This invention is directed to a novel antenna structure including an antenna array having a power amplifier chip operatively coupled to, and in close proximity to each antenna element in the antenna array.
In communications equipment such as cellular and personal communications service (PCS), as well as multi-channel multi-point distribution systems (MMDS) and local multi-point distribution systems (LMDS) it has been conventional to receive and retransmit signals from users or subscribers utilizing antennas mounted at the tops of towers or other structures. Other communications systems such as wireless local loop (WLL), specialized mobile radio (SMR) and wireless local area network (WLAN) have signal transmission infrastructure for receiving and transmitting communications between system users or subscribers which may also utilize various forms of antennas and transceivers.
All of these communications systems require amplification of the signals being transmitted and received by the antennas. For this purpose, it has heretofore been the practice to use a conventional linear power amplifier system, wherein the typical expense of providing the necessary amplification is typically between U.S. $100 and U.S. $300 per watt in 1998 U.S. dollars. In the case of communications systems employing towers or other structures, much of the infrastructure is often placed at the bottom of the tower or other structure with relatively long coaxial cables connecting with antenna elements mounted on the tower. The power losses experienced in the cables may necessitate some increase in the power amplification which is typically provided at the ground level infrastructure or base station, thus further increasing expense at the foregoing typical costs per unit or cost per watt.
Moreover, conventional power amplification systems of this type generally require considerable additional circuitry to achieve linearity or linear performance of the communications system. For example, in a conventional linear amplifier system, the linearity of the total system may be enhanced by adding feedback circuits and pre-distortion circuitry to compensate for the nonlinearities at the amplifier chip level, to increase the effective linearity of the amplifier system. As systems are driven to higher power levels, relatively complex circuitry must be devised and implemented to compensate for decreasing linearity as the output power increases.
Output power levels for infrastructure (base station) applications in many of the foregoing communications systems is typically in excess of ten watts, and often up to hundreds of watts which results in a relatively high effective isotropic power requirement (EIRP). For example, for a typical base station with a twenty watt power output (at ground level), the power delivered to the antenna, minus cable losses, is around ten watts. In this case, half of the power has been consumed in cable loss/heat. Such systems require complex linear amplifier components cascaded into high power circuits to achieve the required linearity at the higher output power. Typically, for such high power systems or amplifiers, additional high power combiners must be used.
All of this additional circuitry to achieve linearity of the overall system, which is required for relatively high output power systems, results in the aforementioned cost per unit/watt (between $100 and $300).
The present invention proposes distributing the power across multiple antenna (array) elements, to achieve a lower power level per antenna element and utilize power amplifier technology at a much lower cost level (per unit/per watt).
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, power amplifier chips of relatively low power and low cost per watt are utilized in a relatively low power and linear region in an infrastructure application. In order to utilize such relatively low power, low cost per watt chips, the present invention proposes use of an antenna array in which one relatively low power amplifier chip is utilized in connection with each antenna element of the array to achieve the desired overall output power of the array.
Accordingly, a relatively low power amplifier chip typically used for remote and terminal equipment (e.g., handset or user/subscriber equipment) applications may be used for infrastructure (e.g., base station) applications. In accordance with the invention, the need for distortion correction circuitry and other relatively expensive feedback circuits and the like used for linear performance in relatively high power systems is eliminated. The linear performance is achieved by using the relatively low power chips within their linear output range. That is, the invention proposes to avoid overdriving the chips or requiring operation close to saturation level, so as to avoid the requirement for additional expensive and complex circuitry to compensate for reduced linearity. The power amplifier chips used in the present invention in the linear range typically have a low output power of one watt or below. Moreover, the invention proposes installing a power amplifier chip of this type at the feed point of each element of a multi-element antenna array. Thus, the output power of the antenna system as a whole may be multiplied by the number of elements utilized in the array while maintaining linearity.
Furthermore, the present invention does not require relatively expensive high power combiners, since the signals are combined in free space (at the far field) at the remote or terminal location via electromagnetic waves. Thus, the proposed system uses low power combining avoiding otherwise conventional combining costs. Also, in tower applications, the system of the invention eliminates the power loss problems associated with the relatively long cable which conventionally connects the amplifiers in the base station equipment with the tower-mounted antenna equipment, i.e., by eliminating the usual concerns with power loss in the cable and contributing to a lesser power requirement at the antenna elements. Thus, by placing the amplifiers close to the antenna elements, amplification is accomplished after cable or other transmission line losses usually experienced in such systems. This may further decrease the need for special low loss cables, thus further reducing overall system costs.
In the drawings:
Referring now to the drawings, and initially to
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, an amplifier element 14 is operatively coupled to the feed of each antenna element 12 and is mounted in close proximity to the associated antenna element 12. In one embodiment, the amplifier elements 14 are mounted sufficiently close to each antenna element so that no appreciable losses will occur between the amplifier output and the input of the antenna element, as might be the case if the amplifiers were coupled to the antenna elements by a length of cable or the like. For example, the power amplifiers 14 may be located at the feed point of each antenna element. In one embodiment, the amplifier elements 14 comprise relatively low power, linear integrated circuit chip components, such as monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) chips. These chips may comprise chips made by the gallium arsenide (GaAs) heterojunction transistor manufacturing process. However, silicon process manufacturing or CMOS process manufacturing might also be utilized to form these chips.
Some examples of MMIC power amplifier chips are as follows:
1. RF Microdevices PCS linear power amplifier RF 2125P, RF 2125, RF 2126 or RF 2146, RF Micro Devices, Inc., 7625 Thorndike Road, Greensboro, N.C. 27409, or 7341-D W. Friendly Ave., Greensboro, N.C. 27410;
2. Pacific Monolithics PM 2112 single supply RF IC power amplifier, Pacific Monolithics, Inc., 1308 Moffett Park Drive, Sunnyvale, Calif.;
3. Siemens CGY191, CGY180 or CGY181, GaAs MMIC dual mode power amplifier, Siemens A G, 1301 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y.;
4. Stanford Microdevices SMM-208, SMM-210 or SXT-124, Stanford Microdevices, 522 Almanor Avenue, Sunnyvale, Calif.;
5. Motorola MRFIC1817 or MRFC1818, Motorola Inc., 505 Barton Springs Road, Austin, Tex.;
6. Hewlett Packard HPMX-3003, Hewlett Packard Inc., 933 East Campbell Road, Richardson, Tex.;
7. Anadigics AWT1922, Anadigics, 35 Technology Drive, Warren, N.J. 07059;
8. SEI Ltd. P0501913H, 1, Taya-cho, Sakae-ku, Yokohama, Japan; and
9. Celeritek CFK2062-P3, CCS1930 or CFK2162-P3, Celeritek, 3236 Scott Blvd., Santa Clara, Calif. 95054.
In the antenna arrays of
Referring now to
Referring to
Alternatively, the two transceivers 60, 62 may be RF-to-fiber optic transcievers (as shown for example, in
In
What has been shown and described herein is a novel antenna array employing power amplifier chips or modules at the fees of individual array antenna elements, and novel installations utilizing such an antenna system.
While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions, and are to be understood as forming a part of the invention insofar as they fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. aplication Ser. No. 09/804,178, filed Mar. 12, 2001, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,690,328, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 09/299,850, filed Apr. 26, 1999, and entitled “Antenna Structure and Installation” and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,583,763.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4124852 | Steudel | Nov 1978 | A |
4246585 | Mailloux | Jan 1981 | A |
4360813 | Fitzsimmons | Nov 1982 | A |
4566013 | Steinberg et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4607389 | Halgrimson | Aug 1986 | A |
4614947 | Rammos | Sep 1986 | A |
4689631 | Gans et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4825172 | Thompson | Apr 1989 | A |
4849763 | DuFort | Jul 1989 | A |
4890110 | Kuwahara | Dec 1989 | A |
4994813 | Shiramatsu et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5034752 | Pourailly et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038150 | Bains | Aug 1991 | A |
5061939 | Nakase | Oct 1991 | A |
5230080 | Fabre et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5247310 | Waters | Sep 1993 | A |
5248980 | Raguenet | Sep 1993 | A |
5270721 | Tsukamoto et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5280297 | Profera, Jr. | Jan 1994 | A |
5327150 | Cherrette | Jul 1994 | A |
5355143 | Zürcher et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5379455 | Koschek | Jan 1995 | A |
5412414 | Ast et al. | May 1995 | A |
5437052 | Hemmie et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5457557 | Zarem et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5513176 | Dean et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5548813 | Charas et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554865 | Larson | Sep 1996 | A |
5568160 | Collins | Oct 1996 | A |
5596329 | Searle et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5604462 | Gans et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610510 | Boone et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619210 | Dent | Apr 1997 | A |
5623269 | Hirshfield et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5644622 | Russell et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646631 | Arntz | Jul 1997 | A |
5657374 | Russell et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659322 | Caille | Aug 1997 | A |
5710804 | Bhame et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714957 | Searle et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724666 | Dent | Mar 1998 | A |
5751250 | Arntz | May 1998 | A |
5754139 | Turcotte et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758287 | Lee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5770970 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771017 | Dean et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784031 | Weiss et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5802173 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809395 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825762 | Kamin, Jr. et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832389 | Dent | Nov 1998 | A |
5854611 | Gans et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856804 | Turcotte et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862459 | Charas | Jan 1999 | A |
5878345 | Ray et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896104 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5933113 | Newberg et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936577 | Shoki et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949376 | McDonald et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966094 | Ward et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987335 | Knoedl, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008763 | Nyström et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016123 | Barton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018643 | Golemon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020848 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037903 | Lange et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043790 | Derneryd et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047199 | DeMarco | Apr 2000 | A |
6072434 | Papatheodorou | Jun 2000 | A |
6091360 | Reits | Jul 2000 | A |
6094165 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6104935 | Smith et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6140976 | Locke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144652 | Avidor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157343 | Andersson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160514 | Judd | Dec 2000 | A |
6222503 | Gietema et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233434 | Takei | May 2001 | B1 |
6233466 | Wong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240274 | Izadpanah | May 2001 | B1 |
6269255 | Waylett | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6377558 | Dent | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6690328 | Judd | Feb 2004 | B1 |
20020008577 | Cova et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 551 556 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0 447 218 | May 1996 | EP |
0 994 567 | Apr 2000 | EP |
0 713 261 | Feb 2002 | EP |
2 286 749 | Aug 1995 | GB |
2 320 618 | Jun 1998 | GB |
08-102618 | Apr 1996 | JP |
11-330838 | Nov 1999 | JP |
WO 9526116 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9534102 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9811626 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9839851 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9809372 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9909661 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9926317 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0003479 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0031824 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0106801 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 9850981 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0219470 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02039541 | May 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050099359 A1 | May 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09804178 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10757052 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09299850 | Apr 1999 | US |
Child | 09804178 | US |