The present invention generally pertains to orthopedic surgical procedures. More particularly, the present invention pertains to anterior spinal implants.
The human spinal column includes more than twenty discrete bones. These bones are generally similar in shape. Despite their similar shape, however, they do vary substantially in size in accordance with their individual position along the spinal column. The bones are anatomically categorized as being members of one of three classifications: cervical, thoracic, or lumbar. The cervical portion of the spinal column, which comprises the top of the spine up to the base of the skull, includes the first seven vertebrae. The intermediate twelve bones are thoracic vertebrae. The remaining five bones are the lumbar vertebrae.
The anterior portion of the spine includes a set of generally cylindrically shaped bones stacked one on top of the other which are referred to as the vertebral bodies. The vertebral bodies are separated from one another by cartilage spacers referred to as intervertebral discs. The intervertebral discs normally maintain a disc height between adjacent vertebral bodies.
The spinal column is a highly complex structure which houses and protects critical elements of the nervous system. In spite of these complexities, the spinal column is a highly flexible structure, capable of a high degree of curvature and twist through a wide range motion. Genetic or developmental irregularities, trauma, chronic stress, tumors, and disease, however, can result in spinal pathologies which either limit this range of motion, or threaten the critical elements of the nervous system housed within the spinal column.
In various orthopedic surgical procedures, it is necessary to stabilize portions of a spinal column relative to one another. This need is typically a result of disease, damage or congenital deformation. For example, when one or more intervertebral disks of the spine degenerate due to trauma or disease, the spinal cord or emergent nerve can become compressed. This condition results in chronic and sometimes debilitating, neck, back, or peripheral pain.
One method of treatment for intervertebral disk degeneration involves surgical decompression of nerves, reestablishment of the normal gap between adjacent vertebral bodies, and maintenance of the normal gap with an implant secured to the spinal column. For example, posterior implants are attached to the back of the spinal column generally by coupling to the pedicles with screws, or through hooks which attach under the lamina. The implants generally include elongate support rod elements which are coupled to the screws or hooks to immobilize several sequential vertebrae, for example to hold them stable so that adjacent vertebral bodies may be fused with bone graft.
Another method for treatment of intervertebral disk degeneration, the normal gap between adjacent vertebral bodies is surgically re-established and maintained with a rigid spacer inserted between the bodies. The rigid spacer is filled with bone graft material to facilitate bony fusion of the two vertebral bodies. A successful fusion stabilizes the spine, reduces pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots, and reduces or eliminates back pain.
Yet another method for treatment of intervertebral disk degeneration involves discectomy and introduction of an implant between two adjacent vertebral bodies. Such intervertebral implants re-establish the normal gap between adjacent vertebral bodies. In some known applications, the use of intervertebral implants maintains a degree of the natural movement permitted between adjacent vertebral bodies.
One method of treatment for intervertebral disk degeneration involves surgical decompression of nerves, reestablishment of the normal gap between adjacent vertebral bodies, and maintenance of the normal gap with an implant secured to the spinal column. For example, posterior implants are attached to the back of the spinal column generally by coupling to the pedicles with screws, or through hooks which attach under the lamina. The implants generally include elongate support rod elements which are coupled to the screws or hooks to immobilize several sequential vertebrae, for example to hold them stable so that adjacent vertebral bodies may be fused with bone graft.
While known devices for spinal stabilization have proven to be effective in various applications, they nevertheless can be the subject of certain improvements. In this regard, many known devices for spinal stabilization are associated with areas of localized stress on adjacent vertebral end plates and/or migration and retropulsion from proper positioning within the spinal column. There remains a need in the pertinent art to overcome these and other limitations associated with known devices.
It is a general object of the present invention to provide an anterior spinal implant that resists migration and retropulsion from proper positioning within the spinal column.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an anterior spinal implant that provides increased contact area with adjacent vertebral end plates.
It is a related object of the present invention to provide an anterior spinal implant that disperses stresses over a larger area on adjacent vertebral end plates.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an anterior spinal implant that re-establishes the disk height and allows for articulation against the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies.
Further objects of the present invention include provision for an anterior spinal implant that provides less subsidence, improved cartilage survival, improved motion in the associate spinal segment and improved spinal stability.
Additional objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In one particular form, the present invention provides an anterior spinal implant including a superior end face, an inferior end face and a generally cylindrical sidewall. The generally cylindrical sidewall extends between the superior end face and the inferior end face. The superior end face and the inferior end face are convex.
In another form, the present invention provides an anterior spinal implant having a convexly shaped superior end face and a convexly shaped inferior end face. The anterior spinal implant additionally includes a sidewall extending between the superior end face and the inferior end face. The sidewall includes a convexly curved leading portion, a convexly curved trailing portion and a pair of substantially planar side portions.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
With initial reference to the simplified environmental view of
The anterior spinal implant is intended to abut the end plates 14 of the adjacent vertebral bodies 10. The remaining embodiments of the present invention are intended to be similarly situated within the human spine 12. One particular method of implantation will be described below.
With continued reference to
The implant 100 has a diameter D and a constant height H. In certain preferred applications for the lumbar portion of the human spine, the diameter D ranges from approximately 16.5 mm to approximately 25 mm. In these applications, the height H ranges from approximately 8 mm to 20 mm. It will be understood that dimensions and relative dimensions of these preferred applications and any preferred applications discussed below in connection with other embodiments of the present invention are merely exemplary. In this regard, the teachings of the present invention apply to a much wider range of dimensions depend upon anatomical considerations and surgeon preferences.
As shown most particularly in
With reference to
In the embodiment illustrated, the cephalad and caudad radii of the superior and inferior end faces 202 and 204 are partially spherical (shown most clearly in
Turning to
In the embodiment illustrated, the superior face 302 and the inferior face 304 are convex. In contrast to the first and second embodiments, the superior and inferior end faces 302 and 304 of the implant 300 include distinct sagittal and coronal radii. In one exemplary application, the sagittal radii of curvature (shown most clearly in
The anterior spinal implant 300 further differs from the anterior spinal implants 100 and 200 in that the sidewall 306 has a variable height. As shown in
With reference to
The anterior spinal implant 400 of the fourth preferred embodiment is similar to the implant 300 of the third preferred embodiment in that the superior and inferior end faces 402 and 404 of the implant 400 are distinct. The anterior spinal implant 400 differs from the implant 300 in that the apexes of the sagittal radii of the superior and inferior faces 402 and 404 are offset toward a posterior end of the implant 400. This offset is shown most clearly in
The anterior spinal implant 400 includes a maximum height Hmax from the apex of the sagittal radius of the superior end face 402 to the apex of the sagittal radius of the inferior end face 404. The maximum height Hmax ranges from approximately 8 mm to approximately 20 mm. Where the maximum height Hmax is approximately 8 mm, the sagittal radii of the superior and inferior faces 102 and 104 is approximately 90 mm. Where the maximum height Hmax is approximately 20 mm, the sagittal radii of the superior and inferior faces 402 and 404 is approximately 25 mm. The remaining dimensions of the implant 400 are similar to corresponding dimensions of the previously described embodiments.
With reference to
In preferred applications, the sagittal radius of curvature of the superior face 502 adjacent the anterior end 510 is approximately 30 mm and the radius of curvature of the superior face 502 adjacent the posterior end 512 is approximately 10 mm to approximately 14 mm. In these particular applications, the radius of curvature of the inferior face 504 adjacent the anterior end 510 is approximately 30 mm and the radius of curvature of the inferior face 504 adjacent the posterior end 512 ranges from approximately 11 mm to approximately 13 mm.
