The present invention relates to antenna calibration for active, phased array antennas. Specifically, the present invention relates to a built in apparatus for autonomous monitoring of the operational condition of the elements of an antenna array.
A known method of calibrating an array antenna is to use calibration coupler manifolds 150, as shown in
Referring to
When using a calibration coupler, a portion of the element channel 140 is not included in the calibration process. One problem with calibration coupler manifolds 150 is that they are relatively large devices and so cause problems in the design of an array antenna which incorporates them. Another problem with calibration coupler manifolds 150 is that the coupling factors at each channel have individual variability which needs to be removed to achieve optimum performance, i.e. the accuracy of antenna calibration is limited to the extent that the individual manifold outputs are known.
Alternatively, another known method for calibrating an array antenna is to use an external scanner. This involves placing an external scanning apparatus in front of the array face and scanning the properties of each radiating element of the array in turn by moving the scanner over each radiating element and measuring the radiation it produces and/or receives. It has many moving parts which require maintenance, especially because the equipment usually operates in exposed environments as this is where equipment employing phased array antennas is usually operated. In addition, this is a slow process and requires normal use of the equipment to stop while calibration is performed.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of continuous on-line monitoring of each element in an array antenna comprising the steps of: (i) transmitting known test signals to one or more elements of the array antenna; (ii) monitoring responses of the elements to the test signals; and (iii)comparing the response with expected responses for the elements to determine an operation condition of the elements.
An advantage of the present invention is that the operational condition of the transmit/receive elements in an antenna array can be continuously monitored in the periods where it is not actively being used, while not precluding the array from active use as the monitoring signals may be interspersed among usual operational transmissions. Additionally, the present invention does not introduce extra equipment to the array, e.g. calibration coupler manifolds, that itself requires further calibration to prevent accuracy limitations.
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings that have like reference numerals, wherein:
A first embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to
In
In
Initially, the calibration antennas 210, 220, 230, 240 need to self-calibrate: this is performed in pairs, using the overlapping coverage areas between each pair, in turn, to check each calibration antenna 210, 220, 230, 240 against a common antenna element in the array face 250. The self-calibration method is as follows:
Three antenna elements 410, 420, 430 in the region of the array face 250 that is within range of the two calibration antennas 210, 220 to be calibrated are arbitrarily selected. For illustration, the following procedure is described with the elements in transmit mode; the same procedure is carried out in receive mode, with the transmit and receive roles of the elements and the calibration antennas reversed. Each antenna element 410, 420, 430 radiates a known signal in sequence. The radiated signals are detected by both calibration antennas 210, 220. The received signals at each calibration antenna 210, 220 are compared to that of the other respective calibration antenna 220, 210 and the known radiated signal. The process then repeats with a different pair of calibration antennas 220, 230, selecting different antenna elements 430, 440, 450 to radiate the known signal. Once all neighbouring pairs of calibration antennas 210, 220, 230, 240 have been through this process, a calibration coefficient for each calibration antenna 210, 220, 230, 240 is determined to produce the same output at each calibration antenna 210, 220, 230, 240 for a given input. The calibration coefficient is the difference between the desired signal and the achieved detected signal and once applied will align the gains and phases of the array.
The calibration process that occurs during normal operation repeats the as follows, with reference to
For illustration, the following procedure is described with the elements in transmit mode; the same procedure is carried out in receive mode, with the transmit and receive roles of the elements and the calibration antennas reversed. Each antenna element in the array 250 radiates a known signal in sequence. The radiated signals are detected by a designated calibration antenna 210, for example, in whose quadrant the particular element is situated. The received signal at the calibration antenna 210 is compared to desired response to the known radiated signal. The process then repeats with all remaining elements in the array, selecting different calibration antennas 210, 220, 230, 240 to radiate the known signal. Once all elements have been through this process, a calibration coefficient for each element is determined to produce the desired output at each calibration antenna 210, 220, 230, 240 for a given input.
Each array has a first pass scan performed when it is first assembled at, for example, the factory that has assembled the array. This first pass scan creates one or more first pass coefficients for either portion of the array and/or the entire array. Using the calibration antennas mounted around the array, once these have been self-calibrated, the values for these coefficients can be computed.
In a second embodiment, by incorporating the fixed auxiliary radiators of the above embodiment at intervals around the periphery of the array, a means of coupling RF energy into the antenna elements from the array is introduced. Test signals may then be routed to each of these radiators in turn, which illuminate the array elements at high angles of incidence. The elements' responses to these test signals may then by used as a guide to their operational condition. The test signals may be interspersed during normal operational transmissions and hence offer a continuous on-line monitoring process.
In the systems of the first and second embodiments of the present invention, the full RF chain is tested, comprising active antenna element (including attenuator and phase shifter functions), beamformer, transmit output power, receive gain, and attenuator and phase shifter accuracy on every element can be monitored.
It is to be understood that any feature described in relation to any one embodiment may be used alone, or in combination with other features described, and may also be used in combination with one or more features of any other of the embodiments, or any combination of any other of the embodiments. Furthermore, equivalents and modifications not described above may also be employed without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the accompanying claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07253442 | Aug 2007 | EP | regional |
0716969.1 | Aug 2007 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2008/050686 | 8/8/2008 | WO | 00 | 11/24/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/027725 | 3/5/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5001675 | Woodward | Mar 1991 | A |
5235342 | Orton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5253188 | Lee et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5530449 | Wachs et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532706 | Reinhardt et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5572219 | Silverstein et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5657023 | Lewis et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677696 | Silverstein et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5784030 | Lane et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5809063 | Ashe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5861843 | Sorace et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864317 | Boe et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867123 | Geyh et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5909191 | Hirshfield et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5929809 | Erlick et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929810 | Koutsoudis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5977930 | Fischer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6037898 | Parish et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054951 | Sypniewski | Apr 2000 | A |
6084545 | Lier et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6127966 | Erhage | Oct 2000 | A |
6157343 | Andersson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163296 | Lier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6232918 | Wax et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252542 | Sikina et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6339399 | Andersson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356233 | Miller et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6448939 | Maruta | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6480153 | Jung et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489923 | Bevan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6636173 | Graham | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6778130 | Bevan et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778147 | Sanada et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6940453 | Kim | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7068218 | Göttl et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7106249 | Kubo et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7215298 | Fraschilla et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7324042 | Werntz et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7340248 | Kawasaki et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358898 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362266 | Collinson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379019 | Kennedy et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7405696 | Kennedy et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7423586 | Schieblich | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7545321 | Kawasaki | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20040032365 | Gottl et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040061644 | Lier et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040127260 | Boros et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040252752 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060009162 | Tan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060119511 | Collinson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060192710 | Schieblich | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060273959 | Kawasaki | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070293269 | Kuwahara et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 812 027 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1 496 567 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1 670 095 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1 724 875 | Nov 2006 | EP |
2 199 447 | Jul 1988 | GB |
2 224 887 | May 1990 | GB |
2 300 076 | Oct 1996 | GB |
WO 9534103 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9852248 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9952173 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 9954960 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 02087009 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2004025321 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004025321 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100253570 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |