The present invention relates to an antenna control system for varying the beam tilt of one or more antenna. More particularly, although not exclusively, the present invention relates to a drive system for use in an antenna which incorporates one or more phase shifter.
In order to produce downtilt in the beam produced by an antenna array (for example a panel antenna) it is possible to either mechanically tilt the panel antenna or electrically steer the beam radiated from the panel antenna according to techniques known in the art.
Panel antennas, such as those to which the present application is concerned, are often located on the sides of buildings or similar structures. Mechanical tilting of the antenna away from the side of the building increases the susceptibility of the installation to wind induced vibration and can impact on the visual environment in situations where significant amounts of downtilt are required.
In order to avoid the above difficulties, electrical beam steering can be effected by introducing phase delays into the signal input into radiating elements or groups of radiating elements in an antenna array. Such techniques are described in New Zealand Patent Specification No. 235010.
Various phase delay techniques are known, including inserting variable length delay lines into the network feeding to the radiating element or elements, or using PIN diodes to vary the phase of a signal transmitted through the feeder network.
A further means for varying the phase of two signals is described in PCT/NZ94/00107 whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. This specification describes a mechanically operated variable differential phase shifter incorporating one input and two outputs.
For the present purposes it is sufficient to note that phase shifters such as those described in PCT/NZ94/00107 are adjusted mechanically by sliding an external sleeve along the body of the phase shifter which alters the relative phase of the signals at the phase shifter outputs.
A typical panel antenna will incorporate one or more phase shifters and the present particular embodiment includes three phase shifters. A signal is input to the primary phase shifter which splits the signal into two signals having a desired phase relationship. Each phase shifted signal is then input into a secondary phase shifter whose outputs feeds at least one radiating element. In this manner a progressive phase shift can be achieved across the entire radiating element array, thus providing a means for electrically adjusting the downtilt of the radiated beam. Other phase distributions are possible depending on the application and shape of the radiated beam.
While the steering action is discussed in the context of downtilt of the radiated beam, it is to be understood that the present detailed description is not limited to such a direction. Beam tilt may be produced in any desired direction.
Another particular feature of the variable differential phase shifters is that they provide a continuous phase adjustment, in contrast with the more conventional stepped phase adjustments normally found in PIN diode or stepped length delay line phase shifters.
In a panel antenna of the type presently under consideration, it is desirable to adjust the entire phase shifter array simultaneously so that a desired is degree of beam tilt may be set by the adjustment of a single mechanical setting means. The mechanical drive which performs such an adjustment must result in reproducible downtilt angles and be able to be adapted to provide for a number of different phase shifter array configurations.
It is also desirable that the beam tilt of an antenna may be varied remotely to avoid the need for personnel to climb a structure to adjust antenna beam tilt.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a mechanical drive system for use in adjusting mechanical phase shifters which mitigates the abovementioned difficulties, provides a solution to the design requirements of the antennas or antenna arrays described above, or at least provides the public with a useful choice.
Accordingly, there is provided a mechanical adjustment means for adjusting the relative phase shifts produced by a plurality of phase shifters connected to an array of radiating elements, said mechanical adjustment means including:
Preferably, movement of the second means results in simultaneous movement of a first portion of a third phase shifter with respect to a second portion of the third phase shifter wherein the third phase shifter is fed from an output of the first phase shifter.
Preferably the outputs of the second and third phase shifters are connected to radiating elements so as to produce a beam which tilts as the first and second means adjusts the phase shifters.
Preferably the movement of the first portion of the first phase shifter a first distance relative to the second portion of the first phase shifter results in relative movement between first portions of the second and third phase shifters relative to second portions of the second and third phase shifters of about twice the first distance.
According to a first preferred embodiment the first means includes a gear wheel which drives a rack connected to a first portion of the first phase shifter, arranged so that rotation of the first gear wheel causes the first portion of the first phase shifter to move relative to the second portion of the first phase shifter. Preferably, the second portion of the first phase shifter is mounted to a carriage and the outputs of the first phase shifter are connected to inputs of the second and third phase shifters by push rods so that movement of the second portion of the first phase shifter moves the first portions of the second and third phase shifters with respect to the second portions of the second and third phase shifters.
