ANTI-CANCER AND ANTI-PROLIFERATIVE COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS FOR THEIR USE IN TREATING CANCER

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20220233624
  • Publication Number
    20220233624
  • Date Filed
    March 04, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Published
    July 28, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
The present invention is directed to methods of treating cancer and inhibiting proliferation of cancer cells with compositions comprising extracts prepared from Terminalia chebula fruits (for instance AyuFlex®), Terminalia bellerica fruits (for instance Ayuric®), Phyllanthus emblica fruits (for instance Capros®), Withania somnifera roots and leaves (for instance Sensoril®), Shilajit (for instance PrimaVie®), Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs (for instance PhytoBGS®), and/or combinations thereof, including a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica (e.g. Crominex-3+®). Combinations of the extracts with anti-cancer drugs, and related methods, are also described.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from Indian Provisional Application No. 202041009290 (IN), filed Mar. 4, 2020, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to compositions and methods for treating cancer and/or inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells and/or cancer-associated cells with compositions comprising Terminalia chebula (e.g. AyuFlex®), Terminalia bellerica (e.g. Ayuric®), Phyllanthus emblica (e.g. Capros®), Withania somnifera (e.g. Sensoril®), Shilajit (e.g. PrimaVie®), Azadirachta indica (e.g. PhytoBGS®), and combinations thereof, including for instance a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica (e.g. Crominex-3+®). Combinations of the extracts, co-administration with anti-cancer drugs, and related methods are also described.


BACKGROUND


Terminalia chebula has been extensively used in Ayurveda, Unani and Homoeopathic systems of medicine for improvement of different health conditions. T. chebula may be rich in tannoids and may contain a variety of other constituents. Chemical constituents isolated from T. chebula may vary considerably in type and/or concentration due to number of factors, e.g., ecological variation, soil variation, nutrient variation, as well as variations in the process of extraction.



Terminalia bellerica (a.k.a. belerica, belirica, bellirica) is grown widely throughout India, Sri Lanka, and South East Asia. T. bellerica has been used for centuries in Ayurveda and may contain several chemical constituents in common with T. chebula.



Phyllanthus emblica, the Indian gooseberry, is also widely used in Indian medicine for treatment of various diseases.



Withania somnifera, commonly known as Ashwagandha, has been used in herbal formulations of the Ayurvedic or Indian system of medicine, for instance to help to ward off stress and act as an adaptogen.


Shilajit, also known as “Moomiyo,” is found in high altitudes, for instance of the Himalayan Mountains, and is considered one of the “wonder medicines” of Ayurveda, the traditional Indian system of medicine dating back to 3500 B.C.E. Shilajit is physiologically active organic matter, composed of rock humus, rock minerals, and organic substances that have been compressed by layers of rock mixed with marine organisms and microbial metabolites. Shilajit oozes out of the rocks as a black mass in the Himalayas at higher altitudes ranging from 1000 to 5000 meters, as the rocks become warm during summer. Shilajit contains fulvic acids (“FAs”) as its main components, along with dibenzo-α-pyrones (“DBPs”) and DBP chromoproteins, humic acid, and more than forty (40) minerals. DBPs are also known as Urolithins (e.g. Urolithin A, Urolithin B).



Azadirachta indica, commonly known as neem, nitree, or Indian lilac, is a tree in the mahogany family Meliaceae. It is one of two species in the genus Azadirachta, and is native to the Indian subcontinent, i.e., India, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Maldives. It is typically grown in tropical and semi-tropical regions. Neem trees also grow in islands located in the southern part of Iran. Its fruits and seeds are the source of neem oil.


Products made from neem trees have been used in India for over two millennia for their medicinal properties. Neem products are considered a major component in Siddha medicine and Ayurvedic and Unani medicine and are particularly prescribed for skin diseases. Neem oil is also used to promote healthy hair, to improve liver function, detoxify the blood, and balance blood sugar levels. Neem leaves have also been used to treat skin diseases like eczema and psoriasis.


Primary patient-derived cancer cells (PDCs), cultured directly from tissue obtained from surgery in cancer patients, provide a physiologically relevant platform for testing an individual's cancer cells and cell type responses to a specific drug or composition. Information derived from PDC testing may be useful in personalized as well as generalized cancer patient treatments.


In addition, in-vitro studies using standardized cancer cell lines provide valuable information for animal and human treatments.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells and/or cancer-associated cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising Terminalia chebula (for instance, AyuFlex®), Terminalia bellerica (for instance, Ayuric®), Phyllanthus emblica (for instance, Capros®), Withania somnifera (for instance, Sensoril®), Shilajit (for instance, PrimaVie®), and/or Azadirachta indica (for instance, PhytoBGS®), and combinations thereof, including for instance a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica (e.g. Crominex-3+®), and applying the composition to cancer cells in an amount effective to cause an anti-proliferative effect. In an embodiment, cancer cells inhibited according to the present invention include glioma cells, breast cancer cells (ER/PR+ Her2 equivocal (“HR+”), ER/PR− Her2+(“Her2+”), and Triple Negative (“TN”)), chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells (“CLL”), acute myeloid leukemia cells (“AML”), small cell lung cancer cells, non-small lung cancer cells, colon cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, and/or ovarian cancer cells.


Also, the present invention is directed to a method of treating cancer in a subject in need of such treatment, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising Terminalia chebula (for instance, AyuFlex®), Terminalia bellerica (for instance, Ayuric®), Phyllanthus emblica (for instance, Capros®), Withania somnifera (for instance, Sensoril®), Shilajit (for instance, PrimaVie®), and/or Azadirachta indica (for instance, PhytoBGS®), and combinations thereof, including for instance a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica (e.g. Crominex-3+®), and administering the composition to the subject in an amount effective to treat the cancer, for instance by slowing the progression or growth of the cancer, stopping the progression or growth of the cancer, shrinking the cancerous tumor, reducing the number of cancer cells and/or cancer-associated cells in the subject, and/or rendering the cancer almost undetectable or undetectable in the subject. In an embodiment, a cancer treated according to the present application includes glioma, breast cancer (including ER/PR+ Her2 equivocal, ER/PR− Her2+, and Triple Negative), chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, colon cancer, small-cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and/or ovarian cancer. In an embodiment, the composition is an extract, for instance a standardized aqueous extract, of the plants identified above. In an embodiment, a method of treatment according to this invention includes administering compositions such as extracts of the above with anti-cancer drugs to enhance the effects of the drugs and, in an embodiment, reduce side, adverse, or toxic effects of the drugs, in an embodiment by reducing the necessary dose of the traditional drug.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of AyuFlex® on cancer PDCs (left to right: Glioma, Breast Cancer (HR+), Breast Cancer (Her2+), Breast Cancer (TN), CLL, AML) in an anti-proliferation assay (“% INHIBITION” marked at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100%, with extract concentrations shown in 3 concentrations for each cancer type, left to right: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml).



FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of Ayuric® on cancer PDCs (left to right: Glioma, Breast Cancer (HR+), Breast Cancer (Her2+), Breast Cancer (TN), CLL, AML) in an anti-proliferation assay (“% INHIBITION” marked at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100%, with extract concentrations shown in 3 concentrations for each cancer type, left to right: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml).



FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of Capros® on cancer PDCs (left to right: Glioma, Breast Cancer (HR+), Breast Cancer (Her2+), Breast Cancer (TN), CLL, AML) in an anti-proliferation assay (“% INHIBITION” marked at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100%, with extract concentrations shown in 3 concentrations for each cancer type, left to right: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml).



FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of Sensoril® on cancer PDCs (left to right: Glioma, Breast Cancer (HR+), Breast Cancer (Her2+), Breast Cancer (TN), CLL, AML) in an anti-proliferation assay (“% INHIBITION” marked at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100%, with extract concentrations shown in 3 concentrations for each cancer type, left to right: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml).



FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of PrimaVie® Shilajit on cancer PDCs (left to right: Glioma, Breast Cancer (HR+), Breast Cancer (Her2+), Breast Cancer (TN), CLL, AML) in an anti-proliferation assay (“% INHIBITION” marked at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100%, with extract concentrations shown in 3 concentrations for each cancer type, left to right: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml).



FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of PhytoBGS® on cancer PDCs in an anti-proliferation assay (“% INHIBITION” marked at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100%, with extract concentrations shown in 3 concentrations for each cancer type, left to right: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml).



FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and PhytoBGS® on glioma PDCs in an anti-proliferation assay.



FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® on glioma cancer cells in an anti-proliferation assay, alone or in combination with temozolomide, or in the combinations Ayuflex®+Capros®, Ayuflex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®.



FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and PhytoBGS® on breast cancer “HR+” PDCs in an anti-proliferation assay.



FIG. 10 is a graph representing a dose-response curve of Ayuflex® on HR+ breast cancer cells.



FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® on HR+ breast cancer cells in an anti-proliferation assay, each in combination with docetaxel or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or in the combinations Ayuflex®+Capros®, Ayuflex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®.



FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® on HR+ breast cancer cells in an anti-proliferation assay, alone or in combination with docetaxel or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or in the combinations Ayuflex®+Capros®, Ayuflex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®, grouped by extract according to the invention.



FIG. 13 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and PhytoBGS® on breast cancer “Her2+” PDCs in an anti-proliferation assay.



FIG. 14 is a graph representing a dose-response curve of Ayuflex® on Her2+ breast cancer cells.



FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® on Her2+ breast cancer cells in an anti-proliferation assay, each in combination with docetaxel or 5-fluorouracil, or in the combinations Ayuflex®+Capros®, Ayuflex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®.



FIG. 16 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and PhytoBGS® on breast cancer “TN” (Triple Negative) PDCs in an anti-proliferation assay.



FIG. 17 is a graph representing a dose-response curve of Ayuflex® on TN breast cancer cells.



FIG. 18 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® on TN breast cancer cells in an anti-proliferation assay, each in combination with docetaxel or 5-fluorouracil, or in the combinations Ayuflex®+Capros®, Ayuflex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®.



FIG. 19 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and PhytoBGS® on CLL (Chronic lymphocytic leukemia) PDCs in an anti-proliferation assay.



FIG. 20 is a graph representing a dose-response curve of Ayuflex®, Capros®, Ayuric®, and the drug ibrutinib on CLL cancer cells.



FIG. 21 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® on CLL cancer cells in an anti-proliferation assay, alone or in combination with ibrutinib, or in the combinations Ayuflex®+Capros®, Ayuflex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®.



FIG. 22 is a graph illustrating anti-proliferative and anti-cancer effects of AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and PhytoBGS® on AML (Acute myeloid leukemia) PDCs in an anti-proliferation assay.



FIG. 23 is a graph representing a dose-response curve of PhytoBGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril® on AML cancer cells.



FIG. 24 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Phyto-BGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril® on AML cancer cells in an anti-proliferation assay, alone or in combination with arsenic trioxide, cytarabine, or doxorubicin, or in the combinations PhytoBGS®+PrimaVie®, PhytoBGS®+Sensoril®, and PrimaVie®+Sensoril®.



FIG. 25 is a graph representing a dose-response curve of Sensoril® on AML subtype Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL, APML) patient-derived cancer cells (PDCs), showing a 50% Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) of 32.94 ug/ml.



FIG. 26 is a graph showing the inhibition of APL PDC proliferation with Sensoril® and cytarabine.



FIG. 27 is a graph showing the inhibition of APL PDC proliferation with Sensoril® alone and synergistically with Sensoril® and arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in combination.



FIG. 28 is a graph showing the inhibition of APL PDC proliferation with Sensoril® alone and synergistically with Sensoril® and doxorubicin in combination.



FIG. 29 is a graph showing the inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation with extracts of this invention.



FIG. 30 is a graph showing the inhibition of colon cancer cell proliferation with extracts of this invention.



FIG. 31 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® on glioma PDCs SB 32833 (Glioblastoma Grade IV) in an anti-proliferation assay, alone or in the combinations Ayuflex®+Capros®, Ayuflex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®, with GDC-0941 (10 uM), Doxorubicin (10 uM), and Temozolomide (100 uM) as controls.



FIG. 32 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® on glioma SB 6129 (anaplastic astrocytoma Grade III) patient-derived cancer cells in an anti-proliferation assay, alone (left to right: AyuFlex, Capros, Ayuric, or in combination Ayuflex®+Capros®, Ayuflex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®, with GDC-0941 (10 uM), Doxorubicin (10 uM), and Temozolomide (100 uM) as controls.



FIG. 33 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of extracts of this invention in inhibiting proliferation of glioblastoma cells (U87-MG cell line).



FIG. 34 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of extracts of this invention in inhibiting proliferation of glioblastoma cells (U87-MG cell line).



FIG. 35 illustrates dose-response curves of inhibitory activity of Sensoril® (IC50 67 ug/ml), cytarabine (IC50 567 nM), As2O3 (IC50 2.3 uM), and doxorubicin (IC50 79 nM) on AML cells (HL60 cell line).



FIG. 36 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of extracts of this invention in inhibiting Triple Negative Breast Cancer cell proliferation (SB 30750 PDCs) after a 72-hour incubation period.



FIG. 37 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of extracts of this invention in inhibiting Triple Negative Breast Cancer cell proliferation (MDAMB-231 cell line) after a 72-hour incubation period.



FIG. 38 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of extracts of this invention in inhibiting Triple Negative Breast Cancer cell proliferation (MDAMB-231 cell line) after a 120-hour incubation period.



FIG. 39 is a graph comparing the efficacy of extracts of this invention in inhibiting MDAMB-231 Triple Negative Breast Cancer cell proliferation (MDAMB-231 cell line) after 72- and 120-hour incubation periods.



FIG. 40 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, and other extracts of this invention in inhibiting proliferation of small cell lung cancer cells. Extract concentrations are, left to right, 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml.



FIG. 41 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuric®, Ayuflex®, Capros®, and other extracts of this invention in inhibiting proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Extract concentrations are, left to right, 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml.



FIG. 42 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of Ayuflex®, Ayuric®, Sensoril®, and other extracts of this invention in inhibiting proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. Extract concentrations are, left to right, 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml.



FIG. 43 illustrates dose-response curves of inhibitory activity of 6 different samples of hydroethanolic extracts of Withania somnifera on AML HL60 cell line cancer cells, and provides an IC50 for each sample.



FIG. 44 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of standardized aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Withania somnifera (Sensoril®), Ayuflex®, Ayuric®, and other extracts of this invention in inhibiting proliferation of histiocytic lymphoma cancer cells. Extract concentrations are, left to right, 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml.



FIG. 45 is a graph illustrating the efficacy of standardized aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts of Withania somnifera (Sensoril®), Ayuflex®, and other extracts of this invention in inhibiting proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Extract concentrations are, left to right, 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The below definitions and discussion are intended to guide understanding but are not intended to be limiting with regard to other disclosures in this application. References to percentage (%) in compositions of the present invention refers to the % by weight of a given component to the total weight of the composition being discussed, also signified by “w/w”, unless stated otherwise.


In the present invention, “anti-cancer” generally refers to preventing, treating and/or otherwise halting cancer in a subject for instance by reducing viability of cancer cells and/or cancer-associated cells, including for instance slowing the progression or growth of the cancer, stopping the progression or growth of the cancer, shrinking the cancerous tumor, reducing the number of cancer cells and/or cancer-associated cells in the subject, and/or rendering the cancer almost undetectable or undetectable in the subject. In an embodiment, cancer in a subject is diagnosed by a medical provider. In an embodiment, cancer in a subject is not diagnosed by a medical provider.


In the present invention, “anti-proliferative” and the like refers to inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells, including for instance inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells in a subject or for instance inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells such as PDCs in a cell culture outside of a subject's body, by rendering the cancer cells temporarily or permanently non-viable (not able to grow or develop) and metabolically inactive. Reference to cells “inhibited by” a composition of this invention, or other substance, is to the inhibition of proliferation of cancer cells by the composition, for instance as shown by the anti-proliferation assays described in the Examples below, unless stated otherwise. In an embodiment, inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells refers to killing cancer cells. In an embodiment, the proliferation of cancer cells may be inhibited by a composition of the present invention by 1%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100%, or for instance by 1%-100%, or any range of numbers therein, such as for instance 33-37% or 62%-75%. In an embodiment, the number of viable cancer cells may be reduced by 1%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100%, by 1%-100%, or any range of numbers therein, such as for instance 2-8% or 79-93%. Known anti-cancer agents GDC-0941 (a class I phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) inhibitor; pictilisib) and doxorubicin are shown as anti-proliferative drug controls in Example I below, inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells by about 50% to about 100%, depending e.g. on the sensitivity of the PDC type. An “anti-cancer drug” may be pictilisib, doxorubicin, temozolomide, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), ibrutinib, arsenic trioxide, and/or cytarabine, and/or any other control or standard of care drug identified in this application. Comparisons of different concentrations of standardized aqueous extracts of the present invention with the inhibition of proliferation of PDCs by GDC-0941 and doxorubicin are also shown in the Figures.


In the present invention, “cancer cells” refers to cells of, or taken from or derived from, a cancerous source, such as a solid cancerous tumor or hematopoietic cancerous tissue or cells. An example of “cancer cells” of the present invention is a mixed culture of primary patient-derived cancer cells (PDC), taken directly from an individual human subject's cancerous tissue post-surgery. PDCs may include cells from any cancer, including for instance cells from a glioma, such as a glioblastoma Grade IV; cells from a breast cancer tumor, such as breast cancer cells that are ER/PR+ Her2 equivocal, ER/PR-Her2+, or triple negative; leukemia cells from a subject having chronic lymphocytic leukemia; and/or leukemia cells from a subject having acute myeloid leukemia (e.g. M 4 subtype), and so forth. See for instance Table 1. Also, cancer cells of this invention include cells of a standard cell line, such as the cell lines discussed in the below Examples. In an embodiment, cancer cells of the present invention are part of a tumor or other cancerous cell source in a mammalian subject, such as in a human body. In an embodiment, cancer cells of the present invention include characteristics attributed to cells of a cancerous tumor or malignancy or the like, for instance as known in the art.


In the present invention, “applying” (and the like) a composition of the present invention refers to making the composition physically available to the cancer cells, for instance by administering the extract to a subject having cancer so that the extract or at least its active components reach the cancer cells in the subject's body. Applying the extract in an “effective amount” to cancer cells refers to applying the extract in an amount that will inhibit proliferation of the cancer cells, for instance as described in Example I and other Examples below.


In the present invention, “administering”, “administration”, and the like refer to providing a composition of the present invention to a subject so that the composition (or components thereof) reaches the subject's bloodstream and/or tissues and thus reaches cancer cells, and acts on the cancer cells to slow and/or stop their proliferation and render them non-viable. Administration may be by the subject or by another. Administration to the subject may be oral, for instance in the form of a dietary supplement, and/or in a solid pharmaceutical dosage form, preferably in a discrete dose unit, such as a table, hard gelatin capsule, soft gelatin capsule, etc. Administration may also be through parenteral, intramuscular, transdermal, topical, sublingual, intravenous, and other physiologically acceptable routes.


In an embodiment, references to active components and the like throughout this application are not intended as being bound by theory, as it is the administration of the full composition of the present invention which is shown to provide the remarkable inhibition of cancer cells of the present invention.


“Co-administration” refers to administering two or more compositions such as extract(s) of the present invention, or one or more such compositions with another composition or with an anti-cancer drug. Such co-administration may be at different times, so long as both extract and anti-cancer drug are available in the bloodstream and/or tissues of the subject in an effective amount to slow and/or stop the proliferation of cancer cells and in an embodiment render them non-viable. Doses of anti-cancer drug may be per the normal standard of care or at the lower end or in a lower dose, for instance in view of a subject's intolerance of adverse effects from the medication.


In the present invention, “treating cancer” and the like refers to halting the progression of cancer in a subject and/or causing the cancer including e.g. cancer cells to decrease, shrink, and if possible become or remain undetectable in the subject, for instance by reducing the size of a cancer tumor and/or number of cancerous cells. In an embodiment, the number of viable cancer cells and/or size of the tumor may be reduced by 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100%, by 1%-100%, or any range of numbers therein. In an embodiment, cancer being treated according to this invention is diagnosed in a subject by a medical professional, such that the subject has been diagnosed as having cancer. In an embodiment, cancer being treated according to this invention has not been diagnosed in a subject by a medical professional, such that the subject has not been diagnosed as having cancer, however cancer cells exist in the subject.


In an embodiment, a “subject” according to this invention is a human; in another embodiment, the subject is a mouse, rat, dog, horse, or any mammal including for instance a mammal serving as a model for cancer research, or a human. In an embodiment, treating the cancer with an “effective amount” of a composition of this invention includes administering an amount effective to slow the progression or growth of the cancer, stop the progression or growth of the cancer, shrink the cancerous tumor, reduce the number of cancer cells in the subject, and/or render the cancer almost undetectable or undetectable in the subject, and/or act against the cancer for instance as discussed elsewhere in this application or in the state of the art. “Enhancing” the treatment of cancer refers to administering a composition of this invention to a subject undergoing treatment with a different anti-cancer drug, to improve treatment outcome, as discussed throughout this application.


Compositions

A “composition” of the present invention comprises Terminalia chebula (e.g. AyuFlex®), Terminalia bellerica (e.g. Ayuric®), Phyllanthus emblica (e.g. Capros®), Withania somnifera (e.g. Sensoril®), Shilajit (e.g. PrimaVie®), Azadirachta indica (e.g. PhytoBGS®), or a combination thereof, including for instance a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica (e.g. Crominex-3+®). In an embodiment, a composition consists essentially of, or consists of, one or more of the above.


In an embodiment, a composition of this invention is an extract of Terminalia chebula (e.g. AyuFlex®), Terminalia bellerica (e.g. Ayuric®), Phyllanthus emblica (e.g. Capros®), Withania somnifera (e.g. Sensoril®), Shilajit (e.g. PrimaVie®), Azadirachta indica (e.g. PhytoBGS®), or a combination thereof, including for instance a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica (e.g. Crominex-3+®). In an embodiment, an extract of this invention refers to a natural substance prepared from Terminalia chebula fruit, Terminalia bellerica fruit, Phyllanthus emblica fruit, Withania somnifera roots and leaves, Shilajit, Azadirachta indica twigs and leaves, or a combination thereof, that has been disrupted from its natural state and treated with water or aqueous solution such as phosphate buffered saline (PBS), alcohol such as methanol or ethanol, or a hydroalcoholic mixture. In an embodiment a hydroalcoholic mixture may include alcohol and water together, for instance in a ratio of 9:1 to 1:9; in another embodiment, an extract may be prepared by first treating the plant or e.g. herbomineral material with one substance, such as ethanol, and then with a second substance, such as water or an aqueous solution. See for instance Example IX. In an embodiment, extracted substances may be pooled. In an embodiment, an extract of this invention is a standardized extract.


In an embodiment, an aqueous standardized extract of this invention is AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and/or PhytoBGS®. A composition of the present invention may be a combination, for instance, a blend of one or more extracts such as AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and/or PhytoBGS®, and/or a trivalent chromium complex such as Crominex+3®. In an embodiment Ayuflex® and Ayuric® are combined. In another embodiment, AyuFlex® and Capros® are combined. In an embodiment, Ayuric® and Capros® are combined. In an embodiment, AyuFlex®, Ayuric®, and Capros® are all combined in a composition of the present invention. In an embodiment, Sensoril® and PrimaVie® are combined. In an embodiment, Sensoril® and Phyto-BGS® are combined. In an embodiment, PrimaVie® and Phyto-BGS® are combined. In an embodiment, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and Phyto-BGS® are combined. Other combinations of the present extracts may be combined into a composition of the present invention. A composition of the present invention may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of, any extract of the present invention or combination thereof.


In an embodiment, an extract such as an aqueous standardized extract is in powdered form and may be blended together with another extract or trivalent chromium complex such as Crominex+3® or another substance, for instance in powdered form, or other solid or form. In another embodiment, the extract(s) may be for instance blended or dissolved into a composition in liquid form, or combined in another form. A composition of the present invention may further comprise one or more excipients, additives, and/or other substances, including for instance microcrystalline cellulose, croscarmellose sodium, magnesium stearate, and/or silicon dioxide; and/or a suitable aqueous solution such as a buffer solution. A composition of the present invention may be formulated into nutraceutical or pharmaceutical dosage forms comprising for instance tablets, capsules, powders, liquids, chews, gummies, transdermals, injectables, dietary supplements, topical creams or gels, lozenges, pills, and so forth. In an embodiment, a composition of the present invention is a solution comprising an extract and applied to cancer cells as in the Examples below, or used to prepare the applied solutions.


In an embodiment, a composition comprising one or more standardized aqueous extracts of this invention is administered in an effective amount to a mammal, including a daily dose for a human being of at least 1-2000 mg of at least one extract, in an embodiment at least 50 mg, 100 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, 1000 mg, 1500 mg, or 2000 mg; and optionally 1-20000 mg of each and any other extract included in the composition. In a mammal, a dose may be about the same as in a human, and may be adjusted per kilogram of weight of the mammal. A powdered blend of one or more extracts and optionally excipients or other substances such as fillers, disintegrants, flow enhancers, and lubricants, for instance, microcrystalline cellulose, croscarmellose sodium, silicon dioxide, and magnesium stearate, may be blended using standard powder blending techniques. In an embodiment, a composition of this invention may be marked as organic by an appropriate agency or organization.


Bioactive Components of Extracts of this Invention


AyuFlex® of this invention is a standardized aqueous extract of the fruits of Terminalia chebula plant, off white to brown color powder and soluble in water with astringent taste. It contains not less than 39% w/w low molecular weight hydrolysable tannins as bioactives with not less than 27% w/w chebulinic acid and chebulagic acid combined and not less than 12% w/w of other unindentified low molecular weight hydrolysable tannins. Ellagic acid and gallic acid are also present in the extract, for which the analytical results may be reported without any specification, but specifications for these bioactives may also be identified, for instance in an embodiment, each may be present in amounts of less than 10% of the extract or composition. In an embodiment, an aqueous extract of this invention, Ayuflex®, contains about 65-70% w/w low molecular weight hydrolysable tannins including about 45-50% w/w chebulinic acid and chebulagic acid combined. In an embodiment, said aqueous extract may have a measured amount of 8-9% each of gallic acid and ellagic acid. In an embodiment, a composition of this invention may be a preparation of Terminalia chebula fruit, dried and powdered and in an embodiment, standardized for pharmaceutical or nutraceutical usage. In an embodiment, an extract of this invention may be prepared from such a fruit preparation.



Terminalia bellerica (for instance, Ayuric®)—Ayuric® of this invention is a standardized aqueous extract of the fruits of Terminalia bellerica plant, brown color powder and soluble in water with astringent taste. It contains not less than 15% w/w of low molecular weight hydrolysable tannins as bioactives, including chebulinic acid and chebulagic acid and other unidentified low molecular weight hydrolysable tannins. Ellagic acid and gallic acid are also present in the extract, for which the analytical results are only reported without any specification, but specifications for these bioactives may also be identified. In an embodiment, Ayuric® is a composition of this invention and contains 33-38% w/w low molecular weight hydrolysable tannins, including chebulinic acid and chebulagic acid and other unidentified low molecular weight hydrolysable tannins, and in a further embodiment, also contains 6-8% w/w gallic acid and 0.5-2% w/w ellagic acid. In an embodiment, a composition of this invention may be a preparation of Terminalia bellerica fruit, dried and powdered and in an embodiment, standardized for pharmaceutical or nutraceutical usage. In an embodiment, an extract of this invention may be prepared from such a fruit preparation.



Phyllanthus emblica (for instance, Capros®)—Capros® of this invention is a standardized aqueous extract of the fruits of Phyllanthus emblica plant, light yellow color powder and soluble in water with astringent taste. It contains not less than 60% w/w of low molecular weight hydrolysable tannins, comprising of emblicanin-A, emblicanin-B, punigluconin and pedunculagin, and not more than 4% w/w of gallic acid. In an embodiment, Capros® as a composition of this invention contains about 75-80% w/w low molecular-weight hydrolysable tannins, and about 0.5-1.5% w/w gallic acid. In an embodiment, a composition of this invention may be a preparation of Phyllanthus emblica fruit, dried and powdered and in an embodiment, standardized for pharmaceutical or nutraceutical usage. In an embodiment, an extract of this invention may be prepared from such a fruit preparation.



Withania somnifera (for instance, Sensoril®)—Sensoril® of this invention is a standardized aqueous extract of the roots and leaves of Withania somnifera plant, brown color powder and soluble in water with bitter taste. It contains not less than 10% w/w of withanolide glycosides, less than 0.5% w/w of withanolide aglycones (as Withaferin-A) and not less than 32% w/w oligosaccharides as bioactives. Withanolides, such as withastromolide, withanolide A, withanolide B, 27-hydroxy withanone, withanone, etc. may also be present in this extract. In an embodiment, Sensoril® as a composition of this invention contains about 10-12% w/w of withanolide glycosides, about 0-0.5% w/w of withanolide aglycones (as Withaferin-A), and 35-40% w/w oligosaccharides.


In an embodiment of the present invention, an extract of Withania somnifera is made by using ethanol extraction followed by water extraction. This extract is referred to as Sensoril®-AWE (“Alcohol-Water-Extract”). Other alcohols, such as methanol, isopropyl alcohol, etc. may also be used as extraction solvents instead of ethanol. Such a hydro-alcoholic Sensoril®-AWE extract of this invention contains not less than 10% w/w withanolide glycosides, not less than 2%, preferably not less than 3.0% w/w withanolide aglycones (as Withaferin-A) and not less than 20% w/w oligosaccharides as bioactives. Withanolides, such as withastromolide, withanolide A, withanolide B, 27-hydroxy withanone, withanone, etc. may also be present in this extract. In an embodiment, a composition of this invention is a hydroethanolic Withania somnifera (Sensoril®-AWE) extract containing 12-20% w/w withanolide glycosides (including as mentioned elsewhere in this application ranges therein, such as 12% w/w, 13% w/w, and so on), 2-8% w/w withanolide aglycones (as Withaferin-A), and 24-35% w/w oligosaccharides.


Shilajit (for instance, PrimaVie®)—PrimaVie® of this invention is a standardized aqueous extract of Shilajit, an herbo-mineral exudate from the Himalayan, Altai and other mountains, brown color powder and soluble in water with earthy taste. It contains not less than 50% w/w of fulvic acid and not less than 10.3% w/w of free dibenzo-α-pyrones and dibenzo-α-pyrones conjugated with chromoproteins combined. Dibenzo-α-pyrones are also known as Urolithins, for example Urolithin A and Urolithin B. In an embodiment, PrimaVie® as a composition of this invention is a standardized aqueous extract containing 58-63% fulvic acids with a dibenzo pyrone core nucleus and 14-18% of free dibenzo-α-pyrones and dibenzo-α-pyrones conjugated with chromoproteins combined.



Azadirachta indica (for instance, PhytoBGS®)—PhytoBGS® of this invention is a standardized aqueous extract of the leaves and twigs of Azadirachta indica plant, brown color powder and soluble in water with bitter taste. It contains not less than 2% w/w of flavonoids (comprising of quercetin-3-O-glucoside, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, apigenin rutionoside and other rutin derivatives) and not less than 5% w/w and up to 20% w/w of myoinositol monophosphate as bioactives, and is devoid of possibly toxic compounds such as azadirachtone, azadiradione, nimbolide, nimbin. In an embodiment, a PhytoBGS® composition of this invention contains about 3% w/w flavonoids and 6-8% w/w myoinositol monophosphate.


Trivalent chromium complex (for instance, Crominex-3+®)—Crominex-3+® of this invention is a complex of trivalent chromium chloride, Phyllanthus emblica extract and Shilajit extract. It is a light brown color powder, soluble in water with astringent taste. It contains not less than 2% w/w of trivalent chromium as the bioactive. In an embodiment, a composition of this invention is Crominex-3+® containing 2-3% of trivalent chromium.


The bioactive compositions of the extracts described above are only representative and may differ depending on the analytical method used, especially so with natural products, as natural products contain multiple bioactives for which reference standards are not readily available in the market.


Extraction Methodology

In an embodiment, a method of manufacturing of a T. chebula fruit extract is described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,500,240, which is incorporated by reference herein for this purpose, to the extent allowed by law. The same method is used for manufacturing T. bellerica extract also.


In an embodiment, the extraction process of the current invention includes the steps of providing dried fruits of T. chebula or T. bellerica, de-seeding the fruits, pulverizing or grinding the pulp to a powder, extracting the pulp powder with an extraction solvent or solvent mixture, optionally, with heating, to provide a T. chebula or T. bellerica enriched liquid extract, optionally concentrating the liquid extract and drying the concentrated liquid extract to provide a hydrolyzable tannoid enriched T. chebula or T. bellerica extract powder. Aqueous solvent is preferred. A particularly preferred solvent is water. Useful extraction temperatures can range from about 25° C. (ambient) to about 90° C. Particularly useful extraction temperatures can range from about 25° C. to about 80° C.


In an embodiment, AyuFlex® and Ayuric® are prepared in keeping with the methods described above.


In another embodiment, ethanol or methanol or a hydro-alcoholic mixture may be used as the solvent system for extraction.


In an embodiment, useful extraction times in conjunction with maintaining useful temperatures can range from about 2 hours to about 16 hours. A particularly useful extraction time range at about 25°±5° C. is from about 12 hours to about 16 hours, and at a temperature of 40°±5° C. is from about 2 hours to about 6 hours. Length and temperature of extraction may be varied at atmospheric pressure (i.e., approx. 1 atm). It is contemplated that pressure can be varied in the extraction process, for example, by use of a commercial pressure reactor apparatus.


The extraction process can also include drying the liquid extract to a powder form. Suitable drying methods include spray drying, lyophilization (freeze drying), vacuum drying (with or without heating), evaporation (with or without heating), and concentration under vacuum. Once isolated or obtained, the hydrolyzable tannoid enriched T. chebula or T. bellerica extract powder may be processed by any suitable means, including grinding, milling, sieving, sizing, blending and the like. The obtained hydrolyzable tannoid enriched T. chebula or T. bellerica extract powder may be prepared in any suitable particle size or particle size range.


Process additives such as microcrystalline cellulose, starch, maltodextrin and the like as carrier materials, anti-adherents such as silicone dioxide, rice bran powder and the like, and preservatives such as sodium benzoate, methyl paraben, propyl paraben, natural preservatives and the like may be added during the extraction process or during the final blending of the dried extract powder.


In the case of Phyllanthus emblica extract, seeds are removed from the fresh fruits after washing, the juice is separated from the pulp by pressing and/or centrifugation and the juice is dried by spray drying or another suitable drying technique, such as microwave drying, freeze drying, etc. Additives, such as preservatives, such as sodium chloride and sodium benzoate, carrier materials such as maltodextrin, microcrystalline cellulose, anti-adherent such as silicon dioxide and rice bran powder may also be added, optionally.


In the cases of Withania somnifera, Shilajit and Azadirachta indica, the dried roots and/or leaves of the plant, the shilajit stone and the dried leaves and twigs respectively, are milled and subjected to extraction and drying. Extraction is done using water only as the solvent or an alcohol, preferably ethanol or methanol, followed by water. The liquid extract is then optionally concentrated by evaporation and then dried by spray drying, freeze drying, microwave drying or another suitable drying technique. Extraction temperatures may range from 40° C.±5° C. to 90° C.±5° C., preferably 60° C.±5° C. to 80° C.±5° C. Extraction times may vary from 1 hour to 12 hours, preferably from 2 hours to 6 hours. Several cycles of extraction may also be done. In an embodiment of Azadirachta indica, only leaves may be used as the starting raw material.


Trivalent chromium complex is made by dissolving trivalent chromium chloride in water, with or without heat, adding Phyllanthus emblica extract and mixing for a suitable length of time to form a complex, then adding shilajit and mixing for a suitable length of time, then adding a carrier material such as microcrystalline cellulose, maltodextrin, starch, etc. and mixing for a suitable length of time, followed by spray drying, freeze drying, microwave drying or another suitable drying method. The temperature of the complexation step may be from 30° C.±5° C. to 80° C.±5° C., preferably from 40° C.±5° C. to 60° C.±5° C.


In an embodiment, a “combination” of this invention refers to a mixture of an extract of the present invention with another extract, and/or a mixture of one or more extract(s) with a known anti-cancer drug, for instance those drugs used as controls and/or identified as standard of care drugs in the Examples. In an embodiment, a combination is in the same composition. In an embodiment, a composition of the present invention includes one or more extracts as described, and the combination of extract with an anti-cancer drug occurs in a subject's body. The term “combination” is not intended to be limiting in the context of this invention. Combination therapy refers to a regimen for administering an extract including a combination of extracts of this invention with an anti-cancer drug, for instance to improve treatment outcome, and/or to increase anti-cancer effects as compared with the extract(s) alone and the anti-cancer drug alone. In an embodiment, a combination according to the present invention provides a synergistic effect, greater than the effect achieved by its individual components. While references to synergy and synergistic effects may be made throughout this application, all instances of such may not be expressly pointed out.


A “dietary supplement” according to the present invention refers to a composition of this invention which is orally administered as an addition to a subject's diet, which is not a natural or conventional food, which when administered inhibits the proliferation of cancer cells in the subject's body. In an embodiment, the dietary supplement is administered daily; in an embodiment, the dietary supplement is administered daily for instance for at least 3 days, 5 days, 1 week, 1 day to 1 week, 1 week to 26 weeks, or chronically for at least 1 day to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, or 1 year or more, or for another period of time according to the present invention. A dietary supplement may be formulated into various forms, as discussed throughout this application. In an embodiment, a dietary supplement of this invention comprises one or more extracts of this invention, such as one or more aqueous standardized extracts or one or more hydroalcoholic extracts of the present invention.


EXAMPLES

The present invention may be further understood in connection with the below Examples and with embodiments described throughout this application. The following non-limiting Examples and embodiments described below and throughout this application are provided to illustrate the invention. Materials and methods used in Example I were also used with regard to the other Examples, unless indicated or expressly stated otherwise.


Example I

Anti-proliferation assays were performed on 6 types of primary patient-derived cancer cells (PDCs) from 6 different human donors, as described in Table 1:









TABLE 1







PDCs from 6 different human donors













Donor




Cancer
Gender/Age


Cancer Category
PDC
Characteristics
(years)





Solid
Glioma
Glioblastoma
M/74




Grade IV



Solid
Breast Cancer
ER/PR+ Her2
M/52




equivocal





(“HR+”)



Solid
Breast Cancer
ER/PR− Her2+
F/45




(“Her2+”)



Solid
Breast Cancer
Triple negative
F/42




(“TN”)



Hematopoietic
CLL (Chronic

M/77



lymphocytic





leukemia)




Hematopoietic
AML (Acute
M4 subtype
F/76



myeloid





leukemia)









Tests were performed in 384-well plates (24×16), using 1250 to 10,000 cells/well depending on the size and proliferation rate of different PDCs, in 30 ul of culture media (DMEM/F12 with serum and growth factors), with control wells set aside on each plate for media alone (4 wells), untreated PDCs (4 wells), and for PDCs treated with 10 ul of a known anti-cancer drug as a control. For instance, 10 ul of 40 uM GDC-0941 (pictilisib)), or 40 uM doxorubicin (2 wells each), was used, for a final concentration of 10 uM each well. The outermost rows/columns of the plates were filled with PBS (pH 7.4) to avoid an edge-effect and were considered as blanks.


Standardized aqueous extracts identified in Table 2 were prepared in main stock solutions by dissolving 1 mg of extract in 1 ml PBS (phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4).









TABLE 2







Examples of standardized aqueous extracts









Preparation type
Source
Example





Standardized

Terminalia
chebula fruits

AyuFlex ®


aqueous extract




Standardized

Terminalia
bellerica fruits

Ayuric ®


aqueous extract




Standardized

Phyllanthus
emblica fruits

Capros ®


aqueous extract




Standardized

Withania
somnifera roots + leaves

Sensoril ®


aqueous extract




Standardized
Shilajit
PrimaVie ®


aqueous extract




Standardized

Azadirachta
indica leaves + twigs

PhytoBGS ®


aqueous extract










All extracts used in this Example were provided by Natreon, Inc. (New Brunswick, N.J.).


Anti-Proliferation Assay Protocol: 30 ul of cells were plated at the density of 1250 to 10,000 cells/well. The plate was incubated in a CO2 incubator for 0/N incubation for 24 hours. Next day, 10 ul of 40 uM GDC-0941 (pictilisib) or 10 ul of 40 uM doxorubicin were added to incubated cells in the specified control drug wells, and 10 ul of 4× extract solutions were added to incubated cells in 3 concentrations: 400 ug/ml (2 wells), 120 ug/ml (3 wells), 40 ug/ml (3 wells). The final assay concentration of control drug was 10 uM for DGC-0941 (pictilisib) and doxorubicin. Final assay concentrations of made from stock solutions of standardized aqueous extracts identified in Table 2 were 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml. Since 10 ul extract was added to 30 ul of cell suspension, it diluted 4 times, so to maintain the final assay concentrations, 4× concentrated extract solutions (400 ug/ml, 120 ug/ml, and 40 ug/mo) were prepared from main stock (1 mg/ml) and added to the plate. In all experiments, 10 ul of 4 times concentrated stock (4×) was added to wells containing 30 ul of cell suspension to achieve final assay concentrations at 1X. Other anti-cancer drugs used as controls throughout this Example include temozolomide, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), ibrutinib, arsenic trioxide, and cytarabine, and were applied to PDCs generally as described.


Once extracts were added to incubated cells and mixed gently, the plate was given a brief spin and incubated in the CO2 incubator for 72 hours. The plate was removed from the incubator and 10 ul of detection reagent (CellTiterGlo®; Promega Corporation, Wisconsin, USA) added to each well of the 384 well plate. The plate was incubated (10 min) and luminescence counts measured, with luminescence produced proportional to the number of viable (living, metabolically active) cells for each assay. The assay described above is a two-dimensional (2D) assay.


References to synergy below are not intended as limiting; other instances of synergy may be present in view of the data provided below.


Results and Discussion

1. Terminalia chebula Fruit Extract (AyuFlex®)


Table 3 shows the percentage of PDCs inhibited by AyuFlex® (±Standard Deviation) in the anti-proliferation assay described above. The results are pictured in FIG. 1. Bars shown from left to right for each cell type represent the application of 100 ug Ayuflex® extract/ml, 30 ug Ayuflex® extract/ml, and 10 ug Ayuflex® extract/ml to the cells.









TABLE 3







Inhibition of PDCs by AyuFlex ®















Breast
Breast
Breast




% inhibition ±SD
Glioma
Cancer, HR+
Cancer, Her2+
Cancer, TN
CLL
AML





100 ug/ml
68 ± 2
64 ± 9
62 ± 8
77 ± 4
95 ± 2
33 ± 0


30 ug/ml
35 ± 9
50 ± 7
64 ± 7
65 ± 4
 52 ± 13
 6 ± 8


10 ug/ml
 34 ± 10
43 ± 8
52 ± 3
54 ± 3
26 ± 9
−41 ± 3 









Hematopoietic PDCs

AyuFlex® showed dose-dependent, high anti-cancer activity against CLL (Chronic lymphocytic leukemia) primary cells, with 50% of CLL cells inhibited by AyuFlex® extract at the 30 ug/ml concentration applied to the CLL cells, and 95% inhibition of CLL proliferation at the 100 ug/ml concentration. AyuFlex® inhibited about 33% of AML (acute myeloid leukemia) cells at the 100 ug/ml concentration.


Solid Tumor PDCs

AyuFlex® showed potent anti-cancer activity against all solid cancer PDCs. The most potent anti-cancer activity was seen against Breast Cancer PDCs (Triple Negative (“TN”), and ER/PR− Her2+(“Her2+”), with AyuFlex® showing more than 50% inhibition of these cells at the concentration of 10 ug/ml. Anti-cancer activity against the other Breast Cancer PDCs (“HR+”) was also high, showing 50% inhibition at greater than/equal to the 30 ug/ml concentration. Anti-cancer activity against glioma cells were also high, with 35% inhibition at 30 ug/ml and 68% inhibition at the 100 ug/ml concentration.


2. Terminalia bellerica Fruit Extract (Ayuric®)


Table 4 shows the percentage of PDCs inhibited by Ayuric® (±Standard Deviation) in the anti-proliferation assay described above. The results are pictured in FIG. 2. Bars shown from left to right for each cell type represent the application of 100 ug Ayuric® extract/ml, 30 ug Ayuric® extract/ml, and 10 ug Ayuric® extract/ml to the cell wells.









TABLE 4







Inhibition of PDCs by Ayuric ®















Breast
Breast
Breast




% inhibition ±SD
Glioma
Cancer, HR+
Cancer, Her2+
Cancer, TN
CLL
AML





100 ug/ml
47 ± 9
54 ± 11
 48 ± 13
65 ± 9
73 ± 8
30 ± 15


30 ug/ml
27 ± 9
32 ± 9 
36 ± 8
47 ± 8
 29 ± 10
5 ± 5


10 ug/ml
 20 ± 11
16 ± 13
−1 ± 3
 28 ± 10
−3 ± 4
44 ± 11









Hematopoietic Cancer PDCs

Ayuric® showed the highest anti-cancer activity against CLL primary cells, with dose-dependent inhibitory activity and 70% inhibition observed with the 100 ug/ml concentration applied to the CLL PDCs. In AML cells, Ayuric® exhibited moderate anti-cancer activity.


Solid Tumor PDCs

Ayuric® showed good to moderate anti-cancer activity for all solid cancer PDCs. Ayuric® demonstrated dose-response inhibition and about 50% inhibition of breast cancer Triple Negative PDCs. The anti-cancer activity was found to be more moderate against HR+ breast cancer PDCs and glioma cells.


3. Phyllanthus emblica Fruit Extract (Capros®)


Table 5 shows the percentage of PDCs inhibited by Capros® (±Standard Deviation) in the anti-proliferation assay described above. The results are pictured in FIG. 3. Bars shown from left to right for each cell type represent the application of 100 ug Capros® extract/ml, 30 ug Capros® extract/ml, and 10 ug Capros® extract/ml to the cell wells.









TABLE 5







Inhibition of PDCs by Capros ®















Breast
Breast
Breast




% inhibition ±SD
Glioma
Cancer, HR+
Cancer, Her2+
Cancer, TN
CLL
AML





100 ug/ml
45 ± 2
60 ± 9
53 ± 6
68 ± 6
75 ± 1
 9 ± 0


30 ug/ml
17 ± 8
34 ± 9
54 ± 7
58 ± 8
15 ± 4
23 ± 6


10 ug/ml
10 ± 1
30 ± 6
23 ± 5
 28 ± 10
−13 ± 1 
−5 ± 4









Hematopoietic PDCs

Capros® showed dose-response and highest anti-cancer activity against CLL primary cells, showing 75% inhibition at the 100 ug/ml concentration applied to the cells. In AML cells, Capros® inhibited about 25% of AML (acute myeloid leukemia) cells at the 30 ug/ml concentration.


Solid Tumor PDCs

For all solid cancer PDCs, Capros® showed good to moderate anti-cancer activity. Capros® inhibited Breast Cancer Triple Negative and Her2+ cells by 50% at the 30 ug/ml concentration, and inhibited Glioma and Breast Cancer HR+ cells by 45% and 60% at the 100 ug/ml concentration.


4. Withania somnifera Roots+Leaves (Sensoril®), Aqueous Extract


Table 6 shows the percentage of PDCs inhibited by Sensoril® (±Standard Deviation) in the anti-proliferation assay described above. The results are pictured in FIG. 4. Bars shown from left to right for each cell type represent the application of 100 ug Sensoril® extract/ml, 30 ug Sensoril® extract/ml, and 10 ug Sensoril® extract/ml to the cell wells.









TABLE 6







Inhibition of PDCs by Sensoril ®













% inhibition ±

Breast
Breast
Breast




SD
Glioma
Cancer HR+
Cancer, Her2+
Cancer TN
CLL
AML





100 ug/ml
12 ± 15
−2 ± 14
24 ± 0 
52 ± 0 
14 ± 0 
69 ± 2 


 30 ug/ml
5 ± 9
−4 ± 12
−9 ± 3 
 7 ± 11
−18 ± 3 
69 ± 13


 10 ug/ml
 8 ± 14
−9 ± 18
−9 ± 11
6 ± 8
−3 ± 8 
60 ± 13









Hematopoietic PDCs

Sensoril® showed very potent activity against AML primary cells, inhibiting ≥50% at 10 ug/ml concentration. Sensoril® did not show much anti-cancer activity for CLL.


Solid Tumor PDCs

Sensoril® inhibited the proliferation of breast cancer “TN” cells by 50% at the 100 ug/ml concentration. Sensoril® did not show substantial anti-cancer activity for glioma or the other breast cancer cells tested.


5. Shilajit (PrimaVie®)


Table 7 shows the percentage of PDCs inhibited by PrimaVie® (±Standard Deviation) in the anti-proliferation assay described above. The results are pictured in FIG. 5. Bars shown from left to right for each cell type represent the application of 100 ug PrimaVie® extract/ml, 30 ug PrimaVie® extract/ml, and 10 ug PrimaVie® extract/ml to the cell wells.









TABLE 7







Inhibition of PDCs by PrimaVie ®















Breast
Breast
Breast




% inhibition ±SD
Glioma
Cancer, HR+
Cancer, Her2+
Cancer, TN
CLL
AML





100 ug/ml
17 ± 4
17 ± 6
19 ± 0
20 ± 0 
−22 ± 19
56 ± 7


30 ug/ml
 1 ± 13
−22 ± 4 
−5 ± 0
 0 ± 11
−12 ± 20
64 ± 4


10 ug/ml
−9 ± 5
21 ± 8
−13 ± 2 
1 ± 8
 7 ± 17
25 ± 5









Hematopoietic PDCs

PrimaVie® showed the highest anti-cancer activity against AML primary cells, inhibiting ≥50% at the 30 ug/ml concentration applied to the PDCs. PrimaVie® showed a lower anti-cancer activity for CLL PDCs.


Solid Tumor PDCs

PrimaVie® showed a lower anti-cancer activity for all solid tumor PDCs.


6. Azadirachta indica Leaves+Twigs Extract (PhytoBGS®)


Table 8 shows the percentage of PDCs inhibited by Phyto-BGS® (±Standard Deviation) in the anti-proliferation assay described above. The results are pictured in FIG. 6. Bars shown from left to right for each cell type represent the application of 100 ug Phyto-BGS® extract/ml, 30 ug Phyto-BGS® extract/ml, and 10 ug Phyto-BGS® extract/ml to the cell wells.









TABLE 8







Inhibition of PDCs by Phyto-BGS ®















Breast
Breast
Breast




% inhibition ±SD
Glioma
Cancer, HR+
Cancer, Her2+
Cancer, TN
CLL
AML





100 ug/ml
26 ± 4
32 ± 9
34 ± 8
27 ± 18
−8 ± 15
37 ± 5


30 ug/ml
−1 ± 1
 9 ± 16
 7 ± 1
13 ± 12
−12 ± 20 
 54 ± 10


10 ug/ml
 4 ± 12
−13 ± 4 
−2 ± 4
 9 ± 11
−1 ± 11
28 ± 7









Hematopoietic PDCs

PhytoBGS® showed the highest anti-cancer activity against AML primary cells, showing 50% inhibition at the 30 ug/ml concentration applied to the PDCs. PhytoBGS® showed a lower anti-cancer activity for CLL PDCs.


Solid Tumor PDCs

PhytoBGS® showed a lower anti-cancer activity for all solid tumor PDCs.


Further Results: Solid Cancer Cells, Hematopoietic Cancer Cells, Combination Therapies


FIGS. 7, 9, 13, 16, 19, and 22 compare the anti-proliferative effect of the 6 different extracts tested on solid cancer cells and hematopoietic cancer cells. Bars shown from left to right for each extract represent the application of 100 ug extract/ml, 30 ug extract/ml, and 10 ug extract/ml to the cell wells.



FIG. 7 represents information provided in Tables 9-12B, showing a significant anti-cancer inhibition of proliferation of Glioma (Grade 4 Glioblastoma) cancer cells in the anti-proliferation assay. FIG. 7 compares the inhibition of proliferation of Glioma PDCs by the 6 different extracts in the assay, showing the highest inhibition by the application of known drugs 10 uM GDC-0941 (pictilisib) and 10 uM doxorubicin. Of the Extracts of the present invention, 100 ug/ml AyuFlex® showed 68% inhibition (±2, SD) of glioma PDC proliferation, as well as 35% (±9 SD) inhibition at the 30 ug/ml concentration and 34% inhibition (±10 SD) at the 10 ug/ml concentration. Capros® and Ayuric® at 100 ug/ml concentrations showed 47 and 45% inhibition of glioma PDC proliferation (±2 and 9, respectively). PhytoBGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril® inhibited glioma PDCs proliferation at the highest concentration (100 ug/ml) at 26%±4, 17%±4, and 12%±15. 10 uM drug controls (GDC-0941 (pictilisib), doxorubicin) are shown at the far right of FIG. 7.









TABLE 9







Assay Controls














Assay




Avg
SD
fold
Z′














100% Proliferation (Cell Control)
36996
5004
1298
0.59


0% Proliferation (Media only)
29
22
















TABLE 10







Assay Drug Control


GDC-0941 @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





6290
7680
83
79
81
















TABLE 11







Assay Drug Control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





6872
6345
81
83
82
















TABLE 12A







Assay Results









% Inhibition











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml


















Ayuflex
66
70
45
27
33
25
44 
33


Capros
43
46
25
9
16
9
33*
11


Phyto-BGS
24
29
 22*
−2
−1
−7
16*
2


Primavie
15
20
 16*
−7
−5
−12
15*
−5


Sensoril
23
 1*
16
0
0
−4
24 
6


Ayuric
53
40
38
21
23
9
32 
20
















TABLE 12B







Assay Results











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml














Avg %

Avg %

Avg %




Inhibition
SD
Inhibition
SD
Inhibition
SD
















AyuFlex ®
68
2
35
9
34
10


Capros ®
45
2
17
8
10
1


Phyto-BGS ®
26
4
−1
1
−2
6


PrimaVie ®
17
4
−6
2
−9
5


Sensoril ®
23
0
5
9
15
12


Ayuric ®
47
9
27
9
20
11










FIG. 8 represents information provided in Tables 13-16, showing a significant anti-cancer inhibition of glioma cell proliferation. Extracts Ayuric®, Capros®, and Ayuflex® inhibited proliferation of glioma (brain cancer) cells by about 50% or higher, alone, and also in combination with temozolomide, a current and popular drug used to treat glioma. As shown in FIG. 8, all three extracts—Ayuric®, Capros®, and Ayuflex®—showed better inhibition than temozolomide when tested alone or in combination. Temozolomide is only effective in about 20% of glioma patients. FIG. 8 shows that when combined with Ayuric®, Capros®, or Ayuflex®, the effectiveness of temozolomide is approximately doubled. The combination of temozolomide and Ayuric®, Capros®, or Ayuflex® appears to provide a synergistic inhibition of the proliferation of glioma cells.


Also, FIG. 8 shows the first application of Ayuflex® and Capros® combined; Ayuflex® and Ayuric® combined; and Capros® and Ayuric® combined on PDC glioma cells, showing 73% or higher inhibition of proliferation. The combinations of 100 ug/ml Ayuflex® and 100 ug/ml Capros® and of 100 ug/ml Capros® and 100 ug/ml Ayuric® resulted in about 75% and about 73% inhibition of glioma cell proliferation, respectively. The combination of 100 ug/ml Ayuflex® and 100 ug/ml Ayuric® resulted in about 84% inhibition of glioma cell proliferation. Doxorubicin is presented as a control drug at the far right of FIG. 8.









TABLE 13





PLATE MAP


















Cell
Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml
Capros @ 100 ug/ml
Doxorubin @ 10 uM


Control
Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +



Temozolomide @ 300 uM
Temozolomide @ 100 uM
Temozolomide @ 30 uM



Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
Capros @ 100 ug/ml +



Temozolomide @ 300 uM
Temozolomide @ 100 uM
Temozolomide @ 30 uM



Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +



Temozolomide @ 300 uM
Temozolomide @ 100 uM
Temozolomide @ 30 uM


Media
Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
Capros @ 100 ug/ml +



Capros @ 100 ug/ml
Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml
Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml



Temozolomide @ 300 uM
Temozolomide @ 100 uM
Temozolomide @ 30 uM
















TABLE 14







PLATE QUALITY CONTROL


Analysis














Assay




Avg
SD
fold
Z′














100% Proliferation (Cell Control)
62598
3313
4317
0.84


0% Proliferation (Media only)
15
1
















TABLE 15







DRUG CONTROL


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM









Avg
% Inhibition














n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg





1418
1584
2381
98
97
96
97
















TABLE 16







RESULTS OF COMBINATION STUDY











Raw data
% Inhibition
















Combination
n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD


















Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml
25994
31061
27155
58
50
57
55
4


Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
23635
28706
24030
62
54
62
59
5


Temozolomide @ 300 uM










Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
19216
26462
26112
69
58
58
62
7


Temozolomide @ 100 uM










Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
20081
25499
23823
68
59
62
63
4


Temozolomide @ 30 uM










Capros @ 100 ug/ml
27974
34706
36188
55
45
42
47
7


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
30426
34509
30327
51
45
52
49
4


Temozolomide @ 300 uM










Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
22936
30624
30757
63
51
51
55
7


Temozolomide @ 100 uM










Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
28445
34230
36564
55
45
42
47
7


Temozolomide @ 30 uM










Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
22662
27655
26418
64
56
58
59
4


Temozolomide @ 300 uM










Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
21383
26609
26896
66
58
57
60
5


Temozolomide @ 100 uM










Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
21535
28083
28708
66
55
54
58
6


Temozolomide @ 30 uM










Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
13705
16899
16306
78
73
74
75
3


Capros @ 100 ug/ml










Ayuflex @ 100 ug/ml +
8003
11131
10051
87
82
84
84
3


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml










Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
15730
18388
16458
75
71
74
73
2


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml










Temozolomide @ 300 uM
45178
54144
53028
28
14
15
19
8


Temozolomide @ 100 uM
36970
45539
44666
41
27
29
32
8


Temozolomide @ 30 uM
37016
52703
53038
41
16
15
24
15


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM
1418
1584
2381
98
97
96
97
1










FIG. 9 represents information provided in Tables 17-20B, showing the inhibition of proliferation of breast cancer cells (“HR+”, ER/PR+ Her2 Equivocal) in the anti-proliferation assay. FIG. 9 compares the inhibition of proliferation of Breast cancer “HR+” PDCs by the 6 different extracts in the assay, showing the highest inhibition by the application of control drugs GDC-0941 (pictilisib, 10 uM) and doxorubicin (10 uM). AyuFlex® showed the most potent anti-proliferative effects on these cancer cells, comparable to GDC-0941 (pictilisib), closely followed by Capros®, and then Ayuric®. Effects by PhytoBGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril® are also depicted in FIG. 9. Bars shown from left to right for each extract represent the application of 100 ug extract/ml, 30 ug extract/ml, and 10 ug extract/ml to the cell wells.









