a. Field of Invention
The invention relates generally to vehicle door latches and related components, and, more particularly, to an anti-chucking striker for providing resistance to chucking in a plurality of directions.
b. Description of Related Art
As is known in the art, vehicle side doors are susceptible to movement when the vehicle is riding over rough surfaces. This movement can result in noise, referred to as chucking, from the latch area. As readily evident to those skilled in the art, this noise would be objectionable from a design and customer satisfaction viewpoint.
Previous solutions have tried to utilize the striker itself to provide resistance to chucking in the vertical direction while a rubber wedge can provide resistance to chucking in the horizontal direction. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,024,389 to Arabia, Jr. discloses a vehicle door latch with stiffness adjustment. As shown in FIG. 2, Arabia, Jr. discloses a door latch with an overslam bumper including an elastomeric portion for engaging the striker, located at the rearward end. Elastomeric bumper 25 is L-shaped and fits into slot 27, with bumper 25 nearly extending the width of fishmouth slot 74 with one end near back plate 16 and the other near fork bolt 30. Bumper 25 is preloaded by a stiffness adjustment mechanism which includes an expandable bushing 22, a nut 23 and an adjustment screw 122.
While bumper 25 of Arabia, Jr. biases the striker in a predetermined position, it is nevertheless complex in design and operation based on its operation in conjunction with expandable bushing 22, nut 23 and adjustment screw 122. Moreover, bumper 25 also serves the limited purpose of biasing the striker, and no other apparent operational benefits.
Yet further, U.S. Pat. No. 7,188,872 to Kalargeros as illustrated in FIG. 1 thereof, discloses a latch mechanism including latch bolt 12 with overmold 18 composed of elastomeric material, defining first, second and third buffers, 20, 22, and 24 respectively. Third buffer 24 hits impact surface 38 of pawl 13 and displaces it. The noise of the impact between third buffer 24 and surface 38 is reduced due to elastomeric overmold 18.
Thus whereas Kalargeros discloses an overmold 18 for reducing impact noise, it does not address chucking related movement or noise from the latch area.
Accordingly, there remains a need for an anti-chucking device for providing resistance to chucking in a plurality of direction. There also remains a need for an anti-chucking device which is usable with existing latch/striker designs, and which is economical to manufacture, install and service.
The invention solves the problems and overcomes the drawbacks and deficiencies of prior art anti-chucking devices by providing a vehicle including an anti-chucking striker overmold for minimizing chucking of a vehicle door having a latch therein. The anti-chucking striker overmold may include a striker mount connected to a striker and including at least one wedge including a first portion contiguously engageable with a latch frameplate opening to minimize movement of the vehicle door relative to the striker in a first direction.
For the anti-chucking striker overmold described above, the wedge may include upper and lower wedges contiguously engageable with respective upper and lower portions of the latch frameplate opening. The first direction may be generally a vertical direction along a vehicle door pillar. A shield may be mounted to or formed with the striker mount, with the shield being sized to substantially cover a fishmouth opening of the latch to prevent air and dust intrusion into the latch when a catch of the latch is engaged with the striker. The wedge may include a second portion formed line-to-line with the fishmouth opening of the latch to minimize movement of the vehicle door in a second direction. The second portion may extend from the first portion, and the second direction may be generally orthogonal to the first direction. The wedge may be dimensioned to avoid interference with operation of a catch of the latch. The anti-chucking striker overmold may be insert molded onto the striker.
The invention also provides an anti-chucking striker overmold for minimizing chucking of a vehicle door having a latch therein. The anti-chucking striker overmold may include a striker mount connectable to a striker and including at least one wedge including a first portion contiguously engageable with a latch frameplate opening to minimize movement of the vehicle door relative to the striker in a first direction.
For the anti-chucking striker overmold described above, the wedge may include upper and lower wedges contiguously engageable with respective upper and lower portions of the latch frameplate opening. The first direction may be generally a vertical direction along a vehicle door pillar. A shield may be mounted to or formed with the striker mount, with the shield being sized to substantially cover a fishmouth opening of the latch to prevent air and dust intrusion into the latch when a catch of the latch is engaged with the striker. The wedge may include a second portion formed line-to-line with the fishmouth opening of the latch to minimize movement of the vehicle door in a second direction. The second portion may extend from the first portion, and the second direction may be generally orthogonal to the first direction. The wedge may be dimensioned to avoid interference with operation of a catch of the latch. The anti-chucking striker overmold may be insert molded onto the striker.
Additional features, advantages, and embodiments of the invention may be set forth or apparent from consideration of the following detailed description, drawings, and claims. Moreover, it is to be understood that both the foregoing summary of the invention and the following detailed description are exemplary and intended to provide further explanation without limiting the scope of the invention as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention and together with the detail description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views,
Specifically, referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring next to
Referring to
The operation of anti-chucking striker overmold 10 will now be described in detail with reference to
Specifically, as shown in
To summarize, anti-chucking striker overmold 10 thus provides an anti-chucking device which provides resistance to chucking in a plurality of direction (i.e. z-axis direction for
Those skilled in the art would readily appreciate in view of this disclosure that a variety of modifications may be made to anti-chucking striker overmold 10 without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, concave extensions 32, 34 of wedges 18, which contact fishmouth 36 of the latch may be shaped as needed for contacting fishmouth 36. Further, instead of anti-chucking striker overmold 10 being insert molded onto striker 16, striker overmold 10 may be snap-fitted onto striker 16 or otherwise attached to striker 16 by an adhesive or other mechanical engagement.
Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those particular embodiments, and that various changes and modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4883298 | Kleefeldt | Nov 1989 | A |
4981313 | Makamura | Jan 1991 | A |
5348357 | Konchan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5927774 | Granger | Jul 1999 | A |
6024389 | Arabia, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042160 | Hamada et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6073980 | Arabia, Jr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6155618 | Ichinose | Dec 2000 | A |
6672634 | Burton | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6883842 | Paskonis | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7014258 | Schubring et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7121616 | Cooley | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7188872 | Kalargeros et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7308731 | Schubring et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7631909 | Snyder et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7828348 | Bolbocianu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20060097550 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060200939 | Schubring et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070001468 | Burton | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070114802 | Johnson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070241570 | Paskonis | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090212579 | Hemingway et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100283271 | Hemingway et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110025078 | Gentile et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110025079 | Paskonis | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090295196 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |