Antenna system using time delays with mercury wetted switches

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6191754
  • Patent Number
    6,191,754
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 18, 1999
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 20, 2001
    24 years ago
Abstract
An electronically steerable antenna array which includes time delay units connected to individual antenna elements for time delaying a microwave signal to and/or from the antenna elements. Each time delay unit includes small mercury wetted switches for controlling signal flow via a time delay path or a bypass path, through the time delay unit from a signal input to a signal output.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the invention




The invention in general relates to antenna systems and more particularly to a wideband antenna system which generates one or more electronically steerable beams.




2. Description of related art




Various electronic systems exist which utilize an antenna, having a certain beam pattern, for the transmission and/or reception of microwave energy. For many of these systems it is a requirement that they function at relatively wideband operation. For example, in the communications art, the amount of information which can be transmitted depends upon the bandwidth of the system, with the greater the bandwidth, the greater the data rate. In the radar field, for example, improved range resolution may be achieved with wideband operation.




Many such electronic systems utilize an electronically steerable array (ESA) antenna system to augment, or eliminate the physical mechanical steering of the antenna structure. Basically, in an ESA arrangement, the antenna is comprised of a plurality of individual antenna elements and means are provided for each antenna element to alter the phase of the microwave signal going to (or coming from) the antenna element in order to steer the antenna beam in a certain off-axis direction, depending upon the phase alterations.




Typical phase altering devices include phase shifters and time delay circuits. In general, due to the requirement for constant time delay for electronic steering of the antenna beam, phase shifters do not perform well for wideband operation.




Time delay circuits can provide the necessary phase alteration across the entire face of the antenna structure to achieve desired off-axis directionality. A typical electronic time delay circuit includes a plurality of delay line stages each with a different delay time insertable into the microwave signal path. The insertion or removal of a delay segment is accomplished by miniature switches the states of which are governed by a control circuit.




For example, miniature electronic microwave switches in common use include the gallium arsenide (GaAs) field effect transistor (FET) and the GaAs pin diode. Both of these devices operate at extremely high speeds and can achieve switching rates measurable in nanoseconds.




For some applications however, the GaAs FET has objectionably high resistance when closed and high capacitance when open, resulting in a relatively low cut-off frequency, for example, 600 GHz. The pin diode exhibits a higher cut-off frequency of around 2 THz, however it, along with the GaAs FET, exhibits an objectionably high capacitance in the off state. For this reason these switches are often operated with a separate shunt inductor resonant with the capacitance, at the operating frequency.




This added inductor advantageously increases the impedance of the switch in the off condition, however this arrangement objectionably lowers the operating bandwidth of the overall switch device. In addition, the pin diode switch requires an expenditure of current to hold it in the on condition, as well as a means to inject and remove this current. This bias coupling current lowers the effective cut off frequency of the pin diode switch. For example this current may be in the order of around 1 to 10 milliamps per diode switch. There may be, however, thousands of such switches in an entire ESA system resulting in an objectionably high power consumption, measurable in kilowatts.




The antenna system of the present invention utilizing delay lines with small switches having significantly lower capacitance in the off state and lower resistance in the on state results in a system with a high cut-off frequency and true time delay across a wide band of frequencies.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The electronically steerable antenna array system of the present invention includes time delay units connected to respective ones of antenna elements. Each time delay unit has a signal input and signal output with a plurality of microstrip delay line stages connected between them. Each delay line stage, connected by an interstage connector, has a delay line segment path and a bypass segment path selectively chosen by means of predetermined control signals applied to a mercury wetted switch. These switches each include three microstrip conductors, respectively being connectable with the delay line segment, the bypass segment and the interstage connector. Each conductor includes a mercury droplet which forms electrical contact with a mercury droplet of one of the other conductors in response to the control signals.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1A and 1B

are respective side and perspective views of one embodiment of a switch utilized in the present invention, and shown in the open condition.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are respective side and perspective views of the switch, shown in the closed condition.





FIGS. 3A and 3B

functionally illustrate the switch in its respective open and closed condition.





FIG. 4A

illustrates some dimensions of the switch and

FIG. 4B

illustrates the electrical equivalent of the switch.





FIGS. 5A-5J

illustrate the fabrication of the switch.





FIGS. 6A and 6B

illustrate another embodiment of a switch which may be utilized in the present invention.





FIGS. 7A-7G

illustrate the fabrication of the embodiment of the switch shown in

FIGS. 6A and 6B

.





FIG. 8

is a block diagram of an antenna system in accordance with the present invention.





FIGS. 8A and 8B

show a plurality of antenna elements to illustrate beam direction.





FIG. 9

illustrates a time delay circuit of

FIG. 8

in more detail.





FIG. 10

illustrates, in more detail, a switch arrangement used in the time delay circuit of FIG.


9


.





FIG. 10A

illustrates another switch arrangement which may be used in the time delay circuit of FIG.


9


.





FIG. 11

illustrates a packaged time delay unit.





FIG. 12

is a partial cross-sectional view of the delay unit, along line


12





12


of FIG.


11


.





FIGS. 13A and 13B

respectively illustrate beam patterns obtained utilizing phase shifters and with time delay circuits.





FIGS. 14A

,


14


B and


14


C are frequency response curves of various switches utilizable in the time delay unit of FIG.


9


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




In the drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, like or corresponding parts are denoted by like or corresponding reference numerals.




Referring now to

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, there is illustrated switch


10


having first and second conductors


12


and


14


affixed to a substrate


16


, such as alumina. As will be described, the switch, or various embodiments, is part of a time delay circuit used in the electronically steerable antenna array of the present invention. Conductors


12


and


14


represent, by way of example, a 50 ohm characteristic impedance RF microstrip line, with a ground plane


18


positioned on the other side of substrate


16


. Chromium or titanium/gold base layers


20


and


22


may be utilized for better adhesion of the conductors


12


and


14


to the substrate


16


.




Conductors


12


and


14


are adjacent but separated from one another so that no electrical contact is made between them. A gate member


24


is disposed between the conductors


12


and


14


at the respective ends thereof, and includes a dielectric oxide coating


28


on the surface thereof. The gate member


24


is electrically conductive but has a high resistivity to prevent RF conduction and may be constituted by a polysilicon material. The oxide coating


28


may be silicon dioxide, or any other suitable coating such as silicon nitride, or silicon oxynitride, by way of example.




The switch includes respective first and second mercury droplets


30


and


32


which are elongated and electrically connected to respective conductors


12


and


14


by means of bonding layers, or pads,


34


and


36


. These bonding layers


34


and


36


are of a material, such as silver, to cause the mercury droplets to be held in place by wetting action. Other bonding materials include, for example, chromium, vanadium, niobium, molybdenum, tantalum and iridium.




During operation, the RF microstrip conductors


12


and


14


are maintained at ground potential at DC or at the low frequency associated with control voltages applied to the gate member


24


. A control electrode


40


electrically connected to gate member


24


is operable to receive a positive or negative DC control signal, relative to the mercury droplets


30


and


32


, causing them to experience a lateral field to not only wet the oxide coating


28


but to pull the mercury droplets to the top of the gate member


24


where they may be physically joined, as illustrated in

FIGS. 2A and 2B

.




As seen in

FIGS. 2A and 2B

application of the control signal to electrode


40


causes wetting of the oxide coating


28


to the extent that the mercury droplets are now joined by a mercury bridge


42


and will remained joined as long as the applied control signal is present. Upon removal of the control signal the mercury droplets


30


and


32


will revert to their respective positions illustrated in

FIGS. 1A and 1B

.





FIGS. 3A and 3B

illustrate the functional operation of the switch. In

FIG. 3A

with no control signal applied, the switch


10


is in an open condition and no RF signal passes between the conductors


12


and


14


. With the application of, for example, a positive DC control signal (+V) of a predetermined magnitude, as illustrated in

FIG. 3B

, the switch assumes a closed condition to allow propagation of the RF signal.




The predetermined magnitude of the control signal will depend upon the dimensions of the switch elements. By way of example, with reference to

FIG. 4A

, assume for the purpose of illustration that the microstrip conductors


12


and


14


have a characteristic impedance of 50 ohms with a width of 0.0254 cm (254 μm). Mercury droplets


30


and


32


each have a length (into the plane of the Fig.) equal to, or slightly less than the width of the microstrip line. Each mercury droplet has a width d


o


, where d


o


is about 20 μtm, which is approximately equal to its height as measured from the top of the droplet to the substrate


16


. The width of the gate member


24


, at its base is also assumed equal to d


o


.




With these values a gate voltage on the order of 50 volts will suffice to close the switch when the oxide coating


28


is on the order of 1000 Å thick. Further, with these dimensions, and as illustrated in

FIG. 4B

, showing the electrical equivalent of the switch, the switch will have no significant inductance, an extremely low on resistance R


ON


on the order of 20 milliohms and a low off capacitance C


OFF


on the order of 2.5×10


−14


farads. These low values delineate the operating cutoff frequency F


CO


, where:








F




CO


=1/(2


π×R




ON




×C




OFF


)  eq (1)






Substituting the R


ON


and C


OFF


values of 20 milliohms and 2.5×10


−14


farads into equation (1) yields an extremely high cutoff frequency of around 318 THz.




The structure of switch


10


lends itself to batch fabrication.

FIGS. 5A through 5J

illustrate one such process. In

FIG. 5A

the titanium and gold layer


20


has been applied to the top of substrate


16


, and ground plane


18


been applied to the bottom thereof. A separator


50


, as illustrated in

FIG. 5B

, is deposited, such as by photolithographic methods, after which the separated microstrip conductors


12


and


14


are plated, as in FIG.


5


C.




In

FIGS. 5D and 5E

another separator


52


is formed, and bonding layers


34


and


35


are evaporated on the microstrip conductors after which the bonding layers


34


and


36


are etched to the proper size and the separators are removed, as well as the titanium/gold layer underlying the separators.




In the next step, as illustrated in

FIG. 5F

, about 20 μm of high resistivity polysilicon


56


is sputtered on and a photoresist


58


is applied, as in FIG.


5


G. By a vertical reactive-ion dry-etch process the gate member


24


is formed. The photoresist


58


is removed, the gate member etched and thereafter anodized to form the oxide coating


28


, all of which is depicted in FIG.


5


.




The structure of

FIG. 5F

is dipped into a mercury bath and removed, leaving a body of mercury


60


clinging to the bonding layers


34


and


36


and over the gate member


24


. This is illustrated in FIG.


5


I. The structure with the excess mercury is spun, as indicated by arrow


62


, at about 300 rpm whereby the excess mercury is removed, leaving the well defined mercury droplets


34


and


36


as in FIG.


5


J. If desired, the excess mercury removal may also be accomplished by electric field stripping wherein an electric field between an anode and the body of mercury pulls away the excess mercury until, as the cross section approaches 1:1, the mercury becomes stiff enough to resist further removal by field stripping.




Another mercury deposition method includes vacuum evaporation of mercury onto a substrate using photoresist to aid in selective deposition of the mercury onto the bonding layer. Suitable dielectric materials may serve the role of the photoresist.





FIGS. 6A and 6B

illustrate another embodiment of a mercury wetted switch utilizable in the invention and which is simpler to fabricate and has an even lower value of off capacitance than that previously described, resulting in a higher cut off frequency. Switch


70


includes a substrate


72


, having a ground plane


74


on the bottom side thereof and a high sheet resistivity polysilicon layer


76


on the top side. A portion of this layer is given a localized lower resistivity, such as by diffusion, to form a gate member


78


.




A dielectric layer


80


, such as a oxynitride, covers polysilicon


76


, and this dielectric layer receives a titanium/gold base layer


82


to which is applied first and second microstrip conductors


84


and


86


. Also applied to the titanium/gold base layer


82


are respective bonding layers, or pads,


88


and


90


for receiving respective mercury droplets


92


and


94


.




In the absence of an applied control signal to gate member


78


, the mercury droplets


92


and


94


are as illustrated in

FIG. 6A

such that switch


70


is in an open condition with no RF conduction between conductors


84


and


86


. With the application of a suitable control signal to gate member


78


, as illustrated in

FIG. 6B

, the mercury droplets are drawn toward the gate member


78


and contact one another forming a unitary mass of mercury


96


electrically contacting both conductors


84


and


86


, thus closing the switch. When the control signal is removed, the mercury withdraws from the dielectric layer


80


and again assumes the configuration shown in FIG.


6


A.




One fabrication technique for this second switch embodiment is illustrated in

FIGS. 7A through 7G

. In

FIG. 7A

, a substrate member


72


, having a ground plane


74


, has applied to the exposed surface thereof the polysilicon layer


76


. A temporary protective oxide coating


98


is deposited on the polysilicon layer


76


by deposition or by oxidizing the surface of the polysilicon.




