The present invention relates to connectors, and, more particularly, to a device that prevents a spin coupling from loosening.
It is common practice to use a two-part connector to join electrical conductors. In such connectors, a first group of electrical conductors terminate in one of the connector “halves” and a second group of electrical conductors terminate in the other of the connector halves. To establish electrical connection between the two groups of electrical conductors, the two connector halves are joined.
The two halves of the connector are typically held together by a nut, typically referred to as a “spin coupling,” a “coupling nut,” or a “locking ring.” The spin coupling is usually permanently attached to one of the connector halves at the time of initial assembly. In some embodiments, the spin coupling is internally threaded and is rotated to engage mating threads on the other connector half.
The spin coupling is the primary means of maintaining the integrity of the mechanical and electrical interfaces of the two-part connector. As a consequence, after the two connector halves are joined, it is very important that the spin coupling does not rotate in such a way as to loosen. Inadvertent rotation can result, for example, from shock, vibration, G-loading, etc.
Many anti-decoupling mechanisms have been proposed to prevent inadvertent rotation of a connector spin coupling. But few if any of these mechanisms can be used to retrofit standard connectors. Rather, in most cases, the mechanisms are an integral part of what is effectively a new connector design. In the few cases that the mechanisms can be used to retrofit a standard connector, the retrofit requires modifying the standard connector, such as by machining it, to add notches, holes, and the like.
The ability to retrofit a standard connector with an anti-decoupling device without modifying the connector would be very beneficial.
The present invention provides a way to prevent a spin coupling from loosening without some of the costs and disadvantages of the prior art.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, an anti-decoupling device is used to prevent undesired rotation of a spin coupling of, for example, a two-part electrical connector. Among other benefits of the anti-decoupling device disclosed herein, it can be used to retrofit existing connectors without having to modify the connector. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the anti-decoupling device is able to retrofit an in-field connector without having to disassemble the connector.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, the anti-decoupling device comprises a base and two prongs that extend in a generally axial (as opposed to radial) direction relative to the base.
In use, the base of the anti-decoupling device couples to a fitting (e.g., a hex nut, etc.) that attaches one half of the electrical connector to, for example, a bulkhead, an electrical box, etc. The base has a large, centrally-located opening (i.e., like a washer). In use, one of the connector portions is received by this opening.
The prongs of the anti-decoupling device are diametrically opposed to one another on the base. The prongs extend sufficiently far in the axial direction so that the free end of each prong aligns with the spin coupling (when the spin coupling is in a locking positioning for joining the two connector halves).
In the illustrative embodiment, each prong is partially folded about its longitudinal midline, thereby forming a “v,” at least proximal to the free end thereof. Due to this fold along the longitudinal midline, the side edges (hereinafter “blades”) of each prong extend in the radial (as opposed to longitudinal) direction, toward the knurled edge of the spin coupling. The knurling (i.e., a series of successive ridges and channels) facilitates manual tightening of the spin coupling.
The prongs are appropriately distanced from the spin coupling so that contact between the channels of the spin coupling and the blades results in an “outward-” directed force on the free-end of the prongs. That is, the force urges the free-end of the prongs away from the spin coupling. Since the prongs are rigidly attached to the base, this outward force effectively spring loads the cantilevered prongs so that the v-shaped free-end of each prong is biased toward the spin coupling.
Due to the v-shape of the prongs, the two blades on each prong extend in different directions. That is, relative to a line that bisects the “v,” one blade extends toward the “left” and the other blade extends toward the “right.” The blade that extends to the left will tend to prevent inadvertent rotation of the spin coupling in the counter-clockwise direction and the prong that extends to the right will tend to prevent inadvertent rotation in clockwise direction. Yet, the spin coupling can be manually forced, such that it does not have to be removed to decouple the connector.
In this manner, and unlike most prior-art anti-decoupling devices, the present anti-decoupling device interfaces with the exterior of conventional connectors and with existing features thereof (i.e., the knurled edge of the spin coupling). And by virtue of a “clip-on” or “screw-on” functionality of the base, the anti-decoupling devices disclosed herein are able to retrofit virtually any two-part connector.
The utility of the present anti-decoupling devices for retrofitting existing connectors is manifest. In some further embodiments, the present invention provides an improved connector that includes the present anti-decoupling device. In other words, an aspect of the present invention is a new two-part connector that incorporates, at the time of manufacture, an anti-decoupling device as disclosed herein.
As depicted in
Male connector portion 120 of connector 100 includes body 122, screw threads 124, contact pins 126, electrical conductors 128, and hex mount 130, interrelated as shown. Pins 126 are electrically connected to conductors 128.
To electrically connect electrical conductors 128 to electrical conductors 111, female connector portion 102 and male connector portion 120 are pushed together into mating engagement. In this state, pins 126 are received by the sockets within body 104 of female connector portion 102. It will be understood that the association of some of the features with one or the other of the “female” connector or the “male” connector is somewhat arbitrary and interchangeable.
It is imperative that, once connected, male connector portion 120 and female connector portion 102 do not disengage or otherwise loosen to the point that the integrity of the electrical coupling between the two sets of conductors is threatened. To that end, spin coupling 112, which is internally threaded, is “screwed” onto threads 124 of male connector portion 120. Spin coupling 112 includes knurled edge 114. The “knurls” comprise alternating “ridges” and “channels” that facilitate manually tightening spin coupling 112. The mated connector appears in
Experience has shown that vibration, shock, G-forces, and other physical disturbances are capable of loosening spin coupling 112. Consequently, it is advisable to provide two-part connectors that incorporate a spin coupling with an anti-decoupling device.
Base 232A includes a physical adaptation that enables it to couple to a connector. In the illustrative embodiment, this physical adaptation is clip 234. The clip enables anti-decoupling device 230A to couple to any feature that has substantially flat sides, such as a hex nut, a square or rectangular flange, etc. In the illustrative embodiment, base 232A includes two clips 234 that are diametrically opposed to one another about base 232A.
Base 232A also incorporates large central opening 236. This opening accommodates the body of the connector (half) to which anti-decoupling device 230A will be attached (see, e.g.,
As depicted in
In the illustrative embodiment, prongs 238 are diametrically opposed to one another on base 232A. Each prong 238 extends a distance, D, in the axial direction that will position its free end 242 in alignment with the spin coupling of a joined and locked two-part part connector. This distance will vary for different connectors; as a consequence, distance D will be different for various versions of the present anti-decoupling device.
In the illustrative embodiment, each prong 238 is partially folded about its longitudinal midline 240, thereby bending the prong into the shape of a “v.” This fold creates blades 244A and 244B, which, due to the fold, extend in a lateral or radial direction toward the central axis A-A.
In either case, clips 234 are spread to engage hex mount 130, thereby securely coupling anti-decoupling device 230A to connector 100. Blades 244A and 244B of each prong 238 extends into the channels of knurled edge 114 of spin coupling 112.
Prongs 238 are appropriately distanced from spin coupling 112 so that contact between the channels of the spin coupling and edges 246A and 246B of blades 244A and 244B forces the free-end of the prongs outward (i.e., away from the spin coupling). Since prongs 238 are rigidly attached at their other end to base 232A, this outward force effectively spring loads the cantilevered prongs 238. As a consequence, when in contact with the channels, blades 244A and 244B are biased toward the spin coupling.
This effect is illustrated in
As depicted in
It is to be understood that the disclosure teaches just one example of the illustrative embodiment and that many variations of the invention can easily be devised by those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure and that the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
For example, it is to be understood that prongs 238 need not be “folded” as depicted in the illustrative embodiment. Rather, in some embodiments, two blades are attached (e.g., soldered, glued, etc.) to longitudinal members to form a “prong.”
In fact, the presence of a structure on anti-decoupling device 230A that is appropriately described as a “prong” is not necessary per se. What is important is to provide the functionality that is provided by the prongs of the illustrative embodiment.
Namely, to provide a means that engages the knurled edge of the spin coupling in such a way as to prevent the spin coupling from moving.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4441775 | Walters | Apr 1984 | A |
4534607 | Tomsa | Aug 1985 | A |
4808123 | Dee et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4834667 | Fowler et al. | May 1989 | A |
4863396 | Johnson | Sep 1989 | A |
5590228 | Gibola et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6086400 | Fowler | Jul 2000 | A |
6368134 | Richter | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6527575 | Scholler | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6966788 | Ruhl, Jr. | Nov 2005 | B1 |