TABLE 17







Assay Controls














Assay




Avg
SD
fold
Z′














100% Proliferation (Cell Control)
64398
5624
1966
0.74


0% Proliferation (Media only)
33
20
















TABLE 18







Assay Drug Controls


GDC-0941 @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





19603
21420
70
67
68
















TABLE 19







Assay Drug Controls


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





16240
13292
75
79
77
















TABLE 20A







Assay Results









% Inhibition











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml


















Ayuflex ®
70
57
58
48
45
53
37
39


Capros ®
67
54
44
30
26
35
33
23


Phyto-BGS ®
39
26
22
−9
14
 8*
−16
−11


Primavie ®
13
21
 6*
−25
−19
26
15
−20


Sensoril ®
8
−12
 3
4
−17
11
−21
−18


Ayuric ®
61
46
42
29
24
31
12
5
















TABLE 20B







Assay Results











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml














Avg %

Avg %

Avg %




inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD

















Ayuflex ®
64
9
50
7
43
8


Capros ®
60
9
34
9
30
6


Phyto-BGS ®
32
9
9
16
−13
4


Primavie ®
17
6
−22
4
21
8


Sensoril ®
−2
14
−4
12
−9
18


Ayuric ®
54
11
32
9
16
13










FIG. 10 shows a dose-response curve of Ayuflex® on HR+ breast cancer cells (that is, breast cancer cells that are ER/PR+ Her2 equivocal). As shown in FIG. 9 and Table 20B, AyuFlex® showed 50% inhibition of HR+ breast cancer cells at 30 ug/ml doses, tested at 3 graded doses. The S-shaped dose response curve in FIG. 10 reveals an IC50 (Inhibitory Concentration 50) of about 42.41 ug Ayuflex®/ml. Table 21 shows data used to generate the dose-response curve.









TABLE 21







Dose-response curve of AyuFlex ® on HR+ breast cancer cells


Ayuflex DRC










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg

















1
200
ug/ml
81
80
100
100
100


2
100
ug/ml
6192
7135
93
92
93


3
50
ug/ml
27345
35402
70
61
65


4
25
ug/ml
51896
68951
42
23
33


5
12.5
ug/ml
66658
83762
26
7
16


6
6.3
ug/ml
59876
75427
33
16
25


7
3.1
ug/ml
72667
96931
19
−8
5


8
1.6
ug/ml
79455
99926
11
−11
0










FIG. 11 represents information provided in Table 22, showing a significant anti-cancer inhibition of HR+(ER/PR+ Her2equivocal) proliferation in combination with docetaxel (an antimicrotubule agent that inhibits spindle assembly during mitosis) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).









TABLE 22







Inhibition of HR+ with AyuFlex ®, Capros ®, Ayuric ®











Raw data
% Inhibition
















Combination
n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD


















Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
24851
31307
24077
72
65
73
70
4


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
18138
25149
23083
80
72
74
75
4


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
12153
16841
17627
86
81
80
83
3


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Docetaxel @ 3 uM
29734
41946
37833
67
53
58
59
7


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
39229
51560
50871
56
43
43
47
8


5-FU @ 3 uM


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
29313
39767
37433
67
56
58
60
6


5-FU @ 3 uM


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
19508
30418
27860
78
66
69
71
6


5-FU @ 3 uM


5-FU @ 3 uM
51975
71897
69012
42
20
23
28
12


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
17047
23164
19543
81
74
78
78
3


Capros @ 100 ug/ml


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
7683
14692
14489
91
84
84
86
4


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
9840
13176
12303
89
85
86
87
2


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM
17135
18734
22648
81
79
75
78
3










FIG. 11 shows that all three extracts—Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric®—in combination with docetaxel, showed increased, synergistic inhibition of HR+ breast cancer cell proliferation than when tested alone. 3 uM docetaxel applied to HR+ breast cancer cells in the antiproliferation assay described above inhibited HR+ breast cancer cells by about 59%. As shown in FIG. 9 and Table 20B above, Ayuflex® alone (30 ug/ml), Capros® alone (100 ug/ml), and Ayuric® alone (100 ug/ml) inhibited HR+breast cancer cells by about 50%, 60%, and 54%, respectively. FIG. 11 shows that extracts Ayuflex® (30 ug/ml), Capros® (100 ug/ml), and Ayuric® (100 ug/ml), combined with 3 uM docetaxel, inhibited proliferation of HR+ breast cancer cells by about 70%, 75%, and 83% respectively.



FIG. 11 also shows that all three extracts—Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric®—in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), showed increased, synergistic inhibition of HR+ breast cancer cell proliferation than when tested alone. 3 uM 5-FU applied to HR+ breast cancer cells in the antiproliferation assay described above inhibited HR+ breast cancer cells by about 28%. As shown in FIG. 9 and Table 20B above, Ayuflex® alone (30 ug/ml), Capros® alone (100 ug/ml), and Ayuric® alone (100 ug/ml) inhibited HR+ breast cancer cells by about 50%, 60%, and 54%, respectively. FIG. 11 shows that extracts Ayuflex® (30 ug/ml), Capros® (100 ug/ml), and Ayuric® (100 ug/ml), combined with 3 uM 5-FU, inhibited proliferation of HR+ breast cancer cells by about 47%, 60%, and 71% respectively.


Also, FIG. 11 shows that Ayuflex® and Capros® combined; Ayuflex® and Ayuric® combined; and Capros® and Ayuric® combined substantially increased inhibition of HR+ breast cancer cell proliferation over Ayuflex® (50%), Capros® (60%), and Ayuric® (54%) alone. The combination of 30 ug/ml Ayuflex® and 100 ug/ml Capros® resulted in about 78% inhibition of HR+ breast cancer cell proliferation, while the combination of 30 ug/ml Ayuflex® and 100 ug/ml Ayuric®, and of 100 ug/ml Capros® and 100 ug/ml Ayuric® inhibited HR+ breast cancer cell inhibition by about 86% and 87%, respectively. Control drug doxorubicin (10 uM) is shown as inhibiting HR+ breast cancer cell proliferation by 78%, at the far right of FIG. 11.



FIG. 12 compiles results shown in FIG. 11 and Table 22 according to the extract studied (that is, Ayuflex®, Capros®, Ayuric®). Ayuflex® (30 ug/ml) combined with 3 uM docetaxel inhibited proliferation of HR+ breast cancer cells by 70%, compared with 59% inhibition by docetaxel alone, 50% inhibition by Ayuflex® alone, and 47% inhibition when combined with 3 uM 5-FU. 3 uM 5-FU alone inhibited cell proliferation by 29%.


Capros® (100 ug/ml) combined with 3 uM docetaxel inhibited proliferation of HR+ breast cancer cells by 75%, compared with 59% inhibition by docetaxel alone, 60% inhibition by Capros® alone, and 60% inhibition when combined with 3 uM 5-FU. 3 uM 5-FU alone inhibited cell proliferation by 29%.


Ayuric® (100 ug/ml) combined with 3 uM docetaxel inhibited proliferation of HR+ breast cancer cells by 83%, compared with 59% inhibition by docetaxel alone, 54% inhibition by Ayuric® alone, and 71% inhibition when combined with 3 uM 5-FU. 3 uM 5-FU alone inhibited cell proliferation by 29%.


Each of the 3 extracts studied—Ayuflex®, Capros®, Ayuric®—showed better inhibition when used in combination with marketed drugs docetaxel and 5-FU than compared to the marketed drugs alone. Also, when these extracts were tested in the antiproliferative assay in combination with each other, for any combination of 2 of the extracts (Ayuflex® 30 ug/ml, Capros® 100 ug/ml, Ayuric® 100 ug/ml), a very good inhibition of HR+ breast cancer cell proliferation was observed, at greater than 78%. See FIG. 12, showing the combination of Ayuflex® and Capros® as inhibiting cell proliferation by 78%, Ayuflex® and Ayuric® at 86%, and Capros® and Ayuric® at 87%. For comparison, 10 uM doxorubicin is shown at the far right of FIG. 12 as inhibiting proliferation of these cells by 78%.


As shown in FIG. 9, when tested at 3 different doses, Ayuflex® showed the highest anti-cancer activity for HR+ breast cancer cells, followed by Capros® and then Ayuric®. Accordingly, the order of anti-cancer activity for the extracts alone is Ayuflex®>Capros®>Ayuric®. However, in FIGS. 11 and 12, when these extracts were tested on the same HR+ breast cancer PDCs in combination with docetaxel and 5-FU, surprisingly, Ayuric® showed the best additive activity, followed by Capros®, and then Ayuflex®. Accordingly, the order of anti-cancer activity for the combination of these extracts with docetaxel or 5-FU is Ayuric®+Drug X>Capros®+Drug X>Ayuflex®+Drug X.


Overall, all the three extracts—Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric®—showed strong anti-cancer activity against HR+ breast cancer PDCs. The cells are highly aggressive in culture; the finding and confirmation that each extract can substantially inhibit the PDCs proliferation in significant percentages in 72 hours, alone or in combination, was surprising and unexpected.



FIG. 13 represents information provided in Tables 23-26B, showing the inhibition of proliferation of breast cancer cells (“Her2+”, ER/PR− Her2+) in the anti-proliferation assay described above. FIG. 13 compares the inhibition of proliferation of Breast cancer “Her2+” PDCs by the 6 different extracts in the assay. The result of application of 10 uM GDC-0941 (pictilisib) and 10 uM doxorubicin as anti-cancer drug controls are shown to the right of the Figure. AyuFlex® showed the most potent anti-proliferative effects of the 6 extracts tested on these cancer cells, comparable to doxorubicin, closely followed by Capros®, and then Ayuric®. Effects by PhytoBGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril® are also depicted in FIG. 13.









TABLE 23







Assay Controls














Assay




Avg
SD
fold
Z′














100% Proliferation (Cell Control)
75052
7174
1464
0.71


0% Proliferation (Media only)
51
22
















TABLE 24







Assay Drug Control


GDC-0941 @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





21823
23075
71
69
70
















TABLE 25







Assay Drug Control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





28714
31853
62
58
60
















TABLE 26A







Assay Results









% Inhibition











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml



















Ayuflex ®
67
56
72 
60
60
53 
49
54


Capros ®
57
48
62 
51
49
26 
18
24


Phyto-BGS ®
29
40
35*
8
7
3
−5
−4


Primavie ®
19
−1
11*
−5
−5
13*
−12
−14


Sensoril ®
24
−6
11*
−12
−7
3
−14
−17


Ayuric ®
57
39
44 
28
37
13*
−3
2
















TABLE 26B







Assay Results











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml














Avg %

Avg %

Avg %




inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD

















Ayuflex ®
62
8
64
7
52
3


Capros ®
53
6
54
7
23
5


Phyto-BGS ®
34
8
7
1
−2
4


Primavie ®
19
0
−5
0
−13
2


Sensoril ®
24
0
−9
3
−9
11


Ayuric ®
48
13
36
8
−1
3









As Ayuflex® showed the highest anti-cancer, anti-proliferative activity of the extracts tested in FIG. 13, testing with the aim of revealing a dose-response curve and the IC50 of Ayuflex® for Her2+ breast cancer cells was performed. FIG. 14 shows a dose-response curve of Ayuflex® on Her2+ breast cancer cells. As shown in FIG. 13, AyuFlex® showed 50% inhibition of TN breast cancer cells at a 10 ug/ml dose, and was tested at 3 graded doses. The dose response curve in FIG. 14 reveals an IC50 of about 68.27 ug Ayuflex®/ml. Table 27 shows data used to generate the dose-response curve.









TABLE 27







Ayuflex Dose-Response Curve


Ayuflex DRC













Conc.

Raw data
% Inhibition














Doses
(ug/ml)
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
200
4617
8293
86
75
81


2
67
17613
20848
47
37
42


3
22
27891
32137
16
4
10


4
7
28432
30269
15
9
12


5
2
25593
27659
23
17
20


6
1
34443
32209
−3
3
0


7
0
30800
33752
8
−1
3


8
0
27215
30136
18
10
14










FIG. 15 represents information provided in Table 28, showing a significant anti-cancer inhibition of Her2+ breast cancer cell proliferation by extracts in combination with 3 uM docetaxel or 3 uM 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Ayuflex® and docetaxel together inhibited Her2+ cell proliferation by 66% and Ayuric® and docetaxel by 68%, with Capros® and docetaxel inhibiting Her2+ by about 61%. As shown in FIG. 15, docetaxel alone inhibited proliferation of the Her2+ cells by about 50%.


In contrast, 5-FU in combination with Ayuflex® (30 ug/ml) and Capros® (100 ug/ml), inhibited proliferation by about 24% and 27% respectively, as compared with 18% by 5-FU alone. FIG. 13 shows that Ayuric® inhibited proliferation of Her2+ cells by about 34%, however, Ayuric® and 5-FU together appeared to work synergistically, inhibiting proliferation by about 56%.


Finally, combinations of the three extracts share similarities in their inhibition of Her2+ cells (57%, 47%, 46% respectively for Ayuflex®/Capros®, Ayuflex®/Ayuric®, and Capros®/Ayuric®). With the exception of the combination of Ayuric® and 5-FU, the extracts share similarities in their inhibition of Her2+ cells when used in combination with docetaxel and 5-FU. It is noted that the PDCs used in this experiment were slow-growing and differed in morphology. Also, a new stock of Ayuflex® was prepared for this study, which showed a little less potency than stock used in some previous experiments.









TABLE 28







Inhibition of Her2+ breast cancer cell proliferation











Raw data
% inhibition
















Combination
n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD


















Ayuflex @30 ug/ml +
8318
13508
11954
75
60
64
66
8


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Capros @100 ug/ml +
11793
13674
13069
65
59
61
61
3


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
9029
12954
10392
73
61
69
68
6


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Docetaxel @ 3 uM
23284
18884
14463
 30*
43
57
50
9


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
24373
26114
34166
27
22
−3
24
4


5-FU@ 3 uM


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
22889
25557
17709
31
23
 47*
27
6


5-FU @ 3 uM


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
15454
20125
14086
54
 40*
58
56
3


5-FU @ 3 uM


5-FU @ 3 uM
19643
28153
26851
 41*
16
19
18
3


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
13209
19318
15708
60
 42*
53
56
5


Capros @ 100 ug/ml


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
12903
17628
17705
 61*
47
47
47
0


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
11840
17003
18991
 65*
49
43
46
4


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM
1530
1667
996
95
95
97
96
1





*Outliers







FIG. 16 represents information provided in Tables 29-32B, showing the inhibition of proliferation of breast cancer cells (“TN”, Triple Negative) in the anti-proliferation assay. FIG. 16 compares the inhibition of proliferation of Breast cancer “Triple Negative” PDCs by the 6 different extracts in the assay, with GDC-0941 (pictilisib) and doxorubicin shown at the right side of FIG. 16 as drug controls known to inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells. AyuFlex® showed the most potent anti-proliferative effects on these cancer cells, comparable to GDC-0941 and doxorubicin, closely followed by Capros®, Ayuric®, and then Sensoril®, showing anti-proliferative activity in the 100 ug/ml concentration applied to cells. Effects by PhytoBGS® and PrimaVie® are also depicted in FIG. 16.









TABLE 29







Assay Controls














Assay




Avg
SD
fold
Z′














100% Proliferation (Cell Control)
71278
6637
1262
0.72


0% Proliferation (Media only)
57
18
















TABLE 30







Assay Drug Control


GDC-0941 @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





11517
12897
84
82
83
















TABLE 31







Assay Drug Control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





19364
19643
73
72
73
















TABLE 32A







Assay Results









% Inhibition











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml



















Ayuflex ®
79
74
70
63
63
58
52
53


Capros ®
72
64
66
55
52
39
22
24


Phyto-BGS ®
40
15
26
2
10
22
3
3


Primavie ®
84
20
9
−12
2
10
−4
−3


Sensoril ®
52
19
19
−3
4
16
0
2


Ayuric ®
71
58
56
41
45
38
18
27
















TABLE 32B







Assay Results











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml














Avg %

Avg %

Avg %




inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD

















Ayuflex ®
77
4
65
4
54
3


Capros ®
68
6
58
8
28
10


Phyto-BGS ®
27
18
13
12
9
11


Primavie ®
20
0
0
11
1
8


Sensoril ®
35
24
7
11
6
8


Ayuric ®
65
9
47
8
28
10









As Ayuflex® showed the highest anti-cancer, anti-proliferative activity of the extracts tested in FIG. 16, testing with the aim of revealing a dose-response curve and the IC50 of Ayuflex® for TN breast cancer cells was performed. FIG. 17 shows a dose-response curve of Ayuflex® on TN (Triple Negative) breast cancer cells. AyuFlex® showed 50% inhibition of TN breast cancer cells at a 10 ug/ml dose, when tested at 3 graded doses. The dose response curve in FIG. 17 reveals an IC50 of about 54.61 ug Ayuflex®/ml. Table 33 shows data used to generate the dose-response curve.









TABLE 33







Ayuflex ® Dose-Response Curve


Ayuflex DRC













Conc.

Raw data
% Inhibition














Doses
(ug/ml)
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
200
12870
15012
83
80
82


2
66.7|
34601
36098
54
52
53


3
22.2
51275
55608
32
26
29


4
7.4
55229
62697
27
17
22


5
2.5
65914
76238
13
−1
6


6
0.8
67950
75290
10
0
5


7
0.3
74107
80541
2
−7
−2


8
0.1
67946
74190
10
2
6










FIG. 18 represents information provided in Table 34, showing a significant anti-cancer inhibition of TN breast cancer cell proliferation in combination with 3 uM docetaxel or 3 uM 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Ayuflex® (10 ug/ml) and docetaxel together inhibited TN cell proliferation by 63% and Ayuric® (30 ug/ml) and docetaxel by 67%, with Capros® (30 ug/ml) and docetaxel inhibiting TN cell proliferation by about 57%. Docetaxel alone inhibited proliferation of the TN cells by about 48%. In a previous study, Ayuflex® (10 ug/ml) inhibited TN cell proliferation by 54%; Capros® inhibited TN cell proliferation by 58%; and Ayuric® inhibited TN cell proliferation by 47%. The inhibition of proliferation by docetaxel and Ayuric® in particular shows synergistic results, as alone, each substance inhibited TN cell proliferation by 47-48%, but taken together, inhibition of TN cell proliferation increased nearly 20% to 67%.



FIG. 18 also shows that 5-FU (3 uM) in combination with Ayuflex® (10 ug/ml) or with Ayuric® (30 ug/ml), inhibited TN cell proliferation by 54%; and in combination with Capros®, inhibited TN cell proliferation by 49%, as compared with 38% by 5-FU alone. In addition, FIG. 18 shows that combinations of the three extracts inhibited TN cell proliferation by 55%, 51%, 55% respectively for Ayuflex® (10 ug/ml)/Capros® (30 ug/ml), Ayuflex® (10 ug/ml)/Ayuric® (30 ug/ml), and Capros® (30 ug/ml)/Ayuric® (30 ug/ml). Overall, the 3 extracts share similarities in their inhibition of TN cells, when tested alone, in combination with docetaxel and 5-FU, or in combination with each other.









TABLE 34







Inhibition of TN breast cancer cell proliferation











Raw data
% Inhibition
















Combination
n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD


















Ayuflex @ 10 ug/ml +
24205
29046
29650
68
62
61
63
4


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Capros @ 30 ug/ml +
26716
35847
35282
65
53
53
57
7


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Ayuric @ 30 ug/ml +
19960
26958
27891
74
64
63
67
6


Docetaxel @ 3 uM


Docetaxel @ 3 uM
33410
42476
42703
56
44
43
48
7


Ayuflex @ 10 ug/ml +
29616
38064
36091
61
50
52
54
6


5-FU @ 3 uM


Capros @ 30 ug/ml +
32709
43186
40709
57
43
46
49
7


5-FU @ 3 uM


Ayuric @ 30 ug/ml +
28675
36109
38462
62
52
49
54
7


5-FU @ 3 uM


5-FU @ 3 uM
39077
50221
50264
48
33
33
38
9


Ayuflex @ 10 ug/ml +
29096
36274
36747
61
52
51
55
6


Capros @ 30 ug/ml


Ayuflex @ 10 ug/ml +
32247
41305
37502
57
45
50
51
6


Ayuric @ 30 ug/ml


Capros @ 30 ug/ml +
27434
38949
35603
64
48
53
55
8


Ayuric @ 30 ug/ml


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM
4420
6305
5874
91
92
92
93
1










FIG. 19 represents information provided in Tables 35-38B, showing the inhibition of proliferation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) PDCs in the anti-proliferation assay. FIG. 19 compares the inhibition of proliferation of CLL PDCs by the 6 different extracts in the anti-proliferation assay, showing nearly 100% inhibition of AML cell proliferation with the 100 ug/ml AyuFlex® extract concentration, and anti-proliferative activity of AyuFlex® comparable to drug standards GDC-0941 (pictilisib) and doxorubicin at the 30 ug/ml concentration. Capros® and Ayuric® outperformed the drug standards at their 100 ug/ml concentrations, showing about 75% anti-proliferation activity. Effects by PhytoBGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril® are also depicted in FIG. 19.









TABLE 35







Assay Controls
















Assay





Avg
SD
fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation (Cell Control)
5930
532
84
0.71



0% Proliferation (Media only)
70
28

















TABLE 36







Assay Drug Control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





3002
2367
50
61
55
















TABLE 37







Assay Drug Control


GDC-0941 @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





2562
3477
57
42
50
















TABLE 38A







Assay Results









% Inhibition











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml



















Ayuflex ®
97
94
66 
41
49
36 
24
18


Capros ®
76
74
38*
12
19
19*
−13
−12


Phyto-BGS ®
2
−19
10 
−20
−27
12 
−6
−8


Primavie ®
−9
−36
9
−12
−31
26 
−3
−3


Sensoril ®
14
−16
4
−16
−20
3
−43
−8


Ayuric ®
78
67
39 
25
21
18*
−6
0
















TABLE 38B







Assay Results











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml














Avg %

Avg %

Avg %




inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD

















Ayuflex
95
2
52
13
26
9


Capros
75
1
15
4
−13
1


Phyto-BGS
−8
15
−12
20
−1
11


Primavie
−22
19
−12
20
7
17


Sensoril
−1
21
−11
13
−16
24


Ayuric
73
8
29
10
−3
4










As previous testing showed Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® shared good activity for inhibiting CLL PDC proliferation in the anti-proliferative assay discussed above, testing with the aim of revealing a dose-response curve and the IC50 of Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® for CLL PDCs was performed. FIG. 20 shows a dose-response curve of Ayuflex® on CLL cells, and an IC50 of 21.95 ug/ml. The 22 ug/ml IC50 for Ayuflex® was in line with about 50% inhibition observed with Ayuflex® previously. Also, an IC50 of 80.82 ug/ml was identified for Capros® and for Ayuric®, an IC50 of about 93.46 ug/ml. Tables 40-42 show data used to generate the dose-response curves for the extracts. A dose-response curve of the inhibition of CLL cells by ibrutinib is also shown in FIG. 20, and data to generate the curve shown in Table 39.









TABLE 39







Dose-response curve


Ibrutinib DRC










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
6.00E−05
20364
23884
49
40
44


2
3.00E−05
31715
32913
20
17
18


3
1.50E−05
33454
37044
15
 6
11


4
7.50E−06
36853
40636
 7
−3
2


5
3.75E−06
41353
41370
−5
−5
−5


6
1.88E−06
43486
44692
−10 
−13 
−12


7
9.38E−07
157228
77748
−299* 
−97*


8
4.69E−07
78043
49566
−98*
−26 
−26





*Outliers













TABLE 40







Dose-response curve


Ayuflex DRC










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg

















1
200
ug/ml
1274
1720
97
96
96


2
100
ug/ml
5815
132833
85
−237* 
85


3
50
ug/ml
9035
45631
77
−16*
77


4
25
ug/ml
14360
18110
64
54
59


5
12.5
ug/m
26570
30474
33
23
28


6
6.3
ug/ml
32559
34113
18
14
16


7
3.1
ug/ml
30136
33881
24
14
19


8
1.6
ug/ml
38674
42196
2
−7
−2





*Outliers













TABLE 41







Dose-response curve


Ayuric DRC










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg

















1
200
ug/ml
1510
1974
96
95
96


2
100
ug/ml
6546
8141
84
80
82


3
50
ug/ml
118831
41081
−202* 
−4
−4


4
25
ug/ml
53443
33759
−36*
14
14


5
12.5
ug/ml
32062
36771
19
 7
13


6
6.3
ug/ml
174800
69322
−344* 
−76*


7
3.1
ug/ml
80265
49847
−104* 
−26 
−26


8
1.6
ug/ml
34358
38432
13
 3
8





*Outliers













TABLE 42







Capros ® Dose-Response Curve


Capros ® DRC










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg

















1
200
ug/ml
6929
7493
83
81
82


2
100
ug/ml
13583
21326
66
46
56


3
50
ug/ml
22529
26420
43
33
38


4
25
ug/ml
29369
33909
26
14
20


5
12.5
ug/ml
32722
39366
17
0
9


6
6.3
ug/ml
34111
41002
14
−4
5


7
3.1
ug/ml
33371
41891
15
−6
5


8
1.6
ug/ml
33010
40669
16
−3
7










FIG. 21 shows, overall, that extracts of the present invention (Ayuflex®, Capros®, and Ayuric®) in combinations with each other showed better anti-cancer effects than extracts alone. Also, Ibrutinib showed a better inhibition profile for CLL cancer cells when tested in combination with these extracts than ibrutinib alone. Ibrutinib's effect can be enhanced with combined doses of extracts into subjects, according to the present invention. At the left side of FIG. 21, 3 uM ibrutinib alone inhibited CLL PDC proliferation by about 36%, however, in combination with Ayuflex® (30 ug/ml), Capros® (100 ug/ml) or Ayuric® (100 ug/ml), inhibition of proliferation increased to about 60% (Ayuflex®) or 66% (Capros®, Ayuric®). The inhibition of CLL cell proliferation by Ayuflex®, Capros®, or Ayuric® was previously measured at about 50% (Ayuflex®) and about 73-75% (Capros®, Ayuric®) (See right side of FIG. 21.)


Increasing the ibrutinib concentration to 10 uM increased the inhibition of CLL cell proliferation by ibrutinib alone by about 11%, to 41% inhibition of proliferation. In combination with Ayuflex® (30 ug/ml), Capros® (100 ug/ml) or Ayuric® (100 ug/ml), inhibition of proliferation of CLL cells changed to about 62% (Ayuflex®), 59% (Capros®), and 69% (Ayuric®). The highest level of inhibitory activity toward CLL cells shown in FIG. 21 is shown by combinations of extracts of the present invention (Ayuflex® (30 ug/ml), Capros® (100 ug/ml) or Ayuric® (100 ug/ml)). The Ayuflex®/Capros® combination shown in FIG. 21 inhibited proliferation of CLL cancer cells by 80%, while the Ayuflex®/Ayuric® combination and the Capros®/Ayuric® combination inhibited proliferation of the CLL PDCs by 88% and 90%, respectively. In contrast, as shown at the far right of FIG. 21, Ayuflex® (30 ug/ml) alone in a previous study inhibited CLL cell proliferation by 52%; Capros® (100 ug/ml), by 75%; and Ayuric® (100 ug/ml), by 73%. 10 uM doxorubicin showed relatively low inhibitory activity for CLL cells, as shown at the far right of FIG. 21. Table 43 shows data represented by FIG. 21.









TABLE 43







Inhibition of CLL PDC proliferation









% Inhibition















Avg
SD
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD





















Ibrutinib @ 3 uM
20689
27455
28014
25386
4077
48
31
29
36
10


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
13369
18253
15428
15683
2452
66
54
61
60
6


Ibrutinib @ 3 uM


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
11439
14698
14572
13570
1846
71
63
63
66
5


Ibrutinib @ 3 uM


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
11783
12997
15371
13384
1825
70
67
61
66
5


Ibrutinib @ 3 uM


Ibrutinib @ 10 uM
19340
27230
173394*
23285
5579
51
31
*
41
14


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
12542
17995
14819
15119
2739
68
55
63
62
7


Ibrutinib @ 10 uM


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
18454
16505
13407
16122
2545
53
58
66
59
6


Ibrutinib @ 10 uM


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml +
14344
12561
 9754
12220
2314
64
68
75
69
6


Ibrutinib @ 10 uM


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
6094
9211
 8212
7839
1592
85
77
79
80
4


Capros @ 100 ug/ml


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml +
5095
5394
 4257
4915
589
87
87
89
88
1


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml


Capros @ 100 ug/ml +
4269
4344
 4088
4234
132
89
89
90
90
0


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml


Ayuflex @ 30 ug/ml








52
13


{previous study}


Capros @ 100 ug/ml








75
1


{previous study}


Ayuric @ 100 ug/ml








73
8


{previous study}


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM
33348
43129
39159
38545
4919
16
−9
 1
2
13





*Outliers







FIG. 22 represents information provided in Tables 44-47B, showing the inhibition of proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) PDCs in the anti-proliferation assay. FIG. 22 compares the inhibition of proliferation of AML PDCs by the 6 different extracts in the anti-proliferation assay, with Sensoril® matching or outperforming anti-proliferative activity by drug standards GDC-0941 (pictilisib) and doxorubicin at all concentrations tested (100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, 10 ug/ml). PrimaVie® showed comparable activity to Sensoril® in its 100 ug/ml and 30 ug/ml concentrations. The PhytoBGS® 30 ug/ml concentration and the Ayuric® 10 ug/ml concentration approached the anti-proliferation effects shown by drug standard GDC-0941. Effects by AyuFlex® and Capros® are also depicted in FIG. 22. GDC-0941 (pictilisib) and doxorubicin are presented as standard drug controls at the far right of FIG. 23.









TABLE 44







Assay Controls














Assay




Avg
SD
fold
Z′














100% Proliferation (Cell Control)
15453
1102
533
0.78


0% Proliferation (Media only)
29
10
















TABLE 45







Assay Drug Control


GDC-0941 @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





6828
5808
56
63
59
















TABLE 46







Assay Drug Control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM








Avg
% Inhibition











n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg





4686
4147
70
73
72
















TABLE 47A







Assay Results









% Inhibition











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml



















Ayuflex ®
33
−11
11 
0
−54 
−66 
−43
−39 


Capros ®
9
−19
46*
19
27
 25*
−7
−2


Phyto-BGS ®
33
40
74*
61
47
32
33
20


Primavie ®
60
51
61 
67
 35*
 73*
21
28


Sensoril ®
71
67
82 
68
57
69
51
 17*


Ayuric ®
41
20
41*
8
 1
52
60
36
















TABLE 47B







Assay Results











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml














Avg %

Avg %

Avg %




inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD
inhibition
SD

















Ayuflex ®
33
0
6
8
−41
3


Capros ®
9
0
23
6
−5
4


Phyto-BGS ®
37
5
54
10
28
7


Primavie ®
56
7
64
4
25
5


Sensoril ®
69
2
69
13
60
13


Ayuric ®
30
15
5
5
44
11









As Phyto-BGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril® showed the highest anti-cancer, anti-proliferative activity for AML PDCs of the extracts tested in FIG. 22, testing with the aim of revealing a dose-response curve and IC50 for AML cancer cells was performed. FIG. 23 shows dose-response curves for Phyto-BGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril® on AML cancer cells. An IC50 of about 19.51 ug Sensoril®/ml was measured. Sensoril® showed the best anti-cancer activity of the 3 extracts tested. In a previous study, Sensoril® showed 60% inhibition at a 10 ug/ml dose, when tested at 3 graded doses. Tables 48-50 show data used to generate the dose-response curves.









TABLE 48







Dose-response curve


Phyto-BGS DRC










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg

















1
200
ug/ml
6031
8522
63
48
55


2
100
ug/ml
11057
14285
32
12
22


3
50
ug/ml
12265
15660
25
4
14


4
25
ug/ml
13697
16313
16
0
8


5
12.5
ug/ml
13577
16924
17
−4
6


6
6.3
ug/ml
14206
17655
13
−8
2


7
3.1
ug/ml
14013
15451
14
5
10


8
1.6
ug/ml
12746
14484
22
11
16
















TABLE 49







Dose-response curve


Primavie DRC










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg

















1
200
ug/ml
11209
14738
31
10
20


2
100
ug/ml
14520
18950
11
−16
−3


3
50
ug/ml
13778
17755
15
−9
3


4
25
ug/ml
14414
16829
12
−3
4


5
12.5
ug/ml
14095
15965
14
2
8


6
6.3
ug/ml
13534
16727
17
−3
7


7
3.1
ug/ml
13415
16638
18
−2
8


8
1.6
ug/ml
15363
17617
6
−8
−1
















TABLE 50







Dose-response curve


Sensoril DRC










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg

















1
200
ug/ml
238
344
99
98
98


2
100
ug/ml
474
740
97
96
96


3
50
ug/ml
3667
3860
78
76
77


4
25
ug/ml
6173
7312
62
55
59


5
12.5
ug/ml
8103
9989
50
39
45


6
6.3
ug/ml
10181
11777
38
28
33


7
3.1
ug/ml
12124
14101
26
14
20


8
1.6
ug/ml
13339
15317
18
6
12










FIG. 24 represents information provided in Table 51. Phyto-BGS® (30 ug/ml) in combination with Arsenic Trioxide (3 uM), Cytarabine (3 uM), or Doxorubicin (3 uM), inhibited AML proliferation by 86%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. PrimaVie® (30 ug/ml) in combination with Arsenic Trioxide (3 uM), Cytarabine (3 uM), or Doxorubicin (3 uM), inhibited AML proliferation by 82%, 96%, and 100%, respectively. Sensoril® (10 ug/ml) in combination with Arsenic Trioxide (3 uM), Cytarabine (3 uM), or Doxorubicin (3 uM), inhibited AML proliferation by 90%, 96%, and 100%, respectively. The known anti-cancer drugs tested—Arsenic Trioxide, Cytarabine, and Doxorubicin, are shown as inhibiting AML proliferation by 97%, 99%, and 100%. Surprisingly, in combination with each other, the extracts tested performed well when compared the known anti-cancer drugs used as controls. The combination of Phyto-BGS (30 ug/ml) and PrimaVie® (30 ug/ml) inhibited AML cell proliferation by 85%; the Phyto-BGS (30 ug/ml) and Sensoril® (10 ug/ml) combination inhibited AML cell proliferation by 97%; and the PrimaVie® (30 ug/ml) and Sensoril® combination inhibited AML cell proliferation by 100%. In a previous study Phyto-BGS® (100 ug/ml) inhibited AML cell proliferation by 37%; PrimaVie® (100 ug/ml) inhibited AML cell proliferation by 56%; and Sensoril® (10 ug/ml) inhibited AML cell proliferation by 60%. Overall, in FIG. 24, extracts in combinations showed better anti-cancer effects than extracts alone. Known AML drugs cytarabine, doxorubicin, and arsenic trioxide (each at 3 uM) alone showed greater than 95% inhibition (97-100%), whereas combinations of extracts of the present invention showed AML cell proliferation inhibition at or greater than 85% (85-100%).









TABLE 51







Inhibition of AML proliferation











Raw data
% Inhibition

















n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD



















Phyto-BGS ®@ 30 ug/ml
11231
13737
12743
35**
21
27
24
4.0


Phyto-BGS ®@30 ug/ml +
1993
2545
2608
89
85
85
86
1.9


Arsenic Trioxide@ 3 uM


Phyto-BGS ®@ 30 ug/ml +
489
635
586
97
96
97
97
0.4


Cytarabine @ 3 uM


Phyto-BGS ®@ 30 ug/ml +
56
39
49
100 
100
100
100
0.0


Doxorubicin @ 3 uM


Primavie ®@ 30 ug/ml
10627
13790
14651
39*
21
16
18
3.5


Primavie ®@ 30 ug/ml +
2766
3463
3273
84
80
81
82
2.1


Arsenic Trioxide @ 3 uM


Primavie ®@ 30 ug/ml +
686
690
731
96
96
96
96
0.1


Cytarabine @ 3 uM


Primavie ®@ 30 ug/ml +
41
66
45
100 
100
100
100
0.1


Doxorubicin @ 3 uM


Sensoril ®@ 10 ug/ml
7146
9782
10670
59*
44
39
41
3.6


Sensoril ®@ 10 ug/ml +
1470
2007
1796
92
89
90
90
1.6


Arsenic Trioxide @ 3 uM


Sensoril ®@ 10 ug/ml +
588
731
835
97
96
95
96
0.7


Cytarabine @ 3 uM


Sensoril ®@ 10 ug/ml +
34
33
42
100 
100
100
100
0.0


Doxorubicin @ 3 uM


Arsenic Trioxide@ 3 uM
551
599
484
97
97
97
97
0.3


Cytarabine@ 3 uM
203
192
140
99
99
99
99
0.2


Doxorubicin@ 3 uM
25
45
32
100 
100
100
100
0.1


PhytoBGS ®@30 ug/ml +
2545
2857
2390
85
84
86
85
1.4


Primavie ®@30 ug/ml 30 ug/l


PhytoBGS ®@30 ug/ml +
557
583
534
97
97
97
97
0.1


Sensoril ®@ 10 ug/ml


Primavie ®@30 ug/ml +
36
37
39
100 
100
100
100
0.0


Sensoril ®@ 10 ug/ml





Bolded text = Outliers






Example II
Inhibition of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cell Proliferation by Sensoril®

AML (Acute myeloid leukemia) is one of the most common types of leukemia in adults. AML is an aggressive disease in which numerous myeloblasts are found in the bone marrow and blood of a subject. AML can spread to other parts of the body including the lymph nodes, liver, spleen, central nervous system, and testicles.


Several drugs have been approved to treat AML by the US Food and Drug Administration and are available to subjects in need, however, these drugs may have less than desired efficacy and may produce undesirable side, adverse, or toxic effects. Examples of drugs currently available to treat AML include arsenic trioxide (As2O3), cytarabine, and doxorubicin. Current therapeutic targets for treating AML include inhibitors of FLT3, IDH, histone deacetylase (HDAC), and BCL-2 polo-like kinase (Plk).


Anti-cancer luminescence assays on AML primary cells included incubation with extract for 72 hours, as in Example I. Doxorubicin was used as an assay control. In this Example, AML drugs were used as disease specific controls.


As discussed above in Example I, 6 extracts (Ayuflex®, Capros®, Phyto-BGS®, PrimaVie®, Sensoril®, and Ayuric®) were tested on AML PDC-SB cells (33866, M-4 type, 76 year old subject) at 3 concentrations: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml. Three extracts (Phyto-BGS®, PrimaVie®, and Sensoril®) showed desirable activity in those tests and were further tested on the same PDCs (patient-derived cells) for determination of their IC50 values and in combination with marketed AML drugs such as cytarabine, doxorubicin, or arsenic trioxide or in combination with other extracts. Sensoril® showed the best and most remarkable anti-cancer anti-proliferative activity alone with 60% inhibition at 10 ug/ml, tested at 3 graded doses, and with an IC50 of about 20 ug/ml (See FIG. 23, showing an IC50 of 19.51 ug/ml). The plate passed quality control criteria with a Z′ of 0.63. Extracts in combinations showed synergistic anti-cancer effects compared with extracts alone. AML drugs cytarabine, doxorubicin, and arsenic trioxide alone at 3 uM concentrations showed greater than 95% inhibition. See for instance FIGS. 1-6 and 22-24 and associated Tables and related discussion above. FIG. 22 shows anti-cancer effects of Phyto-BGS®), PrimaVie®, and Sensori)®; FIG. 23 shows dose-response curves for these 3 extracts on the AML PDCs, and FIG. 24 shows efficacy of the extracts and combinations as discussed above. These studied showed in part 37% inhibition by Phyto-BGS® (100 ug/ml), 56% inhibition by PrimaVie® (100 ug/ml), and 60% inhibition by Sensoril® (10 ug/ml).


The data in Tables 52-59 and FIGS. 25-28 is from experiments using different AML PDCs than those discussed above to show Sensoril's effects on other PDCs of a different AML subtype. The AML PDCs evaluated below were an Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL, APML) subtype, APL-SB 46120, from a 15-year-old human subject.


Sensoril® was evaluated at 3 different concentrations (IC75, IC50, and IC25, derived from information such as shown in FIG. 23 and related information above), and also evaluated with IC50 and IC25 concentrations of marketed drugs, in part to show potential combinations that provide improved efficacy when administered to subjects. As the concentration of cytarabine, doxorubicin, and arsenic trioxide showed greater than 95% inhibition at 3 uM concentrations in Example I, lowering the concentrations of these drugs enabled a clearer showing of the synergistic effect of Sensoril®. In one experiment, the IC50 and IC25 of cytarabine, doxorubicin, and arsenic trioxide on the M4 APL cells discussed above and for instance in FIGS. 22-24 was determined. IC25 values were calculated using IC50 and hill slope. The IC50 and IC25 values of all three AML drugs on the M4 cells are described in Table 52. The drugs were used in these concentrations on the new APL subtype cells as described further below. Also, a dose-response curve for Sensoril® was generated in the new APL subtype PDCs, as shown in FIG. 25, and an IC50 of 32.94 ug/ml was determined for the APL subtype PDCs. As a comparison and as noted above, the IC50 for the M4 cells in previous studies was 19.5 ug/ml. Tables 53-57 present quality control and data analysis information relating to these experiments.









TABLE 52







Inhibitory Concentrations of Sensoril ® and AML drugs on AML cells











Inhibitory






Concentration






(IC)
Sensoril ®
Cytarabine
As2O3
Doxorubicin





IC25
 8.2 ug/ml
 23 nM
1.38 uM
 40.7 nM


IC50
 19.5 ug/ml
104 nM
2.99 uM
102.8 nM


IC75
46.25 ug/ml
470 nM
6.45 uM
  260 nM
















TABLE 53







Plate 1 Quality Control


Analysis













Standard





Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′














100% Proliferation
11591
1061
169
0.72


(Cell Control)






0% Proliferation
69
5




(Media only)
















TABLE 54







Plate 1 Quality Control (Doxorubicin)


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM









Average
% Inhibition














n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Average





465
486
627
97
96
95
96
















TABLE 55







Plate 2 Quality Control


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
16734
1146
167
0.79



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
101
35





(Media only)

















TABLE 56







Plate 2 Quality Control (Doxorubicin)


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM









Average
% Inhibition














n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Average





418
668
621
98
97
97
97
















TABLE 57







Plate 1 - Sensoril ® Dose-Response Curve


Sensoril ® Dose-Response Curve (DRC) (IC50 = 32.94 ug/ml)











Concentration
Raw data
Analysis














Sample
ug/ml
n1
n2
n1
n2
Average
SD

















1
200
2617
2926
78
75
77
2


2
100
3579
4065
70
65
67
3


3
50
4661
5182
60
56
58
3


4
25
7733
10052
33
13
23
14


5
12.5
9878
11050
15
5
10
7


6
6.25
12217
13830
−5
−19
−12
10


7
3.13
9193
10849
21
6
14
10


8
1.56
12252
14753
−6
−27
−17
15
















TABLE 58







Plate 1









Combination
Avg
SD












Sensoril IC75
37
7


Sensoril IC50
−13
12


Sensoril IC25
−7
20


Sensoril IC75 + Cytarabine IC50
36
4


Sensoril IC50 + Cytarabine IC50
−26
15


Sensoril IC25 + Cytarabine IC50
−20
27


Sensoril IC75 + Cytarabine IC25
46
13


Sensoril IC50 + Cytarabine IC25
−19
15


Sensoril IC25 + Cytarabine IC25
−62
7


Cytarabine IC50
20
16


Cytarabine IC25
−51
15


Doxorubin @ 10 uM
96
1
















TABLE 59







Plate 2


Plate 2











Combination
Avg
SD














Sensoril IC75 + As203 IC50
90
2



Sensoril IC50 + As203 IC50
94
1



Sensoril IC25 + As203 IC50
93
2



Sensoril IC75 + As203 IC25
93
1



Sensoril IC50 + As203 IC25
94
3



Sensoril IC25 + As203 IC25
94
1



Sensoril IC75 + Doxorubin IC50
93
3



Sensoril IC50 + Doxorubin IC50
98
2



Sensoril IC25 + Doxorubin IC50
98
1



Sensoril IC75 + Doxorubin IC25
97
2



Sensoril IC50 + Doxorubin IC25
93
1



Sensoril IC25 + Doxorubin IC25
94
2



AS203 IC50
60
9



AS203 IC25
16
14



Doxorubin IC50
43
18



Doxorubin IC25
−41
5



Doxorubin 10 uM
97
1









In FIGS. 26-28, Sensoril® was evaluated at 3 different concentrations alone (IC75, IC50, IC25; Table 52), and combined with IC50 and IC25 concentrations of AML drugs (see also Tables 58-59). Sensoril® showed additive and synergistic anti-cancer anti-proliferative effects when combined with As2O3 (FIG. 27) and Doxorubicin (FIG. 28). Sensoril® showed similar IC50 values for the AML subtype APL PDCs (approximately 31 ug/ml) and the AML (M4) PDCs of Example 1 (approximately 20 ug/ml). Arsenic trioxide and doxorubicin alone showed good efficacy compared with cytarabine alone. These results tally with clinical treatment, as arsenic trioxide and doxorubicin are preferred drugs for APL patients. In this study, Sensoril® in combination with cytarabine showed some but no significant inhibition of the subtype APL PDCs (FIG. 26).


Sensoril® shows potent anti-cancer anti-proliferative activity against different subtypes of AML, alone and in combination with drugs relevant to AML and APL treatment. Sensoril® may be administered with standard AML drugs, including at a low dose of the AML drugs, to achieve optimal efficacy and lower side effects of the drugs.


Example III
Inhibition of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell and Colon Cancer Cell Proliferation with Terminalia chebula (AyuFlex®) and Terminalia bellerica (Ayuric®)

Anti-proliferative and anti-cancer activity of extracts of this invention on non-small cell lung cancer cells and colon cancer cells were assessed generally as described in Example I and are discussed below. Terminalia chebula (AyuFlex®) and Terminalia bellerica (Ayuric®) showed significant activity. As noted throughout this application, the below data is intended to describe the present invention but not to be limiting.


Non-small cell lung cancer cells (cell line NCI-H-358) and colon cancer cells (cell line HT-29) were plated in a 384-well plate in amounts of about 1.25 k cells/well. AyuFlex®, Capros®, Phyto-BGS®, Primavie®, Sensoril®, Ayuric®, and Crominex® were added to the cells in concentrations of 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml, in triplicate, and incubated for 72 hours, and CellTiterGlo (Promega Corporation, Wisconsin, USA) used as a detection reagent, as described in Example I. Drugs used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (Standard of Care (SOC) drugs) Docetaxel (10 uM) and Doxorubicin (10 uM) were used as controls, as were drugs used to treat colon cancer (Standard of Care (SOC) drugs) 5-FU (5-fluoro-uracil, 10 uM) and Doxorubicin (10 uM). The IC50 of docetaxel for non-small cell lung cancer H-358 cells has been published as 367 nM (Intl. J. Oncol. 31:241-252 (2007)). The IC50 of 5-FU for colon cancer H-29 cells has been published as 13 uM (J. Surg. Res. 111(1):63-69 (2003)). Wells with untreated cells and with plain media were also included as controls. Plates passed quality control parameters.


Anti-Cancer Anti-Proliferative Inhibition of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells

Tables 60-62 show data for controls, and FIG. 29 shows data relating to the 7 extracts tested (AyuFlex®, Capros®, Phyto-BGS®, Primavie®, Sensoril®, Ayuric®, and Crominex®), with bars reading left to right and the associated table reading top to bottom: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml. Docetaxel exhibited 58% inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation at a 10 uM concentration. Assay control doxorubicin at 10 uM showed 78% inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation at a 10 uM concentration.


Of the 7 extracts tested and shown in FIG. 29 (left to right: Ayuflex®, Capros®, Phyto-BGS®, Primavie®, Sensoril®, Ayuric®, Crominex®, at 100, 30, and 10 ug/ml concentrations), Ayuric® showed the most potent anti-cancer and anti-proliferative effect, with 91% inhibition of proliferation at a 100 ug/ml concentration and 27% inhibition at 30 ug/ml. Ayuflex® also showed an anti-cancer anti-proliferative effect, inhibiting proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells by 40% at a 100 ug/ml concentration. The other extracts tested showed a lesser or no effect on cells of this lung cancer cell line.









TABLE 60







Plate Controls


Analysis













Standard





Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′














100% Proliferation
62761
5395
1111
0.74


(Cell Control)






0% Proliferation
57
18




(Media only)
















TABLE 61







Plate Controls - Docetaxel


Docetaxel @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





23464
28364
26690
63
55
58
58(4)
















TABLE 62







Plate Controls - Doxorubicin


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





13222
14367
14575
79
77
77
78(1)









Anti-Cancer Anti-Proliferative Inhibition of Colon Cancer Cells

Tables 63-65 show data for controls and that the data passed quality control parameters. FIG. 30 shows data relating to the 7 extracts tested (AyuFlex®, Capros®, Phyto-BGS®, Primavie®, Sensoril®, Ayuric®, and Crominex®), with bars reading left to right and the associated table reading top to bottom: 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml. 5-FU provided only 12% inhibition of colon cancer cell proliferation at a 10 uM concentration. Assay control doxorubicin showed inhibition of colon cancer cell proliferation by 94%.


Of the 7 extracts tested, Ayuric® showed the most potent anti-cancer anti-proliferative activity, providing 80% inhibition of colon cancer cell proliferation at a concentration of 100 ug/ml and 22% inhibition at 30 ug/ml. Ayuflex® inhibited colon cancer cell proliferation by 45% at a 100 ug/ml concentration. The remaining 5 extracts showed little to no effect on this colon cancer cell line.









TABLE 63







Plate Controls


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
92463
2167
1988
0.93



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
47
4





(Media only)

















TABLE 64







Plate Controls - 5-FU


5-FU @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





74375
86123
83116
20
7
10
12(7)
















TABLE 65







Plate Controls - Doxorubicin


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





5430
6159
5802
94
93
94
94(0)









Example IV
Inhibition of Glioma Cells with AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric®

As discussed with regard to FIG. 7 in Example I above, AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® showed significant dose-dependent inhibition of patient derived primary glioma cells (described in Table 1). Also, as shown in FIG. 8, AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® exhibited better inhibition than a standard-of-care drug, temozolomide, when tested alone or in combination. Combinations of these extracts (AyuFlex®+Capros®, AyuFlex®+Ayuric®, Capros®+Ayuric®) exhibited potent anti-cancer activity in the glioma PDCs, with >73% inhibition.


The anti-cancer activity of AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® was further tested on two other glioma PDCs taken from 2-3 different subjects (SB 6129, SB 32833 (55 year old male)). These glioma PDCs had a different mix of cell types (neuronal, astrocytic, dendroglioma). Also, the anti-cancer activity of AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® was further tested on existing glioblastoma cell line U87 MG, to allow comparisons with other compositions known in the art. AyuFlex®, Capros®, and/or Ayuric® were incubated with the new PDC lines and the U87 MG cell line for 72 hours, as described in Example I above.


Tables 66-67 show data for controls and that the data passed quality control parameters. Table 68 relates to FIG. 31, a graph showing the efficacy of AyuFlex®, Capros®, and/or Ayuric® on Glioma SB 32833 Glioblastoma Grade IV patient derived cells, in a combination study. The graph shows, left to right, % inhibition of SB 32833 PDCs by AyuFlex® (100, 30, 10 ug/ml); Capros® (100, 30, 10 ug/ml); and Ayuric® (100, 30, 10 ug/ml); as well as combinations AyuFlex® (100 ug/ml)+Capros® (100 ug/ml), AyuFlex® (100 ug/ml)+Ayuric® (100 ug/ml), AyuFlex® (30 ug/ml)+Capros® (100 ug/ml), AyuFlex® (30 ug/ml)+Ayuric® (100 ug/ml), and Capros® (100 ug/ml)+Ayuric (100 ug/ml). (GDC-0941@10 uM, Doxorubicin@10 uM, and Temozolomide@100 uM shown at far right). FIG. 32 also shows the efficacy of the above extract doses (same as for FIG. 31) and combinations on glioma SB 6129 (anaplastic astrocytoma Grade III PDCs. FIG. 33 shows the efficacy of AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® (same extract doses as FIG. 31) after a 72 hour incubation on known cell line U87-MG (glioblastoma) A dose-dependent effect was observed for all 3 extracts, with the anti-cancer effect on SB 32833 PDCs comparable to that described in Example 1 including FIGS. 7-8 above.









TABLE 66







Control data


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
39636
4762
855
0.64



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
46
25





(Media only)

















TABLE 67







Doxorubicin control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





3578
5759
5708
91
86
86
87
















TABLE 68







Inhibition of Glioma Cells











Raw data
% Inhibition
















Combination
n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD


















Ayuflex 100 ug/ml
4306
5649
5809
89
86
85
87
2


Ayuflex 30 ug/ml
8975
11126
12150
77
72
69
73
4


Ayuflex 10 ug/ml
17236
23956
23625
57
40
40
46
10


Capros 100 ug/ml
10643
13866
12564
73
65
68
69
4


Capros 30 ug/ml
21842
29142
29043
45
27
27
33
11


Capros 10 ug/ml
27354
36276
35965
31
8
9
16
13


Ayuric 100 ug/ml
5066
7275
7389
87
82
81
84
3


Ayuric 30 ug/ml
14419
20278
18373
64
49
54
55
8


Ayuric 10 ug/ml
15383
19439
19324
61
51
51
55
6


Ayuflex 100 ug/ml +
3083
4733
5300
92
88
87
89
3


Capros 100 ug/ml










Ayuflex 100 ug/ml +
474
1034
589
99
98
99
98
1


Ayuric 100 ug/ml










Ayuflex 30 ug/ml +
5109
8377
8192
87
79
79
82
5


Capros 100 ug/ml










Ayuflex 30 ug/ml +
4701
5847
5574
88
85
86
87
2


Ayuric 100 ug/ml










Capros 100 ug/ml +
15
15
20
100
100
100
100
0


Ayuric 100 ug/ml










GDC-0941 @ 10 uM
20
16
16
100
100
100
100
0


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM
3578
5759
5708
91
86
86
87
3


Temozolomide @ 100 uM
23511
31320
32454
41
21
18
27
12










In the three independent studies using 3 different gliomas (1 grade III and 2 grade IV gliomas), AyuFlex®, Capros®, and/or Ayuric® alone and in combination exhibited significant anti-cancer effects. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most challenging brain tumor to treat, as patients generally do not live more than 1-2 years. Temozolomide is one of the only approved treatments, or the only treatment, for gliomas, however, 50-70% of patients treated with temozolomide have been reported as non-responders to temozolomide. Accordingly, the present invention includes treatment with AyuFlex®, Capros®, and/or Ayuric®, or other compositions of the present invention.


Example V
Inhibition of AML Cells with Sensoril®, Phyto-BGS, and PrimaVie®

As shown in FIGS. 22, 24, 26, 27, and 28, Sensoril®, Phyto-BGS® and PrimaVie® compositions of this invention inhibited 2 different types of AML PDCs. As shown in this Example, Sensoril®, Phyto-BGS®, and PrimaVie® compositions, and also a Crominex® composition, inhibited cancer cell proliferation in an AML cell line: HL60.


Inhibition assays were generally run as described for other AML assays above, with 5000 cells per well in 384 well plates. Standard-of-care drugs cytarabine (3 uM), arsenic trioxide (As2O3) (60 uM) and doxorubicin (10 uM) were assayed as controls. Phyto-GBS®, PrimaVie®, and Crominex® were assayed at 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml concentrations, and Sensoril® tested with a 9-point, 2-fold dose response curve (DRC), starting from 200 ug/ml. CellTiterGlo detection reagent was used, as discussed for instance in Example I above, and the 4 compositions were incubated with the cells for 72 hours. Tables 69-70 show data for controls and that the data passed quality control parameters.









TABLE 69







Assay controls—Plate 1


Analysis













Standard





Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′














100% Proliferation
43535
2633
2561
0.82


(Cell Control)






0% Proliferation
17
1




(Media only)
















TABLE 70







Assay controls—Plate 2


Analysis













Standard





Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′














100% Proliferation
87067
5601
189
0.81


(Cell Control)






0% Proliferation
461
18




(Media only)









As shown in FIG. 34, Phyto-BGS® and PrimaVie® showed dose-dependent anti-cancer effects on HL60 cells, with greater than 60% inhibition at a dose of 100 ug/ml. Crominex® demonstrated 30-40% inhibition at all doses (100, 30, 10 ug/ml). Control standard-of-care drugs cytarabine (3 uM), As2O3 (60 uM), and doxorubicin (3 uM) exhibited 90% or higher inhibition of the HL60 AML cells.



FIG. 35 shows dose-response curves of Sensoril®, cytarabine, AS2O3, and doxorubicin on the HL60 lines, with the dose-response curve for Sensoril® showing an IC50 for inhibition of HL60 cells of 67 ug/ml; the curve for cytarabine showing an IC50 of 567 nM; the curve for As2O3 showing an IC50 of 2.3 uM; and the curve for doxorubicin showing an IC50 of 79 nM. Combinations of Sensoril® with cytarabine, As2O3, and doxorubicin are expected to inhibit HL60 AML cells, for instance as shown in Table 71.









TABLE 71







Potential dosing for further experiments on HL60 AML cells












Sensoril ®
Cytarabine
As2O3
Doxorubicin



(ug/ml)
(uM)
(uM)
(uM)














IC75
109.65
1.08
3.01
0.106


IC50
67.13
0.567
2.43
0.079


IC25
41.10
0.298
1.72
0.059









Example VI
Inhibition of Triple Negative (TN) Breast Cancer PDCs (SB 30750) and TNBC Cell Line MDAMB-231 with AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric®

As shown for instance in FIGS. 16-18, AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® showed exceptional anti-cancer effects against SB 36344 cells. AyuFlex® (10 ug/ml) was previously shown to inhibit TN breast cancer PDCs by 54%; Capros® (30 ug/ml), by 58%; and Ayuric® (30 ug/ml) by 47%.


In this Example, AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® were each applied to different PDCs than previous tests, TN breast cancer PDCs SB 30750, and tested via the anti-proliferation assay described above. As shown in FIG. 36, each of AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® was applied to the SB 30750 PDCs alone in concentrations of 100, 30, and 10 ug/ml, and combined as follows: AyuFlex® (30 ug/ml)+Capros® (30 ug/ml), AyuFlex® (30 ug/ml)+Ayuric® (30 ug/ml), AyuFlex® (10 ug/ml)+Capros® (30 ug/ml), AyuFlex® (10 ug/ml)+Ayuric® (30 ug/ml), and Capros® (30 ug/ml)+Ayuric® (30 ug/ml). Docetaxel (3 uM), 5-FU (3 uM), and doxorubicin (10 uM) controls are shown at the far right of the Figure. Incubation times were 72 hours. AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® each showed a dose-dependent effect in the SB 30750 PDCs, and showed similar anti-cancer, inhibitory effects to the inhibition seen in the PDC cells of a different subject (SB 36344) tested in FIGS. 16 and 18.


Also, AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® were tested in the anti-proliferative assay discussed above in the TN Breast Cancer cell line MDAMB-231. AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® were incubated for 72 hours and 120 hours. The dose-response efficacy of AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® after a 72-hour period of incubation was similar to that observed after a 120-hour period of incubation with the MDAMB-231 cells. Without being bound by theory, possibly this was due to saturation of cell growth at the 120-hour time-point.


Surprisingly, AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® extracts showed better activity in both PDCs than in the MDAMB-231 cell line. The MDAMB-231 cell line was established from pleural effusion of a Caucasian female with a metastatic mammary adenocarcinoma 1, and has a high stem cell percentage. The TNBC PDCs used in earlier studies (shown in FIGS. 16-18) were from Grade II and TNM-T2N1aMx tumor, and the PDCs of the present Example (SB 30750) are from a Grade I and TNM-T2N1aMx tumor, both likely lower grade and non-metastatic tumors compared with MDAMB-231 cells. Without being bound by theory, it may be that the extracts are more active in earlier stage tumors than metastatic ones.


In summary, with the results of this Example VI and previous studies described herein, AyuFlex®, Capros®, and Ayuric® extracts demonstrated reproducible anti-cancer effects in 3 independent experiments using two different TNVC cancer patient derived cells.









TABLE 72







Plate Controls


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
74408
9061
1413
0.63



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
53
6





(Media only)

















TABLE 73







Doxorubicin control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





16406
23949
31038
78
68
58
68
















TABLE 74







Inhibition of TNBC PDCs (SB 30750) by AyuFlex ®, Capros ®, and Ayuric ®










Raw data
% Inhibition















Combination
n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD


















Ayuflex 100 ug/ml
23242
33738
33268
69
55
55
60
8


Ayuflex 30 ug/ml
27053
33894
37482
64
54
50
56
7


Ayuflex 10 ug/ml
45510
63323
62574
39
15
16
23
14


Capros 100 ug/ml
25381
34302
35137
66
54
53
58
7


Capros 30 ug/ml
54237
63005
68764
27
15
8
17
10


Capros 10 ug/ml
50700
70923
69595
32
5
6
14
15


Ayuric 100 ug/ml
25631
37388
44444
66
50
40
52
13


Ayuric 30 ug/ml
30833
42730
58052
59
43
22
41
18


Ayuric 10 ug/ml
45673
59207
64851
39
20
13
24
13


Ayuflex 30 ug/ml +
18056
22928
25595
76
69
66
70
5


Capros 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 30 ug/ml +
14857
17538
19683
80
76
74
77
3


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 10 ug/ml +
25519
33410
39663
66
55
47
56
10


Capros 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 10 ug/ml +
22904
30026
31629
69
60
58
62
6


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Capros 30 ug/ml +
20621
29043
29474
72
61
60
65
7


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Docetaxel @ 3 uM
24001
35688
39462
68
52
47
56
11


5-FU @ 3 uM
41465
63866
64261
44
14
14
24
18


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM
16406
23949
31038
78
68
58
68
10
















TABLE 75







Inhibition of MDAMB-231 cell line by AyuFlex ®, Capros ®, and


Ayuric ® (72 hour incubation)











Raw data
% Inhibition
















Combination
n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD


















Ayuflex 100 ug/ml
58945
77704
76140
44
27
28
33
10


Ayuflex 30 ug/ml
80393
98268
102334
24
7
3
11
11


Ayuflex 10 ug/ml
92286
122115
122215
 13*
−15
−16
−15
0


Capros 100 ug/ml
70641
92822
95695
33
12
10
18
13


Capros 30 ug/ml
108078
130370
132500
−2
−23
−25
−17
13


Capros 10 ug/ml
97875
128124
134081
 7
−21
−27
−13
18


Ayuric 100 ug/ml
57505
70158
69844
46
34
34
38
7


Ayuric 30 ug/ml
75642
98513
97248
29
7
8
15
12


Ayuric 10 ug/ml
83078
106876
105518
21
−1
0
7
13


Ayuflex 30 ug/ml +
74411
92848
90342
30
12
15
19
9


Capros 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 30 ug/ml +
70949
87917
86978
33
17
18
23
9


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 10 ug/ml +
85852
108852
101693
19
−3
4
7
11


Capros 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 10 ug/ml +
70288
95788
94340
34
9
11
18
14


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Capros 30 ug/ml +
75562
97654
99317
29
8
6
14
13


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Docetaxel @ 3 uM
35229
52837
50750
67
50
52
56
9


5-FU @ 3 uM
83364
111466
110358
21
−5
−4
4
15


Doxorubicin 10 uM
23120
28746
28430
78
73
73
75
3
















TABLE 76







Inhibition of MDAMB-231 cell line by AyuFlex ®, Capros ®, and


Ayuric ® (120 hour incubation)











Raw data
% Inhibition
















Combination
n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
Avg
SD


















Ayuflex 100 ug/ml
56389
77349
72974
56
39
43
46
9


Ayuflex 30 ug/ml
78537
95588
95641
39
25
25
30
8


Ayuflex 10 ug/ml
95138
130502
131567
 25*
−2
−3
−3
1


Capros 100 ug/ml
70583
95001
98086
 45*
26
23
24
2


Capros 30 ug/ml
125560
155502
161033
 2*
−22
−26
−24
3


Capros 10 ug/ml
122241
159839
154609
 4*
−25
−21
−23
3


Ayuric 100 ug/ml
58558
77747
74476
54
39
42
45
8


Ayuric 30 ug/ml
89163
111142
108375
30
13
15
19
9


Ayuric 10 ug/ml
102684
130666
135088
 20*
−2
−6
−4
2


Ayuflex 30 ug/ml +
71269
97666
90166
44
24
29
32
11


Capros 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 30 ug/ml +
72855
89938
87457
43
30
32
35
7


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 10 ug/ml +
88342
111648
115247
 31*
13
10
11
2


Capros 30 ug/ml










Ayuflex 10 ug/ml +
81695
99895
96079
36
22
25
28
8


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Capros 30 ug/ml +
78312
100528
103458
39
21
19
26
11


Ayuric 30 ug/ml










Docetaxel @ 3 uM
28378
36725
30693
78
71
76
75
3


5-FU @ 3 uM
102508
140779
134513
 20*
−10
−5
−8
3


Doxorubicin 10 uM
7939
11844
10217
94
91
92
92
2









Example VII
Inhibition of Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells with Different Extracts

SHP-77 (small cell lung cancer) cells were incubated for 72 hours with 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml each of AyuFlex®, Capros® Phyto-BGS®, PrimaVie®, Sensoril®, Ayuric®, and Crominex®, and tested according to the anti-proliferative assay described above. Cells were plated at 1.25 k/well in 384 well plates. Standard of care drug docetaxel was also tested at a 10 uM concentration as a control. Anti-proliferative assays were generally performed as discussed above, in triplicate, with detection reagent CellTiterGlo® as discussed for instance in Example I. Tables 77-79 show data for controls and that the data passed quality control parameters.









TABLE 77







Plate Controls


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
49047
3203
30
0.79



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
1613
79





(Media only)

















TABLE 78







Docetaxel control


Docetaxel @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





6365
5908
6786
90
91
89
90(1)
















TABLE 79







Doxorubicin control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





4634
5086
5168
94
93
93
93(1)









Docetaxel, a drug currently used for the treatment of small cell lung cancer, exhibited 90% inhibition of cell proliferation at the 10 uM concentration tested. The assay control, doxorubicin, exhibited 93% inhibition at the 10 uM concentration tested.


Of the extracts tested, AyuFlex® and Ayuric® exhibited the most potent anti-cancer effect on the SHP-77 small cell lung cancer cell line, exhibiting 98% inhibition at 100 ug/ml. The anti-cancer activity of the extracts on SHP-77 cells is similar to that of H-358 cells (non-small cell cancer, NSCLC, shown in Example III), with Ayuric® and AyuFlex® also showing the best anti-cancer effect in those cells.


Example VIII

Prostate cancer (PC-3) cells and Ovarian cancer (OVCAR-3) cells were incubated for 72 hours with 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml each of AyuFlex®, Capros® Phyto-BGS®, PrimaVie®, Sensoril®, Ayuric®, and Crominex®, and tested according to the anti-proliferative assay described above. Cells were plated at 1.25 k/well in 384 well plates. Standard of care drug docetaxel and control doxorubicin were each also tested at a 10 uM concentration. Anti-proliferative assays were generally performed as discussed in Example I above, in triplicate, with detection reagent CellTiterGlo. Tables 80-82 show data for controls for assays on prostate cancer (PC-3 cells), and that the data passed quality control parameters. Tables 83-85 show data for controls for assays on ovarian cancer (OVCAR-3 cells), and that the data passed quality control parameters.









TABLE 80







Plate Controls


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
54196
3632
415
0.80



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
131
37





(Media only)

















TABLE 81







Docetaxel control


Docetaxel @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





25757
18168
24121
53
67
56
58(7)
















TABLE 82







Doxorubicin control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





16210
16521
15937
70
70
71
70(1)
















TABLE 83







Plate Controls


Analysis













Standard





Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′














100% Proliferation
45784
1777
595
0.88


(Cell Control)






0% Proliferation
77
6




(Media only)
















TABLE 84







Docetaxel control


Docetaxel @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





16072
14601
15965
65
68
65
66(2)
















TABLE 85







Doxorubicin control


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





12071
11517
9891
74
75
79
76(2)









With regard to prostate cancer (PC-3) cells, docetaxel, a drug currently used for the treatment of prostate cancer, exhibited 58% inhibition of cell proliferation at the 10 uM concentration tested. The assay control, doxorubicin, exhibited 70% inhibition at the 10 uM concentration tested.


Of the extracts tested, Ayuric® exhibited the most potent anti-cancer effect on the prostate cancer (PC-3) cell line, exhibiting 79% inhibition at 100 ug/ml; followed by AyuFlex®, which exhibited 50% inhibition in the assay at 100 ug/ml.


With regard to ovarian cancer (OVCAR-3) cells, docetaxel, a drug currently used for the treatment of ovarian cancer, exhibited 66% inhibition of cell proliferation at the 10 uM concentration tested. The assay control, doxorubicin, exhibited 76% inhibition at the 10 uM concentration tested.


Of the extracts tested, Ayuric® exhibited the most potent anti-cancer effect on the ovarian cancer cell line, exhibiting 92% inhibition of cell proliferation at 100 ug/ml, and 23% inhibition at 30 ug/ml. The next effective extracts against the proliferation of the OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cells were AyuFlex® and Sensoril®, exhibiting 46% and 35% inhibition respectively at 100 ug/ml.


Example IX
Inhibition of AML (HL60 Cell Line) Cancer Cells with Hydroethanolic Extracts of Withania somnifera (Sensoril®-AWE)

Hydroethanolic extracts of Withania somnifera (Sensoril®-AWE) showed significant anti-cancer effects in AML cancer cells of the HL60 cell line. 2500 cells were plated per well in 384 well plates. Standard of care drug doxorubicin was included as a control at 10 uM. 6 different samples of Sensoril®-AWE, prepared with hydroethanolic extraction were tested in the anti-proliferative assay as generally described in Example I above. Extracts were prepared at 2 mg/ml concentrations in view of increased solubility and tested at 400 ug/ml, 2-fold serial dilutions, to prepare an 8-point Dose-Response Curve. CellTiter Glo was used as a detection reagent. Extracts were incubated with the AML HL60 cells for 72 hours. Table 86 provides information on hydroethanolic extract quantification and markers according to this invention. Full analysis of some Samples described below are as follows: Lot #WS09120: 19.34% w/w Withanolide glycosides, 7.52% w/w Withanolide Aglycones (as Withaferin A), 34.42% w/w Oligosaccharides; Lot #WS09820: 13.16% w/w Withanolide glycosides, 2.60% w/w Withanolide Aglycones (as Withaferin A), 26.52% w/w Oligosaccharides; Lot #WS09920: 12.68% w/w Withanolide glycosides, 2.71% w/w Withanolide Aglycones (as Withaferin A), 23.55% w/w Oligosaccharides; Lot #WS10020: 12.20% w/w Withanolide glycosides, 2.39% w/w Withanolide Aglycones (as Withaferin A), 24.64% w/w Oligosaccharides. Tables 87-90 show data for controls and that the data passed quality control parameters.


All hydroethanolic samples of Withania somnifera (Sensoril®-AWE) showed a sigmoidal saturated IC50 dose-response curve with significant inhibition of AML HL60 cell proliferation. The most potent sample was the “Nepal” sample (Sample 1 of Table 91 below, Lot #WS09120), which showed an IC50 of 17.5 ug/ml, with Sample 2, based solely on Withania somnifera leaves, following closely with an IC50 of 19.2 ug/ml. Sample 3, 4, and 6 showed higher IC50 values, ranging from 26-28 ug/ml, and Sample 5 showed lowest activity with an IC50 of 48.7 ug/ml. See Table 91 for further information on Sample preparation and a listing of IC50 s found for each Sample, Tables 92-97 for experimental data relating to the Samples, and FIG. 43 for relevant dose-response curves.









TABLE 86








Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) hydroethanolic extracts (Sensoril ®-AWE) of the present invention











Quantification using




Withanoside-IV and
Quantification using



Withanolide-A as Markers
individual markers

















Total

Total


Sample name
Class of

Content
Content
Content
Content


(Lot#)
analytes
Analytes
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
















WS09420_Leaf
Withanolide
Withaferin A
0.88
1.45
0.76
1.57


(70% ethanol)
aglycones
Withastromonolide


0.10





Withanolide A


0.05





Withanolide B


0.02





27-Hydroxy Withanone


0.08





Withanone


0.00




Withanolide
Withanoside IV
0.57

0.40




glycosides
Withanoside V


0.17



WS09320_Root
Withanolide
Withaferin A
1.03
1.58
0.99
1.85


(70% ethanol)
aglycones
Withastromonolide


0.10





Withanolide A


0.07





Withanolide B


0.02





27-Hydroxy Withanone


0.07





Withanone


0.00




Withanolide
Withanoside IV
0.55

0.40




glycosides
Withanoside V


0.19



WS09220_Leaf:Root
Withanolide
Withaferin A
0.71
1.21
0.56
1.45


(70% ethanol)
aglycones
Withastromonolide


0.12





Withanolide A


0.08





Withanolide B


0.02





27-Hydroxy Withanone


0.05





Withanone


0.00




Withanolide
Withanoside IV
0.49

0.43




glycosides
Withanoside V


0.19



WS08920_Leaf
Withanolide
Withaferin A
0.94
1.45
1.36
2.11


(100% ethanol)
aglycones
Withastromonolide


0.07



Followed by water

Withanolide A


0.02





Withanolide B


0.00





27-Hydroxy Withanone


0.12





Withanone


0.00




Withanolide
Withanoside IV
0.51

0.39




glycosides
Withanoside V


0.16



WS09020_Root
Withanolide
Withaferin A
0.64
0.99
0.60
1.09


(100% ethanol)
aglycones
Withastromonolide


0.05



Followed by water

Withanolide A


0.05





Withanolide B


0.01





27-Hydroxy Withanone


0.05





Withanone


0.00




Withanolide
Withanoside IV
0.34

0.23




glycosides
Withanoside V


0.10



WS09120_Leaf:Root
Withanolide
Withaferin A
1.75
2.46
1.64
2.81


(100% ethanol)
aglycones
Withastromonolide


0.15





Withanolide A


0.14





Withanolide B


0.03





27-Hydroxy Withanone


0.10





Withanone


0.00




Withanolide
Withanoside IV
0.70

0.47




glycosides
Withanoside V


0.27
















TABLE 87







Assay Plate 1


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
21647
1706
2405
0.76



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
9
1





(Media only)

















TABLE 88







Plate 1 - Doxorubicin 10 uM


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





17
10
13
100
100
100
0.0
















TABLE 89







Assay Plate 2


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
22538
2131
1439
0.72



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
16
4





(Media only)

















TABLE 90







Plate 2 - Doxorubicin 10 uM


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





10
11
10
100
100
100
0.0
















TABLE 91







IC50 of Different Examples of Withania somnifera (Sensoril ®-AWE)


Hydroethanolic Extracts












Withania somnifera

IC50



Sample/Lot #
part used
(ug/ml)
Extraction Process













1/#WS09120
Nepal (Root + Leaf)
17.5
Ethanol followed by aqueous


2/#WS08920
Leaf
19.2
Ethanol followed by aqueous


3/#WS09920
Root
28.1
Ethanol followed by aqueous


4/#WS09820
Leaf + Root
26.7
Ethanol followed by aqueous


5/#WS09020
Leaf + Root
48.7
Ethanol followed by aqueous


6/#WS10020
Leaf + Root
27.78
Ethanol followed by aqueous
















TABLE 92








Withania somnifera (Sensoril ®-AWE) Hydroethanolic



Extract Sample 1 (“Nepal,” Root + Leaf)


Sensoril (Nepal)











Conc.
Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
(ug · ml
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
400
29
24
100
100
100


2
200
19
18
100
100
100


3
100
35
29
100
100
100


4
50
100
92
100
100
100


5
25
1824
1972
92
91
91


6
13
21358
21524
1
1
1


7
6
26242
25684
−21
−19
−20


8
3
23562
21011
−9
3
−3
















TABLE 93








Withania somnifera (Sensoril ®-AWE) Hydroethanolic Extract Sample 2



Sensoril Lot # WS08920










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
400
30
31
100
100
100


2
200
18
17
100
100
100


3
100
69
64
100
100
100


4
50
272
251
99
99
99


5
25
6670
5389
69
75
72


6
13
23535
24001
−9
−11
−10


7
6
28535
27853
−32
−29
−30


8
3
26615
27234
−23
−26
−24
















TABLE 94








Withania somnifera (Sensoril ®-AWE) Hydroethanolic Extract Sample 3



Sensoril # WS 9920










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
400
12
9
100
100
100


2
200
23
25
100
100
100


3
100
84
66
100
100
100


4
50
806
636
96
97
97


5
25
19036
16768
12
23
17


6
13
27425
24977
−27
−15
−21


7
6
26766
26654
−24
−23
−23


8
3
27133
26806
−25
−24
−25
















TABLE 95








Withania somnifera (Sensoril ®-AWE) Hydroethanolic Extract Sample 4



Sensoril # WS 9820











Conc.
Raw Data
% Inhibition













Doses
(ug, ml
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
400
23
21
100
100
100


2
200
74
30
100
100
100


3
100
112
87
100
100
100


4
50
745
620
97
97
97


5
25
15188
15170
30
30
30


6
13
24973
24967
−15
−15
−15


7
6
26116
24970
−21
−15
−18


8
3
25775
25723
−19
−19
−19
















TABLE 96








Withania somnifera (Sensoril ®-AWE) Hydroethanolic Extract Sample 5



Sensoril # WS 9020










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
400
44
85
100
100
100


2
200
88
68
100
100
100


3
100
393
357
98
98
98


4
50
10464
9713
52
55
53


5
25
21450
20206
1
7
4


6
13
24551
22741
−13
−5
−9


7
6
21259
19835
2
8
5


8
3
21984
19733
−2
9
4
















TABLE 97








Withania somnifera (Sensoril ®-AWE) Hydroethanolic Extract Sample 6



Sensoril # WS 10020










Raw data
% Inhibition













Doses
Conc.
n1
n2
n1
n2
Avg
















1
400
29
27
100
100
100


2
200
25
22
100
100
100


3
100
78
66
100
100
100


4
50
483
356
98
98
98


5
25
15121
12884
30
40
35


6
13
23885
21962
−10
−1
−6


7
6
21871
21417
−1
1
0


8
3
21346
20448
1
6
3









Example X
Inhibition of Histiocytic Lymphoma and Pancreatic Cancer Cells with Different Extracts

Histiocytic lymphoma (U-937) cells and Pancreatic cancer (Panc-1) cells were incubated for 72 hours with 100 ug/ml, 30 ug/ml, and 10 ug/ml each of fresh samples of AyuFlex®, Capros®, Phyto-BGS®, 2 different samples of Shilajit (PrimaVie®) extracts, several different samples of hydroethanolic Withania somnifera (Sensoril®-AWE) extracts, and Ayuric®. Cells were plated at 1.25 k/well in 384 well plates. Standard of care drug doxorubicin was also tested at a 10 uM concentration. Anti-proliferative assays were generally performed as described in Example I above, in triplicate, with detection reagent CellTiterGlo. Tables 98-99 show data for controls for assays on histiocytic lymphoma (U-937) cells, and that the data passed quality control parameters. Tables 101-102 show data for controls for assays on pancreatic cancer (Panc-1) cells, and that the data passed quality control parameters.


Tables 100 and 103 show data relating to the inhibition of histiocytic lymphoma (U-937) cells and pancreatic cancer (Panc-1) cells by extracts of this invention. The assay is generally as described in Example I.









TABLE 98







Assay Plate


Analysis















Standard






Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′

















100% Proliferation
52629
4256
1847
0.76



(Cell Control)







0% Proliferation
29
4





(Media only)





















TABLE 99







Doxorubicin 10 uM


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





58
50
70
100
100
100
100(0)
















TABLE 100







Inhibition of histiocytic lymphoma cancer cell (U-937 cell line) proliferation with different extracts











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml















S.

% Inhibition
Avg %

Avg %

Avg %


















No.
Extracts
100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml
Inhibition
SD
Inhibition
SD
Inhibition
SD


























1
Ayuflex
61
58
64
12
7
10
−9
−11
0
61
3
9
3
−6
6


2
Capros
−6
−7
−8
−12
−6
2
−6
−6
−3
−7
1
−6
7
−5
2


3
Phyto-BGS
−19
−19
−17
−11
−9
−3
−9
−8
−3
−18
1
−8
4
−7
3


4
Primavie
−3
−13
−1
−13
−13
−15
−7
−12
−18
−5
6
−13
1
−12
6


5
Sensoril
−19
−5
0
4
10
22
11
9
−3
−8
10
12
9
6
8


6
Ayuric
44
45
45
−4
1
13
−8
−11
−12
45
0
4
9
−10
2


7
Sensoril
99
99
99
97
97
98
42
40
38
99
0
97
0
40
2



(Nepal)


8
Sensoril
6
3
8
21
20
20
20
21
21
6
2
20
0
21
0



(Patel)


9
Sensoril
9
6
8
−4
4
8
1
−8
−1
7
1
2
6
−3
5



(Fitochem)


10
Primavie
30
29
36
16
18
15
NA
NA
NA
31
4
16
2
NA
NA



(Fitochem)
















TABLE 101







Assay Plate


Analysis













Standard





Average
Deviation
Assay fold
Z′














100% Proliferation
63086
3225
1043
0.85


(Cell Control)






0% Proliferation
61
9




(Media only)
















TABLE 102







Doxorubicin 10 uM


Doxorubicin @ 10 uM










% Inhibition










Average

Average













n1
n2
n3
n1
n2
n3
(SD)





3908
4011
3437
94
94
95
94(0)
















TABLE 103







Inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell (Panc-1 cell line) proliferation with different extracts











100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml















S.

% Inhibition
Avg %

Avg %

Avg %


















No.
Extracts
100 ug/ml
30 ug/ml
10 ug/ml
Inhibition
SD
Inhibition
SD
Inhibition
SD


























1
Ayuflex
36
36
35
2
−1
−1
−4
0
4
36
1
0
2
0
4


2
Capros
15
9
12
0
4
1
10
12
11
12
3
2
2
11
1


3
Phyto-BGS
6
5
0
3
4
4
5
5
4
4
3
4
1
5
1


4
Primavie
−1
3
5
6
7
4
1
8
2
2
3
6
1
4
4


5
Sensoril
13
8
9
9
9
5
8
18
15
10
3
8
2
14
5



(Sakti)


6
Ayuric
32
29
35
12
14
13
18
18
22
32
3
13
1
19
2


7
Sensoril
55
56
55
71
67
60
24
30
25
55
1
66
6
26
3



(Nepal)





















8
Sensoril
22
22
28
Not Done
27
23
25
24
4
NA
NA
25
2



Patel





















9
Sensoril
17
16
21
20
18
14
Not Done
18
3
18
3
NA
NA



(Fitochem)










FIG. 44 shows the anti-cancer, anti-proliferative effects of extract compositions of this invention on histiocytic lymphoma (U-937 cell line) cancer cells. Hydroethanolic extracts of Withania somnifera (Sensoril®-AWE) showed the most potent anti-cancer effects against the histiocytic lymphoma cells, with about 100% inhibition at 100 ug/ml and 30 ug/ml doses, and 40% inhibition at the 10 ug/ml dose. The next most effective extracts were Ayuflex® and Ayuric®, which showed 60% and 45% inhibition at the 100 ug/ml doses. The assay control, doxorubicin, showed 100% inhibition at 10 uM.



FIG. 45 shows the anti-cancer, anti-proliferative effects of extract compositions of this invention on pancreatic cancer (Panc-1 cell line) cancer cells. Hydroethanolic extracts of Withania somnifera (Sensoril®-AWE) showed the most potent anti-cancer effect, with 50-60% at 100 ug/ml and 30 ug/ml doses, followed by 26% inhibition at the 10 ug/ml concentration. The next most effective extract was Ayuflex®, showing greater than 30% inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell growth (Panc-1 cell line) at 100 ug/ml. The assay control, doxorubicin, showed 94% inhibition at 10 uM.


Discussion

Compositions of the present invention provide anti-cancer activity, as shown by the remarkable inhibition of cancer cell proliferation by compositions of this invention in the above Examples. Anti-proliferative activity was seen with the present compositions in glioma cancer cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cancer cells, acute myeloid leukemia cancer cells, small cell lung cancer cells, non-small lung cancer cells, colon cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and ovarian cancer cells. Inhibition was seen with different extracts on difference cancer cell types, sometimes with similar or even synergistic effects with combinations of extracts and/or extract(s) with a known anti-cancer drug. See for instance FIGS. 8, 11, 15, 18, 27-28, 31-33, and 36.


For instance, Ayuflex® and Ayuric® inhibited the proliferation of several cancer cell types, including pancreatic, ovarian, prostatic, small cell lung cancer, and colon cancer cells. Ayuflex® and Ayuric® may be administered for instance with standard non-small cell lung cancer and colon cancer drugs, and other drugs useful in treating cancer, including a low dose of said drugs to achieve optimal efficacy and lower side effects of the drugs. In an embodiment, a composition of the present invention may be used with a standard of care cancer drug to minimize the amount of standard of care drug given to a subject. Given the harsh adverse and toxic effects of many known cancer drugs, the present invention provides a useful method for co-administration with such drugs.


Also for instance Sensoril® showed potent anti-cancer and anti-proliferative activity against different subtypes of AML, alone and synergistically in combination with drugs relevant to AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia) and subtype APL (Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL, APML)) treatment such as arsenic trioxide and doxorubicin. Hydroethanolic Sensoril®-AWE compositions were shown to be effective against AML HL60 cell line cancer cells. Sensoril® or Hydroethanolic Sensoril® (Sensoril®-AWE) may be administered with standard AML drugs, including at a low dose of the AML drugs, to achieve optimal efficacy and lower side effects of the drugs.


Several embodiments of the present invention are set out herein. In addition to the below, embodiments supported by the above Examples are intended as general embodiments of the invention, similar to the below.


A method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells and/or cancer-associated cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Terminalia chebula fruits, and applying said composition to said cancer cells to inhibit proliferation of the cells. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract of the Terminalia chebula fruits, and said extract is Ayuflex®. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are glioma cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, acute myeloid leukemia cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, small cell lung cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and/or colon cancer cells. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, glioma cells, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, breast cancer “HR+” cells, breast cancer “Her2+” cells, or breast cancer “triple negative” cells. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, and/or enhancing the treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Terminalia chebula fruits, and administering an effective amount of said composition to treat and/or enhance treatment of cancer in the subject. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract of the Terminalia chebula fruits, and said extract is Ayuflex®. In an embodiment, said cancer is glioma, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, non-small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and/or colon cancer. In an embodiment, said cancer is chronic lymphocytic leukemia, glioma, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, breast cancer “HR+”, breast cancer “Her2+”, or breast cancer “triple negative”.


A method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits, and applying said composition to said cancer cells to inhibit proliferation of the cells. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract of the Terminalia bellerica fruits, and said extract is Ayuric®. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are glioma cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, acute myeloid leukemia cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and/or colon cancer cells. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, breast cancer “HR+” cells, breast cancer “Her2+” cells, breast cancer “triple negative” cells, acute myeloid leukemia cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and/or colon cancer cells. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, and/or enhancing the treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits, and administering said composition in an effective amount to treat and/or enhance treatment of cancer in the subject. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits, and said extract is Ayuric®. In an embodiment, said cancer is glioma, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, non-small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and/or colon cancer. In an embodiment, said cancer is chronic lymphocytic leukemia, breast cancer “HR+”, breast cancer “Her2+”, breast cancer “triple negative”, or acute myeloid leukemia.


A method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits, and applying said composition to said cancer cells to inhibit proliferation of the cells. The method of claim 17, wherein said composition is a standardized aqueous extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits, and said extract is Capros®. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are glioma cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, and/or acute myeloid leukemia cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and/or colon cancer cells. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, breast cancer “Her2+” cells, or breast cancer “triple negative” cells. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof and/or enhancing the treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits, and administering said composition in an effective amount to treat and/or enhance treatment of cancer in the subject. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract of said Phyllanthus emblica fruits, and said extract is Capros®. In an embodiment, said cancer is glioma, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, non-small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and/or colon cancer. In an embodiment, said cancer is chronic lymphocytic leukemia, breast cancer “Her2+”, or breast cancer “triple negative.”


A method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, and applying said composition to said cancer cells to inhibit proliferation of the cells. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract or is a standardized hydroalcoholic extract of said leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, and said extract is Sensoril®. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are glioma cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, acute myeloid leukemia cells including APL cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, and/or colon cancer cells. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are acute myeloid leukemia cells or breast cancer “triple negative” cells. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, and/or enhancing the treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, and administering said composition in an effective amount to treat and/or enhance treatment of cancer in the subject. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract or a standardized hydroalcoholic extract of the leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, and said extract is Sensoril® or Sensoril®-AWE. In an embodiment, said cancer is glioma, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia including APL, non-small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and/or colon cancer. In an embodiment, said cancer is acute myeloid leukemia or breast cancer “triple negative”.


A method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Shilajit and applying said composition to said cancer cells to inhibit proliferation of the cells. In an embodiment, said extract is a standardized aqueous extract of Shilajit, and said extract is Primavie®. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are glioma cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, acute myeloid leukemia cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, and/or colon cancer cells. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are acute myeloid leukemia cells. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, and/or enhancing the treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Shilajit, and administering said composition in an effective amount to treat and/or enhance treatment of cancer in the subject. In an embodiment, said extract is a standardized aqueous extract of Shilajit, and said extract is Primavie®. In an embodiment, said cancer is glioma, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, non-small cell lung cancer, and/or colon cancer. In an embodiment, said cancer is acute myeloid leukemia.


A method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs, and applying said composition to said cancer cells to inhibit proliferation of the cells. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract, and said extract is PhytoBGS®. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are glioma cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, acute myeloid leukemia cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, and/or colon cancer cells. In an embodiment, said cancer cells are acute myeloid leukemia cells or breast cancer “Her2+” cells. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, and/or enhancing the treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising an extract of Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs, and administering said composition in an effective amount to treat and/or enhance treatment of cancer in the subject. In an embodiment, said composition is a standardized aqueous extract, and said extract is PhytoBGS®. In an embodiment, said cancer is glioma, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, non-small cell lung cancer, and/or colon cancer. In an embodiment, said cancer is acute myeloid leukemia or breast cancer “Her2+”.


Other embodiments of this invention include a composition comprising a at least one of Terminalia chebula fruits, Terminalia bellerica fruits, Phyllanthus emblica fruits, Withania somnifera roots and leaves, Shilajit, Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs, or a standardized alcohol-water extract of the leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves of Withania somnifera. In an embodiment, said Terminalia chebula fruit extract is AyuFlex®, said Terminalia bellerica fruit extract is Ayuric®, said Phyllanthus emblica fruit extract is Capros®, said Withania somnifera roots and/or leaves extract is Sensoril®, said Shilajit extract is PrimaVie®, and said Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs extract is PhytoBGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia chebula fruit extract and a Terminalia bellerica fruit extract, and optionally where said T. chebula extract is AyuFlex® and said T. bellerica extract is Ayuric®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia chebula fruit extract and a Phyllanthus emblica fruit extract, and optionally where said T. chebula extract is AyuFlex® and said P. emblica extract is Capros®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia chebula fruit extract and a Withania somnifera roots and leaves extract, or a standardized alcohol-water extract of the leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves of Withania somnifera, and optionally where said T. chebula extract is AyuFlex® and said W. somnifera extract is Sensoril®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia chebula fruit extract and a Shilajit extract, and optionally where said T. chebula extract is AyuFlex® and said Shilajit extract is PrimaVie®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia chebula fruit extract and an Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs extract, and optionally where said T. chebula extract is AyuFlex® and said A. indica extract is PhytoBGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia bellerica fruit extract and a Phyllanthus emblica fruit extract, and optionally where said T. bellerica extract is Ayuric® and said P. emblica extract is Capros®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia bellerica fruit extract and a Withania somnifera roots and/or leaves extract, and optionally where said T. bellerica extract is Ayuric® and said W. somnifera extract is Sensoril®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia bellerica fruit extract and a Shilajit extract, and optionally where said T. bellerica extract is Ayuric® and said Shilajit extract is PrimaVie®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Terminalia bellerica fruit extract and an Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs extract, and optionally where said T. bellerica extract is Ayuric® and said A. indica extract is PhytoBGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Phyllanthus emblica fruit extract and a Withania somnifera roots and/or leaves extract, and optionally where said P. emblica extract is Capros® and said W. somnifera extract is Sensoril®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Phyllanthus emblica fruit extract and a Shilajit extract, and optionally where said P. emblica extract is Capros® and said Shilajit extract is PrimaVie®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Phyllanthus emblica fruit extract and an Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs extract, and optionally where said P. emblica extract is Capros® and said A. indica extract is PhytoBGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Withania somnifera roots and leaves extract and a Shilajit extract, and optionally where said W. somnifera extract is Sensoril® and said Shilajit extract is PrimaVie®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Withania somnifera roots and/or leaves extract and an Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs extract, and optionally where said W. somnifera extract is Sensoril® and said A. indica extract is PhytoBGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises a Shilajit extract and an Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs extract, and optionally where said Shilajit extract is PrimaVie® and said A. indica extract is PhytoBGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprising Ayuflex® and Ayuric®. In an embodiment, said composition comprising Ayuflex® and Capros®. In an embodiment, said composition comprising Ayuric® and Capros®. In an embodiment, said composition comprising Ayuflex®, Ayuric®, and Capros®. In an embodiment, said composition comprising Sensoril® and PrimaVie®. In an embodiment, said composition comprising Sensoril® and Phyto-BGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprising PrimaVie® and Phyto-BGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprising Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and Phyto-BGS®. In an embodiment, said composition comprises Crominex+3®. In an embodiment, said composition further comprises an anti-cancer drug; in an embodiment, said anti-cancer drug is pictilisib, doxorubicin, temozolomide, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), ibrutinib, arsenic trioxide, and/or cytarabine, and/or any other anti-cancer drug, preferably identified in this application. In an embodiment, said composition comprises co-administration with an anti-cancer drug. In an embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, and/or enhancing the treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising at least one extract, optionally a standardized aqueous extract that is Ayuflex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and/or PhytoBGS® or a hydroalcoholic extract that is Sensoril-AWE or a trivalent chromium complex that is Crominex+3®, and administering said composition in combination with an anti-cancer drug in an effective amount to treat and/or enhance treatment of cancer in the subject. In an embodiment, said anti-cancer drug is pictilisib, doxorubicin, temozolomide, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), ibrutinib, arsenic trioxide, and/or cytarabine, and/or any other anti-cancer drug identified in this application. In an embodiment, a composition of the present invention comprises a combination of an anti-cancer drug, and in a separate composition, an extract. In an embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising at least one extract, preferably a standardized aqueous extract, preferably Ayuflex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, PrimaVie®, and/or PhytoBGS®, and administering said composition in combination with an anti-proliferation drug in an effective amount to inhibit the proliferation of the cancer cells.


The use of the terms “a,” “an,” “the,” and similar referents in the context of describing the present invention (especially in the context of the claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. Use of the term “about” is intended to describe values either above or below the stated value in a range of approximately ±20%; in other embodiments, the values may range in value above or below the stated value in a range of approximately ±5%; in other embodiments, the values may range in value above or below the stated value in a range of approximately ±2%; in other embodiments, the values may range in value above or below the stated value in a range of approximately ±1%. The preceding ranges are intended to be made clear by context, and no further limitation is implied. All method steps described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise stated. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.


While in the foregoing specification the present invention has been described in relation to certain embodiments thereof, and many details have been put forth for the purposes of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is susceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the details described herein can be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention.


The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof, and, accordingly, reference should be made to the appended claims, rather than to the foregoing specification, as indicating the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method of inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells and/or cancer-associated cells comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising at least one of the group consisting of an extract of Terminalia chebula fruits, an extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits, an extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits, an extract of Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, an extract of Shilajit, an extract of Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs, and a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica; and applying said composition to said cancer cells to inhibit proliferation of the cells.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said extract is a standardized aqueous extract.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein said extract of Terminalia chebula fruits is Ayuflex®, said extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits is Ayuric®, said extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits is Capros®, said extract of Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves is Sensoril®, said extract of Shilajit is Primavie®, said extract of Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs is PhytoBGS®, and said trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica is Crominex+3®.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said cancer cells are glioma cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, acute myeloid leukemia cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, small cell lung cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, histiocytic lymphoma cells, and/or colon cancer cells.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said extract is a standardized hydroalcoholic extract of said Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, and said extract is Sensoril-AWE®.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said cancer cells are glioma cells, breast cancer cells, chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, acute myeloid leukemia cells, non-small cell lung cancer cells, small cell lung cancer cells, prostate cancer cells, ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells, histiocytic lymphoma cells, and/or colon cancer cells.
  • 7. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, and/or enhancing the treatment of cancer in a subject in need thereof, comprising the steps of providing a composition comprising at least one of the group consisting of an extract of Terminalia chebula fruits, an extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits, an extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits, an extract of Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, an extract of Shilajit, an extract of Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs, and a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica; and administering an effective amount of said composition to treat and/or enhance treatment of cancer in the subject.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein said extract is a standardized aqueous extract.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein said extract of Terminalia chebula fruits is Ayuflex®, said extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits is Ayuric®, said extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits is Capros®, said extract of Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves is Sensoril®, said extract of Shilajit is Primavie®, said extract of Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs is PhytoBGS®, and said trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica is Crominex+3®.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein said cancer is glioma, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, histiocytic lymphoma, and/or colon cancer.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein said extract is a standardized hydroalcoholic extract of said Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, and said extract is Sensoril-AWE®.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein said cancer is cancer is glioma, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, histiocytic lymphoma, and/or colon cancer.
  • 13. A composition comprising at least one of the group consisting of an extract of Terminalia chebula fruits, an extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits, an extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits, an extract of Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, an extract of Shilajit, an extract of Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs, and a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica.
  • 14. The composition of claim 13, wherein said composition comprises at least two of the group consisting of an extract of Terminalia chebula fruits, an extract of Terminalia bellerica fruits, an extract of Phyllanthus emblica fruits, an extract of Withania somnifera leaves, roots, or roots plus leaves, an extract of Shilajit, an extract of Azadirachta indica leaves and twigs, and a trivalent chromium complex with extracts of Shilajit and P. emblica.
  • 15. The composition of claim 14, wherein said extract is a standardized aqueous extract, a standardized alcoholic extract, or a standardized hydroalcoholic extract.
  • 16. The composition of claim 14, wherein said composition comprises two or more of the group consisting of Ayuflex®, Ayuric®, Capros®, Sensoril®, Sensoril-AWE®, Primavie®, PhytoBGS®, and Crominex+3®.
  • 17. The composition of claim 16, further comprising an anti-cancer drug.
  • 18. The composition of claim 17, wherein said anti-cancer drug is pictilisib, doxorubicin, temozolomide, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), ibrutinib, arsenic trioxide, and/or cytarabine.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
202041009290 Mar 2020 IN national
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210315959 A1 Oct 2021 US