et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6922169 | Moh'd Izzat et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924776 | Le et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933905 | Ippolito | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950061 | Howell et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7006053 | Zigler et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7075497 | Teillet et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7151498 | Bassily | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7173572 | Teillet et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183989 | Tietjen | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7209091 | Schadler et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7358922 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7405710 | Bisiules et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7710344 | Deng et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8508427 | Deng et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8643559 | Deng et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8870069 | Bellows | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9000998 | Deng | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9153873 | Ng et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9461368 | Azulay et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9601834 | Rankin et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
20020008672 | Gothard et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020135528 | Teillet et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020149529 | Fleming et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040051677 | Göttl | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050192727 | Shostak et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219140 | Browne et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231437 | Dai et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060139224 | Tietjen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060220976 | Schadler et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070008236 | Tillery et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030208 | Linehan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070146222 | Mansour | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070205952 | Deng et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241979 | Yang | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080246681 | Deng et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090015498 | Deng et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090262039 | Lytle et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20130321233 | Deng et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140028513 | Deng et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0566522 | Oct 1993 | EP |
1098391 | May 2001 | EP |
1950832 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2863110 | Jun 2005 | FR |
WO-2005060045 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2008156633 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,938, Advisory Action dated Jul. 20, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,938, Final Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,938, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,938, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 12, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,938, Response filed Jun. 25, 2012 to Final Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2012”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,938, Response filed Oct. 17, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,582, Final Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,582, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,582, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 26, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,582, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 7, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,582, Response filed Apr. 7, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2013”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,582, Response filed Nov. 5, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,483, Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,483, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, 312 Amendment filed Dec. 23, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Advisory Action dated Oct. 31, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 4, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Dec. 30, 2013”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Response filed Apr. 21, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Response filed Jun. 18, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Response filed Oct. 20, 2011 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/157,646, Response filed Nov. 21, 2011 to Advisory Action dated Oct. 31, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Advisory Action dated May 19, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 13, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Response filed Apr. 13, 2016 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2016”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Response filed Jun. 1, 2016 to Advisory Action dated May 19, 2016”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Response filed Aug. 24, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,528, Examiner Interview Summary dated Feb. 2, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 07751869.4, Supplemental European Search Report dated Feb. 4, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 087683850, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jul. 4, 2016”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08768385.0, Examination Notification Art 94(3) dated Jul. 15, 2015”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08768385.0, Extended European Search Report dated May 8, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08768385.0, Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08768385.0, Office Action dated May 27, 2013”, 1 pg. |
“European Application Serial No. 08768385.0, Response filed Jan. 16, 2017 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jul. 4, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08768385.0, Response filed Jan. 25, 2016 to Examination Notification Art 94(3) dated Jul. 15, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08768385.0, Response filed Dec. 4, 2013 to Office Action dated May 27, 2013”, 33 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/002845, International Search Report dated Jun. 2, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“International Application No. PCT/US2008/002845, Written Opinion dated Jun. 2, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/003176, International Search Report dated Jun. 11, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/003176, Written Opinion dated Jun. 11, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/007333, ilnternational Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 17, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/007333, International Search Report dated Aug. 8, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/007333, Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2008” 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 14, 2017”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,196, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 23, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150244068 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61062658 | Jan 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13961582 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14677528 | US | |
Parent | 12359938 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 13961582 | US |