This relates antennas, and, more specifically, to antennas for use in with KVM (Keyboard, Video, Mouse) systems.
KVM systems enable one or more remote computers to access and/or control one or more target computers. The term computer as used herein is non-limiting and refers to any processor or collection of processors, including servers (and groups or racks thereof), processors in appliances such as ATM machines, kiosks, cash registers, set-top boxes, PCs and the like. Early KVM systems used wired connections between the remote and target computers. However, more recently, wireless KVM systems have become available, e.g., from Avocent Corporation, the assignee of the present application.
A typical wireless KVM system connecting a target computer to a remote computer uses two radios, one at the target computer (or at a switch connected thereto) and the other at the remote computer. These systems preferably operate using the 802.11a standard. Prior wireless KVM systems used two omni-directional antennas. However, using this type of antenna limited the range of transmission between the two radios (the wireless transmitter and the wireless receiver) to about 100 feet through three walls and up to 300 feet line-of-sight. Notably, the distance range was limited by the antennas used, and not by issues relating to the 802.11a standard. It is desirable and an object of the present invention to extend the distance between the wireless radios (the Transmitter and the Receiver) in a KVM system, especially 802.11a-based wireless systems.
This invention provides 802.11a radios an efficient, circularly polarized directional antenna.
It is a further object of the present invention that the transmitted and received signal modulation should not be distorted or sacrificed in group delay. Accordingly, a type of frequency independent structure that includes a match of 50 ohms across the operating bandwidth was developed and optimized.
FIGS. 4(a)-4(b) are graphs showing the performance of the antenna of
FIGS. 5(a)-5(j) and 6(a)-6(k) depict various packaging structures for the antenna of the present invention;
With reference to
In order to form electrical connections with the antenna 10, when formed on a substrate 12, as shown in
The gain of the antenna is preferably at least 6 dBi and cover all the uni-bands of 802.11a, approximately 5.1 GHz to 5.9 GHz. FIGS. 4(a) and 4(b) show results of operating the antenna at 5.1 GHz and 5.9 GHz frequencies, respectively.
In presently preferred embodiments of the invention, the circularly polarized directional antenna has an average beam width of about 70 degrees making it fairly practical to use for long distance transmission. The antenna's bandwidth covers more than the bandwidth actually used, keeping a very linear plane rotation. The antenna achieves high radiant efficiency due to its low-loss compensating network designed as part of the antenna elements to have a frequency dependant linear rotation function.
The four-arm spiral uses two low cost, independent, wideband matched power dividers for vertical and horizontal polarization directivity balancing. The two power dividers provide a choice of polarizations for a non-symmetric preformed beam width permitting the radios to select the best-fit polarization for transmitting and receiving data.
The conductor physical length of each arm of the antenna planer structure is preferably two wavelengths (of the desired bandwidth). The wavelength center is optimized for best impedance match in the desired bandwidth.
In preferred embodiments, a finite ground plane is used to keep backward reflections and side lobes at minimum for best antenna efficiency and desired beam width angle. FIGS. 4(a)-4(b) show plots of desired beam width for lower and upper uni-band frequencies. The height of the ground plane to the bottom surface of the dielectric material under the conducting arms surfaces, and the center of the wavelength yield high antenna gain, beam angle, and antenna efficiency. In presently preferred embodiments the distance between the antenna and the ground plane is about 0.25 inches. Other embodiments used spacing of up to about 0.5 inches. This particular structure configuration also allows control of the beam angle by changing the height distance of the ground plane to the bottom surface of the dielectric material under the conducting arms surfaces with small effects on antenna efficiency and antenna matching due to its ultra broad band natural design topology. In other words, the spacing between the board and ground plane can be used to adjust the beam width (i.e., gain) and efficiency.
Packaging
One skilled in the art will realize that the spiral antenna of the present invention may be packaged in many ways. However, one packaging of the antenna is described herein with reference to FIGS. 5(a)-5(j).
The back side of mount 32 has four pins 50, 52, 54, 56, one in each of the outer four comers thereof. These pins hold in place a rear cover 58 which may be secured to the mount 32 by four screws. The rear cover 58 may house circuitry and provides connectors 60, 62 to the antenna 10 housed on the mount 32.
The rear cover 58 has two holes 64, 66 therein. Preferably these holes are threaded to enable connection of a ball joint 68 thereto, as shown in
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the PCB 12 has dimensions 2.25 inches by 3.25 inches, and the holes 34, 36, 38, 40 are 0.156 inches in diameter, centered 0.200 inches from the edges of the board.
This structure, with its circular polarization for linear propagation used with an 802.11a communication link, allows minimal distortion, high efficiency and yields longer transmission distances.
The structure uses two coax cables. Each coax cable is used for two functions: independent vertical and horizontal feeds; and as a 180 degree phase shifted broad band transformer to feed each arm of the antenna.
Another packaging embodiment is shown in FIGS. 6(a)-6(k), where FIGS. 6(a)-6(g) show the packaging of a remote-side unit, and FIGS. 6(h)-6(n) show the packaging of a local-side unit.
Operation in a Wireless KVM System
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/948,307 filed Sep. 24, 2004, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10948307 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11429950 | May 2006 | US |