This application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/GB2012/053196 filed 19 Dec. 2012 which designated the U.S. and claims priority to GB 1122324.5 filed 23 Dec. 2011, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to the field of compact antenna elements and miniaturised antenna devices comprising such elements.
Over the past few years, there has been an increasing worldwide research interest in multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) systems, also known as multiple-element antenna (MEA) systems, as they have been shown to have the potential for improved capacity, spectral efficiency and reliability as compared to single-antenna communication systems. MIMO technology is a breakthrough in the field of modern wireless communications, and is poised to play a significant role in the implementation of next generation's wireless products and networks.
MIMO systems consist of multiple antennas on both the transmitter and receiver ends. It is regarded as an extension to Smart Antenna systems, which consist of multiple antennas controlled by algorithms optimising their spectral and spatial efficiency.
The antenna is an extremely important component in any wireless appliance because it transmits and receives radio waves. An antenna operates as a matching device from a transmission line to free space and vice versa. An ideal antenna radiates the entire power incident from the transmission line feeding the antenna from one or more predetermined direction. Performance of the antenna dictates performance of most wireless devices and hence is a critical part of the system.
In current mobile and handheld devices, miniaturised antennas are formed by providing conductive patches and or traces on one of both sides of an insulating (or electric) substrate. The substrate may be part of a circuit board carrying other components, or part of the housing or chassis. This type of antenna may be regarded as a patch antenna, optionally with microstrip antenna features.
A number of antennas and RF circuits may be necessary to cover all the bands from 700 MHz up to 5 GHz, appropriate for applications ranging from GSM, CDMA, 3G, WiFi, Bluetooth and GPS. This not only increases the real estate required but also increases the chance of free space coupling and interference between antennas, thereby reducing the efficiency of the antenna.
Spiral antennas are well known in the art as means to provide coverage over a broad range of frequencies. The most popular configurations in the past have been Archimedean and Log spiral antennas. These have rarely made it to mobile devices in a form that has been easy to integrate either onto circuits or the chassis.
A miniaturised spiral antenna element is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,791,497 (WO 02/29928A2), wherein the spiral antenna exists on one side of a substrate, whilst the second surface contains a planar balun and feed point which feeds the antenna element through a slot. This is said to cover a range of 800 MHz to 3 GHz. Slow wave structures are introduced as part of the spiral wind, which are said to make the device geometrically smaller for the same wavelength.
On the other hand, U.S. Pat. No. 6,295,029 B1 describes a microstrip antenna element which is formed as a rectangular spiral. This enables miniaturisation and maintains the broadband characteristics. At the end of the antenna an open stub is formed to assist in antenna matching. A ground plane for this antenna element is on the same side as the antenna, and a hole is punched in the ground to provide frequency shifting and a smaller size antenna element. However there is no discussion of the gain of the antenna, nor the impact of any neighbouring devices or other antenna elements that may affect the efficiency of the antenna element concerned.
WO 03/094293A1 discloses a miniaturised resonant slot antenna element which is fed from the back side of the substrate. Such a design is said to enhance impedance matching and reduce the physical size of the antenna, but may not improve the bandwidth of the antenna. US20060038724 describes a modified version of the same antenna, again fed from the back side of the antenna, with additional sub-slots, running clockwise and counter-clockwise, to improve the bandwidth of the antenna. The two multiple spiral slot antenna elements seen above mention the reduction of antenna size and slight improvement in the bandwidth. However it is believed that, when applied in a MIMO configuration, these implementations will not be efficient enough to provide a higher bandwidth as expected in modern portable communication systems.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,892,482 describes a circuit meant to reduce the mutual coupling between two patch antennas in an antenna for a cellular radio base station. A capacitor-inductor-capacitor network is used to couple neighbouring patch elements together, so as to inject into each one a signal in antiphase to that in its neighbour.
MIMO is expected to be a key technology to deliver the next generations of mobile devices, wherein a large number of protocols will be expected to run in parallel. This is envisaged to enable higher throughput of the devices within the limited channel bandwidth. The primary criteria of the antenna in these devices will be to reduce the co-channel interference and free-space coupling, also known as mutual coupling. There is another parameter known as envelope correlation, or cross correlation, which couples the radiation pattern of two such antennas when placed in proximity. The cross correlation can be reduced by decoupling the polarisation and placement of the antennas and by reduction of the beam width of individual antennas so they do not couple in free space, again relating to mutual coupling. However, for miniature equipment such as a mobile phone, the freedom of placement is very limited. Current design guidance is to place antenna elements at least a half wavelength apart in order to avoid grating lobes in the radiation pattern. A well-known reference in this area is R. King (1958) “Linear arrays: Currents, impedances, and fields, I”.
A particular challenge is therefore to reduce the electromagnetic interaction in the near field with neighbouring antenna elements or devices which may be amplifiers, filters, GPS receivers, camera modules, casings, battery modules, memory, sensors, and other electronic components.
WO2011102143(A1) proposes to use additional circuitry to try and adjust the mutual coupling between two antennas. The present inventors prefer to mitigate the need for such external circuitry by virtue of the antenna design itself.
The invention provides antenna elements and devices as defined in the appended claims.
The spiral slot, reduces the Q of the antenna, thereby increasing its bandwidth and reducing the antenna's susceptibility to interference and mutual coupling, whilst still maintaining an omnidirectional pattern. Further adjustment of frequency response can be made by secondary slots in the active patch, along with the location of the ground lines and notches.
The parasitic ground enables an enhanced antenna radiation pattern enabling diversity and a reduced mutual coupling in the near field, thereby allowing compact antenna arrays. The antenna in one embodiment consists of a linear polarised patch antenna, with a spiral slot and balanced ground feed.
Further use of a parasitic ground patch with a slot or aperture increases directivity, thereby allowing size reduction of multi-element antenna devices, and enhances the gain of the antenna. In embodiments illustrated below, the ground patch is not connected conductively to the signal ground, only passively (parasitically) connected.
Compact antenna elements according to the invention can be designed for mobile devices to cover a wide frequency range, for example from 400 MHz up to 8.4 GHz, or even down to 100 MHz and/or up to 60 or 80 GHz.
Where the description and claims refer to “central” and “peripheral” portions of a patch, it is to be understood that no strict definition of “central” applies. The central portion is merely a portion of the patch that is generally surrounded by an outer or peripheral portion. Similarly, where the description and claims refer to a conductor as a “strip”, “line” or “patch”, no strict definition of these terms is intended, other than what the context requires.
The present invention will be apparent in its novelty and other characteristics after reading the detailed description and preferred embodiment in reference to the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, by reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
On the front surface shown in
More detail and variations of the ground patch design will be discussed further below. While a generally square patch antenna with square spiral slot is used as an example, this square form is only an example and any rectangular, or more generally polygonal, geometry can be considered as well. Smoother curved shapes are also possible, but rectangular/polygonal designs tend to be easier to design and manufacture. While a spiral slot is used in the examples, the principles of the invention can be extended to other forms of convoluted slot, such as serpentine or linear or segmented linear.
The active patch of the antenna element has been modified with spiral slot 112 so as to give the antenna element wideband performance. Further, optional modifications to be described later provide not just for the broadband performance but also for an increased gain, a highly directive radiation pattern and reduced mutual coupling between multiple antenna elements. These different embodiments of the antenna element include for example additional slots to give additional frequency response. In the square patch the slot induces the current to cross larger electrical lengths thereby covering larger frequency range. The directions of the currents induced into the device and the aperture are selected in a manner that the electromagnetic waves radiated into space will introduce less mutual coupling amongst other neighbouring device. The thicker external patch formed by portions 110a to 110d protects the inner currents from external sources. The passive (parasitic) ground patch 130 also plays a key role. The ground patch with aperture 132 is strategically placed under the active path, in order to balance the fringing fields and enhance the radiation pattern of the antenna element. The antenna is also balanced fed, using signal ground strips (patches 116, 118), making it less susceptible to proximity effects, and ideal for embedded applications such as handheld mobile devices.
By adjusting the design of the slots in the antenna elements and associated parasitic elements, individual parameters can be varied to provide enhanced performance, suitable for compact antenna arrays. In particular, the directional property of the individual antenna element allows the overall antenna array to have a higher gain, lesser mutual coupling, lesser envelop correlation and large bandwidth from 400 MHz to 8.4 GHz.
By applying the principles described above one can provide a UHF antenna, which is less than 1/16th the size of its traditional counterparts working at the same frequency from 300 MHz up to 3 GHz in UHF (Ultra High Frequency) bands, and 3 GHz up to 30 GHz in SHF (Super High Frequency) bands. This allows for a compact integrated element and element arrays suitable for modern portable communication systems. All this is achieved solely on the basis of patch design and not by having any additional circuitry attached to the antenna. Examples of the novel antenna have been successfully tested in the range 0.3 GHz to over 8 GHz, but the principles of its design can be applied in other frequency ranges. In general terms, we would anticipate covering roughly a decade of frequencies with a single design, for example, 0.3 to 3, 3 to 30 or 8 to 80 GHz. We have examples that cover significantly more than a decade, however. Other forms of convoluted slot are possible. In alternative embodiments, where wide bandwidth is not required, a simpler slot shape could be used, while maintaining the other features and benefits of the embodiments to be described below.
In multi-element applications, the available bandwidth may depend also on an acceptable mutual coupling between elements. Where a lower degree of mutual coupling is desired, then for a given geometry less of the spectrum may lie under that dB threshold.
As explained before, MIMO requires that the elements should have a low mutual coupling less than for example −10 db, −13 dB or −15 dB or −20 dbB. The invention by virtue of its design and control of the radiation pattern enables an ultra wideband characteristics ideal for a smart antenna system. Examples illustrated below provide a mutual coupling of −16 dB to −67 dB, over the entire spectral range of 400 MHz up-to 8.4 GHz. This makes it very interesting for the next generation of mobile MIMO devices. The concept of having the least electromagnetic interaction in the near field and maximum interaction in the far field allow beam forming if desired.
As is known, a single sided patch antenna lacks in bandwidth and has an omni-directional radiation pattern. The addition of a parasitic ground patch or reflector on the back side of the substrate increases the efficiency of radiation (reduces return loss). In some embodiments of the invention the parasitic ground patch 130 is modified to create a slot 132. This allows the designer to blend higher gain and efficiency with a highly directive pattern. A higher directivity means the antenna radiates or focuses its energy in a particular direction compared to the average of all other directions. More focused means less energy wasted in other directions and saves radiated power and reduces noise. In the case of cellular communications, for example, it also allows a particular cell to be chosen in preference to others, and for multiple reflections to be eliminated, ensuring that only one desired signal is selected from a range of interferers.
As a key application for the antenna elements are to be designed is for a modern system which enables MIMO, the inventors have studied the effects of the antenna elements combined into an array form. The active patch without the ground patch exhibits significant coupling between two adjacent antenna elements. However with the modified ground patch and feed structure, the coupling was significantly reduced. Over the entire range from 300 KHz to 3 GHz in one example, the two elements displayed a coupling between −15 dB to −67 dB.
For a typical MIMO application the free space coupling should be low, for example below −10 dB, or even lower and experiments with the novel element have proved that this performance is achievable, even with elements in fairly close proximity.
Consequently, having a preferred balance between a modified slot in the square patch and the ground, leads to a higher directivity, higher gain, and more focused radiation pattern and reduces mutual coupling between a plurality of elements.
There are three main ways of using MIMO systems: spatial multiplexing, beam forming and spatial diversity. Spatial multiplexing is a concept of particular interest, and is the main way MIMO systems differ from smart antenna systems. Beam forming is a concept common to both conventional smart antenna and MIMO systems. It refers to the concentrating of energy towards certain directions in such a way as to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) or signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio (SINR). For example, the receive array can form an array radiation pattern where the main beams are directed towards the transmitters to obtain a higher received signal strength, while nulls are introduced in the directions of interfering signals. This is done by weighting (either in amplitude and/or phase) the signals received by different antenna elements appropriately to maximise the contribution of the desired signal and concurrently minimise that of the interfering signals. Another key concept of smart antenna is spatial diversity, where the use of multiple antenna elements improves the reception/detection of signals. The presence of multiple antenna elements can counteract the effect of random fading due to multipath propagation. As a result, the probability of signal loss decreases exponentially with the number of uncorrelated antenna elements. MIMO systems harness the spatial diversity benefits of array antennas as well. However, MIMO systems have an added advantage over smart antennas in that they can enjoy both transmit and receive diversity gain.
In spatial multiplexing, the transmit data is split or multiplexed into several parallel streams and each stream is transmitted simultaneously across the channel by different transmit antenna elements (or channel Eigen modes, if the channel is known at the transmitter). The signals received on the multiple receiver antennas are thus a combination of the transmit data streams.
“Mutual coupling” refers to the electromagnetic interactions between the elements of an antenna array, or between independent antennas in close proximity to each other. Some of the energy transmitted by a transmit antenna element is transferred to the other elements. Correspondingly, a portion of the energy in the incident field of a receive antenna element is transferred to the nearby elements. As a result, the feed current on each transmit antenna element in an antenna array does not solely consist of the current as when they are transmitting in isolation, but also of the current induced by the other antenna elements in proximity. The same argument follows for the induced current on the receive elements of the array.
Another way of describing the effect of mutual coupling is that the electric field generated by one element alters the current distribution, as well as distorts the radiation/reception pattern of the other elements as compared to their isolated radiation/reception patterns. The amount of mutual coupling depends on the separation between antenna elements. It generally increases the closer the antenna elements are to each other, but the relationship will be complex and frequency-dependent The extent of mutual coupling also depends on the element radiation patterns and the array geometry, for example the relative orientation and location of the antenna elements. The direction of arrival (DOA) of the incident field also affects mutual coupling. Due to this, mutual coupling plays an important factor in the design of smart antennas and multi-element antennas in general.
Referring again to
In embodiments of the invention, it has been mentioned that the elements can be placed closer together than known antenna designs, without undue mutual coupling. For example, the outer dimension W1 of the active patch may be between 10 mm and 20 mm, for example between 14 and 18 mm. The inner dimension W2 may be between one third and three quarters of the outer dimension. The spacing D may be in the range 2-50 mm, for example being less than 50 mm, 40 mm, 30 mm, 25 mm, 20 mm, 15 mm or 10 mm. The spacing D may be less than 2 times the outer dimension W1, or less than 1.5 or 1 times. The spacing may be selected also to provide a mutual coupling across a range of operating frequencies that is less than −10 dB, less than −14 dB or less than −18 dB, for example. The spacing D and/or the pitch P may be less than 0.5 times the wavelength λ at a highest operating frequency for which the antenna is designed (D<=λ/2). At lower operating frequencies, the wavelengths will be longer and so the gaps between element will be much shorter, in wavelength terms. When embodiments of the invention are properly designed, satisfactory mutual coupling performance can be obtained when the spacing D is as low as λ/100, λ/300 or even λ/400. It may be envisaged that an antenna element may operate at several frequency bands in a given product application. The mutual coupling is only an important performance criterion in those bands where smart antenna and/or MIMO functions are being implemented.
In
In each of these variations, we see the active patch of the antenna element being modified with further slots. This helps to extend the UWB characteristics of the antenna element. The position of the slot will define new boundaries and lengths for the electrical path and hence require current to travel further. This forms effectively inner and outer loops or segments of the antenna element, each working as an independent spiral antenna with its own resonant behaviour. Adjusting the position of secondary slots 342 or 352 can tune this resonant behaviour by altering the absolute and relative length of the segments. It also helps to overcome any interference from neighbouring radiating antenna elements thereby reducing the mutual coupling and interference posed by other electrical devices.
Numerous permutations and variations of the features described above can be deployed to customise an antenna element for its particular application. It may be assumed from the above description that elements in an array will be identical, but this is not necessarily the case. The spiral slots, secondary slots, extensions, notches etc. of the active patch and/or the ground patch may be varied according to the position of each element in an array, for example, or to provide different operating bands in a switchable array. Secondary slots can be deployed in the peripheral portion of the ground patch, not only the active patch. The spiral slot in the active patch may be swapped for a different design of convoluted slot.
We can describe an antenna element as ultra wideband (UWB), even if its return loss is unacceptable at some points across the spectrum. A multi-purpose antenna can be designed to carry different signal types which might have widely different frequencies, but parts of the spectrum in between are unused. For the purpose of this description, we can define an UWB antenna or antenna element for example as one having usable spectral regions that are more than 5 GHz apart, or more than two octaves apart. We can define usable regions as those having a return loss better than −7 dB, −9 dB or −10 dB, for example. Examples according to the embodiments described above have two or more regions at least 1 GHz in width, possibly 2 GHz in width. The sub-band B1 with two resonant peaks in it covers a range of more than an octave.
The parasitic ground patch without a slot results in an omnidirectional radiation pattern as shown in
The next few variations will show the effect of additional secondary slots in the active patch of the antenna, of the type shown in
This improved directivity, which may be for example greater than 3 db or greater than 4 dB at a given operating frequency, allows for diversity. It also enables the antennas to be placed closer together so as to create compact antenna arrays. The antennas by virtue of their lower Q are also less susceptible to interference and mutual coupling. As the slot dimension affects the gain and the Q of the antenna, a balance between a higher directivity and a reasonable gain can be achieved through iterative design of the antenna geometry.
The spacing D can be expressed in terms of the free space wavelength λ at a given operating frequency. The spacing D can be as little as λ/400 at the lowest designed operating frequency of the antenna array, and as high as λ/2 at the highest operating frequency. As mentioned already, conventional wisdom would be to separate the elements by at least λ/2 at any operating frequency, so as to avoid undue mutual coupling. Acceptable levels of mutual coupling for a MIMO application or other application might be for example −10 dB, −12 dB, −15 dB or even −20 dB in practice. Where an array has more than two elements, the coupling will exist between every pair of elements, but one would expect that it will generally be strongest between the immediate neighbour elements. This is confirmed in simulation and experiment.
Polarisation is another characteristic of the electromagnetic wave generated from the antenna which then travels in air. Most spiral antennas generate circular polarisation. In our designs as covered by the present application it is possible for a suitable choice of geometric configuration to be chosen to yield the particular polarisation required by a particular communication protocol. For example, linear polarisation, particularly a vertical polarisation is the choice in cellular mobile communication systems, where the plane is normal to the substrate.
Having a vast number of variations is ideal as one can customise the characteristics of the antenna depending on the performance sought. Hence for an omnidirectional element a full ground patch/reflector is utilised, whilst for a highly directional element a slotted ground is utilised.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1122324.5 | Dec 2011 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2012/053196 | 12/19/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/093466 | 6/27/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2429726 | Lewis | Oct 1947 | A |
2524993 | Rumsey | Oct 1950 | A |
2765731 | Edwards | Oct 1956 | A |
2838754 | Bickmore | Jun 1958 | A |
3380052 | Drabowitch et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3441937 | Clasby et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3448455 | Alfandari et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3449751 | Schroeder | Jun 1969 | A |
5038146 | Troychak et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5135341 | Leyder | Aug 1992 | A |
5892482 | Coleman, Jr. et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5963871 | Zhinong et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6112102 | Zhinong | Aug 2000 | A |
6166694 | Ying | Dec 2000 | A |
6181279 | Van Hoozen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6218989 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6285342 | Brady et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295029 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297774 | Chung | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326921 | Egorov et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329962 | Ying | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6343208 | Ying | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353443 | Ying | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6408190 | Ying | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424315 | Glenn et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442400 | Ying et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456250 | Ying et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6501426 | Waterman | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6542122 | Bolin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6650294 | Ying et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653978 | Lahti | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6697020 | Ying | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6791497 | Winebrand | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795023 | Chen | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6906669 | Sabet | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6930640 | Chung | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937206 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950065 | Ying et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975269 | Jecko et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995715 | Ying et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7068227 | Ying | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7095372 | Soler Castany et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7126547 | Kim et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7148850 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202818 | Anguera Pros et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202822 | Baliarda et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7315289 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7362283 | Quintero Illera et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397431 | Baliarda et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7453402 | Rowell et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453404 | Ying | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463199 | Soler Castany et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471246 | Soler Castany et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7554490 | Baliarda et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7639187 | Cabellero et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7688276 | Quintero Illera et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7903034 | Anguera et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7903037 | Gala Gala et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907092 | Soler Castany et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7911394 | Quintero Illera et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920097 | Quintero Illera et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7924226 | Soler Castany et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7928915 | Sanz Arronte et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7932870 | Baliarda et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7999748 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20020135521 | Moore | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020163469 | Waterman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030184476 | Sikina et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193439 | Park | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210192 | Chen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210199 | Sward et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040056812 | Sabet et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080457 | Guo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040189529 | Jecko et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217916 | Quintero Illera et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233109 | Ying et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040245548 | Stockmeier et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050024271 | Ying et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050110688 | Baliarda et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050190106 | Anguera Pros et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219144 | Ying | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231434 | Azadegan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060033664 | Soler Castany et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038724 | Tikhov et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060139211 | Vance et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070046548 | Pros et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080871 | Ying | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070153512 | Hendrie | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070279292 | Shih | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290927 | Rowell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080062049 | Soler Castany et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080129630 | Baliarda et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158069 | Mateus Mendes et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169982 | Mei | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198082 | Soler Castany et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080252536 | Anguera et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090033583 | Ryou et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090085810 | Soler Castany et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090153410 | Chiang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090201211 | Saily | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090224995 | Puente et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090262028 | Mumbru et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100164828 | Huang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171675 | Borja et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100207832 | Ying et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110134010 | Toyao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175776 | Anguera et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 83 824 | Mar 2002 | DE |
69 720 484 | Feb 2004 | DE |
602 05 720 | May 2006 | DE |
602 11 889 | Jun 2007 | DE |
600 33 140 | Oct 2007 | DE |
603 18 199 | Dec 2008 | DE |
0 720 252 | Jul 1996 | EP |
1 085 599 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 093 677 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 095 422 | May 2001 | EP |
1 095 423 | May 2001 | EP |
1 152 487 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1 168 491 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 256 999 | Nov 2002 | EP |
0 929 912 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 443 595 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 471 596 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 215 751 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1 361 623 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 564 842 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 569 298 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 451 899 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1 305 846 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 834 378 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 506 594 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1 436 857 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1 649 542 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1 569 298 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2 133 955 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2 207 238 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2 230 723 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 323 219 | May 2011 | EP |
1 419 597 | Dec 1965 | FR |
2 835 972 | Aug 2003 | FR |
2 373 637 | Sep 2002 | GB |
2 363 911 | Nov 2003 | GB |
09-148836 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2001-203525 | Jul 2001 | JP |
3265953 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2004-260319 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2006-504328 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007-245522 | Sep 2007 | JP |
4008703 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-505501 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-205711 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2011-055027 | Mar 2011 | JP |
10-2011-0031614 | Mar 2011 | KR |
WO 9815028 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9815029 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9925043 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9959221 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0003452 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0003453 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0036700 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0117063 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0191233 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0213307 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0225770 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0229928 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02078124 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03034545 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03047031 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03094293 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03096474 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03096477 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004025778 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004042868 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004066439 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004097977 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004102734 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005015682 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081361 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006034940 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006071270 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006120250 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007000749 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007028448 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007040327 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007128340 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007141187 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008000175 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008076543 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008148569 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009004128 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009023551 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2010094348 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2011073802 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011102143 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report (3 Pages) Dated May 5, 2013, Issued in Corresponding EP Application No. PCT/GB2012/053196. |
Wikipedia Article on Dipole Antenna From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/dipole—antenna, Dec. 21, 2011. |
Pifa Theory From http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/pifa.php, Nov. 22, 2102. |
“Linear arrays: Currents, impedances, and fields, I”, R. King, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation—Trans Antennas Propagat , vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 440-457, 1959. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140361947 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |