The present invention relates generally to the field of antennas and more specifically to miniature antennas of the kind used in electronic portable and handheld devices to receive and transmit signals in a multi gigahertz range.
The invention is more particularly related to electronic devices such as miniaturized communication modules or antenna in package.
The telecommunications industry has always put an emphasis on the miniaturization of electronic circuits and components. As far as portable and handheld communicating devices are concerned this effort focuses particularly on the antenna which is usually one of the more cumbersome parts of a radio system. Because the trend is also in the reduction of the form factor of these devices the chief difficulty is to maintain antenna performances while they must fit in packages that are becoming increasingly smaller and slimmer. Moreover, all these communicating devices are often bound to embed multiple antennas adapted to the various types of wireless technologies supported which contributes to make their embedding even more difficult to achieve.
Indeed, it is not now infrequent that a cellular phone, e.g.: a GSM mobile phone (Global System for Mobile communications) also embeds a Bluetooth™ short range wireless link to connect the phone to another device; typically, to connect to a personal computer or to a mobile headset. Also, recent high-end mobile phones often include a GPS (Global Positioning System) receiver. And, most of the mobile computers and PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants) are equipped to allow connection to a wireless LAN (Local Area Network), e.g.: a Wi-Fi™ LAN so as to get access to the Internet within buildings and any public areas providing the appropriate wireless access points. Hence, those communicating devices must be equipped of one or more antennas each devised to efficiently operate at a particular wavelength typically in a frequency range as low as 850 MHz (106 Hertz) for the GSM to 5 GHz (109 Hertz), i.e., at wavelengths (λ) ranging respectively from about λ=35 cm (centimeter=10−2 meter) to λ=6 cm.
The standard way of implementing such an antenna is to draw it under the form of metallic traces on the same printed circuit board (PCB) that holds and links the components of any communicating device. An antenna structure commonly in use for that purpose is called IFA for “inverted F antenna” in reference to its overall shape 110, as shown in
Nevertheless, the trend in the evolution of telecommunication components and devices is a constant reduction of their sizes while antennas must still abide by the rules of physics which require that their dimensions remain a finite fraction (¼ for an IFA like antenna) of the wavelength over which they must transmit and receive signals independently of any packaging constraints. A simple scaling of antenna dimensions to fit into a tighter package would indeed seriously impair their performances. This would be very detrimental to the quality and transmission range capability of the communicating device.
More particularly the invention intends to miniaturize systems of the antenna in package type which is a recent technology separate from conventional antenna-on-PCB solutions.
It is thus an object of the present invention to describe a technique that allows a further reduction of the overall space occupied by an antenna without sacrificing any of its electrical and transmission performances.
Further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to the ones skilled in the art upon examination of the following description in reference to the accompanying drawings. It is intended that any additional advantages be incorporated herein.
The invention relates an electronic device comprising:
Possible options of this device are introduced hereafter. They can be cumulated or used alternatively wherein:
The invention also describes an antenna of the antenna-in-package type (AIP). which comprises an upper surface on which a radiating element is provided. The radiating element has an open end and a feeding end. The antenna also comprises an adaptation element. The antenna is characterized in that the adaptation element is provided at an area that is different from the upper surface of the antenna holding the radiating element. The adaptation element is connected, at one end, to an intermediate point of the radiating element and grounded at another end.
The invention also includes following optional features:
The antenna according to one embodiment is of the type antenna-in-package and is selected from a list comprising: IFA, PIFA, monopole and dipole antennas.
An antenna according to one embodiment is such that said adaptation element is integrated into an electronic circuit and is electrically connected to said AIP antenna.
The following detailed description of the invention refers to the accompanying drawings. While the description includes exemplary embodiments, other embodiments are possible, and changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The main parameters of the antenna geometry that allows its best adaptation to the signal wavelength to transmit and receive are shown. In this type of antenna, devised to operate at a quarter of the transmitted wavelength signals, i.e.: about 12 cm in this example of a 2.45 GHz antenna, the length of the folded leg 120 is thus close to 3 cm. The other parameters that participate to the adaptation of the electrical characteristics are: the width of the traces 122; the repetition step of the folded motifs 124; the height of the folded motifs 126; their distance to the PCB ground plane 128. Indeed, to allow the antenna to radiate properly the whole antenna structure 130 is situated off the ground plane 140 of the PCB 150. The grounded end of the antenna is connected, directly or through vias, to the PCB ground plane 145 while the antenna is directly fed, typically from a radio transceiver housed on the PCB, through its intermediate leg 155. This type of structure is often referred to as “antenna in package” (AIP) since it is printed on the same PCB or substrate that holds all the components of the communicating device. Thus, does not require any tuning and skilled personnel when assembled in the communicating box.
The overall behaving of the antenna can be anticipated prior to actual implementation with any of a few commercially available specialized electromagnetic simulation software products that allow an accurate computation of any of its electrical characteristics. One parameter widely used to characterize an antenna is referred to as S11. S11 is one parameter of the so-called scattering parameters (S-parameters) that are commonly used to measure and qualify the behaving of linear passive or active circuits operating at radio frequencies. S-parameters are used to evaluate electrical properties of these circuits such as their gain, return loss, voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR). In a 2-port circuit, S11, one of four possible S-parameters in a 2×2 matrix, measures the input port voltage reflection coefficient. It is generally expressed in decibel (dB) and characterizes the return loss relative to a reference impedance. The lower the value of S11, the better the antenna and the transceiver impedances match. This parameter is plotted in diagram 160 versus the frequency for the exemplary standard inverted F antenna shown in
Another key parameter of an antenna is its transmission efficiency. Radiation efficiency is the ratio between the power actually radiated by the antenna versus the one injected by the transceiver through the feeding leg 155. The difference contributes to produce heat that must be dissipated by the antenna resistance. Obviously, the closer to 100% this value the better it is. This parameter is plotted in diagram 170 as a function of the radiation angle in the vertical (Z) plane, referred to as λ 172, measured in degree from the vertical axis. As expected for this type of antenna, the efficiency 174 is constant in the Z plane and is here of 55.3%.
The idea is based on the observation that in such an antenna structure (PIFA like) not all parts are actually radiating. This can be simply proved by performing a simulation of the previous antenna structure from which the grounded leg has been removed 245. The electrical parameters previously considered, namely: S11 and the transmission efficiency, are becoming as shown in 260 and 270 respectively. It should be no surprise that S11, the adaptation between antenna and transceiver impedances, be dramatically degraded versus the standard antenna of
The clear conclusion of this observation is that the ground leg of a PIFA antenna does not participate, even marginally, to the radiation of the antenna since the transmission efficiency is not impaired. Thus, it is possible to distinguish between a non radiating part, i.e., the grounded leg 245 and a radiating part comprised of the folded motifs 220 and of the feeding leg 255.
The non-radiating element or matching element 345 acts as an adaptation element for matching the impedance of the antenna to input impedance of the rest of the device.—i.e.—the electronic circuit embedded in the device. The electronic circuit typically includes components such as a radio transceiver and printed wired traces serving as electrical links. In an embodiment, the device comprises a first layer 330 where the radiating element is located and at least one layer 320 (consisting in or incorporating the ground plane). At least one of the first layer 310 and the ground plane layer 320 may be an outer layer of the multilayered wiring structure.
The results obtained are shown in diagrams 360, 370 and 375. They compare the electrical characteristics of the reference exemplary antenna of
The efficiency remains identical and found to be marginally lower at 54.3% for the new structure 375 versus the one 370 of
As far as parameter S11 is concerned, while the bandwidth at −6 dB remains identical 362, the adaptation is even better with a significantly lower value of this parameter 364, value of which is −20.4 dB while it was −12.2 dB.
Parameter S11 and the bandwidth of this antenna are shown in diagram 460. Bandwidth 464 is compared to the bandwidth 462 of the reference antenna of
It is advantageous that the adaptation element and the radiating element face each other since it optimizes the reduction of space needed for the whole antenna structure.
Even if the radiating element advantageously exhibits a folded shape, this case is not limiting the invention. However, in the case it is folded, a main direction is preserved and called longitudinal direction. In this context,
According to another embodiment, the radiating element comprises a folded wired section made of several parallels portions and the width of the portions is increasing from the feeding end 355 to the open end 334. This optimizes the efficiency of the antenna. The width increase may be continuous along the radiating element. By way of example the width of the terminal portion of the antenna may be between 1.5 and 3 times wider than the width of the first portion (the one of the feeding leg 455).
Hence, the structure of the invention allows a reduction of the area occupied by an antenna or, within the same available area, an improvement of the bandwidth and efficiency of the antenna, all other things being equal.
It should be understood that the embodiments described herein are merely exemplary and that various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10305066.2 | Jan 2010 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/050653 | 1/19/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/19/2012 |