This section provides background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the disclosure. It should be understood that the statements in this section of this document are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Anti-ram vehicle barrier systems are used to guard against access to protected areas. In particular, the systems are provided to stop motor vehicles, such as trucks, from being intentionally driven into certain areas for nefarious purposes. At least one agency of the United States Government has provided standards to certify barriers for use.
An exemplary vehicle barrier includes a longitudinally extending beam positioned vertically above a ground level and separating a protected side from an attack side, the beam comprising beam sections, wherein adjacent beam sections are pivotally connected, and posts having a first end disposed below ground level and a second end attached to the beam. In some embodiments, the vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an ASTM F2656 designation capable of stopping a 15,000-pound vehicle impacting the beam when traveling in a direction from the attack side toward the protected side within a determined distance.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of claimed subject matter.
The disclosure is best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying figures. It is emphasized that, in accordance with standard practice in the industry, various features are not drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion.
It is to be understood that the following disclosure provides many different embodiments, or examples, for implementing different features of various embodiments. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. In addition, the disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed.
PVB 10 is configured to stop the penetration of a motor vehicle that crashes into the barrier. PVB 10 should fully stop any impacting vehicle within a desired penetration distance, for example, to keep explosives carried by the vehicle at a selected standoff distance from facilities located within the barrier perimeter. United States federal agencies (e.g., the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of State (DOS)) have developed test standards using crash tests to quantify, verify, and certify barrier performance. Such test methods were initially published by the U.S. Dept. of State in 1985 as SD-STD-02.01, which was revised in 2003 as SD-STD-02.01 Revision A, and which was replaced in 2009 with ASTM F2656 (Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers). Embodiments of PVB 10 are configured to be crash-rated by certifying agencies such as DOD, DOS, ASTM and British Standards (BSI). Vehicle barriers are tested by crashing a motor vehicle from a perpendicular direction into the barrier. The vehicle barrier is rated based on the test vehicles weight, the speed of impact, and the penetration of the vehicle (e.g., the cargo bed) beyond the pre-impact inside edge of the barrier. For example, a “K” or “M” designates a medium duty vehicle with a gross weight of 15,000 pounds (6810 kg). The speed ratings include K4/M30 for traveling at 28.0 to 37.9 miles per hour (mph), K8/M40 traveling at 38.0 to 46.9 mph, and K12/M50 traveling at 47.0 mph and above. The penetration ratings include P1 for less than or equal to 1 meter (3.3 ft.), P2 for 1.10 to 7 m (3.31 to 23.0 ft.), and P3 for 7.01 to 30 m (23.1 to 98.4 ft.). For example, an M50 P1 crash barrier is designed to stop a medium duty truck traveling 50 mph with a penetration distance of 3.3 feet or less.
In
PVB 10 includes a continuous beam 12 positioned above ground level 17. For example, beam 12 may be supported approximately three feet off of ground level 17. PVB 10 may include one or more truss sections 14. In the illustrated examples, truss sections 14 are illustrated at terminal ends of a longitudinal length of continuous beam 12, however, truss sections 14 may be positioned within a longitudinal span of continuous beam 12. Beam 12 is formed of interconnected beam sections 16. Adjacent beams sections 16 are connected at joints 18. Joints 18 are pivoting connections that permit a degree of pivoting movement between adjacent beam sections 16 or a beam section and a post when beam 12 is impacted by a motor vehicle. Examples of pivot connections at joints 18 are illustrated in
Posts, generally denoted by the numeral 22, are connected to beam 12, for example, to support beam 12 above ground level and to provide tension to mitigate lift of beam 12 in response to the impact of the motor vehicle. Posts 22 are metal members and may take various forms including I-beams, round or rectangular (e.g., square) members. Posts 22 may be arranged in a line post configuration, identified specifically with reference number 21, connected to beam 12 at a joint 18. Posts 22 may be arranged in an intermediate configuration, identified specifically with reference number 23, connected to beam 12 at an intermediate position in between joints 18. Some or all of posts 22 may be used to support an ornamental fence structure, e.g. a chain link section.
With reference, in particular to
Foundation 24 is concrete and may be a shallow or a deep foundation. A concrete foundation having a depth, for example, of about twenty inches or less, may be considered a shallow foundation. Concrete foundation 24 may be about eighteen inches or less. Concrete foundation 24 may be about twelve inches or less. Concrete foundation 24 may be about six inches or less. Concrete foundation 24 may extend the length of beam 12 as shown for example in
In this example, first end 40 is a rectangular shaped member extending horizontally relative to ground level and having a vertical hole 41 through which a tail end of pivot pin 32 is disposed, and a cross-hole 43 that may be aligned with a cross-hole 38 in pivot pin 32 (see,
In
Brace 20 may be connected to a line post 21. In the configuration of
A passive vehicle barrier according to at least one embodiment includes a plurality of interconnected beam sections, forming a beam positioned above ground level and secured to the ground via a plurality of spaced apart posts. Adjacent beam sections are pivotally connected to one another. In some embodiments, the passive vehicle barrier is an anti-ram barrier is configured to meet or meets ASTM F2656 standards. The posts may be positioned at pivotal connections between adjacent beam sections and/or positioned between pivotal connections.
In some embodiments, braces can be attached to the beam and the ground to form two sides of a triangle and provide a stopping force to a motor vehicle impacting the beam. One or more of the braces may be connected with a vertical post that forms a third side of the triangle.
The foregoing outlines features of several embodiments so that those skilled in the art may better understand the aspects of the disclosure. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they may readily use the disclosure as a basis for designing or modifying other processes and structures for carrying out the same purposes and/or achieving the same advantages of the embodiments introduced herein. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the disclosure and that they may make various changes, substitutions, and alterations herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. The scope of the invention should be determined only by the language of the claims that follow. The term “comprising” within the claims is intended to mean “including at least” such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open group. The terms “a,” “an” and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1222020 | Myers | Apr 1917 | A |
1658118 | Doddridge | Feb 1928 | A |
1826998 | Doddridge | Oct 1931 | A |
1848246 | Dowell | Mar 1932 | A |
1849167 | Bente | Mar 1932 | A |
1922878 | Boyle | Aug 1933 | A |
1956767 | Kibler | May 1934 | A |
2073947 | Sander | Mar 1937 | A |
1749190 | McGregor | Apr 1938 | A |
2123167 | Cain | Jul 1938 | A |
2265698 | Opgenorth | Dec 1941 | A |
2777227 | Imhoff | Jan 1957 | A |
3210051 | Case | Oct 1965 | A |
3258250 | Mcmullin | Jun 1966 | A |
3417965 | Gray | Dec 1968 | A |
3447786 | Bigni | Jun 1969 | A |
3589681 | Ackerman | Jun 1971 | A |
3726750 | Stillings | Apr 1973 | A |
3784167 | Glaesener | Jan 1974 | A |
4474503 | Booth | Oct 1984 | A |
4739971 | Ruane | Apr 1988 | A |
4778250 | McRoskey | Oct 1988 | A |
4784515 | Krage | Nov 1988 | A |
4806044 | Duckett | Feb 1989 | A |
4979817 | Crisp, Sr. | Dec 1990 | A |
5664905 | Thompson | Sep 1997 | A |
5720470 | Johansson | Feb 1998 | A |
6059487 | Haga | May 2000 | A |
6254063 | Rohde | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272796 | Metzler | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290427 | Ochoa | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6398192 | Albritton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413009 | Duckett | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6485224 | Dyke | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488268 | Albritton | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6533249 | Ochoa | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6551011 | Valentine | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6644888 | Ochoa | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666616 | Yodock, III | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6729607 | Alberson | May 2004 | B2 |
6783116 | Albritton | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6843613 | Gelfand | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6932327 | Alberson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7144186 | Nolte | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7367549 | Titmus | May 2008 | B2 |
7530548 | Ochoa | May 2009 | B2 |
7544009 | Bergendahl | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7581351 | Lewis | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7794173 | Amengual Pericas | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7866106 | Bowlware | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7866913 | Kulp | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878485 | Conway | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7913981 | Rohde | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7950870 | Thompson | May 2011 | B1 |
7988133 | Gripne | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7997824 | Amengual Pericas | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8001880 | White | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8033053 | Anderson | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8083433 | Neusch | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8127419 | Calton | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8210767 | Swahlan | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8235359 | Dyke | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8439594 | Clark | May 2013 | B1 |
8517349 | Ross | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8596617 | James | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9347191 | Kemper | May 2016 | B2 |
9410298 | Kemper et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9428872 | Neusch | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9435088 | Kemper et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9719220 | Neusch | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10047488 | Leonhardt | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10208430 | Lawler | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10767325 | Humphries | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20030081997 | Kramer | May 2003 | A1 |
20030089066 | Nelson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030146426 | Ray | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050191125 | Albritton | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050199868 | Morris | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060002760 | Vellozzi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011900 | Ochoa | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070102689 | Alberson | May 2007 | A1 |
20080131200 | Winkler | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20120056143 | James | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120207541 | Maus | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140110651 | Cox | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150346060 | Simon | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160017555 | Kemper et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160053449 | Kemper et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160115661 | Neusch | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160230358 | Kemper et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20180327985 | Lawler | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190085589 | McKinney | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190186092 | Neusch | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20210115635 | Delot | Apr 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4031781 | Apr 1991 | DE |
4335904 | May 1995 | DE |
0369659 | May 1990 | EP |
2224529 | May 1990 | GB |
2481647 | Apr 2012 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/028690, dated Jul. 15, 2016. |
U.S. Dept. of State, DS-41 K-4 Anti-Ram Fence Details, Feb. 4, 2010. |
Baker, Vehicle Fence Type 1 Gate, Apr. 3, 2008. |
Baker, Personnel-Vehicle Type 2A, Nov. 4, 2007. |
Baker, Vehicle Fence Type 1, Apr. 21, 2008. |
ASTM Designation F 2656-07, Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers. |
Stallwart Post & Rail Anti-Ram Crash Barrier; Ameristar Fence Products; Jun. 2014. |
Ameristar Stalwart M50-P1 Single Run Layout; dated May 4, 2015. |
Ameristar Stalwart K12 Post and Rail; dated May 4, 2015. |
Ameristar Stallwart M40 P2 Post and Rail; dated May 5, 2015. |
DOS SD-STD-02.01, Revision A Draft, Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers and Gates, Jan. 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190063020 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62151370 | Apr 2015 | US | |
62165163 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15135400 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 16167260 | US |