The present invention generally relates to control valves in high pressure fluid transfer systems, such as waterworks systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to an anti-cavitation assembly for use in such control valves so as to impart anti-cavitation and low-noise properties.
When subjected to high-pressure differentials or high flow rates, valves often exhibit excessive noise and vibration. This is usually attributable to the phenomenon of cavitation, which can range from relatively harmless levels called incipient cavitation to significant more acute levels that actually damage valves, other components, and related piping. Cavitation occurs as the velocity of the fluid in the valve seating area becomes excessive, creating a sudden severe reduction in pressure that transforms the liquid into a vapor, resulting in the formation of thousands of small bubbles. The subsequent decrease of velocity and pressure rise that occurs after the valve seating area, when the pressurized condition resumes, causes these vapor bubbles to collapse at the rate of many times per second. This can damage surfaces of the valve and piping. Over time, this can lead to valve failure due to the vibration and/or erosion.
Minimizing or eliminating the conditions that adversely affect operation and service life of the valve continues to be one of the most serious challenges encountered in the daily operation of a water distribution system, such as municipal water systems and the like. To overcome the adverse effects of the orifice action of the valve, it has become common practice to design the valve so as to break up the flow through the valve into a multitude of small streams which are then led through convoluted paths to produce energy losses in the fluid. Such designs are known as tortuous fluid flow redirection.
Various valve assemblies are known which serve to suppress vibration, pressure fluctuations, cavitation and noise. Some are rendered ineffective due to varying flows, which can make their devices ineffective. Yet others are prone to fouling or clogging due to the use of small apertures, requiring that the fluid must be filtered before passing through the valve assembly. There exist other anti-cavitation valve seats and assemblies that are generally good at preventing cavitation damage at pressure drops up to 150 psi. However, market trends are now looking for valve products capable of performing trouble free at higher pressure drops, such as 300 psi or higher.
Accordingly, there is a need for a new anti-cavitation valve assembly which overcomes the drawbacks and shortcomings of prior anti-cavitation valve designs. Such an assembly should be capable of operating at much higher pressure drops, such as 300 psi or higher. The present invention fulfills these needs, and provides other related advantages.
The present invention resides in an anti-cavitation valve assembly which minimizes or even eliminates fluid cavitation, and its attendant noise and damage, as fluid flows through a valve, such as a control or main valve of a waterworks system. Use of the anti-cavitation valve assembly of the present invention allows such control valves to perform trouble free at higher pressure drops, such as three hundred psi or higher.
The anti-cavitation valve assembly of the present invention generally comprises a seat fixedly positionable within a fluid pathway between a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet of a valve. The seat has a circumferential wall at least partially defining an inner seat chamber. The wall has a plurality of spaced apart elongated seat apertures formed therein. The seat apertures have varying opening width along a length thereof.
A disc guide is slidably movable relative to the seat so as to cooperate with the seat in opening and closing fluid flow between the inlet and outlet of the valve. The disc guide includes a wall having a plurality of spaced apart disc guide apertures formed therein. Typically, the wall of the disc guide has an upper portion having the disc guide apertures formed therein in a lower portion that increasingly occludes the seat apertures as the disc guide is moved into the closed position. Preferably, the disc guide apertures are formed at a non-normal angle through the disc guide wall. There are typically a greater number of disc guide apertures than seat apertures. There may be twice as many disc guide apertures as seat apertures.
A tortuous fluid flow pathway is formed as fluid enters through the seat apertures and into the inner seat chamber and exit through the disc guide apertures to minimize fluid cavitation.
The seat apertures are arranged so as to direct fluid to converge in the seat inner chamber. The seat apertures are geometrically configured to have a larger opening width at a top portion thereof and a smaller opening width at a lower portion thereof. The seat apertures may have a lower tip opening, a lower opening portion of a generally consistent width, a middle portion having an increasingly wider width, and a top portion having a generally consistent width.
When the assembly is open 10% or less, the collective flow through the seat apertures is as small as 25% of the collective flow area through the disc guide apertures. When the assembly is open 10%-25%, the collective flow area through the seat apertures is approximately half of the collective flow area through the disc guide apertures. When the assembly is open 25% to 80%, the collective flow area through the seat apertures increases until 80% or greater open when the collective flow area through the seat apertures and the disc guide apertures are approximately equal.
A deflector wall may extend upwardly from a base of the seat in spaced relation to the seat apertures. The deflector wall may have a scalloped or irregular top edge. The deflector wall may be tapered inwardly away from the seat apertures. The non-apertured lower portion of the disc guide wall extends into the space between the seat apertures and the deflector wall when moved towards a closed position.
A boss extends upwardly through the base of the seat and has a through aperture that accepts a stem associated with a disc guide therein. The boss is configured to vary fluid flow therethrough and into the seat inner chamber as the stem is moved along a length of the boss.
A perimeter lip of the disc guide is engageable with an upper portion of the seat. The perimeter lip of the disc guide has a chamfered profile that improves valve regulation stability when the lip is disposed adjacent to the seat.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following more detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
The accompanying drawings illustrate the invention. In such drawings:
As shown in the accompanying drawings, for purpose of illustration, the present invention resides in an anti-cavitation assembly which imparts anti-cavitation and noise-reducing characteristics to a main valve or other control valve in fluid transfer systems, such as waterworks systems.
With reference now to
In a standard valve, without anti-cavitation properties, a seat is disposed between the inlet 14 and outlet 16. The seat is in general alignment with the disc retainer 24 and more particularly the disc 26, such that as the disc 26 is lowered it comes into engagement with an upper portion of the seat so as to open or close fluid flow through the valve 10.
As is known in the art, when the pressure in a pressure chamber 30 of the valve 10 is proportionally less than the pressure at the valve inlet 14, pressure forces overcome forces of a spring 32, which biases the diaphragm washer 22, diaphragm 28, disc retainer 24, and disc 26 upwardly into the pressure chamber 30, thus opening the valve 10, as illustrated in
In the present invention, an anti-cavitation assembly 100 is incorporated into the valve 10, which includes a seat 102 and a disc guide 104. As will be more fully described below, the seat 102 and disc guide 104 cooperatively form a tortuous pathway for the fluid to pass through, creating pressure drops in the fluid and avoiding cavitation and noise and the drawbacks associated with such. The anti-cavitation assembly 100 of the present invention is designed so as to be capable of performing trouble free at higher pressure drops, such as three hundred psi or higher. The anti-cavitation assembly 100 is designed to accomplish this goal without reducing the flow capacity through the valve 10.
The seat 102 may include an attachment feature or mechanism, such as the illustrated external threads 106, so as to attach the seat 102 to the body 12 of the valve 10. It is contemplated by the invention that the seat 102 could be attached to the body 12 of the valve 10 by other features or mechanisms, so long as the attachment provides a substantially waterproof seal therebetween. With reference to
As can be seen in
As can be seen in the attached illustrations, the seat 102 is generally bowl-shaped or having a generally cylindrical configuration. The seat inner chamber 112 is sized and configured so as to receive at least a portion of the disc guide 104 therein. The disc guide 104, as illustrated, is generally cylindrical in configuration and sized and configured so as to be received into and out of the inner chamber 112 of the seat 102. The disc guide 104 is slidably movable relative to the seat 102 so as to cooperate with the seat 102 in opening and closing fluid flow between the inlet 14 and outlet 16 of the main or control valve 10. As the disc guide 104 is moved into the seat 102, fluid flow is increasingly diminished. However, as the disc guide 104 is retracted from the seat 102, into an open position, fluid flow is increased therethrough. The seat 102 includes an upper peripheral rim portion 116 which is engageable with a sealing lip 118 of the disc guide 104, such that when the disc guide 104 is fully inserted into the seat 102 fluid flow through the valve 10 is closed off.
The seat 102 and the disc guide 104 have been designed so as to operate at high differential pressure conditions without experiencing cavitation damage to critical components of the valve 10. Sealing areas in and around the seat 102, and particularly the outlet of the seat, are protected from damaging cavitation conditions as the pressure drops in this critical area are low due to the configuration of the seat geometry. Features of the seat have been designed to reduce the pressure drop in stages so the pressure drop in the critical area of the seat outlet is kept to a minimum.
With reference again to
Moreover, the apertures 122 are formed at a non-normal angle through the wall 120, such as forming an acute angle through the wall, as illustrated in
Typically, there are a greater number of disc guide apertures 122 as seat apertures 114. Preferably, there are twice as many disc guide apertures 122 as seat apertures 114. The disc guide apertures 122 may be of a generally consistent width so as to have a generally consistent fluid flow therethrough. The cumulative fluid flow area of the disc guide apertures 122 may be approximately equivalent to the total cumulative fluid flow area of the seat apertures 114, however.
As mentioned above, the disc guide wall 120 has a lower portion 124 which is non-apertured. As the disc guide 104 is moved into the closed position, increasingly being disposed within the seat 102, the lower portion 124 of the disc guide wall 120 increasingly occludes the seat apertures 114, and thus the fluid flow through the assembly 100.
The seat apertures 114 are arranged such so as to direct fluid entering therethrough to converge in the seat inner chamber 112. The seat apertures 114 have a varying open width along a length thereof, such that as the disc guide 104 is raised or lowered, and the degree of occlusion or blockage by the lower portion 124 of the wall 120 of the disc guide 104 is varied, a varying flow area through the seat apertures 114 is created. As illustrated, the seat flow apertures 114 have geometrically-shaped aperture openings which increasingly narrow from the top thereof to the bottom thereof. Thus, the seat apertures 114 are geometrically configured to have a larger opening width at a top portion thereof and a smaller opening width at a lower portion thereof.
With reference now to
With reference now to
With reference now to
Thus, as the valve opens further flow area through the combined opening of the lower tip 114a and at least a portion of the lower portion area 114b, defined by the vertical slot shape as illustrated in
At valve positions between 25% and 80% open, as illustrated in
Even though the ratio of flow areas between the seat aperture openings 114 and the disc guide apertures 122 is gradually becoming equal, a higher pressure drop through the seat aperture openings of areas 114a, 114b and 114c are still achieved because of a combination of variables. At the valve positions between 25% and 80% open, as illustrated in
With reference to
The seat 102 may also include a deflector 128 within the inner seat chamber 112 and in spaced relation to the seat apertures 114. The deflector 128 typically extends from the base 110 and into the seat 102, such as to be concentric with the outer wall 108 of the seat 102. The deflector 128 is comprised of a wall having a height which is lower than the wall 108 of the seat 102. The space 130 between the seat apertures 114 and the outer wall surface 132 of the deflector 128 forms a fluid passageway and is sufficiently large such that the lower portion 124 of the disc guide wall 120 may be inserted therein, as illustrated in
The deflector 128, such as the outer wall surface 132, may be tapered, such as being slightly tapered inwardly, as illustrated, so that as the valve opens, more flow area is exposed between the deflector 128 and the lower portion 124 of the disc guide wall. An upper rim or edge 134 of the deflector 128 may have a non-planar or irregular geometry or configuration, such as the illustrated scallop profile. The deflector 128, and its irregular rim, increase the tortuous fluid path for the fluid passing thereover, which in turn increases the pressure drop occurring between the seat fluid inlet apertures 114 and the inner seat chamber 112. This arrangement and method of restricting and deflecting fluid flow through the seat 102 creates a greater pressure drop in the seat chamber 112, which is away from critical sealing surfaces and pressure boundary components of the valve 10.
The shape of the seat fluid inlet apertures 114 and their positional relationship with the inner deflector 128, as well as the position of the disc guide 104, and particularly the lower solid portion 124 of the disc guide 104 creates a restricted tortuous fluid path when the disc guide portion of the valve is operating close to the seat 102, such as illustrated in
As shown in
With reference to
The additional valve travel created by the disc guide 104 and the chamfer detail of the lip 118 allows for a smoother transition to low-flow demand changes when the disc guide 104 is operating out or near the seat 102, typically with the valve assembly being 0%-15% open. The aforementioned geometry profile is also believed to be beneficial in reducing the potential for cavitation damage when the valve is operating in the same positions near the valve seat 102. The restricted open geometry creates an additional pressure drop stage through the anti-cavitation features of the seat 102 and disc guide 104. Staged pressure drops are achieved through the seat apertures 114, through the deflector 128, through the disc guide slots 122 and finally through the low-flow chamfered profile of the disc guide lip 118.
The additional pressure drop stage is especially important when the valve is operating near the closed position, as described above. In this case, as the valve tends to open, with the disc guide 104 moving away from the seat 102 with increasing demand changes means the exit flow area is greater across the valve sealing surface between the lip 118 and sealing surface 116 of the seat 102. The greater exit area, created by the chamfered profile results in a smaller pressure drop in this region which reduces or eliminates the possibility of cavitation creation and/or cavitation damage to critical sealing surfaces of the seat 102. Moreover, the anti-cavitation valve assembly 100 as a whole is capable of operating at total pressure drop conditions greater than similar anti-cavitation valve products currently used in the waterworks industry.
To allow for an increased flow capacity when the valve is operating at or near full open positions, such as valve positions greater than 60% open, an internal boss 138 may be located in the base of the seat 110, such as generally in the center of the seat 102. The boss 138 extends upwardly through the base 110 of the seat 102 and accepts the stem 20 associated with the disc guide 104 within fluid passageway 140 that extends through the boss 138. The boss 138 is configured to vary fluid flow therethrough and into the seat inner chamber 112 as the stem 120 is moved along a length of the boss 138. At disc guide 104 positions less than 60% open, flow through the boss passageway 140 is blocked, as illustrated in
Fluid passing through this center hole passageway 140 mingles or collides with fluid flow passing through the seat apertures 114, which creates a turbulent flow condition in the inner seat chamber 112. This turbulent flow activity causes a larger pressure drop between the inlets of the seat 102 and inner seat chamber 112, and any resultant cavitation conditions are harmlessly dissipated within the inner seat chamber 112, away from critical seat sealing surfaces and pressure boundary components.
Incorporation of the boss 138 and central fluid passageway 140 also allows for an increased total flow area and valve capacity is slightly increased when flow is allowed to pass through the opening 140. Typically, additional flow demand conditions occur at valve positions greater than 80% open. The length of the stem 20, or the height of the boss 138, can be adjusted so flow through the passageway 140 can occur at other valve positions, such as 50% open, or less or greater. Whether or not these alternate opening conditions are needed depends on the pressure and flow conditions encountered in a particular application and the stem 20 and/or boss 138 can be configured accordingly.
With reference to
With reference to
Fluid flow activity through the boss passageway 138 assists, by disruptive flow activity, in causing a larger pressure drop between the valve inlet and the inner seat chamber 112. When the valve opening in greater than 50% open, the flow deflector 128 is less effective in disrupting flow into the inner seat chamber 112. Moreover, the lower portion 124 of the disc guide wall 120 is typically not in the direct flow path of the deflector 128 when the valve is greater than 25% open, which means its impact on disrupting or creating a tortuous flow path becomes less and less effective as the valve continues to open further. This diminished flow disruption condition of the deflector 128 is offset by the disruptive flow condition caused by the flow activity through the passageway 138 of the boss 140. Thus, throughout the full valve stroke, both the deflector 128 and the boss passageway 138 contribute to minimizing or eliminating potential damaging cavitation to critical sealing surfaces because extreme cavitation conditions occur in the inner seat chamber 112 where it harmlessly dissipates. Pressure drop through the disc guide apertures 122 and other exit flow areas is considerably lower meaning there is less likelihood for the occurrence of damaging cavitation to occur in these critical areas.
Thus, there are several variables and designs and configurations of the assembly 100 of the present invention which causes the majority of the pressure drop to occur between fluid flowing into the seat 102 and into the inner seat chamber 112, resulting in a smaller pressure drop through the fluid exiting through the disc guide apertures 122. Such includes seat aperture flow areas that are smaller in flow area than the disc guide slots, flow into the inner seat chamber 112 impinging on flow from opposing seat aperture openings 114, the converging of flows into the center of the seat chamber area creating additional pressure drop. The deflector 128 also redirects upwardly and creates a turbulent flow condition as it mixes with other fluid streams and converges in the inner seat chamber area 112. The scallop profile, or other irregular rim surface, on the defector 128 also contributes to the turbulent flow conditions as the fluid passes into the inner seat chamber 112. At a given percentage open condition, such as 60% and greater openings, fluid is allowed to flow through the seat boss fluid passageway 140, disrupting flow into the inner chamber 112 by converging and mingling with flow entering through the seat apertures 114. Fluid flowing through the seat 102 in such a manner results in all extreme cavitation conditions occurring within the seat 102, and in areas, such as the inner seat chamber 112 which are unaffected by extreme cavitation conditions.
Even when the disc guide 104 is fully opened or nearly fully opened, such as being between 80% and 100% open such that the lower portion 124 of the disc guide wall 120 is within the top portion 114d of the seat aperture 114 or not occluding the seat whatsoever, the pressure drop into the inner seat chamber 112 is still somewhat higher than the pressure drop through the disc guide apertures 122. Even though the ratio of combined flow area is between the seat apertures 114 and the disc guide apertures 122 is approximately equal, the turbulent flow conditions caused by the deflector 128 create higher pressure drops into the inner seat chamber 112 and with the smallest pressure drops through the disc guide apertures 122. Additional turbulent flow conditions are caused by fluid entering through the boss fluid passageway 140 when the valve position is sufficiently open, such as 60% open or greater, such that the stem is partially or fully removed from the boss 138. By having equal flow areas for the seat apertures 114 and disc guide apertures 122 and an additional flow area through the seat center hole boss 138, the valve assembly 100 is able to achieve flow capacities equal to valves with standard cavitation trim yet damaging cavitation to critical areas is less likely when the valve is greater than 80% open as any potential cavitation conditions typically occur away from these areas as the valve approaches the full open position.
The representative pressure drops through each orifice 1-3 of
Using these results, a 100 psi pressure drop is calculated for the 0.70 inch diameter first and second orifices or areas, and a 24 psi pressure drop for the 1.0 inch diameter orifice or slot 124.
If, from the above example, a 300 psi starting inlet pressure will drop to 100 psi at the inner seat chamber area 112. Then pressure from the inner seat chamber area will drop from 100 psi to 76 psi at the exit flow area through the exit slots 122. So, in this analogous stage pressure drop example, the majority of the pressure drop occurs through the seat inlet apertures 114 and through the seat deflector 128, and the lowest pressure drop occurs through the disc guide apertures 122, which is the purpose of the design so as to avoid damaging cavitation at the outlets 122. Computer flow design software can be used to demonstrate the stage pressure drop characteristics of this design, including how modifying the geometrically shaped seat flow apertures 114 and geometry and shape of the inner deflector 128 improves or changes the anti-cavitation characteristics of the valve.
Although several embodiments have been described in detail for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited, except as by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/088,678, filed on Oct. 7, 2020.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1307986 | Randall et al. | Jun 1919 | A |
1383005 | Mertens | Jun 1921 | A |
1570907 | Neal | Jan 1926 | A |
3117590 | Nelson et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
3157200 | Rowan | Nov 1964 | A |
3330294 | Manning | Jul 1967 | A |
3540484 | Brown | Nov 1970 | A |
3693659 | Parola | Sep 1972 | A |
3722854 | Parola | Mar 1973 | A |
3776278 | Allen | Dec 1973 | A |
3802537 | White | Apr 1974 | A |
3813079 | Baumann et al. | May 1974 | A |
3917221 | Kubota et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3954124 | Self | May 1976 | A |
3990475 | Myers | Nov 1976 | A |
4022423 | O'Connor et al. | May 1977 | A |
4024891 | Engel et al. | May 1977 | A |
4180100 | Kolb et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4249574 | Schnall et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4375821 | Nanao | Mar 1983 | A |
4384592 | Ng | May 1983 | A |
4397331 | Medlar | Aug 1983 | A |
4473210 | Brighton | Sep 1984 | A |
4567915 | Bates et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4617963 | Stares | Oct 1986 | A |
4650155 | Liantonio | Mar 1987 | A |
4679592 | Lamb | Jul 1987 | A |
4693450 | Paetzel | Sep 1987 | A |
4825906 | Hartman | May 1989 | A |
4860993 | Goode | Aug 1989 | A |
4921014 | Tartaglia et al. | May 1990 | A |
5018703 | Goode | May 1991 | A |
5769123 | Heestand et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5964248 | Enarson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6394134 | Kwon | May 2002 | B1 |
6935371 | Stares | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7073532 | Bowe | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7152628 | Folk et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
9010371 | Folk et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9759348 | Adams et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20060207666 | Micheel | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070240774 | McCarty | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20130025723 | Dutrop | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20150108379 | Juhnke | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20170102076 | Reynolds | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20190353265 | Gabriel | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220107027 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63088678 | Oct 2020 | US |