Preferably a second gear is provided co-axial with and connected to a shaft driving the first gear which drives a rack connected to the second part of the first phase shifter so that rotation of the second gear causes movement of the first portion of the second and third phase shifters relative to the second portions of the second and third phase shifters.
Preferably the ratio between the first and second gear wheels is about 3:1.
According to a second embodiment of the present invention the adjustment means includes a shaft and said first means includes a first threaded portion provided on said shaft and a first cooperating threaded member connected to the first portion of the first phase shifter. The second means includes a second threaded portion provided on said shaft and a second cooperating threaded member connected to the first portion of the second phase shifter. The arrangement is such that rotation of the shaft causes the first portion of the first phase shifter to move relative to the second portion of the first phase shifter at a rate of about twice that of the movement of the first portion of the second phase shifter relative to the second portion of the second phase shifter.
Preferably the second threaded member is connected to the second portion of the first phase shifter and moves the first portion of the second phase shifter via a push rod. This push rod is preferably a coaxial line connecting an output from the first phase shifter to the input to the second phase shifter.
Preferably there is further provided a third phase shifter fed from a second output of the first phase shifter via a push rod which moves a first portion of the third phase shifter in unison with the first portion of the second phase shifter.
According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided an antenna system comprising one or more antenna including electromechanical means for varying the downtilt of the antenna and a controller, external to the antenna, for supplying drive signals to the electromechanical means for adjusting downtilt.
Preferably the system includes a plurality of antennas and the controller may adjust the downtilt for the plurality of antennas and store the degree of downtilt of each antenna in memory.
Preferably the controller may be controlled remotely from a control centre so that a plurality of such systems may be remotely controlled as part of a control strategy for a number of cellular base stations.
Preferably the electromechanical means varies the electrical downtilt of each antenna and means are included for monitoring the electromechanical means and providing signals representative of the position of the electromechanical means to the controller.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring to
Output signals from phase shifter 1 are supplied via lines 10 and 11 to inputs 12 and 13 of phase shifters 2 and 3 respectively. Feed lines 10 and 11 comprise coaxial push rods which serve the functions both of feeding signals from the outputs of phase shifter 1 to phase shifters 2 and 3 and moving first portions 14 and 15 of phase shifters 2 and 3 relative to second portion 16 and 17 of phase shifters 2 and 3 respectively.
Signals output from phase shifters 2 and 3 are supplied via coaxial lines 18, 19, 20 and 21 to be fed to respective radiating elements (not shown).
In use first portion 8 of phase shifter 1 may be moved relative to second portion 9 of phase shifter 1 to change the relative phase of signals supplied via lines 10 and 11 to phase shifters 2 and 3 respectively. First portions 14 and 15 of phase shifters 2 and 3 may be moved relative to second portions 16 and 17 of phase shifters 2 and 3 to vary the phase of signals supplied by lines 18, 19, 20 and 21 to respective radiating elements.
When phase shifters 1, 2 and 3 are adjusted in the correct respective portions the beam emitted by the antenna can be tilted as required. It will be appreciated that where a less defined beam is required fewer phase shifters may be employed.
To achieve even continuous beam tilting for the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
According to this first embodiment a rack 23 is secured to first portion 8 of phase shifter 1. Upon rotation of gear wheel 24 first portion 8 of phase shifter 1 may be moved to the left or the right. A smaller gear wheel 25 is secured to and rotates with gear wheel 24. This gear wheel engages with a rack 26 provided on carriage 22. A further gear wheel 27 is provided which may be driven to rotate gear wheels 24 and 25 simultaneously.
Gear wheel 24 has 90 teeth whereas gear wheel 25 has 30 teeth. It will therefore be appreciated that rotation of gear wheel 24 results in first portion 8 of phase shifter 1 being moved three times as far as carriage 22 (and hence first portions 14 and 15 of phase shifters 2 and 3). However, as carriage 22 is moving in the same direction as the first portion 8 of phase shifter 1 it will be appreciated that the relative movement between first portion 8 and second portion 9 of phase shifter 1 is twice that of the relative movement between the first and second portions of phase shifters 2 and 3. Accordingly, this arrangement results in the relative phase shift produced by phase shifter 1 being twice that produced by phase shifters 2 and 3 (as required to produce even beam tilting in a branched feed arrangement).
The particular arrangement is shown in more detail in
Referring now to
In this embodiment the drive mechanism includes a shaft 31 having a first threaded portion 32 and a second threaded portion 33 provided thereon. A first threaded member 34 is connected to a first portion 35 of primary phase shifter 36. A second threaded member 37 is connected to the second portion 38 of primary phase shifter 36.
First threaded portion 32 is of three times the pitch of second threaded portion 33 (e.g. the pitch of the first threaded portion 32 is 6 mm whereas the pitch of the second threaded portion is 2 mm). In this way, first portion 35 is driven in the direction of movement at three times that of second portion 38. In this way the phase shift produced by primary phase shifter 36 is twice that of second and third phase shifters 39 and 40.
Shaft 31 is rotated by motor 41. This may suitably be a geared down 12 volt DC motor. The other end of shaft 31 is supported by end bearing 42. A reed switch 43 is provided to detect when magnets 44 pass thereby. In this way the number of rotations of shaft 31 may be monitored. Limit switches 45 and 46 may be provided so that the motor is prevented from further driving shaft 31 in a given direction if threaded member 34 abuts a lever of limit switch 45 or 46 respectively.
Operation of the drive means according to the second embodiment will now be described by way of example. Motor 41 may rotate shaft 31 in an anticlockwise direction, viewed from right to left along shaft 31. Threaded member 37 is driven by second threaded portion 33 to move push rods 47 and 48 to the left, and thus to adjust phase shifters 39 and 40.
Threaded member 34 is driven to the left at three times the rate of threaded member 37. First portion 35 thus moves to the left at three times the rate of second portion 38. First portion 35 therefore moves relative to second portion 38 at twice the speed the first portions of phase shifters 39 and 40 move relative to their respective second portions. In this way, delays are introduced in the paths to respective radiating elements so as to produce an evenly tilting beam.
The conductivity of reed switch 43 is monitored so that the number of rotations, or part rotations, of shaft 31 may be monitored. If the motor continues driving shaft 31 until threaded member 34 abuts the lever of limit switch 45 then logic circuitry will only permit motor 41 to drive in the opposite direction. Likewise if threaded member 34 abuts the lever of limit switch 46 the motor 41 will only be permitted to drive in the opposite direction.
It will be appreciated that the techniques of both embodiments could be employed in antenna arrays using a larger number of phase shifters. In such applications the relative movement of the first portion of each phase shifter relative to the second portion of each phase shifter would decreased by a factor of 2 for each successive phase shifter along each branch. The ratios used may be varied if the radiation pattern of the antenna needs to be altered to account for the directivity of the individual radiating elements and the effect of the back panel as the amount of downtilt is varied.
Components of the drive mechanism 30 are preferably formed of plastics, where possible, to reduce intermodulation. Threaded members 34 and 37 preferably include plastic links to phase shifter 36 to reduce intermodulation.
It will be appreciated that a number of mechanical drive arrangements may be used to achieve adjustment of the phase shifters in the desired ratio. It is also to be appreciated that sophisticated control electronics may be employed, although the simplicity of construction of the present invention is seen as an advantage.
Likewise, if threaded member 34 is driven to the extreme right, switch 46 is opened to break the path via diode 75. This prevents motor 41 driving in such a direction as to drive threaded member 34 further to the right.
Lines 76 and 77 are connected to reed switch 43 so that the opening and closing of reed switch 43 may be monitored by an external control unit. In use, the opening and closing of reed switch 43 may be monitored to determine the position of threaded member 34, and hence the corresponding degree of tilt of the antenna.
To select an initial angle of downtilt threaded member 34 may be driven to the extreme right. An external controller may provide a current in one direction to motor 41 to drive member 34 to the right. The motor will continue to be driven to the right until threaded portion 34 abuts switch 46. When switch 46 is opened diode 75 will be open circuited, which will prevent the motor being driven further to the right.
The controller will sense that threaded member 34 is at its extreme right position as it will detect that reed switch 43 is not opening and closing. After a predetermined delay the controller may then provide a current in the opposite direction via lines 71 and 72 to motor 41 to drive it to the left. As the motor is driven to the left the controller will monitor the opening and closing of reed switch 43 to determine how far threaded member 34 has moved to the left. The controller will continue to move threaded member 34 to the left until reed switch 43 has opened and closed a predetermined number of times, corresponding to a desired angle of downtilt. Alternatively, threaded member 34 may be driven to the extreme left and then back to the right.
As shown in
Controller 80 may include a display 81, an “escape” button 82, an “enter” button 83, an “up” button 84 and “down” button 85. At power up display 81 may simply display a home menu such as “Deltec NZ Ltd© 1995”. Upon pressing any key, a base menu may be displayed including options such as:
The up/down keys may be used to move through the menu and the enter key 83 used to select an option. If “unlock controls” is selected a user will then be required to enter a three digit code. The up/down keys may be used to move through the numbers 0 to 9 and enter used to select each number. If the correct code is entered “locked released” appears. If the incorrect code is entered “controls locked” appears and a user is returned to the home menu. If “set array tilt” is selected from the base menu the following may appear:
The up-down keys 84, 85 may be used to select the desired array number. The enter key accepts the selected array and the previously recorded angle of downtilt may be displayed as follows:
In this example the previously set angle of downtilt with 4.6°. Using the up/down keys 84, 85 a new angle may be entered. Controller 80 may then provide a current to motor 41 via lines 71 and 72 to drive threaded portion 34 in the desired direction to alter the downtilt. The opening and closing of reed switch 43 is monitored so that threaded member 34 is moved in the desired direction for a predetermined number of pulses from reed switch 43. The downtilt for any other array may be changed in the same manner. if the controller is locked a user may view an angle of downtilt but will not be able to alter the angle.
If the “measure array” option is selected the present angle of downtilt of the antenna may be determined. Upon selecting the “measure tilt” function from the base menu, the following display appears:
The up/down buttons may be used to select the desired array. The enter key will accept the selected array. To measure the actual angle of downtilt controller 80 drives a motor 41 of an array to drive member 34 to the right. Motor 41 is driven until threaded member 34 abuts switch 46. The controller 80 counts the number of pulses from reed switch 43 to determine how far threaded portion 34 has traveled. At the extreme right position the controller 80 determines and displays the angle of downtilt, calculated in accordance with the number of pulses connected from reed switch 43. The controller 80 then drives threaded member 34 back in the opposite direction for the same number of pulses from reed switch 43 so that it returns to the same position. The angle of downtilt for each antenna may be stored in memory of controller 80. This value will be updated whenever the actual angle of downtilt is measured in this way. The “measure tilt” function may not be used if the controller is locked.
Controller 80 may include tables in memory containing the number of pulses from reed switch 43 that must be counted for threaded member 34 to achieve each desired degree of downtilt. This may be stored as a table containing the number of pulses for each required degree of downtilt, which may be in 0.1° steps. This approach ensures that any non-linearities of the antenna may be compensated for as the tables will give the actual amount of movement required to achieve a desired downtilt for a given antenna.
The “enable array” function may be used to enable each array when installed. The controller 80 will be prevented from moving any array that has not been enabled. Controller 80 will record in memory which arrays have been enabled. The “disable array” function may be used to disable arrays in a similar manner.
The “lock controls” function may be used to lock the controller once adjustment has been made. A “rack error” signal may be displayed if the array has not operated correctly. This will indicate that an operator should inspect the array.
Adjustment of the array may also be performed remotely. Controller 80 may be connected to modem 86 via serial line 87 which may connect via telephone line 88 to a central controller 89. Alternatively, the controller 80 may be connected to a central controller 89 via a radio link etc. The functions previously discussed may be effected remotely at central controller 89. In a computer controlled system adjustments may be made by a computer without operator intervention. In this way, the system can be integrated as part of a control strategy for a cellular base station. For example, a remote control centre 89 may adjust the downtilt of antennas at a cellular base station remotely to adjust the size of the cell in response to traffic demand. It will be appreciated that the capability to continuously and remotely control the electrical downtilt of a number of antenna of a cellular base station may be utilised in a number of control strategies.
Central controller 89 may be a computer, such as an IBM compatible PC running a windows based software program. A main screen of the program may show information regarding the antenna under control as follows:
The antennas may be arranged in groups at each site. Group 1 for example contains antennas 1, 2 and 3. The following information about each antenna is given:
If an antenna is in a “fault” condition then it may not be adjusted and if a user clicks on a mouse when that antenna is highlighted a dialogue box will appear instructing the user to clear the fault before adjusting the antenna.
Each antenna also includes a field indicating the status of the antenna as follows:
When adjusting, measuring or nudging an antenna a further dialogue box may appear describing the action that has been instructed and asking a user to confirm that the action should be taken. This safeguards against undesired commands being carried out.
Information for a site may be stored in a file which can be recalled when the antenna is to be monitored or adjusted again. It will be appreciated that the software may be modified for any required control application.
Controller 80 may be a fixed controller installed in the base of an antenna site or could be a portable control unit which is plugged into connectors from control lines 78.
Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to integers or components having known equivalents then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.
Although this invention has been described by way of example it is to be appreciated that improvements and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention.
Industrial Applicability
The present invention may find particular application in antenna systems, such as those used in cellular communication systems.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
264864 | Nov 1994 | NZ | national |
272778 | Aug 1995 | NZ | national |
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/713,614, filed Nov. 15, 2000, entitled Antenna Control System, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,346,924, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/817,445, filed Oct. 16, 1995, entitled Antenna Control System, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,198,458 B1.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2041600 | Friis | May 1936 | A |
2239775 | Bruce | Apr 1941 | A |
2245660 | Feldman et al. | Jun 1941 | A |
2247666 | Potter | Jul 1941 | A |
2432134 | Bagnall | Dec 1947 | A |
2502359 | Wheeler | Mar 1950 | A |
2540696 | Smith, Jr. | Feb 1951 | A |
2596966 | Lindsay, Jr. | May 1952 | A |
2648000 | White | Aug 1953 | A |
2773254 | Engelmann | Dec 1956 | A |
2836814 | Nail | May 1958 | A |
2961620 | Sommers | Nov 1960 | A |
2968808 | Russell | Jan 1961 | A |
3032759 | Ashby | May 1962 | A |
3032763 | Sletten | May 1962 | A |
3255450 | Butler | Jun 1966 | A |
3277481 | Robin et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3522558 | Stafford et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3940770 | Fassett et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3969729 | Nemit | Jul 1976 | A |
4129872 | Toman | Dec 1978 | A |
4176354 | Hsiao et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4241352 | Alspaugh et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4249181 | Lee | Feb 1981 | A |
4427984 | Anderson | Jan 1984 | A |
4451699 | Gruenberg | May 1984 | A |
4532518 | Gaglione et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4564824 | Boyd, Jr. | Jan 1986 | A |
4575697 | Rao et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4652887 | Cresswell | Mar 1987 | A |
4714930 | Winter et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4717918 | Finken | Jan 1988 | A |
4768001 | Chan-Son-Lint et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4779097 | Morchin | Oct 1988 | A |
4788515 | Wong et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4791428 | Anderson | Dec 1988 | A |
4804899 | Wurdack et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4814774 | Herczfeld | Mar 1989 | A |
4821596 | Eklund | Apr 1989 | A |
4843355 | Knorr | Jun 1989 | A |
4881082 | Graziano | Nov 1989 | A |
4994813 | Shiramatsu et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5081463 | Hariu et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5089824 | Uematsu et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5093923 | Leslie | Mar 1992 | A |
5115217 | McGrath et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117503 | Olson | May 1992 | A |
5162803 | Chen | Nov 1992 | A |
5170140 | Lowe et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175556 | Berkowitz | Dec 1992 | A |
5181042 | Kaise et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184140 | Hariu et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5214364 | Perdue et al. | May 1993 | A |
5227806 | Eguchi | Jul 1993 | A |
5241319 | Shimizu | Aug 1993 | A |
5274382 | Wills et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281974 | Kuramoto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5300935 | Yu | Apr 1994 | A |
5440318 | Butland et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5463401 | Iwasaki | Oct 1995 | A |
5488737 | Harbin et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5504466 | Chan-Son-Lint et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512914 | Hadzoglou et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521604 | Yamashita | May 1996 | A |
5551060 | Fujii et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5583514 | Fulop | Dec 1996 | A |
5596329 | Searle et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5610617 | Gans et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617103 | Koscica et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621752 | Antonio et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623270 | Kempkes et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5659886 | Taira et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661488 | Kudo | Aug 1997 | A |
5771017 | Dean et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5801600 | Butland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805996 | Salmela | Sep 1998 | A |
5809395 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818385 | Bartholomew | Oct 1998 | A |
5860056 | Pond | Jan 1999 | A |
6198458 | Heinz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6346924 | Heinz et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
A-3874693 | Jul 1993 | AU |
B-3874693 | Jul 1993 | AU |
4162593 | Jan 1994 | AU |
B-4162593 | Jan 1994 | AU |
B-8005794 | May 1995 | AU |
3322-986 | Jun 1983 | DE |
3323-234 | Jun 1983 | DE |
3323 234 | Oct 1985 | DE |
137-562 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0 137 562 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0 156 294 | Oct 1985 | EP |
241-153 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0 241 153 | Oct 1987 | EP |
357-165 | Aug 1988 | EP |
398-637 | May 1989 | EP |
0 357 165 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 398 637 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0 423 512 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0 531 090 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 540 387 | May 1993 | EP |
0 575 808 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 588 179 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 593 822 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 593 822 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 595 726 | May 1994 | EP |
0 618 639 | May 1994 | EP |
0 616 741 | Sep 1994 | EP |
2 581 254 | Oct 1986 | FR |
2 581 255 | Oct 1986 | FR |
2 706 680 | Dec 1994 | FR |
1 314 693 | Apr 1973 | GB |
2 035700 | Jun 1980 | GB |
2 158 996 | Nov 1985 | GB |
2 159 333 | Nov 1985 | GB |
2 165 397 | Apr 1986 | GB |
2 196 484 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2 205 946 | Dec 1988 | GB |
2 232 536 | Dec 1990 | GB |
61-172411 | Aug 1986 | JP |
63-296402 | Dec 1988 | JP |
1-120906 | May 1989 | JP |
2-121504 | May 1990 | JP |
2-174302 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-174302 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2-174402 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-174402 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-174403 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2-290306 | Nov 1990 | JP |
4-286407 | Oct 1992 | JP |
4-320121 | Nov 1992 | JP |
4-320122 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-37222 | Feb 1993 | JP |
5-75340 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-121902 | May 1993 | JP |
5-121915 | May 1993 | JP |
05-121915 | May 1993 | JP |
5-191129 | Jul 1993 | JP |
6-140985 | May 1994 | JP |
6-196927 | Jul 1994 | JP |
8-196927 | Jul 1994 | JP |
6-260823 | Sep 1994 | JP |
6-326501 | Nov 1994 | JP |
264864 | Nov 1994 | NZ |
272778 | Aug 1995 | NZ |
WO 8808621 | Nov 1988 | WO |
WO 8907837 | Aug 1989 | WO |
WO 9216061 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 9312587 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9510862 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9528747 | Oct 1995 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US02/01993, which is a related patent application. |
Cheston, T.C., “Beam Steering of Planar Phased Arrays” (Phased Array Antennas, Arthur A. Oliver (ed.), p. 219-220, Artech House, Inc. 1992). |
Lovis, Dietrich, “Structure and emission properties of an electronically controlled secondary radar antenna” (NIG Technical Reports V. 57 p. 161-165, Bad Neuheim conference, Mar. 8-11, 1997). |
Strickland, Peter, “Microstrip Base Station Antennas for Cellular Communications” (IEEE CH2944-7/91/0000/0166, p. 166-171, 1991). |
“900 MHz Base Station Antennas for Mobile Communication” (Kathrein). |
Variable-Elevation Beam-Aerial Systems for 1½ Metres, Journal IEE Part IIIA, vol. 93, 1946, Bacon, G.E. |
Radar Antennas, Bell Systems Technical Journal, vol. 28, Apr. 1947, pp. 219 to 317, Friis, H.T. and Lewis, W.D. |
The Sydney University Cross-Type Radio Telescope, Proceedings of the IRE Australia, Feb. 1963, pp. 156 to 165, Mills, B.Y., et al. |
“Microwave Scanning Systems” published about 1985, pp. 48 to 131. |
“Low Sidelobe and Titled Beam Base-Station Antennas for Smaller-Cell Systems,” published in or about 1989, Yarriada & Kijima, NTT Radio Communication Systems Laboratories, pp. 138 to 141. |
“Electrical Downtilt Through Beam-Steering versus Mechanical Downtilt,” G. Wilson, published May 18, 1992, pp. 1-4. |
Mobile Telephone Panel Array (MTPA) Antenna: Field Adjustable Downtilt Models published in Australia on or about May 4, 1994. |
Mobile Telephone and Panel Array (MTPA) Antenna: VARITILT Continuously Variable Electrical Downtilt Models (including specifications sheet) published in Australia on or about Sep. 1994. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 95 93 3674 dated Jan. 9, 1999. |
International Search Report for PCT/NZ 95/00106 mailed Jan. 23, 1998. |
2006 Notification of Acceptance of the Request for Invalidation re CN 95 196 544.1 (English translation). |
Jun. 14, 2007 Decision on Examination of the Request for Invalidation re CN Appl. No. 95 196 544.1 (w/English translation). |
2008 Decision of Beijing First Intermediate Court of People's Republic of China re CN Appl. No. CN 95 196 544.1 (w/English summary). |
2008 Administrative Judgment (of Beijing Higher Court) re CN Appl. No. CN Appl. No. CN 95 196 544.1 (English translation). |
Apr. 20, 11 Notification of Acceptance of the Request for Invalidation re CN 02 118 420.8 (English translation). |
G.E. Bacon, “Variable-Elevation Beam-Aerial Systems for 1½meters,” Journal IEE (vol. 93, Feb. 11, 1946). |
G.A.E. Crone et al., “Technology Advances in Reconfigurable Contoured Beam Reflector Antennas in Europe,” Proc. 13th AIAA Int'l Conference on Communications Satellite Systems (pp. 255-263 1990). |
H.T. Friis et al., “Radar Antennas,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. XXVI, No. 2, pp. 218-317 (Apr. 1947). |
B. Heath, “Design Specification for Premium Antenna with EDT and AS” (Australia Telecom Sep. 1993). |
W.H. Kummer, “Feeding and Phase Scanning,” Microwave Scanning Antennas (ed. R.C. Hansen, vol. III Array Systems, pp. 2-9, 48-85, 114-121, 128-131 (Academic Press 1966). |
Dietrich Louis, “Structure and Emission Properties of an Electrically Controlled Secondary Radar Antenna” NIG Technical Reports, vol. 57, pp. 161-165 (Mar. 1977) (w/English translation). |
B.Y. Mills et al., “The Sydney University Cross-type Radio Telescope,” Proceedings of the I.R.E. Australia (pp. 156-163 Feb. 1963). |
A. Okuyama et al., “Base-Station Antenna Systems for Car and Handheld Cellular Phones” Mitsubishi Denki Giho vol. 68 No. 12 pp. 23-26 (1994) (w/Enqlish Abstract). |
Peter Strickland et al., “Microstrip Base Station Antennas for Cellular Communications” (IEEE 1991). |
Gottfried Vogt, An Electronic Method for Steering the Beam and Polarization of HF Antennas, IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (pp. 193-200 Mar. 1962). |
Gary Wilson, “Electrical Downtilt Through Beam-Steering Versus Mechanical Downtilt” (IEEE May 18, 1992). |
Yoshihide Yamada et al., Law Sidelobe and Tilted Beam Base-Station Antennas for Smaller-Cell Systems (IEEE 1989). |
“CEC-901 Cellular Antenna Controller User's Manual” (CAL Corp Apr. 2, 1992). |
“Electrically Tilted Panel Antennas” (Radio Frequency Systems Pty Ltd Australia, IMCE Engineering Meeting, Mar. 1993). |
“Field Adiustable Downtilt Models” (Deltec May 1994). |
“Mobile Telephone Panel Array (MTPA) Antenna Varitilt Continuously Variable Electrical Downtilt Models” (Deltec Sep. 1994). |
“Second Generation Variable Electrical Tilt Panel Antenna” (Radio Frequency Systems Pty Ltd Australia, CTIA Technical Meeting, Mar. 1994). |
Sumitomo Electric Technical Review No. 143 pp. 136-139 (Sep. 1993 (w/English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020113750 A1 | Aug 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09713614 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 10025155 | US | |
Parent | 08817445 | Apr 1997 | US |
Child | 09713614 | US |