In

FIG. 7B

the oxide coating


98


has been opened and a diffusion or ion implantation process decreases the resistivity of the polysilicon layer in a limited area, to define the gate member


78


.




In

FIG. 7C

, the first oxide coating


98


is removed and the dielectric oxynitride layer


80


is applied, as is titanium/gold layer


82


for receiving the conductors


84


and


86


, as illustrated in FIG.


7


D. The conductors


84


and


86


may be plated on the titanium/gold layer


82


with the use of a photoresist, which has already been removed in FIG.


7


D.




In

FIG. 7E

, mercury droplet bonding pads


88


and


90


are evaporated onto the titanium/gold layer


82


and the middle section of this layer is removed leaving an exposed portion of dielectric layer


80


between the pads


88


and


90


. The structure of

FIG. 7E

is dipped into a mercury bath and removed, as illustrated in

FIG. 7F

, leaving a body of mercury


100


clinging to the bonding layers


88


and


90


as well as to the dielectric over the gate member


78


. Excess mercury may be removed by one of the aforementioned spin or field stripping processes leaving the switch structure of FIG.


7


G. Direct vacuum evaporation of mercury onto the pads may also be accomplished.




Although not illustrated, after fabrication the switch or switches may be placed in a hermetically sealed container filled with an inert gas, such as argon, prior to use. This container can either be external, or an integrally constructed configuration relative to the switch. The mercury wetted switch is utilized in the delay selection paths of time delay circuits of an ESA system, a sample one of which is illustrated in FIG.


8


.





FIG. 8

is a simplified representation of the transmitter function of a radar system having a plurality of antenna elements


104


A,


104


B . . .


104




n


. A transmitter


106


provides a microwave signal to be transmitted, to a manifold circuit


108


which distributes the signal to the plurality of antenna elements. A transmitter beam, or a plurality of such beams may be formed and steered, with the provision of a delay circuit


110


comprised of a plurality of time delay units


112


A,


112


B, . . .


112




n


, and all being governed by a control means


113


. In a similar manner, receiver beams may be formed and steered utilizing similar delay units.





FIG. 8A

illustrates the plurality of antenna elements


104


A to


104




n


in relation to a uniphase front


114


of an incoming signal. The antenna elements, which may typically be dipoles, slots, open ended waveguides or printed circuit patches, by way of example, are each connected to a respective time delay unit, as illustrated in FIG.


8


. For simplicity, a line array is illustrated, although the principles are equally applicable to a two dimensional array.




In

FIG. 8A

it is seen that the phase front will impinge upon all of the antenna elements


104


A to


104




n


at the same time and a receiver beam will be formed perpendicular to the array along an antenna axis, or boresite, B (for simplicity, time delay, amplifier and beamformer circuits are not illustrated). In such instance the delays provided by all of the time delay units connected to the respective antenna elements are equal.




If various delays are applied to the antenna element signals a beam may be processed which is pointed in another direction. For example, in

FIG. 8B

a uniphase front


116


is illustrated as initially exciting end antenna element


104




n


while it is still at a distance δ from end element


104


A. By applying a time delay to the signal from antenna element


104




n


equivalent to the time for the phase front


116


to reach antenna element


104


A, and applying respective smaller delays to the signals from the intermediate antenna elements, a beam may be formed which points at an off-axis angle θ along line B′ relative to boresite B. Depending upon the angle θ, δ may be many wavelengths.




The principles applicable to the receive case of

FIGS. 8A and 8B

are equally applicable to the transmit mode of operation by delaying the microwave signals which are applied to the antenna elements. In addition, by providing multiple time delays for each antenna element, or groups of elements, multiple simultaneous beams may be formed.




A typical time delay unit


112


is illustrated in more detail in FIG.


9


. The time delay unit


112


includes nine stages of delay,


121


-


129


which, when selectively placed into the signal path, can control the relative time delay of a signal applied to input terminal


130


, from 0 ns to 2.044 ns in 4 ps increments, until the signal appears at output terminal


132


.




From

FIG. 9

it is seen that stage


121


is capable of a 1024 ps delay, with delays of 512 ps, 256 ps, 128 ps, 64 ps, 32 ps, 16 ps, 8 ps, and 4 ps being provided by respective stages


122


-


129


. The selection of the particular stages to be in the signal path is governed by inclusion of single pole, double throw mercury wetted switch arrangements utilizing the principles described herein, and identified by reference characters


133


in

FIG. 9

, the on and off conditions of which are governed by signals provided by control circuit


134


, in response to command signals from control means


113


(FIG.


8


).




Each of the delay line stages


121


-


129


includes a delay segment


135


, a bypass segment


136


and an interstage connector


137


.




A typical switch arrangement


133


is illustrated in more detail in FIG.


10


. The arrangement includes three microstrip conductors one of which,


140


is electrically connectable with an interstage connector


137


, another of which,


141


, is electrically connectable with a delay segment


135


and another of which,


142


, is electrically connectable with bypass segment


136


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 10

conductors


140


,


141


and


142


are integral with respective lines


137


,


135


and


136


.




Routing of the signal on interstage connector


140


to either conductor


141


or


142


is accomplished by the provision of respective mercury switches


146


and


147


, each having a construction as previously described.




That is, switch


146


includes a gate member


150


having a gate electrode


152


to which is applied a control signal for governing movement of mercury droplets


154


and


156


for closing switch


146


, whereby conductor


141


and the particular delay segment is selected for the signal path.




In a similar fashion, switch


147


includes a gate member


160


having a gate electrode


162


to which is applied a control signal for governing movement of the mercury droplets


164


and


166


for closing switch


147


, whereby conductor


142


and the particular bypass segment is selected for the signal path.





FIG. 10A

illustrates another switch arrangement


133


which accomplishes the same function as that shown in

FIG. 10

, however with one less mercury droplet. More particularly, the switch arrangement of

FIG. 10A

includes mercury droplets


174


,


175


and


176


, with droplets


174


and


175


having common gate member


150


, and with droplets


175


and


176


having common gate member


160


. Application of a control signal to gate electrode


152


will select the delay segment path


141


/


135


while a control signal applied to gate electrode


162


will select the bypass path


142


/


136


.




An important aspect of the antenna system of the present invention is a means to assure that individual time delay and bypass lines do not couple to adjacent lines so as to degrade the accurate time delay provided by time delay unit


112


(FIG.


9


). To this end reference is made to

FIG. 11

which illustrates a time delay unit


112


enclosed in a package


178


along with control circuit


134


. Owing to the small sized switches utilized and the time delay unit design, the components may be contained in a package which is less than λ×λ where λ is the wavelength of the highest frequency of interest. For the embodiment of

FIG. 11

, with an upper frequency of 10 GHz, the package may be around 0.6λ×0.6λ, where λ is the wavelength of the highest frequency of interest.




With additional reference to

FIG. 12

, which is a partial cross-section along line


12





12


of

FIG. 11

, it is see n that package


178


includes respective electrically grounding top and bottom cover members


180


and


181


electrically connected together by means of electrically conductive vias, or posts,


184


spaced apart preferably less than every {fraction (1/10)}λ.




Adjacent lines of the delay segment


135


are illustrated as being encased in a dielectric medium such as alumina


186


such that each microstrip line is enclosed in its own shielded cage, thus permitting long closely packed time delay lines without cross couplin g effects that can lead to multiple reflections and noise.




The package


178


can be fabricated in two halves, a top half and a bottom half and then joined together. In order to accommodate for slight misalignments of the top and bottom vias


184


, one of the vias made be of a larger diameter than the other, as illustrated in

FIG. 12

wherein the bottom portion of the via


184


is larger than the top portion.





FIGS. 13A and 13B

are idealized computer generated beam patterns illustrating the advantages of using time delay circuits in lieu of phase shifters. As was stated, phase shifters are good for single frequency use and do not perform well for wideband operation. To demonstrate this, reference is made to

FIG. 13A

, wherein beam angle, in degrees, is plotted on the horizontal axis and normalized beam intensity is plotted on the vertical axis.




In

FIG. 13A

, utilizing typical phase shifters; a beam is steered to a nominal beam angle of 30°. The beam responses for operating frequencies of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 GHz are illustrated. It is seen that with the phase shifters there is an objectionable change in beam position with change in frequency.




In contrast, and as illustrated in

FIG. 13B

, with time delay units in place of phase shifters, there is excellent preservation of beam shape, all centered about the 30° scan angle, across the same frequency range 6 to 10 GHz, as depicted in FIG.


13


A.




The time delay units with the present invention, utilizing the mercury wetted switches described herein, offer true time delay and superior operating characteristics than comparable pin or GaAs switches typically used in time delay units.




For example,

FIGS. 14A

,


14


B and


14


C illustrate a computer generated broadband response of three types of switches used in the time delay unit of FIG.


9


. In the simulation all 18 switches are activated to route an input microwave signal through all of the delay segments, for a maximum delay of 2.044 ns.





FIG. 14A

illustrates the response of the mercury wetted switch described herein, in FIG.


10


. As seen in

FIG. 14A

, the extremely low C


off


and R


on


of the mercury wetted switch results in a response with very low ripple, less than approximately 2 ps, over a very broadband approaching 1 to 11 GHz. Essentially, the time delay remains true over this band of operation, resulting in a precise beam integrity required for advanced broadband systems.





FIG. 14B

illustrates the response for a pin diode switch and

FIG. 14C

illustrates the response for a GaAs switch. It may be seen that these switches, under the same measurement conditions as in

FIG. 14A

, generate ripple (approximately 200 ps and 1500 ps respectively) which is much too large, and would result in a degradation of beam integrity.




Although the present invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is to be understood that various substitutions and modifications may be made, including those illustrated in the aforementioned application, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. An electronically steerable antenna array system, comprising:(A) a plurality of antenna elements; (B) a plurality of time delay units connected in signal transfer relationship with a selected one of said antenna elements; (C) each said time delay unit including a signal input and signal output and a plurality of microstrip delay line stages each stage having a delay line segment and bypass segment selectively insertable in circuit between said input and said output; (D) said delay line stages being electrically connected in series by respective interstage connectors; (E) a plurality of mercury wetted switches connected to said delay line stages and operable upon application of predetermined control signals to selectively insert predetermined ones of said delay line segments into said circuit; (F) each said mercury wetted switch including three microstrip conductors, one of said conductors being electrically connectable with a said delay line segment, another of said conductors being electrically connectable with a said bypass segment and another of said conductors being electrically connectable with a said interstage connector; (G) each said conductor including a mercury droplet which forms electrical contact with a mercury droplet of one of said other conductors upon the application of said predetermined control signals.
  • 2. A system according to claim 1 wherein:(A) respective ones of said microstrip conductors of said mercury wetted switch are respectively integral with said delay line segment, said bypass segment and said interstage connector.
  • 3. A system according to claim 1 wherein:(A) said delay line stages are of progressively smaller delay times.
  • 4. A system according to claim 3 wherein:(A) said time delay unit including at least nine said delay line stages providing a delay from a minimum delay to a maximum delay of 2.044 ns, in 4 ps increments.
  • 5. A system according to claim 1 wherein:(A) each said mercury wetted switch includes four mercury droplets for connecting an interstage connector with a selected one of said delay line segment and bypass segment.
  • 6. A system according to claim 1 wherein:(A) each said mercury wetted switch includes three mercury droplets for connecting an interstage connector with a selected one of said delay line segment or bypass segment.
  • 7. A system according to claim 1 wherein:(A) each said mercury wetted switch has an on resistance Ron which is on the order of 20 milliohms.
  • 8. A system according to claim 1 wherein:(A) each said mercury wetted switch has an off capacitance Coff which is on the order of 2.5×10−14 farads.
  • 9. A system according to claim 1 wherein:(A) each said time delay unit is encased in a package having electrically conducting and electrically joined top and bottom cover members.
  • 10. A system according to claim 9 wherein:(A) said top and bottom cover members are electrically joined by a plurality of electrically conducting posts positioned adjacent said delay line segments, bypass segments and interstage connectors.
  • 11. A system according to claim 10 wherein:(A) said posts are spaced at a distance of at less than {fraction (1/10)}λ from one another, where λ is the wavelength of the highest frequency of interest.
  • 12. A system according to claim 9 wherein:(A) said package has a measurement of less than λ, where λ is the wavelength of the highest frequency of interest.
  • 13. A system according to claim 12 wherein:(A) said package is rectangular and has a measurement of around 0.6λ×0.6λ.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/135,747 filed Aug. 18, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,912,606.

US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
3855613 Napoli et al. Dec 1974
5381150 Hawkins et al. Jan 1995
5912606 Nathanson et al. Jun 1999
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/135747 Aug 1998 US
Child 09/271833 US