The apexes of the sagittal radii of the superior and inferior faces 502 and 504 are preferably offset. As shown most clearly in
The radii of curvature of both the superior and inferior faces 502 and 504 in a coronal direction is variable from the anterior end 510 to the posterior end 512 of the implant. In the embodiment illustrated, the coronal radii of the superior face 502 and inferior face 504 through any particular cross section are substantially identical. In certain preferred applications, the coronal radii of curvature through the apexes of the superior face 502 and inferior face 504 ranges from approximately 17 mm to approximately 11.5 mm. Where the maximum height Hmax is approximately 8 mm, the coronal radii of curvature are approximately 17 mm. Where the maximum height is approximately 16 mm, the coronal radii of curvature are approximately 11.5 mm.
Distinct from the prior described embodiments, the sidewall 506 of the implant 500 is not continuously curved. As perhaps shown most clearly in the superior view of
The implant 500 preferably has a width W between the lateral sides 518 of approximately 17 mm. The implant 500 additionally includes a length L between the posterior side 514 and the anterior side 516 which ranges between approximately 18 mm and 22 mm. The anterior spinal implant 500 includes a maximum height Hmax from the apex of the superior end face 502 to the apex of the inferior end face 504. The maximum height Hmax ranges from approximately 8 mm to approximately 16 mm.
The implant 500 of the fifth preferred embodiment of the present invention further differs from the prior described embodiments in that the sidewall 506 is formed to include a groove 520 that extends completely around the perimeter. The groove is intended to engage an implantation tool 600 in a manner to be described below. It will be understood that the other embodiments of the present invention may be similarly formed to include a groove for cooperation with an implantation tool.
With particular reference to
The jaw 608 of the engagement member includes a pair of spaced apart prongs 614 that define an opening for receiving the spinal implant 500. Preferably, the opening defined by the prongs is slightly smaller than the width of the spinal implant 500. In this manner, insertion of the spinal implant 500 into the opening functions to elastically deform the prongs 600. The resilient nature of the plastic retains the spinal implant 500 within the opening. In the preferred embodiment, the jaw 608 is formed to include a rail 618 that engages three sides of the spinal implant 500. Specifically, the rail 618 engages the groove 520 on the spinal implant 500 to maintain the orientation of the spinal implant relative to the jaw 608.
Depending on surgeon's preference, the anterior spinal implants of the present invention may be inserted from an anterior approach or a posterior approach. If the implant 500 is to be surgically implanted anteriorly, the implant 500 is positioned within the jaw 608 such that the posterior end 512 is the leading end. Conversely, if the implant 500 is to be surgically implanted posteriorly, the anterior end 510 of the spinal implant 500 will be the leading end. The posterior offset of the apexes of the superior and inferior end faces 502 and 504 allow the implant to be seated in the nuclear recesses of the end plates 14. In this manner, the fulcrum of the nuclear recess is restored and the natural function of the spine is substantially returned. The end plates 14 may articulate in a natural manner relative to the smooth end faces 502 and 504 of the implant 500.
Upon proper positioning of the implant 500, retraction of the spine 12 is released. The release causes the end plates 14 of the spine 12 to at least partially load the spinal implant 500. The load on the implant 500 is to a sufficient degree such that withdrawal of the insertion tool 600 causes the prong 614 to resiliently expand, thereby leaving the spinal implant 500 between the vertebral bodies 10.
Upon implantation, the various embodiments of the present invention resist migration and retropulsion from their proper positioning within the spinal column. The various embodiments also provide an increase contact area with the adjacent end plates and disperse stresses over a larger area on the end plates. The implants additionally provide less subsidence, improve cartilage survival, improve motion in the associated spinal segment and improve spinal stability.
The anterior spinal implants 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 of the preferred embodiments present invention may be constructed of any material having suitable biocompatibility and strength characteristics. Suitable materials include, but are not limited to, cobalt chromium alloy and pyrolytic carbon. The various embodiments of the present invention may also be constructed of allograft bone.
The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims priority to a provisional patent application which has been assigned U.S. Ser. No. 60/355,418, filed Feb. 7, 2002.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/03743 | 2/7/2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60355418 | Feb 2002 | US |