The present invention relates to the assembly and installation of bollard systems for use in protecting building and other structures from being rammed by vehicles. It also relates to the adaption of bollard systems to varying installation requirements, and the disguising of the bollards to make them appear to be part of a normal landscape around a building or structure.
A well know activity of terrorists is to crash a vehicle loaded with explosives or incendiary material into a building or other structure, so as to inflict damage to the building or other structure, and to harm the people in the building or structure. Various bollard constructions and methods of installation have been proposed and utilized in the past. Typically these bollard installations required rather deep excavations, several feet or more, to receive the base for a group of bollards. Alternatively, individual bollards were anchored by boring deep holes to receive the lower end of the bollard.
With the increased threat of terrorism, it has become desirable, and to some extend even necessary, to provide bollard protection to existing buildings in a well developed urban or commercial area. Typically it is desirable to locate the bollards between the building or other structure and the adjacent streets or roadways. Quite often buried below the surface of the space between a building or other structure and the street are utilities such as gas, water, electric, and telephone or other communication lines and related components. Thus, to provide a deep excavation for the base of a bollard system is difficult if not impossible. While the underground utilities, could be moved to make way for the deep excavation for the base of a bollard system, to do so would be quite costly, and considerable construction time would be required. Such construction would not only most likely result in disruption of the utility services, but more so disrupts travel on the street and pedestrian traffic on the sidewalk between the building and the street.
It would therefore be desirable to provide a bollard system which would require very little or no excavation for the base of the bollard system, and which bollard system could be partially or completely preassembled and readily delivered to the installation site for placement and final assembly. It would be further desirable that the bollard system be readily adaptable to different terrain and installation requirements. For instance, it should be adaptable to installation on slopes, around corners, and in other none straight line applications. Further, it should meet installation requirements such as allowing for vents and access to underground vaults, and accommodating fire hydrants and street lighting poles. Further, it should provide for ramps for handicap access to the building or structure, and even for removal of one or more bollards to provide vehicle access to the building when occasionally needed.
In accordance with this invention, a bollard system is provided which requires very little or no excavation for the base of the bollard system, and which can be partially or fully assembled prior to bringing it to the installation site. The bollard system of this invention includes one or more bollards secured to a shallow mounting pad or base. The shallow mounting pad or base of the bollard system of this invention may be formed or constructed in various ways and of various materials. In all cases, the shallow mounting pad or base is designed to made of heavy materials, so as to have considerable mass.
The major benefit in the physics of the bollard system of this invention, is that the striking forces from the crash vehicle are transmitted from the bollard down to the shallow mount pad (5″ to 14″ in depth) in a way that is different from standard deep trench foundations (4′ to 6′). The shallow mount pad is pushed down onto the soil (horizontal force backwards) instead of into the soil (vertical force downwards) as in the case of deep trench foundations.
The shallow base system makes for a much more effective and efficient load transfer into the soil which reduces the overall volume of displacement of soil by the base, as compared to the standard deep trench foundation systems. The shallow base system of this invention also provides a more efficient foundational system.
One of the issues with the deep trench system is that the lateral compliance at the top of the trench is quite low: If there is no strong resistive force at the top of the trench, then there is a greater chance of more rotation of the bollard which would permit the crash vehicle to breach the system, thereby obviating the crash control device. In the shallow mount bollard system of this invention, the resistive forces are all at the base of the bollard (at the top of the trench) and therefore reduce the likelihood of the bollard rotating and vehicle breaching the security system.
The bollard system of this invention works as the crash vehicle strikes the bollard near its top edge translating the forces from that impact to the base of the bollard. The forces at the base of the bollard are transmitted to the foundation pad or base, and from there into the soil or concrete depending on what the unit is seated on. The resistance force is of the reverse order stated above.
The bollard system of this invention is able to become more shallow (14″ to 6.5″ to 3″) by controlling the compliance supplied by the foundation to resist the rotation at the base of the bollard. Specifically the bollard system of this invention can utilize a more shallow trench by more efficiently transmitting the loads to the support media (soil or concrete). The more efficient transfer of the impact load is also accomplished by the addition of either one, a group or all of the following enhancements: 1) a wider base; 2) a heavier base; 3) longer base (laterally and tying adjacent units together); 4) increasing the efficiency of the grillage; 5) stiffer base; 6) ability to place bollard in different locations in the base (for example placing the bollard at the back of the base makes the system weaker), 7) the addition of internal stiffeners both inside the tubes forming the base and inside the pipe forming the bollard, and 8) others.
While in the preferred embodiment of this invention the base or pad is rectangular, other shapes can be used, such as angled and curved bases, zigzags, and indented, so as to go around an appurtenance.
In the preferred embodiment of this invention the frame or grill of the base and the bollards are formed of structural steel members. The amount of weldment required to assemble the frame or grill of the base and the bollards is dependant upon the availability of stock or over the counter materials. If more stock or over the counter materials are usable and available then less weldment is required to connect pieces and create a stronger base grillage.
Another major benefit of the shallow trench system of this invention is realized in its accommodation of site constraints (such as not interfering with underground utilities, able to install at sites where there is limited access to underground excavation (presence of vaults, basements), not interfering with vegetation, etc.
The base or pad in a preferred embodiment or the bollard system of this invention is constructed using a series of structural tubes to form a grillage (ie. pipes, tubes, channels and sometimes angles) to produce rigidity of the pad or base against upheaval and torsion forces. The grillage is a framework for supporting the load imparted by the bollard. The framework means the tubes (or other structural steel elements) tied together to form the grillage. The base or pad is completed on site, by filling the shallow excavation and grillage with concrete to form a finished foundation unit. It is preferred that the concrete be in contact with the soil or existing concrete at the base of the excavation in order to improve the resistance of the lateral motion of the pad. The top surface of the pad is to be formed in such a way to support the materials forming the final finished appearance (non-structural stone pavers or tiles, etc.).
The shallow base or pad concept of this invention differs from the standard deep trench system because it only requires a simple replacement of area near the surface, thereby significantly reducing the interference with any existing underground objects at the site. Unlike a deep trench footing, detailed inspection of pre-existing underground conditions, are not required. With the standard trench, personnel inspectors and multiple tools are required to hold the trench open, issues also arise with rain water or other media spilling into the trench.
The physics of the interaction of the base or pad of the bollard system of this invention with supporting media (soil or concrete) is different than that of the deep trench system, in that the forces imparted by the pad or base are much less than the forces imparted by the deep trench foundation. This is partly due to the large support area of the pad as compared to the deep trench foundation--the vertical forces being carried by the bottom edge of the trench foundation and the horizontal forces being carried by the top few inches of the trench foundation in a deep trench foundation, as compared to the horizontal forces being provided by the frictional forces being between the pad and media over the entire area of the pad and the vertical forces between the pad and media being carried over the entire area of the pad. The area of the pad or base in the bollard system of this invention may be reduced by the addition of engineered stiffeners, tying adjacent pads together, larger section modulus parts, larger welds, etc.
Restated, the area of a deep trench foundation interacting with the media is significantly smaller than the area of the pad interaction with the media in the system of this invention, thus the forces transferred to the media are far less than the forces transferred by the trench footing to the media. The pad or base of this invention spreads the forces out while the deep trench footing concentrates the forces which require the trench footing to be massive and deep. The deep trench footing for comparable performance will always have to be more massive than the pad or base of this invention.
The pad or base of the bollard system of this invention is superior in design because it transmits the load more efficiently to the foundation (ground) than a deep trench design, thus allowing a smaller device to absorb the same or greater amount of energy than a more onerous design.
The shallow pad or base of the bollard system of this invention supports the development of corner units with inherent advantages over a deep trench foundation. The shallow base of the system of this invention allows for complex geometry at corners, thereby facilitating ADA access and foot traffic by allowing bollards to be placed in an optimal pattern for pedestrian traffic without regard to the excavation needed to support the bollards. This is achieved by taking advantage of the flexibility in bollard placement offered by the grillage concept that allows the bollards to be placed anywhere in the grillage. Whereas with deep trench footing, the bollards necessarily need to be lined up with the trench itself In order for the deep trench to support out of line placement of bollards, it would have to be the full width of the bollard pattern whereas only an excavation of the shape of that pad needs to be made in accordance with this invention.
The flexibility of the bollard system of this invention permits the extension of a pad in any one direction for any unique situation for the bollard to be supported by the pad, but not beyond the pad. This is achieved by extending a tube connected to the grillage in any desired direction and placing (anchoring) a bollard in the tube.
In certain situations, site encumbrances may not allow a pad or base to be used where it is desirable to place one or more bollards. Extending one or more horizontal connector tubes between spaced pads achieves the necessary anti-ram capability without requiring additional excavation for the pad itself. In a specific embodiment, a connector tube, either above or below ground, can be secured at its ends to the grillage of two adjacent pads with the ends of one or more bollards placed in vertical holes formed in the connector tube. The physics behind this inventive concept is that the torsional rigidity of the connector tube is being used to resist the motion of the bollard, instead of upheaval or moment resistance of the tube used in the standard pad design. That is, when a vehicle strikes the bollard in the conventional design the tube supporting the bollard on axis with the impact is the tube that resists the motion of the bollard using its moment capacity, while in this alternate construction, the tube resists the motion of the bollard with its torsional capacity, bending not twisting.
Another variation of this invention provides removable units in which the bollard is temporarily removed for access through the on-center spacing and then replaced for its anti-ram purpose. The method to achieve this without a fixed bottom weld is the addition of an extra thick steel sleeve connected to the base of the grillage, with the bollard being slipped into and out of the sleeve. Additional bolts or a variation of locking mechanisms provide security to prevent unauthorized personnel from removing the removable bollard.
When using the shallow base of pad system of this invention, it may be necessary to place the pad over an air vent or access open to an underground space. To accommodate this need, the grillage is formed to provide an open space located over the air vent or access opening. A form is provided around the open space, such that when concrete is introduced into the grillage, it does not enter the open space. Once the base of the pad system is completed, the usual grate or grill can be placed over the opening.
While it is desirable in accordance with this invention to have the pad extend further in the direction of expected impact, that is on the opposite side of the bollard from the side of impact, than on the side of impact, some applications may require a reversal of the extension. For instance, if it becomes necessary to move the bollards farther away from the road, that is closer to the building being protected, a bollard unit in accordance with this invention may be lifted, rotated 180 degrees and replaced. This rotation will place the bollards closer to the building and farther away from the road. The bollard system of this invention also makes possible the temporary removal of the bollards and the supporting base. For instance, if it becomes desirable to access something under the bollards, the bollards and connected base may be lifted and temporarily removed. This would not be feasible with a deep trench bollard system.
The bollard system of this invention does not lend itself to the installation of a single bollard, since without an extended base or pad, there is not sufficient resistance to stop the rotation of the pipe bollard. However, a feature of this invention is to provide a single bollard with a supporting pad, such that if a single bollard is damaged in a row of bollards, the damaged bollard and its supporting pad may be cut out of the row of bollards and the supporting pad of the single replacement bollard secured to supporting pads of the adjacent bollards.
In its most basic form the bollard system of this invention would have its base or pad formed of a continuous flat piece of steel with holes cut out for the bollards. The plate would need a minimum depth 5″ to qualify as a DOS rated system. The cross pieces are inherent in the continuous plate. Still another basic configuration of the bollard system of this invention is to bolt separate thick pieces of steel to continuous cross plates, and to have the bollard set inside that construction. Again, 5″ thick steel would be required to have two plates 5″ apart.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
While only one embodiment of the invention has been shown, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that what has been described is considered at present to be a preferred embodiment of the anti-ram system and method of installation of this invention. In accordance with the Patent Statute, changes may be made in the anti-ram system and method of installation of this invention without actually departing from the true spirit and scope of this invention. The appended claims are intended to cover all such changes and modifications which fall in the true spirit and scope of this invention.
This Application is a continuation of and claims priority of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/694,730 filed Jan. 27, 2010 which is a continuation of and claims priority of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/191,251 filed Jul. 26, 2005, which claims the benefit of the six provisional patent applications identified below. This Application also claims the benefit of these six provisional patent applications identified below, and incorporates herein by reference the entire contents and teachings of the six provisional patent applications identified below and the entire contents and teachings of application Ser. Nos. 11/191,251 and 12/694,730. The six provisional patent applications are: U.S. Application No. 60/591,018 for Foundation module for anti-ram devices where subsurface clearances are minimal, by Richard Steven Adler and John Crawford, filed Jul. 26, 2004. U.S. Application No. 60/600,955 for Anti-ram foundation pad, by Richard Steven Adler and John Crawford, filed Aug. 12, 2004. U.S. Application No. 60/605,959 for RSA/K&C anti-ram foundation pad, by Richard Steven Adler and John Crawford, filed Aug. 30, 2004. U.S. Application No. 60/622,385 for RSA/K&C anti-ram foundation pad with attached surface elements, by Richard Steven Adler and John Crawford, filed Oct. 26, 2004. U.S. Application No. 60/674,965 for RSA/K&C anti ram bollards and RSA/K&C anti-ram headknocker, by Richard Steven Adler and John Crawford, filed Apr. 25, 2005. U.S. Application No. 60/679,547 for RSA/K&C anti-ram bollard pad extension sleeves with integral structural integrity, by Richard Steven Adler, John Crawford and George Heyward, filed May 9, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60591018 | Jul 2004 | US | |
60600955 | Aug 2004 | US | |
60605959 | Aug 2004 | US | |
60622385 | Oct 2004 | US | |
60674965 | Apr 2005 | US | |
60679547 | May 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12694730 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 13491878 | US | |
Parent | 11191251 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 12694730 | US |