The invention relates to an anti-lofting deflector for aircraft landing gear, and to landing gear fitted with such a deflector.
Some kinds of landing gear are fitted with deflectors to prevent stones or debris being thrown up or “lofted” by the tires while the aircraft is running on the ground.
Such deflectors are commonly mounted in particular on the nose landing gear of Russian fighters such as the MIG 23 or the MIG 29, where such landing gear has two wheels on a common axle. The deflectors are then in the form of a flap extending behind the tires of the landing gear and mounted to pivot about an axis that coincides with the axis of the axle, the deflector also being connected by a rod to a fixed point on the main strut of the landing gear. Thus, the greater the extent to which the shock absorber of the landing gear is pushed in (which corresponds to a large static load on the landing gear and thus to an increased risk of stones being lofted), the closer the flap of the deflector approaches the ground.
Nevertheless, clearance must necessarily be maintained between the ground and the bottom of the flap in order to prevent the flap from scraping the ground and being damaged, or indeed from preventing the aircraft from being movable rearwards (e.g. when pushed by a tractor). The need to take account of the potential of the tires being under-inflated has led to providing a large amount of clearance between the ground and the bottom of the flap, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the deflector.
An object of the invention is to provide an anti-lofting deflector for aircraft landing gear with improved effectiveness.
In order to achieve this object, the invention provides an anti-lofting deflector for landing gear having two wheels on an axle, the deflector comprising:
In a preferred embodiment, the return member comprises a spring coupled between the second flap and a stationary point of the support or of the landing gear, the spring extending along a line of action that passes between the hinge axes.
The invention can be better understood in the light of the following description of a particular, non-limiting embodiment of the deflector of the invention given with reference to the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which:
a and 3b are side views of the deflector fitted to the landing gear of
With reference to
As can be seen particularly in
The support 5 has an abutment 8 against which a stop member 9 (in this example a finger of adjustable length) that is secured to the frame 4 comes into contact in order to define an angular position in which the first flap 2 stops relative to the support 5 so that the first flap 2 cannot fold against the support 5. Likewise, the second flap 3 has an extension 10 that forms a stop member coming into contact against the back of the first flap 2, thereby forming an abutment defining an angular position in which the second flap 3 is stopped relative to the first flap 2, such that the second flap 3 cannot become aligned with the first flap 2.
A return member, specifically in this example a spring 11, is coupled between a stationary point 12 secured to the support 5 (it could be secured directly to the landing gear), and the end of a lever 13 secured to the frame 6 of the second flap 3. As can be seen in the figure, the line of action L of the spring passes between the hinge axes X1 and X2, such that the spring 11 serves simultaneously to urge the first flap 2 against the abutment 8 of the support 5 and to urge the extension 10 of the second flap 3 against the back of the first flap 2.
The operation of the deflector of the invention is shown in
Naturally, the invention is not limited to the above description, but covers any variant coming within the ambit defined by the claims. In particular, although the return member in this example comprises a spring coupled between the second flap and a stationary point of the support or the landing gear, in a variant it is possible to use a return member comprising two torsion springs arranged respectively between the support and the first flap, and between the first flap and the second flap, each of the torsion springs urging the first and second flaps towards their respective abutments.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11 57775 | Sep 2011 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/066206 | 8/20/2012 | WO | 00 | 3/26/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/030030 | 3/7/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3010682 | Moss et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
3670996 | Jenny | Jun 1972 | A |
3794383 | France et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3802739 | Knyszel et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
4408736 | Kirschbaum et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
8864176 | Lasser | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20090206199 | Jackson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010052447 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/EP2012/066206 dated Nov. 15, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140231584 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |