This application hereby claims priority from German Application DE 10 2007 032 048.7 filed on Jul. 10, 2007, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
At least one embodiment of the invention relates to an antenna diversity system for relatively broadband broadcast reception in vehicles such as motor vehicles. The term Broad band such as mobile broadband can be used to describe various types of wireless high-speed internet access through a portable modem, telephone or other device. Examples of different broadband network standards that may be used, include EV-DO, WiMAX, UMTS/HSPA, or some portable satellite-based systems.
In this case, multi-path propagation leads to narrowing of the bandwidth of the channel from the transmitter antenna to the mobile receiver if the path differences of the electromagnetic wave bundles that arrive at the reception location are not small enough to be ignored. Therefore, there is a dependence in frequency at a reception location that is similar to the one observed at a fixed frequency over the driving path. This dependence is illustrated in
Particularly in the case of relatively broadband broadcast reception, whose channel width is greater than the bandwidth of the transmission channel as a result of multi-path reception, this phenomenon leads to interference that is known from television reception in vehicles.
Nevertheless, the disadvantage remains that the video signal components that lie far away from the video carrier are reproduced only deficiently. In the case of digitally modulated, relatively broadband transmission methods, in particular—such as the DVBT method (Digital Video Broadcasting Terrestrial) and the DAB method (Digital Audio Broadcasting)—the loss due to non-detectable symbols at elevated bit error rates frequently has such an effect that the broadcast connection breaks off.
Thus, one benefit of the invention is that it creates a particularly efficient antenna diversity system, which avoids the disadvantages connected with an overly low bandwidth of the transmission channel, to a great extent.
The particular advantage of an antenna diversity system according to one embodiment of the invention comprises in making do with only one reception tuner and being able to select one signal from a plurality of antenna signals A1, A2, . . . AN, with great probability, whose signal components lie above the level necessary for interference-free reception, over the entire channel bandwidth B. This advantage is particularly decisive for transmission according to the modern OFDM methods (orthogonal frequency division multiplexing), such as in the case of television transmissions according to the DVBT method and radio transmissions according to the DAB method. In both cases, the signals are transmitted by means of a plurality of sub-carriers disposed equidistantly in frequency and MPSK-modulated (i.e. BPSK, QPSK, 8PSK, etc.), in each instance. In this connection, modulated sub-carriers according to the QPSK method (quadrature phase shift keying) or also according to the QAM method (quadrature amplitude modulation) are primarily used. In this connection, the channel bandwidth B of a DVBT signal with approximately 6700 sub-carriers, for example, comes to approximately 7.5 MHz. The channel bandwidth B for a DAB signal with approximately 1500 sub-carriers having a distance of lkHz comes to approximately 1.5 MHz.
It turns out that the assured bandwidth of the transmission channel from the transmission antenna to the mobile receiver, in the case of Rayleigh distribution, is not less than 0.6 MHz if the running path differences are not greater than 100 m. However, this bandwidth is very small as compared with the requirements for mobile digital TV reception, and also for digital radio reception.
Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed as an illustration only and not as a definition of the limits of the invention.
In the drawings, wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views:
Referring to the drawings,
Thus, with this design it is possible with great likelihood, in each instance, to select an antenna signal from a plurality of available antenna signals A1, A2, . . . AN, in terms of diversity, in such a manner that none of the received sub-carriers goes below the detectability threshold or to select that antenna signal with a minimum detect ability—errors respectively.
This is achieved, in that reception signal 17 that is present in receiver 3 is passed to diversity processor 4, at a relatively great frequency bandwidth B, preferably in the IF frequency plane, to determine the signal quality of reception signal 17, whose frequency bandwidth B is divided up into frequency intervals Δf. An example of signal quality is explained in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,236,372 to Lindenmeier et al, which issued on May 22, 2001, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In this connection, the frequency bandwidth of the frequency intervals Δf can be as large as necessary, but must be selected to be smaller than the expected bandwidth of the transmission channel. In this way, the levels of the frequency components of reception signal 17 are essentially constant within the frequency intervals Δf, at given reflection conditions, in each instance. A frequency-interval-selective level detection 5 is present in diversity processor 4, which detection separately detects the components of reception signal 17 that occur in the frequency intervals, as frequency-interval-specific level values 11. These components of reception signal 17 are separately compared with a signal level threshold 7 that is required for interference-free reception, in a frequency-interval-selective level evaluation 6, and the interference rate 13 of broadband reception signal 17 is determined by means of evaluation of these measurements over all the frequency intervals Δf. If errors occur, a different reception signal 17, in terms of diversity, is passed to receiver 3, by means of a signal to signal selection switch 2. There is then the possibility of selecting a HF signal 24 having the lowest interference rate 13 in diversity processor 4, by means of selectively switching on all the available antenna signals.
In the case of TV signals according to the DVBT method, for phase-correct detection of the sub-carriers of the system, for example 489 pilot carriers P are transmitted at a frequency distance of 16 kHz over the entire channel bandwidth. This frequency distance of Δf=16 kHz is particularly suitable for establishing the frequency intervals according to at least one embodiment of the present invention, whereby the level of each received pilot carrier P is treated as a frequency-interval-specific level value 11 according to at least one embodiment of the invention.
Pd=(pe)n
In a manner analogous to this, in the case of reception of DAB radio signals, the frequency intervals Δf are formed by the plurality of sub-carriers, and the frequency-interval-specific level values 11 of the frequency intervals Δf=approximately 1 kHz defined in this manner are detected by means of the level values of the sub-carriers.
A particular advantage of an antenna diversity system according to at least one embodiment of the invention results from the fact that the diversity efficiency can be further increased, in extremely cost-advantageous manner, by means of formation of linear combinations of the reception signals of the antennas. In this connection, means for phase rotation and amplitude configuration can advantageously be used.
In another advantageous embodiment, the output signals of the frequency-interval-selective level evaluation 6 can be configured as binary signals, and passed to the interference rate determination of the reception signal 17. There, the number of sub-carriers with interference in the case of digital modulation can be determined, for example, in the simplest embodiment. From this, the interference rate 13 of the reception signal 17 can therefore be indicated directly by means of evaluation of the binary signals.
The determination of the interference rate 13 in combination with updating of an advantageously switched-through reception signal 17 can take place, in steps that follow one another closely in time, whereby the time intervals must be selected to be short enough so that the driving path traveled within such an interval does not exceed the length λ/10, if at all possible. The steps that follow one another within a short time are repeatedly initiated, in simple manner, by means of a clock generator 15, by means of the cycle signal 16 of which the determination of the interference rate 13 repeatedly takes place. In order to prevent the cycle signal 16 from occurring during the symbol duration, it is advantageous, to derive the cycle signal 16 from the symbol cycle of the OFDM signal. The DVBT symbol duration, including the guard interval, amounts to approximately 1 ms, depending on the design of the system, for example in 8k mode. It is particularly advantageous, to set up switchover of the antenna signal during the guard interval.
With the goal of establishing a ranking list with regard to the reception quality of the reception signals 17, an interference rate memory with address signal generation 9 is present in the diversity processor 4, in an advantageous embodiment of the invention. The interference rate 13 is stored in it, in each instance, and the current interference rate 13, in each instance, is compared with the interference rates 13 that preceded it in time. The most advantageous antenna signal 17 indicated in the ranking list is passed to the signal selection switch 2 using a correspondingly generated address signal 14, so that of the available reception signals 17, i.e. of the corresponding reception signals 17a in the IF plane, the one having the smallest interference 13 is switched through.
One embodiment of the present invention can be used in particularly advantageous manner for the reception of DVBT-modulated signals. For reliable transmission of such a signal, every tenth sub-carrier, for example, is configured as a pilot carrier, whose phase provides the reference phase for phase detection of the sub-carriers that are adjacent in terms of frequency. The frequency distance between two pilot carriers therefore amounts to approximately 10 kHz, and is small enough to make it possible to consider the transmission channel as being constant over this small frequency bandwidth. The sub-carriers that are situated between the pilot carriers in terms of frequency, whose phase contain the data to be transmitted in the case of QPSK modulation—i.e. also in combination with their amplitude in the case of QAM modulation—can be correctly detected, in this connection, even in a reception field in which interference is caused by multi-path propagation, as long as the pilot carriers are received at a sufficiently great level. A processor for evaluation of these signals is present in every DVBT receiver, which processor can be configured, in advantageous manner, to produce a diversity processor 4 according to at least one embodiment of the present invention, by making some additions that are not very complicated. In this connection, the frequency intervals Δf are formed by the plurality of the pilot carriers disposed at the frequency interval Δf, and the frequency-interval-specific level values 11 of the frequency intervals Δf are determined by means of the level values of the pilot carriers P. The I and Q components are present for evaluating the phase of the pilot carriers P; for example, the amplitude values of the pilot carriers are determined from them, and used to assess the interference rate 13, according to at least one embodiment of the invention.
The amplitude value of a pilot carrier that is determined at reception can be put into relation, in simple manner, with the minimum value that is required for error-free detection of the signal content of the sub-carriers positioned between two pilot carriers, in each instance, in the frequency interval Δf of 10 kHz frequency bandwidth, for example. The interference rate 13 determined for the pilot carriers therefore corresponds to the interference rate of the entire digital reception signal in the reception channel B.
The digital evaluation of the amplitudes of the pilot carriers is, of course, connected with a waiting time (latency), which generally increases with the number of pilot carriers to be detected. In the interests of the least possible circuitry expenditure in connection with the smallest possible waiting time, it is therefore advantageous to select the bandwidth of the frequency intervals Δf to be greater—for example 50 kHz—and to use the amplitude of only every fifth pilot carrier, for example, as the frequency-interval-specific level value 11 to determine the interference rate 13 of the reception signal 17.
In
Receiver 3 for the OFDM broadcasting systems described above, is generally configured as a superimposition receiver with oscillator signal 27 (See
In the antenna diversity system in
In an exemplary embodiment of such a system, the oscillator signal 27 is passed to multi-antenna system 1 by way of a frequency doubler 25, an oscillator frequency high-pass 29, and by way of high-frequency line 10, and in the system, it is passed to a frequency converter 34a for superimposition with the VCO signal 37 by way of frequency divider 26, in the original frequency position. The microcontroller 21 controls the voltage-controlled oscillator 33 with reference oscillator 32 step by step, in such a manner that the superimposition with the oscillator signal 27 in the frequency converter 34a results in the frequency interval selection signal 35, which—again superimposed with the antenna signal at the output of the signal pre-selection switch 2a in the frequency converter 34b-yields the frequency-interval-specific IF signal 36. At the output of the IF narrowband band-pass 18b, the frequency-interval-specific level values 11 can be determined by the microcontroller 21, in each instance. The greater the bandwidth of the frequency interval Δf is selected to be, the faster the frequency-interval-specific level values 11 can be determined, and the diversity system can be used at an all the greater driving speed and smaller wavelength of the HF reception signals. On the other hand, the criterion for the selection of an advantageous antenna signal A1 . . . AN, derived from the frequency-level-specific level values 11, becomes less accurate with an increasing bandwidth of the frequency intervals Δf. In practice, it has been shown that the bandwidth of the IF narrowband band-pass 18b should therefore not be selected to be greater than 1.5 MHz for a DVBT system. For the diversity system described in connection with
To obtain the early data concerning the signal quality of an antenna signal A1, A2, . . . AN, as described above, the frequency-interval-specific IF signal 36 is passed to an IF broadband band-pass 18a having the frequency bandwidth of the reception channel B. In order to determine the signal power in the reception channel B, the frequency interval selection signal 35 is adjusted to the frequency of the oscillator signal 27, over the duration of the measurement process, so that the HF-channel-specific level value 11a is present at the output of the IF broadband band-pass 18a, for an evaluation in the microcontroller 21.
The antenna diversity system in
Accordingly while only a few embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it is obvious that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 032 048 | Jul 2007 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3942119 | Meinke et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4070677 | Meinke et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4095228 | Meinke et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4602260 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4752968 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4791426 | Lindenmeier et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4914446 | Lindenmeier et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5029308 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5049892 | Lindenmeier et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5097270 | Lindenmeier et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5138330 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5266960 | Lindenmeier et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5289197 | Lindenmeier et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5313660 | Lindenmeier et al. | May 1994 | A |
5589839 | Lindenmeier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5619214 | Lindenmeier et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5801663 | Lindenmeier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818394 | Aminzadeh et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826179 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5850198 | Lindenmeier et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5905469 | Lindenmeier et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926141 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929812 | Aminzadeh | Jul 1999 | A |
5949498 | Rudolph | Sep 1999 | A |
5973648 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6011962 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6123550 | Burkert et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130645 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140969 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169888 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184837 | Lindenmeier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188447 | Rudolph et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218997 | Lindenmeier et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219532 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236372 | Lindenmeier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6313799 | Thimm et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317096 | Daginnus et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6377221 | Lindenmeier et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400334 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421532 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430404 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6574460 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603434 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6603435 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611677 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633258 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653982 | Lindenmeier et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6768457 | Lindenmeier | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6888508 | Lindenmeier | May 2005 | B2 |
6911946 | Lindenmeier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917340 | Lindenmeier | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925293 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927735 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956533 | Lindenmeier | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7127218 | Lindenmeier | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7277684 | Kushima et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7403167 | Probst et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7555277 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564416 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7702051 | Lindenmeier et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7936852 | Lindenmeier | May 2011 | B2 |
8050639 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010016478 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020118138 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126055 | Lindenmeier et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154059 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171600 | Lindenmeier et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196183 | Lindenmeier | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030164802 | Lindenmeier | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040113854 | Lindenmeier | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040160373 | Lindenmeier | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164912 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183737 | Lindenmeier | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192242 | Dinur et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198274 | Lindenmeier | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060082494 | Deininger et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060114146 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060182201 | Lindenmeier et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070058761 | Lindenmeier | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070140389 | Lindenmeier et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080064356 | Khayrallah | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080218422 | Lindenmeier et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080248770 | Schultz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260079 | Lindenmeier et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080293371 | Kishigami et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090036074 | Lindenmeier et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090073072 | Lindenmeier et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100066618 | Heuer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,969, filed Jan. 19, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,318, filed Mar. 3, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,236, filed May 24, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090042529 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |