Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an anti-climbing protection apparatus for a rail vehicle comprising at least one buffer which is supported by an energy absorption element connected to a vehicle frame of the rail vehicle.
An anti-climbing protection apparatus of this type is described in the German patent specification DE 10 2008 048 247 B3. The known anti-climbing protection apparatus has support elements extending in a longitudinal direction of a rail vehicle that is formed by a locomotive, said support elements being interconnected via a transverse support. The support elements are so arranged above the buffers on the locomotive frame or chassis as to be displaceable via guides, and extend as far as an end region of an elastic path of the buffer plates of the buffers. Thrust bearings, against which a solid structure of a colliding rail vehicle comes to bear in the event of a crash, are provided at the end of the support elements. The known anti-climbing protection apparatus requires a special construction of a rail vehicle or locomotive, and is therefore not suitable for retrofitting.
The European patent specification EP 2 033 868 B1 also discloses an anti-climbing protection apparatus in the form of a so-called buffer anti-climbing protection device, in which a funnel-shaped shell of rigid material is provided for each of the two buffers at the ends of a rail vehicle, and is so fastened to the vehicle frame as to overhang the respective buffer. The known buffer anti-climbing protection device preferably has two shell sections, these being formed as protruding catches. In the event of a crash, the buffer of an oncoming vehicle goes into the funnel-shaped shell, thereby preventing the buffer from overriding. If two rail vehicles having identically protected buffers collide, it cannot be excluded that one of the two shells, by virtue of its shape, could necessarily cause a degree of climbing and hence derailment of one or both rail vehicles.
The unexamined German patent application DE 10 2006 050 028 A1 also discloses an anti-climbing protection apparatus for rail vehicles, in which the rail vehicles have projecting shaped parts at the front of the vehicle. In the event of two rail vehicles colliding, these produce a positive engagement between the vehicle fronts impacting each other. A matrix of cells made from flat plates is provided at the front of each vehicle in this case, said cells being open in the direction of travel, wherein the intersection points thereof have greater rigidity in a longitudinal direction and the webs thereof have less rigidity in a longitudinal direction. When a collision occurs, the vehicle front of one of the rail vehicles penetrates the vehicle front of the other rail vehicle, resulting in interlocking in both vertical and horizontal directions. This anti-climbing protection apparatus does not function if the colliding vehicles are equipped with dissimilar anti-climbing protection apparatus, and therefore cannot be used in the context of interoperable transport.
The object of the invention is to specify an anti-climbing protection apparatus of the type cited in the introduction, wherein said anti-climbing protection apparatus can be produced economically, reliably prevents overriding and can easily be retrofitted.
In order to achieve this object, as part of an anti-climbing protection apparatus of the type cited above, a bearing element is inventively fastened to that end of the energy absorption element which faces away from the vehicle frame, wherein said bearing element supports an anti-climbing protection device at its end which projects in a vertical direction from the buffer, and a horizontally aligned stop is provided in such a way that an anti-climbing protection element of the anti-climbing protection device, interacting with the vehicle front of the rail vehicle in the event of a crash, can be moved by said stop into an anti-climbing protection position which extends over the buffer element.
An important advantage of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus is that it is relatively economical to produce because it consists essentially of only the bearing element with the anti-climbing protection device and the stop, and its main parts can therefore be preproduced in series; installation into the rail vehicle is relatively easy to manage. A further advantage of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus is that it can easily be retrofitted to rail vehicles because the attachment of the bearing element with the anti-climbing protection device can be effected at the free end of the energy absorption element and the fastening of the stop can be effected at the vehicle frame. Consequently, no significant intervention is required in the rail vehicle or the front thereof.
With regard to the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus, the stop can be arranged in various ways. It may be advantageous to fasten the stop in the region of the vehicle front of the rail vehicle. This does not require any expensive supplementary work on the rail vehicle because the stop can readily be attached to the vehicle front.
However, it is also possible to fasten the stop to the anti-climbing protection element. In this case, the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus including the stop can be entirely preproduced, and it is merely necessary to ensure that a suitably mechanically stable region is provided for the stop on the rail vehicle or its vehicle frame.
Concerning the attachment of the stop and the anti-climbing protection device in relation to the energy absorption element or the buffer of the rail vehicle, various possibilities exist. In order to prevent the opposing vehicle from overriding in the event of a collision, the stop and the anti-climbing protection device are arranged above the energy absorption element.
In order to prevent the local vehicle from overriding in the event of a collision, the stop and the anti-climbing protection device are arranged below the energy absorption element.
In order to prevent the opposing vehicle and the local vehicle from overriding in the event of a collision, the anti-climbing protection entities are arranged both above and below the energy absorption element.
With regard to the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus, the anti-climbing protection element can be designed in different ways. In an embodiment which is considered advantageous, the anti-climbing protection element is a slider which is so held in a guide of the anti-climbing protection device as to be horizontally displaceable and which, at its end facing the stop, projects from the guide. This embodiment of the anti-climbing protection element is considered to be advantageous due to its functional safety and comparative ease of implementation.
In order to increase the reliability of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus, the slider can be arrested in the initial operating position in order to prevent unwanted slipping, e.g. by means of a break-off connection between the slider and the guide. Only if the stop exerts a horizontal force on the slider, as normally occurs in the event of a crash, does the break-off connection break and the slider can be moved by means of the stop into the anti-climbing protection position. Unwanted slipping of the slider during normal operation is prevented by the break-off connection.
A further functional improvement can be achieved by equipping the slider of the anti-climbing protection device with an additional horizontal rib at its end which faces away from the stop. As a result of this, the local vehicle can also “interlock” with a correspondingly embodied vehicle front of the opposing vehicle in the event of a collision.
In order to increase the reliability of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus by locking the anti-climbing protection element in the anti-climbing protection position in the event of a crash, in an advantageous embodiment, the anti-climbing protection element is a slider element which is connected in a longitudinally offset manner via a rated break point to a slider part that faces the stop, and the slider part is connected via a further rated break point to the guide, wherein the one rated break point between the slider part and the slider element is stronger than the further rated break point between the slider part and the guide. It is thereby ensured that overriding is prevented in the event of a crash, while unwanted slipping is prevented in the initial operating position during normal operation.
Concerning the embodiment of the slider element and the slider part, various possibilities exist. It is considered advantageous, for example, for the slider element and the slider part to be so designed as to have a constant thickness over their length in each case. This embodiment has the advantage that, in addition to the above cited safety, ease of manufacture is assured for the slider element and the slider part.
As an alternative to the embodiment described above, provision can be made for the slider part to widen in the shape of a wedge towards the stop, and for the slider element to have a reverse widening. In this case, the slider element and the slider part interact to form a wedge-shaped connection, by means of which positive fixing in the guide is effected as soon as the anti-climbing protection position is reached. By virtue of said fixing, the slider element is secured in the anti-climbing protection position against displacement due to any possible horizontal force effects caused by a collision.
Irrespective whether the anti-climbing protection element is a slider or a slider part, it is considered advantageous for the slider or the slider element of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus to be equipped with a catch at its end which faces away from the stop.
In a further embodiment variant of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus, the anti-climbing protection device is designed as a pivoting bracket which is pivotably mounted via one of its bracket arms on a rocker joint of the bearing element, said rocker joint being situated below the energy absorption element, and is embodied at that end of the bearing element which is situated above the energy absorption element in such a way that its other bracket arm can be pivoted and locked into the anti-climbing protection position by means of the stop on the rail vehicle in the event of a crash. It is considered a significant advantage of this embodiment variant that it reliably prevents overriding and is easy to retrofit.
The invention is further explained in the drawings, in which:
If the rail vehicle having the vehicle frame 1 and the buffer 10 are pressed against the buffer 11 of the opposing vehicle in the event of a crash, as illustrated in
In the case of the exemplary embodiment of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus according to
The operation of this anti-climbing protection device otherwise corresponds exactly to that explained in detail with reference to
This applies likewise to the exemplary embodiment according to
The exemplary embodiment according to
The exemplary embodiment of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus illustrated in various states in
The anti-climbing protection device 40 here has an anti-climbing protection element in the form of a slider element 45 which is guided in a guide 46. As shown in the magnified illustration of the anti-climbing protection device 40 according to
If a crash with an opposing vehicle having a buffer 52 as shown in
During the further course of the supposed crash (see
During the further course of a supposed crash, the stop 50 is deformed in a plastic manner or broken. The slider element 45 with its catch 55 prevents overriding of the opposing vehicle, and is secured in the guide 46 against backward displacement due to any possible horizontal force effects caused by the collision.
The exemplary embodiment of the inventive anti-climbing protection apparatus shown in
If a crash occurs, an energy absorption element 67 is compressed and the stop 61 is pressed against the slider part 63 in this case. The rated break point 64 is severed first in this case, because it is weaker than the further rated break point 62. The slider element 60 with its catch 69 is pushed as far as the stop 70, and slides over a buffer 68 of an opposing vehicle which is not illustrated further (see in particular
It can be seen from
In this case,
As shown in
The anti-climbing protection apparatus shown in
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/052634 | 2/11/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/120882 | 8/20/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8783479 | Ewerding | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20080236440 | Nakamura | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080314282 | Malfent | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000506 | Jaede | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100218701 | Graf | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120325108 | Graf | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130126458 | Ewerding | May 2013 | A1 |
20130233200 | Taguchi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20160023672 | Koerner | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160214629 | Drexler | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160318528 | Westman | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160347333 | Lenzi | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101553390 | Oct 2009 | CN |
102464002 | May 2012 | CN |
3228942 | Feb 1984 | DE |
20118262 | Mar 2003 | DE |
102006050028 | Apr 2008 | DE |
102008048244 | Sep 2009 | DE |
102008048247 | Sep 2009 | DE |
0952062 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2033868 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2594452 | May 2013 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170174234 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |