The invention relates to an antenna intended to be used in a small-sized and flat radio device. The invention also relates to a radio device which has an antenna according to the invention.
Commercial portable radio devices, such as mobile phones, include models with a total device depth of about one centimeter, for example. Such flat structures are especially the folding parts of flip-type mobile phones. A flip phone has got two parts such that the parts can be folded over, on a hinge, so that they lie on top of each other or adjacently end-to-end in almost the same plane. In the first position, the device is particularly small, and it is in the latter position during connection.
Antennas used in flip phones are normally monopole-type external antennas. Their drawback is the inconvenience generally associated with a protruding structural element. Naturally it would be possible to use internal PIFA-type planar antennas, but the thin structure of the folding parts in the mobile phone would result in the distance between the radiating part and ground plane to be so small that the antenna gain would be unsatisfactory. Furthermore, it would be possible to have an internal monopole-type planar antenna such that the radiating plane does not face the ground plane. In that case the flatness of the device would cause no problem as such, but the electrical characteristics such as matching and antenna gain would again be unsatisfactory. Matching could be improved using an additional circuit, but this would require the use of several discrete components.
It is an object of the invention to eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks associated with the prior art. An antenna according to the invention is characterized in that which is specified in the independent claim 1. A radio device according to the invention is characterized in that which is specified in the independent claim 10. Some advantageous embodiments of the invention are specified in the other claims.
The idea of the invention is basically as follows: Base element of the antenna of a flat radio device is an internal monopole-type conductor. This conductor may be designed such that the harmonic nearest the fundamental resonating frequency can be utilized for providing an upper operating band. In addition to the base element the antenna structure includes a parasitic element which serves as both auxiliary radiator and antenna matching element. Matching is optimized by an inductive structure part which connects the parasitic element to signal ground.
One of the advantages of the invention is that it yields an antenna gain significantly higher than known antenna structures occupying the same space. Another advantage of the invention is that the antenna gain is better compared to known internal monopole antennas. Still another advantage of the invention is that the parasitic element according to the invention can be further used for widening at least one operating band by appropriately offsetting its resonating frequency from the corresponding resonating frequency of the base element. Still another advantage of the invention is that the arrangement according to the invention is simple and incurs relatively little production costs.
The invention will now be described in detail. Reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which
a shows a second example of an antenna according to the invention,
b shows a side view of the antenna of
a shows a third example of an antenna according to the invention,
b shows a side view of the antenna of
a,b show an example of a radio device equipped with an antenna according to the invention,
The parasitic element 120, too, is in this example a rigid conductive wire and it is located below the base element, approximately in the plane of the circuit board 101. The parasitic element is connected at its point G to signal ground GND through an inductive element 125. The latter is a conductive wire making one turn, approximately. Point G divides the parasitic element into two parts B21, B22. The first part B21 together with the inductive element resonates in the lower operating band of the antenna, i.e. in the frequency range used by the first radio system. The second part B22 together with the inductive element resonates in the upper operating band of the antenna, i.e. in the frequency range used by the second radio system. Oscillation energy naturally comes from the field of the base element through electromagnetic coupling. Thus, in this example, the parasitic element functions as an auxiliary radiator and enhances antenna gain in both operating bands of the antenna. The dimensions of the parts of the parasitic element and inductive element 125 are chosen so as to achieve optimal matching for the whole antenna.
By a structure like the one described above the object of the invention, i.e. an antenna which fits into a flat radio device and yet has sufficiently good electrical characteristics, is achieved. This means that the height h of the antenna, i.e. the perpendicular distance of the basic element 110 from the radio device circuit board 101, can be reduced, as compared to an equally good PIFA, for instance.
The parasitic element 120 can also be used to widen one or both of the operating bands. This is done in a manner, known as such, by making the base element resonating frequency and the parasitic element resonating frequency somewhat different. However, the frequency difference has to be limited such that the matching of the antenna remains good enough over the whole range between the resonating frequencies.
a,b show a second example of an antenna according to the invention. In
a,b illustrate a third example of an antenna according to the invention. In
When a flip-type phone is in the closed position, it suffices that signaling between it and a base station works. The results depicted in
Some antenna structures according to the invention were described above. The invention does not limit the shapes and implementation of the antenna elements to those just described. The inventional idea can be applied in different ways within the scope defined by the independent claim 1.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20022198 | Dec 2002 | FI | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2745102 | Norgorden | May 1956 | A |
4827266 | Sato et al. | May 1989 | A |
5966097 | Fukasawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6326921 | Egorov et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6429818 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456249 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480155 | Eggleston | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6535170 | Sawamura et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6657593 | Nagumo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6657595 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6765536 | Phillips et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6819287 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7084831 | Takagi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
20020105471 | Kojima et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20060082514 | Chiang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 923 158 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 162 688 | Dec 2001 | EP |
2001 217631 | Aug 2001 | JP |
WO-0213307 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-02078124 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040113845 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |