The inventions described below relate to the field of anti-graffiti window film coverings.
Anti-graffiti window film laminate systems provide the benefit of easy and quick removal and replacement of film sheets without the hassle of replacing windows. Current anti-graffiti window film systems include a stepped edge in a corner that peels away one layer at a time. The existing peeling film systems make it difficult for a user to identify the remaining number of layers of film within the system from a distance. The user must examine the corner critically in order to identify the number of remaining layers in order to only remove the uppermost layer. The inability to view the number of remaining layers is often exacerbated by the fact that the installation of these disposable protective films occurs in dark environments such service shops. This contributes to the difficulty of viewing by the user and often results in inadvertent disposal of multiple viable layers. The result is often increased services times as films are replaced sooner than necessary as well as increased cost in inadvertent discarding of viable layers.
The devices and methods described below provide for anti-graffiti window film covering systems. The system includes a multi-layer polymeric film for placement on a vehicle window. Each film layer includes visual indicia to clearly identify the number of sheets remaining in the film layer system. Each disposable film layer includes a unique etched visual marking that is present only within the individual layer. The unique etched visual marking identifies the number of remaining layers to ensure that the user removes the desired layer and not more layers than required. The etched visual indicia provides for easy and accurate identification of the number of layers remaining to the user.
A method of making multiple ablations on a multi layer polymeric film is also provided. The method includes the steps of ablating each individual polymeric layer with a unique etch. All of the unique etches are visible when all of the polymeric sheets are staked on top of each other. However, each etch uniquely indicates the number of remaining layers for identification by the user.
The visual indicia etched into the laminate by any method such as laser ablation, blade cutting, heat pressing, or any other similar method. Laser ablation may be used to cut the visual indicia into the laminate. Each layer is ablated with a different visual indicia that indicates the number of layers remaining. The visual indicia of the laminate conveniently aids in selectively removing only the topmost remaining layer from the rest of the polymeric laminate via tool or by hand. A first pass is made by the laser to selectively ablate the first layer of the polymeric laminate with a first visual indicia. The first layer is the topmost layer or the layer that is most proximate the laser etching device. A second ablation is made to the second layer, positioned adjacent to the first layer. The second ablation is contained only on the second layer and is a different visual indicia than the ablation on the first layer. The third layer is disposed below the second layer. A third ablation is made to the third layer and is contained only on the third layer. The fourth layer is disposed below the third layer. A fourth ablation is made to the fourth layer and is also only contained on the forth layer. The fourth or bottom layer is applied to a substrate surface to protect it. For example, the system is adhered to a glass or plastic window. The topmost sheet is peeled away and discarded in order to reveal a new, undamaged sheet below. The system protects the windows from vandalism or other surface damage by adhering the stack of sheets to the substrate to be protected and subsequently pulling a topmost sheet away from the stack after it becomes damaged. The visual indicia are illustrated as hash tags or numbers. However, the visual indicia can be any form that identifies numbers of remaining layers to the user. For example, the indicia can be dots, numbers, various marks, or shapes. The indicia can also be different color or font etchings. The only limitation in the type of etching is that the etchings are different in each layer so that a user can distinguish the number of remaining layers based on some understood parameters. The system can contain any number of disposable layers according to user preference. The minimum number of layers must be two (one top most layer and a bottom layer). However, the total number of layers can exceed the 4 layers illustrated in the above systems.
While the preferred embodiments of the devices and methods have been described in reference to the environment in which they were developed, they are merely illustrative of the principles of the inventions. The elements of the various embodiments may be incorporated into each of the other species to obtain the benefits of those elements in combination with such other species, and the various beneficial features may be employed in embodiments alone or in combination with each other. Other embodiments and configurations may be devised without departing from the spirit of the inventions and the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4654101 | Kane | Mar 1987 | A |
5236752 | Dressier | Aug 1993 | A |
6491042 | Young | Dec 2002 | B1 |
8292347 | Drake | Oct 2012 | B1 |
20030003739 | Butschke | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022403 | Shimoda | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030154908 | Webber | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040063331 | Mori | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040102050 | Delamarche | May 2004 | A1 |
20040121105 | Janssen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040145813 | Wilson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050153483 | Groenhuis | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190322 | Okabe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060194037 | Fink | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070049031 | Kaifu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070212619 | Yoshikawa | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080274334 | Sekiya | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080280105 | Kloosterman | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090008142 | Shimizu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100195175 | Flynn | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120171869 | Morikawa | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120205785 | Bouet | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130126471 | Igarashi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130298942 | Ren | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150246575 | Green | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160023442 | Faris | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160225637 | Takahashi | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160308112 | Tan | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160322230 | Shimoda | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170021592 | Gittere | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170133206 | Tahara | May 2017 | A1 |
20180204716 | Takahashi | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190198321 | Kihara | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190214246 | Kihara | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228981 | Asada | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200131840 | Green | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200168468 | Ishii | May 2020 | A1 |
20200216758 | Kim | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3020339 | Dec 1980 | DE |
2849050 | Jun 2004 | FR |
95015 | Jun 2010 | RU |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion from IA No. PCT/US2019/053159 dated Jan. 16, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200131840 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |